DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION AND IMAGING STUDIES ARE UNNECESSARY IN MEN WITH UNDETECTABLE PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN FOLLOWING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY

Urinary fatty acid biomarkers for prostate cancer detection

The lack of accuracy in the current prostate specific antigen (PSA) test for prostate cancer (PCa) screening causes around 60-75% of unnecessary prostate biopsies. Therefore, alternative diagnostic methods that have better accuracy and can prevent over-diagnosis of PCa are needed. Researchers have examined various potential biomarkers for PCa, and of those fatty acids (FAs) markers have received special attention due to their role in cancer metabolomics. It has been noted that PCa metabolism prefers FAs over glucose substrates for continued rapid proliferation. Hence, we proposed using a urinary FAs based model as a non-invasive alternative for PCa detection. Urine samples collected from 334 biopsy-designated PCa positive and 232 biopsy-designated PCa negative subjects were analyzed for FAs and lipid related compounds by stir bar sorptive extraction coupled with gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (SBSE-GC/MS). The dataset was split into the training (70%) and testing (30%) sets to develop and validate logit models and repeated for 100 runs of random data partitioning. Over the 100 runs, we confirmed the stability of the models and obtained optimal tuning parameters for developing the final FA based model. A PSA model using the values of the patients' PSA test results was constructed with the same cohort for the purpose of comparing the performances of the FA model against PSA test. The FA final model selected 20 FAs and rendered an AUC of 0.71 (95% CI = 0.67-0.75, sensitivity = 0.48, and specificity = 0.83). In comparison, the PSA model performed with an AUC of 0.51 (95% CI = 0.46-0.66, sensitivity = 0.44, and specificity = 0.71). The study supports the potential use of urinary FAs as a stable and non-invasive alternative test for PCa diagnosis.

[Verumontanum mucosal hyperplasia as a differential diagnosis of a local recurrence following radical prostatectomy]

Verumontanum mucosal gland hyperplasia (VMGH) is a benign microacinar proliferative lesion, which occurs exclusively in the verumontanum and the posterior urethra and is one of the lesions that may be confused with a low-risk adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland.We present the case of a 72-year-old male patient who underwent radical prostatectomy due to an adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland (pT2c pN0 cM0 R0, Gleason Score: 3 + 3 = 6). Five years after the operation, we sonographically detected a 3x2 cm large tumour in the prostate bed. While our first assumption was a PSA-negative local recurrence following radical prostatectomy, a comprehensive histological examination along with the clinical evaluation led us to the diagnosis of a VMGH. VMGH is a less well-known differential diagnosis of PSA-negative local recurrence following radical prostatectomy, whose clinical manifestation should be presented.

High sulfite oxidase expression could predict postoperative biochemical recurrence in patients with prostate cancer

Sulfite oxidase (SUOX) is a metalloenzyme that plays a role in ATP synthesis via oxidative phosphorylation in mitochondria and has been reported to also be involved in the invasion and differentiation capacities of tumor cells. Here, we performed a clinicopathological investigation of SUOX expression in prostate cancer and discussed the usefulness of SUOX expression as a predictor of biochemical recurrence following surgical treatment in prostate cancer. This study was conducted using Tissue Micro Array specimens obtained from 97 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy at our hospital between 2007 and 2011. SUOX staining was used to evaluate cytoplasmic SUOX expression. In the high-expression group, the early biochemical recurrence was significantly more frequent than in the low-expression group (p = 0.0008). In multivariate analysis, high SUOX expression was found to serve as an independent prognostic factor of biochemical recurrence (hazard ratio = 2.33, 95% confidence interval = 1.32-4.15, p = 0.0037). In addition, Ki-67-labeling indices were significantly higher in the high-expression group than in the low-expression group (p = 0.0058). Therefore, SUOX expression may be a powerful prognostic biomarker for decision-making in postoperative follow-up after total prostatectomy and with regard to the need for relief treatment.

Solitary recurrence of castration-resistant prostate cancer with low or undetectable levels of prostate specific antigen salvaged with local ablative radiation therapy: A case report

Prostate cancer recurrences are usually first detected by increased levels of prostate specific antigen (PSA), and systemic therapy is often initiated if distant metastasis is confirmed. However, low or nearly undetectable levels of PSA in the modern era of ultrasensitive PSA assay may be difficult to interpret in patients with a history of prostate cancer. Deciding whether to initiate additional systemic therapy in limited indolent metastatic disease while balancing the quality of life of the patient and ensuring the oncologic control of the disease may be challenging. In the present study, the case of a biopsy-confirmed solitary spine recurrence of prostate cancer with nearly undetectable but persistent levels of PSA (0.05 ng/ml) is reported. Treatment of the recurrence with local ablative radiotherapy improved the pain experienced by the patient, and reduced his levels of PSA to undetectable limits (<0.05 ng/ml). Repeated imaging analysis, PSA assay and clinical assessment demonstrated durable control of the disease without the requirement for additional systemic treatments. The present case highlighted the importance of initiating appropriate work-up according to the clinical scenario. Local treatment for solitary or oligometastatic recurrence of prostate cancer may enhance the effectiveness of current therapeutic strategies and benefit certain patients.

A randomized phase II study of pomegranate extract for men with rising PSA following initial therapy for localized prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Pomegranate juice has been associated with PSA doubling time (PSADT) elongation in a single-arm phase II trial. This study assesses biological activity of two doses of pomegranate extract (POMx) in men with recurrent prostate cancer, using changes in PSADT as the primary outcome.

METHODS

This randomized, multi-center, double-blind phase II, dose-exploring trial randomized men with a rising PSA and without metastases to receive 1 or 3 g of POMx, stratified by baseline PSADT and Gleason score. Patients (104) were enrolled and treated for up to 18 months. The intent-to-treat (ITT) population was 96% white, with median age 74.5 years and median Gleason score 7. This study was designed to detect a 6-month on-study increase in PSADT from baseline in each arm.

RESULTS

Overall, median PSADT in the ITT population lengthened from 11.9 months at baseline to 18.5 months after treatment (P < 0.001). PSADT lengthened in the low-dose group from 11.9 to 18.8 months and 12.2 to 17.5 months in the high-dose group, with no significant difference between dose groups (P = 0.554). PSADT increases >100% of baseline were observed in 43% of patients. Declining PSA levels were observed in 13 patients (13%). In all, 42% of patients discontinued treatment before meeting the protocol-definition of PSA progression, or 18 months, primarily due to a rising PSA. No significant changes occurred in testosterone. Although no clinically significant toxicities were seen, diarrhea was seen in 1.9% and 13.5% of patients in the 1- and 3-g dose groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

POMx treatment was associated with ≥ 6 month increases in PSADT in both treatment arms without adverse effects. The significance of this on-study slowing of PSADT remains unclear, reinforcing the need for placebo-controlled studies in this patient population.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® posttreatment follow-up of prostate cancer

Although prostate cancer can be effectively treated, recurrent or residual disease after therapy is not uncommon and is usually detected by a rise in prostate-specific antigen. Patients with biochemical prostate-specific antigen relapse should undergo a prompt search for the presence of local recurrence or distant metastatic disease, each requiring different forms of therapy. Various imaging modalities and image-guided procedures may be used in the evaluation of these patients. Literature on the indications and usefulness of these radiologic studies and procedures in specific clinical settings is reviewed. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria(®) are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

Role of imaging and biopsy to assess local recurrence after definitive treatment for prostate carcinoma (surgery, radiotherapy, cryotherapy, HIFU)

PURPOSE

Defining the site of recurrent disease early after definitive treatment for a localized prostate cancer is a critical issue as it may greatly influence the subsequent therapeutic strategy or patient management.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed by searching Medline from January 1995 up to January 2011. Electronic searches were limited to the English language, and the keywords prostate cancer, radiotherapy [RT], high intensity focused ultrasound [HIFU], cryotherapy [CRIO], transrectal ultrasound [TRUS], magnetic resonance [MRI], PET/TC, and prostate biopsy were used.

RESULTS

Despite the fact that diagnosis of a local recurrence is based on PSA values and kinetics, imaging by means of different techniques may be a prerequisite for effective disease management. Unfortunately, prostate cancer local recurrences are very difficult to detect by TRUS and conventional imaging that have shown limited accuracy at least at early stages. On the contrary, functional and molecular imaging such as dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), offers the possibility of imaging molecular or cellular processes of individual tumors. Recently, PET/CT, using 11C-choline, 18F-fluorocholine or 11C-acetate has been successfully proposed in detecting local recurrences as well as distant metastases. Nevertheless, in controversial cases, it is necessary to perform a biopsy of the prostatic fossa or a biopsy of the prostate to assess the presence of a local recurrence under guidance of MRI or TRUS findings.

CONCLUSION

It is likely that imaging will be extensively used in the future to detect and localize prostate cancer local recurrences before salvage treatment.

Magnetic resonance imaging in postprostatectomy radiotherapy planning

PURPOSE

To investigate whether the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in prostate bed treatment planning could influence definition of the clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 21 consecutive patients referred for prostate bed radiotherapy were included in the present retrospective study. The CTV was delineated according to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer recommendations on computed tomography (CT) and T(1)-weighted (T(1)w) and T(2)-weighted (T(2)w) MRI. The CTV magnitude, agreement, and spatial differences were evaluated on the planning CT scan after registration with the MRI scans.

RESULTS

The CTV was significantly reduced on the T(1)w and T(2)w MRI scans (13% and 9%, respectively) compared with the CT scans. The urinary bladder was drawn smaller on the CT scans and the rectum was smaller on the MRI scans. On T(1)w MRI, the rectum and urinary bladder were delineated larger than on T(2)w MRI. Minimal agreement was observed between the CT and T(2)w images. The main spatial differences were measured in the superior and superolateral directions in which the CTV on the MRI scans was 1.8-2.9 mm smaller. In the posterior and inferior border, no difference was seen between the CT and T(1)w MRI scans. On the T(2)w MRI scans, the CTV was larger in these directions (by 1.3 and 1.7 mm, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of MRI in postprostatectomy radiotherapy planning resulted in a reduction of the CTV. The main differences were found in the superior part of the prostate bed. We believe T(2)w MRI enables more precise definition of prostate bed CTV than conventional planning CT.

Is Routine Digital Rectal Examination Required for the Followup of Prostate Cancer?

PURPOSE

With more men being diagnosed and radically treated for prostate cancer there is an increasing number of patients requiring followup. A proportion of radically treated patients have recurrence and require early salvage treatment. Traditionally followup involved physical examination, urinalysis, imaging and biopsy. Since the development of the prostate specific antigen assay, followup has largely consisted of digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen determination. Although digital rectal examination is routinely used, its efficacy for detecting recurrent cancer in the absence of biochemical evidence of disease progression was questioned in recent studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a literature search using the key words digital rectal examination, per rectal examination, radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy, and cross-referenced all results.

RESULTS

The literature that supports digital rectal examination as part of patient followup after radical prostatectomy is based on case studies and it is less applicable with more sensitive prostate specific antigen assays. In almost 5,000 patients after prostatectomy a prostate specific antigen increase reliably preceded disease recurrence, making digital rectal examination superfluous to requirements. No published literature supports repeat digital rectal examination after radical radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Prostate specific antigen allows the early detection of disease recurrence. Although digital rectal examination is widely used to follow patients, contemporary studies consistently show that disease progression does not occur in the absence of increasing prostate specific antigen. This suggests that remote followup of patients with prostate specific antigen alone is a safe practice, although caution should be exercised in those with higher grade tumors, which may not produce significant amounts of prostate specific antigen.

Prostate cancer progression in the presence of undetectable or low serum prostate-specific antigen level

BACKGROUND

The serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level after definitive treatment for prostate cancer (PC) is a powerful predictor of outcome. Occasionally, PC progression can occur despite low or undetectable PSA levels. The authors report on the clinical and pathologic characteristics of patients who experienced PC progression with undetectable or low PSA levels.

METHODS

From an electronic database of all patients with PC who were treated at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center between 1999 and 2004, a group of 46 patients was identified who had progression to metastatic PC detected with concomitant PSA levels from 0.1 ng/mL to 2 ng/mL. Patient charts were reviewed for tumor stage, Gleason score, pretreatment PSA level, and the presence of atypical histologic variants (ie, ductal, sarcomatoid, or small cell cancers). The nadir PSA level after treatment and the PSA level at the time metastatic PC was detected were determined. The patients were followed semiannually, and imaging studies were obtained at the discretion of treating physicians. The sites of metastasis and histologic confirmation were reported when available.

RESULTS

Twenty-three of 46 patients underwent radical prostatectomy, 11 patients received radiation therapy, and 12 received hormone treatment as their initial form of therapy. Progression to metastatic disease with concomitant, undetectable PSA levels occurred in 10 patients, including 3 patients who had not received treatment with hormones. The sites of metastasis included bone (n = 35 patients), liver (n = 7 patients), retroperitoneal lymph nodes (n = 5 patients), lungs (n = 4 patients), and brain (n = 1 patient). Aggressive and locally advanced PC were common features in these patients: Eighty-five percent had Gleason scores >or=7, 63% had clinical T3 or T4 tumors, and 41% had pretreatment PSA levels >10 ng/mL. Atypical histologic variants were observed in 21 patients (46%) and in 8 of 10 patients who progressed with undetectable PSA levels. In 10 patients (22%), metastasis were detected in the presence of an undetectable PSA level. Eight of those patients had small cell carcinoma. In 19 patients (41%), progression to metastasis occurred without any increase in their PSA from the nadir level. Thirty-one patients (67%) were asymptomatic at the time metastasis was detected, and the detection of metastasis in these patients occurred only because of routine imaging studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Progression of PC may occur despite undetectable or low PSA levels. Complete physical evaluation and imaging studies may be indicated in the surveillance of patients with high-grade, locally advanced tumors, especially when atypical histologic variants are present.

The Actual Value of the Surgical Margin Status as a Predictor of Disease Progression in Men with Early Prostate Cancer

OBJECTIVES

The surgical margin status after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer has long been considered a powerful prognostic factor, as well as an important risk factor for local recurrent disease after radical prostatectomy. In this study, a critical analysis of the predictive value of the surgical margin status was performed.

METHODS

A well-described cohort of 281 participants of a population-based randomized screening trial who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1994 and 2000 was analyzed. Besides pathologic tumor stage, Gleason score, percentage of high-grade cancer, and tumor volume, the prognostic value of the surgical margin status for disease outcome (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] relapse, local recurrence) was statistically evaluated. Specifically, site ('apical' or 'circumferential') and extent of surgical margin negativity ('negative', or 'close') or positivity ('focal' or 'extensive') was assessed.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 7 yr (range, 5-120 mo), 39 (13.9%) and 7 (2.5%) men had biochemical failure (PSA >/=0.1ng/ml), and local relapse, respectively. The surgical margin status was positive in 66 (23.5%), with 26 (9.3%) at the prostatic apex. The margin status was an independent statistically significant risk factor for biochemical relapse, though not for local relapse. Of those with positive margins, 22 (33.3%) had PSA relapse and 4 (6.1%) had local recurrence, whereas these figures were 17 (7.9%) and 3 (1.4%) for those with a negative surgical margin, respectively. The extent of margin positivity was not predictive of PSA relapse nor was the site of the surgical margin.

CONCLUSIONS

In surgically treated prostate cancer, the surgical margin status has, although being a statistically significant prognostic factor, only limited predictive value for PSA relapse and local recurrent disease. The majority of men with (extensive) positive surgical margins will not experience PSA relapse nor local disease progression, even in absence of adjuvant radiotherapy. So, cases with a positive margin of resection may still be cured, although the procedure in itself was not 'radical'.

Prognostic factors in lymph node-positive prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

To characterize lymph node metastasis of prostate cancer (PCa) and identify the parameters associated with patient outcome. The incidence of clinically localized PCa with concurrent lymph node metastasis has decreased to less than 1% in the United States but is between 10% and 15% in other countries.

METHODS

Our study cohort of 1148 patients underwent radical prostatectomy in Ulm, Germany, between 1986 and 2002, and 201 (18%) had lymph node-positive PCa.

RESULTS

The metastases showed growth architecture resembling primary PCa. We assigned a Gleason pattern and evaluated for size, extranodal extension, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI). Of 201 patients, 155 had original pathology slides available; 36 of the 155 were excluded because of preoperative hormonal ablation therapy. Of the remaining 119 patients, 22 (19%) were assigned Gleason pattern 3, 93 (78%) Gleason pattern 4, and 4 (3%) Gleason pattern 5. Extranodal extension was present in 66 (55%) of 119 patients and LVI in 29 (25%). An increased risk of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence was found for Gleason pattern 4/5 (hazard ratio [HR] 2.5, P = 0.038), LVI in the lymph nodes (HR 1.9, P = 0.038), and nuclear grade of the primary tumor (HR 2, P = 0.025). Independent predictors of PSA recurrence included LVI and nuclear grade (HR 1.9, P = 0.03 and HR 2, P = 0.03, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Lymph node metastases of PCa are heterogeneous and have a close relation to the corresponding primary tumor. Most patients with lymph node-positive PCa remained disease free for up to 13 years after radical prostatectomy. Independent predictors of PSA recurrence among those with lymph node-positive PCa included LVI in the lymph nodes and the nuclear grade of the primary tumor. These parameters may be useful in predicting PSA recurrence in lymph node-positive PCa and could be included in patient follow-up.

Very late local recurrence after surgery for prostate cancer unaccompanied by detectable PSA levels

The possibility and possible aetiology of local prostate cancer (PC) recurrence despite undetectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels are highlighted. A case of a local recurrence 8.5 years after radical prostatectomy for Gleason 3+4 PC is presented. It demonstrates that PC can recur, even after a prolonged period of time (8.5 years), despite undetectable levels (i.e. <0.02 ng/ml) of PSA. In conclusion, the decision to omit digital rectal examination from the follow-up regimens of men with undetectable PSA levels could be justified. In such exceptional cases, however, PC recurrence would be either missed or would only be diagnosed after a considerable delay.

Digital Rectal Examination is no Longer Necessary in the Routine Follow-up of Men with Undetectable Prostate Specific Antigen after Radical Prostatectomy: The Implications for Follow-up

OBJECTIVES

We determined the role of Digital Rectal Examination (DRE) in the follow-up of those patients treated with radical prostatectomy for clinically localised prostate cancer having an undetectable PSA. We discuss the implications of our findings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An analysis was performed of a prospectively organised data base of 1118 patients treated at our institution by radical prostatectomy after the introduction of PSA in 1987. A strict definition of PSA progression was used, that is any elevation above undetectable PSA or lowest recorded post-operative PSA (nadir), in order not to miss a single patient who may have recurrent local disease or distant metastases without PSA progression. We counted local recurrent disease as those patients having histologically proven adenocarcinoma on TRUS directed biopsies, and distant disease as those patients having detectable metastatic disease on radionuclide bone scan.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 4.0 years (3 months to 15 years). 524 men (46.9%) had a follow-up of more than 5 years and 88 men (7.9%) of more than 10 years. A total of 397 men (35.5%) had biochemical progression according to our strict definition. 53 patients (4.7%) developed a histological local recurrence and 57 men (5.1%) developed bony metastases; none of these men had an undetectable PSA or a stable PSA at nadir level at the time of detection. They all demonstrated a rising PSA.

CONCLUSIONS

DRE is no longer necessary in the routine follow-up of patients with an undetectable PSA after radical prostatectomy. Following a period of approximately 2 years of out-patient clinic follow-up post-operatively in which issues such as incontinence and erectile dysfunction are addressed and treated, it is possible to restrict follow-up to PSA determinations alone and as long as the PSA remains undetectable counselling can be carried out by a nurse practitioner.

[PSA recurrence after primary curative therapy--local or systemic? When is a second curative therapy still possible?]

PSA recurrence after primary curative therapy for localized prostate cancer is a common problem. Further curative treatment is only reasonable in the case of local recurrence. Therefore, minimizing the likelihood of metastatic disease is crucial. So far, imaging techniques cannot distinguish between local recurrence and distant metastasis. It is therefore reasonable to orientate on PSA kinetics and pathological criteria. Histologic confirmation of suspected local recurrence after radical prostatectomy before salvage therapy is not required. However, after initial radiation therapy histologic confirmation of suspected isolated local recurrence should be obtained. The optimal treatment for a PSA recurrence depends on the initial therapy and the life-expectancy of the patient.

The utility of digital rectal examination after radical radiotherapy for prostate cancer

AIMS

The aim of the current study was to determine the utility of routine digital rectal examination (DRE) after radical radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1990 and 1999, 899 patients with clinically localised prostatic adenocarcinoma (T1-4, N0/Nx, M0/Mx) underwent neoadjuvant androgen deprivation and radical radiotherapy at the Royal Marsden Hospital. Patients were followed with serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test and DRE carried out at 6-monthly intervals for the first 2 years, and then annually.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 5 years, 39 out of 899 cases (4.3%) had local recurrence detected on DRE. DRE failed to detect any local recurrences in the absence of a rising PSA. The lowest serum PSA concentration at the time of clinically detectable local recurrence was 1.7 ng/ml.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings question the standard model of follow-up after radiotherapy for prostate cancer, and suggest that alternatives, such as telephone clinics, should be considered.

Is DRE essential for the follow up of prostate cancer patients? A prospective audit of 194 patients

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer follow up forms a substantial part of the urology outpatient workload. Nurse led prostate cancer follow up clinics are becoming more common. Routine follow-up may involve performing DRE, which may require training.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this audit was to assess the factors that influenced the change in the management of prostate cancer patients during follow up. This would allow us to pave the way towards a protocol driven follow up clinic led by nurse specialists without formal training in DRE.

RESULTS

194 prostate cancer patients were seen over a period of two months and all the patients had DRE performed on at least one occasion. The management was changed in 47 patients. The most common factor influencing this change was PSA trend. A change in DRE findings influenced advancement of the clinic visit in 2 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

PSA is the most common factor influencing change in the management of these patients. Nurse specialists can run prostate cancer follow-up clinics in parallel to existing consultant clinics and reserve DRE only for those patients who have a PSA change or have onset of new symptoms. However larger studies are required involving all the subgroups of patients to identify the subgroups of patients who will require DRE routinely.

Prostate cancer: radical prostatectomy

Today, more men than ever before are being followed after radical prostatectomy. Prognosis and follow-up should be based on the pathologic specimen. Measurable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after surgery defines failure, with time to detectable PSA and rate of PSA rise being useful prognostic factors. The natural history of untreated biochemical failure is protracted, a fact to be considered in discussions of adjuvant treatment. Early in disease recurrence, imaging studies to locate residual disease rarely are useful clinically. Both adjuvant and salvage radiation to the prostate bed have benefits and risks, but neither is superior in overall prostate cancer survival. The timing of hormone therapy remains largely empiric. The promise of effective cytotoxic chemotherapy still is greater than its actual benefits, although novel cytostatic agents are being developed. The future management of this disease will improve with better molecular definition of risk and therapeutic response.

PSA progression following radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy: new standards in the new Millennium

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression following radical treatments of clinically localized prostate cancer is a common problem facing both the patient and the urologist. Not all patients with relapsing disease have an equal risk of death due to prostate cancer. After surgery, biochemical failure can be defined as persisting detectable levels of PSA after radical prostatectomy or a PSA rise after a period of normalization. On the other hand, definitions of PSA progression after radiation therapy vary and no clear consensus can be found. This review of the recent international literature updates the knowledge about the diagnostic procedures used in relapsing patients. Predictors of progression are precised leading to a better patient selection, based on currently available tables and nomograms. Indeed, identification of high risk patients may allow a more appropriate treatment decision. After radical treatment, the analysis of time to recurrence, PSA doubling time, PSA kinetics combined to modern imaging techniques such as 111In capromab penditide scan may allow a better identification of the recurrence site. Thus, an optimal treatment strategy may be envisaged such as local irradiation, salvage surgery, hormone therapy or combinations for which indications and results are provided. Alternative options such as cryotherapy still need further investigation. At last, the use of artificial neural networks will certainly enhance the selection of patients submitted to radical treatments as well as the selection of relapsing patients to allow a more appropriate adjuvant therapy.

Patterns of failure after primary local therapy for prostate cancer and rationale for secondary therapy

The timing and type of treatment for patients with biochemical disease recurrence after local therapy for prostate cancer remains controversial. This is because of many unresolved issues surrounding the natural history of disease progression in such patients, including the limited ability of clinical measures to accurately define local versus distant disease recurrence. Clinicians generally rely on clinical tumor characteristics, such as tumor stage, grade, and prostate specific antigen (PSA) kinetics after local therapy, to distinguish local from distant recurrence. This determination is important, because patients with local recurrence may be candidates for a second, potentially curative treatment, whereas those with distant recurrence are generally treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Data from a national disease registry of patients with prostate cancer, the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor (CaPSURE), suggest that the use of secondary cancer treatment after local therapy for prostate cancer is common. For patients initially treated with radical prostatectomy, secondary treatment appears to be nearly equally divided between postoperative radiation and ADT, whereas >90% of patients receiving a secondary treatment after radiation are treated with ADT. Serum PSA at diagnosis, Gleason score, and type of initial treatment appear to be predictors of secondary treatment use in this setting. Patient age, lymph node status, and margin status appear to be predictors of secondary treatment with ADT or radiation for patients initially treated with radical prostatectomy.

Medically and economically appropriate follow-up schedule for prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND

Our goal was to determine the optimal frequency and method of follow-up after radical prostatectomy to minimize medical cost without adversely affecting patients.

METHODS

Two hundred and twenty-one patients who underwent a radical prostatectomy with or without adjuvant androgen deprivation from 1989 to 1999 were selected for the study. Eighty percent of the patients received postoperative androgen deprivation. Tumor recurrence was strictly defined as detectable serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) and/or clinical findings such as local tumor detection or bone metastasis. Thirty of 221 patients experienced tumor recurrence. Risk of tumor recurrence, procedures for detection of recurrence, and PSA doubling time after biochemical failure were analyzed.

RESULTS

None of the 30 patients who were examined showed definitive local recurrence or metastatic sites on the imaging study at the time of initial PSA detection, and there were no observed recurrences in the absence of detectable serum PSA. In patients who showed elevated PSA within 12 months after radical prostatectomy, PSA levels rapidly increased with doubling times ranging from 1.2 to 13.7 months. Excluding those patients, the doubling time of PSA levels ranged from 2.8 to 31.5 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Prostate specific antigen screening is sufficient to detect treatment failure after radical prostatectomy, irrespective of adjuvant hormone therapy. Based on the calculated doubling time, the longest advisable interval between checks of PSA levels is estimated to be four months within the first year after radical prostatectomy, and biannually or annually thereafter. Continuously elevated PSA levels or clinical symptoms indicate surveys for local recurrences and distant metastases.

The role of imaging studies and molecular markers for selecting candidates for radical prostatectomy

For the typical patient who has newly diagnosed prostate cancer, clinically organ-confined disease of moderate grade, and a PSA less than 10 ng/mL, the current role of imaging studies and molecular biomarkers is limited. Bone scans are not necessary for newly diagnosed men with a PSA less than 10 ng/mL in the absence of bone pain. Similarly, abdominal and pelvic CT scanning rarely provides any useful diagnostic or staging information when the PSA is less the 20 ng/mL and is indicated rarely. Endorectal coil MR imaging adds staging information for patients with a PSA between 10 and 20 ng/mL, a Gleason score of 7 or less, and 50% or more positive biopsies on a sextant sampling. Indium 111 capromab pendetide scanning (ProstaScint) is FDA-approved to evaluate newly diagnosed patients at high risk for metastases. These patients have a Gleason score of 7 or greater and a PSA greater than 20 ng/mL, a Gleason score of 8 to 10 regardless of the PSA value, or clinical stage T3 disease and a Gleason score of 6 or greater. RT-PCR testing of blood or bone marrow for prostate-specific or prostate cancer-specific gene expression, or "molecular staging," is a promising technique whose current use is still investigational. Much useful information may be gained by careful study of prostate needle biopsy material. Aside from current Gleason grading and the number or percentage of cores involved with cancer, no molecular biomarker is approved for clinical use. p27, p53, bcl-2, Ki-67 (MIB-1), and the assessment of neovascularity hold promise, but prospective multicenter studies are needed. In the long-term, multiple gene expression profiling of biopsy material using gene chips may revolutionize the care of patients with prostate cancer and those who elect radical prostatectomy.

What does prostate-specific antigen recurrence mean?

The return of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) to a detectable serum level (PSA recurrence) is usually the first sign of recurrent disease after radical prostatectomy. PSA recurrence generally occurs in men who are otherwise asymptomatic and may occur as late as 5 to 10 years after surgery. Men in this situation want to know what this means regarding the likelihood of clinical disease recurrence and, ultimately, survival. An evaluation for recurrent disease is warranted but generally does not reveal objective signs of clinical disease in the majority of men. Although select men may benefit from salvage local therapy, a PSA recurrence is most often an early sign of distant disease present since the time of surgery. The decision whether or not to initiate systemic therapy in these men is difficult and controversial. Fortunately, recent developments in determining the significance of a PSA recurrence may help the patient and his physician to make a more informed decision regarding treatment options.