A model for chromosome movement based on lateral interaction of spindle microtubules

The motor for poleward chromosome movement in anaphase is in or near the kinetochore

I have tested two contending views of chromosome-to-pole movement in anaphase. Chromosomes might be pulled poleward by a traction fiber consisting of the kinetochore microtubules and associated motors, or they might propel themselves by a motor in the kinetochore. I cut through the spindle of demembranated grasshopper spermatocytes between the chromosomes and one pole and swept the polar region away, removing a portion of the would-be traction fiber. Chromosome movement continued, and in the best examples, chromosomes moved to within 1 micron of the cut edge. There is nothing beyond the edge to support movement, and a push from the rear is unlikely because cuts in the interzone behind the separating chromosomes did not stop movement. Therefore, I conclude that the motor must be in the kinetochore or within 1 micron of it. Less conclusive evidence points to the kinetochore itself as the motor. The alternative is an external motor pulling on the kinetochore microtubules or directly on the kinetochore. A pulling motor would move kinetochore microtubules along with the chromosome, so that in a cut half-spindle, the microtubules should protrude from the cut edge as chromosomes move toward it. No protrusion was seen; however, the possibility that microtubules depolymerize as they are extruded, though unlikely, is not ruled out. What is certain is that the motor for poleward chromosome movement in anaphase must be in the kinetochore or very close to it.

Relationship between the arrangement of microtubules and chromosome behaviour of syntelic autosomal univalents during prometaphase in crane fly spermatocytes

During meiotic prometaphase of crane fly spermatocytes, syntelic autosomal univalents are able to move between the spindle poles several times. The relationship between the behaviour of chromosomes and the arrangement of microtubules during this stage was studied using a fixation technique (Nicklas et al. 1979) which makes it possible to examine a certain cell in an electron microscope after live observation. After reorientation, when a syntelic univalent had started moving towards the opposite spindle pole, a short chromosome fibre was found. When a univalent had reached the equator, a chromosome fibre could be traced up to the spindle apex. During the movement towards the opposite spindle pole the degree of disorder in the chromosome fibre was high, whereas it was low in the fibre of a motionless univalent. The degree of disorder was determined by the relative proportion of skew fibre microtubules. At the beginning of reorientation a chromosome fibre was still present, but later, it was no longer possible to recognize such a fibre. Instead of a chromosome fibre, a bundle of microtubules laterally associated with the kinetochore was observed. Some microtubules of this bundle had a direct contact with the kinetochore. These observations strongly hint that the laterally associated microtubules have an important function in the reorientation of syntelic autosomal univalents.

The distribution of intermicrotubular bridges in meiotic spindles of the crane fly

The distribution of intermicrotubular bridges in spindles of tipulid spermatocytes (Pales ferruginea, first meiotic division) was analyzed using serial sections of pre-selected cells. Bridges were found in all spindle regions, including kinetochore microtubules and free microtubules in the chromosome fiber. The dimensions of bridges were variable, ranging between 60 and 300 A in length and 40 and 190 A in thickness. Bridges seem to be randomly distributed. No accumulation in or absence from particular spindle regions was detected. Quantitative analysis revealed a linear, positive correlation between the number of microtubules and the number of microtubule pairs capable of forming bridges and, on the other hand, between microtubule pairs and intermicrotubular bridges. The possible composition and significance of bridges are discussed.

Analysis of the spatial organization of microtubule-associated proteins

We have developed microdensitometer-computer correlation techniques to analyze the arrangement of microtubule arms and bridges (i.e., microtubule-associated proteins [MAPs]). A microdensitometer was used to scan immediately adjacent to the wall of longitudinally sectioned microtubules in positive transparency electron micrographs. Signal enhancement procedures were applied to the digitized densitometer output to produce a binary sequence representing the apparent axial spacing of MAP projections. These enhanced records were analyzed in two ways. (a) Autocorrelograms were formed for each record and correlogram peaks from a group of scans were pooled to construct a peak frequency histogram. (b) Cross-correlation was used to optimize the match between each enhanced record and templates predicted by different models of MAP organization. Seven symmetrical superlattices were considered as well as single axial repeats. The analyses were repeated with randomly generated records to establish confidence levels. Using the above methods, we analyzed the intrarow bridges of the Saccinobaculus axostyle and the MAP2 projections associated with brain microtubules synthesized in vitro. We confirmed a strict 16-nm axial repeat for axostyle bridges. For 26 MAP2 records, the only significant match was to a 12-dimer superlattice model (P less than 0.002). However, we also found some axial distances between MAP2 projections which were compatible with the additional spacings predicted by a 6-dimer superlattice. Therefore, we propose that MAP2 projections are arranged in a "saturated 12-dimer, unsaturated 6-dimer" superlattice, which may be characteristic of a wide variety of MAPs.