SELECTIVE DETECTION OF INACTIVATING MUTATIONS OF THE TUMOR SUPPRESSOR GENE p53 IN BLADDER TUMORS

[Preliminary study of p53 and FGFR3 gene mutations in the urine for bladder tumors]

INTRODUCTION

Two major pathways are described in bladder carcinogenesis: one for invasive or high grade tumors characterized by alteration of the p53 tumor suppressor gene and the other for non-invasive tumors or low grade involving mutations FGFR3. The objective of our study was to validate the research in the urine of mutations in these two genes in patients with a bladder tumor.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In our preliminary study, we investigated 36 patients the FGFR3 and p53 mutations in tumors and urine collected during endoscopic resection. The p53 mutations were sought in FASAY, which allows a functional analysis of the protein P53. The FGFR3 mutations were sought in SNaPshot that searches the eight most frequent mutation points of this gene.

RESULTS

For 24 patients (66% of cases), we found at least one of the two mutations in the tumor. This mutation was present in the urine in 15 patients (sensitivity=62.5%). In only one patient, we found a mutation in the urinary sediment that did not exist in the tumor (specificity=91.7%).

CONCLUSION

The search for mutations of p53 and FGFR3 in the urine was a simple and non-invasive assay, which seems superior to urinary cytology for the detection of bladder tumors, raising hopes of an interest in this bio-assay for surveillance of bladder tumors and screening risk populations.

Molecular profiling of bladder tumors based on the detection of FGFR3 and TP53 mutations

PURPOSE

On a routine basis we performed systematic molecular screening for FGFR3 and TP53 mutations in 121 bladder tumors. We then specifically analyzed the predictive value of the recurrence of FGFR3 and TP53 genotypes in superficial lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The FGFR3 gene was analyzed by direct sequencing of exons 7, 10 and 15, whereas TP53 status was determined using the p53 functional assay in yeast.

RESULTS

We identified a missense FGFR3 mutation in 66% of pTa, 26% of pT1 and 12% of pT2 tumors. Of activating FGFR3 mutations 54% and 85% were found in low G1 and intermediate G2 grade tumors, respectively, but in only 20% of high grade G3 tumors. We detected inactivating TP53 mutations in 10% of pTa, 42% of pT1 and 58% of pT2 tumors. Moreover, TP53 mutations were found only in 23% of grade G1 and 3% of grade G2 tumors but in 44% of high grade G3 tumors. When the 2 genotypes were combined, we observed that 58% of pTa tumors had the (mutant FGFR3, WT TP53) genotype, whereas 58% of invasive lesions harbored the inverse genotype (WT FGFR3, mutant TP53). The (mutant FGFR3, WT TP53) genotype and the (WT FGFR3, mutant TP53) genotype were detected in 23% and 38% of pT1G3 tumors, respectively. In the subgroup of 92 patients with superficial pTa-T1 bladder tumors we did not find that the TP53 or FGFR3 genotype alone or combined had a predictive value for tumor recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data again represent solid proof for the pivotal role of FGFR3 and TP53 mutations in superficial and invasive bladder tumors, respectively. However, other molecular markers should be identified for borderline pT1G3 bladder tumors, which are probably at the crossroads of these 2 distinct molecular pathways.

Can p53 staining be used to identify patients with aggressive superficial bladder cancer?

Approximately 10% of patients with superficial bladder cancer (pTa/pT1) recur with life-threatening muscle-invasive disease. Identification of these patients has been a major goal of bladder cancer research. In 1994, it was suggested that p53 immunostaining could identify the cancers that would progress and it was proposed that tumours that stain for p53 should be treated aggressively with radiotherapy or cystectomy. Despite the hundreds of studies published since on the relationship between p53 and progression in superficial bladder cancer, the clinical utility of p53 immunostaining has not been resolved because of limitations concerning the numbers of patients and the length of follow-up. This study set out to overcome these limitations by using tissue from a large multicentre trial that recruited 502 patients with a median follow-up of 10 years. Each of 34 patients that had progressed with >/= pT2 disease or had distant metastases or had died from bladder cancer was compared with one or two matched controls. Sections were stained with a mouse monoclonal antibody to p53, pAb1801. In agreement with many of the earlier studies, p53 immunostaining had prognostic significance. The adjusted hazard ratio for time to progression for the pAb1801-positive versus negative group was 2.5, with 95% confidence intervals of 1.05-5.98 (p = 0.039). The other major risk factor that is associated with progression of superficial bladder cancer is pT1G3 disease. Of the 42 pT1G3 cancers, 14 (33%) progressed. The proportion of cancers with p53 staining that progressed was similar to the proportion of pT1G3 cancers that progressed, but neither the sensitivity nor the specificity of association of p53 staining with progression is sufficient to recommend cystectomy in individual patients.

Can biological markers predict recurrence and progression of superficial bladder cancer?

Biological markers that are predictive of recurrence and progression of superficial bladder tumors must provide additional information to that provided by multiplicity, size and grade. Field anomalies in normal appearing urothelium of patients with papillary superficial transitional cell carcinoma have been associated with tumor antigens and chromosome 9 deletions. Also, primary tumors with chromosome 9 deletions are associated with a higher risk of recurrence. Abnormal expression of p53, p21 and Ki-67 cell cycle markers have little predictive value for recurrence. However, p53 overexpression or mutation and decreased expression of p27 are associated with cancer progression and survival. New markers, such as mutations in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 gene (found in 30% of tumors), anomalies of the PTEN gene and vascular endothelial growth factor expression, may have potential and require further evaluation. Molecular fingerprints of superficial tumors with distinct clinical behavior are being rapidly unravelled. Large-scale clinical studies are urgently needed to provide supportive evidence for their incorporation in clinical management.