Cardiac performance in infants referred for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Institution of Veno-arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Does Not Lead to Increased Wall Stress in Patients with Impaired Myocardial Function

The effect of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) on wall stress in patients with cardiomyopathy, myocarditis, or other cardiac conditions is unknown. We set out to determine the circumferential and meridional wall stress (WS) in patients with systemic left ventricles before and during VA ECMO. We established a cohort of patients with impaired myocardial function who underwent VA ECMO therapy from January 2000 to November 2013. Demographic and clinical data were collected and inotropic score calculated. Measurements were taken on echocardiograms prior to the initiation of VA ECMO and while on full-flow VA ECMO, in order to derive wall stress (circumferential and meridional), VCFc, ejection fraction, and fractional shortening. A post hoc sub-analysis was conducted, separating those with pulmonary hypertension (PH) and those with impaired systemic output. Thirty-three patients met inclusion criteria. The patients' median age was 0.06 years (range 0-18.7). Eleven (33%) patients constituted the organ failure group (Gr2), while the remaining 22 (66%) patients survived to discharge (Gr1). WS and all other echocardiographic measures were not different when comparing patients before and during VA ECMO. Ejection and shortening fraction, WS, and VCFc were not statistically different comparing the survival and organ failure groups. The patients' position on the VCFc-WS curve did not change after the initiation of VA ECMO. Those with PH had decreased WS as well as increased EF after ECMO initiation, while those with impaired systemic output showed no difference in those parameters with initiation of ECMO. The external workload on the myocardium as indicated by WS is unchanged by the institution of VA ECMO support. Furthermore, echocardiographic measures of cardiac function do not reflect the changes in ventricular performance inherent to VA ECMO support. These findings are informative for the interpretation of echocardiograms in the setting of VA ECMO. ECMO may improve ventricular mechanics in those with PH as the primary diagnosis.

Increasing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation flow negatively affects left ventricular performance in a porcine model of cardiogenic shock

Background

The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between extracorporeal blood flow (EBF) and left ventricular (LV) performance during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) therapy.

Methods

Five swine (body weight 45 kg) underwent VA ECMO implantation under general anesthesia and artificial ventilation. Subsequently, acute cardiogenic shock with signs of tissue hypoxia was induced. Hemodynamic and cardiac performance parameters were then measured at different levels of EBF (ranging from 1 to 5 L/min) using arterial and venous catheters, a pulmonary artery catheter and a pressure–volume loop catheter introduced into the left ventricle.

Results

Myocardial hypoxia resulted in a decline in mean (±SEM) cardiac output to 2.8 ± 0.3 L/min and systolic blood pressure (SBP) to 60 ± 7 mmHg. With an increase in EBF from 1 to 5 L/min, SBP increased to 97 ± 8 mmHg (P < 0.001); however, increasing EBF from 1 to 5 L/min significantly negatively influences several cardiac performance parameters: cardiac output decreased form 2.8 ± 0.3 L/min to 1.86 ± 0.53 L/min (P < 0.001), LV end-systolic volume increased from 64 ± 11 mL to 83 ± 14 mL (P < 0.001), LV stroke volume decreased from 48 ± 9 mL to 40 ± 8 mL (P = 0.045), LV ejection fraction decreased from 43 ± 3 % to 32 ± 3 % (P < 0.001) and stroke work increased from 2096 ± 342 mmHg mL to 3031 ± 404 mmHg mL (P < 0.001). LV end-diastolic pressure and volume were not significantly affected.

Conclusions

The results of the present study indicate that higher levels of VA ECMO blood flow in cardiogenic shock may negatively affect LV function. Therefore, it appears that to mitigate negative effects on LV function, optimal VA ECMO blood flow should be set as low as possible to allow adequate tissue perfusion.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in infants with meconium aspiration syndrome: a decade of experience with venovenous ECMO

BACKGROUND

Despite the emergence of new therapies for respiratory failure of the newborn with meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has a significant role as a rescue modality in these infants. Our objective was to compare the use of venovenous (VV) vs venoarterial (VA) ECMO in newborns with MAS who need ECMO and to ascertain the impact of new therapies in these infants during the last decade. We also evaluated how disease severity or time of ECMO initiation affected mortality and morbidity.

METHODS

A report of 12 years experience (1990-2002) of a single center, comparing VV and VA ECMO, is given. Venovenous ECMO was the preferred rescue modality for respiratory failure unresponsive to maximal medical therapy. Venoarterial ECMO was used only when the placement of a VV ECMO 14-F catheter was not possible; 128 patients met ECMO criteria, 114 were treated with VV ECMO, and 12 with VA ECMO. Two patients were converted from VV to VA ECMO.

RESULTS

Venovenous and VA ECMO patients had comparable birth weight (mean +/- SEM, 3.48 +/- 0.05 vs 3.35 +/- 0.15 kg) and gestational age (40.3 +/- 0.1 vs 40.7 +/- 0.3 weeks). Before ECMO, there was no difference between VV and VA ECMO patients in oxygenation index (60 +/- 3 vs 63 +/- 8), mean airway pressure (19.5 +/- 0.4 vs 20.8 +/- 1.5 cm H2O), alveolar-arterial O2 gradient (630 +/- 2 vs 632 +/- 4 torr), ECMO cannulation age (median [25th-75th percentiles], 23 [14-47] vs 26 [14-123] hours), or in the % of patients who needed vasopressors/inotropes (98% vs 100%). From November 1994, inhaled nitric oxide (NO) was available. Before VV ECMO, 67% of the patients received NO, 24% received surfactant, and 48% were treated with high-frequency ventilation (HFV). There was no significant difference between VV and VA ECMO patients in survival rate (94% vs 92%), ECMO duration (88 [64-116] vs 94 [55-130] hours), time of extubation (9 [7-11] vs 14 [9-15] days), age at discharge (23 [18-30] vs 27 [15-41] days), or incidence of short-term intracranial complications (5.3% vs 16.7%). For the total cohort of 126 infants, indices of disease severity (oxygenation index, alveolar-arterial O 2 gradient, mean airway pressure) did not correlate with outcome measures. Delay in ECMO initiation (> 96 hours) was associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation and hospitalization (P < .01). New therapies (NO, HFV, surfactant) in the second part of the decade were associated with a longer ECMO duration (98 [80-131] vs 87 [60-116] hours; P < .05), no delay in ECMO initiation time (23 [10-40] vs 24 [14-52] hours), and no significant change in survival (97% vs 92.5%). No patient was treated with VA ECMO after 1994.

CONCLUSIONS

Venovenous ECMO is as reliable as VA ECMO in newborns with MAS in severe respiratory failure who need ECMO. Delay in ECMO initiation may result in prolonged mechanical ventilation and increased length of hospital stay. The emergence of new conventional therapies (NO, HFV, surfactant) and particularly increased experience enable sole use of VV ECMO with no significant change in survival in infants with MAS.

Systemic hypertension associated with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for pediatric respiratory failure

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Arterial hypertension (HTN) is common in neonates on venoarterial (VA) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), but HTN in pediatric venovenous (VV) ECMO has not been well described. The authors noted HTN in their VV ECMO experience and hypothesized that HTN was associated with fluid status, steroid use, and renal insufficiency.

METHODS

Records of 50 patients receiving VV ECMO for respiratory failure were reviewed. HTN was defined as systolic blood pressure greater than 95th percentile for age for > or =1 hour, unresponsive to sedation/analgesia. Hypertensive index (HI) is defined as total hypertensive hours per total ECMO hours. Fluid status was estimated by a fluid index (FI = total fluid balance during ECMO per ECMO hours per weight).

RESULTS

Forty-seven of 50 patients (94%) had HTN. Median HI was 0.21 (range, 0.01 to 1.0). Thirteen patients had renal insufficiency, 39 received steroids, and 23 received continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH). There was no association between HI and FI, steroid use, or renal insufficiency. Thirty-three patients were treated for HTN, often requiring multiple agents. Bleeding complicated the course of 18 patients, and HI was significantly higher in those patients (P = .03). HI was not different between survivors (37 of 39 with HTN) and nonsurvivors (10 of 11 with HTN).

CONCLUSIONS

Hypertension is a common complication associated with VV ECMO with unclear etiology. HTN was frequently difficult to control. This study emphasizes the need for the development of treatment protocols to decrease the incidence, severity, and associated morbidity. Improved insight into the etiology of HTN associated with pediatric VV ECMO, including evaluation of the renin-angiotensin system, would help guide therapy.

Venovenous versus venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in congenital diaphragmatic hernia

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has a significant role as a final rescue modality in severe respiratory failure of the newborn with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). The objective of this study was to compare the efficiency of venovenous (VV) versus venoarterial (VA) ECMO in newborns with CDH.

METHODS

A retrospective report of 11 years experience (1990 through 2001) of a single center, comparing VV and VA ECMO is given. VV ECMO was the preferred rescue modality for respiratory failure unresponsive to maximal medical therapy. Only when the placement of a VV ECMO 14F catheter was not possible, VA ECMO was used. Forty-six patients met ECMO criteria; 26 were treated with VV ECMO and 19 with VA ECMO. One patient underwent conversion from VV to VA ECMO.

RESULTS

Before ECMO, there was no difference between VV and VA ECMO patients in mean oxygenation index (83 v 83), mean airway pressure (18.4 v 18.9 cm H(2)O), ECMO cannulation age (28 v 20 hours), or in the percentage of patients who needed dopamine and dobutamine (100% v 100%). From November 1994, nitric oxide (NO) was available; before ECMO, 11 of 14 (79%) VV ECMO patients received NO versus 9 of 10 (90%) patients in the VA group. VV ECMO patients were larger (3.34 v 2.77 kg; P <.05) and of advanced gestational age (39.0 v 36.9 wk; P <.05) compared with VA ECMO patients. There was no significant difference between VV and VA ECMO patients in survival rate (18 of 26, 69% v 13 of 19, 68%), ECMO duration (152 v 150 hours), time of extubation (32.0 v 33.5 days), age at discharge (73 v 81 days), or incidence of short-term intracranial complications (3.8% v 10.5%) or myocardial stun (3.8% v 15.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

The authors conclude that VV ECMO is as reliable as VA ECMO in newborns with CDH in severe respiratory failure who need ECMO support and who can accommodate the VV double-lumen catheter. Because of its potential advantages, VV ECMO may be the preferred ECMO method in these infants.

Primary use of the venovenous approach for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in pediatric acute respiratory failure

OBJECTIVES

To describe a single center's experience with the primary use of venovenous cannulation for supporting pediatric acute respiratory failure patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review of all patients receiving extracorporeal life support at a single institution.

SETTING

Pediatric intensive care unit at a tertiary care children's hospital.

PATIENTS

Eighty-two patients between the ages of 2 wks and 18 yrs with severe acute respiratory failure.

INTERVENTIONS

ECMO for acute respiratory failure.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

From January 1991 until April 2002, 82 pediatric patients with acute respiratory failure were cannulated for ECMO support. Median duration of ventilation before ECMO was 5 days (range, 1-17 days). Sixty-eight of these patients (82%) initially were placed on venovenous ECMO. Fourteen patients were initiated and remained on venoarterial support, including six in whom venovenous cannulae could not be placed. One patient was converted from venovenous to venoarterial support due to inadequate oxygenation. Venoarterial patients had significantly greater alveolar-arterial oxygen gradients and lower PaO(2)/FIO(2) ratios than venovenous patients (p <.03). Fifty-five of 81 venovenous patients received additional drainage cannulae (46 of 55 with an internal jugular cephalad catheter). Thirty-five percent of venovenous patients and 36% of venoarterial patients required at least one vasopressor infusion at time of cannulation (p = nonsignificant); vasopressor dependence decreased over the course of ECMO in both groups. Median duration on venovenous ECMO for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure was 218 hrs (range, 24-921). Venovenous ECMO survivors remained cannulated for significantly shorter time than nonsurvivors did (median, 212 vs. 350 hrs; p =.04). Sixty-three of 82 ECMO (77%) patients survived to discharge-56 of 68 venovenous ECMO (81%) and nine of 14 venoarterial ECMO (64%).

CONCLUSIONS

Venovenous ECMO can effectively provide adequate oxygenation for pediatric patients with severe acute respiratory failure receiving ECMO support. Additional cannulae placed at the initiation of venovenous ECMO could be beneficial in achieving flow rates necessary for adequate oxygenation and lung rest.

Cardiovascular complications adversely affect survival during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

OBJECTIVES

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been used in the management of infants with cardiorespiratory failure. ECMO causes a decrease in load-dependent measures of cardiac performance that have not been demonstrated to affect patient outcome, while other cardiovascular complications occur which may affect outcome. The purpose of this study was to describe the cardiovascular complications associated with ECMO, and to determine their relationship to survival.

DESIGN

Data were obtained, retrospectively, from the medical records of 500 consecutive newborns treated with ECMO at our institution since 1984.

RESULTS

Hypertension (mean arterial pressure of >65 mm Hg) was the most common complication, requiring medical intervention in 192 infants. Myocardial stun, the near-total absence of systolic function during ECMO, occurred in 59 infants. Rhythm abnormalities, including noncannulation-related bradycardia, occurred in 43 infants, cardiac arrest, and pericardial effusion in 17 infants, and noninfective thrombosis in 9 infants. Only one infant required ligation of a patent ductus arteriosus during ECMO. Infants with at least one cardiovascular complication had a lower survival rate, compared with those infants without a complication. Survival rates were decreased in infants with myocardial stun, arrhythmia, and cardiac arrest. Hypertension and pericardial effusion were not associated with decreased survival.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that some cardiovascular complications during ECMO are more common than previously thought, and cardiovascular complications may adversely impact outcome.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation exposes infants to the plasticizer, di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate

OBJECTIVES

To determine the exposure to, and evaluate the potential toxicity from, the plasticizer, di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy.

DESIGN

Protocol 1 consisted of a prospective comparison of three ECMO circuit designs in vitro. Protocol 2 consisted of a prospective, comparative clinical study evaluating DEHP plasma concentrations in ECMO vs. non-ECMO patients with respiratory failure.

SETTING

Neonatal intensive care unit at The Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC.

PATIENTS

In protocol 2, 28 consecutive term infants were referred for ECMO therapy. Eighteen infants required ECMO; ten control patients received conventional ventilation and improved without ECMO.

INTERVENTIONS

In protocol 1, three ECMO circuit designs were primed in vitro with normal saline, albumin, and human blood, which was maintained at 37 degrees C and recirculated at 400 mL/min for 48 hrs. Plasma samples were obtained at time 0, 1 hr, and every 6 hrs. In protocol 2, ventilatory and cardiovascular management of the patients in the study was conducted by the attending physician. Patients were placed on ECMO when they met the institutional criteria for ECMO therapy. Daily plasma concentrations for DEHP were collected until 3 days after decannulation from bypass in the ECMO group. Control patients were sampled daily until extubation. Evidence of cardiac, liver, or lung toxicity was evaluated by Chest Radiographic Scores, liver function studies, and echocardiograms obtained on day 1, day 3, and the day of decannulation in the ECMO group, or at the time of extubation in the control group. Sedation, blood product transfusions as indicated, antibiotics, and hyperalimentation were administered to all patients.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

All DEHP plasma concentrations were measured by gas chromatography. In protocol 1, three circuits were studied: circuit A (small surface area); circuit B (larger surface area); and circuit C (surface area of A but with heparin-bonded tubing in the circuit). DEHP leached from circuit A at 0.32 +/- 0.12 microgram/ mL/hr, compared with 0.57 +/- 0.14 microgram/mL/hr from circuit B (p < .05). This amount of DEHP extrapolates in the ECMO patient to a potential exposure of 20 to 70 times that exposure from other medical devices or procedures, such as transfusions, dialysis, or short-term cardiopulmonary bypass. Circuit C showed almost no leaching from the circuit; DEHP concentrations decreased at a rate of 0.2 +/- 0.04 microgram/mL/ hr. In protocol 2, DEHP was undetected in the control patients. DEHP concentrations in ECMO patients were greater in the early course of ECMO. However, most patients cleared this compound from the plasma before decannulation. In contrast to the in vitro results in protocol 1, the average highest concentration at any time on bypass was 8.3 +/- 5.7 micrograms/mL or 2 mg/kg.

CONCLUSIONS

DEHP leaches from ECMO circuits, with potential exposure concentrations related to the surface area of the tubing in the ECMO circuit. Heparin bonding of the tubing eliminates this risk. Although significant concentrations of DEHP leach from the nonheparin-bonded circuits over time, our in vivo studies showed that the DEHP plasma concentrations were less than the previously reported values and do not correlate with any observable short-term toxicity. This compound may be either efficiently metabolized by the newborn, or redistributed into various tissues. Although signs of toxicity were not found in this study, long-term complications from chronic exposure to DEHP have not been determined.

Preferential use of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for congenital diaphragmatic hernia

Acute respiratory failure (ARF) secondary to congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), unresponsive to maximal medical management, has traditionally been treated with venoarterial (VA) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Venovenous (VV) ECMO offers several benefits over VA ECMO including preserved pulmonary blood flow, preservation of the carotid artery, and pulsatile flow. However, use of the VV modality has not been widespread because of concerns of the cardiac instability during bypass, and because only one double-lumen (DL) catheter size is available in the United States. The authors hypothesize that VV ECMO is a safe and effective treatment for CDH, symptomatic at birth, and report a single institution experience of preferential VV use for CDH. Over an 18-month period, 14 patients with CDH were placed on ECMO after maximal medical management failed, including high-frequency ventilation and nitric oxide in some cases. Ability to place the 14 Fr DL catheter was the sole criteria for VA or VV selection. Nine patients were successfully placed on VV and 5 on VA; no VV patient required conversion to VA. The two groups of patients were similar with respect to degree of illness, birth weight, EGA, time on and age at start of ECMO. Overall survival for this series was 64%: 66% in the VV group and 60% in the VA group. Two patients in the VV group were found to have congenital heart disease incompatible with life, were withdrawn from therapy and allowed to die, and are listed as treatment failures. The authors conclude that CDH patients receive adequate oxygenation and show hemodynamic stability on VV ECMO.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effects of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on cardiac performance as determined by echocardiographic measurements

We evaluated the effects of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) on cardiac performance by echocardiographic measurements in 15 infants. Heart rate and blood pressure were also recorded. Echocardiographic measurements included aortic and pulmonary peak blood flow velocities, pulmonary time to peak velocity, left ventricular shortening fraction, velocity of circumferential fiber shortening corrected for heart rate, and peak systolic wall stress before, during, and after venovenous ECMO. Pre-ECMO echocardiograms showed borderline or normal indexes of cardiac function. After initiation of venovenous ECMO, all infants had normalization and no infant had deterioration of cardiac performance. The inotropic agents dopamine and dobutamine were decreased from average doses of 12 and 3.6 micrograms/kg per minute, respectively, to 3.7 and 1.3 micrograms/kg per minute, respectively, within 8.8 hours of the institution of venovenous ECMO. During this time the mean arterial pressure remained stable, and the heart rate decreased (169 +/- 21 vs 136 +/- 15 beats/min; p < 0.001). During the course of ECMO there were no changes in left ventricular shortening fraction, velocity of circumferential fiber shortening corrected for heart rate, or aortic peak blood flow velocities. Pulmonary artery peak blood flow velocity (69 +/- 22 vs 92 +/- 28 cm/sec; p = 0.04) and pulmonary time to peak velocity improved (47 +/- 11 vs 65 +/- 16 msec; p = 0.026). We conclude that venovenous ECMO does not have deleterious effects on cardiac performance.

Efficacy of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for neonates with respiratory and circulatory compromise

We report a 12-month experience at Egleston Children's Hospital in Atlanta, Ga., with a protocol under which venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) was used instead of venoarterial ECMO. Fifty-five newborn infants were referred for ECMO, four of whom had disqualifying conditions (all four died). Thirty-one infants were supported without recourse to ECMO, one of whom died. Of the 20 remaining patients, three were placed on a venoarterial ECMO regimen because of our early uncertainty about the efficacy of venovenous ECMO or because of technical constraints. All other patients (n = 17), including three with congenital diaphragmatic hernia, were supported with venovenous perfusion. No patient begun on a venovenous ECMO regimen required conversion to venoarterial bypass. Before ECMO, venovenous patients required an average dopamine dose of 16 micrograms/kg per minute and an average dobutamine dose of 6 micrograms/kg per minute. Of 15 patients studied before ECMO, three had significantly impaired contractility, and all had evidence of pulmonary hypertension on an echocardiogram. Mean blood pressure did not change while heart rate fell from 172 to 146 beats/min during the first 2 hours of ECMO and vasoactive drug doses were reduced. Of the 17 venovenous ECMO patients, 15 (88%) survived. We conclude that neonatal patients with severe hypoxia and substantial circulatory compromise can be effectively supported by venovenous ECMO in most cases.