Long-term results of radiation therapy for prostate cancer recurrence following radical prostatectomy

Radiotherapy after Prostatectomy

Aims and background

The role of radiotherapy after prostatectomy is controversial. This paper tries to give some guidelines for everyday practice through an analysis of literature data.

Methods

The potential role of radiotherapy in the adjuvant and salvage setting is discussed. We also report and interpret available literature data for both settings.

Results

As regards an increase in or detectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after radical prostatectomy, about 40–50% of patients are rendered bNED with local salvage radiotherapy, but only 10–50% are long-term (5 years) biochemically controlled. A timely salvage treatment is crucial to optimize control probability. As regards adjuvant radiotherapy for undetectable postoperative PSA in patients at high risk of failure as judged on pathology, results are more encouraging. Recent data report bNED rates ≥70% at 5 years.

Conclusions

Although results are far from satisfactory, salvage radiotherapy should be considered for every patient with an increased or detectable PSA after surgery. Adjuvant radiotherapy seems preferable to salvage radiotherapy for patients at high (>30%) risk of failure.

Benefit on Biochemical Control of Adjuvant Radiation Therapy in Patients with Pathologically Involved Seminal Vesicles after Radical Prostatectomy

Aims and Background

To determine whether there is a benefit for biochemical control with adjuvant radiation therapy to the surgical bed following radical prostatectomy in patients with seminal vesicle invasion and pathologically negative pelvic lymph nodes (pT3b-pT4 pN0).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of radical prostatectomy patients treated between 1995 and 2002. A total of 66 patients with seminal vesicle invasion were identified: 45 of these patients received adjuvant radiation therapy and 21 were observed. Radiation therapy was initiated within 4 months of prostatectomy. Median dose was 66 Gy (range, 60–70 Gy). Median follow-up from the day of surgery was 40.6 months (mean, 41.5; range, 12–99). Biochemical recurrence was defined as the first value ≥0.2 ng/ml.

Results

At two years, the proportion of patients free from biochemical recurrence was 80% in patients who received adjuvant radiation therapy versus 54% for those not given radiation therapy (P = 0.036). Actuarial biochemical recurrence at 5 years was 59% vs 41% for the radiation therapy and no radiation therapy groups, respectively. On univariate Cox regression model, the hazard of biochemical failure was also associated with a detectable (≥0.2 ng/ml) postsurgical prostate-specific antigen (P = 0.02) prior to radiation therapy. Pathological T stage (pT3b vs pT4), Gleason score, primary Gleason pattern and positive surgical margins were not significantly associated with biochemical recurrence. The hazard of biochemical failure was around 85% lower in the radiation therapy group than in the observation group (P = 0.002).

Conclusions

Data from the present series suggest that adjuvant radiation therapy for patients with seminal vesicle invasion and undetectable (≤0.2 ng/ml) postoperative prostate-specific antigen significantly reduces the likelihood of biochemical failure.

Post-prostatectomy radiotherapy adversely affects urinary continence irrespective of radiotherapy regime

PURPOSE

To investigate the influence of different postoperative radiotherapy (RT) regimes on post-prostatectomy continence and QoL.

METHODS

Men after prostatectomy (RP) and RT were assigned in adjuvant (ART), early salvage (ESRT) and salvage radiotherapy (SRT) groups depending on time of initiation, indication and pre-RT-PSA (≤/>0.5 ng/ml). Continence and QoL outcomes were evaluated by validated questionnaire. Statistical analysis included students t test, Chi square, Fisher's test, ROC- and McNemar-Bowker-Analyses.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 5.1 years. 33.5, 38.2 and 28.3% received ART, ESRT and SRT, respectively. Mean time to RT was 0.3 (±0.4), 1.8 (±2.5) and 3.3 (±3.6) years respectively. Differences in age at RP (p = 0.54) and RT (p = 0.47) between groups were not significant. Mean-RT-dose was similar (p = 0.70). Differences in continence distribution between groups before (p = 0.56) and after RT (p = 0.38) were not significant. No significant differences were observed for frequency (p = 0.58) or amount (p = 0.88) of urine loss, impact on QoL (p = 0.13) and ICIQ-SF scores (p = 0.69) between groups. Even though no significant difference in post-RT-continence (p = 0.89) was observed in the direct comparison between groups, a significant worsening of long-term continence was observed in all groups (p < 0.001). We found no cutoff and no time-point after RP at which this negative effect of RT on continence became insignificant (AUC = 0.474). A subgroup with apparent local recurrence showed no differences for ICIQ-SF-score (p = 0.155), QoL (0.077), incontinence grade (p = 0.387), frequency (p = 0.182) and amount (p = 0.415) of urine loss. Proportionally more men in this subgroup remembered deterioration of continence after RT (p = 0.029).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative RT adversely affects long-term continence; this negative effect is irrespective of time of initiation or indication for RT. These results suggest a need for innovative strategies of prostate cancer therapy with lasting oncological, functional and QoL outcomes.

Select men benefit from androgen deprivation therapy delivered with salvage radiation therapy after prostatectomy

BACKGROUND

Which men benefit most from adding androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to salvage radiation therapy (SRT) after prostatectomy has not clearly been defined; therefore, we evaluated the impact of ADT to SRT on failure-free survival (FFS) in men with a rising or persistent PSA after prostatectomy.

METHODS

We identified 332 men who received SRT after prostatectomy from 1987 to 2010. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) identified favorable, intermediate and unfavorable groups based on the risk of failure after SRT alone. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests compared FFS with and without ADT.

RESULTS

Forty-three percent received SRT alone and 57% received SRT with ADT (median 6.6 months (interquartile range (IQR) 5.8-18.1) ADT). Median SRT dose was 70 Gy (IQR 70-70), and median follow-up after SRT was 6.7 years (IQR 4.5-10.8). On Cox's proportional hazard regression, ADT improved FFS (adjusted hazard ratio 0.60, 95% confidence interval: 0.42-0.86; P=0.006). RPA classified unfavorable disease as negative surgical margins (SMs) and preradiation PSA of ⩾0.5 ng ml^-1. Favorable disease had neither adverse factor, and intermediate disease had one adverse factor. The addition of ADT to SRT improved 5-year FFS for men with unfavorable disease (70.3% vs 23.4%; P<0.001) and intermediate disease (69.8% vs 48.0%; P=0.003), but not for men with favorable disease (81.2% vs 78.0%; P=0.971).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of ADT to SRT appears to improve FFS for men with a preradiation PSA of ⩾0.5 ng ml^-1 or with negative SM at prostatectomy. Men with involved surgical margins and PSA <0.5 ng ml^-1 appear to be at a lower risk of failure after SRT alone and may not derive as much benefit from the administration of ADT with SRT. These results are hypothesis-generating only, and further prospective data are required to see if ADT can safely be omitted in this select group of men.

The impact of adjuvant therapy in patients with biochemical recurrence on prostate cancer progression and mortality five years after radical prostatectomy

INTRODUCTION

The clinical significance of biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) due to prostate cancer (PCa) is not unambiguous, sometimes being independent from the real progression. BCR is followed by a greater risk of adverse events and almost always results with the necessity for implementation of adjuvant therapy (AT). The aim of the following study was to examine the impact of AT in patients with BCR together with PCa progression and mortality 5-years after RP.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Two hundred forty-seven patients after RP, who were treated in the period from 1995 to 2009, underwent the retrospective analysis. They were divided into three groups according to the applied AT after prior BCR diagnosis. The first group (n - 39) included patients treated with radiotherapy, along with hormonotherapy. The second group (n - 63) covers patients receiving hormonotherapy only. The third group (n - 145) consists of patients without BCR. Five-year general and disease-specific survival was evaluated and choice prognostic factors were compared.

RESULTS

Five-year overall survival was 74.2% in group I, 88.3% in group II, and 98.7% in group III. Diseasespecific survival was: 76.9%, 90.5%, and 100% (p = 0.001), respectively. BCR was diagnosed in 102 (41.5%) patients; while in another 24 (23.5%) of them progression was diagnosed after the AT was applied.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of BCR 5-years after RP is greater in patients with high initial concentration of PSA, higher Gleason score, and clinical advancement. Five-year overall and disease-specific survivals are higher among patients after hormonotherapy alone compared to those after both radio- and hormonotherapy.

Adjuvant radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Men who have a radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer that does not involve lymph nodes, but extends beyond the prostate capsule into the seminal vesicles or to surgical margins, are at increased risk of relapse. In men with these high risk factors, radiotherapy (RT) directed at the prostate bed after surgery may reduce this risk, and be curative.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of adjuvant RT following RP for prostate cancer in men with high risk features compared with RP.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Prostatic Diseases and Urological Cancers Specialised Register (23 February 2011), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE (January 1966 to February 2011), PDQ® (Physician Data Query) trial registry databases for ongoing studies (2 November 2010), reference lists from selected studies and reviews, and handsearched relevant conference proceedings.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCT) comparing RP followed by RT with RP alone.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed the studies for inclusion and bias and extracted data for analysis. Authors were contacted to clarify data and obtain missing information.

MAIN RESULTS

We found three RCTs involving 1815 men. Adjuvant RT following prostatectomy did not affect overall survival at 5 years (RD (risk difference) 0.00; 95% CI -0.03 to 0.03), but improved survival at 10 years (RD -0.11; 95% CI -0.20 to -0.02). Adjuvant RT did not improve prostate cancer-specific mortality at 5 years (RD -0.01; 95% CI -0.03 to 0.00). Adjuvant RT did not reduce metastatic disease at 5 years (RD -0.00; 95% CI -0.04 to 0.03), but reduced it at 10 years (RD -0.11; 95% CI -0.20 to -0.01). It improved local control at 5 and 10 years (RD -0.10; 95% CI -0.13 to -0.06 and RD -0.14; 95% CI -0.21 to -0.07, respectively), and biochemical progression-free survival at 5 years and 10 years (RD -0.16; 95% CI -0.21 to -0.11 and RD -0.29; 95% CI -0.39 to -0.19, respectively). There were no data for clinical disease-free survival. Adjuvant RT increased acute and late gastrointestinal toxicity [do you have the rd for this?], urinary stricture (RD 0.05; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.09) and incontinence (RD 0.04; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.08). It did not increase erectile dysfunction or degrade quality of life (RD 0.01; 95% CI -0.06 to -0.26), but with limited data.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant RT after RP improves overall survival and reduces the rate of distant metastases, but these effects are only evident with longer follow up. At 5 and 10 years it improves local control and reduces the risk of biochemical failure, although the latter is not a clinical endpoint. Moderate or severe acute and late toxicity is minimal. There is an increased risk of urinary stricture and incontinence, but no detriment to quality of life, based on limited data. Given that the majority of men who have undergone a RP have a longer life expectancy, radiotherapy should be considered for those with high-risk features following radical prostatectomy. The optimal timing is unclear.

Salvage radiotherapy following biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy: proceedings of the Genito-Urinary Radiation Oncologists of Canada consensus meeting

For patients with recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy, salvage radiotherapy is the only potentially curative treatment option. However, until recently there has been a paucity of data on the effectiveness of this approach. In light of recently published studies, the Genito-Urinary Radiation Oncologists of Canada (GUROC) met and crafted a consensus statement regarding the current place of salvage radiotherapy. GUROC also identified gaps in current knowledge and identified ongoing study protocols that will advance our knowledge in this area.This report summarizes the main conclusions of the meeting and the commentary provided during the consensus-building process, and outlines the consensus statement that was subsequently adopted.

Salvage radiotherapy for prostate-specific antigen relapse after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a single-center experience

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and prognostic factors of salvage radiotherapy for prostate-specific antigen relapse after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer at a single center in Japan.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the medical records of 51 patients who underwent salvage radiotherapy for prostate-specific antigen relapse after radical prostatectomy was carried out. Salvage radiotherapy was undergone for the single indication of at least two consecutive prostate-specific antigen elevations >0.1 ng/ml. Salvage radiotherapy was delivered to the prostatic bed at a total dose of 60 or 64 Gy. Late toxicity was scored according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 3.0.

RESULTS

A total dose of 60 and 64 Gy were administered to 26 and 25 patients, respectively. The median prostate-specific antigen level at the initiation of radiotherapy was 0.29 ng/ml (range, 0.11-1.10 ng/ml). With a median follow-up of 57.3 months (range, 9.9-134.0 months), the prostate-specific antigen relapse-free rate at 5 years was 50.7%. Multivariate analysis using Cox's proportional hazards regression model revealed that the Gleason score at radical prostatectomy ≥8 significantly predicted prostate-specific antigen relapse after salvage radiotherapy (hazard ratio 4.531; 95% confidence interval 1.413-14.535; P=0.011). The prostate-specific antigen relapse-free rate at 5 years in the Gleason score at radical prostatectomy ≤7 and at radical prostatectomy ≥8 was 62.7 and 15.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage radiotherapy was effective for prostate-specific antigen relapse after radical prostatectomy with tolerable toxicities in Japanese patients. A high Gleason score seemed to be a poor prognostic factor.

Five year biochemical recurrence free survival for intermediate risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy or permanent seed implantation

OBJECTIVE

To compare biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated by retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP), laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP), external beam radiation therapy (RT), or permanent seed implantation (PI).

METHODS

Patients treated for intermediate-risk prostate cancer per National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines from 1996 to 2005 were studied. Variables potentially affecting bRFS were examined using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis. Five-year bRFS rates were calculated by actuarial methods; bRFS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Nadir +2 definition of biochemical failure was used for RT and PI patients; a PSA ≥ 0.4 ng/mL was used for radical prostatectomy (RP) patients. Time to initiation of salvage therapy was compared for each treatment group using the Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULTS

Nine-hundred seventy-nine patients were analyzed with a median follow-up of 65 months. Five years bRFS rate was 82.8% for all patients (89.5% PI, 85.7% RT, 79.9% RRP, and 60.2% LRP). Patients treated by LRP had significantly worse bRFS than RT (P < .0001), PI (P < .0001), or RRP patients (P = .0038). Treatment modality (P < .0001) and average number of PSA tests per year (P < .0001) were the only independent predictors of bRFS on multivariate analysis. Median time to initiation of salvage therapy from time of treatment was 28.6 months for all patients (26.1 RP, 21.0 LRP, 47.4 PI, 47.8 RT; P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer choosing PI, RT, or RRP appear to have improved 5-year bRFS and delayed salvage therapy compared with LRP.

Adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy after prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a literature review

PURPOSE

Given that postprostatectomy recurrence of prostate cancer occurs in 10-40% of patients, the best use of immediate postoperative radiotherapy (RT) in high-risk patients and salvage RT for biochemical recurrence remains a topic of debate. We assessed the levels of evidence (in terms of efficacy, prognostic factors, and toxicity) for the following treatment strategies: immediate postoperative RT alone, salvage RT alone, and the addition of androgen deprivation therapy to the two RT strategies.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A systematic literature search for controlled randomized trials, noncontrolled trials, and retrospective studies between 1990 and 2008 was performed on PubMed, CancerLit, and MEDLINE. Only relevant articles that had appeared in peer-reviewed journals were selected. We report on the levels of evidence (according to the National Cancer Institute guidelines) supporting the various treatment strategies.

RESULTS

Immediate postoperative RT improves biochemical and clinical progression-free survival (Level of evidence, 1.ii) but has no significant effect on metastasis-free survival or overall survival. A pathologic review is of particular importance for correctly analyzing the treatment strategies. Low-grade morbidity has been significantly greater in the postoperative groups, but no severe toxicity has been observed. The influence of immediate postoperative RT on postprostatectomy continence appears to be slight; therefore, immediate postoperative RT should be considered in patients with major risk factors for local relapse (Level of evidence, 1.ii). On the basis of extensive retrospective data, salvage RT is effective in biochemical relapse after prostatectomy; some patients with few adverse prognostic factors might also benefit from salvage RT (Level of evidence, 3.ii). The addition of androgen deprivation therapy to immediate postoperative or salvage RT has only been supported by weak, retrospective data (Level of evidence, 3.ii).

CONCLUSION

Prospective randomized trials are needed to compare immediate postoperative RT with salvage RT and to assess the value of androgen deprivation therapy in this setting.

Salvage radiotherapy for patients with PSA relapse after radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience

Background

To assess the efficacy of salvage radiotherapy (RT) for persistent or rising PSA after radical prostatectomy and to determine prognostic factors identifying patients who may benefit from salvage RT.

Methods

Between 1990 and 2003, 59 patients underwent RT for PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Patients received a median of 66 Gy to the prostate bed with 3D or 2D RT. The main end point was biochemical failure after salvage RT, defined as an increase of the serum PSA value >0.2 ng/ml confirmed by a second elevation.

Results

Median follow-up was 38 months. The 3-year and 5-year bDFS rates were 56.1% and 41.2% respectively. According to multivariate analysis, only preRT PSA ≥1 ng/ml was associated with biochemical relapse.

Conclusion

When delivered early, RT is an effective treatment after radical prostatectomy. Only preRT PSA ≥1 ng/ml predicted relapse.

Predicting PSA failure following salvage radiotherapy for a rising PSA post-prostatectomy: from the CaPSURE database

BACKGROUND

The role of radiotherapy (RT) for rising PSA after radical prostatectomy (RP) is debatable. We analyzed a large database of men to evaluate for predictors of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure after salvage RT.

METHODS

Data from the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor database (CaPSURE) identified 4,563 men with RP between 1989 and 2004; 194 underwent salvage RT > or = 6 months after RP. PSA failure following RT was defined as a PSA >0.2 ng/ml. The association between clinical and pathologic characteristics and PSA failure was examined using a chi-square metric. A multivariable analysis of predictors for time to PSA failure was performed using a Cox proportional hazard regression model.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 66 months, 121 (62%) men experienced PSA failure at a median 20 months. Significant associations for PSA failure were found for the clinical T category (P < .01), race/ethnicity (P = 0.04), pT3 disease (P < 0.01), seminal vesicle invasion (P < 0.01), and pre-RT PSA level (P < 0.01). The pre-RT PSA level (P = 0.07) was the only factor to approach significance as an independent predictor of PSA failure on multivariable analysis. Pre-RT PSA doubling time was calculated for 131 men but did not predict for PSA failure on univariate (P = 0.38) or multivariate analyses (P = 0.13) for < or = 12 vs. >12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage RT provided the greatest benefit in PSA control in men with the lowest pre-RT PSA levels. Post-RP PSA doubling time >12 months trended toward predicting for PSA failure but was not significant likely owing to limited sample size. Together, these findings would suggest that salvage RT is optimal at low pre-RT PSA and long doubling times with favorable pathologic features.

ProstaScint and its role in the diagnosis of prostate cancer

Cancer of the prostate is the most common cancer in males accounting for 33% of newly diagnosed cases. It is the second leading cause of cancer death in American males. The prevalence of prostate cancer increases most rapidly with age and the incidence (unlike other cancers) continues to rise with advancing age. Death due to this cancer is almost invariably the result of failure to control metastatic disease. In addition, several studies have demonstrated that over 30% of patients will experience biochemical recurrence after surgery with long-term (more than 10 years) follow-up. Information regarding the location of the cancer is critical to the success of initial therapy when deciding between local versus systemic treatment options in the newly diagnosed patient. For patients who have already undergone definitive treatment, the localization of recurrent tumor, evidenced by an elevation of prostate-specific antigen, is difficult unless the tumor burden is large enough to be detected on conventional radiographic studies or digital rectal examination and prostatic fossa biopsy. ProstaScint is a diagnostic tool used to detect metastatic prostate cancer in lymph nodes or other sites. This article provides an overview on the uses of ProstaScint in the assessment of patients with recurrent or metastatic prostate cancer.

Identification of Patients With Prostate Cancer Who Benefit From Immediate Postoperative Radiotherapy: EORTC 22911

Purpose

The randomized controlled European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) trial 22911 studied the effect of radiotherapy after prostatectomy in patients with adverse risk factors. Review pathology data of specimens from participants in this trial were analyzed to identify which factors predict increased benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy.

Patients and Methods

After prostatectomy, 1,005 patients with stage pT3 and/or positive surgical margins were randomly assigned to a wait-and-see (n = 503) and an adjuvant radiotherapy (60 Gy conventional irradiation) arm (n = 502). Pathologic review data were available for 552 patients from 11 participating centers. The interaction between the review pathology characteristics and treatment benefit was assessed by log-rank test for heterogeneity (P < .05).

Results

Margin status assessed by review pathology was the strongest predictor of prolonged biochemical disease-free survival with immediate postoperative radiotherapy (heterogeneity, P < .01): by year 5, immediate postoperative irradiation could prevent 291 events/1,000 patients with positive margins versus 88 events/1,000 patients with negative margins. The hazard ratio for immediate irradiation was 0.38 (95% CI, 0.26 to 0.54) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.53 to 1.46) in the groups with positive and negative margins, respectively. We could not identify a significant impact of the positive margin localization.

Conclusion

Provided careful pathology of the prostatectomy is performed, our results suggest that immediate postoperative radiotherapy might not be recommended for prostate cancer patients with negative surgical margins. These findings require validation on an independent data set.

Management of asymptomatic rise in prostatic-specific antigen in patients with prostate cancer

Biochemical failure after curative-intent therapies is an increasingly common dilemma confronting patients and physicians. No definition of biochemical failure exists that can be applied to all forms of treatment and that is not to some degree affected by the follow-up interval, pretreatment prognostic factors, or the frequency of prostatic-specific antigen (PSA) testing. Available imaging techniques lack sensitivity in detection of occult micrometastases. Prognostic factors such as tumor characteristics and PSA kinetics should be considered when recommending second-line therapies. For those patients with suspected localized recurrence, second-line treatment with salvage therapies may provide long-term disease control. Hormonal therapy, although most commonly employed for PSA recurrence, is of palliative benefit only. Currently, the most appropriate therapeutic intervention for asymptomatic patients with evidence of biochemical failure remains undefined.

Predicting the outcome of salvage radiation therapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE

An increasing serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level is the initial sign of recurrent prostate cancer among patients treated with radical prostatectomy. Salvage radiation therapy (SRT) may eradicate locally recurrent cancer, but studies to distinguish local from systemic recurrence lack adequate sensitivity and specificity. We developed a nomogram to predict the probability of cancer control at 6 years after SRT for PSA-defined recurrence.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using multivariable Cox regression analysis, we constructed a model to predict the probability of disease progression after SRT in a multi-institutional cohort of 1,540 patients.

RESULTS

The 6-year progression-free probability was 32% (95% CI, 28% to 35%) overall. Forty-eight percent (95% CI, 40% to 56%) of patients treated with SRT alone at PSA levels of 0.50 ng/mL or lower were disease free at 6 years, including 41% (95% CI, 31% to 51%) who also had a PSA doubling time of 10 months or less or poorly differentiated (Gleason grade 8 to 10) cancer. Significant variables in the model were PSA level before SRT (P < .001), prostatectomy Gleason grade (P < .001), PSA doubling time (P < .001), surgical margins (P < .001), androgen-deprivation therapy before or during SRT (P < .001), and lymph node metastasis (P = .019). The resultant nomogram was internally validated and had a concordance index of 0.69.

CONCLUSION

Nearly half of patients with recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy have a long-term PSA response to SRT when treatment is administered at the earliest sign of recurrence. The nomogram we developed predicts the outcome of SRT and should prove valuable for medical decision making for patients with a rising PSA level.

[PSA recurrence following radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy]

Relapses after curative therapy for localised prostate cancer using radiotherapy or radical prostatectomy occur in a significant percentage of cases, even in times of continually improving patient selection. The definition of a biochemical relapse after surgery is a PSA value of >or=0.4 ng/ml. After radiotherapy with maintenance of the organ and residual PSA production the definition is more complicated. The current algorithm is based on the ASTRO consensus of 1996 and defines a relapse as three consecutive increases in PSA above the post-therapeutic low. A biochemical relapse can indicate a local relapse, systemic metastasising of the disease or a combination of both. The differentiation of these two possibilities can be made, apart from imaging modalities, primarily on the basis of variation in PSA kinetics, whereby a short PSA doubling time and early PSA increase after primary therapy indicate a systemic problem.

Predictive factors for late genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity in patients with prostate cancer treated with adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To determine the rate and magnitude of late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities after salvage or adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer, and to determine predictive factors for these toxicities.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A large multi-institutional database that included 959 men who received postoperative RT after radical prostatectomy (RP) was analyzed: 19% received adjuvant RT, 81% received salvage RT, 78% were treated to the prostate bed only, and 22% received radiation to the pelvis.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 55 months. At 5 years, 10% of patients had Grade 2 late GU toxicity and 1% had Grade 3 late GU toxicity, while 4% of patients had Grade 2 late GI toxicity and 0.4% had Grade 3 late GI toxicity. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that adjuvant RT (p = 0.03), androgen deprivation (p < 0.0001), and prostate bed-only RT (p = 0.007) predicted for Grade 2 or higher late GU toxicity. For GI toxicity, although adjuvant RT was significant in the univariate analysis, no significant factors were found in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the number of high-grade toxicities for postoperative RT was low. Therefore, adjuvant and salvage RT can safely be used in the appropriate settings.

Therapy of recurrent disease after radical prostatectomy in 2007

Recurrence rates of 20-40% after prostatectomy are described. This review will discuss curative treatment options for salvage after primary therapy. Relevant information was identified through searches of published studies, abstracts from scientific meetings, and review articles. Clinical experience in salvage therapy is limited. Conformal radiotherapy to the prostatic bed for PSA relapse and biopsy proven local recurrences after prostatectomy remains the only potentially curative therapy. It can provide durable biochemical control in a range from 17 to 78%. Salvage radiotherapy is well tolerated. Some prognostic factors exist which can help to select the right patient for this treatment. Patients have to be treated early for PSA relapse. Conformal radiotherapy to the prostatic bed for PSA relapse and biopsy proven local recurrences after prostatectomy is a good documented curative therapy. In a patient with a high probability of local recurrence early radiotherapy for PSA relapse is suggested.

Salvage radiotherapy for biochemical relapse after complete PSA response following radical prostatectomy: outcome and prognostic factors for patients who have never received hormonal therapy

Objectives

To evaluate the results of salvage conformal radiation therapy (3DC-EBRT) for patients submitted to radical prostatectomy (RP) who have achieved complete PSA response and who have never been treated with hormonal therapy (HT).

To present the results of biochemical control, a period free from hormonal therapy and factors related to its prognosis.

Materials and methods

from August 2002 to December 2004, 43 prostate cancer patients submitted to RP presented biochemical failure after achieving a PSA < 0.2 ng/ml. They have never received HT and were submitted to salvage 3DC-EBRT. Median age was 62 years, median preoperative PSA was 8.8 ng/ml, median Gleason Score was 7. Any PSA rise above 0.2 was defined as biochemical failure after surgery. Median 3DC-EBRT dose was 70 Gy, biochemical failure after EBRT was defined as 3 consecutive rises in PSA or a single rise enough to trigger HT.

Results

3-year biochemical non-evidence of disease (BNED) was 71%. PSA doubling time lower than 4 months (p = 0.01) and time from recurrence to salvage EBRT (p = 0.04) were associated with worse chance of biochemical control. Biochemical control of 76% was achieved when RT had been introduced with a PSA lower than 1 ng/ml vs. 48% with a PSA higher than 1 (p = 0.19). Late toxicity was acceptable.

Conclusion

70% of biochemical control in 3 years can be achieved with salvage radiotherapy in selected patients. The importance of PSADT was confirmed in this study and radiotherapy should be started as early as possible. Longer follow up is necessary, but it is possible to conclude that a long interval free from hormonal therapy was achieved with low rate of toxicity avoiding or at least delaying several important adverse effects related to hormonal treatment.

Management of biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy: salvage radiotherapy - a case series

A retrospective analysis of the outcome of radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer in a single centre and assessment of the role of salvage radiotherapy (RT) for patients with biochemical relapse. Hundred and thirty-seven patients underwent RP for adenocarcinoma of the prostate in our centre between December 1994 and June 2003. Fifty-four of these patients developed a biochemical relapse prostate-specific antigen (PSA > or = 0.2 ng/ml). Thirty-two patients including five from elsewhere (one with a palpable local recurrence) received salvage RT. Twenty-five of these had positive margins at resection and four had involvement of seminal vesicles. Nine had Gleason score > or = 8. Median PSA before RT was 0.55 ng/ml (range 0.2-5.0). Median age at surgery was 63.5 years (range 52-71). Median age at RT was 65 years (range 53-73). Median time from surgery to biochemical relapse was 11 months (range 0-37) and median interval from surgery to RT was 22 months (range 3-71). Twenty-seven patients received 64 Gy in 32 fractions, three patients received 55 Gy in 20 fractions and two patients received 50 Gy in 20 fractions. Twenty-seven patients were managed by observation or hormone therapy. Twenty-seven patients (84%) achieved complete biochemical remission following RT. Eighteen (56%) remain in complete remission with a median follow-up since RT for the whole group of 30 months (range 8-85). Fourteen patients have relapsed, eight of whom had either clear margins or PSA >1.0 ng/ml at the time of RT (PSA > or = 0.2 ng/ml). Salvage RT is an effective treatment for achieving biochemical remission in selected patients who relapse following RP.

Long-term results and predictive factors of three-dimensional conformal salvage radiotherapy for biochemical relapse after prostatectomy

PURPOSE

Salvage radiotherapy (RT) is used to treat patients with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy (RP). Although retrospective series have demonstrated that salvage RT will result in biochemical response in approximately 75% of patients, long-term response is much lower (20-40%). The purpose of this study was to determine prognostic factors related to the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) outcome after salvage RT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1991 and 2004, 171 patients received salvage RT at the University of Heidelberg. Patient age, margin status, Gleason score, tumor grading, pathologic tumor stage, pre-RP and pre-RT PSA levels, and time from RP to rise of PSA were analyzed.

RESULTS

Median follow-up time was 39 months. The 5-year overall and clinical relapse-free survival were 93.8% and 80.8%, respectively. After RT serum PSA decreased in 141 patients (82.5%). The 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival was 35.1%. Univariate analysis showed following statistically significant predictors of PSA recurrence after RT: preoperative PSA level (p = 0.035), pathologic tumor classification (p = 0.001), Gleason score (p < 0.001), tumor grading (p = 0.004), and pre-RT PSA level (p = 0.031). On multivariate analysis, only Gleason score (p = 0.047) and pre-RT PSA level (p = 0.049) were found to be independently predictive of PSA recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

This study represents one of the largest retrospective studies analyzing the outcome of patients treated with salvage RT at a single institution. Our findings suggest that patients with Gleason score <7 and low pre-RT PSA levels are the best candidates for salvage RT, whereas patients with high-grade lesions should be considered for additional treatment (e.g., hormonal therapy).

Management of the Patient with a Rising PSA Alone

PSA-only recurrence after definitive RP or RT for PCA is an increasingly com-mon scenario. The very definition of advanced prostate cancer is changing. Multimodal therapy improves cancer-specific outcomes especially in men with high-risk disease. After RP, a detectable serum PSA has been considered suggestive of PCA recurrence. After RT, the ASTRO definition of BCR has been widely used to define BCR. Both of these definitions of BCR are subject to dispute. The kinetics of a rising PSA (PSA doubling time) appears to be the best surrogate marker for disease risk, clinical progression, and ultimately cancer-specific death. Therapeutic options include salvage RT after primary RP or systemic HT through surgical/chemical castration, antiandrogens, or nontraditional HT. Re-cent studies suggest that early HT can provide modest survival benefits, but at both an economic cost and decreased quality of life. The diminished side effects of an oral antiandrogen are appealing, and may be as efficacious as castration therapies in low-volume disease. More clinical trials are needed to determine the best treatments, alone and in combination. The potential opportunities for novel therapeutic agents with low associated morbidity are great.

Salvage conformal radiotherapy for biochemical recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVE

Assess the results of salvage conformal radiotherapy in patients with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and identify prognostic factors for biochemical recurrence and toxicity of the treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From June 1998 to November 2001, 35 patients were submitted to conformal radiotherapy for PSA > or = 0.2 ng/mL in progression after radical prostatectomy and were retrospectively analyzed. The mean dose of radiation in prostatic bed was of 77.4 Gy (68-81). Variables related to the treatment and to tumor were assessed to identify prognostic factors for biochemical recurrence after salvage radiotherapy.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was of 55 months (17-83). The actuarial survival rates free of biochemical recurrence and free of metastasis at a distance of 5 years were 79.7% e 84.7%, respectively. The actuarial global survival rate in 5 years was 96.1%. The actuarial survival rate free of biochemical recurrence in 5 years was 83.3% with PSA pre-radiotherapy < or = 1, 100% when > 1 and < or = 2, and 57.1% when > 2 (p = 0.023). Dose > 70 Gy in 30% of the bladder volume implied in more acute urinary toxicity (p = 0.035). The mean time for the development of late urinary toxicity was 21 months (12-51). Dose > 55 Gy in 50%bladder volume implied in more late urinary toxicity (p = 0.018). A patient presented late rectal toxicity of 2nd grade.

CONCLUSIONS

Conformal radiotherapy showed to be effective for the control of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Patients with pre-therapy PSA < or = 2 ng/mL have more biochemical control.

Conduite à tenir devant une ascension du PSA après rémission complète postprostatectomie ?

Between twenty and to forty percent of patients will develop an isolated PSA failure after a radical prostatectomy. Pelvic irradiation is a therapeutic option with curative intention. It is the best therapeutic option for young people with good prognostic factors. Combined radiation with hormonal or chemotherapy should be evaluated in patients with poor prognostic factors. For patients with a short life expectancy, hormonotherapy or a watch and see policy are acceptable options.

Biochemical Recurrence after Localized Treatment

The quoted incidence of biochemical recurrence (BCR) after localized treatment varies significantly and depends on numerous well-known prognostic factors; however, it likely occurs in at least 30%-40% of patients who receive localized treatment. Because the clinical significance of BCR is often unclear, and depends in many cases on unknown factors, it is difficult to select the best treatment and determine when best to institute that therapy. This review examines some of the issues associated with BCR and attempts to shed some light on this common but controversial clinical scenario. Some treatment strategies discussed in this article include salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy, salvage therapy after radiotherapy, and hormonal therapy.

The value of radiotherapy in treating recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy

Approximately 25-40% of men who undergo radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer will experience biochemical recurrence. A rapid prostate-specific antigen (PSA) doubling time or high-grade disease are risk factors for progression to bone metastases and cancer-specific mortality. Salvage external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to the prostate fossa is the only curative therapy for patients with biochemical recurrence after RRP, but it is used relatively infrequently to treat recurrent prostate cancer because of a widespread perception that most patients have systemic recurrence, and its reported lack of efficacy for high-risk disease. However, in a large, multicenter study of patients who received salvage EBRT for a rising PSA level after RRP, a substantial proportion of patients with high-grade disease and/or a rapid PSA doubling time were observed to have a favorable outcome after salvage EBRT if it was administered at low PSA values. This suggests that salvage EBRT could provide long-term cancer control for patients at the highest risk of progression to bone metastases and cancer-specific mortality. A nomogram that predicts the 3-year progression-free probability after salvage EBRT has been developed to facilitate the selection of patients for this potentially curative therapy. In the absence of other curative therapies, all patients with recurrent prostate cancer should be considered for salvage EBRT, particularly those with positive surgical margins. To be successful, salvage EBRT should be administered at the earliest evidence of recurrent disease, once a rising PSA trend as been confirmed.

Salvage radiation therapy for prostate specific antigen progression following radical prostatectomy: 10-year outcome estimates

PURPOSE

We evaluated men treated with salvage radiation therapy for increasing serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) following radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 3,478 consecutive men who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) between 1983 and 2003, as performed by a single surgeon. A total of 307 men received salvage radiation therapy for persistently increased or increasing PSA after RRP. We compared perioperative and peri-radiotherapy clinicopathological parameters in men who achieved an undetectable PSA level after radiation therapy (responders) vs those who did not (nonresponders). We then evaluated the durability of the PSA response.

RESULTS

Median time from RRP to PSA progression was 23 months (range 1 to 129). Median followup from RRP was 104 months (range 7 to 225). Median followup from salvage radiotherapy was 56 months (range 0 to 188). Of 223 men with sufficient followup information 162 (73%) subsequently had undetectable PSA (less than 0.3 ng/ml) in response to salvage radiation therapy. There was no significant difference between responders and nonresponders in the distribution of clinical and pathological tumor stages, age at RRP, surgical margin status, and the interval between RRP and salvage radiation therapy. A Gleason score of 8 to 10 was more prevalent in nonresponders than responders (28% vs 13%). Median PSA at salvage radiation therapy was 1.2 ng/ml in nonresponders vs 0.7 ng/ml in responders. Actuarial 5 and 10-year progression-free (PSA less than 0.3 ng/ml) survival probabilities in all 223 men following salvage radiation therapy were 40% (95% CI 32 to 48) and 25% (95% CI 15 to 36), respectively. Actuarial 5 and 10-year biochemical progression-free survival estimates following salvage radiation therapy in responders only were 55% (95% CI 45 to 64) and 35% (95% CI 21 to 49), respectively. Only seminal vesicle invasion was significantly associated with progression-free survival following radiation therapy on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

An undetectable PSA level following salvage radiation therapy is more frequently achieved in men with lower pre-radiation serum PSA and those without seminal vesicle or lymph node involvement. Overall approximately a fourth of men with PSA evidence of cancer progression following RRP had a durable response 10 years after the initiation of salvage radiation therapy in the protocols used in this patient cohort.

Outcome of salvage radiotherapy for biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy with or without hormonal therapy

BACKGROUND

This study analyzed the outcome of salvage radiotherapy for biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy (RP). By comparing the outcomes for patients who received RT alone and for those who received combined RT and hormonal therapy, we assessed the potential benefits of hormonal therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This cohort was comprised of 101 patients who received salvage RT between 1990 and 2001 for biochemical failure after RP. Fifty-nine of these patients also received hormone. Margin status (positive vs. negative), extracapsular extension (yes vs. no), seminal vesicle involvement (yes vs. no), pathologic stage, Gleason score, pre-RP PSA, post-RP PSA, pre-RT PSA, hormonal use, radiotherapy dose and technique, RP at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, and time from RP to salvage RT were analyzed. Statistically significant variables were used to construct prognostic groups.

RESULTS

Independent prognostic factors for the RT-alone group were margin status and pre-RT PSA. RP at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center was marginally significant (p = 0.06) in multivariate analysis. Pre-RT PSA was the only significant prognostic factor for the combined-therapy group. We used a combination of margin status and pre-RT PSA to construct a prognostic model for response to the salvage treatment based on the RT group. We identified the favorable group as those patients with positive margin and pre-RT PSA < or = 0.5 ng/mL vs. the unfavorable group as otherwise. This stratification separates patients into clinically meaningful groups. The 5-year PSA control probabilities for the favorable vs. the unfavorable group were 83.7% vs. 61.7% with radiotherapy alone (p = 0.03). Androgen ablation seemed to be most beneficial in the unfavorable group.

CONCLUSION

After prostatectomy, favorable-group patients may fare well with salvage radiotherapy alone. These patients may be spared the toxicity of androgen ablation. The other patients may benefit most from a combined approach with hormonal treatment. We further suggest that salvage radiotherapy should be given early when the PSA is still low.

Salvage radiotherapy for men with isolated rising PSA or locally palpable recurrence after radical prostatectomy: do outcomes differ?

OBJECTIVES

To compare, in a retrospective analysis, the outcome of salvage external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for isolated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) elevation or palpable local recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP).

METHODS

We evaluated 102 men who underwent EBRT from 1993 to 1999, 60 for a rising PSA level alone and 42 for palpable local disease after RP. Biochemical disease-free survival and overall survival were calculated. Prognostic factors were evaluated to determine associations with biochemical disease-free survival.

RESULTS

The 5-year rate of biochemical disease-free survival, local control, freedom from distant metastasis, and overall survival for all 102 patients was 38%, 94%, 87%, and 88%, respectively. All palpable disease resolved completely after salvage EBRT. The greatest 5-year rate of biochemical control (69%) was obtained in patients with a pre-EBRT PSA level of 0.5 ng/mL or less. The 5-year overall survival rate was significantly better for those who underwent salvage EBRT for a rising PSA level than for those with palpable recurrence (96% versus 78%, P = 0.02). A low pre-EBRT PSA level and a less than 2-year interval from RP to EBRT were independent predictors of biochemical failure. Five patients (5%) experienced chronic grade 3 or 4 RT-related toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage EBRT provides excellent local control of recurrent disease after RP. Salvage EBRT before the development of palpable local disease may confer a survival benefit and decrease the risk of metastasis, and durable biochemical control was achieved best in those whose pre-EBRT PSA level was 0.5 ng/mL or less. Early referral and careful patient selection is vital for salvage EBRT to be of optimal benefit.

GEC/ESTRO-EAU recommendations on temporary brachytherapy using stepping sources for localised prostate cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The aim of this paper is to present the GEC/ESTRO-EAU recommendations for template and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided transperineal temporary interstitial prostate brachytherapy using a high dose rate iridium-192 stepping source and a remote afterloading technique. Experts in prostate brachytherapy developed these recommendations on behalf of the GEC/ESTRO and of the EAU. The paper has been approved by both GEC/ESTRO steering committee members and EAU committee members.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Interstitial brachytherapy (BT) to organ confined prostate cancer can be applied as a boost treatment in combination with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) using a proper number of BT fractions in curative intent. Temporary transperineal BT alone or in combination with EBRT are feasible as a palliative/salvage treatment modality because of local recurrence, however, without large clinical experience. The use of temporary BT as a monotherapy is subject of ongoing clinical research.

RESULTS

Recommendations for pre-treatment investigations, patient selection, equipment and facilities, the clinical team, the implant procedure (treatment planning and needle implantation) dose and fractionation, reporting, management of side effects and follow-up are given.

CONCLUSIONS

These recommendations are intended to be technically and advisory in nature, but the ultimate responsibility for the medical decision rests with the treating physician. Although, this paper represents the consensus of an interdisciplinary group of experts, TRUS and template guided temporary transperineal interstitial implants in prostate cancer are a constantly evolving field and the recommendations are subject to modifications as new data become available.

Evaluation and Management of Prostate-specific Antigen Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer

A radical prostatectomy has been established as one of the standard management options for localized prostate cancer. However, a substantial proportion of patients who undergo a radical prostatectomy develop prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence which is commonly defined as a PSA cut-off point value of 0.2 ng/ml. Although the management of PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy may depend on the site of recurrence, it is quite difficult to identify the recurrent lesion accurately based on the currently available imaging technology. Patients who have surgical margin involvement or a Gleason score < or =7 based on the radical prostatectomy specimens, who do not have nodal or seminal vesicle involvement, and who develop a PSA recurrence >1-2 years after surgery with a doubling time of >1 year, and whose pre-treatment PSA is < 1.0-1.5 ng/ml are considered to benefit from local treatment with at least 64 Gy of salvage radiotherapy. Patients with different characteristics are considered to have distant metastases or both local lesions and distant metastases, and thus may be candidates for hormonal manipulation rather than radiotherapy. Since local recurrent lesions are considered to be quite small at the early stage of PSA recurrence, hormonal manipulation may be sufficient to prevent disease progression instead of radiotherapy. However, the optimal type and timing of hormonal manipulation remain to be elucidated. As a result, no consensus regarding the treatment for PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy has yet been reached.

Treating the Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Definitive Primary Therapy

As increasing numbers of men are living longer with prostate cancer, larger proportions will eventually present to our collective practices with increasing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. Such PSA relapses, conservatively estimated to affect approximately 50,000 men each year, have become the most common form of advanced prostate cancer. Salvage radiation therapy and salvage prostatectomy have important roles in our therapeutic armamentarium and should be valid options for young, healthy men. Counseling patients regarding expectations for cancer control and treatment morbidity has become better because of reports from larger series of patients who have had salvage radiation therapy and surgery. Some patients may not be appropriate candidates for salvage local therapies. A growing body of evidence suggests early hormonal therapy improves progression-free survival (PFS) and could alter cancer-specific survival. This benefit seems to be greatest when hormonal therapy is initiated while PSA levels are low, before clinically measurable disease becomes apparent. However, there is a cost to be paid in side effects and health care dollars when androgen deprivation is administered over prolonged periods. The nonsteroidal antiandrogen agent bicalutamide could offer PFS equivalent to that seen with castration without the complications of androgen deprivation. Observational data seem to indicate that individuals at high risk could also receive benefit from therapy administered before PSA detection. The potential opportunities for novel therapeutic agents with low associated morbidity are great.

Prostate-specific antigen velocity accurately predicts response to salvage radiotherapy in men with biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether prostate-specific antigen (PSA) velocity (PSAV), used as a selection criterion for salvage radiotherapy (RT) after radical prostatectomy (RP), predicts the likelihood of response to RT in men with biochemical relapse.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 48 patients who had undergone salvage RT for biochemical relapse after RP. All men were followed up with serial PSA measurements for a minimum of 6 months from their initial PSA recurrence, and RT was only offered to those patients with a serum PSA level remaining at less than 1.0 ng/mL. The response to RT was defined as maintenance of a PSA level of less than 0.1 ng/mL. The pathologic and clinical parameters, including PSAV, were examined to determine their individual ability to predict the response to RT.

RESULTS

Of the 48 patients, 30 had maintained a PSA level of less than 0.1 ng/mL at a median follow-up of 16 months. The PSAV was strongly predictive of the likelihood of a response to salvage RT. The median relapse-free survival time for patients with a PSAV of less than 0.035 ng/mL/mo was 28 months compared with 16 months for patients with a PSAV greater than 0.035 ng/mL/mo. All other parameters tested, including Gleason score, seminal vesicle invasion, extracapsular extension, and margin status, were not predictive of the likelihood of a response to RT.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, PSAV accurately predicted the likelihood of response to salvage RT in men with biochemical relapse after RP. No other pathologic parameters predicted the likelihood of response to RT. Using PSAV as a sole selection criterion for salvage RT after RP may allow improvement in the historically low rates of durable response.

Rising prostate-specific antigen after primary prostate cancer therapy

An estimated 20-40% of men experience a biochemical recurrence within 10 years of definitive prostate cancer treatment. No single prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value is invariably associated with clinical metastasis or cancer-specific survival; PSA kinetics might prove to be a more important predictor of eventual progression-free survival and cancer-specific survival than absolute PSA level alone. With only one-third of patients progressing from biochemical recurrence to clinical disease, therapeutic morbidity should not outpace risk of disease progression. Salvage radiation therapy following radical prostatectomy has widely variable long-term biochemical control rates (from 18 to 64% depending on the follow-up period). Early hormonal therapy delivered as castration or complete androgen blockade might delay clinical metastasis in patients with high-risk pathologic disease; however, the adverse effects and morbidity of long-term therapy must not be underestimated. Non-steroidal antiandrogens as monotherapy for early biochemical recurrence, particularly for younger men who wish to preserve their libido and sexual potency, have received considerable attention, but there are conflicting data on long-term outcomes. Because of their favorable adverse-effect profiles, non-traditional therapies that exert localized hormonal or cellular effects are receiving considerable attention for treatment of early, PSA-only recurrence. Data from animal models provide a rationale for the use of these therapies, but there is a lack of evidence to support prolongation of progression-free survival or cancer-specific survival.

Improved biochemical outcome with adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer with poor pathologic features

PURPOSE

The indications for adjuvant external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) after radical prostatectomy (RP) are poorly defined. We performed a retrospective comparison of our institution's experience treating prostate cancer with RP vs. RP followed by adjuvant EBRT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1987 and 1998, 617 patients with clinical Stage T1-T2N0M0 prostate cancer underwent RP. Patients who underwent preoperative androgen deprivation and those with positive lymph nodes were excluded. Of the 617 patients, 34 (5.5%) with an undetectable postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level underwent adjuvant prostatic fossa RT at a median of 0.25 year (range, 0.1-0.6) postoperatively because of poor pathologic features. The median total dose was 59.4 Gy (range, 50.4-66.6 Gy) in 1.8-2.0-Gy fractions. These 34 RP+RT patients were compared with the remaining 583 RP patients. Biochemical failure was defined as any postoperative PSA level > or =0.1 ng/mL and any postoperative PSA level > or =0.3 ng/mL (at least 30 days after surgery). Administration of androgen deprivation was also scored as biochemical failure when applying either definition. The median clinical follow-up was 8.2 years (range, 0.1-11.2 years) for RP and 8.4 years (range, 0.3-13.8 years) for RP+RT.

RESULTS

Radical prostatectomy + radiation therapy patients had a greater pathologic Gleason score (mean, 7.3 vs. 6.5; p < 0.01) and pathologic T stage (median, T3a vs. T2c; p < 0.01). Age (median, 65.7 years) and pretreatment PSA level (median, 7.9 ng/mL) were similar between the treatment groups. Extracapsular extension was present in 72% of RP+RT patients vs. 27% of RP patients (p < 0.01). The RP+RT patients were more likely to have seminal vesicle invasion (29% vs. 9%, p < 0.01) and positive margins (73% vs. 36%, p < 0.01). Despite these poor pathologic features, the 5-year biochemical control (BC) rate (PSA <0.1 ng/mL) was 57% for RP+RT and 47% for RP (p = 0.28). For patients with extracapsular extension, the 5-year BC rate was 52% for RP+RT vs. 30% for RP (p < 0.01). The 5-year BC rate for patients with seminal vesicle invasion was 60% for RP+RT vs. 18% for RP (p < 0.01). For those with positive margins, the 5-year BC rate was 64% for RP+RT vs. 27% for RP (p < 0.01). The use of adjuvant RT remained statistically significant on multivariate analysis when applying either biochemical failure definition. Adjuvant RT also remained statistically significant when including the postoperative PSA level (>30 days after surgery) in the multivariate analyses. In addition, 99 (17%) of the 583 RP patients required salvage prostatic fossa RT (median dose, 59.4 Gy) at a median interval of 1.3 years after surgery (range, 0.1-8.4) for a palpable recurrence (n = 10) or a detectable/rising postoperative PSA level (n = 89). The median PSA level before salvage RT was 0.8 ng/mL (mean, 3.2 ng/mL). The 5-year and 8-year BC rate, using the PSA <0.1 ng/mL definition, from the date of salvage RT was 41% and 35%, respectively. The 5-year and 8-year BC rate, using the PSA <0.3 ng/mL definition, was 46% and 36%, respectively. The 8-year local recurrence rate after salvage RT was 4%.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant RT demonstrated improved efficacy against prostate cancer. For patients with poor pathologic features (extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, positive margins), adjuvant RT improved the biochemical outcome independent of other prognostic factors.

Management of recurrent disease after radical prostatectomy

Prostate cancer has undergone a stage migration since the advent of widespread PSA testing, yet still a significant number of men develop PSA recurrence following radical prostatectomy. This causes anxiety to the patient and the urologist. This review examines the clinical significance of biochemical relapse and the role of imaging modalities and anastomotic biopsies. The importance of the radical prostatectomy pathological features and the PSA kinetics in determining the site of recurrence and the best treatment modality is emphasised. The optimal timing and dose of salvage radiotherapy and the role of hormonal therapy is discussed.

Limited efficacy of salvage radiotherapy for biopsy confirmed or clinically palpable local recurrence of prostate carcinoma after surgery

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy of salvage radiotherapy (RT) for biopsy confirmed or clinically palpable local recurrence of prostate adenocarcinoma after radical prostatectomy (RP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 44 patients treated with salvage RT for biopsy confirmed or clinically palpable local recurrence between 1991 and 2000. Thirty-six had positive biopsy for local recurrence and the rest without histological confirmation had clinically palpable disease. All had rising PSA at the time of RT (median: 3.7). Median interval from RP to RT was 2.6 years. Thirty-six received salvage RT alone, while eight had a short course (<4 months) of androgen ablation prior to RT. RT doses were 60-66Gy in 30-33 fractions. Freedom from PSA failure was defined as the maintenance of PSA<or=0.2.

RESULTS

Median follow-ups from RP and salvage RT were 8.7 and 5.5 years, respectively. All but one achieved local control clinically. The actuarial PSA relapse-free and survival rate at 5 years were 11 and 87%, respectively. On Cox regression analysis, significant predictors for relapse were PSA level prior to salvage RT, and Gleason score.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of salvage RT alone for local recurrence was limited. This study suggests a need to explore other strategies incorporating systemic therapy, and the importance of timely referral for consideration of salvage RT in patients with rising PSA after surgery.

Hypofractionated radiotherapy as salvage for rising prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy

AIMS

To review the outcome of men receiving hypofractionated salvage radiotherapy for rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after radical prostatectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 61 men referred for salvage radiotherapy for biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy was conducted. Twenty-four men receiving hormonal therapy or with follow-up of less than 12 months were excluded. Thirty-seven men were identified, median age 64 years, median preoperative PSA 11 ng/ml (5.6-60 ng/ml), Gleason scores <7: 70%, Gleason scores > or = 7: 30%. Twenty-seven men had positive surgical resection margins, eight had seminal-vesicle involvement and one had lymph-node involvement. Diagnosis of failure after radical prostatectomy was made on rising PSA in all cases; 19 men also had positive magnetic resonance imaging, 11 abnormal digital rectal examination and nine positive biopsy. Radiotherapy was delivered conformally to the prostatic fossa, 50-52.5 Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks. Date of failure after radiotherapy was defined by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) consensus criteria or as date of commencement of hormonal therapy for rising PSA.

RESULTS

Median time from radical prostatectomy to radiotherapy was 30.6 months (8-68 months); median pre-radiotherapy PSA was 2.9 ng/ml (0.5-11.4 ng/ml). PSA response after radiotherapy was seen in 33 out of 37 (89%) patients. At median follow-up of 36 months (20-85 months), 28 out of 37 remained disease-free. Thirteen more patients have had two consecutive PSA rises. Actuarial 3-year disease-free survival is 74%. No patient has developed metastases or died of prostate cancer. Pre-radiotherapy PSA less than 2 ng/ml predicted disease-free survival (P = 0.027). No acute toxicity greater than Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) G2 was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy achieved durable biochemical control in most patients. Outcome is improved if radiotherapy is delivered when PSA is less than 2 ng/ml. A policy of close monitoring after radical prostatectomy with early referral for salvage radiotherapy is advocated.

Long-term outcome of patients with prostate cancer and pathologic seminal vesicle invasion (pT3b): effect of adjuvant radiotherapy

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the long-term outcome of patients with prostate cancer who have pathologic seminal vesicle invasion without lymph node metastasis (pT3bN0M0) and compare management strategies.

METHODS

From October 1987 to August of 1997, 43 men underwent radical prostatectomy at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, had pT3bN0M0 disease, complete preoperative and postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) data, and a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Eighteen patients with undetectable postoperative PSA levels received adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) within 6 months of surgery. Twelve patients with undetectable PSA levels postoperatively were considered for salvage treatment at biochemical progression. Thirteen patients with persistently elevated PSA levels postoperatively underwent immediate salvage RT. We evaluated the prognostic factors for freedom from biochemical failure (bNED), distant metastasis (DM), disease-specific survival, and overall survival.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 5.9 years (range 2 to 10). Patients who received adjuvant RT had significantly greater 5-year bNED survival than patients who did not (80% versus 8%, P <0.001) and increased freedom from DM that was of borderline significance (P = 0.05). The 5-year survival estimates for DM were 0% for the adjuvant RT versus 17% for the observed patient group. In patients with undetectable postoperative PSA levels, the preoperative PSA level was an independent prognostic factor for later disease progression. Patients with a preoperative PSA level of less than 20 ng/mL showed significantly greater 5-year bNED survival than those with a preoperative PSA level of 20 ng/mL or greater (56% versus 32%, P <0.05). The survival curves for risk of DM and death from prostate cancer for those two patient groups were not significantly different statistically.

CONCLUSIONS

Although pathologic seminal vesicle invasion has been associated with poor prognosis and high DM risk, adjuvant RT may result in improved bNED survival in patients with undetectable PSA levels after radical prostatectomy. The effect on clinical outcome awaits additional follow-up.