Routine template bleeding time determinations before cardiac procedures

Prolonged exposure to inhaled nitric oxide does not affect haemostasis in piglets

OBJECTIVE

To examine possible adverse effects on haemostasis from prolonged exposure to inhaled nitric oxide (iNO).

DESIGN AND SETTING

Blinded, randomised, experimental animal study in a university animal laboratory.

INTERVENTIONS

Anaesthetised and intubated piglets received central venous, arterial, and transabdominal urinary catheters. Twelve piglets were studied with triggered pressure support ventilation breathing with an air-oxygen mixture for 30 h with nitric oxide (NO), 40 parts per million (ppm) (n = 6) or without NO gas (n = 6) added. The tests of platelet function were assessed in a separate 1-h experiment in which 12 additional animals were blindly randomised to receive intravenous acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) (n = 7) or placebo (n = 5).

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

All 12 animals were clinically stable during the study period of 30 h. Haemostasis was assessed in terms of bleeding time and platelet function by Adeplat-S, reflecting platelet adhesion. Prothrombin fragment 1 + 2, fibrin D-dimer, tissue plasminogen activator and prothrombin complex were measured to investigate whether inhaled NO (iNO) had any effects on thrombin formation, fibrin formation, fibrinolysis or coagulation. All parameters including bleeding time and Adeplat-S were unaffected by iNO. ASA significantly increased bleeding time, but did not affect Adeplat-S. Nitrate in plasma and NOx (nitrate and nitrite) in urine increased significantly in pigs receiving iNO compared with controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged exposure to iNO at 40[Symbol: see text]ppm did not affect bleeding time or coagulation parameters in healthy piglets. The findings do not support the hypothesis that iNO increases the risk of bleeding in humans.

Preoperative hemostatic activity and excessive bleeding after cardiopulmonary bypass

The rationale for predicting the risk of excessive postoperative bleeding by assessing the hemostatic status of a patient before cardiopulmonary bypass was investigated. A novel, rapid, overall test (hemostatometry) consisting of a physiologically relevant test of platelet function (shear-induced hemostasis) and coagulation was performed using nonanticoagulated blood and compared with the routine coagulation screen. Two hundred five patients undergoing elective coronary revascularization were studied 3 to 4 days before operation. Forty-nine bled excessively for nonsurgical reasons; none were predicted by the routine coagulation tests. Using a stepwise discriminant analysis, hemostatometry correctly predicted 31 of 49 (63%). Thirty of 156 predicted as bleeders by hemostatometry did not bleed. Thus, preoperative hemostatometry predicted 77% of the true outcome. The false predictions suggest, however, that certain bleeding abnormalities probably acquired during cardiopulmonary bypass cannot be predicted. These findings do not justify the routine use of preoperative tests in assessing the bleeding risk in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass.

The bleeding time: its potential utility among patients receiving thrombolytic therapy

The BT as a test of hemostatic function was first described 80 years ago. It has generally been considered a primitive and tedious test. Improvements in technique and standardization have increased the BT's reliability and led to its consideration as a preoperative screening measure. Current use has not been widespread, however, except for patients undergoing neurosurgery and organ biopsy. Recently, though, there has been a renewed interest in the BT for patients receiving thrombolytic therapy because levels of fibrinogen and fibrin(ogen) degradation products have been only weak predictors of hemorrhagic complications. The rationale for using the BT in this setting is that thrombolysis appears to impair platelet function, either through depletion of platelet granules or through direct proteolytic actions on platelets. Further research will determine whether these platelet effects are manifest as BT prolongation; whether increased BT will correlate with hemorrhagic complications; and, finally, whether patients who fail to achieve clot lysis or those at risk for bleeding can be identified prospectively.

Preoperative aspirin ingestion increases operative blood loss after coronary artery bypass grafting

Thirty-four patients were entered into a non-blinded, randomized study to test the effect of preoperative aspirin ingestion on postoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements after coronary artery bypass grafting. Sixteen patients in the aspirin-treated group had significantly increased chest-tube blood loss 12 hours after operation (1,513 +/- 978 versus 916 +/- 482 ml; p = 0.038). In addition, aspirin users had significantly increased requirements for postoperative packed red blood cells (4.4 +/- 3.5 versus 1.8 +/- 1.3 units; p = 0.014), platelets (1.3 +/- 1.3 versus 0.2 +/- 0.4 six-donor units, p = 0.0049), and fresh-frozen plasma (3.6 +/- 5.0 versus 0.78 +/- 1.6 units; p = 0.042) transfusions. The only patients requiring reoperation for bleeding were in the aspirin-treated group (2 patients). Six patients were not entered into the randomized part of the study because of excessively prolonged post-aspirin bleeding times (greater than 10 minutes). This finding suggests that a subset of patients are particularly sensitive to aspirin and have significantly prolonged bleeding times after aspirin ingestion. We conclude that aspirin ingestion increases postoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements, and we recommend discontinuation of aspirin therapy before cardiac procedures.