Pediatric Staghorn Calculi: The Role of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Monotherapy With Special Reference to Ureteral Stenting

European Association of Urology and European Society for Paediatric Urology Guidelines on Paediatric Urinary Stone Disease

CONTEXT

Paediatric stone disease is an important clinically entity and management is often challenging. Although it is known that the condition is endemic in some geographic regions of the world, the global incidence is also increasing. Patient age and sex; the number, size, location, and composition of the stone; and the anatomy of the urinary tract are factors that need to be taken into consideration when choosing a treatment modality.

OBJECTIVE

To provide a general insight into the evaluation and management of urolithiasis in the paediatric population in the era of minimally invasive surgery.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A nonsystematic review of the literature on management of paediatric urolithiasis was conducted with the aim of presenting the most suitable treatment modality for different scenarios.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Because of high recurrence rates, open surgical intervention is not the first option for paediatric stone disease, except for very young patients with very large stones in association with congenital abnormalities. Minimally invasive surgeries have become the first option with the availability of appropriately sized instruments and accumulating experience. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) is noninvasive and can be carried out as an outpatient procedure under sedation, and is the initial choice for management of smaller stones. However, for larger stones, SWL has lower stone-free rates and higher retreatment rates, so minimally invasive endourology procedures such as percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery are preferred treatment options.

CONCLUSIONS

Contemporary surgical treatment for paediatric urolithiasis typically uses minimally invasive modalities. Open surgery is very rarely indicated.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Cases of urinary stones in children are increasing. Minimally invasive surgery can achieve high stone-free rates with low complication rates. After stone removal, metabolic evaluation is strongly recommended so that medical treatment for any underlying metabolic abnormality can be given. Regular follow-up with imaging such as ultrasound is required because of the high recurrence rates.

Combined treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction and renal calculi with robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty and laser lithotripsy in children: Case report and non-systematic review of the literature

OBJECTIVE(S)

The incidence of urinary tract stone disease is steadily increasing in both adult and paediatric populations. This condition develops due to different factors: dietary or metabolic alterations, infection, and congenital anatomic malformations. Standard indications and treatments for children are analogous to the ones indicated for adults. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, ureterorenoscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) should be preferred to more invasive techniques. Moreover, the introduction of laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic approaches have improved surgical outcomes, lowering the bleeding risk with higher stone-free rates, even in complicated cases. Despite these well-known improvements, there are few reports regarding laparoscopic robot-assisted management for urinary tract stone disease in paediatric patients under the age of 10, especially with concomitant treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction and multiple calyceal stones.

PATIENT AND METHOD(S)

A 4-year-old child was referred for recurrent right abdominal flank pain, macroscopic haematuria and a previous history of urinary tract infections. A computed tomography of the abdomen showed right ureteropelvic junction obstruction associated with multiple unilateral stones located in the renal pelvis and in the interpolar renal calyces. Due to its complexity, we held a multidisciplinary meeting with paediatric surgeons and nephrologists to determine optimal treatment. As a result, a combined robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) and renal calculi holmium laser lithotripsy using a digital flexible ureteroscope through an abdominal robotic trocar was performed. No post-surgical complications were recorded, and the patient was discharged within 48 h following surgery. At subsequent regular follow-up examinations over a period of 24 months, no signs of recurrence were detected for both ureteropelvic junction obstruction and stone disease.

RESULT(S)

Robot-assisted LP with concomitant laser lithotripsy is a reasonable treatment option for designated young paediatric patients with challenging ureteropelvic junction obstruction complicated by urolithiasis, especially in cases where stones are not amenable with standard procedures.

Stones in pregnancy and pediatrics

Urinary stone disease is a highly prevalent condition affecting approximately 10% of the population, and has increased in incidence significantly over the past 20 years. Along with this, the rate of stone disease among women and children is also on the rise. The management of stone disease in specific populations, such as in children and during pregnancy can present unique challenges to the urologist. In both populations, a multi-disciplinary approach is strongly recommended given the complexities of the patients. Prompt and accurate diagnosis requires a high degree of suspicion and judicious use of diagnostic imaging given the higher risks of radiation exposure. In general, management proceeds from conservative to more invasive approaches and must be individualized to the patient with careful consideration of the potential adverse effects. However, innovations in endourologic equipment and techniques have allowed for the wider application of surgical stone treatment in these patients, and significant advancement in the field. This review covers the history and current advances in the diagnosis and management of stone disease in pregnant and pediatric populations. It is paramount for the urologist to understand the complexities of properly managing stones in these patients in order to maximize treatment efficacy, while minimizing complications and morbidity.

Percutaneous insertion of double-J ureteral stent in children with ureteral obstruction: our experiences

OBJECTIVE

Ureteral obstruction (UO) is usually treated by surgical or endoscopic approaches. We investigated whether percutaneous anterograde treatment with insertion of double-J ureteral stent (DJ) is a feasible alternative technique for the management of UO in selected cases, where traditional approaches are not possible or too risky.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The DJ was percutaneously inserted into 10 children (mean age 9 years) who suffered from UO. Three children had already been treated surgically for complex urotract congenital anomalies; six children had restenosis/reocclusion or stenosis of ureteropelvic junction; and one girl suffered migration of an intraoperatively placed DJ with stenosis of the distal ureter.

RESULTS

Percutaneous insertion of the DJ was successful on the first attempt in 8 and on the second in 2 children. Adverse events after the procedure, all successfully treated, included one pyelonephritis and one migration of DJ, and 3 children had bacteriuria and 3 hematuria. Mean duration of insertion of the DJ was 6.4 months. After removal of the DJ, 7 children did not need any further interventions, but 2 children needed surgical correction and 1 reinsertion of the DJ.

CONCLUSION

In selected cases, percutanous insertion of a DJ should be considered as an alternative to surgery or endoscopic treatment in the management of children with UO.

Treatment of pediatric renal stones in a Western country: a changing pattern

BACKGROUND

Over the last 10years the miniaturization of endoscopic instruments made minimally invasive procedures for kidney stones feasible even in children. The evolution in management of kidney stones in a tertiary care center in Europe is reported.

METHODS

Patients treated in our hospital for kidney stones from 2002 to 2011 were reviewed and group A (2002 to 2006) was compared with group B (2007 to 2011). The therapeutic options offered were Extracorporeal Shock Waves Lithotripsy (ESWL), Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS), Percutaneous Lithotripsy (PCNL) and open surgery. Outcome measures were: first treatment chosen, stone free rate after a single procedure, and retreatment. Results were compared by chi-square test, with p <0.05 considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

333 patients, mean age 9.7years, were treated, 161 in group A and 172 in group B. ESWL was the first option in both groups, but decreased by 34% in group B vs A. In contrast, RIRS and PCNL increased by 17% and 16%, respectively, in group B vs group A. Open surgery was never required in primary lithiasis cases without associated malformations.

CONCLUSION

The advent of PCNL and RIRS has significantly changed the pattern of renal stone treatment in the pediatric age group. A progressive increase of endourologic minimally invasive procedures was recorded. Open surgery should be a very rare option.

The management of staghorn calculi in children

OBJECTIVES

To review reports focusing on the surgical treatment of staghorn stones in children, as despite all the improvements in the surgical treatment of paediatric urolithiasis the management of staghorn calculi still represents a challenging problem in urology practice.

METHODS

To evaluate current knowledge about treating staghorn calculi in children, we searched PubMed for relevant articles published between 1991 and 2011, using a combination of related keywords, i.e. staghorn stone, child, kidney calculi, surgical treatment, electrohydraulic shockwave therapy (ESWL), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), and open surgery. Reports relating to the treatment of paediatric stone disease in general (open surgery, PCNL, ESWL) were also searched with the same method. Additional references were obtained from the reference list of full-text reports.

RESULTS

Although open surgery had been widely used in the past for treating such stones in children, currently it has only limited indications in highly selected patients. Current published data clearly indicate that, in experienced hands, both PCNL and ESWL are now effective methods for treating staghorn calculi in children.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to advanced techniques and instrumentation, it is now possible to successfully treat staghorn calculi in children, with very limited safety concerns. Currently, while PCNL is recommended as the first-line surgical treatment, ESWL, open surgery and/or combined methods are valuable but secondary options in the treatment of paediatric staghorn calculi.

Current management of paediatric urolithiasis

We aimed to review a current management of paediatric nephrolithiasis. The current literature, including our own experience on the treatment of paediatric nephrolithiasis was reviewed by MEDLINE/PubMed search. We have used in our search following keywords: urolithiasis, nephrolithiasis, paediatrics, surgical treatment, conservative management, ESWL, ureteroscopy, and open renal surgery. The search was limited to the English language literature during the period of time from 1990 to 2011. All papers were reviewed independently by all co-authors and only the manuscripts directly related to the reviewed subjects were included into the current review. Due to the high incidence of predisposing factors for urolithiasis in children and high stone recurrence rates, every child with urinary stone should be given a complete metabolic evaluation. Most stones in children can be managed by ESWL and endoscopic techniques. Paediatric stone disease is an important clinical problem in paediatric urology practice. Because of its recurrent nature, every effort should be made to discover the underlying metabolic abnormality so that it can be treated appropriately. Obtaining a stone-free state with interventional management and close follow-up are of utmost importance.

Safety and efficacy of PCNL for management of staghorn calculi in pediatric patients

OBJECTIVES

There are few reports on the use of PCNL for staghorn calculi in children. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of this technique, using adult equipment, in children below 16 years of age.

METHODS

Data for pediatric patients undergoing PCNL for staghorn renal calculi was prospectively recorded. A staghorn calculus was defined as a branched stone occupying more than one part of the collecting system. A standard fluoroscopy guided PCNL was performed in the prone position using adult nephroscopes. Stone clearance was assessed on fluoroscopy and X-ray in all patients and an ultrasound or CT scan in selected cases.

RESULTS

Beginning October 2007, 33 pediatric patients underwent 34 PCNLs at our center. 12 of these children had staghorn calculi. All patients had normal renal function and no metabolic abnormality. One child had a solitary kidney. In 5 children, the primary tract was placed into the superior calyx and 4 of these were above the 12th rib. A 21Fr nephroscope was used through a 24Fr tract in 9 children while a 26Fr nephroscope was used through a 30Fr tract in 3 cases. 10 children were managed through a single tract. One patient each required SWL and ureteroscopy for residual fragments. 11 patients had complete clearance while 1 had insignificant residue. One child required intravenous antibiotics for post-operative fever while another developed an abdominal collection that was managed conservatively.

CONCLUSIONS

PCNL is safe and effective in the management of pediatric staghorn calculi.

Clinical practice: surgical approaches to urolithiasis in children

The incidence of urolithiasis in children is increasing. Adequate knowledge of treatment modalities and surgical options is therefore essential for every pediatrician. Surgical approaches to urolithiasis in children continue to evolve with advancements in technology and sophistication of current equipment and techniques. Perhaps the most significant development in new techniques is the advent of robotic-assisted laparoscopy. This review, for the general pediatrician, summarizes the most recent pediatric data and guidelines for surgical approaches to treatment of urolithiasis.

Evaluation of renal function in children undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy

PURPOSE

The effect of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on the growing kidneys of young children has always been a concern. We determined whether shock wave lithotripsy causes renal parenchymal scarring or affects glomerular filtration rate in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study included 100 children with renal stones who presented to the shock wave lithotripsy unit at our institution between March 2005 and March 2008. A total of 28 children had multiple stones in the same kidney. All children with bilateral renal stones had 1 kidney cleared of stones by percutaneous nephrolithotomy before undergoing shock wave lithotripsy. A total of 138 stones were subjected to shock wave lithotripsy. All children underwent radionuclide scan of the renal parenchyma using dimercapto-succinic acid, and glomerular filtration rate was estimated using diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid before extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and 6 months afterward. Children with renal scarring due to previous surgery or vesicoureteral reflux were excluded from the study. The number of shock wave lithotripsy sessions to achieve stone-free status and the dose of shock waves used were recorded for each patient.

RESULTS

No patient demonstrated renal parenchymal scarring on dimercapto-succinic acid scan or any statistically significant change in glomerular filtration rate on diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid scan up to 6 months after shock wave lithotripsy.

CONCLUSIONS

Shock wave lithotripsy is a safe modality for treating renal calculous disease in children up to 16 years old, with no impact on long-term kidney function.

Contemporary surgical management of pediatric urolithiasis

With miniaturization of instruments and refinement of surgical technique, the management of pediatric stone disease has undergone a dramatic evolution. While shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) is still commonly used to treat upper tract calculi, the use of ureteroscopy (URS) has dramatically increased and is now the procedure of choice for upper tract stone burdens less than 1.5cm at centers with significant experience. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has replaced open surgical techniques for the treatment of large stone burdens greater than 2cm, with efficacy and complication rates similar to the adult population. Large institutional series demonstrate comparable stone-free and complication rates with SWL, URS, and PCNL, but concerns remain with these techniques regarding renal development and damage to the pediatric urinary tract. Randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of SWL and URS for upper tract stone burdens are needed to reach consensus regarding the most effective primary treatment modality in children.

[Staghorn or complex calculi: surgical considerations]

It is recommended to treat staghorn calculi by percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) either alone or in combination with Extra Corporeal Shockwave Lithotrips (ESWL). Antegrade or retrograde fibroscopy, multiple accesses could also improve PCNL stone-free rates. ESWL alone is limited to partial staghorn calculi in adults or to staghorn calculi in children. Open surgery has more or less completely passed.

Endourological management of pediatric stone disease: present status

PURPOSE

The incidence of nephrolithiasis in the pediatric population has been steadily increasing. The miniaturization of endoscopic instruments and improvement in imaging modalities have facilitated safe and effective endourological treatment in this patient population. We reviewed the current status of pediatric stone disease management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive literature review was performed using MEDLINE/PubMed to evaluate the indications, techniques, complications and efficacy of endourological stone management in children.

RESULTS

In the 1980s shock wave lithotripsy revolutionized stone management in children, becoming the procedure of choice for treating upper tract calculi less than 1.5 cm. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy has replaced open surgical techniques for the treatment of stone burdens greater than 1.5 cm with efficacy and complication rates mirroring those in the adult population. However, at an increasing number of centers ureteroscopy is now being performed in cases that previously would have been treated with shock wave lithotripsy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Results from recent retrospective series demonstrate that stone-free rates and complication rates with ureteroscopy are comparable to percutaneous nephrolithotomy and shock wave lithotripsy. Although concerns remain with all endoscopic techniques in children regarding damage to the urinary tract and renal development, neither short-term nor long-term adverse effects have been consistently reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopy are highly effective endourological techniques to treat stone disease in the pediatric population. A lack of prospective randomized trials comparing treatment modalities coupled with a vast disparity in the access to resources worldwide continues to individualize rather than standardize stone treatment in children.

Is extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in pediatrics a safe procedure?

Removal of urinary calculi is an essential element in the successful treatment of patients with urinary stone disease. The new generation of lithotriptors allows the treatment without the need for general anesthesia. The patients, often outpatients, have a faster discharge from the hospital with a reduction of hospitalization time and operating costs. Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) is currently considered a safe technique for treatment of pediatric urinary lithiasias, with a low percentage of complications and subsequent surgical retreatments. But can we define SWL as a safe procedure in pediatrics? Herein, we will review the literature to justify SWL safety in children, focusing on important parameters as the insertion of preoperative stenting, side effects, and complications after the procedure.

Management of pediatric stone disease

Pediatric and adult stone disease differs in both presentation and treatment. Children can present with a wide range of symptoms varying from flank pain and hematuria to nonspecific symptoms such as irritability and nausea. Although ultrasonography and plain radiographs can play a role in diagnosis and follow-up, the standard of care for a child who presents to the emergency department with a history suggestive of a stone is noncontrast spiral CT. Because there is a high yield in identifying predisposing factors in children with urolithiasis and high recurrence rates, metabolic evaluation of every child with a urinary stone should be undertaken and medical treatment should be given if necessary. With recent advances in technology, stone management has changed from an open surgical approach to less invasive procedures such as extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy and endoscopic techniques. Herein, we present a review of the recent literature and offer our own preferences to approaches for treatment.

Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy monotherapy of partial staghorn calculi. Prognostic factors and long-term results

OBJECTIVE

To define factors affecting the success and long-term outcome of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) monotherapy of partial staghorn calculi.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 92 patients with partial staghorn calculi who were treated with ESWL monotherapy. The outcome of the treatment was evaluated after 3 months. Long-term follow-up data (>24 months) were available for 49 patients. These data were further analyzed to determine long-term outcome.

RESULTS

At 3 months, the overall stone-free rate was 59.8%. Multiple ESWL sessions were required in 85.8% of patients. Stone surface area>500 mm2 was the only factor that significantly decreased the stone-free rate. Post-ESWL complications occurred in 12 patients (13%), among whom renal obstruction was observed in 10.8%. Secondary procedures were needed in 17 cases (18.4%). After a mean follow-up period of 7.5 years, the stone-free rate was 59.2% (29/49) and one-third of patients developed recurrence. In the long term, clinically insignificant residual fragments (CIRFs) passed spontaneously in 23% of patients, remained stable in 38.5% and became bigger in 38.5%. Regrowth of CIRFs was related to a history of stone recurrence. No patients showed deterioration of kidney function on the treated side and an improvement in pre-ESWL hydronephrosis was observed in 73.3% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

ESWL is suitable for staghorn stones<or=500 mm2. In the long term, CIRFs became bigger and required secondary intervention in one-third of patients. A history of stone recurrence is a significant predictor of regrowth of CIRFs. ESWL provides long-term preservation of function of the treated kidneys; however, one-third of patients develop recurrence.

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children: evaluation of the results considering the need for auxiliary procedures

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively evaluate the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in children with renal stones, with regard to ability of ureters to transport the fragments, and need for adjunctive procedures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2000 and November 2004, 60 children (24 girls and 36 boys) with a total of 72 stones of the upper urinary tract were treated by ESWL using a PCK V5 lithotriptor. Patients with anatomical abnormalities and staghorn stones were excluded from the study. Stone size ranged from 4 to 28 mm. Mean number of shock waves was 1430 (range 600-2000) per ESWL session and mean energy used for stone disintegration was 12 kV (range 6-18). At 24-48 h after ESWL, a plain film or renal ultrasound was obtained to evaluate stone fragmentation.

RESULTS

Our stone-free rate after one session of ESWL was 92.8% and 81.2% for patients with stones smaller than 10mm and stones between 10 and 28 mm, respectively. Seven (11.6%) patients developed distal ureteral steinstrasse, and the stone size was 15-20 mm and 20-28 mm in two and five patients, respectively. The steinstrasse completely cleared under meticulous follow-up. No patient needed an adjunctive procedure, such as a double-J stent or nephrostomy tube placement, or ureteroscopic stone manipulation.

CONCLUSION

A child's ureter is capable of transporting the fragments after lithotripsy. Interventional procedures should be a last resort. Expectant management is usually adequate even in patients who develop steinstrasse after ESWL.

Factors affecting the success rate of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal calculi in children

The aim of the study was to analyse factors affecting the success rate of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in children with renal calculi. We performed a retrospective analysis reviewing records of 85 (40 female, 45 male) children (89 renal units) subjected to ESWL for treatment of renal calculi during 1990-2005 in our department. As 4 patients had bilateral calculi and 19 children (21 renal units) had renal stones at more than one different site, each location was analysed separately for convenience. The mean age of the patients was 10.3+/-4.6 (2-16) years. The stone-free rates for renal pelvis, lower, middle and upper caliceal calculi were 70, 62, 50 and 73%, respectively. A higher rate (33%) of insignificant fragments (< or = 4 mm) was noted for lower pole calculi. Increased stone diameter (P=0.0001) and burden (P=0.04) were found as the most significant factors that adversely affect the stone-free rate for pelvis renalis calculi, whereas an acutely oriented infundibulum and/or a long lower infundibulum (P=0.005) were unfavourable factors for clearance of lower caliceal stones. The stone-free rate in children with multiple calculi was 48%, while 29% of the renal units had retained fragments. ESWL is a good initial option for treatment of most of the renal calculi < 2 cm except in the presence of unfavourable lower caliceal anatomy. Increased stone burden, multiple stones, staghorn calculi, narrow lower infundibulopelvic angle and long lower infundibulum are factors that adversely affect the clearance rate.

Shockwave lithotripsy and endourological stone treatment in children

Urolithiasis in children is a rare disease in developed countries. Due to the particular anatomical conditions of the infant body, indications and results of the well-known treatment modalities, such as shockwave lithotripsy (SWL), ureteroscopy and PCNL, have to be determined. Experience in active stone treatment in children is very rare and only a limited number of papers are available. SWL can be performed only if focus size and treatment facilities are adapted to the size of the child. Miniaturization of ureteroscopes allows primary access to the infant upper urinary tract. Results, complications and morbidity of the treatment are similar to the results in adults. The main prerequisite for the primary endoscopic approach is the experience of the surgeon. PCNL should be performed as Mini-Perc. Percutaneous procedures show equal results and morbidity compared to the treatment of adults, in experienced hands. As two-thirds of infant stone patients have an underlying metabolic disorder, close cooperation of adult and pediatric urologists, nephrologists and radiologists is necessary in order to achieve good results in the treatment of infant stones.

Endoscopic management of stones in children

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Management of pediatric urolithiasis has evolved from open surgery to minimally invasive techniques. With advancements in instrumentation, endourological procedures are being performed more commonly in children. The current article reviews the literature published from January 2003 to September 2004 regarding endoscopic management of stones in children.

RECENT FINDINGS

Whereas recent literature supports shock-wave lithotripsy as the preferred treatment option for pediatric stones, it also confirms the safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopy in all age groups. Retrograde intrarenal surgery and laparoscopic surgery are newer additions to the armamentarium of the endourologist but their role needs to be better defined.

SUMMARY

The majority of stones in children can be managed using minimally invasive techniques. Proper treatment planning and use of appropriate instrumentation are important to achieve optimal outcome.

Ureteroscopy for pediatric urolithiasis: An evolving first-line therapy

OBJECTIVES

To present in a retrospective report a contemporary series of patients aged 14 years and younger who were treated for stones with ureteroscopy at our institution from 1991 to 2002. With the improvement and miniaturization of ureteroscopes and ancillary instruments, the endoscopic treatment of renal and ureteral calculi in children has become more feasible.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed of 23 patients aged 14 years and younger who had undergone ureteroscopy for the treatment of ureteral or renal calculi at our institution.

RESULTS

A total of 27 stones were treated in 23 patients. Of the 27 stones, 18 were in the distal ureter, 5 in the mid ureter, 2 in the proximal ureter, and 2 in the renal pelvis. Ureteral dilation was performed in 4 (17.4%) of the 23 patients. The lithotripsy modalities used were holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser in 16 (69.6%), electrohydraulic lithotripsy in 3 (13%), a combination of holmium laser and electrohydraulic lithotripsy in 2 (8.7%), and basket extraction alone in 2 (8.7%) of 23 patients. Ureteral stents were placed in 21 (91.3%) of 23 patients. The average operative time was 46.9 minutes (range 15 to 92). In 21 (91.3%) of 23 patients, postoperative imaging was available and revealed that 20 (95.2%) of the 21 patients were rendered stone free. Two patients were lost to follow-up. No intraoperative complications occurred. One patient was treated postoperatively with intravenous antibiotics for transient fever.

CONCLUSIONS

Ureteroscopy is safe and effective in the management of ureteral and renal calculi in children. In our institution, it has emerged as a valid first-line therapy for the treatment of pediatric urolithiasis.

The use of stents in contemporary urology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Ureteral stents are a mainstay of today's urological armamentarium. This review critically evaluates the recent literature and provides a concise summary of the use of stents in urology today. While stents are used in many reconstructive urologic procedures, this review focuses on the use of stents in urolithiasis as it pertains to ureteroscopy, shockwave lithotripsy, and ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

RECENT FINDINGS

Ureteral stents are associated with irritative symptoms, hematuria, infection, and encrustation. A new validated quality of life and impact questionnaire has been developed and has shown that 76% of patients suffer at least some type of morbidity related to the stent. Many studies in the recent literature have re-examined our use of stents today. For example, concepts regarding stenting following ureteroscopy, before shockwave lithotripsy, and following endopyelotomy have undergone an evolution based on the results of randomized, prospective studies.

SUMMARY

The ureteral stent is an invaluable urological tool and its indications are evolving as are new stent technologies to improve patient care and comfort.