Extrarenal retroperitoneal angiomyolipoma: nonoperative management

Retroperitoneal extrarenal angiomyolipoma at the surgical bed 8 years after a renal angiomyolipoma nephrectomy: A case report and review of literature

Retroperitoneal extrarenal angiomyolipoma (RERAML) are rare and close mimickers of retroperitoneal liposarcoma on both imaging and histopathology. However, imaging findings including heterogeneity, hyperdensity on unenhanced computed tomography, intralesional hemorrhage, absence of calcifications, low signal intensity on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, and dilated intratumoral vessels can lead to the diagnosis of RERAML. Diagnosis of RERAML can avoid unnecessary surgery since conservative medical management with continued surveillance has been proven to be effective for RERAML whereas surgical resection is the treatment for liposarcoma. Imaging and laboratory follow-up for at least 5 years has been recommended in patients who underwent surgical resection of angiomyolipoma (AML). We present a case of RERAML in an asymptomatic patient whose AML recurred in the surgical bed 8 years after an ipsilateral nephrectomy for renal AML.

A Review of the Literature on Extrarenal Retroperitoneal Angiomyolipoma

BACKGROUND

Extrarenal retroperitoneal angiomyolipomas are rare.

AIM

To review the literature.

RESULTS

Angiomyolipomas, previously classified as hamartomas, are now classified as benign tumours. Thirty cases of primary retroperitoneal angiomyolipomas have been reported. Diagnosis of the disease upon is based radiological and pathological findings of triphasic features of (a) fat and (b) blood vessels and myoid tissue. Immunohistochemistry tends to be positive for HMB45, MART1, HHF35, calponin, NKI-C3, and CD117. The lesion is common in women. Treatment options have included the following: (a) radical surgical excision of the lesion with renal sparing surgery or radical nephrectomy in cases where malignant tumours could not be excluded and (b) selective embolization of the lesion alone or prior to surgical excision. One case of retroperitoneal angiomyolipoma was reported in a patient 15 years after undergoing radical nephrectomy for angiomyolipoma of kidney and two cases of distant metastases of angiomyolipoma have been reported following radical resection of the tumour.

CONCLUSIONS

With the report of two cases of metastases ensuing surgical resection of the primary lesions there is need for academic pathologists to debate and review angiomyolipomas to decide whether to reclassify angiomyolipomas as slow-growing malignant tumours or whether the reported cases of metastases were de novo tumours or metastatic lesions.

Retroperitoneal angiomyolipoma: a case report and review of the literature

Retroperitoneal angiomyolipoma is a rare tumour that is difficult to diagnose preoperatively. We present a case of retroperitoneal angiomyolipoma that highlights its diagnostic dilemma. We also performed a literature review and present a review of retroperitoneal angiomyolipoma.

Retroperitoneal extrarenal angiomyolipomas: an evidence-based approach to a rare clinical entity

Extrarenal angiomyolipomas (ERAMLs) are rare tumors that present as incidentalomas upon imaging for other conditions. Retroperitoneal ERAMLs present a unique challenge from a diagnostic and treatment standpoint as they can mimic other benign and malignant retroperitoneal tumors. We present a case of a 39-year-old female with a 19.3 cm × 13.5 cm × 10.7 cm left extrarenal retroperitoneal mass. Histopathologic examination and HMB-45 staining revealed the mass to be a retroperitoneal ERAML. Our case report provides a comprehensive literature review and an evidence-based algorithm for taking care of patients with ERAMLs.

Extrarenal retroperitoneal angiomyolipoma: case report and review of the literature

Angiomyolipomas are rare benign tumors that usually occur in the kidneys. Extrarenal angiomyolipomas are extremely uncommon. We describe a case of angiomyolipoma arising in the retroperitoneum that was successfully treated by arterial embolization and surgical excision. The literature on retroperitoneal extrarenal angiomyolipoma and its differential diagnoses is briefly reviewed.

Giant Extrarenal Retroperitoneal Angiomyolipoma: A Case Report and Literature Review

Extrarenal angiomyolipoma is an uncommon disease entity and is rare in the retroperitoneum. We report a case of giant extrarenal retroperitoneal angiomyolipoma mimicking liposarcoma. A 35-year-old woman presented with a history of increased abdominal circumference and urinary frequency. Abdominal computerized tomography demonstrated a 24 x 21 x 16 cm retroperitoneal fatty tumor displacing the right kidney to the left upper quadrant of the abdomen. At laparotomy, the tumor was widely excised and the right kidney was successfully preserved. Final histologic examination identified the tumor as an angiomyolipoma. At 4-month postoperative follow-up, no evidence of tumor recurrence was found and the right kidney was fully functional.

Contemporary diagnosis and management of renal angiomyolipoma

PURPOSE

We present a comprehensive resource that summarizes contemporary advances relevant to the clinical management of renal angiomyolipoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A MEDLINE search was done using the key words angiomyolipoma, hemangioma or lipoma and kidney neoplasm, and therapeutic embolization. References from these articles were reviewed to identify additional relevant source material. We identified 13 series published since 1986 comprising 336 patients as well as 24 reports of therapeutic embolization for angiomyolipoma, comprising 76 patients. To our knowledge we report the largest compilation series to date.

RESULTS

Angiomyolipoma is generally benign, although an uncommon subtype (epithelioid angiomyolipoma) may behave more aggressively. Tuberous sclerosis associated angiomyolipoma tends to be larger, multiple and more likely to cause spontaneous hemorrhage than the sporadic entity. Tumors that hemorrhage tend to be larger. Computerized tomography or magnetic resonance is usually sufficient for diagnosis. Biopsy is rarely useful. Primary indications for intervention include symptoms such as pain or bleeding or suspicion of malignancy. Prophylactic intervention is justifiable for large tumors, in females of childbearing age or in patients in whom followup or access to emergency care may be inadequate. Recent advances that have affected management include improved understanding of tuberous sclerosis complex and angiomyolipoma genetics, the identification of molecular markers that facilitate histopathological diagnosis, and the refinement of embolization and partial nephrectomy techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Although some cases of angiomyolipoma may require complete nephrectomy, most can be managed by conservative nephron sparing approaches. Ongoing research into the molecular biology and clinical behavior of angiomyolipoma may improve our ability to manage these lesions.

Giant bleeding renal angiomyolipoma: diagnosis and management

A case of a giant bleeding renal angiomyolipoma is presented. The patient was a 40-year-old Egyptian male with no clinical or radiological evidence of tuberous sclerosis. The radiological features and management, including the role of angiography are briefly discussed and the medical reviews on this subject are briefly considered.

Computerized tomography characteristics that differentiate angiomyolipomas from liposarcomas in the perinephric space

PURPOSE

We performed a retrospective study to determine computerized tomography (CT) findings associated with perinephric angiomyolipomas or perinephric liposarcomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During the last 7 years 6 patients with perinephric angiomyolipoma and 12 with perinephric liposarcoma were seen at our hospital. Two radiologists who were blinded to the pathological diagnosis retrospectively evaluated the CT characteristics of perinephric angiomyolipoma and perinephric liposarcoma. The relationship of each CT characteristic with tumor type was compared using Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

The CT characteristics of perinephric angiomyolipoma were intratumoral linear vascularity (p = 0.001), aneurysmal dilatation (p = 0.025), bridging vessel sign (p = 0.005), hematoma (p = 0.025), beak sign (p = 0.001) and discrete intrarenal fatty tumors (p = 0.025). The CT characteristic of perinephric liposarcoma was a nonfatty soft tissue mass (p = 0.005). There was no significant difference in the presence of calcifications in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study suggests that analysis of CT characteristics (linear vascularity, aneurysmal dilatation, bridging vessel sign, hematoma, beak sign and discrete intrarenal fatty tumors) may help to differentiate perinephric angiomyolipoma from perinephric liposarcoma.