Upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy in the pediatric patient

Digestive endoscopy in neonates

Since the introduction of flexible fiberoptic endoscopy in the early 1970s, esophagogastro-duodenoscopy and colonoscopy have become established procedures for the diagnosis, evaluation and treatment of gastrointestinal tract disease in the pediatric population. The development of safe fiberoptic endoscopes specially designed for neonates has allowed visualization of lesions occurring in the first days of life. Despite an increased understanding of neonatal digestive disorders deriving from this new diagnostic modality, there is little consensus on the appropriate use of endoscopic procedures in routine care of neonates. It is the feeling of the authors that widening the indications of endoscopy in the neonatal period might lead to diagnosis of discrete clinical abnormalities, which might improve the care of neonates. The techniques for performing neonatal endoscopies, the appropriate indications, the common normal and pathologic findings and the complications of these procedures are reviewed.

Comparison of fentanyl versus meperidine for analgesia in pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy

This study compared the safety and efficacy of fentanyl and meperidine for analgesia in pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy. In a double-blind, randomized trial, 24 patients (11 males) received either fentanyl (1 microg/kg) or meperidine (1 mg/kg). These analgesics were administered in unmarked syringes by an investigator who did not participate in the procedure or in the evaluation of the patient's sedation. There were 17 Caucasians and 7 African-Americans whose mean age was 10.4 +/- 4.4 years. Thirteen patients received meperidine and 11 received fentanyl. Midazolam was given to all patients as needed to provide sufficient sedation for the procedure. Study subjects underwent EGD (n = 17) or colonoscopy (n = 7). There were no differences as assessed by patient, endoscopist, or assistant for tolerance, discomfort, procedure ease, recovery time, complications, heart rate, blood pressure, or oxygen saturation. We conclude that meperidine and fentanyl are equally effective in providing analgesia for pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Etiopathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease: the importance of the pediatric perspective

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is now recognized as a common chronic disease affecting children and adolescents. This article will review recent advances made in the fields of genetics, epidemiology, gut ecology, and immunology regarding the etiopathogenesis of IBD, with particular emphasis on the contributions made by pediatric studies. Areas where further study of the pediatric age group would be beneficial will be highlighted.

Oxygen saturation during esophagogastroduodenoscopy in children: general anesthesia versus intravenous sedation

BACKGROUND

Hypoxia may occur in children undergoing upper digestive endoscopy under sedation. The purpose of this study was to compare the occurrence of desaturation during intravenous sedation with that which occurs during general anesthesia.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients between 3 months and 6 years old underwent a diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy under sedation (n = 18) or general anesthesia (n = 18). Oxygen pulse oximetry, heart rate, and mean arterial pressure were monitored throughout the procedure. At the end of the procedure, the operator gave the value of the endoscopy satisfaction score on a scale of I (very good conditions) to IV (impossible procedure).

RESULTS

The minimum oxygen pulse oximetry value was significantly lower in the sedation group compared with that in the general anesthesia group (89 +/- 5 vs. 97 +/- 1; p < 0.001). In the general anesthesia group, the oxygen pulse oximetry level declined to less than 95% in only one child; but in the sedation group, it declined to less than 95% in 16 patients (5.5% vs. 89%). Nine patients had a profound desaturation in sedation group (oxygen pulse oximetry < 90%); no patients in the general anesthesia group had desaturation (50% vs. 0%). In the general anesthesia group, heart rate and mean arterial pressure remained stable during the whole procedure, whereas in the sedation group, heart rate and mean arterial pressure increased significantly during the procedure. The endoscopy satisfaction score was I in all 18 patients in the general anesthesia group, whereas in the sedation group, it was I in only 2 patients, II in 8 patients, and III in 10 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These results confirm that hypoxia during upper digestive endoscopy in patients under sedation is a frequent occurrence in children. When compared with sedation, general anesthesia is a safer technique that prevents hypoxia and allows the gastroenterologist to perform the endoscopy under better conditions.

Use of conscious sedation for lower and upper gastrointestinal endoscopic examinations in children, adolescents, and young adults: a twelve-year review

BACKGROUND

Over the past decade, many pediatric endoscopists have replaced general anesthesia with conscious sedation. Sedation is commonly used to minimize discomfort.

METHODS

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of conscious sedation we reviewed 2711 reports of lower and upper gastrointestinal endoscopic examinations performed in 2026 patients between July 1981 and December 1992.

RESULTS

Intravenous sedation was accomplished using meperidine and diazepam (914 examinations, 35%) or meperidine and midazolam (1427 examinations, 55%). Single agents were used for 83 examinations (3%), and 96 examinations (3.5%) were performed with the patient under general anesthesia. In the lower endoscopy group sedated intravenously (n = 713), the cecum was reached in 82% of examinations. The procedure could not be completed in 17 cases in which patients were uncooperative despite sedation. In the upper endoscopy group sedated intravenously (N = 1653), all but 91 endoscopies were completed to the descending duodenum. Esophagoscopy had been planned in 76% of these procedures. Minor complications occurred in 7 patients (0.3%). This included two episodes of significant oxygen desaturation that responded to oxygen administration and narcotic reversal. A major complication occurred in 1 patient (0.04%) who had a gastric perforation during esophageal dilation over a defective guide wire. There were no deaths, episodes of cardiorespiratory arrest, or pulmonary aspirations in our series. The combined major and minor complication rate was 0.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous conscious sedation is safe and effective in children undergoing endoscopic examination of the gastrointestinal tract. Selected patients will require general anesthesia.

Paediatric upper gastro-intestinal endoscopy in developing countries

A retrospective study of 200 endoscopies performed on 168 children (90 girls and 78 boys) aged 3 months to 18 years (median 6 years) is reported. All procedures were completed successfully in an adult endoscopy unit in a comprehensive health centre. Most children of less than 6 months and above 12 years of age needed no intravenous sedation. One child developed respiratory depression and was successfully resuscitated. Indications for endoscopy were: small intestinal biopsy, 78 (46%); recurrent abdominal pain, 40 (24%); acute epigastric pain, 13 (8%); persistent vomiting, 12 (7%); haemorrhage, 10 (6%); caustic substance ingestion, six (4%); and dysphagia, four (2%) children. Positive diagnoses were obtained in 123 (62%) procedures. Coeliac disease (26 cases) was the most common histological diagnosis, followed by gastritis (19 cases), oesophagitis (18 cases), duodenitis (16 cases), duodenal ulcer (11 cases), hiatus hernia (six cases), gastric ulcer (three cases) and oesophageal stricture (two cases). Where specialized paediatric endoscopy units are not feasible, e.g. in developing countries, endoscopic services for children can be safely provided by paediatric endoscopists as part of an adult endoscopy service, provided that suitable resuscitation equipment is available and the necessary modifications to meet the medical and psychological needs of children and their parents are taken into consideration.

Chronic pancreatitis in late childhood and adolescence

Acute pancreatitis is unusual in pediatric patients, and chronic pancreatitis is even less common. Between 1983 and 1988, we diagnosed 24 patients in late childhood and adolescence with chronic pancreatitis. Our review revealed that chronic pancreatitis presents as recurrent abdominal pain in late childhood and adolescence. Individual laboratory and radiological investigations may be normal during acute exacerbations of pain, but the determination of serum amylase and lipase concentrations--combined with ultrasonography--will accurately identify most patients. We found that endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is a valuable tool in the diagnosis of structural abnormalities. Surgical intervention may reduce symptoms in patients with structural abnormalities. There is a tendency toward decreased frequency and severity of pain as the patients increase in age.

A clinical study of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in Japanese children

A total of 370 children who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (534 procedures) were retrospectively studied. All procedures were performed successfully. Side effects were demonstrated in only one case (0.2%), which was complicated by perioral cyanosis during the procedure. As to pre-endoscopic medication, it was thought that topical pharyngeal anesthesia alone may well be used for school-age children over 7 years of age, general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation for neonates, and intravenous sedation for infants and younger children. Of 370 patients studied, 70.8% had endoscopic diagnoses. The most common diagnosis was gastritis (136 cases), followed by peptic ulcer (75), duodenitis (29), and esophagitis (20). Several conclusions for indications were drawn from the present study. Pediatric upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is a safe and useful method for diagnostic and therapeutic approach, if adequate pre-endoscopic medication is chosen.

Transesophageal echocardiographic guidance of transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect

Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect (ASD) was accomplished in 10 of 11 patients aged 13 months to 46 years (weight range 11 to 77 kg). Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was used simultaneously with fluoroscopic imaging in 4 of these patients aged 4.5 to 46 years (weight range 19 to 77 kg). TEE was used to ascertain defect size, position and number of defects and to ascertain appropriate seating of the defect occluder within the atrial defect. In 2 patients TEE-assisted transcatheter ASD closure was accomplished after previous attempts at transcatheter ASD closure, unaided by TEE, had been unsuccessful. The only unsuccessful ASD closure procedure occurred in the smallest patient in the series (an 11-kg 13-month-old), a child who was too small to undergo TEE using our 11-mm diameter endoscopic probe. The concomitant use of TEE with fluoroscopic imaging provides information that is unique and complementary and may improve the efficacy and safety of the transcatheter technique for ASD closure. The recent availability of a 7-mm diameter TEE probe will extend the use of TEE into the infant age group and may decrease the discomfort and potential morbidity of TEE in older patients.