Three-body wear of light-activated composite veneering materials

Influence of laboratory light sources on the wear characteristics of indirect composites

The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the influence of light sources on the mechanical properties and wear characteristics of indirect composite materials. The two composite materials used were Estenia C&B and Epricord. The three laboratory polymerization units used, of which the wavelength range was 400-500 nm, were Hyper LII (two metal halide lamps of 4.82 mW/cm(2)), α-Light II (one halogen lamp and two fluorescent tubes of 3.60 mW/cm(2)), and Labolight LV-II (three fluorescent tubes of 0.63 mW/cm(2)). Three-body wear test was performed using indirect composite plate specimens, a gold alloy antagonist, and a polymer slurry. Wear depths of Estenia C&B polymerized with Hyper LII, α-Light II, and Labolight LV-II were 5.7, 18.5, and 64.2 µm respectively, whereas those of Epricord were 12.9, 18.7, and 48.5 µm respectively. Results showed that, after 100,000 cycles of localized loading, high-intensity light sources were effective in enhancing the wear resistance of both composite materials.

Changes in color and staining of dental composite resins after wear simulation

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to measure the discoloration as well as the change in staining of composite resins after wear simulation.

METHODS

Generalized wear simulation was performed with a three-body wear testing device for 400,000 cycles for six composite resins. A flat-planed stylus made with polyacetal resin was loaded perpendicularly under a load of 76-80 N. Color of nonworn and worn areas was measured with a spectrophotometer before and after staining with 0.5% methylene blue solution. Nonworn surface served as a control. Differences in color between nonworn and worn surfaces were calculated to indicate the change in color due to wear. Color change after staining with 0.5% methylene blue solution for nonworn and worn surfaces was calculated to observe the changes in staining.

RESULTS

Color difference (DeltaE(*) (ab)) between nonworn and worn surfaces was in the range of 0.8-1.4 before staining, which increased to 1.1-3.9 after staining. Color change by staining with methylene blue in nonworn surface was 6.8-20.6, and that in worn surface was 5.2-17.8. Therefore, staining in nonworn surface was higher than that in worn surface (p < 0.05). Generalized wear simulation for approximately 3 years of clinical service resulted in acceptable color change before staining (DeltaE(*) (ab) < 3.3). After staining, color difference between nonworn and worn surface increased to not-acceptable value in one composite resin investigated.

Changes in gloss after simulated generalized wear of composite resins

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Generalized wear of composite resins in the noncontact area may result in changes of gloss, which can influence esthetics of restorations.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine the changes in gloss of composite resins after generalized wear simulation. Surface roughness and amount of wear were measured for comparison.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Generalized wear simulation was performed with a wear tester for 400,000 cycles with 6 composite resins (Estelite Sigma, Esthet X improved, Filtek Supreme, Heliomolar, Renamel Microfill, and Tetric-Ceram). Composite resin was placed into a mold (8 mm in diameter, 3 mm in depth) in an acrylic resin block, and 8 specimens were prepared per group. A flat-planed stylus made with polyacetal was loaded perpendicularly. Gloss was measured after every 100,000 cycles with a glossmeter in gloss units (GU). Average surface roughness (R(a)) of each specimen before and after 400,000 cycles of wear was determined. The amount of wear was measured with a 3-dimensional profilometer. Changes in gloss were analyzed by repeated-measures analysis of variance, and mean values were compared by Fisher's PLSD interval (alpha=.05).

RESULTS

Gloss was influenced by the number of wear cycles and the composite resin, and there was a significant interaction (P=.000) between the number of wear cycles and the brand of composite resin. There were no significant correlations between the wear depth and the gloss or changes in gloss after 400,000 cycles.

CONCLUSION

Generalized wear simulation for approximately 3 years of clinical use resulted in gloss changes of 36 to 64 GU, and maximum wear depth was in the range of 35 to 75 mum. Change in gloss varied among the composite resins, but average surface roughness was not influenced by the various composite resins.

Wear and surface roughness of current prosthetic composites after toothbrush/dentifrice abrasion

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Surface changes of prosthetic composites caused by toothbrushing are known, although composite materials have been improved and are now widely used for various kinds of prosthetic restorations.

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the influence of toothbrushing on abrasive wear and surface roughness of current prosthetic composites.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Seven composite materials (Artglass, Axis, Cesead II, Conquest Sculpture, Estenia, Infis, and Targis) were assessed, and a machinable ceramic material (Cerec 2 Vitablocs) was used as a reference. Composite specimens polymerized with their proprietary curing units and sectioned ceramic specimens were stored in water for 14 days, and subsequently subjected to toothbrush-dentifrice abrasion. The amount of vertical loss and the surface roughness of each specimen after 20,000 strokes were determined with a profilometer. Average values of groups of 5 specimens were compared with ANOVA and Duncan new multiple range test.

RESULT

Significantly (P < .05) less wear was observed with respect to the Targis (10.01 microm; SD = 0.53 microm) and Estenia (13.04 microm; 1.95 microm) materials than for the other composites assessed, whereas Artglass (34.08 microm; 3.66 microm) and Conquest Sculpture (31.78 microm; 4.67 microm) materials demonstrated the most wear. The least surface roughness was exhibited by Conquest Sculpture (Ra, 0.54 microm; 0.07 microm) material, and the greatest by Cesead II (1.10 microm; 0.13 microm). Ceramic material showed a more wear-resistant (4.54 microm; 0.79 microm) and smoother (0.26 microm; 0.02 microm) surface than any of the composite materials.

CONCLUSION

Abrasion and surface roughness of the prosthetic composites caused by toothbrushing varied in accordance with the material. Type of prosthetic composite significantly influenced the surface condition after toothbrushing.

Three-body wear associated with three ceramics and enamel

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Wear of human enamel is a clinical concern whenever opposing teeth need to be restored using ceramic restorations.

PURPOSE

This in vitro study investigated wear of human enamel and 3 dental ceramics: a conventional porcelain (Vitadur Alpha), a low-fusing hydrothermal ceramic (Duceram-LFC), and a machinable ceramic (Vita Mark II) in a 3-body wear test.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty pairs of tooth-ceramic specimens were tested in a dental wear machine, under a standard load (40 N), rate (80 cycles/minute), and for 25,000 cycles in a simulated food slurry medium. Amount of wear was determined by measuring the height loss of the tooth and depth of wear track of the ceramic materials. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze the data, followed by Bonferroni multiple comparisons method to produce sets of simultaneous 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

ANOVA revealed significant differences between the groups for both enamel wear (P =. 002) and ceramic wear (P <.001). Further comparisons (95% CI significance level) revealed that the difference in enamel wear produced by Alpha porcelain and Duceram-LFC ceramic material was not statistically significant, whereas that produced by Vita Mark II ceramic was significantly less. Vita Mark II ceramic was significantly more resistant to wear than Alpha porcelain and Duceram-LFC ceramic. Furthermore, Alpha porcelain was significantly more resistant to wear than Duceram-LFC ceramic.

CONCLUSION

The abrasiveness of Alpha porcelain and Duceram-LFC ceramic was similar, yet both were significantly more abrasive than Vita Mark II ceramic. In addition, Vita Mark II was the most wear-resistant ceramic and Duceram-LFC ceramic the least resistant.

Evaluation of wear of selected prosthetic materials in contact with enamel and dentin

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

The proper choice of prosthetic materials for restoration of occlusal surfaces is important for the protection of the hard tissue of the opposing teeth and for regular functioning of the stomatognathic system.

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the resistance to wear of gold, Palliag M, Dentacolor, Chromasit, and Stellon materials and the enamel and dentin of natural teeth during functional contacts in an artificial oral environment with and without an abrasion material (Al2 O3 ).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The 5 nonceramic prosthetic materials used in the restoration of occlusal surfaces of fixed partial dentures were examined in contact with enamel and dentin during a simulated masticatory process in 2 environments (with and without abrasion). Wear was evaluated by means of a special device designed for wear examination.

RESULTS

The findings highlighted that the wear of nonceramic prosthetic materials in contact with enamel or dentin was similar. Dentin showed greater wear when in contact with these materials than with the enamel surface.

CONCLUSION

Artificial environmental factors significantly influenced the wear of the hard tissue of teeth, especially when in contact with materials having low microhardness.