Effect of omeprazole in the treatment of refractory acid-related diseases in childhood: endoscopic healing and twenty-four-hour intragastric acidity

The updated JSPGHAN guidelines for the management of Helicobacter pylori infection in childhood

The Japan Pediatric Helicobacter pylori Study Group published the first guidelines on childhood H. pylori infection in 1997. They were later revised by the Japanese Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (JSPGHAN). The H. pylori eradication rates, when employing triple therapy with amoxicillin and clarithromycin, currently recommended as the first-line therapy of H. pylori infection in Japan, have substantially decreased, creating an important clinical problem worldwide. In Japanese adults, the "test-and-treat" strategy for H. pylori infection is under consideration as an approach for gastric cancer prevention. However, the combined North American and European pediatric guidelines have rejected such a strategy for asymptomatic children. As risk for gastric cancer development is high in Japan, determining whether the "test-and-treat" strategy can be recommended in children has become an urgent matter. Accordingly, the JSPGHAN has produced a second revision of the H. pylori guidelines, which includes discussion about the issues mentioned above. They consist of 19 clinical questions and 34 statements. An H. pylori culture from gastric biopsies is recommended, not only as a diagnostic test for active infection but for antimicrobial susceptibility testing to optimize eradication therapy. Based upon antimicrobial susceptibility testing of H. pylori strains (especially involving clarithromycin), an eradication regimen including use of the antibiotics to which H. pylori is susceptible is recommended as the first-line therapy against H. pylori-associated diseases. The guidelines recommend against a "test-and-treat" strategy for H. pylori infection for asymptomatic children to protect against the development of gastric cancer because there has been no evidence supporting this strategy.

GERD in Neonates and Pediatrics: Use of Omeprazole

Gastroesophageal reflux is a common disorder found in infants and children. Treatment modalities include conservative measures, medications, and surgery. Histamine2 receptor antagonists alone or in combination with prokinetic agents are the first-line medical options, but the addition of prokinetic agents or a change to proton pump inhibitors is reasonable. Corrective fundoplication is reserved as the last-line treatment strategy. The use of proton pump inhibitors such as omeprazole for acid suppression has been studied in children, and a stable, extemporaneous formulation can be prepared. Despite limited data in pediatrics, omeprazole appears to be safe and effective for treating reflux and for decreasing the need for fundoplication.

Pharmacokinetics and Acid-suppressive Effects of Esomeprazole in Infants 1-24 Months Old With Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the pharmacokinetics and acid-suppressive effects of esomeprazole in infants with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this single-blind, randomized, parallel-group study, 50 infants 1 to 24 months old with symptoms of GERD, and ≥ 5% of time with intraesophageal pH <4 during 24-hour dual pH monitoring, received oral esomeprazole 0.25 mg/kg (n = 26) or 1 mg/kg (n = 24) once daily for 1 week. Intraesophageal and intragastric pH were recorded at 1 week, and blood samples were taken for pharmacokinetic analysis.

RESULTS

At baseline, mean percentages of time with intragastric pH > 4 and intraesophageal pH < 4 were 30.5% and 11.6%, respectively, in the esomeprazole 0.25 mg/kg group and 28.6% and 12.5% in the esomeprazole 1 mg/kg group. After 1 week of treatment, times with intragastric pH >4 were 47.9% and 69.3% in the esomeprazole 0.25 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg groups, respectively (P < 0.001 vs baseline), and times with intraesophageal pH < 4 were 8.4% (P < 0.05 vs baseline) and 5.5% (P < 0.001 vs. baseline), respectively. The mean number of acid reflux episodes of > 5 minutes duration decreased from 6 at baseline to 3 and 2 with esomeprazole 0.25 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg, respectively. The geometric mean AUC0-t of esomeprazole were 0.24 and 1.79 μmol · h/L for the 0.25 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg dosages of esomeprazole, respectively. Both esomeprazole dosages were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral treatment with esomeprazole 0.25 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg was well tolerated and provided dose-related acid suppression, dose-related exposure to esomeprazole, and decreased esophageal acid exposure in infants 1-24 months old with GERD.

Pharmacological treatment of children with gastro-oesophageal reflux

BACKGROUND

Gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) is a common disorder, characterised by regurgitation of gastric contents into the oesophagus. GOR is a very common presentation in infancy in both primary and secondary care settings. GOR can affect approximately 50% of infants younger than three months old (Nelson 1997). The natural history of GOR in infancy is generally that of a functional, self-limiting condition that improves with age; < 5% of children with vomiting or regurgitation continue to have symptoms after infancy (Martin 2002). Older children and children with co-existing medical conditions can have a more protracted course. The definition of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) and its precise distinction from GOR are debated, but consensus guidelines from the North American Society of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (NASPGHAN-ESPGHAN guidelines 2009) define GORD as 'troublesome symptoms or complications of GOR.'

OBJECTIVES

This Cochrane review aims to provide a robust analysis of currently available pharmacological interventions used to treat children with GOR by assessing all outcomes indicating benefit or harm.

SEARCH METHODS

We sought to identify relevant published trials by searching the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2014, Issue 5), MEDLINE and EMBASE (1966 to 2014), the Centralised Information Service for Complementary Medicine (CISCOM), the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) Science Citation Index (on BIDS-UK General Science Index) and the ISI Web of Science. We also searched for ongoing trials in the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com).Reference lists from trials selected by electronic searching were handsearched for relevant paediatric studies on medical treatment of children with gastro-oesophageal reflux, as were published abstracts from conference proceedings (published in Gut and Gastroenterology) and reviews published over the past five years.No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Abstracts were reviewed by two review authors, and relevant RCTs on study participants (birth to 16 years) with GOR receiving a pharmacological treatment were selected. Subgroup analysis was considered for children up to 12 months of age, and for children 12 months to 16 years of age, and for those with neurological impairment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Trials were critically appraised and data collected by two review authors. Risk of bias was assessed. Meta-analysis data were independently extracted by two review authors, and suitable outcome data were analysed using RevMan.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 24 studies (1201 participants) contributed data to the review. The review authors had several concerns regarding the studies. Pharmaceutical company support for manuscript preparation was a common feature; also, because common endpoints were lacking, study populations were heterogenous and variations in study design were noted, individual drug meta-analysis was not possible.Moderate-quality evidence from individual studies suggests that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can reduce GOR symptoms in children with confirmed erosive oesophagitis. It was not possible to demonstrate statistical superiority of one PPI agent over another.Some evidence indicates that H₂antagonists are effective in treating children with GORD. Methodological differences precluded performance of meta-analysis on individual agents or on these agents as a class, in comparison with placebo or head-to-head versus PPIs, and additional studies are required.RCT evidence is insufficient to permit assessment of the efficacy of prokinetics. Given the diversity of study designs and the heterogeneity of outcomes, it was not possible to perform a meta-analysis of the efficacy of domperidone.In younger children, the largest RCT of 80 children (one to 18 months of age) with GOR showed no evidence of improvement in symptoms and 24-hour pH probe, but improvement in symptoms and reflux index was noted in a subgroup treated with domperidone and co-magaldrox(Maalox(®) ). In another RCT of 17 children, after eight weeks of therapy. 33% of participants treated with domperidone noted an improvement in symptoms (P value was not significant). In neonates, the evidence is even weaker; one RCT of 26 neonates treated with domperidone over 24 hours showed that although reflux frequency was significantly increased, reflux duration was significantly improved.Diversity of RCT evidence was found regarding efficacy of compound alginate preparations(Gaviscon Infant(®) ) in infants, although as a result of these studies, Gaviscon Infant(®) was changed to become aluminium-free and has been assessed in its current form in only two studies since 1999. Given the diversity of study designs and the heterogeneity of outcomes, as well as the evolution in formulation, it was not possible to perform a meta-analysis on the efficacy of Gaviscon Infant(®) . Moderate evidence indicates that Gaviscon Infant(®) improves symptoms in infants, including those with functional reflux; the largest study of the current formulation showed improvement in symptom control but was limited by length of follow-up.No serious side effects were reported.No RCTs on pharmacological treatments for children with neurodisability were identified.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Moderate evidence was found to support the use of PPIs, along with some evidence to support the use of H₂ antagonists in older children with GORD, based on improvement in symptom scores, pH indices and endoscopic/histological appearances. However, lack of independent placebo-controlled and head-to-head trials makes conclusions as to relative efficacy difficult to determine. Further RCTs are recommended. No robust RCT evidence is available to support the use of domperidone, and further studies on prokinetics are recommended, including assessments of erythromycin.Pharmacological treatment of infants with reflux symptoms is problematic, as many infants have GOR, and little correlation has been noted between reported symptoms and endoscopic and pH findings. Better evidence has been found to support the use of PPIs in infants with GORD, but heterogeneity in outcomes and in study design impairs interpretation of placebo-controlled data regarding efficacy. Some evidence is available to support the use of Gaviscon Infant(®) , but further studies with longer follow-up times are recommended. Studies of omeprazole and lansoprazole in infants with functional GOR have demonstrated variable benefit, probably because of differences in inclusion criteria.No robust RCT evidence has been found regarding treatment of preterm babies with GOR/GORD or children with neurodisabilities. Initiation of RCTs with common endpoints is recommended, given the frequency of treatment and the use of multiple antireflux agents in these children.

A pilot trial on the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux-related cough in infants

BACKGROUND

Diagnosing asthma in infancy is largely made on the basis of the symptoms of cough and wheeze. A similar presentation can be seen in neurologically normal infants with excessive gastroesophageal reflux (GER). There are no randomized placebo controlled studies in infants using proton pump inhibitors (PPI) alone or in addition to prokinetic agents.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to confirm the presence of excessive GER in a population of infants that also had respiratory symptoms suggestive of asthma. Second, in a randomized placebo-controlled fashion, we determined whether treatment of GER with bethanacol and omeprazole could improve these respiratory symptoms.

METHODS

Infants (n=22) with a history of chronic cough and wheeze were enrolled, if they had evidence of GER by history and an abnormal pH probe or gastric emptying scan. Infants were randomly allocated to four treatment groups: placebo/placebo (PP), omeprazole plus bethanacol (OB), omeprazole/placebo (OP), bethanacol/placebo (BP). Evaluations by clinic questionnaire and exam, home diary, and pH probe data were done before, after study-medication and after open label of OB.

RESULTS

Nineteen children were studied. PP did not affect GER or respiratory symptoms, and did not decrease GER measured by pH probe. In contrast, OB decreased GER as measured by pH probe indices and parental assessment. In association, OB significantly decreased daytime coughing and improved respiratory scores. No adverse effects were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

In infants with a clinical presentation suggestive of chronic GER-related cough, the use of omeprazole and bethanacol appears to be viable therapeutic option.

Delayed-release oral suspension of omeprazole for the treatment of erosive esophagitis and gastroesophageal reflux disease in pediatric patients: a review

Omeprazole is a proton-pump inhibitor indicated for gastroesophageal reflux disease and erosive esophagitis treatment in children. The aim of this review was to evaluate the efficacy of delayed-release oral suspension of omeprazole in childhood esophagitis, in terms of symptom relief, reduction in reflux index and/or intragastric acidity, and endoscopic and/or histological healing. We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE (1990 to 2009) and identified 59 potentially relevant articles, but only 12 articles were suitable to be included in our analysis. All the studies evaluated symptom relief and reported a median relief rate of 80.4% (range 35%–100%). Five studies reported a significant reduction of the esophageal reflux index within normal limits (<7%) in all children, and 4 studies a significant reduction of intra-gastric acidity. The endoscopic healing rate, reported by 9 studies, was 84% after 8-week treatment and 95% after 12-week treatment, the latter being significantly higher than the histological healing rate (49%). In conclusion, omeprazole given at a dose ranging from 0.3 to 3.5 mg/kg once daily (median 1 mg/kg once daily) for at least 12 weeks is highly effective in childhood esophagitis.

Healthcare costs of GERD and acid-related conditions in pediatric patients, with comparison between histamine-2 receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease and acid-related conditions (GERD/ARC) are common in pediatric practice but their costs have not been well characterized.

AIM

To compare healthcare costs (HCC) and healthcare utilization (HCU) of pediatric GERD/ARC between groups of GERD/ARC patients initiated on histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H(2)RAs) or proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and matched controls.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Children (age < 18 years) diagnosed with GERD or ARC (exploratory category) were identified from a large US claims database (1999-2005) using ICD-9 codes. Costs of pediatric GERD/ARC were estimated by comparing 6-month post-diagnosis HCC between cases and matched controls. GERD/ARC-related HCC and HCU for the year 2005 were further compared between GERD/ARC patients initiated with PPIs vs. H(2)RAs in terms of the cost differences relative to pre-initiation (difference-in-difference) and using multivariate regression to adjust for demographics, pre-treatment health status and pre-treatment costs.

RESULTS

A total of 27 865 matched pairs were identified. GERD/ARC patients incurred on average more 6-month total HCC than controls ($2386). In 2005, 1010 pediatric patients were initiated on H(2)RAs or PPIs. About 61% were initiated on PPIs and incurred 1.8 times higher 6-month post-initiation GERD/ARC-related HCC than H(2)RA-initiated patients ($661 vs. $372, p < 0.001). Although total 6-month GERD/ARC-related HCC increased for both PPI- and H(2)RA-treated patients, the increase was 30% less for PPI-treated patients ($173 vs. $246, p = 0.521) in the difference-in-difference analysis and 69% less in the multivariate analysis ($109 vs. $347, p = 0.040).

LIMITATIONS

The use of an exploratory definition for GERD/ARC, administrative claims data and potential coding errors in diagnosis codes used in selection process may limit the generalizability of the results.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric GERD/ARC patients incurred significantly higher healthcare costs compared to similar children without GERD/ARC. Compared to patients initiated with H(2)RAs, patients initiated with PPIs had more baseline comorbidities, and lower GERD/ARC-related HCC after beginning treatment.

Current pharmacological management of gastro-esophageal reflux in children: an evidence-based systematic review

Gastro-esophageal reflux (GER) is a common phenomenon, characterized by the regurgitation of the gastric contents into the esophagus. Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the term applied when GER is associated with sequelae or faltering growth. The main aims of treatment are to alleviate symptoms, promote normal growth, and prevent complications. Medical treatments for children include (i) altering the viscosity of the feeds with alginates; (ii) altering the gastric pH with antacids, histamine H(2) receptor antagonists, and proton pump inhibitors; and (iii) altering the motility of the gut with prokinetics, such as metoclopramide and domperidone. Our aim was to systematically review the evidence base for the medical treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux in children. We searched PubMed, AdisOnline, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, and then manually searched reviews from the past 5 years using the key words 'gastro-esophageal' (or 'gastroesophageal'), 'reflux', 'esophagitis', and 'child$' (or 'infant') and 'drug$' or 'therapy'. Articles included were in English and had an abstract. We used the levels of evidence adopted by the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine in Oxford to assess the studies for all reported outcomes that were meaningful to clinicians making decisions about treatment. This included the impact of clinical symptoms, pH study profile, and esophageal appearance at endoscopy. Five hundred and eight articles were reviewed, of which 56 papers were original, relevant clinical trials. These were assessed further. Many of the studies considered had significant methodological flaws, although based on available evidence the following statements can be made. For infant GERD, ranitidine and omeprazole and probably lansoprazole are safe and effective medications, which promote symptomatic relief, and endoscopic and histological healing of esophagitis. Gaviscon(R) Infant sachets are safe and can improve symptoms of reflux. There is less evidence to support the use of domperidone or metoclopramide. More evidence is needed before other anti-reflux medications can be recommended. For older children, acid suppression is the mainstay of treatment. The largest evidence base supports the early use of H(2) receptor antagonists or proton pump inhibitors.

Pharmacodynamics and systemic exposure of esomeprazole in preterm infants and term neonates with gastroesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the pharmacodynamics and systemic exposure of esomeprazole in 26 preterm infants and term neonates with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux and pathologic acid exposure.

STUDY DESIGN

Enrolled patients received oral esomeprazole 0.5 mg/kg once daily for 7 days. Twenty-four-hour esophagogastric pH-impedance monitoring was performed at baseline and on day 7. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed on day 7. Symptoms occurring during the baseline and day 7 studies were recorded on a symptom chart.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences from baseline to day 7 of therapy in the frequency of bolus reflux, consistency of bolus reflux (liquid, mixed, or gas), extent of bolus reflux, or bolus clearance time. Acid bolus reflux episodes were reduced on therapy (median 30 vs 8, P < .001), as was the reflux index (mean % time esophageal pH < 4, 15.7% vs 7.1%, P < .001). The estimated geometric mean of area under the plasma concentration time curve during the dosing interval and observed maximum plasma concentration was 2.5 micromol x h/L and 0.74 micromol/L, respectively. The number of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms recorded over 24 hours was lower on therapy (median 22 vs 12, P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

In preterm infants and term neonates esomeprazole produces no change in bolus reflux characteristics despite significant acid suppression.

Dyspepsia in childhood and adolescence: insights and treatment considerations

Functional dyspepsia (FD) is common in children, with as many as 80% of those being evaluated for chronic abdominal pain reporting symptoms of epigastric discomfort, nausea, or fullness. It is known that patients with persistent complaints have increased comorbidities such as depression and anxiety. The interaction with psychopathologic variables has been found to mediate the association between upper abdominal pain and gastric hypersensitivity. These observations suggest that abnormal central nervous system processing of gastric stimuli may be a relevant pathophysiologic mechanism in FD. Despite increased understanding, no specific therapy has emerged; however, recent nonpharmacological-based options such as hypnosis may be effective. Novel approaches, including dietary manipulation and use of nutraceuticals such as ginger and Iberogast (Medical Futures Inc., Ontario, Canada), may also be considered.

Pharmacokinetics and acid-suppressive effects of esomeprazole in infants 1-24 months old with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the pharmacokinetics and acid-suppressive effects of esomeprazole in infants with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this single-blind, randomized, parallel-group study, 50 infants 1 to 24 months old with symptoms of GERD, and >or=5% of time with intraesophageal pH <4 during 24-hour dual pH monitoring, received oral esomeprazole 0.25 mg/kg (n = 26) or 1 mg/kg (n = 24) once daily for 1 week. Intraesophageal and intragastric pH were recorded at 1 week, and blood samples were taken for pharmacokinetic analysis.

RESULTS

At baseline, mean percentages of time with intragastric pH >4 and intraesophageal pH <4 were 30.5% and 11.6%, respectively, in the esomeprazole 0.25 mg/kg group and 28.6% and 12.5% in the esomeprazole 1 mg/kg group. After 1 week of treatment, times with intragastric pH >4 were 47.9% and 69.3% in the esomeprazole 0.25 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg groups, respectively (P < 0.001 vs baseline), and times with intraesophageal pH <4 were 8.4% (P < 0.05 vs baseline) and 5.5% (P < 0.001 vs. baseline), respectively. The mean number of acid reflux episodes of >5 minutes duration decreased from 6 at baseline to 3 and 2 with esomeprazole 0.25 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg, respectively. The geometric mean AUC0-t of esomeprazole were 0.24 and 1.79 micromol x h/L for the 0.25 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg dosages of esomeprazole, respectively. Both esomeprazole dosages were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral treatment with esomeprazole 0.25 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg was well tolerated and provided dose-related acid suppression, dose-related exposure to esomeprazole, and decreased esophageal acid exposure in infants 1-24 months old with GERD.

Maintenance therapy for erosive esophagitis in children after healing by omeprazole: is it advisable?

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of acid-suppressive maintenance therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in children, after the healing of reflux esophagitis.

METHODS

Forty-eight children (median age 105 months, range 32-170) with erosive reflux esophagitis were initially treated with omeprazole 1.4 mg/kg/day for 3 months. Patients in endoscopic remission were assigned in a randomized, blinded manner by means of a computer-generated list to three groups of 6-month maintenance treatment: group A (omeprazole at half the starting dose, once daily before breakfast), group B (ranitidine 10 mg/kg/day, divided in two doses), and group C (no treatment). Endoscopic, histological, and symptomatic scores were evaluated at: T0, enrollment; T1, assessment for remission at 3 months after enrollment (healing phase); T2, assessment for effective maintenance at 12 months after T0 (3 months after the completion of the maintenance phase). Relapse was defined as the recurrence of macroscopic esophageal lesions. After the completion of the maintenance phase, patients without macroscopic esophagitis relapse were followed up for GERD symptoms for a further period of 30 months.

RESULTS

Of 48 initially treated patients, 46 (94%) healed and entered the maintenance study. For all patients, in comparison to T0, the histological, endoscopic, and symptomatic scores were significantly reduced both at T1 and T2 (P<0.0001, for each). No significant difference was found in these three scores, comparing group A, B, and C at T1 and T2. A relapse occurred in one patient only, who presented with macroscopic esophageal lesions at T2. Three months after the completion of the maintenance phase, 12 (26%) patients complained of symptoms sufficiently mild to discontinue GERD therapy, excluding the patient who showed macroscopic esophagitis relapse. Three of 44 (6.8%) patients reported very mild GERD symptoms within a period of 30 months after maintenance discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our pediatric population showed a low rate of erosive esophagitis relapse and GERD symptom recurrence long term after healing with omeprazole, irrespective of the maintenance therapy.

Effect of omeprazole on acid gastroesophageal reflux and gastric acidity in preterm infants with pathological acid reflux

INTRODUCTION

Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy is increasingly being used to treat premature infants with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); however, the efficacy of PPI on acid production in this population has yet to be assessed in this patient group. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of 0.7 mg/kg/d omeprazole on gastric acidity and acid gastroesophageal reflux in preterm infants with reflux symptoms and pathological acid reflux on 24-h pH probe.

METHODS

A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design trial of omeprazole therapy was performed in 10 preterm infants (34-40 weeks postmenstrual age). Infants were given omeprazole for 7 d and then placebo for 7 d in randomized order. Twenty-four-hour esophageal and gastric pH monitoring was performed on days 7 and 14 of the trial.

RESULTS

Compared to placebo, omeprazole therapy significantly reduced gastric acidity (%time pH <4, 54% vs 14%, P < 0.0005), esophageal acid exposure (%time pH <4, 19% vs 5%, P < 0.01) and number of acid GER episodes (119 vs 60 episodes, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Omeprazole is effective in reducing esophageal acid exposure in premature infants with pathological acid reflux on 24-h pH probe; however, the far more complex issues of safety and efficacy have yet to be addressed.

Pharmacokinetics of proton pump inhibitors in children

The use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) has become widespread in children and infants for the management of paediatric acid-related disease. Pharmacokinetic profiles of only omeprazole and lansoprazole have been well characterised in children over 2 years of age with acid-related diseases. Few data have been recently published regarding the pharmacokinetics of pantoprazole in children, and none are available for rabeprazole or esomeprazole. The metabolism of PPI enantiomers has never been studied in the paediatric population. A one-compartment model best describes the pharmacokinetic behaviour of omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole in children, with important interindividual variability for each pharmacokinetic parameter. Like adults, PPIs are rapidly absorbed in children following oral administration; the mean time to reach maximum plasma concentration varies from 1 to 3 hours. Since these agents are acid labile, their oral formulations consist of capsules containing enteric-coated granules. No liquid formulation is available for any of the PPIs. Thus, for those patients unable to swallow capsules, extemporaneous liquid preparations for omeprazole and lansoprazole have been reported; however, neither the absolute nor the relative bioavailabilities of these oral formulations have been studied in children. Intravenous formulations are available for omeprazole (in Europe), lansoprazole and pantoprazole. PPIs are rapidly metabolised in children, with short elimination half-lives of around 1 hour, similar to that reported for adults. All PPIs are extensively metabolised by the liver, primarily by cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoforms CYP2C19 and CYP3A4, to inactive metabolites, with little unchanged drug excreted in the urine. Similar to that seen in adults, the absolute bioavailability of omeprazole increases with repeated dosing in children; this phenomenon is thought to be due to a combination of decreased first-pass elimination and reduced systemic clearance. The apparent clearance (CL/F) of omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole appears to be faster for children than for adults. A higher metabolic capacity in children as well as differences in the extent of PPI bioavailability are most likely responsible for this finding. This may partly account for the need in children for variable and sometimes considerably greater doses of PPIs, on a per kilogram basis, than for adults to achieve similar plasma concentrations. Furthermore, no studies have been able to demonstrate a statistically significant correlation between age and pharmacokinetic parameters among children. Despite the small number of very young infants studied, there is some evidence for reduced PPI metabolism in newborns. The limited paediatric data regarding the impact of CYP2C19 genetic polymorphism on PPI metabolism are similar to those reported for adults, with poor metabolisers having 6- to 10-fold higher area under the concentration-time curve values compared with extensive metabolisers. Finally, because a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship exists for PPIs, the significant interindividual variability in their disposition may partly explain the wide range of therapeutic doses used in children. Further studies are needed to better define the pharmacokinetics of PPIs in children <2 years of age.

Management of unresponsive asthma

Difficult asthma is defined as asthma that is not controlled despite treatment with> 800 micro g budesonide or equivalent per day. Poor control is defined as the need for bronchodilators more than three times a week, school absence of more than five days a term, or one episode or more of wheezing each month. Common causes of poor response to treatment include; wrong diagnosis, inappropriate medications or improper inhalation technique, poor adherence to medications and co-morbidity. Steroid resistant asthma is uncommon and estimated to be 1 in 1000-10000 asthmatic patients. If there is no functional improvement to prednisolone 2 mg/kg/day for 2 weeks with adherence checked by measuring serum prednisolone and cortisol levels, a fibreoptic bronchoscopic examination with bronchoalveolar lavage and large airway biopsy should be considered. Eosinophilic inflammation identified on the biopsy in a child who is unresponsive to prednisolone may benefit from alternative anti-inflammatory treatments such as cyclosporin. Neutrophilic infiltration in biopsy may benefit with macrolide antibiotics, 5-lipogenase inhibitors or theophyllines.

Effect of Helicobacter pylori infection on gastric acid secretion and meal-stimulated serum gastrin in children

BACKGROUND

Comparative studies of gastric acid secretion in children related to Helicobacter pylori infection are lacking. The purpose of this study was to compare acid secretion and meal-stimulated gastrin in relation to H. pylori infection among pediatric patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-six children aged 10-17 years (17 with H. pylori infection) undergoing diagnostic endoscopy participated in the study. Diagnoses included gastritis only (n = 23), duodenal ulcer (n = 5) and normal histology (n = 8). Gastric acid output was studied using the endoscopic gastric secretion test before and 2-3 months after H. pylori eradication. Meal-stimulated serum gastrin response was assessed before and 12 months after eradication.

RESULTS

H. pylori gastritis was typically antrum-predominant. Acid secretion was greater in H. pylori-positive patients with duodenal ulcer than in gastritis-only patients or controls [mean +/- standard error (SE): 6.56 +/- 1.4, 3.11 +/- 0.4 and 2.65 +/- 0.2 mEq/10 minutes, respectively; p <.001]. Stimulated acid secretion was higher in H. pylori-positive boys than girls (5.0 +/- 0.8 vs. 2.51 +/- 0.4 mEq/10 minutes, respectively; p <.05). Stimulated acid secretion pre- and post-H. pylori eradication was similar (5.47 +/- 0.8 vs. 4.67 +/- 0.9 mEq/10 minutes, respectively; p =.21). Increased basal and meal-stimulated gastrin release reversed following H. pylori eradication (e.g. basal from 134 to 46 pg/ml, p <.001 and peak from 544 to 133 pg/ml, p <.05).

CONCLUSIONS

H. pylori infection in children is associated with a marked but reversible increase in meal-stimulated serum gastrin release. Gastric acid hypersecretion in duodenal ulcer remains after H. pylori eradication, suggesting that the host factor plays a critical role in outcome of the infection.

Proton pump inhibitors in pediatrics: relevant pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics

A marked discordance between the disposition of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in plasma and the kinetics of effect suggests the need for new approaches to characterize the clinical pharmacology of PPIs in infants and children. An assessment of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics must take into account the genetic polymorphism of CYP2C19 and the impact of ontogeny on the activity of this and other enzymes (e.g., CYP3A4) which affect the biotransformation of the PPIs and, thus, their plasma clearance. In addition, the potential effects of extemporaneous formulations of the drugs on their rate and extent of absorption must be considered. Because of the apparent safety of PPIs and a well-demonstrated dose-response-effect relationship in adults, pediatric pharmacokinetic data and an exposure correlate, such as the dose-area-under-the-plasma-concentration-versus-time-curve relationship, can be used as a bridge to determine pediatric dosing.

The use of proton pump inhibitors in children: a comprehensive review

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) belong to a group of chemically related compounds whose primary function is the inhibition of acid production in the final common metabolic pathway of gastric parietal cells. PPIs are highly selective and effective in their action and have few short- or long-term adverse effects. These pharmacologic features have made the development of PPIs the most significant advancement in the management of acid peptic related disorders in the last two decades. There are numerous published adult studies that describe the pharmacology, efficacy and safety of these anti-secretory agents; however, in the pediatric population, there are very few comparable studies, particularly multicenter studies with significant patient enrollment. In preparing this article, our aim was to perform a comprehensive review of the literature on the clinical pharmacology and use of PPIs in the pediatric population, and to briefly review some recent articles. Relevant literature was identified by performing MEDLINE/Pubmed searches from January 1990 to December 2001. Combinations of the following search terms were use to analyze these databases: proton pump inhibitor, children, pediatrics, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), esophagitis, intestinal metaplasia, Helicobacter pylori, omeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, rabeprazole, esomeprazole, and safety. Abstracts from the 14th annual conference of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) 2001, and the Disease and Digestive Week 2001, were also included in the review. All pediatric studies reviewed were limited to either omeprazole or lansoprazole. The dosage range used for the management of GERD and related disorders with lansoprazole was 0.73-1.66 mg/kg/day (maximum 30 mg/day). The dosage range for GERD management using omeprazole was 0.3-3.5 mg/kg (maximum 80 mg/day). The dosage range for omeprazole used for H. pylori was 0.5-1.5 mg/kg/day, with a maximum dosage of 40 mg/day, and lansoprazole-containing regimens for H. pylori eradication used dosages ranging from 0.6-1.2 mg/kg/day, with a maximum dosage of 30 mg/day. Few severe adverse events were reported with the use of either drug. Eradication rates for H. pylori were 56-87% for lansoprazole-based triple therapy, and 75-94% for omeprazole-based eradication regimens. To date, there are no published controlled trials of sufficient power comparing the efficacy of the five commercially available PPIs in children, for a variety of acid peptic diseases. Studies suggest that PPIs are highly effective for the management of GERD and related disorders, and are a critically needed component of triple therapy to eradicate H. pylori. PPIs have a very good tolerability profile in adults and children, but long-term tolerability studies are needed, particularly in the pediatric population. Multicenter studies are critically needed to evaluate the second-generation PPIs, to compare PPI efficacy to each other, and to assess the importance of developmental and genetic pharmacology of these drugs in children with acid-peptic disease.

Gastroesophageal reflux in children: pathogenesis, prevalence, diagnosis, and role of proton pump inhibitors in treatment

A substantial percentage of infants, children and adolescents experience gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and its accompanying symptoms, as well as disease complications. The diagnosis of GERD in children is made based upon the child's history, and data derived primarily from pH monitoring tests and endoscopy. In those children with confirmed reflux disease, the options for management parallel those recommended in adult patients, with the first step consisting of lifestyle changes. Surgical procedures may also be performed; however, these are rarely recommended prior to an adequate course of pharmacologic therapy, and appropriate case selection is important. Among the current pharmacotherapeutic options available in the US, the prokinetic agents and the acid-inhibitory agents (histamine-2 receptor antagonists, proton pump inhibitors) are the most widely used. The clinical utility of the prokinetic agents has been limited by the recent withdrawal of cisapride from the US marketplace and the potential for irreversible central nervous system complications with metoclopramide. Numerous clinical studies performed in adults, and several studies involving children, have demonstrated that the proton pump inhibitors are more effective than the histamine-2 receptor antagonists in the relief of GERD symptoms and healing of erosive esophagitis. In children, omeprazole and lansoprazole may be administered as the intact oral capsule, or in those who are unable or unwilling to swallow, the granule contents of the capsule may be mixed with soft foods (e.g. apple sauce) or fruit drinks/liquid dietary supplements prior to oral administration with no detrimental effects on pharmacokinetics, bioavailability, or pharmacodynamics. Studies performed with omeprazole and lansoprazole in children have shown pharmacokinetic parameters that closely resemble those observed in adults. In over a decade of use in adults, the proton pump inhibitor class of agents has been found to have a good safety profile. Studies involving children have also shown these agents to be well tolerated. In numerous drug-drug interaction studies performed with these two proton pump inhibitors, relatively few clinically significant interactions have been observed.

Gastroesophageal reflux and cow milk allergy: is there a link?

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and cow milk allergy (CMA) occur frequently in infants younger than 1 year. In recent years, the relation between these 2 entities has been investigated and some important conclusions have been reached: in up to half of the cases of GER in infants younger than 1 year, there may be an association with CMA. In a high proportion of cases, GER is not only CMA associated but also CMA induced. The frequency of this association should induce pediatricians to screen for possible concomitant CMA in all infants who have GER and are younger than 1 year. With the exception of some patients with mild typical CMA manifestations (diarrhea, dermatitis, or rhinitis), the symptoms of GER associated with CMA are the same as those observed in primary GER. Immunologic tests and esophageal pH monitoring (with a typical pH pattern characterized by a progressive, slow decrease in esophageal pH between feedings) may be helpful if an association between GER and CMA is suspected, although the clinical response to an elimination diet and challenge is the only clue to the diagnosis. This article reviews the main features of GER and CMA, focusing on the aspects in common and the discrepancies between both conditions.

Pharmacology for the gastrointestinal tract

A variety of drugs are used in the neonatal nursery for the management of feeding intolerance, gastroesophageal reflux, and acid-related disease. Although the pharmacokinetics of some of these drugs have been described in infants and older children, further data are needed, particularly for preterm infants. No data are available characterizing the disposition of the proton pump inhibitors, which will likely be used in infants with refractory, acid-related disease. Further data are also needed to characterize fully the pharmacodynamics, or efficacy, of many of the commonly used drugs.

Omeprozole therapy in pediatric patients after liver and intestinal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitors such as omeprazole are increasingly used to prevent stress-related gastric bleeding in critically ill patients. In this investigation, the acid-suppressive potency of omeprazole was assessed in one at-risk group, pediatric patients undergoing liver or intestinal transplantation, or both.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients ranging in age from 0.9 to 108 months (23.8 +/- 6.5) underwent isolated liver (n = 10) or intestinal (11 with composite liver allografts) transplantation. Omeprazole was delivered in bicarbonate suspension through a nasogastric tube. Therapy was started after surgery at 0.5 mg/kg every 12 hours. Gastric pH monitoring was performed approximately 2 days later.

RESULTS

For the entire group, mean gastric pH equaled 6.1 +/- 0.3, the same in recipients of isolated liver and intestinal allografts. Twelve of the 22 patients demonstrated a discontinuous omeprazole effect, that is, dissipation of acid reduction before the next dose. Five of the 12 patients with discontinuous omeprazole effect had mean gastric pH of less than 5 (3.9 +/- 0.4). In 4 of these 5, the omeprazole dosing interval was shortened to every 8 or every 6 hours, resulting in an increase in mean pH to 6.6 +/- 0.2 ( P < 0.01). In the remaining 10 of 22 patients, acid suppression was uninterrupted until the next dose. No patient experienced bleeding attributable to gastric erosion.

CONCLUSION

Omeprazole suspended in sodium bicarbonate is an effective acid-suppressing agent in pediatric recipients of liver or intestinal transplant, or both. A dosage of 0.5 mg/kg every 12 hours is sufficient for most patients, but dosing every 6 to 8 hours is required to assure maximal acid suppression in all.

Guidelines for evaluation and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux in infants and children: recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER), defined as passage of gastric contents into the esophagus, and GER disease (GERD), defined as symptoms or complications of GER, are common pediatric problems encountered by both primary and specialty medical providers. Clinical manifestations of GERD in children include vomiting, poor weight gain, dysphagia, abdominal or substernal pain, esophagitis and respiratory disorders. The GER Guideline Committee of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition has formulated a clinical practice guideline for the management of pediatric GER. The GER Guideline Committee, consisting of a primary care pediatrician, two clinical epidemiologists (who also practice primary care pediatrics) and five pediatric gastroenterologists, based its recommendations on an integration of a comprehensive and systematic review of the medical literature combined with expert opinion. Consensus was achieved through Nominal Group Technique, a structured quantitative method. The Committee examined the value of diagnostic tests and treatment modalities commonly used for the management of GERD, and how those interventions can be applied to clinical situations in the infant and older child. The guideline provides recommendations for management by the primary care provider, including evaluation, initial treatment, follow-up management and indications for consultation by a specialist. The guideline also provides recommendations for management by the pediatric gastroenterologist. This document represents the official recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition on the evaluation and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux in infants and children. The American Academy of Pediatrics has also endorsed these recommendations. The recommendations are summarized in a synopsis within the article. This review and recommendations are a general guideline and are not intended as a substitute for clinical judgment or as a protocol for the management of all patients with this problem.

Intravenous omeprazole in children: pharmacokinetics and effect on 24-hour intragastric pH

BACKGROUND

Omeprazole is a proton pump inhibitor, acting selectively on the gastric parietal cell H+K+-adenosine triphosphatase. Data on the intravenous route are limited in children and not available in infants.

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to determine the pharmacokinetics and the optimal dosage of intravenous omeprazole in patients younger than 30 months of age.

METHODS

Nine children (three girls), aged 4.5 to 27 months, with normal liver and renal functions requiring intravenous omeprazole were studied. After enrollment in the study and randomization, omeprazole was administered once daily, at 8 am, as a 1-hour infusion. Group 1, consisting of the first four patients, received 20 mg/1.73 m2, and group 2, consisting of the following five patients, received 40 mg/1.73 m2. At day 3, a 24-hour intragastric pH and a pharmacokinetic study of omeprazole were performed. Plasma concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography.

RESULTS

Patients in group 2 had a significantly higher median pH (6.99 vs. 3.35; P = 0.01) and percent of monitored time with gastric pH >4 than children given 20 mg/1.73 m2 (90.6% vs. 44.8%; P < 0.01). Four had a pH more than 4 during more than 90% of the time versus none of the patients of group 1. The plasma concentration versus time curves showed rapid elimination of the drug. The median area under the curve of omeprazole was 0.78 microg. mL-1. h-1 (range, 0.55-1.64 microg. mL-1. h-1) and 3.95 microg. mL-1. h-1 (range, 1.9-4.9 microg. mL-1. h-1), respectively, in groups 1 and 2 (P < 0.05). Systemic clearance was not different between the two groups: median values were 0.68 and 0.42 L. kg-1. h-1 (P = 0.22).

CONCLUSIONS

In critical situations, intravenous administration of omeprazole may be required in infants. The authors demonstrate that the dose of 20 mg/1.73 m2 is not effective in maintaining 24-hour gastric pH of more than 4 and that a dose of 40 mg/1.73 m2 is required.

Omeprazole pharmacodynamics and gastric acid suppression in critically ill pediatric transplant patients

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of omeprazole suspension in critically ill pediatric liver/intestinal transplant patients. DESIGN: Open-label pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic study. SETTING: Pediatric intensive care unit of an academic medical center. PATIENTS: Eleven pediatric liver and/or intestinal transplant patients. INTERVENTIONS: Extemporaneously prepared 0.5 mg/kg omeprazole suspension every 12 hrs via nasogastric tube before sequential measurements of omeprazole serum concentration and gastric pH monitoring. Gastric pH was monitored continuously for 48 hrs and plasma omeprazole concentrations were determined upon first and multiple dosing. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mean onset of action of omeprazole in a sodium bicarbonate vehicle was 62 +/- 82 mins (range, 2-226 mins). Subjects <4 yrs of age exhibited a more variable onset of omeprazole action (range, 3-226 mins) when compared with older subjects (onset of action, 2-40 min). Omeprazole maximum concentration and area under the concentration-time curve for the dosage interval were significantly greater upon multiple dosing when compared with the first dose. Mean baseline gastric pH in this study population was 1.0 +/- 0.8. Gastric pH remained >4.0 for 78.8% +/- 18.9% of the first dosage interval and 97.8% +/- 5.4% of multiple dosage intervals regardless of age when administered twice daily as a suspension. CONCLUSION: These results support the use of omeprazole administered twice daily as a suspension to maintain gastric pH of >4.0 and to achieve maximal pharmacodynamic effect in pediatric liver and/or intestinal transplant patients.

Pharmacokinetics of orally administered omeprazole in children. International Pediatric Omeprazole Pharmacokinetic Group

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to examine the pharmacokinetics of orally administered omeprazole in children.

METHODS

Plasma concentrations of omeprazole were measured at steady state over a 6-h period after administration of the drug. Patients were a subset of those in a multicenter study to determine the dose, safety, efficacy, and tolerability of omeprazole in the treatment of erosive reflux esophagitis in children. Children were 1-16 yr of age, with erosive esophagitis and pathological acid reflux on 24 h-intraesophageal pH study. The "healing dose" of omeprazole was that at which subsequent intraesophageal pH study normalized. Children remained on this dose for 3 months, and during this period the pharmacokinetics were measured.

RESULTS

A total of 57 children were enrolled in the overall healing phase of the study. Pharmacokinetic study was optional for subjects and was performed in 25 of the 57 enrolled. The doses of omeprazole required were substantially higher doses per kilogram of body weight than in adults. Values of the pharmacokinetic parameters of omeprazole were generally within the ranges previously reported in adults. However, the plasma levels, area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC), plasma half-life (t(1/2)), and maximal plasma concentration (Cmax), were lower in the younger age group, when the AUC and Cmax were normalized to a dose of 1 mg/kg. Furthermore, within the group as a whole, these values showed a gradation from lowest in the children 1-6 yr of age to higher in the older age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The pharmacokinetics of omeprazole in children showed a trend toward higher metabolic capacity with decreasing age, being highest at 1-6 yr of age. This may explain the need for higher doses of omeprazole on a per kilogram basis, not only in children overall compared with adults but, in many cases, particularly in younger children.

Lansoprazole in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in childhood

BACKGROUND

Acid suppressive therapy is the mainstay of pharmacologic treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Use of proton pump inhibitors in children is still limited and has only included omeprazole in a few controlled studies.

AIM

To determine efficacy of lansoprazole, a relatively new proton pump inhibitor, on symptoms and oesophagitis in a group of children with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease refractory to H2 receptor antagonists. The required dose of the drug for inhibiting gastric acidity was also determined.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A series of 35 children (median age: 7.6 years, range: 3-15) with oesophagitis refractory to H2 receptor antagonists received a 12-week therapeutic course with lansoprazole. Prior to the study children underwent symptomatic and endoscopic assessment, oesophageal manometry and 24-hour intragastric and intra-oesophageal pH test. The latter was repeated after one week of therapy while patients were on treatment in order to monitor the degree of acid suppression and adjust the dose of the drug. Symptomatic assessment and endoscopy were repeated at the end of the trial

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

In 12 patients (group A), the initial dose of the drug was efficacious (1.3 to 1.5 mg/kg/day), whereas in 23 [group B) the initial dose (0.8 to 1.0 mg/kg/day) was increased by half because of insufficient inhibition of intragastric acidity (i.e., when the intra-gastric pH remained below 4.0 for more than 50% of the recording time). Nine patients in group A (75%) and 8 in group B (53.5%) healed (chi2: 3.6, p<0.05); 1 patient in group A [8.3%) and 7 in group B (30.5%) remained unchanged (chi2: 6.9, p<0.01); 2 patients in group A and 8 in group B improved and underwent a further month of therapy. The two groups did not differ as far as concerns baseline pH, endoscopic and clinical variables. In both groups, those patients failing to respond at the end of the trial showed a more impaired oesophageal motility than improved or healed patients. The drug was well tolerated and no significant laboratory abnormalities occurred. In children with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease refractory to H2 receptor antagonists, a 12-week course of lansoprazole is effective both in healing oesophagitis and improving symptoms. An initial dose of 1.5 mg/kg/day of the drug is suggested. However, if during treatment, patients remain symptomatic the dose should be increased and a prolonged intra-gastric and intra-oesophageal pH test performed to evaluate the acid suppression efficacy of the adjusted dose. A short course of lansoprazole appears to be safe and well tolerated in paediatric age.

Management of supraesophageal complications of gastroesophageal reflux disease in infants and children

Therapy of supraesophageal manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in infants and children nearly always includes "lifestyle modifications" (conservative or nonpharmacologic therapy). Depending on the severity of the GERD manifestation, pharmacotherapy is often added. Although data to support the practice are not abundant, it is rational to begin with prokinetic pharmacotherapy and to add acid suppression if pathologic effects of acid contact with the esophagus or airway are suspected. Pathologic effects of acid produce most forms of supraesophageal GERD; the exception is infantile regurgitation, the most common example of supraesophageal GERD, which is often unaccompanied by either esophagitis or evidence of acid entry into the airway. Currently, fundoplication is rarely required for pediatric GERD, but the supraesophageal complications of GERD are more common indications for this surgery than the esophageal complications in children. Other management options for supraesophageal symptoms in children include delivery of nutrients by tube feeding slowly and continuously into the stomach or, better, small intestine. Short-term or trial tube feeding uses a transnasal tube, for example, for nasojejunal feeding; longer-term tube feeding is simplified by a gastrostomy, which can be placed relatively noninvasively using endoscopy or fluoroscopy.

[Proton pump inhibitors in pediatrics]

For the past ten years or so, proton pump inhibitors (PPI) such as omeprazole, lansoprazole, or pantoprazole, have become the reference treatment for peptic disorders in adults. PPIs have recently begun to be used in pediatrics, and this use is likely to expand. They act on the final step of gastric acid secretion by completely inhibiting the ATPase (proton pump) at the surface of the gastric parietal cells, thus yielding long term inhibition which is not correlated with the plasma concentration of the drug, in contrast to the effects of H2-blocker drugs. Our knowledge of this new class of treatment in pediatrics is still fragmentary, but the reported pharmacokinetic and clinical data indicate that they are suitable for use in children. While the short-term risk of complications appears to be minimal, the tolerance of these drugs in chronic use requires careful monitoring because of the potential consequences of prolonged inhibition of acid secretion.

Upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding in critically ill pediatric patients

Similar to adults, children under physiologic stress can develop an imbalance in defensive (mucosal layer, motility) and aggressive (gastric acid, bile salts, enzymes) factors responsible for maintaining a healthy gastrointestinal tract. Hypoxia in the gastrointestinal tract likely disrupts the defensive factors, thereby permitting damage by aggressive factors to upper gastrointestinal epithelium that may progress to stress ulceration and acute upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding (UGIB). The basic pathophysiology may be similar in children and adults; however, differences in the time to developing ulceration, ulcer location, and number of ulcers have been reported. Functional development of the gastrointestinal tract is influenced by disease, gestational and postnatal age, and exposure to and type of enteral feedings, thereby confounding the development and prophylaxis of UGIB in neonates and infants. In addition, pharmacotherapy decisions are often complicated by drug administration issues and adverse effects.

Omeprazole in infants with cimetidine-resistant peptic esophagitis

Twelve neurologically normal infants (age 2.9+/-0.9 months) with peptic esophagitis (grade 2) who did not respond to cimetidine (in addition to positioning, cisapride, and Gaviscon) were treated with omeprazole, 0.5 mg/kg once a day, for 6 weeks. The effectiveness of omeprazole was evaluated in all infants by clinical assessment and endoscopy before and after treatment and by 24-hour gastric pH monitoring during treatment in seven infants. Omeprazole therapy led to a marked decrease in symptoms, endoscopic and histologic signs of esophagitis, and intragastric acidity.

Omeprazole-based dual and triple regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication in children

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of omeprazole-based dual and triple regimens for the treatment of children with Helicobacter pylori infection.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients (3 with gastric ulcer, 12 with duodenal ulcer, and 7 with nodular gastritis alone) were studied. Twelve ulcer patients also had nodular gastritis. The dual regimen included a 2-week course of omeprazole (0.6 mg/kg twice a day) and amoxicillin (30 mg/kg twice a day) (n = 10), and the triple regimen included the dual regimen plus clarithromycin (15 mg/kg twice a day) (n = 12). In patients with active ulcers, omeprazole once daily was administered for another 4 weeks. Endoscopic biopsies were taken before therapy and 4 weeks after completion of a 2-week course of therapy, and patients were followed for 6 months. The gastritis score (grade 0 to 3) and serum anti-H pylori IgG antibody titers were also determined.

RESULTS

The regimens were tolerated by all patients. Eradication rates for the dual and triple regimens were 70% and 92%, respectively. Active ulcers completely healed within 6 weeks. Patients with nodular gastritis alone showed different clinical responses to therapy. Pretreatment histology showed chronic gastritis in all patients. Successful H pylori eradication significantly reduced the mean gastritis score from 2.9 to 1.3, but unsuccessful eradication did not reduce it. The disappearance of antral nodularity often coincided with the success of eradication. Successful eradication significantly decreased pretreatment serum anti-H pylori IgG antibody titers by 29% at 1 month, by 52% at 3 months, and by 67% at 6 months. Side effects were mild and were reported in 23% of patients.

CONCLUSION

An omeprazole-based regimen is safe and may be a better option for eradication of H pylori in children. Antral nodularity is a macroscopic marker of H pylori infection.