Doppler echocardiography evaluation of the CarboMedics valve in patients with small aortic anulus and valve prosthesis–body surface area mismatch

Managing the challenge of a small aortic annulus in patients with severe aortic stenosis

INTRODUCTION

Small aortic annulus (SAA) poses a challenge in the management of patients with severe aortic stenosis requiring aortic valve replacement - both surgical and transcatheter - since it has been associated with worse clinical outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to comprehensively summarize the available evidence regarding the management of aortic stenosis in patients with SAA and discuss the current controversies as well as future perspectives in this field.

EXPERT OPINION

It is paramount to agree in a common definition for diagnosing and properly treating SAA patients, and for that purpose, multidetector computer tomography is essential. The results of recent trials led to the expansion of transcatheter aortic valve replacement among patients of all the surgical-risk spectrum, and the choice of treatment (transcatheter, surgical) should be based on patient comorbidities, anatomical characteristics, and patient preferences.

Aortic Valve Replacement without Annular Enlargement in Patients with Small Aortic Roots

Use of small prostheses for aortic valve replacement eliminates the need for annular enlargement but may impair symptomatic resolution and long-term patient survival. We reviewed our experience with 105 consecutive patients who had isolated aortic valve replacement with small mechanical prostheses or bioprostheses (14 to 21 mm) without concurrent annular enlargement between August 1976 and November 1992. The mean age was 72 ± 10 years and 82% of patients were female. Valvular disease was primarily aortic stenosis in 61%, aortic regurgitation in 7%, and mixed aortic disease was present in 32% of patients. Mean preoperative ejection fraction was 64% ± 17% and the aortic valve area was 0.5 ± 0.2 cm2. Prior to surgery, 82% of patients were in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV. The mean duration of follow-up was 8.1 years. There were 7 early and 14 late deaths giving an overall survival of 80% and a 10-year Kaplan-Meier survival rate of 77%. Five patients developed thromboembolic complications (transient stroke) and 2 required repeat aortic valve replacement due to prosthetic valve endocarditis. Doppler echocardiography or cardiac catheterization was performed in 15 patients postoperatively but peak systolic gradient exceeded 50 mm Hg in only one individual with a 21-mm porcine valve. All surviving patients were in functional class I or II. We conclude that aortic valve replacement with small prostheses is associated with excellent long-term patient survival, improvement in clinical symptoms, and a low incidence of complications.

Diagnostic evaluation of left-sided prosthetic heart valve dysfunction

Prosthetic heart valve (PHV) dysfunction is a rare, but potentially life-threatening, complication. In clinical practice, PHV dysfunction poses a diagnostic dilemma. Echocardiography and fluoroscopy are the imaging techniques of choice and are routinely used in daily practice. However, these techniques sometimes fail to determine the specific cause of PHV dysfunction, which is crucial to the selection of the appropriate treatment strategy. Multidetector-row CT (MDCT) can be of additional value in diagnosing the specific cause of PHV dysfunction and provides valuable complimentary information for surgical planning in case of reoperation. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has limited value in the evaluation of biological PHV dysfunction. In this Review, we discuss the use of established imaging modalities for the detection of left-sided mechanical and biological PHV dysfunction and discuss the complementary role of MDCT in this context.

Evaluation of 17-mm St. Jude Medical Regent prosthetic aortic heart valves by rest and dobutamine stress echocardiography

BACKGROUND

The prosthesis used for aortic valve replacement in patients with small aortic root can be too small in relation to body size, thus showing high transvalvular gradients at rest and/or under stress conditions. This study was carried out to evaluate rest and Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) hemodynamic response of 17-mm St. Jude Medical Regent (SJMR-17 mm) in relatively aged patients at mean 24 months follow-up.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study population consisted of 19 patients (2 men, 17 women, mean age 69.2 +/- 7.3 years). All patients underwent rest Doppler echocardiography before and after surgery and basal and DSE at follow up (infused at rate of 5 microg/Kg/min and increased by 5 microg/Kg/min at 5 min intervals up to 40 microg/Kg/min). The following parameters were evaluated at rest and/or under DSE: heart rate (HR), ejection fraction (EF), cardiac output (CO), peak and mean velocity and pressure gradients (MxV, MnV, MxPG, MnPG), effective orifice area (EOA), indexed EOA (EOAi), left ventricular mass (LVM), indexed LVM (LVMi), Velocity Time Integral at left ventricular outflow tract (VTI LVOT) and transvalvular (Aortic VTI), Doppler velocity index (DVI). At rest MxPG and MnPG were 29.2 +/- 7.1 and 16.6 +/- 5.8 mmHg, respectively; EOA and EOAi resulted 1.14 +/- 0.3 cm(2) and 0.76 +/- 0.2 cm(2)/m(2); DVI was normal (0.50 +/- 0.1). At follow-up LVM and LVMi decreased significantly from pre-operative value of 258 +/- 43 g and 157.4 +/- 27.7 g/m(2) to 191 +/- 23.8 g and 114.5 +/- 10.6 g/m(2), respectively. DSE increased significantly HR, CO, EF, MxGP (up to 83.4 +/- 2 1.9 mmHg), MnPG (up to 43.2 +/- 12.7 mmHg). EOA, EOAi, DVI increased insignificantly (from baseline up to 1.2 +/- 0.4 cm(2), 0.75 +/- 0.3 cm(2)/m(2) and 0.48 +/- 0.1 respectively). Two patients developed significant intraventricular gradients.

CONCLUSION

These data show that SJMR 17-mm prostheses can be safely implanted in aortic position in relatively aged patients, offering a satisfactory hemodynamic performance at rest and under DSE, with full utilization of its available orifice, suggesting that a possible mild prosthesis-patient mismatch is not an issue of clinical relevance when this small prosthesis is used. Rest and Dobutamine stress echocardiography is a useful and effective means for evaluating prosthesis hemodynamics and for monitoring the expected LVH regression.

A randomized comparison of the MCRI On-X and CarboMedics Top Hat bileaflet mechanical replacement aortic valves: Early postoperative hemodynamic function and clinical events

OBJECTIVE

This study compared hemodynamic function and clinical events in consecutive patients randomly assigned to receive a wholly supra-annular replacement valve or a valve with an intra-annular component.

METHODS

Fifty-two patients with an average age of 62 years (range 40-74 years) were sized for both a CarboMedics Top Hat valve (CarboMedics Inc, Austin, Tex) and an MCRI On-X valve (Medical Carbon Research Institute, LLC, Austin, Tex) before random assignment to receive either valve type. Echocardiographic and clinical assessments were performed in the immediate postoperative period and at 1 year.

RESULTS

The mean effective orifice areas were 1.41 +/- 0.42 cm2 for the Top Hat and 2.17 +/- 0.78 cm2 for the On-X (P < .0001). The mean pressure differences were 12.2 +/- 4.4 mm Hg and 6.9 +/- 3.6 mm Hg, respectively (P < .0001). New York Heart Association functional class was better with the On-X than the Top Hat valves, but there were no differences in clinical events, regression of left ventricular mass, or measures of hemolysis.

CONCLUSION

The partially intra-annular MCRI On-X valve was hemodynamically superior to the wholly supra-annular CarboMedics Top Hat valve. However, there were no differences in early clinical outcomes between the two valve types.

Functional Results in Aortic Root Enlargement

BACKGROUND

The hemodynamically efficient valves with effective orifice areas that are used in aortic valve replacement have been positively determined to affect postoperative exercise capacity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional effects of aortic root enlargement in the late postoperative period for patients with a small effective orifice area.

METHODS

Nineteen patients with a small effective orifice area were included in the study. The study group comprised 9 patients who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement with 23-mm St. Jude Medical prosthetic valves and posterior aortic root enlargement. The control group comprised 10 patients in whom 19-mm and 21-mm St. Jude Medical prosthetic valves were implanted without aortic root enlargement. The patients were evaluated in the late postoperative period with echocardiography and cardiopulmonary exercise testing.

RESULTS

The 2 groups were similar in anthropometric parameter values, follow-up periods, echocardiographic findings, and the gradients at the prosthetic aortic valve at rest; however, the anaerobic threshold, peak oxygen uptake, minute ventilation volume, and walk time were significantly higher in the study group ( P <.05).

CONCLUSION

The choice of aortic root enlargement for the implantation of a valve with a larger effective orifice area is preferred by most of the surgeons over the implantation of a valve with a smaller effective orifice area. The late postoperative functional capacity of the patient is significantly improved with root enlargement. Surgeons should be encouraged to perform root enlargement in patients with a small effective orifice area, and such surgery may even be performed routinely in these patients.

Hemodynamic evaluation of normally functioning Sulzer Carbomedics prosthetic valves

The Sulzer Carbomedics prosthetic heart valve (CP) is a commonly used mechanical valve in clinical practice. In the present study, we used conventional and color Doppler echocardiography to assess the hemodynamics of normally functioning CP in the aortic (n = 73) and mitral (n = 127) positions. Our findings demonstrate no significant correlation of Doppler-measured peak and mean pressure gradients and effective orifice area with implanted valve size and actual orifice areas, measured directly by the manufacturer for CPs in both the mitral and aortic positions. However, it is still useful to measure effective orifice area by Doppler because a value in the normal or nonstenotic range points to an unobstructed prosthesis in the aortic or mitral position, in the absence of poor left ventricular ejection fraction. A value in the stenotic range could mean a normally functioning or obstructed prosthesis and, therefore, may need further investigation, such as assessment of valve leaflet motion by transthoracic or transesophageal echocardiography or fluoroscopy. Valve regurgitation as evaluated by color Doppler flow mapping was mild in practically all CPs in the aortic position, and in the majority of CPs in the mitral position.

Transthoracic left ventricular puncture for the assessment of patients with aortic and mitral valve prostheses: the Massachusetts General Hospital experience, 1989-2000

Accurate assessment of suspected prosthetic valve dysfunction is critically important as reoperation carries high risk. Noninvasive methods of hemodynamic assessment of patients with both aortic and mitral mechanical valves continue to be frustrated by the interference created by prosthetic material and direct left ventricular puncture may be required for definitive hemodynamic assessment. We report the hemodynamic and angiographic results and outcomes of 38 consecutive patients with double valve replacement who underwent left ventricular puncture as part of evaluation of possible prosthetic dysfunction. These results were compared with those obtained by noninvasive testing. We found noninvasive assessment alone to be unsatisfactory as measurements of regurgitation and stenosis correlated poorly with those obtained by direct left ventricular puncture. Important information that altered patient management was obtained from invasive assessment in 68% of cases with an acceptable rate of complications. Therefore, hemodynamic and angiographic assessment using transthoracic left ventricular puncture should be entertained in patients with mitral and aortic valve replacement presenting with congestive heart failure and suspected prosthesis dysfunction.

A comparison of the in vivo performance of the 19-mm St. Jude Medical Hemodynamic Plus and 21-mm standard valve

BACKGROUND

In the present study we analyzed the in vivo performance of the 19-mm St. Jude Medical Hemodynamic Plus aortic prosthesis (19HP), evaluated the midterm performance of 19HP in the aortic position, and compared the implantability and hemodynamic characteristics of this valve with those of the 21-mm standard St. Jude Medical valve (21SD) in adult patients with aortic stenosis and a narrowed aortic annulus.

METHODS

From February 1994 to December 1999, 60 patients who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement with either the 19HP (n = 31) or the 21SD (n = 29) were studied. Comparison between the two models included analysis of early and late mortality and morbidity. Pre- and postoperative echocardiography was performed in all patients to evaluate and compare the hemodynamic performance of both prosthetic valves. The postoperative serum lactic dehydrogenase activity was measured in both groups of patients as an indicator of hemolysis.

RESULTS

The mean body surface area was 1.46 +/- 0.16 m2 in the 19HP group and 1.49 +/- 0.13 m2 in the 21SD group (p = 0.1577). Other than female dominance in the 19HP group, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of preoperative variables (age, preoperative pressure gradients, and New York Heart Association functional class). The average postoperative peak pressure gradient was 23.3 +/- 10.5 mm Hg in the 19HP group and 27.9 +/- 9.9 mm Hg in the 21SD group (p = 0.0666). There was no hospital death in either group. Six-year follow-up was completed in both groups of patients. Late death occurred in 1 patient in the 19HP group (1.09% per patient-year). Actuarial survival at 6 years was 92.3% +/- 7.4% in the 19HP group, and 100% in the 21SD group (p = 0.33). The linearized complication rate was 1.09% per patient-year and 1.02% per patient-year for thromboembolism, and 1.09% per patient-year and 1.02% per patient-year for anticoagulant-related hemorrhage in the 19HP group and the 21SD group, respectively. Freedom from all complications at 6 years did not show any significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.54). Although left ventricular mass indices decreased significantly after aortic valve replacement in both groups (19HP group, p = 0.0002; 21SD group, p = 0.0006), there were no significant differences in the two indices between the groups after aortic valve replacement (p = 0.999). There was no significant difference in the lactic dehydrogenase level between the two groups (p = 0.4915).

CONCLUSIONS

In vivo hemodynamic performance of the 19HP valve as well as the early and intermediate clinical outcome up to 6 years was satisfactory and corresponded closely to that of the 21SD valve in adult patients. The 19-mm Hemodynamic Plus model can be recommended in patients with a measured 19-mm annulus and this valve will minimize the need for the aortic annular enlargement procedure.

Clinical evaluation of St Jude Medical Hemodynamic Plus versus standard aortic valve prostheses: The Italian multicenter, prospective, randomized study

OBJECTIVE

Hemodynamic and clinical performances of 21-mm and 23-mm St Jude Medical Hemodynamic Plus aortic valves (St Jude Medical, Inc, St Paul, Minn) were compared with those of 21-mm and 23-mm St Jude Medical standard cuff aortic valves in the first such multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Hemodynamic Plus valves are mechanical, bileaflet prostheses suitable for the small aortic anulus.

METHODS

Patients with 21-mm and 23-mm anulus diameters were randomized to receive either a Hemodynamic Plus or a standard cuff valve. Postoperatively and at 6 months after the operation, patients underwent 2-dimensional Doppler echocardiography. Ejection fraction, cardiac output, peak gradient, mean gradient, effective orifice area, effective area index, and performance index were calculated. Postoperative and 6-month echocardiographic measurements and their variations across observation times were analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

Of the 140 patients enrolled, 5 died at operation and 1 died of aortic dissection during the follow-up period. Eight patients were lost to follow-up. A total of 125 patients completed the study. In 1 patient a sewing cuff escaped intraoperatively. At 6 months the 21-mm and 23-mm Hemodynamic Plus valves showed significantly lower peak gradients and mean gradients than those of the 21-mm and 23-mm standard cuff valves. The 21-mm Hemodynamic Plus valves had gradients similar to those of the 23-mm Hemodynamic Plus valves. The effective orifice area did not differ significantly between the Hemodynamic Plus and standard cuff valves at either measurement. No valve mismatch was found in the 4 groups of patients. A more enhanced decrease of peak gradients and mean gradients and a more enhanced increase of effective orifice areas, effective area indices, and performance indices were found across observation times for patients with Hemodynamic Plus valves compared with those with standard cuff valves.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical hemodynamic performances of 21-mm and 23-mm St Jude Medical Hemodynamic Plus valves correspond closely with those of standard cuff valves, and gradients are substantially better than those of standard cuff valves of the same diameter. Therefore, use of this valve may minimize the need for aortic anulus enlargement. Early follow-up results with the Hemodynamic Plus valves were excellent, although more time is required to confirm this outcome.

Quantitative assessment of mechanical prosthetic valve area by 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to assess the geometric orifice area of mechanical valve prostheses by transesophageal 3-dimensional echocardiographic planimetry.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Currently used Doppler methods for prosthetic assessment (orifice area-Doppler) were compared with 3D planimetry for orifice area (orifice area-3D) and with manufacturer's values (orifice area-manufacturer) for the corresponding prosthesis types and sizes and with historical controls provided by Doppler literature (orifice area-literature). Twenty-four mechanical valve prostheses (in 22 patients) were studied: 13 in mitral position and 11 in aortic position. Orifice area-manufacturer, orifice area-Doppler, orifice area-literature, and orifice area-3D were 3.6 +/- 1.1 cm(2), 2.3 +/- 0.9 cm(2), 2.4 +/- 0.9 cm(2), and 2.6 +/- 0.7 cm(2), respectively. Orifice area-manufacturer values were significantly larger. Correlation coefficients between orifice area-3D and orifice area-manufacturer, and between orifice area-3D and orifice area-Doppler and orifice area-literature were 0.83, 0.90, and 0.73, respectively (all P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography is feasible and has good correlation with orifice area-Doppler (in aortic position) and good correlation with orifice area-manufacturer (in aortic and mitral positions) methods.

Reoperation for prosthetic aortic valve obstruction in the era of echocardiography: trends in diagnostic testing and comparison with surgical findings

OBJECTIVES

We sought to: 1) identify trends in the diagnostic testing of patients with prosthetic aortic valve (AVR) obstruction who undergo reoperation and 2) compare diagnostic test results with pathologic findings at surgery.

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether Doppler transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) have reduced hemodynamic catheterization rates.

METHODS

We reviewed 92 consecutive cases ofAVR reoperation at a single center from 1989 to 1998, comparing 49 cases of mechanical AVR obstruction (group A) to 43 cases of bioprosthetic obstruction (group B). Preoperative Doppler TTE was performed in all cases.

RESULTS

In group A cases, there was a marginally significant trend towards lower catheterization rates for the Gorlin AVR area, from 36% in 1989 to 1990 to 10% in 1997 to 1998 (p = 0.07), but diagnostic TEE utilization (47% of cases) did not vary. The cause of mechanical AVR obstruction was pannus in 26 cases (53%), mismatch (P-PM) in 19 (39%) and thrombosis in 4 (8%). The mechanism (pannus/thrombus vs. mismatch) was identified in 10% by TTE and 49% by TEE (p < 0.001). In group B cases, hemodynamic catheterization rates (21%) and diagnostic TEE utilization (21%) did not vary with time. Obstruction was caused by structural degeneration in 37 cases (86%), thrombosis in 3 (7%), mismatch in 2 (5%) and pannus in 1 (2%). The mechanism was correctly identified in 63% by TTE and in 81% by TEE (p = 0.18).

CONCLUSIONS

Doppler TTE is the primary means to diagnose AVR obstruction; hemodynamic catheterization is not routinely needed. In unselected patients with mechanical AVR obstruction, TEE differentiation of pannus or thrombus from mismatch is challenging.

Hemodynamic evaluation of 19-mm Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in aortic position

BACKGROUND

The aortic Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis offers good long-term clinical outcomes with a low rate of structural deterioration. However, little in vivo hemodynamic data is available for this bioprosthesis.

METHODS

To determine the hemodynamic performance of the 19-mm Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve, both cardiac catheterization and dobutamine stress echocardiography were electively performed in 10 patients. The mean age at the study was 71.6 +/- 4.4 years and the mean body surface area was 1.39 +/- 0.11 m2. The peak-to-peak gradient, instantaneous peak gradient, mean gradient, and valve orifice area were measured by standard cardiac catheterization. The Doppler-derived gradients and valve orifice area were also measured both at rest and during dobutamine infusion.

RESULTS

The average peak-to-peak gradient, instantaneous peak gradient, mean gradient, and valve orifice area measured by catheterization were 13.0 +/- 5.4 mmHg, 28.5 +/- 7.7 mmHg, 12.0 +/- 4.9 mmHg, and 1.55 +/- 0.45 cm2, respectively. The peak and mean Doppler gradients, and valve orifice area by resting echocardiography were 27.7 +/- 9.5 mmHg, 12.3 +/- 4.8 mmHg, and 1.39 +/- 0.26 cm2, respectively. At a dosage of 10 microg/kg/min of dobutamine, the mean Doppler gradient rose mildly to 22.2 +/- 4.8 mmHg, while the cardiac output increased from 4.49 +/- 0.44 to 6.64 +/- 0.87 L/min. The valve orifice area during the 10 microg/kg/min dobutamine infusion (1.55 +/- 0.25 cm2) was significantly larger than its value at rest (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

With acceptable hemodynamic performance, use of the aortic 19-mm Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve is a reliable option for elderly patients with a small annulus.

Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention

Prosthesis-patient mismatch is present when the effective orifice area of the inserted prosthetic valve is less than that of a normal human valve. This is a frequent problem in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement, and its main hemodynamic consequence is the generation of high transvalvular gradients through normally functioning prosthetic valves. The purposes of this report are to present an update on the concept of aortic prosthesis-patient mismatch and to review the present knowledge with regard to its impact on hemodynamic status, functional capacity, morbidity and mortality. Also, we propose a simple approach for the prevention and clinical management of this phenomenon because it can be largely avoided if certain simple factors are taken into consideration before the operation.

An evaluation of prosthetic aortic valves using transesophageal echocardiography: the double-envelope technique

The conventional continuity equation uses nonsimultaneous measurements of blood flow velocities through the left ventricular outflow tract and across the aortic valve to calculate aortic valve area (AVA). We have noted that both velocities can be simultaneously obtained from continuous wave (CW) Doppler analysis (double-envelope [DE]). We hypothesize that prosthetic AVA can be calculated by using the DE technique, during transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Prosthetic AVA was calculated in 41 of 45 patients immediately after aortic valve replacement by using the DE/AVA technique. Left ventricular outflow tract diameter was obtained from an esophageal view, while subvalvular (V(1)) and valvular (V(2)) peak velocities were simultaneously obtained from transgastric views by using CW Doppler. Prosthetic AVA and V(1)/V(2) ratio (Doppler velocity index) were calculated. V(1) was also measured by using pulse wave Doppler, as is conventionally done. Twenty-three Carbomedic (CM) and 18 Carpentier-Edwards (CE) AVA were evaluated. DE/AVAs for CM and CE valves correlated and agreed with that reported by the manufacturer (CM r(2) = 0.91, mean bias -0.25 cm(2) [SD 0.18]; CE r(2) = 0.73, mean bias -0.02 cm(2) [SD 0.27]). Calculated Doppler velocity index values agree with available data (mean bias 0.03 [SD 0.05]). The V(1) obtained by using the DE method was nearly identical to the V(1) obtained by using pulse wave (r(2) = 0.95, mean bias 0.02 m/s [SD 0.04 m/s]). TEE assessment of prosthetic AVA using the DE technique agrees with data reported by the manufacturer. Obtaining subvalvular and valvular velocities from the same CW Doppler trace may simplify the continuity equation and help avoid errors caused by beat-to-beat changes in blood flow. Quantitative prosthetic aortic valve assessment can be performed, on-line, with TEE by using the DE technique.

IMPLICATIONS

Quantitative assessment of prosthetic aortic valve area can be performed on-line by using transesophageal echocardiography using the double envelope technique.

Stress echocardiography in valvular heart disease

Stress echocardiography has been widely accepted as an important diagnostic and prognostic tool in the assessment of known or suspected coronary artery disease. Its use in valvular heart disease, to date, has been more limited, but is continuing to grow as the technology and the understanding of valvular disorders progress. In this article, we will review the current literature regarding the use of both exercise and pharmacological stress testing in conjunction with echocardiography in the settings of native and prosthetic mitral and aortic valve disease. We will also discuss the limitations of this modality and touch upon possible future areas of investigation.

The CarboMedics "Top-Hat" supraannular prosthesis

BACKGROUND

The CarboMedics "Top-Hat" supraannular prosthesis was designed to permit the implantation of a larger prosthesis.

METHODS

Between June 1993 and November 1996, 127 patients (average age, 61.8+/-10.2 years) received a CarboMedics "Top-Hat" supraannular aortic prosthesis. The average follow-up was 15.7 months, and all surviving patients underwent echocardiographic study. This group is compared with 656 patients in whom a standard CarboMedics prosthesis was implanted and also with 2,927 patients who received other aortic prostheses.

RESULTS

Using the standard and the supraannular sizers, there was an average increase of one size in favor of the supraannular prosthesis: 18.9+/-2.8 mm standard versus 20.8+/-2.6 mm supraannular (p < 0.005). For each prosthesis size (19 to 23 mm), the body surface area of the patients in whom a CarboMedics supraannular prosthesis was implanted was significantly smaller than that in those who received a CarboMedics standard prosthesis or any other model. Hospital mortality was 3.9%, and late mortality was 5.5%. The actuarial survival was 86.5%+/-3.9% at 42 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the CarboMedics supraannular prosthesis allows implantation of a larger prosthesis compared with the standard CarboMedics prosthesis or other models. This advantage is especially important in patients with a small aortic root.

Usefulness of the indexed effective orifice area at rest in predicting an increase in gradient during maximum exercise in patients with a bioprosthesis in the aortic valve position

This study examines the hemodynamic behavior of aortic bioprosthetic valves during maximum exercise. Nineteen patients with a normally functioning stented bioprosthetic valve and preserved left ventricular function were submitted to maximum ramp bicycle exercise. In 14 of the 19 patients, valve effective orifice area and mean gradient were measured at rest and during exercise using Doppler echocardiography. At peak exercise (mean maximal workload 118 +/- 53 W), the cardiac index increased by 122 +/- 34% (+3.18 +/- 0.71 L/min/ m2, p <0.001), whereas mean gradient increased by 94 +/- 49% (+12 +/- 8 mm Hg, p <0.001), and effective orifice area by 9 +/- 13% (+0.15 +/- 0.22 cm2, p = 0.02). A strong correlation was found between the increase in mean gradient during maximum exercise and the valve area at rest indexed for body surface area (r = 0.84, p <0.0001). Due to the increase in valve area, the increase in gradient was less (-9 +/- 7 mm Hg, -41 +/- 33%, p = 0.0006) than theoretically predicted assuming a fixed valve area. These results suggest that the effective orifice area of the bioprostheses has the capacity to increase during exercise; therefore, limiting the increase in gradient. The relation found between the indexed effective orifice area at rest and the increase in gradient during exercise should be useful in predicting the hemodynamic behavior of a stented bioprosthesis during exercise.

Dobutamine Stress Test to Evaluate Different Sizes of Prosthetic Aortic Valves

Dobutamine stress testing and Doppler echocardiography were used to assess hemodynamics in 27 patients aged 16 to 54 years with various sizes and types of aortic valve prosthesis. All patients underwent a symptom-limited treadmill exercise test within two days of the dobutamine test. There was no significant difference in ejection fractions and transvalvular gradients at rest and during dobutamine stress between St. Jude Medical, Medtronic-Hall, and Carbomedics valves. Exercise duration did not differ significantly among the different types of valve. When patients were classified by their underlying lesion, those with aortic stenosis and those with aortic insufficiency had similar ejection fractions and transvalvular gradients at rest and during dobutamine stress. The mean and peak transvalvular gradients at rest and during dobutamine stress were significantly different in patients with different valve sizes but the extent of the increase in gradients during stress was not significant. Linear regression analysis revealed that both peak and mean gradients during dobutamine stress could be predicted by the resting gradients. There was a negative correlation between valve size and gradients at rest and during stress, while there was a significant correlation between exercise duration and valve size. Dobutamine stress echocardiography was useful for studying hemodynamics in patients with aortic valve prostheses and the findings show that valvular size was the main determinant of exercise capacity.

Functional hemodynamic assessment of the 21-mm and 23-mm CarboMedics Top Hat aortic prosthetic valve

Between 1993 and 1996 the CarboMedics Top Hat supraannular aortic valve was implanted in 41 patients at the Wessex Cardiothoracic Centre (age, 39 to 74 years; mean, 61.3+/-8.9 years). Comparisons of annular dimensions made at surgery indicate that conventional annular valve replacement would have required at least a size smaller valve. This was particularly marked when a prosthetic mitral valve was in place. Operative mortality was 2.4%. There were also three late deaths. Echocardiography before and after symptom-limited treadmill testing has been performed in 21 patients. The mean time to follow-up was 16.1 months. The Doppler-derived indices of forward flow pre- and postexercise were expressed as mean+/-standard deviation. For 23-mm valves the values were: peak valve gradient 21.43+/-7.46 mm Hg and 35.86+/-14.4 mm Hg, aortic valve area 1.13+/-0.39 cm2 and 1.24+/-0.54 cm2. For 21-mm valves the values were: peak valve gradient 24.84+/-8.2 mm Hg and 31.29+/-5.84 mm Hg, aortic valve area 1.08+/-0.44 cm2 and 0.95 +/-0.2 cm2. The Top Hat valve has a good hemodynamic profile at rest and during exercise. Surgical considerations make it particularly useful in patients with a small aortic annulus and in patients undergoing combined aortic and mitral valve replacement.

Hemodynamic performance of the 21-mm St. Jude BioImplant prosthesis using dobutamine Doppler echocardiography

This study examines the hemodynamic performance of small size St. Jude BioImplant aortic prostheses using dobutamine echocardiography. Eleven patients (3 women, mean age 75 years) who had undergone aortic valve replacement with a size 21-mm St. Jude BioImplant aortic prostheses at 10.8 +/- 5.1 months (SD) previously were studied. Dobutamine infusion was started at a rate of 5 microg/kg/min and increased to 10 microg/kg/min, and subsequently to 20 microg/kg/min at 15-minute intervals. Pulsed and continuous-wave Doppler studies were performed at rest and at the end of each stage. Effective orifice area, mean gradient, and the performance index across each prosthesis were calculated and cardiac output was determined by Doppler measurement of flow in the left ventricular outflow tract. Stress dobutamine increased heart rate and cardiac output by 51% and 56%, respectively (both p <0.0001), and the mean transvalvular gradient increased from 30.1 +/- 7.5 mm Hg at rest to 49.3 +/- 11.5 mm Hg at maximum stress (p <0.0005). The performance index increased progressively from 0.29 +/- 0.05 at rest to 0.40 +/- 0.10 at maximum stress (p <0.0005). Regression modeling analyses demonstrated that the maximum stress gradient was independent of all variables except the resting gradient (p = 0.03). Body surface area had no effect on the changes in cardiac output, effective orifice area, or transprosthetic gradient at maximum stress. Thus, these data demonstrate that the size 21-mm St. Jude BioImplant prosthesis exhibits suboptimal hemodynamic performance with transvalvular gradients consistent with mild to moderate aortic stenosis, both at rest and under stress conditions.

Effects of dobutamine on aortic valve indexes in asymptomatic patients with bileaflet mechanical prostheses in the aortic valve position

We investigated the effects of alternating transvalvular flow rate on Doppler-derived aortic valve resistance and valve area in asymptomatic patients with mechanical aortic valve replacement under dobutamine infusion. The Gorlin-derived aortic valve area and continuity equation-derived aortic valve area seem to be less flow dependent; valve resistance tends to be flow dependent.

Extent and pattern of regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with small size CarboMedics aortic valves

OBJECTIVE

To assess the extent and pattern of regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after valve replacement for aortic stenosis, we studied 26 patients receiving either 19 or 21 mm CarboMedics valves (group I, 13 patients) or either 23 or 25 mm CarboMedics valves (group II, 13 patients). The studies were done before the operation and after 3 years, and results were compared with those of 10 control patients.

METHODS

Left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic diameters and volumes, ejection fraction and fractional shortening, and interventricular septum and posterior wall thickness were measured. The ratio between interventricular septum and posterior wall thickness, the ratio between left ventricular wall thickness and left ventricular chamber radius, and the left ventricular mass were then calculated.

RESULTS

At follow-up there was a significant reduction in the left ventricular mass, interventricular septum, and posterior wall thickness for both patient groups (p < 0.01). However, only the posterior wall thickness reached normal values; the interventricular septum and the left ventricular mass indices were still significantly greater than in the control group (p < 0.01). Because of the incomplete regression of interventricular septal hypertrophy, the ratio between interventricular septum and posterior wall thickness was similar between both patient groups but it was significantly higher than in control subjects (p < 0.01). The ratio between wall thickness and chamber radius did not decrease significantly in group II patients, in whom it remained above the control values.

CONCLUSION

Having a bileaflet aortic prosthesis of one size larger did not seem to significantly influence the pattern and the extent of regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after an intermediate period of follow-up.

Hemodynamic performance of small aortic valve bioprostheses: is there a difference?

BACKGROUND

There is the potential for left ventricular outflow obstruction when small aortic valve bioprostheses are employed in normal-sized or large adults. It has been hoped that bovine pericardial valves would improve hemodynamic performance in the smaller tissue valve sizes.

METHODS

To determine in vivo hemodynamic performance of heterograft aortic valve prostheses, we analyzed echocardiographic data from patients receiving 21- or 23-mm Carpentier-Edwards pericardial, Medtronic Intact, and Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprostheses. In addition, data from 19-mm Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valves were included for comparison of hemodynamic performance between valve sizes. Doppler echocardiography was performed in 151 patients within 2 weeks of operation. Left ventricular outflow gradient was derived from continuous Doppler measurements of flow velocity, and effective orifice area was calculated by the continuity equation.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant differences in hemodynamic performance of different sized prostheses for each valve type (effective orifice area, p < 0.01; valvular gradient, p < 0.03). There were, however, no significant differences in effective orifice area or mean gradient for different valve types within each size category.

CONCLUSIONS

The in vivo hemodynamic performance of these three different aortic valve heterograft bioprostheses is similar. Patient-prosthesis mismatch with heterograft prostheses, as demonstrated by the indexed effective orifice area can be avoided by appropriate sizing and use of annular enlarging techniques when necessary.

Doppler Hemodynamics of CarboMedics Prosthetic Valves in Aortic Position at Rest and Exercise

To evaluate the size adequacy of CarboMedics prosthetic heart valves, Doppler pressure gradients after aortic valve replacement were determined at rest and immediately after exercise in 83 patients, at a mean time of 18.8 days after aortic valve replacement with CarboMedics prosthetic heart valves (31 standard and 52 R-series). There were 54 males and 29 females, average age 55 years; 12 had pure aortic stenosis, 47 had aortic regurgitation, and 24 had combined lesions. Exercise significantly increased (p < 0.01) the peak velocity (from 2.50 to 2.88 m/sec), the peak pressure gradient (from 25.9 to 34.6 mm Hg), and the mean pressure gradient (from 13.9 to 18.4 mm Hg). Significant differences were observed even in patients with seemingly large valve sizes. Significant correlation (p < 0.0001) was observed between pressure gradients at rest and immediately after exercise, as well as between pressure gradients and theoretical performance index. A theoretical performance index larger than 1.0 cm2/m2 was needed to obtain a postexercise Doppler peak pressure gradient of less than 60 mm Hg early after aortic valve replacement using either the Carbomedics standard or R-series prosthetic heart valves.

Early in vivo experience with the Hemodynamic Plus St. Jude Medical heart valves in patients with narrowed aortic annulus

BACKGROUND

Small aortic orifice primarily resulted in heart prosthesis mismatch in a significant number of patients. The Hemodynamic Plus (HP) series of St. Jude Medical heart valves represents an interesting innovation, allowing a larger valve orifice area with an equivalent tissue annulus diameter.

METHODS

Hemodynamic characteristics of the 21-mm HP St. Jude Medical valve were prospectively compared with those of the standard 21-mm and 23-mm St. Jude Medical valves in three groups of 22 patients. Patients were selected from a database to be rigorously matched for age, sex, body surface area, functional class, underlying lesion, native valve opening area, left ventricular function, and preoperative peak and mean valve gradients. Postoperative evaluation (follow-up ranging from 3 to 24 months; mean, 11.5 months) included clinical examination and echocardiographic studies.

RESULTS

There was no operative mortality or significant perioperative complications. Short-term clinical follow-up was marked by a complete absence of valve-related complications. Presently, all but 1 patient in the 21-mm HP group and 2 in the 21-mm standard group are in New York Heart Association functional class I. Doppler echocardiography-derived mean and maximal pressure gradients were significantly lower in the 21-mm HP group (8.1 +/- 1.9 and 16.4 +/- 3.4 mm Hg) than in the 21-mm standard group (13.4 +/- 3.9 and 21.2 +/- 4.3 mm Hg; p = 0.002 and p = 0.0004, respectively), confirming the better hemodynamic performance already described in in vitro studies. Pressure gradients did not differ significantly between the 21-mm HP and the 23-mm standard groups. The 21-mm HP valve demonstrated the highest performance index; 0.66 +/- 0.08, compared with 0.49 +/- 0.09 for the 21-mm standard valve (p < 0.001) and 0.59 +/- 0.07 for the 23-mm standard valve (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In vivo hemodynamic performance of the 21-mm HP valve corresponds closely to that of the 23-mm standard valve and is substantially better than that of the 21-mm standard valve. The 21-mm HP St. Jude Medical valve demonstrates excellent hemodynamic characteristics and can be recommended in normal-sized adult patients with narrow aortic root. This valve will minimize the need for aortic annulus enlargement.

Comparison of hemodynamic performances of St. Jude Medical and CarboMedics 21 mm aortic prostheses by means of dobutamine stress echocardiography

Dobutamine stress Doppler echocardiography was used to compare the hemodynamic performance of two small aortic bileaflet prostheses. Nineteen patients (14 female, mean age 64 years) who had undergone aortic valve replacement with 21 mm bileaflet valve prostheses (St. Jude Medical valve, n = 9, or CarboMedics valve, n = 10) were studied. Dobutamine infusion was started at a rate of 5 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 and increased to 10 and 20 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 at 15-minute intervals. Under maximum stress, heart rate and cardiac output increased by 70% and 120%, respectively, and mean arterial blood pressure decreased by 9%. Pulsed-wave and continuous-wave Doppler studies were performed at rest and at the end of each stage. Velocity ratio, effective orifice area, performance index, and discharge coefficient of the valve were calculated, and peak and mean velocities and pressure drops across the prostheses were measured. Dobutamine infusion produced similar increases in cardiac output in all patients. Effective orifice areas, discharge coefficients, and performance indexes were comparable for the two valve groups both at rest and maximum stress. Transvalvular velocities and pressure drops were also similar in the two valve groups. Transvalvular pressure drops were also comparable in patients with large body surface area. Dobutamine stress echocardiography is useful in the evaluation of the hemodynamic performance of prosthetic heart valves. St. Jude Medical and CarboMedics 21 mm prostheses have equally favorable hemodynamic performances in most patients under conditions of high cardiac output.

Evaluation of the hemodynamic performance of small CarboMedics aortic prostheses using dobutamine-stress Doppler echocardiography

BACKGROUND

The well-known correlation between prosthetic valve orifice area and transvalvular gradients has raised concerns about the presence of significant residual gradients when the size of the prosthesis that can be implanted is limited by the presence of a small aortic annulus.

METHODS

Dobutamine-stress Doppler echocardiography was used to evaluate the hemodynamic performance of small CarboMedics aortic prostheses (19 mm and 21 mm) in 18 patients (16 women; mean age, 64 years) who had undergone aortic valve replacement 23.5 +/- 19 months (standard deviation) previously. Dobutamine infusion was started at a rate of 5 micrograms.kg-1.min-2 and increased to 10 and 20 micrograms.kg-1.min-2 at 15-minute intervals. Pulsed and continuous wave Doppler studies were performed at rest and at the end of each stage. Effective orifice area, performance index, and discharge coefficient of both valves were calculated, and peak and mean velocity and pressure drop across the prostheses were measured.

RESULTS

Heart rate and cardiac output increased by 74% and 94%, respectively, and mean arterial blood pressure decreased by 9% at maximum stress. Effective orifice area, discharge coefficient, and performance index were comparable in both valve sizes at rest and maximum stress. Also, there was no significant difference in mean transvalvular pressure drop (gradient) for 19-mm and 21-mm prostheses at rest (8.1 +/- 8.4 and 4.8 +/- 3.8 mm Hg) or maximum stress (15.1 +/- 14.2 and 8.8 +/- 5.8 mm Hg, respectively). No significant correlation could be demonstrated between transvalvular pressure drop and patient's body surface area.

CONCLUSIONS

These data show that 19-mm and 21-mm CarboMedics aortic prostheses exhibit equally favorable hemodynamic performance with minimal pressure gradient, both at rest and under stress conditions.