AN ARTICULATING RETRACTOR HOLDER TO FACILITATE LAPAROSCOPIC ADRENALECTOMY AND NEPHRECTOMY

Instrumentation for laparoscopic renal surgery--Padron Endoscopic Exposing Retractor (PEER) and Endoholder: point of technique

During laparoscopic surgery, as in open surgery, exposure is critical. However, this can be difficult during laparoscopy due to limited haptic feedback and the loss of 3-dimensional visualization. Excessive force may be inadvertently applied by assistants when anatomic structures are retracted; similarly, the retractors may be unknowingly moved because the limited field of view with the laparoscope precludes constant visualization of the retracting instrument. To overcome these problems, we have been using a 5- or 10-mm PEER retractor in combination with an articulating arm instrument holder (Endoholder) to aid laparoscopic renal surgery. The adjustable spring-loaded articulating instrument holder (Endoholder) consists of 4 components, including table attachment, a base rod, flexible extension arm, and precision clamp. The clamp accommodates variously sized instruments, and the flexible extension arm rotates 360 degrees to aid in positioning. The instrument holder is clamped to the table via the base rod over a sterile drape. A PEER Retractor, Roto-lok ratchet (5- or 10-mm diameter and 32-cm length) is placed intracorporeally to retract and position the kidney for hilar, upper, and lower pole dissection. The PEER retractor's handle is secured in place using the precision clamp of the instrument holder. The articulating instrument holder and PEER retractor are used for our renal, adrenal, and ureteral laparoscopic procedures. Placement of the retractor through a 5- or 10-mm port and deployment can be done quickly. Adequate and stable positioning of the retractor provides excellent and secure visualization of the operative field. These instruments have been used in more than 200 cases without any complication except 1 minor liver laceration. The articulating instrument holder with the PEER retractor is a very useful aid during laparoscopic renal surgery. This instrument reduces the chances of inadvertent injury to viscera by the assistant while maintaining an excellent anatomic view throughout the procedure. This will have a significant impact on the advancement of laparoscopy and its acceptance by every urologist.

Camera and instrument holders and their clinical value in minimally invasive surgery

During minimally invasive procedures an assistant is controlling the laparoscope. Ideally, the surgeon should be able to manipulate all instruments including the camera him/herself, to avoid communication problems and disturbing camera movements. Camera holders return camera-control to the surgeon and stabilize the laparoscopic image. An additional holder can be used to stabilize an extra laparoscopic instrument for retracting. A literature survey has been carried out giving an overview of the existing "robotic" and passive camera and instrument holders and, if available, results of their clinical value. Benefits and limitations were identified. Most studies showed that camera holders, passive and active, provide the surgeon with a more stable image and enables them to control their own view direction. Only the passive holders were suitable for holding instruments. Comparisons between different systems are reviewed. Both active and passive camera and instrument holders are functional, and may be helpful to perform solo-surgery. The benefits of active holders are questionable in relation to the performance of the much simpler passive designs.

Robotics and general surgery

Robotics are now being used in all surgical fields, including general surgery. By increasing intra-abdominal articulations while operating through small incisions, robotics are increasingly being used for a large number of visceral and solid organ operations, including those for the gallbladder, esophagus, stomach, intestines, colon, and rectum, as well as for the endocrine organs. Robotics and general surgery are blending for the first time in history and as a specialty field should continue to grow for many years to come. We continuously demand solutions to questions and limitations that are experienced in our daily work. Laparoscopy is laden with limitations such as fixed axis points at the trocar insertion sites, two-dimensional video monitors, limited dexterity at the instrument tips, lack of haptic sensation, and in some cases poor ergonomics. The creation of a surgical robot system with 3D visual capacity seems to deal with most of these limitations. Although some in the surgical community continue to test the feasibility of these surgical robots and to question the necessity of such an expensive venture, others are already postulating how to improve the next generation of telemanipulators, and in so doing are looking beyond today's horizon to find simpler solutions. As the robotic era enters the world of the general surgeon, more and more complex procedures will be able to be approached through small incisions. As technology catches up with our imaginations, robotic instruments (as opposed to robots) and 3D monitoring will become routine and continue to improve patient care by providing surgeons with the most precise, least traumatic ways of treating surgical disease.