Aortic valve replacement in the conscious patient under regional anesthesia without endotracheal intubation

A prospective cohort study comparing monitored anesthesia care and intubated general anesthesia in cardiac surgery involving cardiopulmonary bypass

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility and safety of monitored anesthesia care (MAC) versus intubated general anesthesia (IGA) for patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

METHODS

This prospective observational study included patients scheduled for cardiac surgery involving CPB at our institution between April 2012 and February 2017. The enrolled patients were categorized into MAC and IGA groups. MAC involved local anesthesia at the sternotomy site, sedation with dexmedetomidine, analgesia with remifentanil/sufentanil, and electroacupuncture (EA). Eleven patients underwent MAC, and 13 patients received IGA. There were no instances of conversion from MAC to IGA, and both groups exhibited no major complications. The demographic characteristics, baseline parameters, and operative variables were comparable between the two groups.

RESULTS

Intraoperative opioid consumption was significantly lower in the MAC group compared to the IGA group (P < 0.001). The time to oral intake of liquids was significantly shorter in the MAC group (2.14 ± 0.90 h) compared to the IGA group (22.31 ± 3.33 h) (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the intensive care unit length of stay (ICU-LOS) and perioperative vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS) were significantly reduced in the MAC group compared to the IGA group (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

MAC emerges as a safe and viable alternative to general anesthesia for specific patient groups undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB. Furthermore, it may enhance postoperative recovery and minimize postoperative complications compared to IGA.

Neuraxial Anesthesia in Patients With Aortic Stenosis: A Systematic Review

Neuraxial anesthesia (NA) has been contraindicated in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) due to concerns of sympathetic blockade and hemodynamic instability. These considerations are based on precautionary expert recommendations, supported by expected physiologic effects, but in the absence of any published scientific evidence. In light of the increasing elderly population and the prevalence of AS, this systematic review compiles available literature on NA in patients with AS to address the understanding of the anesthetic practice and safety in this population. Using a systematic approach, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for studies of patients with AS who exclusively received NA. Primary outcomes included intraoperative and postoperative complications. Of 1,433 citations, 61 met full-text inclusion criteria, including 3,228 patients undergoing noncardiac (n = 3,146, 97.5%), obstetric (n = 69, 2.1%), and cardiac (n = 13, 0.4%) procedures. Significant data heterogeneity (local anesthetic dosing, intraoperative interventions, and measured outcomes) prevented formal metanalysis, but descriptive data are presented. Spinal block (n = 2,856, 88.5%) and epidural anesthesia (n = 397, 12.3%) were administered most frequently. Hypotension requiring vasopressors was the most common intraoperative complication-noncardiac (n = 16, 9.9%), obstetric (n = 6, 13.0%), and cardiac (n = 1, 7.7%)-with resolution in all patients and no reported intraoperative cardiovascular collapse or mortality. The relative risk of different AS severities remains unclear, and optimal medication dosing remains elusive. The authors' data suggested that NA may not be contraindicated in carefully selected patients with AS. The authors' results should inform the design of future prospective studies comparing NA and general anesthesia in patients with AS.

Comparing Conscious Sedation With Regional Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia in Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery With Right-Sided Minithoracotomy: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVES

The aims of the present study were to evaluate and compare the safety and feasibility, including hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, frequency of conversion to general anesthesia (GA), pH, PaCO₂, and PaO₂, of selected patients who underwent minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) via a right minithoracotomy under conscious sedation (CS) to avoid GA. The authors also aimed to evaluate the perioperative management of spontaneous breathing.

DESIGN

A retrospective, observational study.

SETTING

Single-center.

PARTICIPANTS

This study enrolled 101 patients who underwent MIMVS under CS or GA.

INTERVENTIONS

The patients who underwent MIMVS were managed under CS or GA according to indication criteria.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

ICU stay (p = 0.010), postoperative time until first fluid intake (p < 0.0001), and duration of mechanical ventilation (p = 0.004) were shorter in the CS group than in the GA group. No patients converted to GA from CS. PaCO₂ during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in the CS group was significantly lower than that in the GA group. However, PaCO₂ at the termination of CPB in the CS group was significantly higher than that in the GA group.

CONCLUSIONS

In the CS group, advanced-age patients with comorbidities underwent mitral surgery without postoperative complications. The authors' findings suggested that MIMVS under CS could be a potentially less-invasive method, providing a quicker recovery than MIMVS under GA.

[Open heart surgery under acupuncture ? Decrypting a program broadcast on France 2]

OBJECTIVES

To analyze a clip from the program ? Acupuncture, osteopathy, hypnosis: do complementary medicines have superpowers ? about acupuncture as an anesthetic for surgical procedures in China. To propose a rational explanation for the phenomena observed. To describe the processes leading a public service broadcasting channel to offer this type of content at prime time and the potential consequences in terms of public health.

METHOD

Analysis using critical thinking attitudes and skills, along with a bibliographical search of Medline, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library databases.

RESULTS

The information delivered in the television clip is ambiguous. It does not allow the viewer to form an informed opinion on the relevance of acupuncture as an anesthetic for surgical procedures. It is reasonable to assume that the clip shows surgery performed with undisclosed epidural anesthesia coupled with mild intravenous anesthesia, sometimes performed in other countries. What needs to be highlighted here is the overestimation of acupuncture added to the protocol. The media tend to exaggerate the risks and expected effects of the treatments they report on, which can lead patients to turn to unproven therapies.

CONCLUSION

Broadcasting such a clip at prime time underlines the urgent need for the public and all health professionals to be trained in sorting and critically analyzing health information.

[Coronary artery bypass grafting in conscious patients: a procedure with a perspective?]

Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting increasingly show severe co-morbidities, which can negatively affect the outcome. Recent developments in cardiac surgery have therefore focused on minimizing the invasiveness of the procedure by revascularization on the beating heart without cardiopulmonary bypass, and by reducing surgical trauma using smaller surgical incisions. Progress in minimally invasive cardiac surgery has led to minimally invasive anesthesia, i.e. using high thoracic epidural anesthesia as the sole technique in the conscious patient (awake coronary artery bypass grafting, ACAB). Published data on ACAB procedures in smaller cohorts have demonstrated that the procedure is safe. Significant complications occurred in 7.1% of patients. A particular cause of concern during ACAB surgery is the development of spinal epidural hematoma the risk of which has been estimated to be as high as 1:1,000. A thorough risk-benefit analysis has therefore to be made. Currently, ACAB surgery remains limited to few specialized centers and highly selected patients.

Cervical Epidural Anesthesia: A Safe Alternative to General Anesthesia for Patients Undergoing Cancer Breast Surgery

BACKGROUND

General anesthesia (GA) is the standard anesthesia for patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy (MRM) for breast cancer. Cervical epidural anesthesia (CEA) is practiced less often because of its reported complications. This prospective study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of CEA as an anesthetic technique for MRM.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty breast cancer patients with ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) grade I or II underwent MRM under CEA from September 2004 to January 2006. Anesthesia was induced with 10 ml of 1% lignocaine; adrenaline was administered through an 18-gauge catheter in C(6)-C(7) or C(7)-T(1) epidural space. Postoperative analgesia was maintained with 0.125% bupivacaine through the epidural catheter.

RESULTS

In 49 (98%) patients surgery was conducted smoothly under CEA with good analgesia. 44 patients were awake during surgery. Five patients had to be given intravenous sedation with midazolam, and in one case the procedure was terminated after accidental dura puncture. There were no clinically significant variations in perioperative pulse and respiratory rate, and there was no fall in mean arterial blood pressure during the procedure. The mean preoperative anesthesia time and total cost of the procedure was 20.36 + 2.75 minutes and 12.19 + 2.2 pound, respectively. All patients were started on a liquid diet and mobilized 4 hours after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Cervical epidural anesthesia is a safe alternative to GA and was preferred by our patients because of its lower cost and reduced perioperative morbidity.

Intrathecal and Epidural Anesthesia and Analgesia for Cardiac Surgery

Adequate postoperative analgesia prevents unnecessary patient discomfort. It may also decrease morbidity, postoperative hospital length of stay and, thus, cost. Achieving optimal pain relief after cardiac surgery is often difficult. Many techniques are available, and all have specific advantages and disadvantages. Intrathecal and epidural techniques clearly produce reliable analgesia in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Additional potential benefits include stress response attenuation and thoracic cardiac sympathectomy. The quality of analgesia obtained with thoracic epidural anesthetic techniques is sufficient to allow cardiac surgery to be performed in awake patients without general endotracheal anesthesia. However, applying regional anesthetic techniques to patients undergoing cardiac surgery is not without risk. Side effects of local anesthetics (hypotension) and opioids (pruritus, nausea/vomiting, urinary retention, and respiratory depression), when used in this manner, may complicate perioperative management. Increased risk of hematoma formation in this scenario has generated much of lively debate regarding the acceptable risk-benefit ratio of applying regional anesthetic techniques to patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Composite Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Grafts via Standard Sternotomy for Lateral Wall Revascularization in Conscious Patients

BACKGROUND

A new technique has been developed that permits complete arterial revascularization of the lateral wall of the heart using in situ bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts in awake patients. This technique, performed without cardiopulmonary bypass or mechanical ventilation, creates the least invasive revascularization method for the lateral wall of the heart yet described.

METHODS

In 4 patients, double or triple vessel coronary artery bypass grafting was performed without general anesthesia. A high thoracic epidural anesthesia was started 1 hour before surgery. Bilateral internal thoracic arteries were harvested and all anastomoses were performed with the off-pump technique via standard median sternotomy. Circumflex branches were anastomosed with the left internal thoracic artery via a heart positioner.

RESULTS

All patients remained awake throughout the whole procedure. There was no perioperative myocardial infarction or mortality. Pneumothorax was observed in only 1 patient and did not hinder the procedure. There were no hemodynamic changes during lateral wall revascularization. Two patients required unexpected coronary endarterectomy during circumflex and right coronary artery anastomoses.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete arterial revascularization via median sternotomy using in situ bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts without general anesthesia is a feasible and safe procedure for multivessel disease. This approach allows for complete coronary artery revascularization in patients with contraindications for general anesthesia with or without cardiopulmonary bypass.

Conscious Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass Using Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia Without Endotracheal General Anesthesia

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of thoracic epidural anesthesia as an alternative technique to general anesthesia in patients undergoing cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass.

DESIGN

A prospective study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral heart hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Eleven patients underwent cardiac surgical procedures requiring cardiopulmonary bypass under thoracic epidural anesthesia from February to April 2004.

INTERVENTIONS

An epidural catheter was inserted at C7 to T2 intervertebral space on the day before the operation. Subsequently, cardiac surgery was performed using cardiopulmonary bypass.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

The midsternotomy approach was used in all the patients. Anticoagulation was achieved with 300 units/kg of heparin. Under normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass, 6 patients underwent closure of atrial septal defect, 3 underwent valve replacements, and 2 underwent coronary artery bypass surgery combined with valve replacements. Soon after establishing cardiopulmonary bypass, all but 1 patient developed apnea, which was reversed after termination of cardiopulmonary bypass. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 102 +/- 28 minutes, the aortic cross-clamp time was 58 +/- 28 minutes, and the total duration of surgery was 229 +/- 64 minutes. There was no mortality or morbidity in this series.

CONCLUSION

Cardiac surgical procedures requiring cardiopulmonary bypass may be performed under thoracic epidural anesthesia, without endotracheal general anesthesia.