Bacterial DNA segregation: its motors and positional control

Multidomain ribosomal protein trees and the planctobacterial origin of neomura (eukaryotes, archaebacteria)

Palaeontologically, eubacteria are > 3× older than neomura (eukaryotes, archaebacteria). Cell biology contrasts ancestral eubacterial murein peptidoglycan walls and derived neomuran N-linked glycoprotein coats/walls. Misinterpreting long stems connecting clade neomura to eubacteria on ribosomal sequence trees (plus misinterpreted protein paralogue trees) obscured this historical pattern. Universal multiprotein ribosomal protein (RP) trees, more accurate than rRNA trees, are taxonomically undersampled. To reduce contradictions with genically richer eukaryote trees and improve eubacterial phylogeny, we constructed site-heterogeneous and maximum-likelihood universal three-domain, two-domain, and single-domain trees for 143 eukaryotes (branching now congruent with 187-protein trees), 60 archaebacteria, and 151 taxonomically representative eubacteria, using 51 and 26 RPs. Site-heterogeneous trees greatly improve eubacterial phylogeny and higher classification, e.g. showing gracilicute monophyly, that many 'rDNA-phyla' belong in Proteobacteria, and reveal robust new phyla Synthermota and Aquithermota. Monoderm Posibacteria and Mollicutes (two separate wall losses) are both polyphyletic: multiple outer membrane losses in Endobacteria occurred separately from Actinobacteria; neither phylum is related to Chloroflexi, the most divergent prokaryotes, which originated photosynthesis (new model proposed). RP trees support an eozoan root for eukaryotes and are consistent with archaebacteria being their sisters and rooted between Filarchaeota (=Proteoarchaeota, including 'Asgardia') and Euryarchaeota sensu-lato (including ultrasimplified 'DPANN' whose long branches often distort trees). Two-domain trees group eukaryotes within Planctobacteria, and archaebacteria with Planctobacteria/Sphingobacteria. Integrated molecular/palaeontological evidence favours negibacterial ancestors for neomura and all life. Unique presence of key pre-neomuran characters favours Planctobacteria only as ancestral to neomura, which apparently arose by coevolutionary repercussions (explained here in detail, including RP replacement) of simultaneous outer membrane and murein loss. Planctobacterial C-1 methanotrophic enzymes are likely ancestral to archaebacterial methanogenesis and β-propeller-α-solenoid proteins to eukaryotic vesicle coats, nuclear-pore-complexes, and intraciliary transport. Planctobacterial chaperone-independent 4/5-protofilament microtubules and MamK actin-ancestors prepared for eukaryote intracellular motility, mitosis, cytokinesis, and phagocytosis. We refute numerous wrong ideas about the universal tree.

Multidomain ribosomal protein trees and the planctobacterial origin of neomura (eukaryotes, archaebacteria)

Palaeontologically, eubacteria are > 3× older than neomura (eukaryotes, archaebacteria). Cell biology contrasts ancestral eubacterial murein peptidoglycan walls and derived neomuran N-linked glycoprotein coats/walls. Misinterpreting long stems connecting clade neomura to eubacteria on ribosomal sequence trees (plus misinterpreted protein paralogue trees) obscured this historical pattern. Universal multiprotein ribosomal protein (RP) trees, more accurate than rRNA trees, are taxonomically undersampled. To reduce contradictions with genically richer eukaryote trees and improve eubacterial phylogeny, we constructed site-heterogeneous and maximum-likelihood universal three-domain, two-domain, and single-domain trees for 143 eukaryotes (branching now congruent with 187-protein trees), 60 archaebacteria, and 151 taxonomically representative eubacteria, using 51 and 26 RPs. Site-heterogeneous trees greatly improve eubacterial phylogeny and higher classification, e.g. showing gracilicute monophyly, that many 'rDNA-phyla' belong in Proteobacteria, and reveal robust new phyla Synthermota and Aquithermota. Monoderm Posibacteria and Mollicutes (two separate wall losses) are both polyphyletic: multiple outer membrane losses in Endobacteria occurred separately from Actinobacteria; neither phylum is related to Chloroflexi, the most divergent prokaryotes, which originated photosynthesis (new model proposed). RP trees support an eozoan root for eukaryotes and are consistent with archaebacteria being their sisters and rooted between Filarchaeota (=Proteoarchaeota, including 'Asgardia') and Euryarchaeota sensu-lato (including ultrasimplified 'DPANN' whose long branches often distort trees). Two-domain trees group eukaryotes within Planctobacteria, and archaebacteria with Planctobacteria/Sphingobacteria. Integrated molecular/palaeontological evidence favours negibacterial ancestors for neomura and all life. Unique presence of key pre-neomuran characters favours Planctobacteria only as ancestral to neomura, which apparently arose by coevolutionary repercussions (explained here in detail, including RP replacement) of simultaneous outer membrane and murein loss. Planctobacterial C-1 methanotrophic enzymes are likely ancestral to archaebacterial methanogenesis and β-propeller-α-solenoid proteins to eukaryotic vesicle coats, nuclear-pore-complexes, and intraciliary transport. Planctobacterial chaperone-independent 4/5-protofilament microtubules and MamK actin-ancestors prepared for eukaryote intracellular motility, mitosis, cytokinesis, and phagocytosis. We refute numerous wrong ideas about the universal tree.

The neomuran revolution and phagotrophic origin of eukaryotes and cilia in the light of intracellular coevolution and a revised tree of life

Three kinds of cells exist with increasingly complex membrane-protein targeting: Unibacteria (Archaebacteria, Posibacteria) with one cytoplasmic membrane (CM); Negibacteria with a two-membrane envelope (inner CM; outer membrane [OM]); eukaryotes with a plasma membrane and topologically distinct endomembranes and peroxisomes. I combine evidence from multigene trees, palaeontology, and cell biology to show that eukaryotes and archaebacteria are sisters, forming the clade neomura that evolved ~1.2 Gy ago from a posibacterium, whose DNA segregation and cell division were destabilized by murein wall loss and rescued by the evolving novel neomuran endoskeleton, histones, cytokinesis, and glycoproteins. Phagotrophy then induced coevolving serial major changes making eukaryote cells, culminating in two dissimilar cilia via a novel gliding-fishing-swimming scenario. I transfer Chloroflexi to Posibacteria, root the universal tree between them and Heliobacteria, and argue that Negibacteria are a clade whose OM, evolving in a green posibacterium, was never lost.

Origin of the cell nucleus, mitosis and sex: roles of intracellular coevolution

BACKGROUND

The transition from prokaryotes to eukaryotes was the most radical change in cell organisation since life began, with the largest ever burst of gene duplication and novelty. According to the coevolutionary theory of eukaryote origins, the fundamental innovations were the concerted origins of the endomembrane system and cytoskeleton, subsequently recruited to form the cell nucleus and coevolving mitotic apparatus, with numerous genetic eukaryotic novelties inevitable consequences of this compartmentation and novel DNA segregation mechanism. Physical and mutational mechanisms of origin of the nucleus are seldom considered beyond the long-standing assumption that it involved wrapping pre-existing endomembranes around chromatin. Discussions on the origin of sex typically overlook its association with protozoan entry into dormant walled cysts and the likely simultaneous coevolutionary, not sequential, origin of mitosis and meiosis.

RESULTS

I elucidate nuclear and mitotic coevolution, explaining the origins of dicer and small centromeric RNAs for positionally controlling centromeric heterochromatin, and how 27 major features of the cell nucleus evolved in four logical stages, making both mechanisms and selective advantages explicit: two initial stages (origin of 30 nm chromatin fibres, enabling DNA compaction; and firmer attachment of endomembranes to heterochromatin) protected DNA and nascent RNA from shearing by novel molecular motors mediating vesicle transport, division, and cytoplasmic motility. Then octagonal nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) arguably evolved from COPII coated vesicle proteins trapped in clumps by Ran GTPase-mediated cisternal fusion that generated the fenestrated nuclear envelope, preventing lethal complete cisternal fusion, and allowing passive protein and RNA exchange. Finally, plugging NPC lumens by an FG-nucleoporin meshwork and adopting karyopherins for nucleocytoplasmic exchange conferred compartmentation advantages. These successive changes took place in naked growing cells, probably as indirect consequences of the origin of phagotrophy. The first eukaryote had 1-2 cilia and also walled resting cysts; I outline how encystation may have promoted the origin of meiotic sex. I also explain why many alternative ideas are inadequate.

CONCLUSION

Nuclear pore complexes are evolutionary chimaeras of endomembrane- and mitosis-related chromatin-associated proteins. The keys to understanding eukaryogenesis are a proper phylogenetic context and understanding organelle coevolution: how innovations in one cell component caused repercussions on others.

Fine-structure evidence for cell membrane partitioning of the nucleoid and cytoplasm during bud formation in Hyphomonas species

Hyphomonas spp. reproduce by budding from the tip of the prosthecum, distal to the main body of the reproductive cell; thus, the chromosome must travel through the prosthecum to enter the progeny, the swarm cell. When viewed by electron microscopy, negatively stained whole cells, ultrathin-sectioned cells, and freeze-etched and frozen hydrated cells all had marked swellings of the cytoplasmic membrane (CM) in the prosthecum which are termed pseudovesicles (PV). PV were separated by constrictions in the contiguous CM. In replicating cells, PV housed ribosomes and DNA, which was identified by its fibrillar appearance and by lactoferrin-gold labeling. The micrographs also revealed that the CM bifurcates at the origin of the prosthecum so that one branch partitions the main body of the reproductive cell from the prosthecum and swarm cell. The results of this fine-structure analysis suggest models explaining DNA segregation and the marked asymmetric polarity of the budding reproductive cell.

Hypothesis: chromosome separation in Escherichia coli involves autocatalytic gene expression, transertion and membrane-domain formation

To explain how daughter chromosomes are separated into discrete nucleoids and why chromosomes are partitioned with pole preferences, I propose that differential gene expression occurs during DNA replication in Escherichia coli. This differential gene expression means that the daughter chromosomes have different patterns of gene expression and that cell division is not a simple process of binary fission. Differential gene expression arises from autocatalytic gene expression and creates a separate proteolipid domain around each developing chromosome via the coupled transcription-translation-insertion of proteins into membranes (transertion). As these domains are immiscible, daughter chromosomes are simultaneously replicated and separated into discrete nucleoids. I also propose that the partitioning relationship between chromosome age and cell age arises because the poles of cells have a proteolipid composition that favours transertion from one nucleoid rather than from the other. This hypothesis forms part of an ensemble of related hypotheses which attempt to explain cell division, differentiation and wall growth in bacteria in terms of the physical properties and interactions of the principal constituents of cells.

Nucleoid partitioning and the division plane in Escherichia coli

Escherichia coli nucleoids were visualized after the DNA of OsO4-fixed but hydrated cells was stained with the fluorochrome DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride hydrate). In slowly growing cells, the nucleoids are rod shaped and seem to move along the major cell axis, whereas in rapidly growing, wider cells they consist of two- to four-lobed structures that often appear to advance along axes lying perpendicular or oblique to the major axis of the cell. To test the idea that the increase in cell diameter following nutritional shift-up is caused by the increased amount of DNA in the nucleoid, the cells were subjected to DNA synthesis inhibition. In the absence of DNA replication, the nucleoids continued to move in the growing filaments and were pulled apart into small domains along the length of the cell. When these cells were then transferred to a richer medium, their diameters increased, especially in the region enclosing the nucleoid. It thus appears that the nucleoid motive force does not depend on DNA synthesis and that cell diameter is determined not by the amount of DNA per chromosome but rather by the synthetic activity surrounding the nucleoid. Under the non-steady-state but balanced growth conditions induced by thymine limitation, nucleoids become separated into small lobules, often lying in asymmetric configurations along the cell periphery, and oblique and asymmetric division planes occur in more than half of the constricting cells. We suggest that such irregular DNA movement affects both the angle of the division plane and its position.

A class of gyrB mutants, substantially unaffected in DNA topology, suppresses the Escherichia coli K12 ftsZ84 mutation

Previous work in our laboratory suggested that DNA topology could be implicated in the regulation of the division gene ftsZ. To settle this question, we have selected and characterized mutants in the gyrB gene able to phenotypically suppress the defects of the ftsZ84 mutation. No strict correlation was found between the degree of plasmid DNA relaxation and the level of suppression of the thermosensitivity of the ftsZ84 strain. Interestingly, the class of mutants that shows maximal suppression is substantially unaffected in DNA topology. In addition, the amount of ftsZ-specific mRNA in this class of mutants is comparable to that present in the ftsZ84 strain. These results hint that the ability of these gyrB mutants to correct the effects of the ftsZ84 mutation is largely unrelated to the function of the GyrB (as a part of DNA gyrase) in the control of DNA superhelicity and suggest hitherto unsuspected interaction between the ftsZ and gyrB gene products.

Analysis of a model for minichromosome segregation in Escherichia coli

The present article contains a theoretical, quantitative analysis of the implications of the Helmstetter-Leonard model (1987, J. molec. Biol. 197, 195-204.) for the segregation of chromosomal DNA in Escherichia coli, on the expected copy-number distribution of minichromosomes in a culture in steady-state exponential growth. According to the model, two determinants are involved in the mechanism of chromosome segregation: a partition system that assures the equal allotment of chromosomes between daughter cells at cell division, and a locus within the minimal oriC region that specifies the attachment site of the chromosomes to the cell envelope at initiation of replication. There are many parameters that must be taken into account in such a study, and since some of them are probabilistic in nature, a strictly analytical approach is not feasible and we had to resort to computer simulation. A wide range of parameter values was tested, in all combinations. The minichromosome copy-number distributions obtained all had a prominent mode equal to the number of oriC binding sites and their main features were determined essentially by that and very little by any of the other parameters of the model. In order to avoid the unrealistic situation in which this one feature completely dominates the results, the original model was modified so that each individual minichromosome is no longer required to replicate during every cell generation, by introducing a limit to the number of unsuccessful attempts to locate a suitable binding site. The copy-number distributions predicted by this version of the model are quantitatively and qualitatively very different and depend on all the components of the model. The simulation results are sufficiently well-behaved to allow consideration as to whether a particular empirical minichromosome copy-number distribution--when such data become available--could in fact be governed by the proposed model; it may even be possible to get a rough estimate for the different parameters involved.