Is anti-Pseudomonas therapy warranted in acute respiratory exacerbations in children with cystic fibrosis?

Single versus combination intravenous anti-pseudomonal antibiotic therapy for people with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

The choice of antibiotic, and the use of single or combined therapy are controversial areas in the treatment of respiratory infection due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis (CF). Advantages of combination therapy include wider range of modes of action, possible synergy and reduction of resistant organisms; advantages of monotherapy include lower cost, ease of administration and reduction of drug-related toxicity. Current evidence does not provide a clear answer and the use of intravenous antibiotic therapy in CF requires further evaluation. This is an update of a previously published review.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of single compared to combination intravenous anti-pseudomonal antibiotic therapy for treating people with CF.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register, comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. Most recent search of the Group's Trials Register: 07 October 2020. We also searched online trials registries on 16 November 2020.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing a single intravenous anti-pseudomonal antibiotic with a combination of that antibiotic plus a second anti-pseudomonal antibiotic in people with CF.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We assessed the certainty of the data using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 59 trials, of which we included eight trials (356 participants) comparing a single anti-pseudomonal agent to a combination of the same antibiotic and one other. There was a wide variation in the individual antibiotics used in each trial. In total, the trials included seven comparisons of a beta-lactam antibiotic (penicillin-related or third generation cephalosporin) with a beta-lactam-aminoglycoside combination and three comparisons of an aminoglycoside with a beta-lactam-aminoglycoside combination.  There was considerable heterogeneity amongst these trials, leading to difficulties in performing the review and interpreting the results. These results should be interpreted cautiously. Six of the included trials were published between 1977 and 1988; these were single-centre trials with flaws in the randomisation process and small sample size. Overall, the methodological quality was poor and the certainty of the evidence ranged from low to moderate. The review did not find any differences between monotherapy and combination therapy in either the short term or in the long term for the outcomes of different lung function measures, bacteriological outcome measures, need for additional treatment, adverse effects, quality of life or symptom scores.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The results of this review are inconclusive. The review raises important methodological issues. There is a need for an RCT which needs to be well-designed in terms of adequate randomisation allocation, blinding, power and long-term follow-up. Results need to be standardised to a consistent method of reporting, in order to validate the pooling of results from multiple trials.

Single versus combination intravenous anti-pseudomonal antibiotic therapy for people with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Choice of antibiotic, and the use of single or combined therapy are controversial areas in the treatment of respiratory infection due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis (CF). Advantages of combination therapy include wider range of modes of action, possible synergy and reduction of resistant organisms; advantages of monotherapy include lower cost, ease of administration and reduction of drug-related toxicity. Current evidence does not provide a clear answer and the use of intravenous antibiotic therapy in cystic fibrosis requires further evaluation. This is an update of a previously published review.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of single compared to combination intravenous anti-pseudomonal antibiotic therapy for treating people with cystic fibrosis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register, comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings.Most recent search of the Group's Trials Register: 14 October 2016.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing a single intravenous anti-pseudomonal antibiotic with a combination of that antibiotic plus a second anti-pseudomonal antibiotic in people with CF.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 45 trials, of which eight trials (356 participants) comparing a single anti-pseudomonal agent to a combination of the same antibiotic and one other, were included.There was a wide variation in the individual antibiotics used in each trial. In total, the trials included seven comparisons of a beta-lactam antibiotic (penicillin-related or third generation cephalosporin) with a beta-lactam-aminoglycoside combination and three comparisons of an aminoglycoside with a beta-lactam-aminoglycoside combination. These two groups of trials were analysed as separate subgroups.There was considerable heterogeneity amongst these trials, leading to difficulties in performing the review and interpreting the results. The meta-analysis did not demonstrate any significant differences between monotherapy and combination therapy, in terms of lung function; symptom scores; adverse effects; and bacteriological outcome measures.These results should be interpreted cautiously. Six of the included trials were published between 1977 and 1988; these were single-centre trials with flaws in the randomisation process and small sample size. Overall, the methodological quality was poor.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The results of this review are inconclusive. The review raises important methodological issues. There is a need for an RCT which needs to be well-designed in terms of adequate randomisation allocation, blinding, power and long-term follow up. Results need to be standardised to a consistent method of reporting, in order to validate the pooling of results from multiple trials.

Duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy in people with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Respiratory disease is the major cause of mortality and morbidity in cystic fibrosis. Life expectancy of people with cystic fibrosis has increased dramatically in the last 40 years. One of the major reasons for this increase is the mounting use of antibiotics to treat chest exacerbations caused by bacterial infections. The optimal duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy is not clearly defined. Individuals usually receive intravenous antibiotics for 14 days, but treatment may range from 10 to 21 days. A shorter duration of antibiotic treatment risks inadequate clearance of infection which could lead to further lung damage. Prolonged courses of intravenous antibiotics are expensive and inconvenient and the incidence of allergic reactions to antibiotics also increases with prolonged courses. The use of aminoglycosides requires frequent monitoring to avoid some of their side effects. However, some organisms which infect people with cystic fibrosis are known to be multi-resistant to antibiotics, and may require a longer course of treatment. This is an update of previously published reviews.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the optimal duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy for treating chest exacerbations in people with cystic fibrosis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearches of relevant journals, abstract books and conference proceedings.Most recent search of the Group's Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register: 05 May 2016.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing different durations of intravenous antibiotic courses for acute respiratory exacerbations in people with CF, either with the same drugs at the same dosage, the same drugs at a different dosage or frequency or different antibiotics altogether, including studies with additional therapeutic agents.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

No eligible trials were identified.

MAIN RESULTS

No eligible trials were identified.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There are no clear guidelines on the optimum duration of intravenous antibiotic treatment. Duration of treatment is currently based on unit policies and response to treatment. Shorter duration of treatment should improve quality of life and compliance; result in a reduced incidence of drug reactions; and be less costly. However, this may not be sufficient to clear a chest infection and may result in an early recurrence of an exacerbation. This systematic review identifies the need for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial comparing different durations of intravenous antibiotic treatment as it has important clinical and financial implications.

Intravenous antibiotics for pulmonary exacerbations in people with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Cystic fibrosis is a multi-system disease characterised by the production of thick secretions causing recurrent pulmonary infection, often with unusual bacteria. Intravenous antibiotics are commonly used in the treatment of acute deteriorations in symptoms (pulmonary exacerbations); however, recently the assumption that exacerbations are due to increases in bacterial burden has been questioned.

OBJECTIVES

To establish if intravenous antibiotics for the treatment of pulmonary exacerbations in people with cystic fibrosis improve short- and long-term clinical outcomes.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register, compiled from electronic database searches and handsearching of journals and conference abstract books. We also searched the reference lists of relevant articles and reviews and ongoing trials registers.Date of last search of Cochrane trials register: 27 July 2015.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials and the first treatment cycle of cross-over studies comparing intravenous antibiotics (given alone or in an antibiotic combination) with placebo, inhaled or oral antibiotics for people with cystic fibrosis experiencing a pulmonary exacerbation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The authors assessed studies for eligibility and risk of bias and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 40 studies involving 1717 participants. The quality of the included studies was largely poor and, with a few exceptions, these comprised of mainly small, inadequately reported studies.When comparing treatment with a single antibiotic to a combined antibiotic regimen, those participants receiving a combination of antibiotics experienced a greater improvement in lung function when considered as a whole group across a number of different measurements of lung function, but with very low quality evidence. When limited to the four placebo-controlled studies (n = 214), no difference was observed, again with very low quality evidence. With regard to the review's remaining primary outcomes, there was no effect upon time to next exacerbation and no studies in any comparison reported on quality of life. There were no effects on the secondary outcomes weight or adverse effects. When comparing specific antibiotic combinations there were no significant differences between groups on any measure. In the comparisons between intravenous and nebulised antibiotic or oral antibiotic (low quality evidence), there were no significant differences between groups on any measure. No studies in any comparison reported on quality of life.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The quality of evidence comparing intravenous antibiotics with placebo is poor. No specific antibiotic combination can be considered to be superior to any other, and neither is there evidence showing that the intravenous route is superior to the inhaled or oral routes. There remains a need to understand host-bacteria interactions and in particular to understand why many people fail to fully respond to treatment.

Reduction in Pseudomonas aeruginosa sputum density during a cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbation does not predict clinical response

Background

Pulmonary exacerbations (PEx) are critical events in cystic fibrosis (CF), responsible for reduced quality of life and permanent loss of lung function. Approximately 1/4 of PEx are associated with failure to recover lung function and/or resolve symptoms. Developing tools to optimize PEx treatment is of paramount importance.

Methods

We retrospectively audited all adults infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, experiencing PEx necessitating parenteral antibiotic therapy from 2006–2012 from our center. Quantitative analysis of sputum at admission, twice-weekly during hospitalization, and end of therapy were compared to baseline (most recent healthy) and follow-up (after PEx) samples. Change in P. aeruginosa burden from baseline was assessed for any and all morphotypes (ALL), as well as mucoid (MUC) and non-mucoid (NON) isolates specifically. PEx were identified as failures if >90% of baseline pulmonary function was not recovered.

Results

Forty-six patients meeting the above inclusion and exclusion criteria experienced 144 PEx during this time (median 3, IQR 2–6). Patients were treated for a median 14 days (IQR 13–16). No increase in ALL, MUC or NON were detected at PEx, nor was there an association between change in sputum density and magnitude of lung function decline. PEx failures were observed in 30% of events. Reductions of at least 1-log and 2 log P. aeruginosa sputum density was observed in 57% and 46% (ALL), 73% and 55% (MUC) and 58% and 46% (NON) of PEx, respectively. Factors associated with greater reduction of P. aeruginosa sputum density included choice of β-lactam antibiotic, antibiotics with in vitro predicted activity and treatment duration. PEx associated with reductions in P. aeruginosa sputum density were not associated with a reduced risk of PEx failure.

Conclusions

Enhanced killing of P. aeruginosa during PEx does not predict improved clinical outcomes. Studies accounting for the polymicrobial nature of CF respiratory disease and the heterogeneity of P. aeruginosa causing chronic infection may enable the identification of a more appropriate pathogen(s) based biomarker of PEx outcomes.

Single versus combination intravenous antibiotic therapy for people with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Choice of antibiotic, and the use of single or combined therapy are controversial areas in the treatment of respiratory infection in cystic fibrosis (CF). Advantages of combination therapy include wider range of modes of action, possible synergy and reduction of resistant organisms; advantages of monotherapy include lower cost, ease of administration and reduction of drug-related toxicity. Current evidence does not provide a clear answer and the use of intravenous antibiotic therapy in CF requires further evaluation.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of single compared to combination intravenous antibiotic therapy for treating people with CF.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register, comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings.Most recent search of the Group's Trials Register: 22 August 2013.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing a single intravenous antibiotic with a combination of that antibiotic plus a second antibiotic in people with CF.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 43 trials, of which eight trials (356 participants) comparing a single agent to a combination of the same antibiotic and one other, were included.There was a wide variation in the individual antibiotics used in each trial. In total, the trials included seven comparisons of a beta-lactam antibiotic (penicillin-related or third generation cephalosporin) with a beta-lactam-aminoglycoside combination and three comparisons of an aminoglycoside with a beta-lactam-aminoglycoside combination. These two groups of trials were analysed as separate subgroups.There was considerable heterogeneity amongst these trials, leading to difficulties in performing the review and interpreting the results. The meta-analysis did not demonstrate any significant differences between monotherapy and combination therapy, in terms of lung function; symptom scores; adverse effects; and bacteriological outcome measures.These results should be interpreted cautiously. Six of the included trials were published between 1977 and 1988; these were single-centre trials with flaws in the randomisation process and small sample size. Overall, the methodological quality was poor.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The results of this review are inconclusive. The review raises important methodological issues. There is a need for an RCT which needs to be well-designed in terms of adequate randomisation allocation, blinding, power and long-term follow up. Results need to be standardised to a consistent method of reporting, in order to validate the pooling of results from multiple trials.

Is the improvement of CF patients, hospitalized for pulmonary exacerbation, correlated to a decrease in bacterial load?

Background

Cystic Fibrosis (CF) patients are vulnerable to airway colonization with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In case eradication fails after antibiotic treatment, patients become chronically colonized with P. aeruginosa, with recurrent pulmonary exacerbation, for which patients typically are hospitalized for 2 weeks and receive intravenous antibiotic treatment. Normally, improvement of the patients' health is established.

Aim

Determination of the correspondence between patient improvement and changes of the P. aeruginosa and total bacterial load in the sputum.

Methods

Eighteen CF patients with exacerbation were included for a total of 27 hospitalization episodes. At day 1, 8 and 15, inflammation and lung function parameters were determined, together with the P. aeruginosa load in the sputum using culture, quantitative PCR (qPCR) and propidium monoazide qPCR.

Results

Patients improved during hospitalization (decrease in levels of C-reactive protein, white blood cell counts and erythrocyte sedimentation rate, increase of FEV₁), reaching normal values already after one week. Also the P. aeruginosa load and the total bacterial load decreased during the first week of antibiotic treatment (p<0.05), except for patients with a low lung function (FEV₁≤39.4%), for whom no significant decrease of P. aeruginosa was established. Comparison of culture-based and propidium monoazide qPCR-based quantification of P. aeruginosa showed that at the end of the treatment on average 62% of the P. aeruginosa cells are not cultivable, indicating that many cells are alive but dormant, or dead but still structurally intact.

Conclusion

Improvement of the clinical status is accompanied with a decrease of the P. aeruginosa load, whereby both occur mainly during the first week of antibiotic treatment. However, for patients with a low lung function, no decrease of the P. aeruginosa load is observed. Comparison of detection techniques shows that a large amount of noncultivable or dead bacteria are present in the samples.

Duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy in people with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Respiratory disease is the major cause of mortality and morbidity in cystic fibrosis (CF). Life expectancy of people with CF has increased dramatically in the last 40 years. One of the major reasons for this increase is the mounting use of antibiotics to treat chest exacerbations caused by bacterial infections. The optimal duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy is not clearly defined. Individuals usually receive intravenous antibiotics for 14 days, but treatment may range from 10 to 21 days. A shorter duration of antibiotic treatment risks inadequate clearance of infection which could lead to further lung damage. Prolonged courses of intravenous antibiotics are expensive and inconvenient and the incidence of allergic reactions to antibiotics also increases with prolonged courses. The use of aminoglycosides requires frequent monitoring to avoid some of their side effects. However, some organisms which infect people with CF are known to be multi-resistant to antibiotics, and may require a longer course of treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the optimal duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy for treating chest exacerbations in people with cystic fibrosis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearches of relevant journals, abstract books and conference proceedings.Most recent search of the Group's Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register: 15 November 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing different durations of intravenous antibiotic courses for acute respiratory exacerbations in people with CF, either with the same drugs at the same dosage, the same drugs at a different dosage or frequency or different antibiotics altogether, including studies with additional therapeutic agents.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

No eligible trials were identified.

MAIN RESULTS

No eligible trials were identified.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There are no clear guidelines on the optimum duration of intravenous antibiotic treatment. Duration of treatment is currently based on unit policies and response to treatment. Shorter duration of treatment should improve quality of life and compliance; result in a reduced incidence of drug reactions; and be less costly. However, this may not be sufficient to clear a chest infection and may result in an early recurrence of an exacerbation. This systematic review identifies the need for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial comparing different durations of intravenous antibiotic treatment as it has important clinical and financial implications.

Molecular analysis of changes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa load during treatment of a pulmonary exacerbation in cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Intravenous antibiotics for pulmonary exacerbations (PEs) of cystic fibrosis (CF) usually target Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Insights into the CF lung microbiome have questioned this approach. We used RT-qPCR to determine whether intravenous antibiotics reduced P. aeruginosa numbers and whether this correlated with improved lung function. We also investigated antibiotic effects on other common respiratory pathogens in CF.

METHODS

Sputa were collected from patients when stable and again during a PE. Sputa were expectorated into a RNA preservation buffer for RNA extraction and preparation of cDNA. qPCR was used to enumerate viable P. aeruginosa as well as Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Staphylococcus aureus, Burkholderia cepacia complex and Aspergillus fumigatus.

RESULTS

Fifteen CF patients were followed through 21 PEs. A complete set of serial sputum samples was unavailable for two patients (three separate PEs). P. aeruginosa numbers did not increase immediately prior to a PE, but numbers during intravenous antibiotic treatment were reduced ≥4-log in 6/18 and ≥1-log in 4/18 PEs. In 7/18 PEs, P. aeruginosa numbers changed very little with intravenous antibiotics and one patient demonstrated a ≥2-log increase in P. aeruginosa load. H. influenzae and S. pneumoniae were detected in ten and five PEs respectively, but with antibiotic treatment these bacteria rapidly became undetectable in 6/10 and 4/5 PEs, respectively. There was a negative correlation between P. aeruginosa numbers and FEV1 during stable phase (r(s)=0.75, p<0.05), and reductions in P. aeruginosa load with intravenous antibiotic treatment correlated with improved FEV1 (r(s)=0.52, p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Exacerbations are not due to increased P. aeruginosa numbers in CF adults. However, lung function improvements correlate with reduced P. aeruginosa burden suggesting that current antibiotic treatment strategies remain appropriate in most patients. Improved understanding of PE characterised by unchanged P. aeruginosa numbers and minimal lung function improvement following treatment may allow better targeted therapies.

Duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy in people with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Respiratory disease is the major cause of mortality and morbidity in cystic fibrosis (CF). Life expectancy of people with CF has increased dramatically in the last 40 years. One of the major reasons for this increase is the mounting use of antibiotics to treat chest exacerbations caused by bacterial infections. The optimal duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy is not clearly defined. Individuals usually receive intravenous antibiotics for 14 days, but treatment may range from 10 to 21 days. A shorter duration of antibiotic treatment risks inadequate clearance of infection which could lead to further lung damage. Prolonged courses of intravenous antibiotics are expensive and inconvenient and the incidence of allergic reactions to antibiotics also increases with prolonged courses. The use of aminoglycosides requires frequent monitoring to avoid some of their side effects. However, some organisms which infect people with CF are known to be multi-resistant to antibiotics, and may require a longer course of treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the optimal duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy for treating chest exacerbations in people with cystic fibrosis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearches of relevant journals, abstract books and conference proceedings.Most recent search of the Group's Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register: 3 December 2010.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing different durations of intravenous antibiotic courses for acute respiratory exacerbations in people with CF, either with the same drugs at the same dosage, the same drugs at a different dosage or frequency or different antibiotics altogether, including studies with additional therapeutic agents.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

No eligible trials were identified.

MAIN RESULTS

No eligible trials were identified.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There are no clear guidelines on the optimum duration of intravenous antibiotic treatment. Duration of treatment is currently based on unit policies and response to treatment. Shorter duration of treatment should improve quality of life and compliance; result in a reduced incidence of drug reactions; and be less costly. However, this may not be sufficient to clear a chest infection and may result in an early recurrence of an exacerbation. This systematic review identifies the need for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial comparing different durations of intravenous antibiotic treatment as it has important clinical and financial implications.

Cystic fibrosis pulmonary guidelines: treatment of pulmonary exacerbations

The natural history of cystic fibrosis lung disease is one of chronic progression with intermittent episodes of acute worsening of symptoms frequently called acute pulmonary exacerbations These exacerbations typically warrant medical intervention. It is important that appropriate therapies are recommended on the basis of available evidence of efficacy and safety. The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation therefore established a committee to define the key questions related to pulmonary exacerbations, review the clinical evidence using an evidence-based methodology, and provide recommendations to clinicians. It is hoped that these guidelines will be helpful to clinicians in the treatment of individuals with cystic fibrosis.

Duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy in people with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Respiratory disease is the major cause of mortality and morbidity in cystic fibrosis (CF). Life expectancy of people with CF has increased dramatically in the last 40 years. One of the major reasons for this increase is the mounting use of antibiotics to treat chest exacerbations caused by bacterial infections. The optimal duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy is not clearly defined. Individuals usually receive intravenous antibiotics for 14 days, but treatment may range from 10 to 21 days. A shorter duration of antibiotic treatment risks inadequate clearance of infection which could lead to further lung damage. Prolonged courses of intravenous antibiotics are expensive and inconvenient and the incidence of allergic reactions to antibiotics also increases with prolonged courses. The use of aminoglycosides requires frequent monitoring to avoid some of their side effects. However, some organisms which infect people with CF are known to be multi-resistant to antibiotics, and may require a longer course of treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the optimal duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy for treating chest exacerbations in people with cystic fibrosis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearches of relevant journals, abstract books and conference proceedings. Most recent search of the Group's Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register: February 2008.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing different durations of intravenous antibiotic courses for acute respiratory exacerbations in people with CF, either with the same drugs at the same dosage, the same drugs at a different dosage or frequency or different antibiotics altogether, including studies with additional therapeutic agents.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

No eligible trials were identified.

MAIN RESULTS

No eligible trials were identified.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There are no clear guidelines on the optimum duration of intravenous antibiotic treatment. Duration of treatment is currently based on unit policies and response to treatment. Shorter duration of treatment should improve quality of life and compliance; result in a reduced incidence of drug reactions; and be less costly. However, this may not be sufficient to clear a chest infection and may result in an early recurrence of an exacerbation. This systematic review identifies the need for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial comparing different durations of intravenous antibiotic treatment as it has important clinical and financial implications.

Antibiotic use in Cystic Fibrosis

Chronic pulmonary infections contribute significantly to the morbidity and mortality of patients with CF. The primary pathogens are Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) and Staphylococcus aureus. Hemophilus influenzae has been isolated from a significant number of patients also. A number of the β-lactam and aminoglycoside antibiotics reportedly have altered pharmacokinetic variables in CF. Therapy of acute pulmonary deterioration consists of intravenous antibiotics for two weeks. Antibiotic selection is based on culture and sensitivity results. Currently, the combination of a broad-spectrum penicillin and an aminoglycoside seems to provide the best results. Prophylactic antibiotics are effective if the primary isolates are sensitive to the agents used. Chronic PA infections are problematic because effective oral agents are not available. Aerosolized antibiotics do not improve results over adequate systemic therapy for acute exacerbations. Questions regarding optimal dosages, frequency, and duration of therapy remain.

Single versus combination intravenous antibiotic therapy for people with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Choice of antibiotic, and the use of single or combined therapy are controversial areas in the treatment of respiratory infection in cystic fibrosis (CF). Advantages of combination therapy include wider range of modes of action, possible synergy and reduction of resistant organisms; advantages of monotherapy include lower cost, ease of administration and reduction of drug-related toxicity. Current evidence does not provide a clear answer and the use of intravenous antibiotic therapy in CF requires further evaluation.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of single compared to combination intravenous antibiotic therapy for treating people with CF.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register, comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. Most recent search of the Group's register: January 2004.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing a single intravenous antibiotic with a combination of that antibiotic plus a second antibiotic in people with CF.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-seven trials were identified, of which eight trials (with 356 participants) comparing a single agent to a combination of the same antibiotic and one other, were included. There was a wide variation in the individual antibiotics used in each trial. In total, the trials included seven comparisons of a beta-lactam antibiotic (penicillin-related or third generation cephalosporin) with a beta-lactam-aminoglycoside combination and three comparisons of an aminoglycoside with a beta-lactam-aminoglycoside combination. These two groups of trials were analysed as separate subgroups. There was considerable heterogeneity amongst these trials, leading to difficulties in performing the review and interpreting the results. The meta-analysis did not demonstrate any significant differences between monotherapy and combination therapy, in terms of lung function; symptom scores; adverse effects; and bacteriological outcome measures. These results should be interpreted cautiously. Six of the included trials were published between 1977 and 1988; these were single centre trials with flaws in the randomisation process and small sample size. Overall, the methodological quality was poor.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The results of this review are inconclusive. The review raises important methodological issues. There is a need for an RCT which needs to be well designed in terms of adequate randomisation allocation, blinding, power and long-term follow up. Results need to be standardised to a consistent method of reporting, in order to validate the pooling of results from multiple trials.

Respiratory virus infections in cystic fibrosis

Respiratory virus infections have pronounced and long-lasting effects on patients with cystic fibrosis (CF), resulting in significant declines in FVC, FEV(1) and Shwachman score, significantly increasing both the frequency and duration of hospitalisation. Deleterious effects on patients with CF have been reported for most viruses studied but the effects of respiratory syncytial virus and influenza appear the greatest. There is circumstantial evidence that respiratory virus infections may facilitate bacterial infections, particularly Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates and clinical response to parenteral antibiotic administration: lack of association in cystic fibrosis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the relationship between the antibiotic susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from the sputum of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and the patient's response to parenteral antibiotic administration, we performed a retrospective analysis using data from patients in the placebo arm of a phase 3 trial of tobramycin solution for inhalation. All patients were chronically infected with P aeruginosa. Seventy-seven of the 262 patients receiving placebo experienced a pulmonary exacerbation during the trial for which they received therapy with IV tobramycin and ceftazidime. The susceptibility of the P aeruginosa isolates to ceftazidime and tobramycin was determined at trial enrollment by broth microdilution.

DESIGN

The clinical response to combination antibiotic therapy was assessed by analyzing differences in spirometry before and after antibiotic administration. The FEV(1) percent predicted at the first visit after the conclusion of antibiotic administration was compared to the FEV(1) percent predicted prior to antibiotic therapy. The results were analyzed both descriptively and by regression analyses.

RESULTS

The conditions of 54 patients improved, and those of 9 patients worsened, and in 14 patients there was no change in FEV(1) with antibiotic administration. No correlation was observed between the susceptibility of P aeruginosa to tobramycin or ceftazidime and clinical response. Only the three following variables were observed to significantly correlate with FEV(1) after antibiotic treatment on regression analysis: FEV(1) prior to treatment (p < 0.0001); number of days elapsed between the previous FEV(1) measurement and the initiation of IV antibiotic therapy (p < 0.002); and the number of days elapsed between the determination of the minimum inhibitory concentration and the initiation of IV therapy (p < 0.03). No significant trends were observed between the antibiotic susceptibility of P aeruginosa isolates and treatment outcomes.

CONCLUSION

While lack of statistical significance for a trend between bacterial susceptibilities and the response to parenteral antibiotic administration does not mean that no such trend exists, the precision of the confidence intervals allows us to conclude that even if isolate antibiotic susceptibilities affect outcome, the impact would be small and not clinically relevant.

Defining a pulmonary exacerbation in cystic fibrosis

OBJECTIVES

Despite the central importance of pulmonary exacerbations (PExs) as an outcome measure in cystic fibrosis clinical trials, no standardized definition of PEx exists. We conducted a prospective, multicenter study to establish a standardized PEx definition and score for use in clinical trials, based on clinical status rather than on treatment decisions.

STUDY DESIGN

Subjects were 246 patients enrolled in the placebo arm of a randomized, controlled trial of tobramycin for inhalation. Physician-investigators completed PEx questionnaires on all subjects at scheduled intervals during the 6-month study, indicating new or worsening symptoms, physical examination findings, and impression of PEx status (presence or absence and severity). Logistic regression was used to assess the relative importance of each of the characteristics in predicting a PEx.

RESULTS

We developed 2 PEx scores that use easily ascertained symptoms and chest examination findings; one also includes change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second over the preceding month. Both scores were sensitive and specific for predicting the presence of a PEx (sensitivity, 86%; specificity, 86%). The scores were validated in subjects in the intervention arm of the trial.

CONCLUSION

We hope that the proposed PEx score might serve as a standardized outcome measure for future clinical trials in cystic fibrosis, allowing meaningful comparisons of study results.

Single versus combination intravenous antibiotic therapy for people with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Choice of antibiotic, and the use of single or combined therapy are controversial areas in the treatment of respiratory infection in Cystic Fibrosis (CF). Advantages of combination therapy include wider range of modes of action, possible synergy and reduction of resistant organisms; advantages of monotherapy include lower cost, ease of administration and reduction of drug related toxicity. Current evidence does not provide a clear answer and therefore the use of intravenous antibiotic therapy in CF requires further evaluation.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of single compared to combination intravenous antibiotic therapy in the treatment of patients with CF.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane CF and Genetic Disorders Group Specialised Register of Controlled Trials and the abstract books of the three major CF conferences were searched to identify randomised controlled trials. The register was compiled by conducting detailed computer searches of Medline from 1966-present and Embase 1974-1995.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing a single intravenous antibiotic with a combination of that antibiotic plus a second antibiotic in patients with CF.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of nine studies including 386 patients compared a single agent to a combination of the same antibiotic and one other. There was a wide variation in the individual antibiotics used in each study. In total, the studies included eight comparisons of a beta-lactam antibiotic (penicillin-related or third generation cephalosporin) with a beta-lactam-aminoglycoside combination and three comparisons of an aminoglycoside with a beta-lactam-aminoglycoside combination. These two groups of studies were analysed as separate subgroups. There was considerable heterogeneity amongst these trials which led to difficulties in performing the review and interpreting the results. The meta-analysis did not demonstrate any significant differences between monotherapy and combination therapy, in terms of lung function, symptom scores and adverse effects. Single therapy was associated with an increase in the number of patients with resistant strains of Ps. aeruginosa at two to eight weeks follow-up. This is an important preliminary finding which needs further clarification with a good quality long-term study. These results should be interpreted with caution. All but two of the included trials were published between 1977 and 1988; these were single centre studies with flaws in the randomisation process and small sample size. Overall, the methodological quality was poor.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

The results of this systematic review of monotherapy versus combination therapy for pulmonary exacerbations in CF are inconclusive. The review raises important methodological issues. There is a need for a randomised controlled trial which needs to be well designed in terms of adequate randomisation allocation, blinding, power and long-term follow up. Results need to be standardised to a consistent method of reporting, in order to validate the pooling of results from multiple studies.

[Antibiotic therapy in cystic fibrosis. II Antibiotic strategy]

Antibiotherapy is one of the main treatments of cystic fibrosis, contributing to a better nutritional and respiratory status and a prolonged survival. The choice of antibiotics depends on quantitative and qualitative analysis of sputum, bacteria resistance phenotypes and severity of infection. Haemophilus influenzae infection can be treated orally with the association of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid or a cephalosporin. Staphylococcus aureus generally remains sensitive to usual antibiotics; in case of a methicillin-resistant strain, an oral bitherapy or a parenteral cure can be proposed. Treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is different in case of first colonization or chronic infection: in first colonization, parenteral antibiotherapy (beta-lactams-aminoglycosids) followed by inhaled antibiotherapy may eradicate the bacteria; in chronic infections, exacerbations require parenteral bi-antibiotherapy (beta-lactams or quinolons and aminoglycosids) for 15 to 21 days, inhaled antibiotics between the cures being useful to decrease the number of exacerbation. A careful monitoring of antibiotherapy is necessary because of possible induction of bacterial resistance, nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity of aminosids and allergy to beta-lactams.

Comparison of a beta-lactam alone versus beta-lactam and an aminoglycoside for pulmonary exacerbation in cystic fibrosis

We determined whether a beta-lactam and an aminoglycoside have efficacy greater than a beta-lactam alone in the management of a pulmonary exacerbation in patients with cystic fibrosis.

STUDY DESIGN

Azlocillin and placebo or azlocillin and tobramycin were administered to 76 patients with a pulmonary exacerbation caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a randomized double-blind, third-party monitored protocol. Improvement was assessed by standardized clinical evaluation, pulmonary function testing, sputum bacterial density, sputum DNA content, and time to the next pulmonary exacerbation requiring hospitalization.

RESULTS

No significant difference was seen between the 2 treatment groups in clinical evaluation, sputum DNA concentration, forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in second 1, or peak expiratory flow rate at the end of treatment (33 receiving azlocillin alone and 43 both antibiotics); adverse reactions were equivalent in each group. Sputum P. aeruginosa density decreased more with combination therapy (P =.034). On follow-up evaluation, an average of 26 days after the end of treatment, all outcome indicators had worsened in both groups. Time to readmission for a new pulmonary exacerbation was significantly longer in the group receiving azlocillin plus tobramycin (P <.001). Treatment-emergent tobramycin resistance occurred in both groups and was more frequent with combination therapy.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that the combination of a beta-lactam and an aminoglycoside produces a longer clinical remission than a beta-lactam alone and slightly better initial improvement.

Are antipseudomonal antibiotics really beneficial in acute respiratory exacerbations of cystic fibrosis?

BACKGROUND

Although anti-pseudomonal antibiotics are routinely used in the treatment of acute respiratory exacerbations of adult cystic fibrosis (CF), the specific efficacy of such treatment remains uncertain, the mechanism of action of these agents is not fully understood, and the role of sputum susceptibility testing in clinical decision making is controversial.

AIMS

We investigated the relationship between susceptibility testing and clinical outcome in adult CF patients colonised with Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

METHODS

Sputum samples were collected before, during and after respiratory exacerbations from 31 admissions (17 patients). Sputum colony counts and MIC of P. aeruginosa were performed.

RESULTS

Sputum colony counts did not change significantly during or after intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy. Clinical outcome parameters (lung function, 12-minute walking distance, sputum weight and quality of life) were compared with susceptibility of P. aeruginosa colonies isolated at admission to the antibiotics used, and no correlation was evident. There was no evidence for the development of cross-resistance and there was no change in the proportion of mucoid colonies with therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

While this study has a small patient sample size, it highlights the inconsistency of the role of antipseudomonal drugs also shown in other similar studies. The presence of P. aeruginosa in sputum of acutely ill CF patients prompts us to prescribe i.v. antipseudomonal drugs. If this approach was valid, we would expect to find a reduction in sputum colony counts and improvement in clinical parameters with the use of antibiotics to which the organisms were sensitive. The fact that such a relationship cannot be consistently demonstrated in this and other studies suggests that the use of antipseudomonal therapy in these patients requires more critical bacteriological and clinical evaluation.

C-reactive protein in acute pulmonary exacerbations of patients with cystic fibrosis

C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations were evaluated in 9 cystic fibrosis (CF) patients with acute pulmonary exacerbations and 14 patients with acute exacerbations of asthma without any symptoms of an acute infection. CRP concentrations were serially evaluated over the course of therapy in CF patients and compared with pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and clinical scores. CF patients were treated with aerosolized bronchodilators, intravenous fluids, and chest physiotherapy for 48 hours. Intravenous antibiotic therapy was added after 48 hours. Initial CRP concentrations differed significantly between patients with CF and those with asthma. CRP concentrations were elevated in 7 of 9 CF patients versus 3 of 14 asthma patients (P < 0.02). In CF patients, CRP concentrations did not correlate with PFTs (except on day 0) or clinical scores. Frequently PFTs and clinical scores continued to improve after CRP levels had reached their lowest concentrations. CRP concentrations decreased only after the addition of antibiotic therapy.

Production of elastase, exotoxin A, and alkaline protease in sputa during pulmonary exacerbation of cystic fibrosis in patients chronically infected by Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Secretion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa elastase, exotoxin A, and alkaline protease in sputum during bronchopulmonary exacerbations was examined in 18 cystic fibrosis patients chronically infected with this microorganism. The patients were studied during one or several exacerbation periods necessitating hospitalizations of 12 to 20 days. In all cases, P. aeruginosa was present in bronchial secretions at admission and was not eradicated after treatment. The P. aeruginosa density decreased significantly after antibiotic therapy but remained greater than 10(6) CFU/g of sputum in most cases. Significant amounts of P. aeruginosa exoproteins were measured in total homogenized bronchial secretions by immunoenzymatic assays. The detection of higher levels of exoproteins at admission, the significant decrease after treatment, and the absence of exoproteins during intercrisis phases constituted arguments for a renewal of virulence of P. aeruginosa during exacerbations. Nevertheless, the concomitant changes in bacteria load and the triggering of the inflammatory process and immune complex formation could also contribute to pulmonary exacerbations.

Cystic fibrosis

While the care of cystic fibrosis (CF) patients has been mainly the province of pediatricians, great improvements in the therapy and life span of CF patients often results in their transition to care by adult physicians. In this review of CF, we begin with an overview of the epidemiology and genetics of the disease, with a discussion of the recently found ion abnormalities that lead to the clinical manifestations. This is followed by a discussion of the pathophysiology. Methods of diagnosis, ranging from the gold standard, the sweat test, to recent advances based on a greater understanding of the genetics of the disease are reviewed. This is followed by a discussion of therapy primarily geared to the treatment of the respiratory complications, as they are the most common lethal factors of the disease. We point out controversies where they exist. Newer forms of therapy such as lung transplantation are discussed, and we finish with a discussion about future therapeutic modalities, some of which are being approved as the paper is in print.

Pulmonary retention of free and liposome-encapsulated tobramycin after intratracheal administration in uninfected rats and rats infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa

The pulmonary residence time of free and liposome-encapsulated tobramycin was studied with uninfected rats and rats infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Chronic infection in lungs was established by intratracheal administration of 10(8) CFU of P. aeruginosa PA 508 prepared in agar beads. After 3 days, a single dose (300 micrograms) of free or liposome-encapsulated tobramycin was given intratracheally to both infected and uninfected rats. At various time intervals (0.25 to 16 h) after drug instillations, the remaining tobramycin was evaluated in blood, lungs, and kidneys by a microbiological assay. Intratracheal instillation of liposome-encapsulated tobramycin resulted in high and sustained levels of tobramycin in lungs of uninfected and infected rats over the 16-h period studied; however, the tobramycin levels were two times higher in uninfected rats. There was no tobramycin detected in the blood or kidneys from these animals. In contrast, the intratracheally instilled free tobramycin was cleared within 3 and 1 h from the lungs of uninfected and infected animals, respectively. These data suggest that the encapsulation of tobramycin in liposomes can result in a significant increase of its residence time within lungs. This study also shows that pulmonary infection was associated with a lowering of tobramycin levels in lungs.

Outcome measures for clinical trials in cystic fibrosis. Summary of a Cystic Fibrosis Foundation consensus conference

The CFF Consensus Conference concluded with a summary of those outcome measures that would be most useful in studies of patients 6 years of age and older and those measures that would be most useful in studies of the younger population (< 6 years of age) (Table). These measures were further divided into biologic markers most appropriate for initial (phase I and phase II) clinical trials and those especially useful in large, multicenter (phase III) pivotal trials. There is an ongoing need to improve the accuracy and validity of currently available measures of biologic activity and clinical efficacy in CF, especially in the younger population. The conference participants recommended that the following eight issues be addressed as soon as possible: (1) definition of pulmonary exacerbation, (2) broadly applicable methods of testing pulmonary function in small children (ideally a single test for all ages), (3) a comprehensive severity-of-disease score for young children, (4) reliable methods of quantifying chest x-ray and CT scan changes in young patients, (5) simple, inexpensive measures of lung inflammation, (6) a centralized, uniform approach to the establishment of data monitoring committees, (7) a quality of well-being scale for small children, and (8) reliable, reproducible aerosol delivery systems with defined characteristics. In addition, participants recommended that better methods be developed for assessing patients' adherence to research protocols.

C-reactive protein is not a useful indicator of intermittent bacterial colonization in early lung disease of patients with cystic fibrosis

C-reactive protein (CRP) is a general marker of the systemic inflammatory response to bacterial infection. Serial measurement of CRP is useful in monitoring respiratory exacerbations in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and chronic infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. We hypothesized that regular monitoring of CRP in young children with CF prior to colonization with P. aeruginosa might provide an objective guide to the need for antibiotic treatment. Twenty-two children were studied prospectively over a 6 month period. We measured CRP every 2 months and at the beginning and end of respiratory exacerbations. In samples taken when the children were well, median CRP was 0.45 microgram/mL compared with 1.92 micrograms/mL when they were symptomatic with positive culture results (P < 0.05). Despite this difference there was considerable overlap between CRP levels for infected and noninfected patients. A CRP value of > 1.82 micrograms/mL (the upper 95% confidence interval for a control group of well children without CF) had a sensitivity of 49% and a specificity of 83% in determining a symptomatic exacerbation. We conclude that in this group of patients CRP measurements were of little value in monitoring respiratory exacerbations in patients who become intermittently infected with either Haemophilus influenzae or Staphylococcus aureus.

Changes in nocturnal oximetry after treatment of exacerbations in cystic fibrosis

Sleep related arterial oxygen desaturation has been described in clinically stable young adults with cystic fibrosis. The incidence and severity of nocturnal oxygen desaturation in children during infective exacerbations and the changes that occur with treatment were examined. Forty five children with proved cystic fibrosis, median age 8.9 years, admitted to the Regional Cystic Fibrosis Unit underwent clinical evaluation, spirometry, and measurement of peak flow and nocturnal oxygen saturation on admission and after 10 days' treatment. There was a significant improvement in all the above measurements, with the averaged overnight saturation changing from a mean (SD) 92.7 (2.7)% to 94.3 (2.0)%, mean (SE) difference 1.58 (0.37). The time spent with a saturation 4% or more below their clinic value showed a marked improvement from 122 (152) minutes on the first night to 21 (30.7) on the second, mean (SE) difference 101 (22.4). Eight young children could not perform pulmonary function tests, all desaturated on the admission night. Nocturnal hypoxaemia is a common finding in young cystic fibrosis patients during infective exacerbations but improves with treatment. Overnight oximetry is simple to perform, well tolerated, and identifies patients with marked nocturnal desaturation.

Mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a marker of poor survival in cystic fibrosis

The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic significance of mucoid and non-mucoid isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (muPs and non-muPs) from the sputa of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Eighty-one children with CF who coughed up sputum daily were recruited and followed over 12 months with frequent sputum cultures. At the end of this observation period they were classified to one of three age-matched groups. In 50 mPs was isolated on one or more occasions; 19 grew non-muPs but not muPs, and 12 grew no isolates of Ps aeruginosa. These 81 children and adolescents were followed for a further 8 years or until they died. Twenty-one (42%) of the muPs patients died compared with two (11%) of the non-muPs and one (8%) of the no Ps patients (P less than 0.01). Stepwise regression indicated that forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) had the main predictive effect but that age, Shwachman score and muPs also had a predictive effect. Identification of mucoid forms of Ps aeruginosa is an unfavorable prognostic factor but the isolation of non-mucoid strains does not appear to be any more important than the isolation of other common respiratory pathogens.

Cystic fibrosis. Infection and immunity to Pseudomonas

Chronic pulmonary infection with P. aeruginosa in CF may result from: 1. An initial failure of clearance mechanisms (increased adherence) leading to the development of a highly compartmentalized inflammatory reaction; 2. Inhibition of clearing mechanisms for bacteria present in the bronchial lumen; and 3. A largely ineffective, and possibly damaging, hyperactivity of inflammatory cells in the lumen and bronchial wall. The special relationship between the CF host and P. aeruginos, always long-term, and frequently subtle in its complexity, needs further understanding in order to develop new strategies for the treatment of chronic lung infections with this organism.

Antibacterial therapy in cystic fibrosis

Bacterial lung infections determine the prognosis for most cystic fibrosis patients. The antibacterial therapy is difficult because of the host-bacterium interaction and altered pharmacokinetics. The new insights in the working mechanisms of antibiotics that may lead to better treatment results have been discussed, and guidelines for treatment of lung infections in cystic fibrosis patients were given.

Pulmonary function and clinical course in patients with cystic fibrosis after pulmonary colonization with Pseudomonas aeruginosa

To evaluate the relationship between Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization and the development of lung disease, we studied 895 patients who attended our cystic fibrosis clinic between 1975 and 1988. The prevalence of P. aeruginosa colonization was 82%. Patients who acquired P. aeruginosa in the first year of life had a similar 10-year survival rate (85%) to that in patients who were colonized between the ages of 1 and 7 years (87%), and to that in patients colonized after the age of 7 years (78%). One year before colonization, mean age, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity, and forced expiratory flow in the mid-expiratory phase were similar to those in a group of patients who remained free of P. aeruginosa. No significant change in pulmonary function variables could be demonstrated 1 year and 2 years after the colonization. The rate and duration of hospitalization did not increase in the years after P. aeruginosa colonization compared with the years before colonization. By the age of 7 years, the mean percentage of predicted FEV1 was lower by 10% in patients who were already colonized by P. aeruginosa compared with those who were not colonized (p less than 0.01). A similar reduction in FEV1 was observed at all ages from 7 to 35 years, but no precipitate rate of decline in FEV1 could be associated with P. aeruginosa colonization. We conclude that although P. aeruginosa colonization is associated with 10% lower lung function, it does not cause an immediate and rapid reduction, as has been previously reported. The clinical course and the pulmonary deterioration in cystic fibrosis after P. aeruginosa colonization is a gradual and variable process.

Reduction of sputum Pseudomonas aeruginosa density by antibiotics improves lung function in cystic fibrosis more than do bronchodilators and chest physiotherapy alone

We evaluated patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and moderate obstructive lung disease in pulmonary exacerbation in a double-blind placebo-controlled trial to determine the contribution of antibiotic-mediated reduction in sputum bacterial density to clinical improvement. For the first 4 days of study, all patients received bronchodilating aerosols and chest physiotherapy but no antibiotics. During this time, the patients showed significant improvement in mean FVC, FEV1, and maximal midexpiratory flow rate (FEF25-75). In 12 of 13 trials, the patients showed no significant increases in the density of Pseudomonas aeruginosa during these first 4 days. In these 12 trials, the patients were stratified by their initial FVC and randomized to receive either parenteral tobramycin and ticarcillin (n = 7) or placebo (n = 5), in addition to continued aerosol and chest physiotherapy. In the remaining trial, the patient had a significant rise in the density of P. aeruginosa and was assigned to the antibiotic group. During the next 14 days of therapy, the antibiotic group showed significantly (p less than 0.01) greater reductions in log10 colony-forming units (cfu) of P. aeruginosa per gram of sputum and greater increases in FVC, FEV1, and FEF25-75 than did the placebo group. The degree of decrease in log10 cfu P. aeruginosa/g sputum correlated significantly (p less than 0.001) with the degree of improvement in FVC, FEV1, and FEF25-75.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The impact of respiratory viral infections in patients with cystic fibrosis

Respiratory viruses have been implicated in pulmonary exacerbations of CF and in the long-term course of pulmonary dysfunction in these patients. However, the data are by no means complete and there is the clear need for more intensive evaluations of the role of viral pathogens in this population. Further controlled prospective studies assessing the impact of viral infections in large cohorts of patients with CF are still necessary. Placebo-controlled, antiviral treatment protocols also should be initiated. In clinical practice at the present time, patients with CF should be assessed for respiratory viral infections, at least at the time of hospitalizations for pulmonary deterioration. This assessment should include obtaining specimens from the respiratory tract for viral cultures and rapid respiratory viral antigen detection. Identifying a respiratory viral infection may alter clinical care. The patient can be isolated appropriately, and it may be possible to reduce the intensive use of expensive and potentially toxic parenteral antibiotics. The role of antiviral therapy in these patients must await further evaluations. The mechanisms of the short- and long-term effects of respiratory viruses in patients with CF have not been defined. However, pathophysiologic studies conducted in normal children and adults allow the development of several plausible hypotheses. The definition of mechanisms of injury in this population must be a priority, since it may influence clinical practice. If airway obstruction is the principal mechanism of viral-induced injury, therapeutic approaches designed to relieve the obstruction would be most appropriate. For example, if the obstruction resulted from induced or aggravated reactive airway disease, the current common practice of prescribing chronic bronchodilator therapy would be appropriate. This therapy might be especially suited to those experiencing frequent viral infections. In addition, the administration of bronchodilators to patients during acute exacerbations of pulmonary disease caused by viruses might be of clinical benefit. If, on the other hand, the principal mechanism of viral-induced injury is found to be through synergistic interaction with bacteria, the current practice of aggressive antimicrobial therapy would remain appropriate.

Treatment of pseudomonas aeruginosa colonisation in cystic fibrosis

To test whether early treatment could postpone the chronic colonisation of the respiratory tract with mucoid strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in patients with cystic fibrosis, we performed a pilot study in 28 patients aged 2 to 18 years. A two week course of azlocillin (150 mg/kg/day) and tobramycin (10 to 15 mg/kg/day) was given after a mean duration of P aeruginosa colonisation of five months (range one to 11 months). Weight for height increased significantly by 3.5% (SEM 0.7%) of the predicted normal after chemotherapy. The eradication of P aeruginosa that was achieved in 18 children directly after hospital treatment was only temporary. Samples from only 10 and five patients remained negative three and six months after treatment, respectively. Five children remained free from P aeruginosa for a prolonged period of 14 to 32 months. We conclude that, apart from the clinical improvement in all patients, some children might benefit from early antipseudomonas treatment with respect to the bacteriological outcome. Most children, however, experience only a temporary reduction in colonisation. Further investigations in form of controlled clinical trials seem justified.

Antimicrobial therapy against Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Pseudomonas cepacia

The aims of antimicrobial therapy extend beyond short-term bacterial killing to long-term maintenance of weight and lung function. A review of antimicrobial drug trials shows that empiricism is still ahead of science and more studies are needed both to justify current practice and to make future changes logical.

Individualized aminoglycoside dosage regimens in patients with cystic fibrosis

Individualized dosage regimens have recently been recommended for patients treated with aminoglycoside antibiotics. We have developed a calculator-based program for our patients with cystic fibrosis and have studied 93 courses of intravenous aminoglycoside treatment, comparing predicted and measured values in 45 courses. Pharmacokinetic parameters differed notably among subjects: this was reflected by widely variable total daily aminoglycoside dosage requirements. The mean daily dosage requirements (+/- SD) for tobramycin (62 treatment courses) was 13.0 +/- 3.74 mg/kg, and for gentamicin (26 treatment courses) was 11.5 +/- 2.6 mg/kg. The accuracy of the program was evaluated by its ability to predict peak and trough values in individuals: 84 percent of measured peaks were within 2 micrograms/ml of the predicted level. Nephrotoxicity was observed in one patient, ototoxicity in three. This program provides a simple, safe, and effective method of tailoring an aminoglycoside regimen to the patient's needs.

Sputum changes associated with therapy for endobronchial exacerbation in cystic fibrosis

We sought to define objective indicators of the resolution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa endobronchial infection in patients with cystic fibrosis. We prospectively studied 75 patients admitted for treatment of a pulmonary exacerbation and quantitated sputum bacterial density, DNA content, and the concentration of albumin and total protein in sputum, and compared these values with clinical evaluation. Eleven of the 75 patients had systemic signs, fever, and leukocytosis, which we arbitrarily defined as due to endobronchial infection. At the end of hospitalization, these 11 patients were afebrile, had peripheral leukocyte counts in the normal range, and were judged improved. Sputum P. aeruginosa density, DNA content, and total protein content on admission were similar in the two illness groups. Hospitalization and parenteral antibiotic administration for an average of 14.6 days were associated with improved pulmonary function in all 75 subjects (P values for forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume at 1 second, and peak expiratory flow rate were all less than 0.001). With improvement, there was a decrease in sputum P. aeruginosa density (mean of both groups decreased from 10(7.80) CFU/g on admission to 10(5.96) CFU/g; P less than 0.001), and a decreased DNA concentration (overall mean 4.73 +/- 4.75 on admission to 2.76 +/- 2.49 mg/g; P less than 0.002). The decrease in sputum total protein concentration for both groups was not significant (overall mean 60.5 +/- 48.4 to 43.9 +/- 38.2 mg/g; P = 0.06). Sputum albumin concentrations did not change in either group. We conclude that in cystic fibrosis subjects with a pulmonary exacerbation, bacterial density, sputum DNA and protein content decrease with hospitalization and parenteral antibiotic therapy. At the end of treatment, these indices of sputum infection and inflammation correlate with improved pulmonary function and clinical improvement. These changes are independent of the presence or absence of fever on admission.

Comparison of piperacillin alone versus piperacillin plus tobramycin for treatment of respiratory infections in children with cystic fibrosis

Seventeen patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and pulmonary exacerbations were randomly assigned to two treatment groups: piperacillin 600 mg/kg/day (P), and piperacillin 600 mg/kg/day plus tobramycin (PT), in order to determine the safety and pharmacokinetics of high-dose piperacillin and whether piperacillin alone was effective for the treatment of Pseudomonas infections. The mean half-life of piperacillin was 0.54 hours, with a peak concentration of 232 micrograms/ml. No differences between P and PT groups were noted in clinical assessment, as judged by Shwachman scores, pulmonary function testing, or weight gain. However, during the course of treatment, quantitative sputum cultures decreased by greater than 10(2) colony-forming units in only 5 out of 19 Pseudomonas isolates from the P group, compared with 12 of 19 isolates from the PT group (P less than 0.03, Chi-square). Although emergence of resistance was not seen, one isolate had an increase in minimum inhibitory concentration from 8 to 128 micrograms/ml. There were no serious adverse reactions to piperacillin; only one patient developed fever possibly related to piperacillin. Therapy with high-dose piperacillin was safe in children with CF. Treatment with piperacillin alone was less effective than combination therapy with gentamicin for reduction in titer of Pseudomonas in sputum. However, the role of antimicrobial agents in the treatment of CF remains undefined. A double-blind placebo-controlled trial is indicated.

Randomized trial of ceftazidime versus placebo in the management of acute respiratory exacerbations in patients with cystic fibrosis

A randomized trial of ceftazidime versus placebo was conducted in patients with cystic fibrosis hospitalized for acute respiratory exacerbations. Patients 12 years of age or older were included if they had mild to moderately severe illness according to the following criteria: erythrocyte sedimentation rate less than or equal to 50 mm/hr and less than three other abnormalities (leukocyte count greater than or equal to 15,000/microliter, pulse greater than or equal to 100 beats/min, respirations greater than or equal to 30/min, or temperature greater than or equal to 38.5 degrees C). In all 16 episodes treated with ceftazidime, the patients were rated improved in comparison with 10 of 12 patients treated with placebo. Three placebo-treated patients dropped out of the study within 3 to 5 days because they wanted antibiotic therapy. None of the 15 placebo-treated patients showed clinical deterioration. There were no significant differences in rate of improvement of symptom score, weight gain, or pulmonary function between the two treatment groups. There was no difference in the course during the 6 to 24 months after the study period. Intravenous antibiotics are not essential in the management of all acute respiratory exacerbations of mild to moderate severity in patients with cystic fibrosis.

Efficacy of inhaled amikacin as adjunct to intravenous combination therapy (ceftazidime and amikacin) in cystic fibrosis

Eighty-seven patients with cystic fibrosis were admitted to hospital with an acute exacerbation of pulmonary symptoms associated with isolation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from sputum. The patients were randomly allocated to receive intravenously administered ceftazidime (250 mg/kg/day) and amikacin (33 mg/kg/day) alone or with inhaled amikacin (100 mg twice a day). Other aspects of the 2-week treatment were constant. The two therapy groups were comparable in all aspects. At the completion of therapy, the addition of aerosolized amikacin produced temporary eradication of P. aeruginosa in 70% of the patients, compared with 41% in the intravenous therapy only group (P less than 0.02). Suppression of P. aeruginosa in sputum cultures was correlated with the amikacin sputum concentrations. However, both regimens resulted in similar improvements in clinical, radiologic, laboratory, and pulmonary function measurements, and within 4 to 6 weeks most patients were recolonized with P. aeruginosa. There was no serious toxicity or adverse effect. In patients with cystic fibrosis, the addition of aerosol aminoglycoside to systemic antipseudomonal combination therapy is not clinically beneficial.