Integral Photodynamic Treatment of Refractory Superficial Bladder Cancer

The use of photodynamic therapy in medical practice

Cancer therapy, especially for tumors near sensitive areas, demands precise treatment. This review explores photodynamic therapy (PDT), a method leveraging photosensitizers (PS), specific wavelength light, and oxygen to target cancer effectively. Recent advancements affirm PDT's efficacy, utilizing ROS generation to induce cancer cell death. With a history spanning over decades, PDT's dynamic evolution has expanded its application across dermatology, oncology, and dentistry. This review aims to dissect PDT's principles, from its inception to contemporary medical applications, highlighting its role in modern cancer treatment strategies.

Photodynamic Therapy: Current Trends and Potential Future Role in the Treatment of Bladder Cancer

Bladder cancer (BC) is the 10th most common cancer in the world. The therapeutic spectrum of BC is broad and is constantly expanding. Despite the wide clinical use of photodynamic diagnosis (PTD) for BC, PDT has not been sufficiently investigated in the treatment landscape of BC. We performed an online search of the PubMed database using these keywords: photodynamic therapy, bladder cancer, urothelial carcinoma, in vivo, in vitro, cell line, animal model. Reviews, case reports, and articles devoted to photodynamic diagnostics and the photodynamic therapy of tumors other than urothelial carcinoma were excluded. Of a total of 695 publications, we selected 20 articles with clinical data, 34 articles on in vivo PDT, and 106 articles on in vitro data. The results presented in animal models highlight the potential use of PDT in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting to reduce local recurrence in the bladder and upper urinary tracts. Possible regimens include the combination of PDT with intravesical chemotherapy for improved local tumor control or the integration of vascular-targeted PDT in combination with modern systemic drugs in order to boost local response. We summarize available evidence on the preclinical and clinical application of PDT for urothelial carcinoma in order to explain the current trends and future perspectives.

Efficacy and safety of photodynamic therapy for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a promising treatment for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), we conducted this systematic review to comprehensively assess its efficacy and safety.

Methods

A comprehensive literature research was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, and studies reporting the safety and efficacy of PDT in NMIBC were included. Complete response (CR) rates, recurrence-free survival (RFS) at different time points, and complication incidences were extracted and synthesized. Pooled results were presented as rates with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI).

Results

Overall, 28 single arm studies were included in the meta-analysis. For unresectable NMIBC, therapeutic PDT achieved CR in 68% (95% CI: 59%-77%) of patients. Among these CR cases, 71% (95% CI: 56%-85%) and 38% (95% CI: 12%-64%) have a RFS longer than 12 and 24 months, respectively. For Tis patients, the CR rate was 68% (95% CI: 56%-80%), and 84% (95% CI: 48%-100%) and 13% (95% CI: 1%-32%) have a RFS longer than 12 and 24 months. For patients with resectable tumors, post-resection adjuvant PDT could provide a 12 and 24 months RFS in 81% (95% CI:76%-87%) and 56% (95% CI:41%-71%) of them. Especially, for NMIBC patients who failed BCG therapy, adjuvant PDT could still achieve a 1-year and 2-year RFS in 68% (95% CI:51%-86%) and 56% (95% CI:32%-81%) patients. The complications were mostly mild and transient, including lower urinary tract symptoms and photosensitivity.

Conclusion

Both therapeutic and adjuvant PDT present satisfying safety and efficacy for NMIBC, including these cases that are resistant to the standard of care. As a promising option for NMIBC, PDT deserves further exploration by future high-quality research.

Systematic review registration

https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2022-11-0043/, INPLASY2022110043.

Photofrin photodynamic therapy: 2.0 mg/kg or not 2.0 mg/kg that is the question

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an innovative minimally invasive therapy that has great potential for both tumor ablation and normal tissue preservation. However, while in recent years the standards of surgery, radiation and chemotherapy have dramatically improved in terms of outcomes and morbidity, the same cannot be said of PDT in general and Photofrin((R))-based PDT in particular. As currently practiced PDT dosimetry has not really improved tumor ablation and diminished side effects over reports from two decades ago. We critically examine the clinical variables available for PDT dosimetry and conclude that the simple maneuver of diminishing drug dose, with an appropriate increase in light dose, can enhance disease control with a significantly lower risk of morbidity. This conclusion should also be applicable to most systemically introduced photosensitizer.

Hexyl-aminolevulinate-mediated photodynamic therapy: How to spare normal urothelium. An in vitro approach

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) of superficial bladder cancer may cause damages to the normal surrounding bladder wall. Prevention of these is important for bladder healing. We studied the influence of photosensitizer concentration, irradiation parameters, and production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) on the photodynamically induced damage in the porcine urothelium invitro. The aim was to determine the threshold conditions for the cell survival.

METHODS

Living porcine bladder mucosae were incubated with solution of hexylester of 5-aminolevulinic acid (HAL). The mucosae were irradiated with increasing doses and cell alterations were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy and by Sytox green fluorescence. The urothelial survival score was correlated with Protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) photobleaching and intracellular fluorescence of Rhodamine 123 reflecting the ROS production.

RESULTS

The mortality ratio was dependent on PpIX concentration. After 3 hours of incubation, the threshold radiant exposures for blue light were 0.15 and 0.75 J/cm(2) (irradiance 30 and 75 mW/cm(2), respectively) and for white light 0.55 J/cm(2) (irradiance 30 mW/cm(2)). Photobleaching rate increased with decreasing irradiance. Interestingly, the DHR123/R123 reporter system correlated well with the threshold exposures under all conditions used.

CONCLUSIONS

We have determined radiant exposures sparing half of normal urothelial cells. We propose that the use of low irradiance combined with systems reporting the ROS production in the irradiated tissue could improve the in vivo dosimetry and optimize the PDT.

Whole bladder wall photodynamic therapy of transitional cell carcinoma rat bladder tumors using intravesically administered hypericin

Whole-bladder wall photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a promising treatment for carcinoma in situ (CIS) and diffuse premalignant changes of the bladder. After the results of our clinical studies showing that intravesical hypericin selectively accumulates in superficial bladder tumors, we investigated the hypericin-PDT efficacy in an AY-27 orthotopic transitional cell carcinoma rat bladder tumor model. After the instillation of hypericin (30 microM, 2 hr) in the bladder, tumors were irradiated (25-50 mW/cm 6-48 J/cm(2)) using 595 nm laser light. Data demonstrate that light doses of 12-48 J/cm(2) resulted in selective PDT-induced urothelial tumor damage without damaging detrusor musculature. Histological assessment of bladder sections 2 days after PDT showed tumor destruction, with tumor cells shrinking and detaching from the bladder wall. There were tumor regrowth 1-3 weeks after treatment. The in vivo/in vitro clonogenic assay results revealed up to 98% of tumor cell kill by hypericin PDT. In conclusion, hypericin PDT can be used to safely induce a selective urothelial tumor damage without damaging detrusor musculature, when optimum hypericin concentration and light fluences are used. A small percentage (2-5%) of tumor cells that survive the photodynamic treatment resulting in tumor regrowth after a prolonged period of time is likely due to oxygen depletion during light irradiation.

Photodynamic therapy: a new approach to prostate cancer

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is based on the concept that light irradiation can change an inert substance into an active one. In urology, hematoporphyrin derivative (HpD) and Photofrin (Axcan Scandipharm Inc., Birmingham, AL) are used most commonly as photosensitizing agents predominantly for the treatment of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. To investigate the basics for PDT of prostate cancer, several studies were performed on the optical characteristics of prostate tissue and prostate carcinoma tissue in vitro and in vivo and on the penetration depths of different laser wavelengths. Initial experimental studies to treat prostate cancer with PDT using HpD were done on Dunning tumors in rats. Combined with interstitial applicators, photodynamic therapy seems to have a great potential in the treatment of prostate carcinoma. However, it is an experimental treatment and even a preliminary evaluation will be possible only after the conclusion of clinical studies with the corresponding long-term results.

Whole bladder photodynamic therapy with 5-aminolevulinic acid using a white light source

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether whole bladder photodynamic therapy after intravesical administration of 5-aminolevulinic acid using a white light source would destroy urothelial carcinoma. We sought to define the optimal target group of patients for this therapy. The side effects of treatment were also assessed.

METHODS

We performed whole bladder photodynamic therapy with 100 J/cm(2) white light 2 to 4.5 hours after intravesical administration of 17% 5-aminolevulinic acid in 12 patients with recurring, multifocal, Stage pTa, grade I to III, urothelial tumors of the bladder and carcinoma in situ.

RESULTS

Immediately after whole bladder irradiation, histologic examination of biopsies taken from flat suspicious lesions showed no viable cells; remnants of malignant cells were found in papillary tumors. Of the 12 patients, 11 returned for follow-up examination. At a median follow-up of 18 months (range 3 to 25), 3 of the 7 patients with carcinoma in situ and 2 of the 4 patients with papillary tumors were free of disease. In all patients, urinary frequency and urgency subsided within 3 weeks. No decreased bladder capacity or systemic side effects were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary data show that whole bladder photodynamic therapy with intravesically applied 5-aminolevulinic acid using a white light source is effective in destroying flat malignant lesions of the bladder such as carcinoma in situ. The procedure is easy to perform and is not associated with any major side effects. The findings warrant long-term and multicenter studies.

Photodynamic therapy for superficial bladder cancer under local anaesthetic

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the use of local anaesthesia (LA) in 5-aminolaevulinic acid (ALA) photodynamic therapy (PDT) for superficial transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder, and to provide further toxicity and tolerability data on this new method within the context of a phase 1 trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

ALA PDT was administered to 19 patients with recurrent superficial TCC (stage Ta/carcinoma in situ, grades 1-3) using escalating doses of ALA (3-6%) and 633 nm laser light (25-50 J/cm2) under various LA (lignocaine) protocols. Pain was assessed using a linear analogue scale from 0 to 10. The endpoints of tolerability and toxicity were assessed for the different LA, light and ALA doses, with lignocaine levels.

RESULTS

ALA PDT is painful and requires some form of anaesthesia. The discomfort was immediate, associated with bladder spasm, and was a function of the ALA concentration rather than the total light dose given. Simple passive diffusion (PD) of 2% lignocaine instilled for 40 min before PDT gave adequate anaesthesia with 3% ALA (n=8; median pain score 1, range 0-2). With 6% ALA the pain was dramatically increased using PD (n=6; median pain score 8, range 5-10) and therefore the more potent LA technique of electromotive drug administration (EMDA) of 2% lignocaine was used, with excellent results (n=3; median pain score 1, range 0-2). All patients had transient bladder irritability that typically lasted 9-12 days, with no subjective/objective change in long-term bladder function. No other toxicity was reported. Serum lignocaine levels were minimal.

CONCLUSION

Bladder ALA PDT is both safe and feasible under LA. At a dose of 3% ALA, the procedure was well-tolerated using PD of lignocaine. At higher doses (6% ALA) more effective anaesthesia is required and this can be obtained satisfactorily with EMDA of lignocaine. With refinement, ALA PDT may be feasible as an outpatient treatment for superficial bladder TCC.

Biodistribution of hypericin in orthotopic transitional cell carcinoma bladder tumors: implication for whole bladder wall photodynamic therapy

In a recent clinical study, we reported a selective uptake of hypericin in superficial bladder tumors. The results suggested that hypericin, a potent photosensitizer, could be used not only for diagnosis but also for photodynamic therapy (PDT) of superficial bladder tumors. In the present study, we investigated the biodistribution of hypericin in an orthotopic rat bladder tumor model by assessing the extent of hypericin penetration and the kinetics of accumulation into rat bladder tumors and normal bladder wall. Hypericin (8 or 30 microM) was instilled into the bladder via the catheter for 1, 2 or 4 hr. The fluorescence of hypericin in the bladder tumors and normal bladder was documented using fluorescence microscopy. In situ quantification of hypericin fluorescence in the tumor or normal bladder was performed using the laser-induced fluorescence technique. There was much more hypericin fluorescence in the tumor than in the normal bladder, with the tumor-to-normal-bladder ratio mounting to 12:1 after 4 hr of hypericin (30 microM) instillation. Moreover, hypericin was retained in the tumor for at least 1 hr before it was gradually lost from the tissue. Microscopically, the fluorescence of hypericin was restricted to the urothelial tumor and normal urothelium without fluorescence in the submucosa and the muscle layers. Subsequently no hypericin was detected in plasma, indicating that under these conditions systemic side effects should not be expected. Because the conditions used in this study were similar to those used in our previous clinical study, it is therefore likely that whole bladder wall PDT in the clinic under these conditions will produce selective urothelial tumor destruction without causing damage to the underlying muscle layers.

[Diagnosis and treatment of bladder tumors by photodynamic therapy]

Experimental results and clinical trials showed that bladder tumours Tis and pT1a can be diagnosed by photodynamic diagnosis and treated by photodynamic therapy. These photochemical methods are based on a selective photosensitizer uptake in the tumour tissue. After subsequent irradiation, these tissues emit a fluorescence (diagnosis) or can be destroyed by chemically induced oxidative compounds (treatment). Hematoporphyrin derivative and its oligomeric part have been the light-sensitizing drugs the most commonly studied. Interest has now shifted to 5-aminolevulinic acid, or its hexylester form, inducing protoporphyrin IX which shows better tumour localising properties and could avoid side effects. While photodynamic treatment is still an experimental modality, photodynamic diagnosis could achieve a more accurate detection of occult dysplasia compared to white light cystoscopy.

Light irradiation increases embryotoxicity of photodynamic therapy sensitizers (5-aminolevulinic acid and protoporphyrin IX) in chick embryos

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) of malignant processes is based on the ability of a photosensitizer to first, accumulate in malignant (immature) tissue and second, to be destroyed following light irradiation. Because of the similarity between malignant and embryonic immature tissues, we investigated the deleterious effect of the PDT procedure on day 4 chick embryos in ovo. We compared experimentally the photodynamic effect (light-toxic) and the side effect (dark-toxic) of the clinically attractive photosensitizers 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) and protoporphyrin IX (PP IX). The dark and light embryotoxicity (i.e. lethality plus teratogenicity) was determined after intra-amniotic injection of one of a range of dose of each compound. Under dark conditions, PP IX exhibited embryotoxicity at a dose of 10 microg/embryo; however ALA did not exhibit embryotoxicity even at the highest dose (300 microg/embryo). Light irradiation of embryos following injection induced strong embryotoxic effects of both substances even at dark-ineffective doses.

The role of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of recurrent superficial bladder cancer

Photodynamic therapy is an exciting area of research for the treatment of superficial bladder cancer. Significant responses have been seen in patients resistant to standard intravesical treatments. New areas of research are focused on the development of new sensitizers and light distribution methods with less dermal and bladder toxicity.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the treatment of patients with resistant superficial bladder cancer: a long-term experience

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) combines a photosensitizer such as Photofrin with red laser light (630 nm) to destroy cancer cells. Investigators have reported effectiveness of PDT in the management of patients with recurrent superficial bladder cancer. We retrospectively reviewed our experience in 58 patients to assess the long-term role of PDT in the management of resistant superficial transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) including Ta, T1, and refractory carcinoma in situ (CIS) of the urinary bladder.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All 58 patients had failed at least one course of standard intravesical therapy or had contraindication for intravesical chemo- or immunotherapy. Patients with malignancy present (Ta-T1/Grade I-III, CIS) were accepted for ablative PDT. Patients undergoing prophylactic PDT after complete resection were confirmed to be tumor-free by cystoscopy and bladder was cytology before PDT. Post-PDT evaluations included weekly telephone contact to assess acute adverse reactions and assessment of efficacy and bladder toxicity at three months and quarterly thereafter.

RESULTS

These 58 patients underwent a single PDT treatment with 2.0 or 1.5 mg/kg of Photofrin and 10-60 J/cm2 light (630 nm). At three months, complete response rates were 84% and 75% for residual resistant papillary TCC and refractory CIS respectively; and 90% of patients treated prophylactically had not had recurrences. At a median followup of 50 months (range 9-110), 59% (34/58) of the responders are alive, with 31/34 still disease-free.

CONCLUSION

PDT using 1.5 mg/kg of Photofrin and 15 J/cm2 of light (630 nm) should be considered a safe and effective treatment for refractory CIS or recurrent papillary TCC.

Phase I trial of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of recurrent superficial transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder

OBJECTIVES

A Phase I trial of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the treatment of superficial transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder was performed.

METHODS

Twenty patients with recurrent superficial TCC of the bladder after receiving a mean of 2.6 (range 1 to 6) courses of intravesical therapy were treated with PDT. The photosensitizer Photofrin II dose was 1.5 or 2.0 mg/kg. A 630-nm intravesical red laser was used to activate the photosensitizer 2 days after administration of Photofrin II. A 0.01% intralipid solution was used as a bladder-filling medium to scatter light and achieve more homogeneous light distribution. Light doses from 5.1 to 25.6 J/cm2 (total dosage 1500 to 5032 J) were used to illuminate the bladder.

RESULTS

Twenty patients underwent 21 treatments with PDT. Complications included asymptomatic reflux in 4 patients. One other patient, treated at the highest total light dose, experienced bladder contraction and fibrosis. Nine patients (45%) had no tumor evident at cystoscopy, on random biopsies, or in urinary cytology at the 3-month evaluation after treatment. Four patients remained without recurrent disease for 23 to 56 months. Sixteen of 20 (80%) patients experienced recurrence, and 8 of the 16 underwent cystectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

An intravenous photosensitizer dose of 1.5 mg/kg Photofrin II followed by light energy in the range of 13 J/cm2 (total light dose 2500 to 3250 J) was defined as a safe treatment parameter and resulted in tumor responses. With present technologies, administration of PDT requires careful dosimetry.

Photodynamic therapy in the management of bladder cancer

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is primarily suggested for the therapy of papillary transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) and refractory carcinoma in situ (CIS), and prophylaxis of recurrent superficial TCC in those patients who have failed intravesical chemotherapy or immunotherapy. We reviewed our 13-year experience to assess the long-term role of PDT in the management of superficial bladder cancer, and propose a standard protocol. Fifty eight patients underwent a single PDT treatment with 1.5-2.0 mg/kg of Photofrin and 10-25 J/cm2 of light (630 nm). This single PDT treatment produced overall response rates of 84.2% in 19 patients with recurrent superficial papillary TCC, 80% in 20 patients with refractory CIS, and 89.5% in 19 patients receiving prophylaxis. The PDT dose of 2.0 mg/kg and 15-25 J/cm2 produced the most durable tumor response at the expense of severe local morbidity. However, the PDT dose of 1.5 mg/kg and 10-15 J/cm2 yielded variable tumor responses, with minimal local morbidity. Overall our data confirm that PDT is an effective therapy for superficial bladder cancer. We recommend PDT as a second line or immediate therapy for BCG or chemotherapy failures using a standard PDT dose of 1.5 mg/kg of Photofrin and 15 J/cm2 (630 nm) and a scheduled repeat treatment with 1.5 mg/kg and 10 J/cm2 at 6 and 12 months.