Concepts in biology: A survey of practical methodological principles

Location and foraging as basis for classification of biotic interactions

Ecologists face an overwhelming diversity of ecological relationships in natural communities. In this paper, I propose to differentiate various types of the interspecific relations on the basis of two factors: relative localization and foraging activity of interacting partners. I advocate recognition of four types of environments: internal, surface, proximate external and distant external. Then I distinguish four types of synoikia-one partner lives in different degree of proximity to another; and four types of synmensalism: one partner forages in different degree of proximity to another. Intersection of localization-based (four subtypes of synoikia) and foraging-based (four subtypes of synmensalism) rows results in 16 types of interactions. This scheme can serve as a framework that manages diverse biotic interactions in a standardized way. I have made the first step to set up nomenclature standards for terms describing interspecific interactions and hope that this will facilitate research and communication.

Ecological Units: Definitions and Application

Concepts of ecological units, such as population, community, and ecosystem, are at the basis of ecological theory and research and have increasingly become the focus of conservation strategies. Concepts of these units still suffer from inconsistencies and confusions over terminology. The different concepts are treated here together as a common "conceptual cluster," with similar ecological functions (roles) and similar problems in their definition and use. An analysis of the multitude of existing terms and concepts that have been developed for these units reveals that they differ with respect to at least four basic criteria: (i) the questions as to whether they are defined statistically or via a network of interactions; (ii) if their boundaries are drawn by topographical or process-related criteria; (iii) how high the required internal relationships are; and (iv) if they are perceived as "real" entities or abstractions by an observer The various definitions cannot be easily sorted into just a few types, but they can be characterized by several independent criteria. I argue that serious problems arise if the different possibilities of defining ecological units are not recognized and if the concepts are perceived as self-evident. The different concepts of ecological units should be defined and used in a philosophically informed manner I propose a dual approach to the use of ecological units. Generic meanings of the main concepts (especially population, community, and ecosystem) should be retained only as heuristically useful perspectives, while specific and "operational" definitions of the concepts as units should be developed, depending on specific purposes of their use. Some thoughts on the basic requirements for such definitions and the domains of their uses are briefly explained.

Adaptedness, evolution and a hierarchical concept of fitness

Fitness is a consequence of the adaptedness of an entity to its environment. The fitness of an evolutionary entity, when the entity is defined by a set of attributes determining how it interacts with its environment, is manifested as persistence of those attributes. Two measures of fitness are presented to explicate this concept: (1) an extensive measure of the persistence of the original set of attributes in the individual entity and its descendants, but corrected for evolution; this includes as a special case fitness as used in population genetics; and, (2) an intensive measure that is independent of the abundance of descendant exemplars. Fitness as conceived here is a function of survival time, degree of evolution, and when applicable, reproductive contribution. The rate of fitness increase of an entity will vary inversely with the degree of evolutionary change experienced by the entity, its descendants, or both through time. Adaptive evolution can increase the length of time that fitness accumulates by increasing the survival of descendants possessing all or some of the ancestral attributes. Reproduction, where possible, can increase the number of descendants. This concept of fitness is simple, unambiguous, coherent, and applicable to entities at any hierarchical level of interest to ecologists and evolutionary biologists.