Aortic valvuloplasty for aortic insufficiency associated with ventricular septal defect

Aortic Regurgitation with Ventricular Septal Defect in the Young

This study was carried out to assess the outcome in patients who had aortic valve replacement compared to those who underwent aortic valve repair for aortic regurgitation associated with a ventricular septal defect. Of 300 patients undergoing ventricular septal defect closure between May 1990 and December 2003, 36 (12%) had moderate to severe aortic regurgitation; 7 underwent concomitant aortic valve repair and 29 had aortic valve replacement. The mean age of these 36 patients was 17.72 ± 6.84 years, and 69% were male. Follow-up was 8.20 ± 4.97 years in the valve replacement group and 4.1 ± 0.8 years in the valve repair group. The freedom from re-operation after valve repair was 76% after 4 years. After one year of follow-up in 35 patients, 27 were in New York Heart Association class I (77%) and 8 were in class II (23%). After 8 years, 12/21 (57%) patients were in class I, 5 (24%) in class II, and 2 (10%) in class III. Of 22 patients who had a dilated left ventricle, 15 regained normal left ventricular function and volume. Valve repair is preferred, but increasing age makes valve replacement a better alternative.

Aortic valve repair

Aortic valve replacement options are limited in children, and all of them have disadvantages. Aortic valve repair techniques have evolved slowly and have not gained wide acceptance; however, large series using a variety of techniques demonstrate that valve repair is possible with excellent early hemodynamics and satisfactory intermediate durability. The results of aortic valve repair at the Children's Hospital of Wisconsin are presented. Simple repairs (blunt valvotomy, commissurotomy, or commissurotomy with leaflet thinning) directed at congenital aortic stenosis resulted in 86% +/- 5% freedom from reintervention at 10 years. Repair of aortic insufficiency with ventricular septal defect (VSD) resulted in 93.3% +/- 6% freedom from reoperation at 10 years. Complex repairs included a combination of techniques and yielded 5-year freedom from reintervention of 83% +/- 7% compared with 73% +/- 11% for patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (P = .62). Aortic valve repair provides an alternative to aortic valve replacement in selected patients. The utility of aortic valve repair and aortic valve replacement must be measured not only in freedom from reintervention but also in regression of left ventricular mass and exercise testing. Improvement in outcome depends on better patient selection and suitable bioprosthetic materials.