Surgery and chemotherapy

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was tested in non-small cell lung cancer in an attempt to increase the resectability of the tumor and to treat the microscopic metastatic disease known to be responsible for the majority of failures in surgically treated patients. This review deals with published trials. Most of them are feasibility studies in Stage III NSCLC. Obviously, the heterogeneity of eligibility criteria from one study to another prevents general conclusions on the usefulness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, it is possible to conclude that neoadjuvant chemotherapy has an antitumor activity; the majority of the studies report a 60% objective response rate including a significant number of complete responses and a 50% complete resection rate. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not increase morbidity after surgery except when it is combined with preoperative radiation therapy. At the time of writing, one Phase III randomized study comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery with surgery alone has been published. This study concludes that the combined modality treatment improves the survival of patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Taken as a whole, the literature deserves further studies to determine the place of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in lung cancer.

Is there a role for vindesine in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer?

Vindesine is a semisynthetic derivative of vinblastine which has been evaluated in clinical studies since the late 1970's. The literature on vindesine in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer has been reviewed and all aspects of vindesine treatment in this disease has been covered. It is concluded that vindesine as a single agent yields a response rate of 18% based on the treatment of 295 patients included in phase II trials (95% confidence limits 13%-22%). No difference was observed among the three major histologic types of non-small cell lung cancer. In phase III trials, the response rate and confidence limits are at a similar level. Combination chemotherapy including vindesine plus cisplatin ranks among the most active treatments in non-small cell lung cancer and is as active as etoposide plus cisplatin, both with respect to response rate and survival. It has not been documented that the addition of one or two other drugs to the combination of vindesine yields an increase in survival. When best supportive care was compared with a combination of vindesine plus cisplatin, the group with chemotherapy was attributed a survival advantage in all three studies published, and the difference was statistically significant in two of these three studies. Thus, vindesine has a well documented activity in non-small cell lung cancer and ranks among the most active single agents in this disease. Vindesine is also part of several active combination chemotherapies among which the combination of vindesine plus cisplatin is particularly interesting, because it has been repeatedly shown to prolong survival as compared to supportive care. Especially this latter point leads to the conclusion that there is a role for vindesine in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. However, the concept of chemotherapy in this disease remains investigational even though the advances seen in recent years clearly merit further studies.

Critical analysis of neoadjuvant therapy for Stage IIIa non-small cell lung cancer [corrected]

Lung cancer is the major cause of cancer mortality. Locally advanced (Stage III) disease constitutes 30 to 40% of the entire group of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Surgical resection offers the best opportunity for cure, but resection of disease is possible in only a minority of patients with Stage IIIa disease. Even among patients who have "successful" surgery systemic relapse is common, and the 5-yr survival after complete resection is only 30%. Preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy is under investigation in an attempt to improve the bleak outcome of patients with Stage IIIa NSCLC. Preliminary trials have shown that this approach is feasible: neoadjuvant treatment can be administered with moderate toxicity and in most cases without compromising the possibility for surgical resection. In some instances, neoadjuvant treatment has produced pathologic complete responses, and in others it has decreased tumor bulk so that inoperable patients became surgical candidates. Whether this latter phenomenon has an impact on survival is unknown. Therefore, the role of neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced lung cancer will not be known until properly designed randomized trials are conducted.

Preoperative chemotherapy and irradiation for stage III non-small cell lung cancer

Surgical therapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not resulted in substantial long-term survival. Neoadjuvant treatment programs that could down-stage the tumor and achieve increased long-term survival would be of obvious benefit. We have used preoperative simultaneous chemotherapy and irradiation in 85 patients with clinical stage III non-small cell lung cancer considered candidates for surgical resection. One group of 56 patients was treated with cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and simultaneous irradiation for five days every other week for a total of four cycles. After treatment, 39 patients underwent resection, and the operative mortality was 2 (5%) of 39. A second trial was undertaken in which etoposide (VP-16) was added because of its synergism with cisplatin. In this group, 29 patients were considered to have potentially resectable disease, and 23 underwent thoracotomy with 1 operative death (4%). Of the total of 62 patients having thoracotomy, 60 underwent resection (97%). Complications were major, and there were four bronchopleural fistulas. For the 85 patients eligible for surgical intervention in these two groups of patients, the Kaplan-Meier median survival estimate is 40% at 3 years. The median survival of the 62 patients having thoracotomy is 36.6 months. Combination preoperative chemotherapy and irradiation is feasible with acceptable toxicity and operative mortality in patients with clinical stage III non-small cell lung cancer. Prospective randomized studies are suggested for further evaluation of this treatment program.

Importance of biologic status to the postoperative prognosis of patients with stage III nonsmall cell lung cancer

The prognosis of patients with stage III nonsmall cell lung cancer was studied, with special attention to their biologic status prior to lung resection. The biologic status was estimated from the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio in the peripheral blood, serum albumin level, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Among 46 patients who underwent potentially curative operations, 31 cases of biologic status A or B (more than two parameters normal) revealed 37.6% of a 5-year survival rate, whereas there was no 5-year survivor in 15 cases of biologic status C or D (more than two parameters abnormal). Of the 5-year survival rate in T3N0 disease of biologic status A or B, the 60% surviving (of 10 cases) was in marked contrast to the same stage disease of biologic status C or D where only 1 patient (of 10 cases) was still surviving at more than 30 months. In 30 patients with T3N0, T3N1, and T2N2 diseases of biologic status A or B, where long-term survivors were derived, the 5-year survival rate in 30 patients of biologic status A or B was 36.6% in contrast to no long-term survivor in the same stage diseases of biologic status C or D (n = 25). We conclude that surgical results in stage III nonsmall cell lung cancer will be beneficial in patients of biologic status A or B, but nonbeneficial in patients with the same stage of biologic status C or D.