Quantitative assessment of mechanical energy in pulsatile blood flow during cardiopulmonary bypass

Augmentation of Abdominal Organ Perfusion during Cardiopulmonary Bypass with a Novel Intra-aortic Pulsatile Catheter Pump

Background

Current pulsatile pumps for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) are far from satisfactory because of the poor pulsatility. This study was undertaken to examine the efficiency of a novel pulsatile catheter pump on pulsatility and its effect on abdominal organ perfusion during CPB.

Methods

Twelve pigs weighing 89±11 kg were randomly divided into a pulsatile group (n=6) and a non-pulsatile group (n=6). All animals had a CPB for 120 min, aorta clamped for 60 min, temperature down to 32°C, and a perfusion flow of 60 ml/kg/min. In the pulsatile group, a 21 Fr intra-aortic pulsatile catheter, which was connected to a 40 mL membrane pump, was placed in the descending aorta and activated by a balloon pump driver during the first 90 minutes of CPB until aortic declamping. Hemodynamics, organ blood flow, body metabolism, and blood trauma were studied during experiments.

Results

Compared with the non-pulsatile group during CPB, the pulsatile group had a higher systolic blood pressure (P&0.01), higher mean arterial pressure (P&0.05), and higher blood flow to the superior mesenteric artery (P&0.05). The hemodynamic energy, indicated by the energy equivalent pressure (EEP) was higher in the gastrointestinal tract and kidney in the pulsatile group (P&0.01, P&0.01). Abdominal organ perfusion status, as indicated by SvO2 in the inferior vena cava, was higher in the pulsatile group (P&0.05) 30 min after cessation of CPB. Hemolysis indicated by release of free hemoglobin during CPB was similar in the two groups.

Conclusion

Applying the pulsatile catheter pump in the descending aorta is effective in supplying the pulsatile flow to the abdominal organs and results in improved abdominal organ perfusion during the ischemic phase of CPB.

Clinical effectiveness of centrifugal pump to produce pulsatile flow during cardiopulmonary bypass in patients undergoing cardiac surgery

Although the centrifugal pump has been widely used as a nonpulsatile pump for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), little is known about its performance as a pulsatile pump for CPB, especially on its efficacy in producing hemodynamic energy and its clinical effectiveness. We performed a study to evaluate whether the Rotaflow centrifugal pump produces effective pulsatile flow during CPB and whether the pulsatile flow in this setting is clinically effective in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Thirty-two patients undergoing CPB for elective coronary artery bypass grafting were randomly allocated to a pulsatile perfusion group (n = 16) or a nonpulsatile perfusion group (n = 16). All patients were perfused with the Rotaflow centrifugal pump. In the pulsatile group, the centrifugal pump was adjusted to the pulsatile mode (60 cycles/min) during aortic cross-clamping, whereas in the nonpulsatile group, the pump was kept in its nonpulsatile mode during the same period of time. Compared with the nonpulsatile group, the pulsatile group had a higher pulse pressure (P < 0.01) and a fraction higher energy equivalent pressure (EEP, P = 0.058). The net gain of pulsatile flow, represented by the surplus hemodynamic energy (SHE), was found much higher in the CPB circuit than in patients (P < 0.01). Clinically, there was no difference between the pulsatile and nonpulsatile groups with regard to postoperative acute kidney injury, endothelial activation, or inflammatory response. Postoperative organ function and the duration of hospital stay were similar in the two patient groups. In conclusion, pulsatile CPB with the Rotaflow centrifugal pump is associated with a small gain of EEP and SHE, which does not seem to be clinically effective in adult cardiac surgical patients.

Gastrointestinal Motility During Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Sonomicrometric Study

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is known to impair the integrity of the gastrointestinal tract. However, little is known about the movement behavior of the gastrointestinal tract during CPB. This study was aimed to assess the gastrointestinal motility with sonomicrometry, a distance measurement using ultrasound, in a porcine model of CPB. Twelve pigs weighing 70-112 kg were having a standard hypothermic CPB for 120 min either with the nonpulsatile flow (n = 6) or the pulsatile flow (n = 6). Before CPB, piezoelectric echo crystals were placed either along the longitudinal or the circular axis of the pylorus. Patterns of gut movement and the total sonomicrometric activity (TSA) were recorded at several time intervals during experiments as qualitative and quantitative parameters of gut motility. Results showed that the intact regular rhythmic pattern of gut movement was detected before CPB. This pattern changed little when CPB started, but it disappeared at 60 min when the body temperature lowered down to 32 degrees Celsius. During the same period, the TSA reduced significantly along the longitudinal as well as the circular directions of the pylorus. There was no significant difference between the nonpulsatile and pulsatile groups. Gut blood flow reduced significantly in both groups, but it was not associated with the reduced sonomicrometric activity. In conclusion, gastrointestinal motility during CPB can be measured qualitatively and quantitatively by sonomicrometry in a large animal model. Suppression of gut motility during CPB does not seem to be associated with the mode of perfusion but with the reduced body temperature during the hypothermic phase of CPB.

Cardiopulmonary bypass for adult patients: a survey of equipment and techniques

OBJECTIVES

The techniques and equipment used for cardiopulmonary bypass for adult cardiac surgery vary among institutions and may change over time. This study sought to document the changing patterns of practice.

DESIGN

Voluntary survey of meeting participants.

SETTING

13th Annual San Diego Cardiothoracic Surgery Symposium (February 1993).

PARTICIPANTS

There were 331 responses from perfusionists (79.5%), cardiac surgeons (11.2%), and anesthesiologists (6.3%). The majority of these participants were from institutions where more than 1,000 cardiac operations were performed annually.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

It was found that 91.5% of the respondents used membrane oxygenators currently, compared with 5% in 1982 (as reported in a previous survey). Over 80% of the institutions surveyed used some type of perioperative cell-salvaging technique. Arterial line filters were used by 92% of the respondents compared with 64% in 1982. Also, 80% of the respondents were aware of the availability of leukocyte-depleting filters.

CONCLUSIONS

The probable reasons for the increased utilization of membrane oxygenators and arterial line filters include less damage to the formed elements of blood, fewer gaseous microemboli, and better control of carbon dioxide elimination and oxygenation. The authors anticipate that future surveys will document increased use of leukocyte-depleting filters because of the literature implicating neutrophils as mediators of tissue destruction in various disease processes, including myocardial reperfusion injury.