STUDIES OF TIN ETHYL ETIOPURPURIN PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY OF THE CANINE PROSTATE

Targeted implementation strategies of precise photodynamic therapy based on clinical and technical demands

With the development of materials science, photodynamic-based treatments have gradually entered clinics. Photodynamic therapy is ideal for cancer treatment due to its non-invasive and spatiotemporal properties and is the first to be widely promoted in clinical practice. However, the shortcomings resulting from the gap between technical and clinical demands, such as phototoxicity, low tissue permeability, and tissue hypoxia, limit its wide applications. This article reviews the available data regarding the pharmacological and clinical factors affecting the efficacy of photodynamic therapy, such as photosensitizers and oxygen supply, disease diagnosis, and other aspects of photodynamic therapy. In addition, the synergistic treatment of photodynamic therapy with surgery and nanotechnology is also discussed, which is expected to provide inspiration for the design of photodynamic therapy strategies.

Photodynamic Therapy of Inorganic Complexes for the Treatment of Cancer†

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a medicinal tool that uses a photosensitizer and a light source to treat several conditions, including cancer. PDT uses reactive oxygen species such as cytotoxic singlet oxygen (¹ O₂ ) to induce cell death in cancer cells. Chemotherapy has historically utilized the cytotoxic effects of many metals, especially transition metal complexes. However, chemotherapy is a systemic treatment so all cells in a patient's body are exposed to the same cytotoxic effects. Transition metal complexes have also shown high cytotoxicity as PDT agents. PDT is a potential localized method for treating several cancer types by using inorganic complexes as photosensitizing agents. This review covers several in vitro and in vivo studies, as well as clinical trials that reported on the anticancer properties of inorganic pharmaceuticals used in PDT against different types of cancer.

Growing tool-kit of photosensitizers for clinical and non-clinical applications

Photosensitizers are photosensitive molecules utilized in clinical and non-clinical applications by taking advantage of light-mediated reactive oxygen generation, which triggers local and systemic cellular toxicity. Photosensitizers are used for diverse biological applications such as spatio-temporal inactivation of a protein in a living system by chromophore-assisted light inactivation, localized cell photoablation, photodynamic and immuno-photodynamic therapy, and correlative light-electron microscopy imaging. Substantial efforts have been made to develop several genetically encoded, chemically synthesized, and nanotechnologically driven photosensitizers for successful implementation in redox biology applications. Genetically encoded photosensitizers (GEPS) or reactive oxygen species (ROS) generating proteins have the advantage of using them in the living system since they can be manipulated by genetic engineering with a variety of target-specific genes for the precise spatio-temporal control of ROS generation. The GEPS variety is limited but is expanding with a variety of newly emerging GEPS proteins. Apart from GEPS, a large variety of chemically- and nanotechnologically-empowered photosensitizers have been developed with a major focus on photodynamic therapy-based cancer treatment alone or in combination with pre-existing treatment methods. Recently, immuno-photodynamic therapy has emerged as an effective cancer treatment method using smartly designed photosensitizers to initiate and engage the patient's immune system so as to empower the photosensitizing effect. In this review, we have discussed various types of photosensitizers, their clinical and non-clinical applications, and implementation toward intelligent efficacy, ROS efficiency, and target specificity in biological systems.

Photosensitizers in prostate cancer therapy

The search for new therapeutics for the treatment of prostate cancer is ongoing with a focus on the balance between the harms and benefits of treatment. New therapies are being constantly developed to offer treatments similar to radical therapies, with limited side effects. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a promising strategy in delivering focal treatment in primary as well as post radiotherapy prostate cancer. PDT involves activation of a photosensitizer (PS) by appropriate wavelength of light, generating transient levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Several photosensitizers have been developed with a focus on treating prostate cancer like mTHPC, motexafin lutetium, padoporfin and so on. This article will review newly developed photosensitizers under clinical trials for the treatment of prostate cancer, along with the potential advantages and disadvantages in delivering focal therapy.

Photodynamic therapy for focal ablation of the prostate

Although in early stages of clinical development, photodynamic therapy (PDT) shows promise in delivering focal treatment of both primary and post-radiotherapy prostate cancer. This article will review the mechanism of action of PDT, previous research using PDT for treating prostate cancer including the development of newer vascular-acting photosensitizers, and the potential advantages and disadvantages of PDT in delivering focal therapy.

Porphyrin and nonporphyrin photosensitizers in oncology: preclinical and clinical advances in photodynamic therapy

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is now a well-recognized modality for the treatment of cancer. While PDT has developed progressively over the last century, great advances have been observed in the field in recent years. The concept of dual selectivity of PDT agents is now widely accepted due to the relative specificity and selectivity of PDT along with the absence of harmful side effects often encountered with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Traditionally, porphyrin-based photosensitizers have dominated the PDT field but these first generation photosensitizers have several disadvantages, with poor light absorption and cutaneous photosensitivity being the predominant side effects. As a result, the requirement for new photosensitizers, including second generation porphyrins and porphyrin derivatives as well as third generation photosensitizers has arisen, with the aim of alleviating the problems encountered with first generation porphyrins and improving the efficacy of PDT. The investigation of nonporphyrin photosensitizers for the development of novel PDT agents has been considerably less extensive than porphyrin-based compounds; however, structural modification of nonporphyrin photosensitizers has allowed for manipulation of the photochemotherapeutic properties. The aim of this review is to provide an insight into PDT photosensitizers clinically approved for application in oncology, as well as those which show significant potential in ongoing preclinical studies.

Treatment planning using tailored and standard cylindrical light diffusers for photodynamic therapy of the prostate

Interstitial photodynamic therapy (PDT) has seen a rebirth, partially prompted by the development of photosensitizers with longer absorption wavelengths that enable the treatment of larger tissue volumes. Here, we study whether using diffusers with customizable longitudinal emission profiles, rather than conventional ones with flat emission profiles, improves our ability to conform the light dose to the prostate. We present a modified Cimmino linear feasibility algorithm to solve the treatment planning problem, which improves upon previous algorithms by (1) correctly minimizing the cost function that penalizes deviations from the prescribed light dose, and (2) regularizing the inverse problem. Based on this algorithm, treatment plans were obtained under a variety of light delivery scenarios using 5-15 standard or tailored diffusers. The sensitivity of the resulting light dose distributions to uncertainties in the optical properties, and the placement of diffusers was also studied. We find that tailored diffusers only marginally outperform conventional ones in terms of prostate coverage and rectal sparing. Furthermore, it is shown that small perturbations in optical properties can lead to large changes in the light dose distribution, but that those changes can be largely corrected with a simple light dose re-normalization. Finally, we find that prostate coverage is only minimally affected by small changes in diffuser placement. Our results suggest that prostate PDT is not likely to benefit from the use of tailored diffusers. Other locations with more complex geometries might see a better improvement.

[Photodynamic therapy in localised prostate cancer]

Photodynamic therapy is based on the administration of an energy source in form of light of a specific wavelength, on a previously photosensitized tissue by a chemical compound, in the presence of oxygen, so that the great deal of free radicals and oxygen derivatives generated (hydroxyl compounds) produces necrosis of the treated tissue. Technique improvement during the last years has allowed its recent development as a therapeutic method for localised prostate cancer. At present, several clinical trials are ongoing in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer both as a first line and salvage treatment. There is no risk either of cancer dissemination in surrounding tissues or accumulative pharmaco-toxicity. Therefore, the technique can be repeated as often as needed and can be administered on a previously irradiated tissue. The literature review shows that photodynamic treatment will become a therapeutic option for patients with prostate cancer in the very near future.

Photodynamic therapy of the canine prostate: intra-arterial drug delivery

PURPOSE

Interstitial photodynamic therapy (PDT) selectively destroys tissue targeted with a photosensitizer and then exposed to light of a specific wavelength. We report a novel delivery method--intra-arterial drug delivery for PDT of the prostate--in a canine model.

METHODS

To evaluate drug distribution, the prostatovesical artery was selectively cannulated and photosensitizers alone or in conjunction with 99m-technetium-labeled macro-aggregated albumin ((99m)Tc-MAA) were injected via a 3 Fr microcatheter in 8 animals. One dog was followed for 3 months to determine tolerance and toxicity. The remaining animals were euthanized and imaged with whole-body single photon emission CT and gamma counting for radioactivity distribution. Photosensitizer distribution was further analyzed by fluorescence confocal microscopy and tissue chemical extraction. To evaluate PDT, the photosensitizer QLT0074 was infused in 3 animals followed by interstitial illumination with 690 nm laser light.

RESULTS

Intra-arterial infusion selectively delivered drugs to the prostate, with both radioactivity and photosensitizer levels significantly higher (up to 18 times) than in the surrounding organs (i.e., rectum). With unilateral injection of (99m)Tc-MAA, only the injected half of the prostate showed activity whereas bilateral administration resulted in drug delivery to the entire prostate. PDT resulted in comprehensive damage to the prostate without severe complications or systemic toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Injection of radiolabeled MAA into the prostatovesical artery results in distribution within the prostate with negligible amounts reaching the adjacent organs. PDT also demonstrates selective damage to the prostate, which warrants clinical application in targeted prostate therapies.

The effect of Tookad-mediated photodynamic ablation of the prostate gland on adjacent tissues--in vivo study in a canine model

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) mediated with vascular acting photosensitizer Tookad (Pd-bacteriopheophorbide) was investigated as an alternative modality for treating prostate cancer. Photodynamic effects on the prostate gland and its adjacent tissues were evaluated in a canine model. Interstitial prostate PDT was performed by irradiating individual lobes with a cylindrical diffuser fiber at various drug/light doses. The sensitivity of the adjacent tissues to Tookad PDT was determined by directly irradiating the surface of the bladder, colon, abdominal muscle and pelvic plexus with a microlens fiber at various drug/light doses. The prostate and adjacent tissues were harvested one-week after the treatment and subjected to histopathological examination. PDT-induced prostate lesions were characterized by marked hemorrhagic necrosis. The bladder, colon, abdominal muscle and pelvic plexus appeared to be sensitive to PDT although the Tookad PDT-induced responses in these tissues were minimal compared to that of the prostate gland at the same dose levels. Nevertheless, the protection of the adjacent tissues should be taken into consideration during the total prostate ablation process due to their sensitivity to PDT. The sensitivity of the prostatic urethra is worth further investigation. Direct intraurethral irradiation might provide an ideal means to determine the sensitivity of the prostatic urethra and might lead to transurethral PDT protocols for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BHP).

Interstitial photodynamic therapy of the canine prostate using intra-arterial administration of photosensitizer and computerized pulsed light delivery

PURPOSE

We determined the feasibility of complete treatment of the canine prostate and long-term effectiveness of interstitial photodynamic therapy using the intra-arterial photosensitizer QLT0074 (benzoporphyrin derivative 1,3-diene C,D-diethylene glycol ester A ring) (QLT, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada) administration and pulsed light delivery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The prostate gland of 11 dogs were infused with QLT0074 via the prostatovesical arteries (2 mg drug per artery bilaterally) under fluoroscopic guidance. Immediately following infusion the prostate was surgically exposed and 7 optical fibers with 1.5 cm cylindrical diffusers in after loading sheaths were inserted into the prostate through a template. Light was delivered sequentially to the optic fibers via a computer driven switch system. One dog was sacrificed 6 days after photodynamic therapy to assess acute tissue effects. The other 10 dogs were monitored for clinical tolerance and urinary function, and sacrificed at between 3 and 11 months. Prostate specimens were examined microscopically to evaluate long-term tissue reactions.

RESULTS

Comprehensive destruction of the prostate was noted in the acute dog. Except for urinary retention and mild hematuria no other perioperative complications were observed in the chronic dogs. Urodynamic examination did not reveal deleterious bladder and urethral function. Average prostate volume decreased 71% at 3 months and 56% after 6 months (p=0.007 and 0.014, respectively). Microscopic evaluation revealed prostate glandular epithelial atrophy, stromal fibrosis and mononuclear cell infiltration.

CONCLUSIONS

Interstitial photodynamic therapy using intra-arterial QLT0074 and pulsed light delivery is safe and feasible for comprehensive destruction of the canine prostate. Clinical trials are required to confirm it for managing prostate diseases.

Preliminary results of interstitial motexafin lutetium-mediated PDT for prostate cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Interstitial photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an emerging modality for the treatment of solid organ disease. Our group at the University of Pennsylvania has performed extensive studies that demonstrate the feasibility of interstitial PDT for prostate cancer. Our preclinical and clinical experience is herein detailed.

STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS

We have treated 16 canines in preclinical studies, and 16 human subjects in a Phase I study, using motexafin lutetium-mediated PDT for recurrent prostate adenocarcinoma. Dosimetry of light fluence, drug level and oxygen distribution for these patients were performed.

RESULTS

We demonstrate the safe and comprehensive treatment of the prostate using PDT. However, there is significant variability in the dose distribution and the subsequent tissue necrosis throughout the prostate.

CONCLUSIONS

PDT is an attractive option for the treatment of prostate adenocarcinoma. However, the observed variation in PDT dose distribution translates into uncertain therapeutic reproducibility. Our future focus will be on the development of an integrated system that is able to both detect and compensate for dose variations in real-time, in order to deliver a consistent overall PDT dose distribution.

Photodynamic therapy using meso tetra hydroxy phenyl chlorin (mTHPC) in early prostate cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Prostate cancer is increasing in incidence, but current treatments including surgery and radiotherapy have significant side effects. This pilot study was designed to assess the potential of photodynamic therapy (PDT) using meso tetra hydroxy phenyl chlorin (mTHPC) for organ confined prostate cancer.

STUDY DESIGN/PATIENTS AND METHODS

Six men with organ confined prostate cancer were photosensitised with mTHPC (0.15 mg/kg). Between 2 and 5 days later, red light (652 nm) was delivered to areas of biopsy proven cancer via fibres inserted through transperineal needles (50-100 J per site).

RESULTS

After 8 of 10 PDT sessions, the prostate specific antigen (PSA) fell by up to 67%. Early MRI scans showed oedema and patchy necrosis, which resolved over 2 months. Biopsies of treated areas revealed necrosis and fibrosis at 1-2 months.

CONCLUSIONS

PDT for primary prostate cancer appears safe and can reduce PSA levels. As this was a phase I study, no attempt was made to treat the whole prostate; this or targeted tumour ablation could be attempted in a phase II study with an increased number of fibres. This technique merits further investigation in early prostate cancer.

Prostate PDT dosimetry

We provide a review of the current state of dosimetry in prostate photodynamic therapy (PDT). PDT of the human prostate has been performed with a number of different photosensitizers and with a variety of dosimetry schemes. The simplest clinical light dose prescription is to quantify the total light energy emitted per length (J/cm) of cylindrical diffusing fibers (CDF) for patients treated with a defined photosensitizer injection per body weight. However, this approach does not take into account the light scattering by tissue and usually underestimates the local light fluence rate, and consequently the fluence. Techniques have been developed to characterize tissue optical properties and light fluence rates in vivo using interstitial measurements during prostate PDT. Optical methods have been developed to characterize tissue absorption and scattering spectra, which in turn provide information about tissue oxygenation and drug concentration. Fluorescence techniques can be used to quantify drug concentrations and photobleaching rates of photosensitizers.

Photodynamic therapy for prostate cancer: One urologist's perspective

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has slowly found its place in the treatment of human disease. Currently, photodynamic therapy is being explored as a treatment option for localized prostate cancer. PDT for the treatment of prostate cancer will require ablation of both malignant and non-malignant glandular epithelium. Ablation of both malignant and normal epithelium adds a new treatment dimension since traditionally PDT has not targeted normal epithelial tissue. PDT for prostate cancer as currently envisioned will present challenges in terms of in situ monitoring of light, drug concentration, [Formula: see text] levels and biologic endpoints. The introduction of vascular-targeted photosensitizers fundamentally alters the traditional axioms for successful PDT treatment by obviating the need for "selective" tumor localization. Should clinical trials demonstrate the utility of this approach, patients with organ-confined disease will benefit.

Photodynamic Therapy for Urological Malignancies: Past to Current Approaches

PURPOSE

Modern PDT for urological tumors is a potentially selective approach in which in situ photosensitization by a nontoxic drug, locally activated by light, generates cytotoxic reactive oxygen species, causing cell death. While urological clinical experience with PDT is largely limited to treatment for superficial bladder cancer, the advent of novel photosensitizers and technologies for treatment planning, light delivery and dosimetry, PDT for prostate and other urological cancers appears increasingly realistic.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the current literature on PDT for urological tumors, in addition to recent emerging data from our laboratory and elsewhere.

RESULTS

Remarkable progress has been made in the field of photochemistry and photobiology. Together with improved optical delivery and imaging systems PDT holds promise as an alternative, minimally invasive and potentially curative treatment for localized solid tumors as well as for palliative treatment for isolated, clinically problematic metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Current experience with photodynamic therapy using contemporary photosensitizing agents and light sources is mainly restricted to in vivo experimental models and early phase clinical trails. However, ongoing preclinical work and clinical trials indicate that safer and effective PDT treatments in uro-oncology are imminent.

Studies of a vascular-acting photosensitizer, Pd-bacteriopheophorbide (Tookad), in normal canine prostate and spontaneous canine prostate cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) mediated with Tookad (Pd-bacteriopheophorbide, WST09) was investigated pre-clinically as part of a program to develop an alternative modality for treating prostate cancer.

STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS

Spontaneous canine prostate cancer and normal canine prostate were used as the animal models. Interstitial PDT was performed by IV infusion of the photosensitizer and irradiating the prostates with a diode laser (763 nm). The prostates were harvested 1-week post-PDT and subjected to histopathologic examinations. The effects of the drug doses and light doses were studied for one- and two-session PDT. Pharmacokinetics were studied using HPLC assay. The feasibility of using perfusing CT scans for assessing PDT lesions was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Tookad is a vascular-acting drug and clears rapidly from the circulation. Tookad-PDT-induced lesions, in both normal and cancerous prostates, were characterized by marked hemorrhagic necrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Tookad-PDT is very effective in ablating prostatic tissue through its vascular effects.

Effects of photodynamic therapy on peripheral nerve: in situ compound-action potentials study in a canine model

OBJECTIVE

Our aim is to investigate the effects of photodynamic therapy (PDT) on peripheral nerve conductivity.

BACKGROUND DATA

Interstitial PDT has been demonstrated as a promising treatment modality for prostate cancer. However, the sensitivity of nerves, in the immediate vicinity of the prostate gland, to PDT procedures has not been studied. This study attempts to establish an in situ canine model to evaluate direct PDT effect on peripheral nerves.

METHODS

PDT was performed by irradiating the cutaneous branches of the saphenous nerve at 763 nm with light doses of 50-200 J/cm2 after i.v. infusion of the photosensitizer Tookad (0-2 mg/kg). Evoked compound-action potentials (CAP) were recorded directly from the surface of the saphenous nerve. The latencies to onset and conduction velocities were determined during PDT and 1-week post-PDT.

RESULTS

Nerve and surrounding tissue damage corresponded well with drug/light doses. With Tookad doses of 2 mg/kg, treatment with 50 J/cm2 induced little change in saphenous nerve conduction properties. However, treatment with 100 J/cm2 resulted in localized nerve injury and decreases in nerve conduction velocities, and treatment with 200 J/cm2 severely damaged the nerve.

CONCLUSIONS

This canine model adequately demonstrates effects of Tookad PDT on peripheral nerves. Direct irradiation of 100-200 J/cm2 can alter nerve conduction and induce nerve damage. Therefore, possible side effects of interstitial PDT on the pelvic plexus need to be investigated in future studies.

OPTICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CANINE PROSTATE AT 665 NM SENSITIZED WITH TIN ETIOPURPURIN DICHLORIDE: NEED FOR REAL-TIME MONITORING OF PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY

PURPOSE

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an emerging, minimally invasive therapy for prostate cancer that depends on the sequestration of a photosensitizing drug within targeted tissue. The photosensitizer is subsequently activated by light of a specific wavelength, resulting in destruction of the targeted tissue. Successful treatment requires knowledge of the optical properties of the target tissue, a critical element for therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adult canines were injected with tin etiopurpurin dichloride (1.0 mg/kg) as a liposome emulsion vehicle in saline 24 hours prior to light treatment. Laser light was delivered to the prostate via a 400 microm optical fiber fitted with a 2.0 cm cylindrical diffuser and optical properties of the prostate were measured.

RESULTS

In this study we determined the attenuation coefficient and critical fluence in the canine prostate. Our studies shown that the attenuation coefficient is not uniform but higher at the base (average for all animals 2.59 to 2.79 cm-1) than in the mid section or apex of the prostate (1.71 to 1.90 cm-1). Significant differences among dogs (0.11 to 12.70 cm-1) were found. In some cases we observed a fluctuation of the attenuation coefficient during treatment. We also established experimentally the minimum energy (1449 mJ/cm2) needed (critical fluence) to produce necrosis. Experimentally establishing the values of effective attenuation and critical fluence is necessary to predict the area of ablation during PDT and protect surrounding organs from over treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our results it is evident that for PDT of the prostate to be successful the optical parameters of the prostate must be measured and monitored during treatment. We suggest that the optimum way of doing this is real-time computerized monitoring combined with simulation PDT.

Effects of Pd-bacteriopheophorbide (TOOKAD)-mediated photodynamic therapy on canine prostate pretreated with ionizing radiation

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of photodynamic therapy (PDT) using a novel palladium bacteriopherophorbide photosensitizer TOOKAD (WST09) on canine prostate that had been pretreated with ionizing radiation. To produce a physiological and anatomical environment in canine prostate similar to that in patients for whom radiotherapy has failed, canine prostates (n = 4) were exposed to ionizing radiation (54 Gy) 5 to 6 months prior to interstitial TOOKAD-mediated PDT. Light irradiation (763 nm, 50-200 J/cm at 150 mW/cm from a 1-cm cylindrical diffusing fiber) was delivered during intravenous infusion of TOOKAD at 2 mg/kg over 10 min. Interstitial measurements of tissue oxygen profile (pO(2)) and of local light fluence rate were also measured. The prostates were harvested for histological examination 1 week after PDT. The baseline pO(2) of preirradiated prostate was in the range 10-44 mmHg. The changes in relative light fluence rate during PDT ranged from 12 to 43%. The acute lesions were characterized by hemorrhagic necrosis, clearly distinguishable from the radiotherapy-induced pre-existing fibrosis. The lesion size was correlated with light fluence and comparable to that in unirradiated prostate treated with a similar TOOKAD-PDT protocol. There was no noticeable damage to the urethra, bladder or adjacent colon. The preliminary results obtained from a small number of animals indicate that TOOKAD-PDT can effectively ablate prostate pretreated with ionizing radiation, and so it may provide an alternative modality for those prostate cancer patients for whom radiotherapy has failed.

Photodynamic therapy: a new approach to prostate cancer

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is based on the concept that light irradiation can change an inert substance into an active one. In urology, hematoporphyrin derivative (HpD) and Photofrin (Axcan Scandipharm Inc., Birmingham, AL) are used most commonly as photosensitizing agents predominantly for the treatment of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. To investigate the basics for PDT of prostate cancer, several studies were performed on the optical characteristics of prostate tissue and prostate carcinoma tissue in vitro and in vivo and on the penetration depths of different laser wavelengths. Initial experimental studies to treat prostate cancer with PDT using HpD were done on Dunning tumors in rats. Combined with interstitial applicators, photodynamic therapy seems to have a great potential in the treatment of prostate carcinoma. However, it is an experimental treatment and even a preliminary evaluation will be possible only after the conclusion of clinical studies with the corresponding long-term results.

Photodynamic therapy for prostate cancer recurrence after radiotherapy: a phase I study

PURPOSE

Photodynamic therapy, using a photosensitizing drug activated by red light, can destroy localized areas of cancer with safe healing and without the cumulative toxicity associated with ionizing radiation. We used photodynamic therapy in a phase I-II study to treat patients with locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with an increasing prostate specific antigen (PSA) and biopsy proven local recurrence after radiotherapy were offered photodynamic therapy. Three days after intravenous administration of the photosensitizer meso-tetrahydroxyphenyl chlorin, light was applied using optical fibers inserted percutaneously through perineal needles positioned in the prostate with imaging guidance. Patients were followed with PSA measurements, prostate biopsies, computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging and questionnaires on urinary and sexual function.

RESULTS

Photodynamic therapy was given to 14 men using high light doses in 13. Treatment was well tolerated. PSA decreased in 9 patients (to undetectable levels in 2) and 5 had no viable tumor on posttreatment biopsies. After photodynamic therapy, contrast enhanced computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging showed necrosis involving up to 91% of the prostate cross section. In 4 men stress incontinence developed (troublesome in 2 and mild in 2) which is slowly improving. Sexual potency was impaired in 4 of the 7 men able to have intercourse before photodynamic therapy, which did not improve. There were no rectal complications directly related to photodynamic therapy, but in 1 patient a urethrorectal fistula developed following an ill-advised rectal biopsy 1 month after therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Photodynamic therapy is a new option that could be suitable for organ confined prostate cancer recurrence after radiotherapy. With more precise light dosimetry, it may be possible to destroy essentially all glandular tissue within the prostate with few complications. These results suggest that photodynamic therapy merits further investigation.

Preclinical studies in normal canine prostate of a novel palladium-bacteriopheophorbide (WST09) photosensitizer for photodynamic therapy of prostate cancers

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) uses light to activate a photosensitizer to achieve localized tumor control. In this study, PDT mediated by a second-generation photosensitizer, palladium-bacteriopheophorbide WST09 (Tookad) was investigated as an alternative therapy for prostate cancer. Normal canine prostate was used as the animal model. PDT was performed by irradiating the surgically exposed prostate superficially or interstitially at 763 nm to different total fluences (100 or 200 J/cm2; 50, 100 or 200 J/cm) at 5 or 15 min after intravenous administration of the drug (2 mg/kg). Areas on the bladder and colon were also irradiated. The local light fluence rate and temperature were monitored by interstitial probes in the prostate. All animals recovered well, without urethral complications. During the 1 week to 3 month post-treatment period, the prostates were harvested for histopathological examination. The PDT-induced lesions showed uniform hemorrhagic necrosis and atrophy, were well delineated from the adjacent normal tissue and increased linearly in diameter with the logarithm of the delivered light fluence. A maximum PDT-induced lesion size of over 3 cm diameter could be achieved with a single interstitial treatment. There was no damage to the bladder or rectum caused by scattered light from the prostate. The bladder and rectum were also directly irradiated with PDT. At 80 J/cm2, a full-depth necrosis was observed but resulted in no perforation. At 40 J/cm2, PDT produced minimal damage to the bladder or rectum. On the basis of optical dosimetry, we have estimated that 20 J/cm2 is the fluence required to produce prostatic necrosis. Thus, the normal structure adjacent to the prostate can be safely preserved with careful dosimetry. At therapeutic PDT levels, there was no structural or functional urethral damage even when the urethra was within the treated region. Hence, Tookad-PDT appears to be a promising candidate for prostate ablation in patients with recurrent, or possibly even primary, prostate cancer.