Radical retropubic prostatectomy: bladder neck preservation versus reconstruction

Bladder neck size and its association with urinary continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

Objectives

This study aims to determine whether bladder neck size (BNS) measured during surgery is associated with urinary continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Patients and Methods

Between June 2015 and March 2019, 365 consecutive eligible patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy were enrolled into a prospective observational cohort study. The primary outcome was patient-reported urinary continence status at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively, with continence defined as 0 pad/day. The primary exposure was BNS (largest diameter) measured intraoperatively just before performance of vesicourethral anastomosis. Other covariates included age, body mass index, NCCN risk category, nerve-sparing, membranous urethral length measured intraoperatively and weight of the resected specimen.

Results

Well-preserved neurovascular bundle (bilateral/unilateral/none) was highly correlated with urinary continence status at every point after surgery. No difference could be seen between the group with BNS ≤17 mm and the >17-mm group at 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery, but there was better urinary rate of continence in narrow BNS group (≤17 mm) at 12 and 24 months after surgery. Multivariate analysis showed both nerve sparing and bladder neck diameter to be independent factors affecting urinary continence at 12 and 24 months after surgery.

Conclusion

Preservation of neurovascular bundles was associated with better urinary continence after surgery. Smaller BNS was associated with better urinary continence in late stages after surgery (12-24 months after surgery).

Modified hood technique for single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy contributes to early recovery of continence

Background and purpose

Urinary incontinence is one of the common side effects of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Here, we described the modified Hood technique for single-port RARP (sp-RARP) and assessed the interest of this new technique for early continence recovery.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 24 patients who underwent sp-RARP modified hood technique from June 2021 to December 2021. The pre-and intraoperative variables, postoperative functional and oncological outcomes of patients were collected and analyzed. The continence rates were estimated at 0 day, 1 week, 4 weeks, 3 months and 12 months after catheter removal. Continence was defined as wearing no pad over a 24 h period.

Results

Mean time of operation and estimated blood loss were 183 min and 170 ml, respectively. The postoperative continence rates at 0 day, 1 week, 4 weeks, 3 months and 12 months after catheter removal were 41.7%, 54.2%, 75.0%, 91.7% and 95.8%, respectively. There were two patients who detected positive surgical margins and no patients observed complications requiring further treatment.

Conclusion

The modified hood technique is a safe and feasible method that provides better outcomes in terms of early return of continence, without increasing estimated blood loss and compromising oncologic outcomes.

Clinicopathological Significances of Positive Surgical Resection Margin after Radical Prostatectomy for Prostatic Cancers: A Meta-Analysis

Background and Objectives: This study aims to elucidate the positive rate and the clinicopathological significance of surgical margin after radical prostatectomy (RP) through a meta-analysis. Materials and Methods: This meta-analysis finally used 59 studies, including the information about the positive surgical margin (PSM) and those clinicopathological significances after RP. The subgroup analysis for the estimated rates of PSM was evaluated based on types of surgery, grade groups, and pathological tumor (pT) stages. We compared the clinicopathological correlations between positive and negative surgical margins (NSM). Results: The estimated PSM rate was 25.3% after RP (95% confidence interval [CI] 21.9-29.0%). The PSM rates were 26.0% (95% CI 21.5-31.1%) 28.0% (95% CI 20.2-37.5%) in robot-assisted RP and nerve-sparing RP, respectively. The PSM rate was significantly higher in high-grade groups than in low-grade groups. In addition, the higher pT stage subgroup had a high PSM rate compared to the lower pT stage subgroups. Patients with PSM showed significantly high PSA levels, frequent lymphovascular invasion, lymph node metastasis, and extraprostatic extension. Biochemical recurrences (BCRs) were 28.5% (95% CI 21.4-36.9%) and 11.8% (95% CI 8.1-16.9%) in PSM and NSM subgroups, respectively. Patients with PSM showed worse BCR-free survival than those with NSM (hazard ratio 2.368, 95% CI 2.043-2.744%). Conclusions: Our results showed that PSM was significantly correlated with worse clinicopathological characteristics and biochemical recurrence-free survival. Among the results in preoperative evaluations, grade group and tumor stage are useful for the prediction of PSM.

Effect of Bladder Neck Preservation on Long-Term Urinary Continence after Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of bladder neck preservation (BNP) on long-term urinary continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to identify studies that assessed the difference in urinary continence and oncologic outcomes between patients who underwent RALP with BNP and those who underwent RALP without BNP. Four trials (1880 cases with BNP, 727 controls without BNP) were considered suitable for meta-analysis. BNP was associated with significantly better urinary continence outcomes at 3–4 months (odds ratio (OR), 2.88; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.52–5.48; p = 0.001), 12 months (OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.10–3.74; p = 0.02), and 24 months (OR, 3.23; 95% CI, 1.13–9.20; p = 0.03) after RALP. There was no difference in the rate of overall positive surgical margin (PSM) (OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.72–1.39; p = 0.99) and that of PSM at the prostate base (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.21–1.13; p = 0.09) between the two groups. The BNP technique during RALP leads to early return of urinary continence and long-term urinary continence without compromising the oncologic outcomes.

Effect of bladder neck sparing at robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy on postoperative continence rates and biochemical recurrence

OBJECTIVES

Previous studies reported improved continence recovery by bladder neck sparing (BNS) in prostate cancer patients treated with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP), without compromising biochemical recurrence (BCR). We compared the continence outcomes, surgical margin rates, and BCR risk of BNS vs. bladder neck reconstruction (BNR) patients during RALP.

METHODS

Overall, 1,512 patients who underwent RALP with BNS or BNR between 2010 and 2017 in a single high-volume center, were identified. Logistic regression models tested the effect of BNS on continence and surgical margin rates. Cox regression models tested the effect of BNS on BCR. Continence was defined as the use of 0 or 1-safety pad per day.

RESULTS

Three hundred and eighty-two vs. 1,130 patients underwent BNS vs. BNR. The median time to catheter removal was significantly shorter (5 vs. 8 days) in patients with BNS. Pad-free rates at 7 days after catheter removal were 60.0% vs. 54.5%, continence rates were 80.1% vs. 78.3% after 3 months and 85.3% vs. 89.6% after 1 year for BNS and BNR, respectively. Multivariable models revealed that BNS is an independent predictor to be pad-free at 7 days after catheter removal (OR: 1.39, P = 0.04), but no predictor for continence at 3 months (OR: 1.02, P = 0.9) and 1 year (OR: 0.78, P = 0.4) after RALP, as well as for positive surgical margin (OR: 0.95, P = 0.8) and BCR (Hazard ratio: 0.95, P = 0.9).

CONCLUSION

Patients with BNS had a better chance to be pad-free at 7 days after catheter removal and had a significant shorter time to catheter removal. However, this beneficial effect disappeared with time and no differences in continence rates at 3 months and 1 year were recorded. Moreover, BNS did not negatively affect positive margin or BCR rates.

Post-radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence: is there any discrepancy between medical reports and patients' perceptions?

Background

Post-radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPI) negatively affects the quality of life of patients. Accurate identification of the problem by physicians is essential for adequate postoperative management. In this study we sought to access whether there is, for urinary incontinence, any discrepancy between medical reports and the perception of patients.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of medical records of 337 patients subjected to radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) between 2005 and 2010. Sociodemographic variables were collected, as well as continence status over the course of treatment. Next, we contacted patients by phone to determine continence status at present and at time of their last appointment, as well as to apply ICIQ – SF questionnaire. Poisson regression model with robust variance was used to estimate the factors associated with discrepancy, using the stepwise backward strategy. Software used was Stata® (StataCorp, LC) version 11.0.

Results

There is discrepancy between medical reports and patients’ perceptions in 42.2% of cases. This discrepancy was found in 56% of elderly patients and 52% of men with low schooling, with statistical significance in these groups (p = 0.069 and 0.0001, respectively), whereas in multivariate regression analysis the discrepancy rate was significantly higher in black men (discrepancy rate of 52.6%) with low schooling (p = 0.004 and 0.043, respectively).

Conclusion

There is discrepancy between medical reports and the perception of black men with low schooling in respect to post-radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence and a need for more thorough investigation of this condition in patients that fit this risk profile.

Anatomical, surgical and technical factors influencing continence after radical prostatectomy

Radical prostatectomy (RP) is the most frequent treatment with curative intent performed for prostate cancer to date. Different surgical approaches (perineal, transperitoneal, and extraperitoneal) and techniques (laparoscopic and robot assisted) have been described to increase the efficiency and potentially diminish the postoperative complications of this procedure. The aim of this narrative review is to investigate and define the factors that influence postprostatectomy urinary continence. We highlighted the anatomical landmarks and the modifications of surgical techniques aimed at improving the continence rates and thus, patient quality of life. After RP, the long-term continence rates range from 84% to 97%. In order to achieve good continence rates, a careful dissection along with meticulous anatomical reconstruction is required. To this end, a detailed knowledge of the periprostatic anatomy is mandatory.

Bladder neck preservation improves time to continence after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Bladder neck preservation (BNP) during radical prostatectomy (RP) may improve postoperative urinary continence, although its overall effectiveness remains controversial. We systematically searched PubMed, Ovid Medline, Embase, CBM and the Cochrane Library to identify studies published before February 2016 that assessed associations between BNP and post-RP urinary continence. Thirteen trials (1130 cases and 1154 controls) assessing BNP versus noBNP (or with bladder neck reconstruction, BNR) were considered suitable for meta-analysis, including two randomized controlled trials (RCT), six prospective and five retrospective studies. Meta-analysis demonstrated that BNP improved early urinary continence rates (6 mo, OR = 1.66; 95% CI, 1.21–2.27; P = 0.001) and long-term urinary continence outcomes (>12 mo, OR = 3.99; 95% CI, 1.94–8.21; P = 0.0002). Patients with BNP also had lower bladder neck stricture frequencies (OR = 0.49; 95% CI, 0.29–0.81; P = 0.006). Anastomotic leak rates, positive surgical margins and biochemical failure rates were comparable between the two groups (P>0.05). There were no differences in baseline characteristics except for a smaller average prostate volume (WMD = −2.24 ml; 95% CI, -4.27 to -0.22; P = 0.03) in BNP patients. Our analyses indicated that BNP during RP improved early recovery and overall long-term (1 year) urinary continence and decreased bladder neck stricture rates without compromising oncologic control.

Systematic Review of Studies Reporting Positive Surgical Margins After Bladder Neck Sparing Radical Prostatectomy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Bladder neck preservation (BNP) during radical prostatectomy (RP) has been proposed as a method to improve early recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. However, there is concern over a possible increase in the risk of positive surgical margins and prostate cancer recurrence rate. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis reported improved early recovery and overall long-term urinary continence without compromising oncologic control. The aim of our study was to perform a critical review of the literature to assess the impact on bladder neck and base margins after bladder neck sparing radical prostatectomy.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We carried out a systematic review of the literature using Pubmed, Scopus and Cochrane library databases in May 2017 using medical subject headings and free-text protocol according to PRISMA guidelines. We used the following search terms: bladder neck preservation, prostate cancer, radical prostatectomy and surgical margins. Studies focusing on positive surgical margins (PSM) in bladder neck sparing RP pertinent to the objective of this review were included.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Overall, we found 15 relevant studies reporting overall and site-specific positive surgical margins rate after bladder neck sparing radical prostatectomy. This included two RCTs, seven prospective comparative studies, two retrospective comparative studies and four case series. All studies were published between 1993 and 2015 with sample sizes ranging between 50 and 1067. Surgical approaches included open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. The overall and base-specific PSM rates ranged between 7-36% and 0-16.3%, respectively. Mean base PSM was 4.9% in those patients where bladder neck sparing was performed, but only 1.85% in those without sparing. Bladder neck preservation during radical prostatectomy may increase base-positive margins. Further studies are needed to better investigate the impact of this technique on oncological outcomes. A future paradigm could include modification of intended approach to bladder neck dissection when anterior base lesions are identified on pre-operative MRI.

The Null Effect of Bladder Neck Size on Incontinence Outcomes after Radical Prostatectomy

PURPOSE

We sought to determine whether bladder neck size is associated with incontinence scores after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive eligible patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy between July 19 and December 28, 2016 were enrolled in a prospective, longitudinal, observational cohort study. The primary outcome was patient reported urinary incontinence on the EPIC (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite) scale 6 and 12 weeks postoperatively. The relationship between the EPIC score of urinary incontinence and bladder neck size was evaluated by multiple regression. Predicted EPIC scores for incontinence were displayed graphically after using restricted cubic splines to model bladder neck size.

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients were enrolled. The response rate was 98% and 87% at 6 and 12 weeks, respectively. Bladder neck size was not significantly associated with incontinence scores at 6 and 12 weeks. Comparing the 90th percentile for bladder neck size (18 mm) with the 10th percentile (7 mm) revealed no significant difference in adjusted EPIC scores for incontinence at 6 weeks (β coefficient 0.88, 95% CI -10.92-12.68, p = 0.88) or at 12 weeks (β coefficient 5.80, 95% CI -7.36-18.97, p = 0.39).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings question the merit of creating an extremely small bladder neck during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. We contend that doing so increases the risk of positive margins at the bladder neck without facilitating early recovery of continence.

[Functional results and treatment of functional dysfunctions after radical prostatectomy]

OBJECTIVE

To describe the functional results and treatment of functional dysfunctions after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Bibliography search was performed from the database Medline (National Library of Medicine, Pubmed) selected according to the scientific relevance. The research was focused on continence, potency, les dyserections, couple sexuality, incontinence, treatments of postoperative incontinence, dysrection and trifecta.

RESULTS

Radical prostatectomy is an elaborate and challenging procedure when carcinological risk balances with functional results. Despite recent developments in surgical techniques, post-radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence (pRP-UI) continues to be one of the most devastating complications, which affects 9-16% of patients. Sphincter injury and bladder dysfunction are the most common causes or pRP-UI. The assessment of severity of pRP-UI that affects the choice of treatment is still not well standardized but should include at least a pad test and self-administered questionnaires. The implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter AMS800 remains the gold standard treatment for patients with moderate to severe pRP-UI. The development of less invasive techniques such as the male sling of Pro-ACT balloons has provided alternative therapeutic options for moderate and slight forms of pRP-UI. Most groups now consider the bulbo-urethral compressive sling as the treatment of choice for patients with non-severe pRP-UI. The most appropriate second-line therapeutic strategy is not clearly determined. Recent therapies such as adjustable artificial urinary sphincters and sling and stem cells injections have been investigated. Maintenance of a satisfying sex life is a major concern of a majority of men facing prostate cancer and its treatments. It is essential to assess the couple's sexuality before treating prostate cancer in order to deliver comprehensive information and consider early therapeutic solutions adapted to the couple's expectations. Active pharmacological erectile rehabilitation (intracavernous injections or phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors [PDE5i] on demand, during in the month following surgery) or passive (daily PDE5i after surgery) might improve the quality of erections especially in response to PDE5i. Unimpaired aspects of sexual response (orgasm) may, when the erection is not yet recovered, represent an alternative allowing the couple to preserve intimacy and complicity. Androgen blockade is a major barrier to maintain or return to a satisfying sex. Trifecta is a simple tool to present in one way the results of radical prostatectomy: in case of bilateral neurovascular preservation, Trifecta is 60% whatever the surgical approach.

CONCLUSION

Radical prostatectomy is an elaborate and challenging procedure when carcinological risk balances with functional results. Various treatments of postoperative incontinence and dysrections exist. Functional disorders after surgery have to be treated to ameliorate quality of life of patients.

A new technique of bladder neck reconstruction during radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer

Purpose:

To evaluate continence after radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer patients, in whom a new method of the bladder neck reconstruction (BNR) using deep dorsal stitch was implemented (deep single stitch through all bladder layers directly dorsal to the bladder opening after “tennis racket” reconstruction) and to provide justification for its use by means of anatomical study in cadavers.

Material and Methods:

Open radical retropubic prostatectomy was performed in 84 patients: 39 patients with a new BNR method used to improve continence and control group of 45 patients with standard “tennis racket” BNR. Median follow-up was 14 months in control group and 12 months in study group. Continence recovery was accessed early postoperatively and every 3 months thereafter. Anatomical study was performed on 2 male fresh cadavers reproducing two different BNR techniques to clarify any underlying continence related mechanisms.

Results:

Patients with new BNR achieved full continence significantly faster (p=0.041), but the continence rates after 12 months were similar between groups. The severity of incontinence up to month 9 was significantly reduced in BNR group. The anastomotic stricture rate was not affected. Applying new BNR to the cadaver model revealed effects on early continence, namely presence of proximal passive closure mechanism in area of bladder neck.

Conclusions:

Continence in patients with the new BNR method using deep dorsal stitch recovered significantly faster. Moreover, a reduced grade of residual incontinence was documented. The effect was non-significant at month 12 of follow-up, meaning that only early effect was present.

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with bladder neck preservation: positive surgical margin and urinary continence status

INTRODUCTION

Preservation of the bladder neck (BN) has been controversial, as limited excision of the bladder neck may result in incomplete resection of the disease. Moreover, the urinary continence rate may not be improved.

AIM

To evaluate the effect of bladder neck sparing on urinary continence, and surgical margins status in prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with laparoscopic radical extraperitoneal prostatectomy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 295 consecutive patients who had undergone laparoscopic radical extraperitoneal prostatectomy for clinically localised prostate cancer in a single institution was performed. Positive surgical margin (SM(+)) and urinary continence status at 3, 6, and 12 months were evaluated.

RESULTS

The distribution of SM(+) for pT2, pT3, and pT4a was 15.3% (27/176), 49.1% (58/118), and 100% (1/1), respectively. Overall, there were 55.61%, 80.61%, and 84.69% of men continent at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. However, when limiting the analysis to those who did not receive adjuvant radiotherapy within 12 months following surgery, urinary continence rates were 59.23%, 85.86%, and 90.21% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and pathological T stage were identified as significant predictors of positive surgical margins.

CONCLUSIONS

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic radical extraperitoneal prostatectomy with bladder neck preservation has been a safe procedure which has resulted in good functional outcome. We observed a relatively high incidence of positive surgical margins which could be attributed to a large number of extracapsular disease cases.

Preservation of the internal vesical sphincter and proximal urethra during retropubic radical prostatectomy may improve earlier recovery of continence in selected patients

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the influence of preservation of the muscular internal sphincter and proximal urethra on continence recovery after radical prostatectomy (RP).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifty-five consecutive patients with organ confined prostate cancer were submitted to RP with the preservation of muscular internal sphincter and the proximal urethra (group 1) and compared to 55 patients submitted to standard procedure (group 2). Continence rates were assessed using a self-administrated questionnaire at 3, 7, 30 days and 3, 12 months after removal of the catheter.

RESULTS

Group 1 had a faster recovery of continence than group 2 at 3 days (50.9% vs. 25.5%; P=.005), at 7 days (78.2% vs. 58.2%; P=.020), at 30 days (80.0% vs. 61.8%; P=.029) and at 3 months (81.8% vs. 61.8%; P=.017); there were no statistically difference in terms of continence at 12 months among the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of continence showed that surgical technique was significantly associated with earlier time to continence at 3 and 7 days. The two groups had no significant differences in terms of surgical margins.

CONCLUSIONS

Our modified technique of RP with preservation of smooth muscular internal sphincter as well as of the proximal urethra during bladder neck dissection resulted in significant increased early urinary continence at 3, 7, 30 days and 3 months after catheter removal. The technique does not increase the rate of positive margins and the duration of the procedure.

Bladder neck sparing in radical prostatectomy

The role of a bladder neck sparing (BNS) technique in radical prostatectomy (RP) remains controversial. The potential advantages of improved functional recovery must be weighed against oncological outcomes. We performed a literature review to evaluate the current knowledge regarding oncological and functional outcomes of BNS and bladder neck reconstruction (BNr) in RP. A systematic literature review using on-line medical databases was performed. A total of 33 papers were identified evaluating the use of BNS in open, laparoscopic and robotic-assisted RP. The majority were retrospective case series, with only one prospective, randomised, blinded study identified. The majority of papers reported no significant difference in oncological outcomes using a BNS or BNr technique, regardless of the surgical technique employed. Quoted positive surgical margin rates ranged from 6% to 32%. Early urinary continence (UC) rates were ranged from 36% to 100% at 1 month, with long-term UC rate reported at 84-100% at 12 months if the bladder neck (BN) was spared. BNS has been shown to improve early return of UC and long-term UC without compromising oncological outcomes. Anastomotic stricture rate is also lower when using a BNS technique.

Preservation of the smooth muscular internal (vesical) sphincter and of the proximal urethra for the early recovery of urinary continence after retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective case-control study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the influence of preservation of the muscular internal sphincter and proximal urethra on continence recovery after radical prostatectomy.

METHODS

This was a prospective single-center, case-control study. A total of 40 consecutive patients with organ-confined prostate cancer were submitted to radical prostatectomy with the preservation of the muscular internal sphincter and the proximal urethra (group 1), and their outcomes were compared with those of 40 patients submitted to a standard procedure (group 2). Continence rates were assessed using a self-administrated questionnaire at 3, 7 and 30 days, and 3 and 12 months after removal of the catheter.

RESULTS

Group 1 had a faster recovery of early continence than group 2 at day 3 (45% vs 22%; P = 0.029) and at day 7 (75% vs 50%; P = 0.018). Considering the number of pads, group 1 had a faster recovery of continence at 3, 7 and 30 days, and also had less incidence of severe incontinence. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of continence at 3 and 12 months among the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that surgical technique and young age were significantly associated with earlier time to continence at 3 and 7 days. The two groups had no significant differences in terms of surgical margins.

CONCLUSIONS

Our modified technique of radical retropubic prostatectomy with preservation of the smooth muscular internal sphincter, as well as of the proximal urethra during bladder neck dissection, results in a significantly increased urinary continence at 3, 7 and 30 days after catheter removal, with a minor incidence of severe incontinence. The technique is also oncologically safe, and it does not increase the operative duration of the procedure.

Management of Localized Prostate Cancer by Focal Transurethral Resection of Prostate Cancer: An Application of Radical TUR-PCa to Focal Therapy

Background. We analyzed radical TUR-PCa against localized prostate cancer. Patients and Methods. Seventy-nine out of 209 patients with prostate cancer in one lobe were studied. Patients' age ranged from 58 to 91 years and preoperative PSA, 0.70 to 17.30 ng/mL. In other 16 additional patients we performed focal TUR-PCa. Patients' age ranged from 51 to 87 years and preoperative PSA, 1.51 to 25.74 ng/mL. Results. PSA failure in radical TUR-PCa was 5.1% during the mean follow-up period of 58.9 months. The actuarial biochemical non-recurrence rate was 98.2% for pT2a and 90.5% for pT2b. Bladder neck contracture occurred in 28 patients (35.4%). In 209 patients, pathological study revealed prostate cancer of the peripheral zone near the neurovascular bundle bilaterally in 25%, unilaterally in 39% and no cancer bilaterally in 35%, suggesting the possibility of focal TUR-PCa. Postoperative PSA of 16 patients treated by focal TUR-PCa was stable between 0.007 and 0.406 ng/mL at 24.2 months' follow-up. No patients suffered from urinary incontinence. Bladder neck contracture developed in only 1 patient and all 5 patients underwent nerve-preserving TUR-PCa did not show erectile dysfunction. Conclusion. Focal TUR-PCa was considered to be a promising option among focal therapies against localized prostate cancer.

The impact of bladder neck mucosal eversion during open radical prostatectomy on bladder neck stricture and urinary extravasation

PURPOSE

To determine whether the bladder neck mucosal eversion (BNM-eversion) during radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) reduces the risk of bladder neck stricture (BNS) and of peri-anastomotic extravasation (PAE) in postoperative cystography.

METHODS

Two hundred and eleven patients with clinically localized prostate cancer underwent RRP and were prospectively randomized into patients with BNM-eversion (group I) and without BNM-eversion (group II). All patients underwent an evaluation of PAE by retrograde cystography on postoperative day 8. We assessed BNS after 6 months.

RESULTS

Ninety-two patients with and 113 patients without BNM-eversion were included. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics, including age, TNM-classification, Gleason score, PSA, prostate volume, and blood loss in both groups. A complete follow-up of 6 months for BNS was available for 188 patients (89.1 %). Sixteen BNS out of 188 patients were recorded, 4.7 % (n = 4) in group I and 11.7 % (n = 12) in group II (p = 0.09). Data from 205 out of 211 patients were available for the evaluation of the extravasation by cystography. Peri-anastomotic extravasation was detectable in 11.96 %, (11/205) in group I and in 21.24 % (24/205) in group II (p = 0.08).

CONCLUSION

BNM-eversion does not have a positive influence on the prevention of bladder neck strictures. Peri-anastomotic extravasation detected by cystography does not correlate with a formation of bladder neck stricture.

Influence of bladder neck suspension stitches on early continence after radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized study of 180 patients

Several techniques have been introduced to improve early postoperative continence. In this study, we evaluated the impact of bladder neck (vesicourethral anastomosis) suspension on the outcome of extraperitoneal endoscopic radical prostatectomy (EERPE). In this research, a total of 180 patients underwent EERPE. Group 1 included patients who underwent nerve-sparing EERPE (nsEERPE) (n=45), and Group 2 included patients who underwent nsEERPE with bladder neck suspension (BNS, n=45). Groups 3 (n=45) and 4 (n=45) included patients who received EERPE and EERPE with BNS, respectively. Patients were randomly assigned to receive BNS with their nsEERPE or EERPE procedure. Perioperative parameters were recorded, and continence was evaluated by determining the number and weight of absorbent pads (pad weighing test) on the second day after catheter removal and by a questionnaire 3 months postoperatively. Two days after catheter removal, 11.1% of Group 1, 11.1% of Group 2, 4.4% of Group 3 and 8.9% of Group 4 were continent. The average urine loss was 80.4, 70.1, 325.0 and 291.3 g for the each of these groups, respectively. At 3 months, 76.5% of Group 1 and 81.3% of Group 2 were continent. The continence figures for Group 3 and 4 were 48.5% and 43.8%, respectively. Similar overall rates were observed in all groups. In conclusion, although there are controversial reports in the literature, early continence was never observed to be significantly higher in the BNS groups when compared with the non-BNS groups, regardless of the EERPE technique performed.

[Prevention of postoperative urinary stress incontinence]

Postoperative stress incontinence following operative treatment of prostate cancer represents a considerable percentage of overall male incontinence. Postoperative incontinence following radical prostatectomy ranges between 2.9 and 87% depending on author and patient characteristics. Especially patient-related factors such as body mass index, age, size of prostate, preoperative incontinence, and concomitant diseases as well as classification of incontinence and modality of data collection influence postoperative continence rates. However, recent publications demonstrate the important impact of different operative techniques with regard to postoperative continence.The preservation of the muscular urethral sphincter is of particular importance. Nevertheless, the preservation of further anatomical structures contributes to postoperative continence. Preservation of bladder neck, nerve sparing, and reconstruction of the vesicourethral junction are operative techniques to prevent postoperative incontinence. In the last decade different modifications of the operative technique have been investigated regarding specific effects on postoperative continence. The interpretation of these studies investigating these operative techniques showed improvement in early continence with shorter period of time to continence. Long-term follow-up revealed no significant advantages for these modifications with regard to continence compared to the standard procedure. To evaluate the long-term effects of certain modifications to prevent incontinence, randomized and well powered studies are necessary. It seems to be most likely that a combination of these preventive modifications will lead to improved postoperative continence rates.

[Conservative management of postoperative urinary incontinence in men]

Urinary incontinence in men most commonly occurs after radical prostatectomy. Of these patients, 3-23% remain incontinent a year after prostatectomy. Data on conservative therapy for postoperative incontinence is contradictory. Nonetheless, conservative treatment strategies must generally be attempted before any operative technique. Early pelvic floor muscle training with or without biofeedback therapy and duloxetine seem to have a positive effect on continence. Further randomised controlled studies are necessary to accurately assess other conservative therapeutic options such as extracorporeal magnetic innervation and electrical stimulation therapy.

Single center comparison of anastomotic strictures after radical perineal and radical retropubic prostatectomy

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the incidence and management of anastomotic strictures (ASs) after radical perineal prostatectomy (RPP) and retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) and to identify possible predisposing factors.

METHODS

Between 1997 and 2007, we performed 866 RPP and 2052 RRP for localized prostate cancer. Median follow-up was 52 months (12-136). We analyzed preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen, prostate size, clinical and pathologic tumor stage, neoadjuvant hormone deprivation, previous transurethral resection of the prostate, transfusion requirement, anastomotic insufficiency, and acute urinary retention (AUR) and its subsequent management to identify possible predisposing factors for AS formation.

RESULTS

The rate of AS after RPP and RRP was 3.8% (33/863) and 5.5% (113/2048), respectively (P = .067). In multivariate analysis, RRP was a statistically significant risk factor for AS (P = .0002). On survival analysis, the incidence of AS was lower for RPP as compared with RRP at median follow-up (P = .0229). Primary response to endoscopic AS incision or resection was 94% (31/33) and 72.6% (82/113) after RPP and RRP, respectively. On multivariate logistic regression analysis biopsy Gleason score, previous transurethral resection of the prostate, prostate volume, pathologic tumor stage and grade, transfusion requirement, AUR, and surgical technique were independent risk factors for the development of AS. An AS developed in 45.4% (20/44) and 10.9% (5/46) of the postoperative AUR cases treated with a suprapubic cystostomy tube and a transurethral Foley catheter, respectively (P <.05).

CONCLUSIONS

ASs occur more frequently after RRP in comparison with RPP. Primary endoscopic AS incision or resection are both highly successful. Treating postoperative AUR with a suprapubic cystostomy poses a high risk for AS formation and should be avoided.

Bladder neck contracture after radical retropubic prostatectomy using an intussuscepted vesico-urethral anastomosis: incidence with long-term follow-up

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the incidence of bladder neck contracture (BNC), a known complication of radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP), after a 9-year experience by one surgeon using a novel approach to lower urinary tract reconstruction, the intussuscepted vesico-urethral anastomosis (IVUA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

After institutional review board approval, the charts of 406 patients who had RRP for clinically localized prostate cancer from March 1998 to July 2007 were reviewed retrospectively. All patients had lower urinary tract reconstruction using the IVUA technique, which involves a looped urethral suture using six double-armed sutures that are drawn 'inside-to-out' from staggered points on the urethral stump through the bladder neck opening. When the sutures are tied down, the urethra is intussuscepted into the bladder neck opening.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 48 months, three patients developed BNC: one was at increased risk secondary to a previous TURP; one had his catheter removed on the second day after RRP in the presence of a suprapubic tube and developed a BNC at his 'dry' anastomosis; and one with no risk factors developed a BNC. Balloon dilatation, laser incision and self obturation were successful in stabilizing the strictures while preserving continence. Overall, the incidence of BNC in this series was three of 406 (0.74%).

CONCLUSIONS

IVUA gives a lower incidence of BNC over a long-term follow-up than rates cited in previous reports. IVUA is a valuable technique for lower urinary tract reconstruction in patients undergoing RRP.

Radical retropubic prostatectomy with running vesicourethral anastomosis and early catheter removal: our experience

OBJECTIVES

To assess the outcomes of patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) with a running vesicourethral anastomosis and catheter removal on postoperative day 3 or 5.

METHODS

From February 2006 through December 2007, 55 patients underwent RRP at our institution. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon using a running suture for the vesicourethral anastomosis. A cystogram was carried out before catheter removal in all patients. The initial 23 of 55 patients (Group 1; n = 23) had the cystogram on postoperative day 5, the other 32 patients (Group 2; n = 32) had the cystogram on postoperative day 3. Removal of the catheter was only carried out if there was no anastomotic extravasation.

RESULTS

The success rate of catheter removal in group 1 and 2 was 100% and 96.9%, respectively. Overall continence rates were 83.3%, 87% and 90.7% at 24, 48 and 72 h after removal of the catheter, respectively. There was no significant difference in terms of continence rate between groups 1 and 2. None of the patients had acute urinary retention and/or anastomotic stricture after catheter removal.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that an advanced running vesicourethral anastomosis during RRP is technically feasible, allowing safe early catheter removal in most patients.

Postprostatectomy incontinence: all about diagnosis and management

CONTEXT

The ever-increasing number of radical prostatectomies entails an increasing number of patients suffering from postprostatectomy stress incontinence despite improved surgical techniques. We provide an overview of the current diagnosis and treatment of postprostatectomy stress incontinence.

OBJECTIVE

To review previous and recent literature on this subject and to assess the current standards of diagnosis and management of postprostatectomy incontinence.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The PubMed database was searched, and all articles published since 2000 were evaluated.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

This review presents the current recommended diagnostic tools and available noninvasive and invasive treatment options.

CONCLUSIONS

The European Association of Urology (EAU) recommends a two-stage assessment for diagnosis of postprostatectomy incontinence. Noninvasive therapy, pelvic floor-muscle training and biofeedback, is recommended in early postoperative and mild incontinence. Pharmacological treatment with duloxetine is especially effective in combination with physiotherapy, where it synergistically improves the continence rate. For surgical treatment, the insertion of an artificial urinary sphincter, AS-800, is still the gold standard. In recent years, several minimal invasive treatment options have been introduced with different rates of success, but they have not yet surpassed the results of the artificial sphincter.

A randomized clinical trial of suspension technique for improving early recovery of urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate, in a prospective, single-blind, randomized trial, the safety and efficacy of a suspension technique for improving early recovery of continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We randomly assigned 60 men with clinically localized prostate cancer to RRP; 30 were treated with the suspension technique and the remaining 30 were not. All patients had RRP by the same surgeon followed by early catheter removal on the third day after RRP. The primary outcome measures were the interval to recovery of continence, and the positive margin rates. The continence status was evaluated by a third party using validated questionnaires at baseline before RRP and at 4 and 7 days, and 2 weeks, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after RRP.

RESULTS

The suspension technique resulted in significantly greater continence rates at 1, 3 and 6 months after RRP of 53% vs 20%, 73% vs 47% and 100% vs 83%. Kaplan-Meier curves also showed that patients in the suspension group had a significantly earlier recovery of continence than in the no-suspension group; the median (95% confidence interval) interval for recovery was 31 (12-74) days in the suspension group and 90 (65-150) days in the no-suspension group (log rank test, P = 0.002). The groups had no significant differences in their histological status.

CONCLUSIONS

The suspension technique had a significant effect on the earlier recovery of urinary continence within 6 months after RRP, without compromising the oncological outcome of RRP.

Bladder neck contractures related to the use of Hem-o-lok clips in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVE

Recently, several large series of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) have described a low incidence of bladder neck contractures (BNC). We have had a similar experience at our institution. Our objective is to describe our experience with BNC after RALP and a novel relationship to the use of Hem-o-lok Clips (HOLC).

METHODS

We reviewed a database of patients who underwent RALP at our institution from January 2004 to September 2007 and identified patients with BNC or complications related to the use of HOLC. We performed a retrospective chart review to attempt to determine the cause of each BNC. We also performed a PubMed search and review of the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database.

RESULTS

Of 524 patients undergoing RALP, 4 had a BNC develop, 2 of the BNCs were associated with HOLC migration and erosion into the vesicourethral anastomosis, and 1 was found to have HOLC migration within the bladder. A fifth patient had an anastomotic leak develop secondary to a HOLC that migrated into the bladder neck. Two similar cases of HOLC-related migration have been reported to MAUDE.

CONCLUSIONS

When early BNC or unexplained urinary retention occurs after RALP, one should have a high index of suspicion for migration of HOLC. Clip use should be minimized on tissue immediately adjacent to the anastomosis, and every effort should be made to retrieve loose clips after the procedure.

Contribution of early intensive prolonged pelvic floor exercises on urinary continence recovery after bladder neck-sparing radical prostatectomy: results of a prospective controlled randomized trial

AIMS

In this prospective controlled randomized trial we assessed the effects of early, intensive, prolonged pelvic floor exercises (PFE) on urinary incontinence following bladder neck (BN) sparing RRP.

METHODS

A sample of 152 patients with localized prostate cancer underwent RRP with BN preservation. Out of this group we randomized 107 incontinent patients into 2 groups. We considered incontinent patients with 24 hr Pad test >2 g. The T group received instructions regarding an intensive program of PFE, from 7 days after catheter removal for as long as any degree of incontinence persisted, within a period of 1 year. The control (C) group did not receive instructions. The outcome was assessed using the 24 hr Pad test, a visual analogue scale (VAS) and a single question of QoL. Results at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were available for 54 and 40 patients, respectively.

RESULTS

The overall spontaneous continence rate after catheter removal was 23.6%. The proportion of men still incontinent was significantly higher in the C group than treatment (T) group at 1 (97.5% vs. 83.3%; P = 0.04), 3 (77.5% vs. 53.7%; P = 0.03), 6 (60% vs. 33.3%; P = 0.01), and 12 months (52.5% vs. 16.6%; P < 0.01). Similarly, the VAS and the response to the QoL question at 12 months significantly differed between the two groups (P = 0.01 and 0.03, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that early intensive prolonged PFE can further increase the number of continent patients and this improvement persists in the first 12 months. The second 6 months following surgery are still useful to recovery.

Cold-knife incision of anastomotic strictures after radical retropubic prostatectomy with bladder neck preservation: efficacy and impact on urinary continence status

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the incidence and characteristics of anastomotic strictures (AS) after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) with bladder-neck preservation (BNP), the efficacy of management with cold-knife incision (CKI), and its impact on urinary continence.

METHODS

Seven hundred five consecutive patients who underwent RRP with BNP were prospectively followed with uroflowmetry at postoperative months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and investigated for urinary incontinence with the 1-h pad test at AS diagnosis obtained with urethroscopy. If the instrument could not dilate the stricture, CKI was subsequently performed. Follow-up after treatment was performed with uroflowmetry and 1-h pad test at months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12. Recurrent AS was always treated with repeated CKI.

RESULTS

Six hundred forty-eight patients were assessable. After a median time of 3.8 mo from RRP, 46 (7.1%) patients developed AS. Urinary incontinence was present in 21 (46%) men at AS diagnosis. Three (7%) patients were successfully managed by urethroscopic dilation only, whereas 43 (93%) required CKI. Eleven (26%) of the latter had recurrent AS. After a median follow-up of 48 mo from the last AS treatment, all patients are stricture-free, de novo urinary incontinence was never documented, and of the 21 originally incontinent men, 11 became continent, 8 improved and 2 remained unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, BNP does not decrease the incidence of AS after RRP; however, AS can be effectively managed with repeated CKI with a final 100% success rate. CKI has a possible positive impact on urinary continence in 90% of patients, without causing de novo incontinence.

[Etiology and pathophysiology of male stress incontinence]

Stress urinary incontinence is rare in men. Despite the improvements in diagnostic approaches to prostate diseases and surgical interventions on the prostate, stress incontinence has tended to increase in recent decades. The most frightening operative complication for both the patient and the surgeon is incontinence, which is one of the important factors in the treatment of the affected patients. The limited degree of continence considerably lowers the quality of life for the affected men and their partners. There is little information available about the pathophysiology of iatrogenic stress incontinence, which more likely affects older men rather than young men. The available information is based on a few experimental studies. Besides the direct damage to the muscular or neurological component of the external sphincter, insufficient length of the functional urethra and impaired bladder function seem to play an important role in the genesis of postoperative incontinence. In order to improve the postoperative continence status after radical prostatectomy a number of different operative modifications have been introduced. Preservation of the bladder neck, puboprostatic ligaments, and the neurovascular bundle as well as leaving the tips of the seminal vesicles seem to have a positive impact on the degree of postoperative continence.

Marges après prostatectomie totale : aspects techniques et valeur pronostique

The status of surgical margins after radical prostatectomy is a major prognostic factor. The role of several technical aspects of radical prostatectomy, such have surgical access, bladder neck preservation or neurovascular bundle sparing, in generating supplementary positive margins has been controversial for many years. Positive margins along with other poor prognostic factors are important elements in the decision to perform adjuvant therapy after radical prostatectomy. This review of the literature, based on a Medline search, was designed to update these various issues encountered by urologists in their everyday practice.

Minimising Postoperative Incontinence Following Radical Prostatectomy: Considerations and Evidence

OBJECTIVES

To review evidence regarding perioperative predictors of incontinence after radical prostatectomy (RP), related anatomic and patient factors, and surgical techniques used to minimise incontinence.

METHODS

A search of the Pubmed, Cancerlit, Cochrane, and ISI Web of Science databases was performed for the key words prostatectomy, incontinence, and continence. Relevant articles were reviewed, summarised, and analysed.

RESULTS

Enhanced understanding of pelvic anatomy applied to surgical approaches has improved continence rates following RP; however, incontinence remains a potential adverse outcome. Evidence suggests that increasing patient body weight and prostate volume are not associated with continence outcomes, but increasing patient age may be predictive. Behavioural therapy may aid in early return to continence although the timing of therapy and benefit of biofeedback assistance are unclear. Various surgical techniques are used to improve continence, but no evidence overwhelmingly supports any specific technique. At best, evidence supports early return to continence with some techniques. No technique significantly increased margin positivity solely at the experimental anatomic site.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite enhanced knowledge of anatomy and improved surgical approach, incontinence persists as a potential adverse outcome of RP. Urologists may not find an evidence-based rationalisation for any particular surgical technique due to the nature of surgical series, variability in the definition of incontinence, and individual surgical skills, preferences, and techniques. Giving careful consideration to the trial design can potentially improve the resulting level of evidence.

Prostatectomie périnéale

There is a lack of prospective randomised trials comparing the efficacy of the different techniques for treating localised prostate cancer. Consequently, selecting one rather than the other appears very difficult. Even radical prostatectomy is controversial regarding its best approach--perineal, retropubic or laparoscopic. The perineal route was the first to be undertaken, and it was dropped out due to the need of performing obturator lymphadenectomy by a separate approach. Widespread use of prostate-specific antigen as a screening method has enabled to diagnose prostate cancer at its early stages, when the potential for lymphatic dissemination is low, which enables to obviate Lymphadenectomy in most patients. This was a promoting circumstance to use the perineal route in radical prostatectomies. In this article we discuss the perineal radical prostatectomy surgical technique, its indications, and its advantages and disadvantages as compared to other approaches.

Radical prostatectomy with preservation of urinary continence: pathology and long-term results

PURPOSE

A continence sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy is described and evaluated. Results are compared with those of patients who underwent a standard anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy previously by the same surgeon.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 275 consecutive patients underwent a continence sparing radical prostatectomy by a single surgeon (DLG) between 1996 and 2003. The technique is described in detail.

RESULTS

Total continence (no pad or device) was found immediately upon catheter removal in 36% of patients, within 14 days in 69% and within 7 weeks in 78%, compared to 1%, 6% and 41% of 80 patients who underwent the standard operation. Median time to total continence was 1 day for the new group versus 63 days for the standard surgery group. Positive margins were found in 6.9% of the new group versus 11% of the first 80 patients. Of the former patients 80% have a prostate specific antigen of less than 0.2 ng/ml at an average followup of 12.5 years. With the new procedure 90% of patients have a prostate specific antigen of less than 0.2 ng/ml with an average followup of 5.2 years. There was no operative mortality or unusual complication. The typical patient was discharged home 1 to 3 days postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Preservation of the continence mechanism at the level of the bladder neck and proximal prostatic urethra results in earlier return of continence without adversely affecting cancer control. It is a relatively simple way to improve surgical results.

Complicaciones de la prostatectomía radical: evolución y manejo conservador de la incontinencia urinaria

OBJECTIVES

Radical retropubic prostatectomy is the major procedure for curing early stage prostate cancer. In this retrospective study we valued the complications of this surgery and its evolution in time, as well as the efectiveness of the urinary incontinence preservative treatment in the recovery of urinary continence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During the period between december of 1998 to january of the 2005 we have treated 168 patients suffering prostatic adenocarcinoma clinically confined to the gland by means of retropubic radical prostatectomy. We removed the vesical catheter the fourteenth day of the postoperative and made a clinical monitoring the first, third and sixth month after the surgery, and thereafter every six months.

RESULTS

Of the 168 patients who underwent clinical surgery, 15% required postoperative blood transfusion in the immediate postoperative. Other complications, with a lower incidence, were the intestinal perforation, surgical wound infection and the haematoma. The most frequent delayed complications we registered were erectile dysfunction, observed in 164 patients (98%), micturition alterations in 32 patients (19%) and intestinal alterations in approximately 11%. Among the micturitional alterations found, the most frequent (64%) was the Urinary Incontinence (UI). However, most of them were of minor importance (34%) and all improved during the first six months after the surgery. We advised patients with minor and moderate UI to perform pelvic floor muscle training, being very useful since they allowed to anticipate the recovery of continence.

CONCLUSIONS

Radical prostatectomy continues to be the most effective treatment for the non spared prostate cancer, in spite of the associated morbidity. The IU is the main factor for the high standard of living these patients. Despite the number of patients with UI being so high, most cases are moderate and minor and may improve with pelvic floor muscle training. Hence, this is a significant tool to tackle this illness, whether in connection with the use of absorbent, the pharmacologic therapy or the use of penile collectors.

Intussusception of bladder neck improves early continence after radical prostatectomy: Results of a prospective trial

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of intussusception of the bladder neck on post-radical prostatectomy incontinence.

METHODS

A total of 272 men with organ-confined prostate cancer who had undergone radical retropubic prostatectomy were studied. Of the 272 men, 139 underwent bladder neck intussusception and 133 did not. Patients completed validated questionnaires IIQ-7 and a symptom inventory. Continence was defined as the use of no or only one pad daily.

RESULTS

Of the 272 men, 100%, 98.5%, and 96% answered the questionnaire and urinary symptom inventory at baseline and 3 and 12 months postoperatively, respectively. According to the protective pad requirement, 100%, 60%, and 86% of patients without intussusception and 100%, 77%, and 83% of the patients with intussusception were continent at baseline and 3 and 12 months postoperatively, respectively. Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed a statistically significant impact of intussusception on postprostatectomy incontinence at 3 months (P = 0.009), although continence at 12 months did not differ significantly (P = 0.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Intussusception of the bladder neck had a significant effect on regaining continence at 3 months, although continence at 12 months was not affected.