Clinical performance of resin-retained fixed partial dentures bonded with a chemically active luting cement

Longevity of resin-bonded fixed partial dentures made of metal alloys: A review of the literature

Purpose In this review, we evaluate the survival rate of resin-bonded fixed partial dentures (RBFPDs) made of metal alloys.Methods An electronic search of English peer-reviewed dental literature on PubMed was conducted to identify all publications reporting on RBFPDs made of metal alloys until March 2019. The searched keywords were: bridge OR fixed partial denture OR fixed prosthesis OR fixed prostheses AND resin bonded AND metal OR alloy AND survival OR longevity (RBFPD was not included). Furthermore, the "Related Articles" feature of PubMed was used to identify further references of interest during the primary search. A definitive list of articles was screened to extract qualitative data after the application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the results were analyzed.Results Overall, 977 publications were found through an electronic and manual search, out of which 130 articles were selected after screening based on title and abstract. A total of 52 publications passed the second review phase after assessment for eligibility, from which 24 studies were excluded after full-text screening. Finally, a total of 28 studies were selected.Conclusions The survival rate of RBFPDs differed greatly depending on the type of metal alloy, adhesion system, and observation period assessed, e.g. the 10-year survival rate ranged from 18% to 88%. The wide range of survival rates of the RBFPDs reported indicates that though RBFPD is a reliable prosthesis, it is prone to failure if some processes are not completed.

A randomised controlled trial of two-unit cantilevered or three-unit fixed-movable resin-bonded fixed partial dentures replacing missing molars

OBJECTIVE

To examine the short-term clinical performance and patient-reported outcomes of two-unit cantilevered (CL2) and three-unit fixed-movable (FM3) RBFPDs for replacement of single molar-sized spans.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjects with an 8-10 mm molar-sized edentulous span(s) and 12 pairs of occluding units were randomly assigned to receive either CL2 or FM3 RBFPD (ratio 1:1). The survival (retention of original prosthesis) and success (survival, complication-free) of RBFPDs at one-year were analysed. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed by prosthesis satisfactory questionnaire and Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-49). Data in mean, proportion and longevity were analysed by t-test/Mann-Whitney U test/Wilcoxon signed-rank test, chi-square and log-rank tests respectively at significance level α = 0.05.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02239718.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight RBFPDs (42 CL2 and 56 FM3) were delivered in eighty-three patients. Majority (n = 89) of the prostheses were provided by operators who have less than 2 years of clinical experience. Sixty-six patients with seventy-eight RBFPDs (35 CL2 and 43 FM3) were reviewed at one-year. One CL2 and one FM3 RBFPDs debonded, resulting in a success rate at 97.1 % and 97.7 % respectively (P > 0.05). Both RBFPDs were rebonded and the survival rate were 100 % for both designs. No significant difference in satisfactions and summary OHIP-49 scores were observed (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

CL2 RBFPDs can be used for replacing molar-sized edentulous spans with minimal observable complications up to one-year. Longer-term data is being collected.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

This clinical trial demonstrates CL2 RBFPDs have comparable clinical and patient-reported outcomes as the FM3 design. This challenges the current dogma in prosthodontics and expands the clinical use of CL2 design which is more conservative, simpler and easier for patients to maintain.

Layer structure and load-bearing properties of fibre reinforced composite beam used in cantilever fixed dental prostheses

This study evaluates the effect of fiber reinforcement quantity and position on fracture load of fixed dental prostheses specimens with different fibre reinforced composite (FRC)/ particulate filler composite (PFC) ratio in a cantilever beam test. Three types of specimen structures where made: Specimens with FRC, PFC, or with a combination of both. Specimen's size was 2.0×2.0×25 mm³ and the thicknesses of the FRC layers were 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mm. The layers of FRC were placed at the top or at the bottom. Eight groups of specimens were evaluated (n=15/group). The test specimens were statically-loaded until fracture. The fracture loads were linearly dependent on the quantity of the FRC reinforcement when placed at the top (R²=0.941) and bottom (R²=0.896) of the specimens. ANOVA revealed that reinforcement position on the tension side and higher FRC reinforcement volume in the test specimens had positive effect to load bearing capacity (p<0.001).

Resin bonded bridges in patients with hypodontia: Clinical performance over a 7 year observation period

PURPOSE

Resin bonded bridges (RBBs) are considered a conservative option in the management of hypodontia. This study targeted to analyze the survival of resin bonded bridges provided to patients with Hypodontia by staff and students at the Department of Restorative Dentistry, University Dental School and Hospital Cork, Ireland. It was also to determine the factors that may influence the survival of RBBs in patients with hypodontia.

METHODS

Forty patients with hypodontia who received 65 RBBs from 2001 to 2007 were identified and contacted to be recruited for this study. Of these, nine were not contactable, and five failed to attend. Accordingly, 26 patients (65%) participated in the study, with a total of 51 RBBs.

RESULTS

Of the 51 RBBs evaluated, 44 (86%) were still in situ and functional and 7 (14%) failed. The main reason for failure was repeated debonding. The effect of age, gender, the grade of operator and experience, bridge location, design of the bridge, span length and moisture control during cementation, could not be demonstrated.

CONCLUSION

The effect of age, gender, the grade of operator and experience, bridge location, design of the bridge, span length and moister control on RBB survival could not be demonstrated. Majority of patients with hypodontia showed satisfaction with resin bonded bridges. In replacing congenitally missing teeth in patients with hypodontia, resin-bonded bridges would be an acceptable treatment option.

Bond Strength Evaluation of Inlay-Retained Resin-Bonded Fixed Partial Dentures with Two Different Cavity Designs and Two Different Adhesive Systems: In Vitro Study

Background/Aim: The purpose of this in-vitro study was to compare the resin-bonded fixed partial dentures (RBFPD) fabricated using two different structural designs and two different antibacterial adhesive lutting protocols in regard to their resistance to debonding.

Material and Methods: Forty samples for a model with single missing molar were divided into 4 groups (M1, M2, C1, C2) (n=10). M1 and M2 were prepared in accordance with modified inlay slot-cavity retained RBFPD design; C1 and C2 were prepared according to conventional inlay slot-cavity retained RBFPD design. M1 and C1 cavities were treated with 2% chlorhexidine-based (CHX) cavity disinfectant and 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) containing adhesive system; M2 and C2 cavities were treated with MDP and 12-methacryloyloxydodecylpyridinium bromide (MDPB) containing adhesive system featuring antibacterial cavity cleansing effect. The RBFPDs were made of base-metal alloy and their fit surfaces sandblasted with aluminium oxide (Al2O3). Adhesive resin cement was used for cementation, and the RBFPD retainers were interlocked into their corresponding inlay cavities using composite resin. After 1 week being immersed in aqueous environment, the RBFPDs were subjected to tensile loading at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min until failure. One way ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests were used for statistical evaluation (α=0.05). Mode of failure and tooth damage was also noted.

Results: Mean tensile bond strength values were 356 N for M1, 305 N for M2, 467 N for C1, and 455 N for C2. Tensile strength values of C1 and C2 were significantly higher than those of M1 and M2 (p<0.05). The mode of failure was mostly adhesive in character at the metal-cement interface in all groups. Tooth fracture was observed nearly in all specimens. No significant difference was detected between the antibacterial adhesive lutting protocols (p>0.05).

Conclusions: The RBFPDs with the conventional design were found to be more retentive than those with the modified design. Using an adhesive system featuring antibacterial properties with no need of separate antibacterial agent application during bonding may be favourable.

Ten-year clinical evaluation of posterior fixed-movable resin-bonded fixed partial dentures

OBJECTIVES

Two-unit cantilevered resin-bonded fixed partial dentures (RBFPDs) offer long-term retention for anterior and premolar-sized spans. At this center, molar and longer spans have been restored with fixed-movable (FM) RBFPDs to overcome the lower retention rates of fixed-fixed RBFPDs. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the long-term longevity and the patient-reported outcomes of posterior FM-RBFPDs.

METHODS

Posterior FM-RBFPDs that had been inserted at least five years were reviewed. Survival was "retention of the original prosthesis in mouth" and success was "survival of prosthesis and absence of complications requiring treatment intervention". Prosthesis location, number of units, insertion year, tooth/teeth replaced and operator experience were collected. Patients' acceptance to FM-RBFPDs were assessed using prosthesis satisfaction questionnaire and Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-49). Results were analyzed using log-rank and cox-regression tests at significance level α = 0.05.

RESULTS

One-hundred-and-one prostheses were examined. The mean observation time was 126.4 ± 32.2 months. Thirty-six (35.6%) and 63 (62.4%) FM-RBFPDs were rated as success and survival respectively. Prostheses inserted after year 2001 (n = 69) experienced 42.0% (n = 29) success and 75.4% (n = 52) survival, and its survival rate was significantly better than those inserted in or before 2001 (p = 0.01). Five- and ten-year cumulative survival probability of FM-RBFPDs inserted after year 2001 were 82.3% and 74.1% respectively. The most frequent complications were debonding among 34 (33.7%) prostheses. Patients' acceptance were high.

CONCLUSIONS

More recently inserted prostheses showed improved longevity and patients' acceptance to posterior FM-RBFPDs were high.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Fix-Movable RBFPDs are a viable tooth replacement option in the posterior region.

The Use of All-Ceramic Resin-Bonded Bridges in the Anterior Aesthetic Zone

For several years, all-ceramic resin-bonded bridges (RBBs) have been considered an aesthetic treatment option for the replacement of missing teeth in the anterior region. With continued developments in technology, various different ceramic materials have been used to fabricate all-ceramic RBBs including zirconia, glass-reinforced, alumina-based ceramics, and lithium disilicate glass ceramics. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of all-ceramic RBBs, the advantages and disadvantages associated with these prostheses, as well as to demonstrate their application in replacing missing anterior teeth. Clinical relevance: To present the current literature and clinical application of all-ceramic resin-bonded bridges for replacing missing anterior teeth.

A fixed movable resin-bonded fixed dental prosthesis--A 16 years clinical report

PATIENTS

This report describes the case of a 48-year-old female patient who initially received a 4-unit fixed-fixed (FF) resin-bonded fixed dental prosthesis (RBFDP) for replacement of mandibular left second premolar and first molar. Twenty-one months later, debond of the RBFDP was found at one of retainers. A new fixed-movable RBFDPs with a modified non-rigid connector as well as increased resistance form features was placed and successfully retained at the 16-year clinical review.

DISCUSSION

RBFDPs are a conservative tooth replacement option that requires minimum tooth preparation and retention by a resin cement to etched enamel. However debonding is the most frequently seen complication and has been attributed to the relative movement between abutment teeth during function that stress the bonding interface. This case report highlights the use of modified non-rigid connector which allows relative movement between abutment teeth and therefore a reduced stress on the bonding interface.

CONCLUSION

It is proposed that the use of modified non-rigid connectors that allow independent movement between the abutment teeth during function was responsible for the long term clinical success of fixed-movable RBFDPs.

Minimally invasive preparation and design of a cantilevered, all-ceramic, resin-bonded, fixed partial denture in the esthetic zone: a case report and descriptive review

Resin-bonded, fixed partial dentures have the potential to offer a minimally invasive, fixed-prosthetic approach to tooth replacement in patients who may not be candidates for implant therapy. However, traditional preparation protocols often recommend extensive preparation designs on two abutment teeth, thereby potentially compromising the long-term health of the adjacent abutments and often resulting in unilateral debonding of one of the retainers in the long term. In light of advances in high-strength ceramic systems capable of being reliably bonded to tooth structure and offering improved esthetic outcomes, as well as clinical and case-series research demonstrating improved survivability of cantilevered resin-bonded fixed partial dentures, new preparation designs and methodologies can be advocated. The following case report demonstrates the clinical application of sonoabrasion, coupled with a dental operating microscope, to minimally prepare a single abutment for a cantilevered, all-ceramic resin-bonded fixed partial denture. Relevant historic and contemporary literature regarding double versus single-retainer resin-bonded fixed partial dentures are reviewed, as well as clinical conditions that are most favorable for such restorations to have an optimal long-term prognosis.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

If appropriate clinical conditions exist, a cantilevered, all-ceramic, resin-bonded, fixed partial denture may be the most conservative means of tooth replacement in a patient who is not a candidate for an endosseous implant.

The clinical performance of hybrid bridges delivered by undergraduate dental students: a retrospective study

The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyse the clinical performance of hybrid bridges and their effect on periodontal health. All the bridges in this study were delivered by undergraduate dental students at the University Dental School and Hospital Cork. The recall protocol took the form of a questionnaire and a full clinical examination of the abutments, retainers and contra lateral control teeth. In all, 22 patients with 25 bridges were examined. The periodontal response was generally favourable and soft tissue alteration was minimal. The outcome of the performance hybrid bridges is not encouraging, as 32% (8) of the bridges failed and 68% (17) were in service with a mean duration of clinical service of 48 months.

Survival of resin-bonded bridgework provided for post-orthodontic hypodontia patients with missing maxillary lateral incisors

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the clinical performance and factors influencing the survival of resin-bonded bridgework provided for hypodontia patients with missing maxillary lateral incisors, following orthodontic treatment to open, maintain or redistribute the missing tooth space.

DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of patients treated at a single centre using case notes with all patients invited for review to corroborate findings.

SETTING

Departments of Orthodontics, Child Dental Health and Restorative Dentistry, Newcastle upon Tyne Dental Hospital and School.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Between 1989-2000, 59 suitable hypodontia patients were identified of whom 45 had complete records. For these patients 73 resin-bonded bridges (RBBs) were provided. Following invitation, 24 patients attended for a review appointment. The survival of the RBBs, grade of operator providing treatment, duration of post-orthodontic retention, the influence of design, presence of pontic contact in static and dynamic excursions, and the effect of habits were assessed. Life table, Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis were carried out for the 73 RBBs with complete records. A separate analysis of the RBBs provided for patients who attended for the invited review did not show a higher failure rate than those patients who did not attend. Therefore both sets of data were combined.

RESULTS

Of the 73 RBBs provided, 30 had debonded on at least one occasion (41.1%), six of these debonds were due to trauma (20%). The mean survival time of all the restorations was 59.3 months, with a median survival time of 59 months. Senior members of staff (Consultant, Senior Lecturer or Specialist Trainee) provided most restorations (n = 39) and achieved the highest mean survival of 72.6 months and median survival time of 100+ months. RBBs provided by junior staff and students had significantly lower survival times (p <0.05) compared with senior staff. Risk of failure was 3.9 times greater with junior staff and 2.5 times greater with students (p = 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively). Analysis of all the other factors investigated showed no statistical difference in survival times or in hazard ratios. Analysis of fixed/fixed versus cantilevered bridges was limited by the number of fixed/fixed bridges (n = 11), and only two cantilevered bridges with multiple abutments were provided; both failed within one month.

CONCLUSION

RBBs provided for post-orthodontic hypodontia patients with missing maxillary lateral incisors can for many patients be an acceptable and definitive restoration. Experienced staff achieved the best results, but why this should be was not explained by the individual factors analysed in this study.

Retrospective survival analysis of 3-unit fixed-fixed and 2-unit cantilevered fixed partial dentures

To evaluate the cumulative survival (CS) rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) retained by full-veneer retainers, and those of resin-bonded FPDs provided by graduating dental students for the replacement of a single missing tooth. In 168 patients, 61 3-unit fixed-fixed FPDs and 25 2-unit cantilevered FPDs retained by full-veneer retainers, and 77 3-unit fixed-fixed resin-bonded FPDs and 47 2-unit cantilevered resin-bonded FPDs, were examined for their retention and integrity. The periodontal health, endodontic status and coronal tissues of all abutment teeth were also evaluated. The survival rates of these various designs were analysed with the Kaplan-Meier method. The mean age of all FPDs was 31 months. At 48 months after their insertion, 3-unit FPDs retained by full-veneer retainers had a CS rate of 82%, followed by 2-unit resin-bonded FPDs at 81%, 2-unit FPDs retained by full-veneer retainers at 77%, and 3-unit resin-bonded FPDs at 63%. No significant difference was found between the four designs (P>0.05). Up to both 48 and 60 months, the most common causes of failure were endodontic for FPDs retained by full-veneer retainers, and dislodgement for resin-bonded FPDs. The 3-unit fixed-fixed FPDs retained by full-veneer retainers had the most favourable prognosis after 48 months for replacing a single missing tooth, but the difference between designs was not statistically significant.

Clinical complications in fixed prosthodontics

The purpose of this article is to identify the incidence of complications and the most common complications associated with single crowns, fixed partial dentures, all-ceramic crowns, resin-bonded prostheses, and posts and cores. A Medline and an extensive hand search were performed on English-language publications covering the last 50 years. The searches focused on publications that contained clinical data regarding success/failure/complications. Within each type of prosthesis, raw data were combined from multiple studies and mean values calculated to determine what trends were noted in the studies. The lowest incidence of clinical complications was associated with all-ceramic crowns (8%). Posts and cores (10%) and conventional single crowns (11%) had comparable clinical complications incidences. Resin-bonded prostheses (26%) and conventional fixed partial dentures (27%) were found to have comparable clinical complications incidences. The 3 most common complications encountered with all-ceramic crowns were crown fracture (7%), loss of retention (2%), and need for endodontic treatment (1%). The 3 most common complications associated with posts and cores were post loosening (5%), root fracture (3%), and caries (2%). With single crowns, the 3 most common complications were need for endodontic treatment (3%), porcelain veneer fracture (3%), and loss of retention (2%). When fixed partial denture studies were reviewed, the 3 most commonly reported complications were caries (18% of abutments), need for endodontic treatment (11% of abutments), and loss of retention (7% of prostheses). The 3 most common complications associated with resin-bonded prostheses were prosthesis debonding (21%), tooth discoloration (18%), and caries (7%).

Management of missing maxillary lateral incisors

BACKGROUND

Missing maxillary lateral incisors create an esthetic problem with specific orthodontic and prosthetic considerations. The purpose of this article is to describe treatment protocols and problems encountered in the management of this disorder.

CASE DESCRIPTION

The two common treatment options are orthodontic space opening for future restorations or orthodontic space closure using canines to replace the missing maxillary lateral incisors. The required amount of space opening and the various prosthetic options are discussed. The methods for reshaping canines in orthodontic space closure and building them up to simulate lateral incisors also are described. The indications, advantages and disadvantages of both treatment modalities are outlined to help clinicians make decisions in borderline situations.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Teamwork between the orthodontist, general practitioner and restorative dentist is important when analyzing factors related to individual patients and establishing overall treatment plans. This also will allow treatment modalities and the various options for replacing missing maxillary lateral incisors in space opening to be discussed between team members and the patient.

A five-year multi-practice clinical study on posterior resin-bonded bridges

Previous clinical observations have revealed that resin-bonded bridges for posterior tooth replacements are less retentive than anterior resin-bonded bridges. Improved bonding procedures and preparation designs, however, may have a positive effect on the functional durability of these restorations. The present study reports the final analysis of a randomized controlled clinical trial in which different designs of posterior resin-bonded bridges were evaluated for a period of at least 5 years. The operational hypothesis was that the bonding system and the preparation design used in posterior resin-bonded bridges have an influence on the survival and clinical functioning of these restorations. Survival in this study was defined at two levels: (1) 'complete' survival (survival without any debonding), and (2) 'functional' survival (survival including loss of retention on one occasion and successful rebonding of the original RBB without further debonding). With regard to 'complete' survival, no significant differences were found between the bonding systems used for adherence of the restorations to abutment teeth (etching/Clearfil F2, sandblasting/Panavia EX, and silica-coating/Microfill Pontic C). The variable 'preparation form' (conventional preparation form vs. modified preparation form) for complete survival was statistically in favor of the modified preparation form (62% vs. 46%), but did not influence the functional survival. With regard to 'functional' survival, the combination of silica coating and Microfill Pontic C was more retentive than the other bonding systems (90% survival vs. 72% and 75%, p < 0.01). Factor location was found to be highly significant for both survival levels [Cox's PH model, p = 0.0002 (Cox, 1972)]: The five-year 'complete' survival rates were 65% for maxillary restorations and 40% for mandibular restorations, while the five-year 'functional' survival rates were 89% and 68%, respectively. It is concluded that preparation of grooves in abutment teeth for posterior resin-bonded bridges is beneficial to their chance of survival. Resin-bonded bridges placed in the maxilla have a better prognosis than those made in the mandible. The bonding systems used in this study appear to have no influence on the chance of failure. In rebonded posterior resin-bonded bridges, the bonding system silica-coating/Microfill Pontic C was more retentive than the other systems tested.

Resin-bonded fixed partial dentures: a review of three decades of progress

The resin-bonded fixed partial denture has undergone significant changes in design, materials and tooth preparation since its development in 1973. The selection of resin cement and micromechanical retention have closely paralleled alloy-resin-bonding research. Despite impressive in vitro research results, only 74 percent of the prostheses are still functional at the end of four years. Understanding the limitations, indications and design of resin-bonded fixed partial dentures will result in improved longevity and patient satisfaction.

Bonding of a cobalt-chromium alloy with acidic primers and tri-n-butylborane-initiated luting agents

Limited information is available about chemical bonding of cobalt-chromium alloys for resin-retained fixed partial dentures. This study evaluated the effect of acidic primers on the bonding of luting agents joined to a cobalt-chromium alloy. Disk alloy specimens were bonded with eight combinations of five primers and two luting agents. Shear bond strengths were determined before and after thermocycling. The effect of priming on bond strength varied among the combinations of primer and luting agent. In particular, after thermocycling three groups demonstrated greater bond strengths than the other groups did. These were (1) specimens treated with a phosphate-methacrylate primer (Cesead Opaque Primer), (2) specimens bonded with an adhesive resin (Super-Bond Opaque), or (3) a combination of both.