Carcinoma of the lung

Prevalence and Predictability of Occult Satellite Nodules in Clinical Stage Ia Non-small Cell Lung Cancer following Lobectomy

INTRODUCTION

We sought to assess the prevalence and clinical predictors of satellite nodules in patients undergoing lobectomy for clinical stage Ia disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried for patients who underwent lobectomy for clinical stage cT1N0 NSCLC. Collaborative staging information was used to identify patients who were pathologically upstaged based on having separate tumor nodules in the same lobe as the primary tumor. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association of clinical factors with the detection of separate nodules.

RESULTS

A separate tumor nodule was recorded in 2.8% (n = 1284) of 45,842 clinical stage Ia patients treated with lobectomy or bilobectomy. Female gender (3.1% vs. male 2.5%; P = .002) and non-squamous histology (adenocarcinoma 3.2% and large cell neuroendocrine 3.0% vs. squamous cell 1.9% tumors; P < .001) were associated with the presence of separate nodules. The frequency increased for tumors larger than 3 cm (≤ 3cm, 2.7% vs. > 3cm, 3.8%; P < .001). Other factors associated with separate nodules were upper lobe location, pleural and/or lymphovascular invasion and occult lymph node disease. The best predictive model for separate nodules based on the available clinical variables resulted in an area under the curve of 0.645 (95% CI 0.629-0.660).

CONCLUSION

Separate tumor nodules may be detected with a low but relatively consistent frequency across the spectrum of patients with clinical stage Ia NSCLC. The predictive ability using basic clinical factors in the database is limited.

Computed Tomography Features and Tumor Spread Through Air Spaces in Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Meta-analysis

To compare computed tomography (CT)-based radiologic features in patients, who are diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma with the pathologically detected spread of tumor cells through air spaces (STAS positive [STAS+]) and those with no STAS. PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were systematically searched for observational studies (either retrospective or prospective) of patients with lung adenocarcinoma that had compared CT-based features between STAS+ and STAS-negative cases (STAS-). The pooled effect sizes were reported as odds ratio (OR) and weighted mean difference (WMD). STATA software was used for statistical analysis. The meta-analysis included 10 studies. Compared with STAS-, STAS+ adenocarcinoma was associated with increased odds of solid nodule (OR: 3.30, 95% CI: 2.52, 4.31), spiculation (OR: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.36, 3.08), presence of cavitation (OR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.00, 2.22), presence of clear boundary (OR: 3.01, 95% CI: 1.70, 5.32), lobulation (OR: 1.65, 95% CI: 1.11, 2.47), and pleural indentation (OR: 1.98, 95% CI: 1.41, 2.77). STAS+ tumors had significant association with the presence of pulmonary vessel convergence (OR: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.61, 2.87), mediastinal lymphadenopathy (OR: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.20, 3.56), and pleural thickening (OR: 2.58, 95% CI: 1.73, 3.84). The mean nodule diameter (mm) (WMD: 6.19, 95% CI: 3.71, 8.66) and the mean solid component (%) (WMD: 24.5, 95% CI: 10.5, 38.6) were higher in STAS+ tumors, compared with STAS- ones. The findings suggest a significant association of certain CT-based features with the presence of STAS in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. These features may be important in influencing the nature of surgical management.

Guiding Principles in the Management of Synchronous and Metachronous Primary Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Multiple lung cancers can be found simultaneously, with incidence ranging from 1% to 8%. Documentation of more than 1 pulmonary lesion can be challenging, because these solid, ground-glass, or mixed-density tumors may represent multicentric malignant disease or intrapulmonary metastases. If mediastinal nodal and distant deposits are excluded, surgery should be contemplated. After surgical treatment of lung cancer, patients should be followed closely for an undetermined period of time. Good clinical judgment is of outmost importance in deciding which individuals will benefit from those surgical interventions and which are candidates for alternate therapies. Every case should be discussed in a multidisciplinary meeting.

Genomic heterogeneity of multiple synchronous lung cancer

Multiple synchronous lung cancers (MSLCs) present a clinical dilemma as to whether individual tumours represent intrapulmonary metastases or independent tumours. In this study we analyse genomic profiles of 15 lung adenocarcinomas and one regional lymph node metastasis from 6 patients with MSLC. All 15 lung tumours demonstrate distinct genomic profiles, suggesting all are independent primary tumours, which are consistent with comprehensive histopathological assessment in 5 of the 6 patients. Lung tumours of the same individuals are no more similar to each other than are lung adenocarcinomas of different patients from TCGA cohort matched for tumour size and smoking status. Several known cancer-associated genes have different mutations in different tumours from the same patients. These findings suggest that in the context of identical constitutional genetic background and environmental exposure, different lung cancers in the same individual may have distinct genomic profiles and can be driven by distinct molecular events.

Some patients present with multiple lung tumours but it is unclear whether these are metastases or individual lesions. Here, the authors use genomics techniques to demonstrate in six patients that multiple tumours have individual genetic profiles and represent separate tumours.

Surgical Treatment of Lung Cancer

In this chapter, we discuss the preoperative evaluation that is necessary prior to surgical resection, stage-specific surgical management of lung cancer, and the procedural steps as well as the indications to a variety of surgical approaches to lung resection.

Special treatment issues in non-small cell lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines

BACKGROUND

This guideline updates the second edition and addresses patients with particular forms of non-small cell lung cancer that require special considerations, including Pancoast tumors, T4 N0,1 M0 tumors, additional nodules in the same lobe (T3), ipsilateral different lobe (T4) or contralateral lung (M1a), synchronous and metachronous second primary lung cancers, solitary brain and adrenal metastases, and chest wall involvement.

METHODS

The nature of these special clinical cases is such that in most cases, meta-analyses or large prospective studies of patients are not available. To ensure that these guidelines were supported by the most current data available, publications appropriate to the topics covered in this article were obtained by performing a literature search of the MEDLINE computerized database. Where possible, we also reference other consensus opinion statements. Recommendations were developed by the writing committee, graded by a standardized method, and reviewed by all members of the Lung Cancer Guidelines panel prior to approval by the Thoracic Oncology NetWork, Guidelines Oversight Committee, and the Board of Regents of the American College of Chest Physicians.

RESULTS

In patients with a Pancoast tumor, a multimodality approach appears to be optimal, involving chemoradiotherapy and surgical resection, provided that appropriate staging has been carried out. Carefully selected patients with central T4 tumors that do not have mediastinal node involvement are uncommon, but surgical resection appears to be beneficial as part of their treatment rather than definitive chemoradiotherapy alone. Patients with lung cancer and an additional malignant nodule are difficult to categorize, and the current stage classification rules are ambiguous. Such patients should be evaluated by an experienced multidisciplinary team to determine whether the additional lesion represents a second primary lung cancer or an additional tumor nodule corresponding to the dominant cancer. Highly selected patients with a solitary focus of metastatic disease in the brain or adrenal gland appear to benefit from resection or stereotactic radiosurgery. This is particularly true in patients with a long disease-free interval. Finally, in patients with chest wall involvement, provided that the tumor can be completely resected and N2 nodal disease is absent, primary surgical resection should be considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Carefully selected patients with more uncommon presentations of lung cancer may benefit from an aggressive surgical approach.

Surgical treatment for non-small cell lung cancer with ipsilateral pulmonary metastases

PURPOSE

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the relevance of surgery in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with ipsilateral pulmonary metastases.

METHODS

The clinical records of 1,623 consecutive NSCLC patients who underwent surgery between 1990 and 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. Overall, 161 (9.9%) and 21 (1.3%) patients had additional nodules in the same lobe as the primary lesion (PM1) and additional nodules in the ipsilateral different lobe (PM2), respectively.

RESULTS

The 5-year survival rate was 54.4 % in the PM1 patients and 19.3% in the PM2 patients (log-rank test: p = 0.001). Tumor size ≤3 cm, N0-1 status and surgical procedures less extensive than bilobectomy were identified as favorable prognostic factors in the PM1 patients. The 5-year survival rate in the PM1-N0-1 patients was 68.7%, while that in the PM1-N2-3 patients was 29.1% (p < 0.0001). Compared to the non-PM1 stage IIIA patients, the stage IIIA patients with PM1 disease (PM1-N1) tended to experience longer survival times (p = 0.06). Squamous cell types and bilobectomy or more extensive procedures were found to be unfavorable factors in the PM2 patients. The survival of the PM2 patients was significantly worse than that of the other T4 patients (p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

PM1 patients with N0-1 disease are good candidates for surgery, whereas PM2 patients do not appear to benefit from surgery.

Prognostic heterogeneity in multilevel N2 non-small cell lung cancer patients: importance of lymphadenopathy and occult intrapulmonary metastases

BACKGROUND

To evaluate prognostic heterogeneity that may exist in multilevel N2 non-small lung cancer, we attempted to identify clinicopathologic prognostic factors for multilevel N2 patients who underwent standard surgeries.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated records from 1988 to December 2007 for 106 non-small lung cancer patients diagnosed with multilevel N2 disease by postoperative pathologic examination (49 women, 57 men; median age=61 years). Patients with clinical T4 (cT4) and bulky N2 (shortest mediastinal lymph node diameter>2 cm) disease were excluded from the study. Follow-up periods ranged from 2 to 240 months (median for living patients=36 months). Records were examined for age, sex, preoperative nodal status (cN2 versus cN0 or cN1), primary tumor sites, surgical procedure, metastatic stations (distribution and numbers), tumor sizes, histologic features, and adjuvant therapies.

RESULTS

By univariate analysis, cN (cN2), intrapulmonary metastases within the same lobe of the primary tumor (PM), and male sex were significant adverse prognostic factors; smoking only tended toward significance (p=0.1). Other clinicopathologic variables were not significant prognostic factors. By multivariate analysis, cN (cN2) and PM were significant prognostic factors. Patients who had neither cN2 nor PM had significantly higher survival rates than those who had either cN2 or PM (5-year survival rates of 36.5% and 11.2%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Multilevel N2 patients can be grouped according to the prognostic factors cN2 and PM. These findings have potential for evaluating the best therapeutic modalities or agents for multilevel N2 patients.

Treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, stage IIIB: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition)

OBJECTIVE

To develop evidence-based guidelines on best available treatment options for patients with stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

A review was conducted of published English-language (abstract or full text) phase II or phase III trials and guidelines from other organizations that address management of the various categories of stage IIIB disease. The literature search was provided by the Duke University Center for Clinical Health Policy Research and supplemented by any additional studies known by the authors.

RESULTS

Surgery may be indicated for carefully selected patients with T4N0-1M0. Patients with N3 nodal involvement are not considered to be surgical candidates. For individuals with unresectable disease, good performance score, and minimal weight loss, treatment with combined chemoradiotherapy results in better survival than radiotherapy (RT) alone. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy seems to be associated with improved survival compared with sequential chemoradiotherapy. Multiple daily fractions of RT when combined with chemotherapy have not been shown to result in improved survival compared with standard once-daily RT combined with chemotherapy. The optimal chemotherapy agents and the number of cycles of treatment to combine with RT are uncertain.

CONCLUSION

Prospective trials are needed to answer important questions, such as the role of induction therapy in patients with potentially resectable stage IIIB disease. Future trials are needed to answer the questions of optimal chemotherapy agents and radiation fractionation schedule. The role of targeted novel agents in combination with chemoradiotherapy is just starting to be investigated.

Special Treatment Issues in Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

This chapter of the guidelines addresses patients who have particular forms of non-small cell lung cancer that require special considerations. This includes patients with Pancoast tumors, T4N0,1M0 tumors, satellite nodules in the same lobe, synchronous and metachronous multiple primary lung cancers (MPLCs), solitary brain and adrenal metastases, and chest wall involvement.

METHODS

The nature of these special clinical cases is such that in most cases, metaanalyses or large prospective studies of patients are not available. For ensuring that these guidelines were supported by the most current data available, publications that were appropriate to the topics covered in this chapter were obtained by performance of a literature search of the MEDLINE computerized database. When possible, we also referenced other consensus opinion statements. Recommendations were developed by the writing committee, graded by a standardized method (see "Methodology for Lung Cancer Evidence Review and Guideline Development" chapter), and reviewed by all members of the lung cancer panel before approval by the Thoracic Oncology NetWork, Health and Science Policy Committee, and the Board of Regents of the American College of Chest Physicians.

RESULTS

In patients with a Pancoast tumor, a multimodality approach seems to be optimal, involving chemoradiotherapy and surgical resection, provided appropriate staging has been conducted. Patients with central T4 tumors that do not have mediastinal node involvement are uncommon. Such patients, however, seem to benefit from resection as part of the treatment as opposed to chemoradiotherapy alone when carefully staged and selected. Patients with a satellite lesion in the same lobe as the primary tumor have a good prognosis and require no modification of the approach to evaluation and treatment than what would be dictated by the primary tumor alone. However, it is difficult to know how best to treat patients with a focus of the same type of cancer in a different lobe. Although MPLCs do occur, the survival results after resection for either a synchronous presentation or a metachronous presentation with an interval of < 4 years between tumors are variable and generally poor, suggesting that many of these patients may have had a pulmonary metastasis rather than a second primary lung cancer. A thorough and careful evaluation of these patients is warranted to try to differentiate between patients with a metastasis and a second primary lung cancer, although criteria to distinguish them have not been defined. Selected patients with a solitary focus of metastatic disease in the brain or adrenal gland seem to benefit substantially from resection. This is particularly true in patients with a long disease-free interval. Finally, in patients with chest wall involvement, as long as tumors can be completely resected and there is absence of N2 nodal involvement, primary surgical treatment should be considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Carefully selected patients may benefit from an aggressive surgical approach.

Prognostic Factors in Resected Satellite–Nodule T4 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

The 1997 non-small cell lung cancer staging revisions assigned a T4 descriptor to satellite nodules in the primary tumor lobe. We reviewed our experience of satellite-nodule T4 non-small cell lung cancer following these revisions and evaluated prognostic factors for this group.

METHODS

All patients who underwent resection of non-small cell lung cancer between April 1997 and June 2005 with satellite nodule(s) confirmed at pathologic examination were identified from our institutional Lung Tumor Registry. Case notes and pathology reports were reviewed and data collected on possible prognostic factors. Survival was modeled using the Kaplan-Meier method, and survival differences between groups were analyzed using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

From 1,276 non-small cell lung cancer patients who underwent resection, 137 were staged pT4, and 35 were T4-satellite nodules. Median follow-up was 25 months (range, 1 to 102 months). Median main tumor size was 3.0 cm (range, 1 to 9.8 cm). Adenocarcinoma or bronchioloalveolar carcinoma was the predominant histologic diagnosis (n = 28; 80%). One-, 3- and 5-year survival was 86%, 69%, and 57%, respectively; median survival was 68 months. During the same period, 137 patients undergoing resection for all T4 lesions had a 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival of 68%, 53%, and 18%, respectively. Adenocarcinoma or bronchioloalveolar carcinoma histologic diagnosis (adenocarcinoma or bronchioloalveolar carcinoma versus squamous, 75% versus 67% 3-year survival; p = 0.0026), female gender (66% versus 49% for males, 5-year survival; p = 0.041), and absence of vascular invasion (no invasion versus vascular invasion, 74% versus 20% 5-year survival; p = 0.0101) were significant predictors of better survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival for resected T4 non-small cell lung cancer with satellite nodule(s) in the primary lobe is better than for other T4 lesions, and the T4 descriptor may unduly upstage these cases. The current T4 descriptor represents a heterogeneous population.

Intrapulmonary metastasis in resected pathologic stage IIIB non–small cell lung cancer: Possible contribution of aerogenous metastasis to the favorable outcome

OBJECTIVE

Non-small cell lung cancer with pulmonary metastasis in the primary lobe (PM+) is classified as pathologic stage IIIB. Although stage IIIB PM+ indicates a poor prognosis, this stage includes various subgroups with heterogeneous clinical outcomes. The objective of this study was to extract a subgroup of patients with stage IIIB PM+ non-small cell lung cancer with a better prognosis and assess their biological characteristics and metastatic mechanisms.

METHODS

We reviewed 122 cases of surgically resected stage IIIB PM+ non-small cell lung cancer and extracted a subgroup with a favorable outcome by univariate analysis of clinicopathologic factors. The 15 cases without lymph node metastasis and vessel invasion (PM+/N-/VI-) were extracted as the most favorable group. We assessed the clinicopathologic features of the PM+/N-/VI- group in comparison with the other patients with stage IIIB PM+ disease.

RESULTS

The disease-specific survival of the PM+/N-/VI- group was significantly better than that of the other stage IIIB PM+ group. Microscopic characteristics of the metastatic lesions suggesting that the cancer cells had invaded via the aerogenous route were seen in 86.7% of the PM+/N-/VI- group, as opposed to only 9.4% of the other PM+ cases. Furthermore, in all 4 patients in the PM+/N-/VI- group who had a recurrence, the relapse involved intrapulmonary metastasis, rather than distant organ metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Stage IIIB PM+ cases via the airway route were enriched in the PM+/N-/VI- group and had an extremely good survival. This group should be recognized as having local disease, and if relapse occurs in the remnant lobe, it may be possible to achieve a cure by local therapy.

Commonly encountered difficulties in pathologic staging of lung cancer

CONTEXT

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Despite technological, therapeutic, and scientific advances, most patients present with incurable disease and a poor chance of long-term survival. For those with potentially curable disease, lung cancer staging greatly influences therapeutic decisions. Therefore, surgical pathologists determine many facets of lung cancer patient care.

OBJECTIVE

To present the current lung cancer staging system and examine the importance of mediastinal lymph node sampling, and also to discuss particularly confusing and/or challenging areas in lung cancer staging, including assessment of visceral pleura invasion, bronchial and carinal involvement, and the staging of synchronous carcinomas.

DATA SOURCES

Published current and prior staging manuals from the American Joint Committee on Cancer and the International Union Against Cancer as well as selected articles pertaining to lung cancer staging and diagnosis accessible through PubMed (National Library of Medicine) form the basis of this review.

CONCLUSIONS

Proper lung cancer staging requires more than a superficial appreciation of the staging system. Clinically relevant specimen gross examination and histologic review depend on a thorough understanding of the staging guidelines. Common sense is also required when one is confronted with a tumor specimen that defies easy assignment to the TNM staging system.

The role of surgery in the treatment of stage III non—small-cell lung cancer

Stage III, locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer represents an incredibly heterogeneous group of patients. The majority of patients are treated with curative intent, but optimal therapy is controversial and the role of surgery is not well defined. Consensus has shown that the majority of patients with IIIB disease are not amenable to resection. The exceptions are selected patients with tumor stage 4 (T4) by virtue of a satellite nodule or those with isolated invasion of the spine, superior sulcus, carina, or vena cava. Surgery is more widely used for stage IIIA disease. Patients with nodal stage 2 (N2) disease represent the largest population of patients in stage III. Increasing evidence supports the use of surgery as part of a multimodality approach for N2 disease. The impact of surgery is partially determined by the bulk of the mediastinal node involvement. Patients with micrometastatic disease and single-station nodal involvement have the greatest chance for cure, and surgery appears to play a significant role in their treatment. Patients with bulky multistation disease are frequently not amenable to complete resection and may be best approached with definitive chemotherapy and radiation. In addition, the ability to sterilize mediastinal lymph nodes with induction therapy correlates strongly with survival following resection, but the ideal induction regime that balances the safety and efficacy has yet to be determined.

Prognosis of Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Intrapulmonary Metastases

BACKGROUND

In the current TNM staging system revised in 1997 for lung cancer, intrapulmonary metastases (PM) are classified into two categories: PM1 (in the same lobe of the primary tumor), designated as T4; and PM2 (in a different lobe), as M1. There have been no large-scale analyses on PM in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. We collected data nationwide in Japan for 7408 lung cancer patients undergoing surgical resection during a single year, 1994. We analyzed the long-term survival of NSCLC patients to evaluate the prognostic impact of PM in relation to other prognostic factors.

METHOD

Medical records of 6525 NSCLC patients undergoing surgical resection during a single year, 1994, were analyzed as a subset work of the Japanese Joint Committee of Lung Cancer Registry. The committee sent a questionnaire on outcome and clinicopathological profiles to 303 institutions.

RESULTS

There were 6080 PM0 (no PM), 317 PM1, and 128 PM2 patients. The 5-year survival rates were 55.1% for PM0 patients, 26.8% for PM1, and 22.5% for PM2 patients, respectively. The differences in survival between patients with PM0 and PM1 and between patients with PM0 and PM2 were significant (p < 0.001, respectively); the difference in survival was not significant between patients with PM1 and PM2 (p = 0.298). In R0 and N0 patients, survival differences were similar for PM0, PM1, and PM2 patients. Significant survival difference was detected between T3 and PM1 (p = 0.0317) and between PM1 patients and T4 patients excluding PM1 (p = 0.0083). The 5-year survival rates of PM2 patients and M1 patients excluding PM2 were 22.5% and 20.5%, respectively, and there was no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.434).

CONCLUSION

There was no significant survival difference between NSCLC patients with PM1 and PM2. The survival of patients with PM1 was between that of the T3 and T4 patients excluding PM1.

Surgical Resection for Multifocal (T4) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Is the T4 Designation Valid?

BACKGROUND

The current international staging system for lung cancer designates intralobar satellites as T4 disease. In this study, we sought to determine the impact of multifocal, intralobar non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) on patient survival and its potential relevance to stage designation.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of our thoracic surgical cancer registry from 1990 to 2005. Included were 53 patients with a resected lung cancer containing intralobar satellites detected preoperatively (n = 8) or in the resected specimen (n = 45). Patients with multicentric bronchioloalveolar cancer were excluded. All patients had an anatomic resection with mediastinal lymph node dissection. Median follow-up for the entire group was 31 months. Survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was performed to examine simultaneously the effects on overall survival of age, gender, nodal disease, number of satellite lesions, lymphatic invasion, and T status.

RESULTS

The median age of the 53 patients with multifocal, intralobar (T4) disease was 68 years and 31 were women. Ten patients had more than one satellite lesion. Overall 5-year survival was 47.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 27.36% to 65.30%) for all patients with resected intralobar satellites. Patients without nodal metastases had a 5-year survival of 58.4% (95% CI, 28.76% to 79.30%). The Cox regression identified female gender (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.31; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.96; p < 0.04) as a significant prognostic variable but only a trend towards significance for nodal status (adjusted HR, 2.3; 95% CI, .83 to 6.26; p < 0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with intralobar multifocal NSCLC detected in the resected specimen have a more favorable prognosis after surgical resection than might be predicted by their stage T4 designation. Five-year survival rates, especially in T4N0 patients, more closely approximate those with stages IB or II NSCLC.

Prognostic assessment after surgical resection for non-small cell lung cancer: experiences in 2083 patients

The importance of the TNM staging system for patient management, clinical research and communicating information about lung cancer is of international importance. Modifications of the TNM classification system is scheduled for the near future. A retrospective review of 2376 patients with primary non-small cell lung cancer treated in a monocentric institution between 1996 and 2005 was performed. The overall 5-year survival rate was 46.8%. A total of 2083 patients had complete resections with a 5-year survival of 50.7%. After complete resection the 5-year survival rates by pathological stage of the disease were as follows: 68.5% for IA, 66.6% for IB, 55.3% for IIA, 49.0% for IIB, 35.8% for IIIA, 35.4% for IIIB, and not defined (3-year survival: 33.1%) for IV. The difference in prognosis between stage IIB and IIIA was significant (p=0.001) there was no significant difference between IA and IB, between IB and IIA, between IIA and IIB, between IIIA and IIIB, or between IIIB and IV. In stage IV there was a significant difference in survival between patients with pulmonary metastases or distant extrapulmonary metastases (p=0.001). In multivariate analysis, we also found gender and histology to be independent significant prognostic factors for survival. Multiple factors influence the long-term survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer after surgical resection. The present stage related prognosis seems to characterize patient prognosis and outcome reliable. For further data review there should be a focus on stage IV disease.

Satellite Pulmonary Nodule in the Same Lobe (T4N0) Should Not Be Staged as IIIB Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Treatment of non-small cell lung cancer depends on stage. Patients with T4 lesions represent a heterogeneous group.

METHODS

A case-control study of patients with pathologically proven, node-negative T4 lesions (T4 N0 M0) was conducted. Patients with T4 disease were stratified as T4 from a satellite nodule (T4-satellite) or T4 from local invasion (T4-invasion). T4-satellite patients were matched 1:4 for sex and histology with resected control patients with stage IA, IB, and IIA non-small cell lung cancer and matched 1:3 with stage II non-small cell lung cancer. Survival and the maximal standardized uptake value on F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography scans were compared.

RESULTS

There were 337 patients, 26 patients with T4-satellite lesions, 25 with T4-invasion lesions, and 286 controls (104 patients with T1 N0 M0, 104 with T2 N0 M0, and 78 with T1 N1 M0 or T2 N1 M0 lesions). The two T4 groups were similar for age, race, sex, and neoadjuvant therapy rates. The 5-year survival was 80% for the T1 N0 M0 patients, 68% for T2 N0 M0, 57% for T4-satellite N0 M0, 45% for T1 N1 M0 or T2 N1 M0, and 30% for the T4-invasion N0 M0 patients (p = 0.016). Multivariate analysis showed that only the type of T4 impacted survival (p = 0.011). The median maximal standardized uptake values of the cancers were 4.2 for T1 N0 M0, 4.8 for T4-satellite, 5.4 for T2 N0 M0, 7.8 for T1 N1 M0 or T2 N1 M0, and 8.8 for the T4-invasion patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Larger studies are needed; however, patients with T4-satellite non-small cell lung cancer who undergo complete resection have survival and maximal standardized uptake values similar to patients with stage IB and stage IIA lesions. Their survival is significantly better than those with T4-invasion. Patients with T4-satellite N0 M0 lesions should not be classified as stage IIIB and should not be grouped with patients with T4-invasion, and resection should be considered.

Survival analyses of patients with thoracic complications secondary to bronchial carcinoma at the time of diagnosis

BACKGROUND

The impact on survival of thoracic complications secondary to bronchial carcinoma has not been clearly analyzed.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess the significance of these complications for the survival of lung cancer patients.

METHODS

All patients diagnosed at our center from March 2000 to January 2004 were analyzed to estimate survival among patients with or without thoracic complication. Any intrathoracic change or abnormality secondary to bronchial carcinoma such as atelectasis or pleural effusion was defined a thoracic complication. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the complications predicting survival were evaluated using Cox's regression analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 182 eligible patients, 61.5% had at least one thoracic complication. The complications were atelectasis, pulmonary metastases, pleural effusion, laryngeal nerve involvement, vena cava superior syndrome and others. Specific survival times for each complication were not different, except in the case of atelectasis. Median survival was significantly longer in patients with atelectasis, as opposed to nonatelectatic patients. Survival times in patients with at least one complication were not different than those of patients without complication. However, median survival of patients with one of the complications, excluding atelectasis (since this was associated with improved survival), was 3 months shorter (p = 0.029). Cox's regression analysis also predicted atelectasis for improved survival.

CONCLUSION

Atelectasis, which was determined to be the most frequent thoracic complication, was identified as a favorable prognostic factor in patients with advanced stage lung cancer.

Which Patients with Stage III Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer Should Undergo Surgical Resection?

The treatment of patients with stage III NSCLC remains controversial. Stage III NSCLC comprises a fairly heterogeneous group of tumors, and furthermore only sparse data from randomized clinical trials exist to guide therapy decisions. This review article proposes a management algorithm for patients with stage III NSCLC that is based upon the currently available data on surgical therapy, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. By necessity, given the paucity of strong data, a good deal of opinion is offered. The choice to proceed with aggressive, combined modality treatment is presented in light of extent of local disease as well as patient performance status.

Lung cancer. Special treatment issues

This chapter of the Lung Cancer Guidelines addresses patients with particular forms of non-small cell lung cancer that require special considerations. This includes patients with Pancoast tumors, T4N0,1M0 tumors, satellite nodules in the same lobe, synchronous and metachronous multiple primary lung cancers (MPLC), and solitary metastases. For patients with a Pancoast tumor, a multimodality approach, involving chemoradiotherapy and surgical resection, appears optimal provided appropriate staging has been carried out. Patients with central T4 tumors that do not have mediastinal node involvement are uncommon. When carefully staged and selected, however, such patients appear to benefit from resection as part of the treatment as opposed to chemoradiotherapy alone. Patients with a satellite lesion in the same lobe as the primary tumor have a good prognosis and require no modification of the approach to evaluation and treatment from what would be dictated by the primary tumor alone. On the other hand, it is difficult to know how best to treat patients with a focus of the same type of cancer in a different lobe. Although MPLC do occur, the survival results after resection for either a synchronous presentation or a metachronous presentation with an interval of < 4 years between tumors are variable and generally poor, suggesting that many of these patients may have had a pulmonary metastasis rather than a second primary lung cancer. A thorough and careful evaluation of these patients is warranted to try to differentiate between patients with a metastasis and those with a second primary lung cancer, although criteria to distinguish them have not been defined. Finally, some patients with a solitary focus of metastatic disease in the brain or adrenal gland appear to benefit substantially from resection.

Guidelines on treatment of stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer

Stage IIIB includes patients with T4, any N, M0, and any T, N3, M0. Surgery may be indicated only for carefully selected T4N0M0 patients with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. Patients with N3 lymph node involvement are not considered as surgical candidates. For patients with unresectable disease, good performance score, and minimal weight loss, treatment with combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy has resulted in better survival than treatment with radiotherapy alone. Multiple daily fractions of radiotherapy have not resulted in improved survival compared with standard fractionation once daily. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy appears to be associated with improved survival compared with sequential chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Treatment of stage IIIB due to malignant pleural effusion is addressed in the section that deals with stage IV disease.

Surgical resection of multifocal non-small cell lung cancer is associated with prolonged survival

BACKGROUND

Revisions in the international system for the staging of lung cancer, adopted in 1997, assigned the T4 descriptor to separate tumor nodules in the same lobe and the M1 descriptor to tumor nodules in a different lobe. Consequently, these changes shifted the stage of patients with these lesions to stage IIIB or stage IV. The goal of this review was to determine the impact of multifocal non-small cell lung cancer on survival.

METHODS

A database analysis of our cardiothoracic surgery tumor registry was performed to identify all patients who underwent surgical resection of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), who were ultimately determined to have pathologically node-negative disease from 1994 to 1999. All pathology reports were individually reviewed. Survival data were collected on each patient from the date of surgery with a mean duration of follow-up of 46.3 months. Kaplan Meier actuarial survival was determined for all patients.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients were identified who underwent complete resection of multiple NSCLC tumors. During this same period, 504 patients underwent complete resection of stage I NSCLC tumors. The 3-year actuarial survival for patients with T1/N0/M0 tumors was 79.6%. In comparison with patients with T1/N0/M0 tumors, the 3-year actuarial survival rates of patients with T2/N0/M0 tumors (72.3%, p = 0.056), T4/N0/M0 tumors (66.5%, p = 0.058), and T1 to T2/N0/M1 tumors (63.6%, p = 0.201) were lower. However, these differences did not achieve statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there was a trend toward decreased survival in patients with multifocal NSCLC compared with patients with stage I NSCLC, this did not achieve statistical significance. Importantly, survival in these subgroups of patients with stage IIIB or stage IV disease (stage determined solely on the basis of multifocal NSCLC) is better than the survival reported in the series that formed the foundation for these staging changes. These data support complete surgical resection of multifocal lung tumors in patients with node-negative NSCLC.

Problems related to TNM staging: patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Many reports have raised certain problems concerning the current TNM classification of lung cancer, namely that there is no sufficient difference in prognosis between patients with pathologic stage IIIA and IIIB disease. For clarifying this problem, the present study was constructed in light of T3 and T4 classifications.

METHODS

Among 429 patients with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent resection, those with stage IIIA (n = 73) and stage IIIB (n = 79) disease were enrolled in this study, and their prognostic factors were compared.

RESULTS

No difference in the survivals between patients with T3 and T4 disease was observed, and this seemed to affect the prognoses of patients with stage IIIA and IIIB disease. However, when those with T3 and T4 disease were classified into different groups on the basis of TNM descriptors, differences in the survivals became evident. The T3 bronchial invasion group showed a better prognosis than the T3 extrapulmonary invasion group. The T4 tracheal invasion group and T4 pulmonary metastasis group showed a significantly better prognosis than that in the T4 extrapulmonary invasion group and the T4 malignant pleural exudate group. The surgical curativity of patients with T3 disease was evaluated as curative resection or noncurative resection, and the surgical curativity of T4 was evaluated as R0 resection or R1 or R2 resection. The T3 bronchial invasion group included more curative resection cases. The T4 tracheal invasion group and T4 pulmonary metastasis group included more R0 resection cases. Furthermore, when patients with T3 to T2 bronchial invasion and patients with T4 tracheal invasion and T4 pulmonary metastasis were reclassified as having T3 disease, the survivals of the patients reclassified as having T3 and T4 disease, as well as the resultant subsets having stage IIIA and IIIB disease, were significantly different.

CONCLUSION

Tumor status should be reviewed by taking into account the surgical curativity.

Radical resections for T4 lung cancer

T4 lung cancers are a heterogeneous group of locally advanced lung cancers. Treatment is palliative for the majority of patients, ranging from supportive care to chemoradiotherapy. In certain patients, however, surgery is beneficial and may be curative. Patients with T4N0M0 cancers invading the distal trachea, carina, left atrium, aorta, superior vena cava, or vertebral bodies may be surgical candidates. Radical resections of these T4 lung cancers have potential for cure if no mediastinal lymph node metastases (N2 or N3) occur and if resection is complete. Increased postoperative mortality exists and extends beyond 30 days, as evidenced by a 30-day mortality of 8% and a 90-day mortality of 18%. Improved palliation (median survival of 19 months) and cure (31% five-year survival) are possible in patients who meet the criteria, who undergo radical resection, and who are followed by physicians in facilities with special interests in extended resections. The use of induction therapy and surgery in T4 patients may further increase survival and the number of T4 patients in whom radical resection is possible. Radical resections are contraindicated in patients with T4 lung cancers associated with malignant pleural effusions. Unfortunately, these patients have the worst prognosis. If surgical palliation is an option, only pulmonary resection with pleurectomy and not pleuropneumonectomy should be considered. In contrast, lung cancers with the best prognosis are those T4 tumors diagnosed because of a satellite tumor nodule within the same lobe. Because radical resections are usually not required, operative mortality is not increased. Five-year survival in patients with satellite intralobar tumor nodules without mediastinal nodal metastases is comparable to survival of highly selected T4N0M0 patients who undergo radical resection. These two extremes of T4 lung cancers, malignant pleural effusion and satellite intralobar tumor nodules, generally are not considered for or do not require radical resections. It is debatable that the definition of T4 should include these entities.

Staging classification of lung cancer. A critical evaluation

The International System for Staging Lung Cancer has been validated as a prognostic index and questioned regarding the implications of factors that require further study. As technology for evaluating the anatomic extent of disease is increasingly refined, the accuracy of clinical staging is greatly improved and provides a major benefit for individualized treatment selection. Advancing knowledge of the origin and development of lung tumors presents the challenge of appropriate integration of this body of science into clinical practice.

Staging of non-small cell lung cancer: consensus, controversies and challenges

Stage is with performance status, the most potent prognostic factor in non-small cell lung cancer. In the past decades, much effort has been directed towards the definition, description, development and implementation of staging guidelines. This has undoubtedly resulted in improvements in therapy and insight in the biology of the disease. The new millennium sees us confronted with an increasing epidemic of lung cancer. Hence, the need for further improvements in staging accuracy and cost effectiveness, in order to use the available therapeutic armament at its best and provide the patient with a treatment that is best adjusted to his or her condition. Current controversies and future challenges in staging will be addressed.

Practical approach to patients presenting with multiple synchronous suspect lung lesions: a reflection on the current TNM classification based on 54 cases with complete follow-up

OBJECTIVES

To examine the survival after surgical treatment of patients presenting with two synchronous suspect lung lesions, and to reflect on the recent TNM classification, which has upgraded patients with two malignant lung lesions of the same histology into the T4 (both lesions in the same ipsilateral lobe) or M1 (different lobes or lungs) category.

METHODS

Retrieval of all consecutive patients with a diagnosis of two synchronous suspect lung lesions in the prospective database of the Leuven Lung Cancer Group in the interval between 1990 and 1994. Analysis of characteristics and survival of all patients, who underwent surgical resection with intention to cure for both lesions.

RESULTS

Forty-eight of 54 patients had surgical resection with curative intent. Thirty-five of these proved to have two malignant lesions, in 13 the second lesion was benign. The 5-year survival rate in the patients with two malignant lesions was 33% (95% CI: 17-49). The median survival time was 28 months. Although the number of patients in the subgroups was small, there were no obvious differences between patients with two lesions in the same or in different lobes, if a complete resection could be achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

An aggressive surgical approach in carefully selected patients presenting with two suspect pulmonary lesions can be rewarding. Although some degree of upstaging is appropriate in patients with two malignant lung tumours of the same histology, their current stage IIIB or IV classification probably underestimates their prospects for long-term survival after radical resection.

Intrapulmonary metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer: a prognostic assessment

OBJECTIVE

According to the revised TNM classification in 1997, intrapulmonary metastasis within the same lobe of the primary tumor is designated as T4 and intrapulmonary metastasis in a different lobe is M1. However, their prognostic implications remain unclear. To assess their prognoses, we retrospectively analyzed the postoperative survival of patients with and without intrapulmonary metastasis.

METHODS

From January 1982 to December 1996, 2340 patients with non-small cell lung cancer underwent surgical resection. The survival of patients having complete resection (n = 1534) was analyzed according to their intrapulmonary metastasis status: patients without intrapulmonary metastasis (n = 1393), those with metastasis in the same lobe (n = 105), and those with metastasis in a different lobe (n = 18). For comparison, patients with T4 disease without intrapulmonary metastasis in the same lobe (n = 54) and those with M1 disease without metastasis in a different lobe (distant M1, n = 18) were also analyzed.

RESULTS

The overall 5-year survivals were as follows: no intrapulmonary metastasis, 60%; stage T4 disease with no intrapulmonary metastasis, 34%; pulmonary metastasis in the same lobe, 34%; pulmonary metastasis in a different lobe, 11%; and distant M1, 6%. The differences in survival between patients with no pulmonary metastasis and those with metastasis in the same lobe (P <.001, log-rank test) and between patients with metastasis in the same lobe and those with distant M1 (P <.001) were significant. In contrast, there was no significant difference between patients with metastasis in the same lobe and those with T4 disease and no intrapulmonary metastasis or between patients with metastasis to a different lobe and those with distant M1.

CONCLUSIONS

Prognostically, intrapulmonary metastasis within the same lobe of the primary tumor was comparable with T4 and that in a different lobe was comparable with M1. In terms of postoperative prognosis, the revised TNM classification for intrapulmonary metastasis seems to be appropriate.

Prognosis and survival after resection for bronchogenic carcinoma based on the 1997 TNM-staging classification: the Japanese experience

BACKGROUND

A new TNM staging system was proposed, and the previous system was revised in 1997.

METHODS

To evaluate the new TNM staging system for lung cancer, records of 3,043 lung cancer patients who underwent pulmonary resection at the National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, were analyzed.

RESULTS

With regard to clinical stages, 3 patients had occult carcinoma; 786 patients had stage IA disease; 759 patients, stage IB; 54 patients, stage IIA; 469 patients, stage IIB; 582 patients, stage IIIA; 211 patients, stage IIIB; and 179 patients, stage IV. The 5-year survival rates for the respective stages were 70.8% for stage IA, 44.0% for stage IB, 41.1% for stage IIA, 36.9% for stage IIB, 22.7% for stage IIIA, 20.1% for stage IIIB, and 21.6% for stage IV. In terms of postoperative stages, 7 patients were classified in stage 0, 610 in stage IA, 506 in stage IB, 114 in stage IIA, 432 in stage IIB, 702 in stage IIIA, 448 in stage IIIB, and 224 in stage IV. The 5-year survival rates were as follows: stage IA, 79.0%; stage IB, 59.7%; stage IIA, 56.9%; stage IIB, 45.0%; stage IIIA, 23.6%; stage IIIB, 16.5%; and stage IV, 5.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

In the clinical stage, there were significant prognostic differences between stage IA and stage IB, stage IIB and IIIA, and stage IIIA and stage IIIB, but there was no significant difference in 5-year survival rates between stage IB and stage IIA, stage IIA, and IIB, and stage IIIB and stage IV. In the postoperative stage, there were significant differences in 5-year survival rates between each stage except for stage IB and stage IIA.

Survival in synchronous vs. single lung cancer: upstaging better reflects prognosis

OBJECTIVE

To define prognostic parameters for patients with synchronous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

DESIGN

Retrospective study of period from 1970 through 1997.

PATIENTS

Patients with a single (n = 2,764) and synchronous NSCLC (n = 85) who underwent pulmonary resection.

METHODS

All tumors were classified postsurgically, and the tumors of the patients with synchronous lung cancer were staged separately. The most advanced tumor was used for comparison. Actuarial survival time was estimated, and risk factors influencing survival were evaluated. Patients who died within 30 days of surgery were excluded.

MEASUREMENT AND RESULTS

Five-year survival for single NSCLC was 41% and for synchronous lung cancer it was 19%. The relative risk of death for patients with synchronous lung cancer was 1.75, compared to that for patients with single lung cancer. The most advanced tumor in synchronous cancer was a significant predictor of survival (p<0.005). The survival of patients with synchronous lung cancer in which the most advanced tumors were stage I (n = 40) and stage II (n = 27) was not different from that of patients with stage II (n = 834) and stage IIIA (n = 405) single lung cancer, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The poorer survival of patients with synchronous NSCLC is confirmed and quantified. The stage of the most advanced tumor was the best predictor of prognosis. The prognosis of patients with synchronous NSCLC resembles the prognosis of patients with a single lung cancer of a higher stage. Upstaging in synchronous lung cancer is recommended on the basis of these observations.

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Ipsilateral Intrapulmonary Metastasis

From 1981 through 1997, lobectomy or pneumonectomy with mediastinal lymph node dissection was performed in 604 patients with non-small cell lung cancer, of whom 42 (7%) were diagnosed as having ipsilateral pulmonary metastasis. There were 23 males and 19 females, the mean age was 66 years. Lobectomy was carried out in 37 cases and pneumonectomy in 5. Postoperative histology identified 29 adenocarcinomas, 11 squamous cell carcinomas, 1 large cell carcinoma, and 1 adenosquamous cell carcinoma. Two cases were classified as pathologic stage I, 1 as stage II, 26 as IIIA, and 13 as IIIB. Blood vessel invasion was present in 33 cases and absent in 2 cases. Five and 10-year survival rates were 34.3% and 17.1%, respectively. Patients with pulmonary metastasis had a poorer prognosis than those without metastasis; there were local recurrences in 6 patients, distant metastases in 9, and 15 deaths. There were no significant differences in recurrence sites between patients with and without pulmonary metastasis. Multivariate analysis showed that lymph node involvement and blood vessel invasion were useful prognostic factors. Ipsilateral pulmonary metastasis in the same lobe was regarded as local invasion for which surgical resection is the optimal treatment.

The clinicopathological significance of preoperative serum-soluble interleukin-2 receptor concentrations in operable non-small-cell lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Serum-soluble interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R) concentrations have been found to be elevated in cancer patients. However, the importance of this finding in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been previously established.

METHODS

Preoperative serum-soluble IL-2R concentrations were determined in 65 consecutive patients with operable NSCLC. The correlation of preoperative serum-soluble IL-2R concentrations with various clinicopathological features of this cancer was evaluated to clarify the clinical significance of this parameter.

RESULTS

Although serum-soluble IL-2R concentrations were not significantly higher in operable NSCLC patients than in normal controls (P = .1180), serum-soluble IL-2R concentrations were significantly higher in patients with stage IIIB or IV disease than in normal controls (P = .0001). The presence of intrapulmonary metastasis was the only clinicopathological feature that was significantly correlated to serum-soluble IL-2R concentration (P = .0004). The sensitivity of serum-soluble IL-2R concentration in identifying the presence of intrapulmonary metastasis was 87.5%; specificity was 75%.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated preoperative serum-soluble IL-2R concentrations in patients with operable NSCLC reflect the occurrence of intrapulmonary metastasis. Preoperative examination of serum-soluble IL-2R concentrations may be valuable in the detection of the intrapulmonary metastasis preoperatively.

Clinical and surgical staging of non-small cell lung cancer

The necessity for a compulsive attitude toward preoperative assessment of lung cancer is to be emphasized, since rational treatment and prognosis depend largely on the stage of disease at the time of diagnosis. In the preoperative setting, the techniques used should be sequential, logical, and help to identify patients suitable for treatment with curative intent. With regard to the primary tumor (T status), the accuracy of CT or MRI to predict the need for extended resections is limited. Similarly, all noninvasive methods to determine the nodal status (N) are valuable, but mediastinoscopy has a greater sensitivity and specificity than either CT or MRI. The role of routine organ screening for the detection of distant occult metastasis in the asymptomatic patient is still controversial. Ultimately, the prognosis of the resected patient with lung cancer is based on complete intraoperative staging, which can be done by either systematic node sampling or complete lymphadenectomy. At present, neither of these techniques has been shown to improve the quality of staging or survival.

Surgical therapy of early non-small cell lung cancer

Approximately 45% of all lung carcinomas are limited to the chest, where surgical resection is not only an important therapeutic modality, but in many cases, the most effective method of controlling the disease. Patients with T1N0 and T2N0 tumors have early lung cancer, and most are curable by resection, with 5-year survival rates in the range of 75 to 80% for patients with T1N0 status. Patients with smaller tumors do better than patients with larger ones, while visceral pleural invasion does not seem to influence survival. Histologic type is also a significant prognostic variable, with squamous tumors having a better prognosis than tumors of nonsquamous histology. Other known prognostic factors are age and gender of the patient and completeness of resection. The "gold standard" of surgery remains lobectomy, regardless of tumor size at presentation. Stage T1N1 and T2N1 carcinomas represent a group of patients where the disease involves hilar and bronchopulmonary nodes. This group is best treated by complete resection with mediastinal lymphadenectomy. Tumor size and histology are significant prognostic variables, and 5-year survival after complete resection is in the range of 40 to 50%. Postoperative radiation therapy may improve local control, while chemotherapy results in a slightly reduced risk of death.

Evaluation of TMN classification for lung carcinoma with ipsilateral intrapulmonary metastasis

BACKGROUND

Staging for lung cancer based on the TNM classification is an important predictive factor for prognosis. Recently, lung cancer with ipsilateral intrapulmonary metastasis (PM) was reclassified according to the revision of the TNM classification. To evaluate the prognostic importance of the new staging system for PM, we analyzed the postoperative survival of patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma.

METHODS

Of 1,002 consecutive patients who underwent operation for primary lung cancer between June 1984 and December 1996, we reviewed the medical record of 889 patients who underwent complete resection for non-small cell lung cancer.

RESULTS

We considered 89 patients (10.0%) to have synchronous ipsilateral PM. After reclassification to the former staging system revised in 1992, 5 patients were classified as stage I, 29 as stage IIIA, 48 as stage IIIB, and 7 as stage IV. In the new staging system revised in 1997, 48 patients were recategorized as stage IIIB, and 41 as stage IV. The 5-year survival of patients without PM (49.5%) was significantly better than that of patients with PM in primary-tumor lobe (29.6%, p = 0.002) or in nonprimary-tumor ipsilateral lobe (23.4%, p = 0.0002). Although the survival of patients with stage IV cancer without PM was significantly worse than that of patients with the new (1997) stage IV cancer with PM (p = 0.02), it was similar to that of patients with the former (1992) stage IV cancer with PM. The survival of PM patients with N0 or N1 disease was significantly better than that of PM patients with N2 or N3 disease (p = 0.001). Furthermore, in patients with the new (1997) stage IIIB cancer, the survival of N0 disease was better than that of N2 disease (p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Inasmuch as the prognosis of non-small cell carcinoma in patients with PM strongly correlated with N factor rather than PM factor, N factor should be reflected in a staging designation. We therefore consider the new TNM classification for PM reclassified in 1997 to be less acceptable for surgical-pathologic staging than the revision in 1992.

Factors influencing ten-year survival in resected stages I to IIIa non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine (in survivors of 5 years after resection of their lung cancer) whether age, sex, histologic condition, and age have any influence on furthering survival beyond 5 years.

METHODS

From 1973 to 1989, 686 patients were alive and well 5 years after complete resection of their lung cancers. Survival analysis was carried out with only deaths from lung cancer treated as deaths. Deaths from other causes were treated as withdrawals. Multivariate Cox regression was used to test the relationship of survival to age, sex, histologic condition, and stage.

RESULTS

The population in this study had the following characteristics at the time of operation: The male/female ratio was 1.38:1, and the median age was 61 years. The histologic condition of their lung cancer was adenocarcinoma in 412 patients, squamous cell in 244 patients, large cell carcinoma in 29 patients, and small cell carcinoma in 1 patient. The stage of the disease was stage IA in 263 patients, IB in 261 patients, IIA in 12 patients, IIB in 68 patients, and IIIA in 82 patients. The extent of resection was a lobectomy or bilobectomy in 579 patients, pneumonectomy in 55 patients, and wedge resection or segmentectomy in 52 patients. A recurrence or a new lung primary occurrence was considered as failure to remain free of lung cancer. The median follow-up on all patients was 122 months from initial treatment. Of the 686 patients, 26 patients experienced the development of late recurrence and 36 new cancers, beyond 5 years. Overall survival for 5 additional years after a 5-year check point was 92.4%. Likewise, survival by nodal status was 93% for N0 tumors, 95% for N1 tumors, and 90% for N2 tumors. Survival by stage was 93% for stage I tumors and 91% for stage II or IIIA tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with surgically treated lung cancer, neither age, sex, histologic condition, nor stage is a predictor of the risk of late recurrence or new lung cancer. The only prognostic factor appears to be the survival of the patient free of lung cancer for 5 years from the initial treatment, with a resultant favorable outlook to remain well for 10 or more years.

The 1997 International Staging System for non-small cell lung cancer: have all the issues been addressed?

The International Staging System for Lung Cancer has been revised recently. Important changes have been made to allow better correlation of prognoses and direction of management. The classification of synchronous pulmonary nodules in the same lobe as the primary tumor as T4 stage IIIB may imply a poorer outcome than is warranted, while the designation of a similar stage for malignant pleural effusion may not be reflective of the very poor prognosis associated with this extent of disease.

Intrapulmonary metastasis of lung cancer: soft x-ray investigation of inflated and fixed lung

BACKGROUND

Intrapulmonary metastasis (IPM) of lung cancer is thought to be an important factor influencing patient prognosis. It is not easy to detect a small IPM by preoperative examination and sometimes even by postoperative pathologic investigation. We applied soft x-ray investigation to inflated and fixed lungs for the detection of IPM.

STUDY DESIGN

From 1990 to 1992, 75 patients with lung cancer who had no metastatic lesions on preoperative whole CT, MRI, and technetium-99m bone scintigram examinations underwent lung resection. The resected lungs were fixed in an inflated condition, sliced at the corresponding CT levels into 10-mm-thick sections, and submitted for soft x-ray examination. When an accessory nodular shadow(s) was detected on the soft x-ray images, the size of the nodule and its distance from the primary tumor were measured.

RESULTS

In 23 of the 75 patients, accessory nodular shadows were detected on the soft x-ray images. Six nodules in 6 patients proved to be IPM, 2 of which were also detected by postoperative macroscopic examination. Another 2 microscopic IPM were found only by postoperative pathologic examination. The total detection rate of IPM was 10.7% (8 of 75 patients) in this series. The detection rate of IPM at our institute was 5.4% before this study (1979 to 1989). The mean diameter of the IPM detected by the soft x-ray method was 2.8 +/- 1.5 mm, and this was significantly smaller than that of the macroscopically detected nodules (7.2 +/- 3.2 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that soft x-ray investigation is an effective procedure to detect relatively small intrapulmonary metastatic nodules and will contribute to precise postoperative staging of patients with lung cancer.