A CONTINENCE INDEX PREDICTS THE EARLY RETURN OF URINARY CONTINENCE AFTER RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY

The Effectiveness of Cystography-Measured Bladder Neck Elevation at Predicting the Return of Continence After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Purpose

To analyze the clinical parameters correlated with early recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy, with a focus on urethral mobility during pelvic contraction at catheter removal.

Methods

We prospectively analyzed 67 patients who underwent prostatectomy for prostate cancer at Jeju National University Hospital from January 2015 to June 2018. At the time of catheter removal, a cystography was performed in 67 men (median age, 65 years; range, 55–76 years) who had undergone robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. The vertical length of bladder neck movement between relaxing and contracting the pelvic muscles was measured. The correlation between the rate of continence recovery and the length of urethral movement was also assessed. All participants were divided into 2 groups according to the length of bladder neck elevation. Group 1 had ≥0.6 cm of elevation, while group 2 demonstrated <0.6 cm of elevation.

Results

A reverse correlation existed between the length of urethral movement and the recovery rate of urinary continence (r=–0.488, P<0.001). The optimal cutoff value for length of urethral movement was found to be 0.6 cm among patients (area under the curve, 0.703). A statistically significant difference was observed between group 1 (length≥0.6 cm) and group 2 (<0.6 cm) (P<0.05). Multivariate regression analysis showed that urethral movement predicted the postoperative urinary incontinence.

Conclusions

The extent of bladder neck elevation after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy, which can be easily evaluated using cystography, may be a good predictor of the recovery of urinary continence.

Age is predictive of immediate postoperative urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy

INTRODUCTION

Immediate continence is a goal to take into consideration for better patient satisfaction after radical prostatectomy. Factors predicting urinary continence at catheter removal were investigated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated preoperative, operative, clinical, hormonal and pathological variables in a homogeneous series of radical retropubic prostatectomies (RRPs) following the principles of urinary sphincter restoration technique.

RESULTS

The study included 201 patients who underwent RRP. The overall immediate continence rate at catheter removal was 67.7% (136 patients); 28.8% (58 patients) were using one protective pad daily and 3.5% (7 patients) were incontinent. At 6-month follow-up incontinence had reached the lowest level of 2.5% (5 patients) and at 12 months the patients using one pad daily had decreased to 11.9% (24 patients). Multivariate logistic analysis showed that the only two factors independently associated with immediate continence were age <65 years (OR = 2.63, 95% CI 1.13-5.88, p = 0.02) and potency (OR = 3.6, 95% CI 1.2-10.7, p = 0.01) adjusting for D'Amico risk group, surgical margins, extracapsular extension, clinical stage, PSA, testosterone, LH and FSH. No significant association was noted for PSA, hormonal levels, hospital stay, prostate size, clinical stage, risk group, TNM stage, pathological Gleason score or extracapsular extension.

CONCLUSIONS

In our series age <65 years was associated with immediate continence after RRP. Moreover, patients who were immediately continent had a 3.6-fold probability to be potent within 12 months.

Novel uroflow stop test at time of catheter removal is a strong predictor of early urinary continence recovery following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a pilot study

AIM

To study whether the ability to completely stop urinary flow during voiding at time of catheter removal, measured objectively using uroflowmetry, can predict early recovery of urine continence following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this pilot study, 108 patients with a minimum of 2 years follow-up, operated by a single surgeon (AEH) were subjected to an uroflowmetry at the time of urethral catheter removal following RARP. Normal Saline (150 ml) was instilled intravesically prior to catheter removal and patients were instructed to attempt to stop urine flow during voiding in uroflowmeter. Two groups were studied, group one with positive Stop Test (n = 80) and group two with negative Stop Test (n = 28). Covariates included age, BMI, IPSS score, PSA, tumor stage, prostate volume, nerve sparing status, and estimated blood loss.

RESULTS

Basic characteristics were not statistically different between both groups. Early continence recovery was significantly higher in group one. Pad-free continence rates in group one and two at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months were 62% vs. 7% (P < 0.001), 85% vs. 28% (P < 0.001), 93% vs. 67% (P 0.001), 93% vs. 82% (P 0.079), 97% vs. 82% (P 0.006), and 97% vs. 85% (P 0.023), respectively. Uroflow Stop Test was the only independent predictor of early urine continence recovery on univariate and multivariate regression analysis [OR 2.87 (95%CI 1.34-4.38, P = < 0.001)].

CONCLUSION

Novel use of uroflowmetry at time of urethral catheter removal is a simple, non-invasive study with independent ability to predict early continence recovery following RARP.

Preserving continence during robotic prostatectomy

Preservation of postoperative urinary continence remains the primary concern of all men and their surgeons following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Without doubt, continence is the most important quality of life issue following radical prostatectomy. Identification of difficulties and lessons learned over time has helped focus efforts in order to improve urinary quality of life and continence. This review will examine definitions of continence and urinary quality of life evaluation, technical aspects and the impact of patient-related factors affecting time to and overall continence.

Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy after the first decade: surgical evolution or new paradigm

Early studies indicate that robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has promising short-term outcomes; however, RARP is beyond its infancy, and the long-term report cards are now beginning. The important paradigm shift introduced by RARP is the reevaluation of the entire open radical prostatectomy experience in surgical technique by minimizing blood loss and complications, maximizing cancer free outcomes, and a renewed assault in preserving quality of life outcomes by many novel mechanisms. RARP provides a new technical “canvas” for surgical masters to create upon, and in ten years, has reinvigorated a 100-year-old “gold standard” surgery.

Simple method to predict return of continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

After removal of the Foley catheter after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), recovery of continence can take days to months. We sought to identify a simple means to predict time to recovery of postoperative continence.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Preoperative characteristics on 172 men who were undergoing RARP were entered into an electronic database. All men were queried via telephone and/or returned a 7-day log of pad use. Men without need for pads were excluded (n=41). At 4 to 7 days, responses were grouped as: one pad (n=55), two pads (n=35), or three or more pads (n=41). Patients returned self-addressed postcards noting the date of 0-pad urinary status. Univariate and multivariate analysis of variables were assessed for ability to predict time to continence.

RESULTS

No preoperative factors, such as age, International Index of Erectile Function-5, prostate-specific antigen level, American Urological Association symptom score, body mass index, uroflowmetry, nerve-sparing status, estimated blood loss, or prostate weight, were found to predict time to continence. Pad use at 4 to 7 days, however, was highly correlated with median time to continence. The median time to continence for men using one pad was 35 days, two pads was 42 days, and for three or more pads was 73 days (P=0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

As has been previously reported, we found no reliable baseline factors that predicted postoperative time to 0-pad continence. We did find that determining pad usage at 4 to 7 days after catheter removal strongly predicted time to pad-free continence. This method is simpler then pad weights, predicts high- and low-risk men for delayed continence, and can be used for counseling/intervention.

[Satisfaction analysis in men presenting with localized prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy: psychological and social aspects]

OBJECTIVE

Analyze the treatment satisfaction and impact on patients with localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

One-hundred and eighty patients, with mean age of 60 years, were divided into three groups: group I--100 patients submitted to radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP), group II--40 patients who underwent radiotherapy (RT), and group III--40 healthy men. A questionnaire was applied to the groups to assess physical and psychological changes 18 months after treatment. The investigational tool was based on two questionnaires; first: SF-36 (Short Form Health Survey), second: FACT-P (Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy).

RESULTS

In group I, 70% never used pads, 5% presented with complete urinary incontinence, and 10% reported occasional stool leakage. In group II, 85% did not use pads and 5% reported two pads a day; 15% reported stool leakage or intestinal cramps. Sexual dysfunction was similar in both groups: 75% of the surgical group and 72.5% of the radiotherapy group reported erectile dysfunction. In the control group, 40% reported erectile dysfunction; 10% reported occasional stool leakage and none had changes regarding the overall treatment-related satisfaction. Seventy-eight percent of the RRP group and 77.5% of the RT group reported being happy respecting satisfaction with the accepted or chosen treatment, and affirmed that would choose it again.

CONCLUSIONS

The assessment of treatment-related satisfaction determines the treatment tolerability. This study's results did not show any significant changes in this issue between both treatment modalities (p>0.05).

Time to Return to Work and Physical Activity Following Open Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy

PURPOSE

We identified factors that predict return to part-time and full-time work and resumption of unlimited physical activity following open radical retropubic prostatectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between July 1, 2002 and February 28, 2005, 537 men with clinically localized prostate cancer underwent open radical retropubic prostatectomy, as performed by a single surgeon. Intraoperative, perioperative and postoperative parameters were recorded in real time and entered into a database. An assessment was made 1 and 3 months postoperatively regarding time to return to work and unrestricted physical activity.

RESULTS

Of the men 50% returned to part-time and full-time work, and unrestricted activity within 14, 21 and 30 days after discharge home, respectively. Patient age and hematocrit at hospital discharge significantly predicted return to part-time and full-time work, and unlimited physical activity. The number of days that the urinary catheter was indwelling was also associated with return to part-time work. Occupation (blue vs white collar) and marital status were also associated with return to full-time work. In the multivariate model a unit increase in hematocrit decreased the time to return to part-time and full-time work, and unrestricted physical activity by 0.50, 0.60 and 0.59 days, respectively. Men with discharge hematocrit greater than 32% were 1.57 (p = 0.059), 1.65 (p = 0.041) and 2.03 (p = 0.002) times more likely to return to part-time and full-time work, and unlimited activity before 14, 21 and 30 days, respectively. Overall models were developed that accounted for 9.4%, 14.0% and 4.0% of the time to return to part-time work, full-time work and unrestricted physical activity, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Efforts to increase discharge hematocrit by minimizing intraoperative blood loss or using preoperative blood management strategies and earlier removal of the urinary catheter have a favorable impact on the return to work and physical activity.

The benefits of radical prostatectomy beyond cancer control in symptomatic men with prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and the symptom-associated quality of life (QoL) after radical prostatectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We carried out a prospective study (January 1999 to March 2001) of 50 consecutive men initially assessed in the nurse-led prostate assessment clinic for their LUTS and subsequently diagnosed to have localized prostate cancer. They had a radical retropubic prostatectomy and were assessed before, 3 and 6 months after surgery with a self-administered International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and QoL questionnaires, and measurements of urinary flow rate and postvoid residual urinary (PVR) volumes. Finally, each patient completed a self-administered continence questionnaire at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS

In men with moderate to severe LUTS before surgery there were significant improvements in total IPSS, symptom-associated QoL, mean peak flow rate and PVR (P < 0.05). However, in eight men with mild LUTS, although there was a 33% improvement in the total symptom score, it was not statistically significant. Thirty-eight patients reported complete continence, nine had infrequent stress leaks only on heavy physical activity, and the remaining three used < 2 pads/day for protection before heavy physical activity at 3 months after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Radical prostatectomy provides major benefits to men with LUTS besides cancer control. These data are important in counselling patients about the treatment options, especially in view of the current enthusiasm for brachytherapy and conformal radiotherapy, which may worsen LUTS.

Practical considerations in radical retropubic prostatectomy

Overall, in the hands of an experienced surgeon, the outcomes following radical prostatectomy are excellent. Attention to patient selection, preoperative management, surgical technique, and postoperative management are essential factors contributing to favorable outcomes for men with a biologically significant cancer and 10-year life expectancy. For these men, radical prostatectomy represents the optimal management based on cure, morbidity, and quality of life.

Analysis of apical soft tissue margins during radical retropubic prostatectomy

PURPOSE

We determine the use of information gained with intraoperative biopsy and frozen section analysis of the apical soft tissue margin during nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A separate 2 to 3 mm. circumferential biopsy was obtained from the apical soft tissue margin, and was sent for frozen and permanent section analysis during radical retropubic prostatectomy in 95 men with clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate. A single pathologist examined the surgical and apical soft tissue margin specimens for evidence and extent of benign or malignant prostate tissue. Urinary continence was evaluated at catheter removal and 3 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Of the patients 26% had positive surgical margins, of which 64% were positive apical margins. Permanent section of the apical soft tissue biopsy revealed no prostate in 39%, benign prostate in 54% and prostate cancer in 7% of patients. Because of the frozen section finding of adenocarcinoma in 3 patients, the apical soft tissue margin was further resected until the specimen was negative for malignancy. The apical soft tissue margin was the only positive margin site in 2 of these 3 patients. Positive surgical and apical margins, and percent tumor volumes greater than 26% on prostatectomy specimen had a significantly higher likelihood for positive apical soft tissue margins. The pathological finding of a positive apical margin on the surgical specimen had sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 57%, 86%, 25% and 96%, respectively, for detecting prostate cancer on the apical soft tissue biopsy. Of the apical soft tissue biopsies 54% contained an element of benign prostatic tissue, although 92% of them contained benign tissue in less than 25% of the total specimen. Mean continence score in the men with and those without benign prostate tissue on apical soft tissue biopsy was 15.6 and 14.4, respectively (p = 0.15). The percent of men who required no protective pads for urinary continence at 3 months was 53% and 65% for those who had no prostate and those who had benign prostate tissue, respectively, in the apical soft tissue margin.

CONCLUSIONS

Excising and submitting an additional 2 to 3 mm. of apical soft tissue margin for permanent section analysis after prostate removal during radical prostatectomy represent an effective method for decreasing residual prostate tissue. Attempts at maximizing urethral length when dividing the prostato-urethral junction likely increases the chance of leaving residual prostate without improving continence.

Predicting continence following radical prostatectomy

Stress urinary incontinence is a recognized complication following radical prostatectomy. Fortunately, in the hands of experienced surgeons, the overwhelming majority of men ultimately regain urinary continence following the procedure. Most men regain urinary continence 3 to 12 months after the prostatectomy. We have developed and validated a continence index that is administered at the time of catheter removal after radical prostatectomy. This index identifies those men who rapidly regain continence and men who will have permanent incontinence after prostatectomy. The study population was stratified into tertile groups based on the continence scores. At 3 months, 96%, 82%, and 68% of men in the highest, mid, and lowest tertile groups reported using no pads or one small pad. Based on these observations, we recommend initiating biofeedback immediately postoperatively in men with continence scores of 14 or less. At 1 year, 100%, 98%, and 87% of the men in the highest, mid, and lowest tertile group reported using no pads or only one small pad. Men who have continence scores greater than 14 can be assured that they will regain urinary continence within 1 year. To our knowledge, this index is the only validated instrument that predicts the return of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy.