A model of bacterial DNA segregation based upon helical geometry

Hunting the Cell Cycle Snark

In this very personal hunt for the meaning of the bacterial cell cycle, the snark, I briefly revisit and update some of the mechanisms we and many others have proposed to regulate the bacterial cell cycle. These mechanisms, which include the dynamics of calcium, membranes, hyperstructures, and networks, are based on physical and physico-chemical concepts such as ion condensation, phase transition, crowding, liquid crystal immiscibility, collective vibrational modes, reptation, and water availability. I draw on ideas from subjects such as the 'prebiotic ecology' and phenotypic diversity to help with the hunt. Given the fundamental nature of the snark, I would expect that its capture would make sense of other parts of biology. The route, therefore, followed by the hunt has involved trying to answer questions like "why do cells replicate their DNA?", "why is DNA replication semi-conservative?", "why is DNA a double helix?", "why do cells divide?", "is cell division a spandrel?", and "how are catabolism and anabolism balanced?". Here, I propose some relatively unexplored, experimental approaches to testing snark-related hypotheses and, finally, I propose some possibly original ideas about DNA packing, about phase separations, and about computing with populations of virtual bacteria.

Successive Paradigm Shifts in the Bacterial Cell Cycle and Related Subjects

A paradigm shift in one field can trigger paradigm shifts in other fields. This is illustrated by the paradigm shifts that have occurred in bacterial physiology following the discoveries that bacteria are not unstructured, that the bacterial cell cycle is not controlled by the dynamics of peptidoglycan, and that the growth rates of bacteria in the same steady-state population are not at all the same. These paradigm shifts are having an effect on longstanding hypotheses about the regulation of the bacterial cell cycle, which appear increasingly to be inadequate. I argue that, just as one earthquake can trigger others, an imminent paradigm shift in the regulation of the bacterial cell cycle will have repercussions or "paradigm quakes" on hypotheses about the origins of life and about the regulation of the eukaryotic cell cycle.

Analysis of a model for minichromosome segregation in Escherichia coli

The present article contains a theoretical, quantitative analysis of the implications of the Helmstetter-Leonard model (1987, J. molec. Biol. 197, 195-204.) for the segregation of chromosomal DNA in Escherichia coli, on the expected copy-number distribution of minichromosomes in a culture in steady-state exponential growth. According to the model, two determinants are involved in the mechanism of chromosome segregation: a partition system that assures the equal allotment of chromosomes between daughter cells at cell division, and a locus within the minimal oriC region that specifies the attachment site of the chromosomes to the cell envelope at initiation of replication. There are many parameters that must be taken into account in such a study, and since some of them are probabilistic in nature, a strictly analytical approach is not feasible and we had to resort to computer simulation. A wide range of parameter values was tested, in all combinations. The minichromosome copy-number distributions obtained all had a prominent mode equal to the number of oriC binding sites and their main features were determined essentially by that and very little by any of the other parameters of the model. In order to avoid the unrealistic situation in which this one feature completely dominates the results, the original model was modified so that each individual minichromosome is no longer required to replicate during every cell generation, by introducing a limit to the number of unsuccessful attempts to locate a suitable binding site. The copy-number distributions predicted by this version of the model are quantitatively and qualitatively very different and depend on all the components of the model. The simulation results are sufficiently well-behaved to allow consideration as to whether a particular empirical minichromosome copy-number distribution--when such data become available--could in fact be governed by the proposed model; it may even be possible to get a rough estimate for the different parameters involved.

Positioning of replicated chromosomes in Escherichia coli

The positioning of replicated chromosomes at one-fourth and three-fourths of the cell length was inhibited when protein synthesis was inhibited by chloramphenicol or rifampin or by starvation for amino acids. Under these conditions, the progress of chromosome replication continued and replicated chromosomes were located close to each other as one nucleoid mass at midcell. Cells which already had two separate daughter chromosomes located at the cell quarters divided into two daughter cells under these conditions. When protein synthesis resumed, daughter chromosomes moved from midcell to the cell quarters, respectively, before any detectable increase in cell length was observed. The chromosome positioning occurred even under inhibition of the initiation of chromosome replication and under inactivation of DNA gyrase. The chromosome positioning presumably requires new synthesis of a particular protein(s) or translation itself.

Chromosome partitioning in Escherichia coli: novel mutants producing anucleate cells

To study the chromosomal partitioning mechanism in cell division, we have isolated a novel type of Escherichia coli mutants which formed anucleate cells, by using newly developed techniques. One of them, named mukA1, is not lethal and produces normal-sized anucleate cells at a frequency of 0.5 to 3% of total cells in exponentially growing populations but does not produce filamentous cells. Results suggest that the mutant is defective in the chromosome positioning at regular intracellular positions and fails frequently to partition the replicated daughter chromosomes into both daughter cells, resulting in production of one anucleate daughter cell and one with two chromosomes. The mukA1 mutation causes pleiotropic effects: slow growth, hypersensitivity to sodium dodecyl sulfate, and tolerance to colicin E1 protein, in addition to anucleate cell formation. Cloning of the mukA gene indicates that the mukA1 mutation is recessive and that the mukA gene is identical to the tolC gene coding for an outer membrane protein.

Cellular location of origin and terminus of replication in Bacillus subtilis

The origin of replication of Bacillus subtilis 168 trp thy dna-1 (temperature-sensitive initiation mutant) was labeled with [3H]thymidine. Analysis of labeled cells by autoradiography revealed that most of the radioactivity was associated with cell pole areas. To label the terminus, cells that had initiated were treated with chloramphenicol to inhibit cell growth and division but to allow continued DNA synthesis. These cells were then labeled with [3H]thymidine at a time when chromosome replication was nearly complete. The distribution of radioactivity was similar to that observed in origin-labeled cells. In contrast, exponentially growing cells that were labeled for a brief time at the permissive temperature showed a random distribution of radioactivity. These data indicate that the origin and terminus of replication are located at cell poles.