Familial occurrence of testicular cancer

Cytogenetic and molecular analysis of a family with three brothers afflicted with germ-cell cancer

A thorough cytogenetic investigation and an analysis of detailed questionnaires were performed in a family with three brothers afflicted with germ-cell tumors (GCTs), in an attempt to detect a congenital factor related either to a hereditary genetic background or an environmental/lifestyle influence. One brother had an intracranial tumor in the pineal region and the two others had testicular tumors. Peripheral blood was studied by traditional karyotyping, multicolor-FISH, high-resolution comparative genomic hybridization (HR-CGH), and molecular analysis of selected loci on sex chromosomes (Yq11 region, TSPY, and the androgen receptor gene); however, no abnormalities were detected. The HR-CGH analysis of microdissected histological components of the overt tumors and the adjacent carcinoma in situ demonstrated a pattern of genomic imbalances characteristic for sporadic GCTs, including gain of 12p. The questionnaire and interview revealed a history of different cancers in the extended family, and a possible in utero and/or infantile exposure of the three brothers with GCTs to compounds suspected of endocrine-disrupting properties. Although no genetic aberration was detected in this family, we suspect the presence of a recessive hereditary factor pre-disposing to cancer, which probably was manifested as GCTs in the three brothers because of an adverse effect of an environmental factor on the early germ-cell differentiation.

Genetic analysis of mediastinal nonseminomatous germ cell tumors in children and adolescents

Primary mediastinal germ cell tumors (M-GCTs) represent a heterogeneous group of tumors that varies with regard to age at presentation, histologic differentiation, and outcome. We retrospectively analyzed archival tissue samples of mediastinal mature and immature teratomas (n = 15) and malignant nonseminomatous M-GCTs (n = 20) with comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). The aim of this study was to define distinct genetic subgroups of M-GCT among the pediatric cohort that may differ in their clinical behavior and prognosis. All pure teratomas showed normal CGH profiles. Malignant M-GCTs in infants and children < 8 years old most frequently showed a gain of 1q, 3, and 20q and a loss of 1p, 4q, and 6q. Gain of 12p and sex chromosomal abnormalities were not observed in this age group. In contrast, the gain of 12p was the most common aberration in M-GCTs that arose in children > or = 8 years old. Additional recurrent changes included the loss of chromosome 13 and the gain of chromosome 21. All ten adolescents with malignant M-GCT were male, and five showed a gain of the X chromosome. In two of these five patients, Klinefelter syndrome was confirmed by cytogenetic analysis or by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). In conclusion, CGH analysis of M-GCTs defines distinct genetic subgroups. Mediastinal teratomas show no genetic gains or losses. Malignant M-GCTs in children < 8 years old show the same pattern of gains and losses identified in sacrococcygeal and testicular GCTs at this age, and they lack sex-chromosomal abnormalities. Malignant M-GCTs in children > or = 8 years old show the same genetic profile previously reported in gonadal GCTs at this age. In addition, approximately 50% demonstrate a gain of the X chromosome, consistent with Klinefelter syndrome. Cooperative group studies reveal a significantly better prognosis of malignant M-GCT arising in infants compared to that in adolescents, suggesting that these genetic differences are associated with differences in clinical behavior.

Familial testicular cancer in a single-centre population

Familial occurrence of testicular cancer suggests a genetic predisposition to the disease. A genetic susceptibility may also be reflected by the occurrence of bilateral testicular neoplasms and the high rates of urogenital developmental anomalies in families prone to testicular cancer. In this study, the proportion of familial testicular cancer cases was analyzed retrospectively in a single-centre population of 693 testicular cancer patients treated between 1977 and 1997 and the relative risk (RR) for first-degree relatives of patients was estimated. In addition, the existence of bilateral testicular neoplasms and urogenital developmental anomalies in familial testicular cancer patients was evaluated. 24 of the 693 patients (3.5%) had a first-degree relative with testicular cancer. These 24 cases belonged to 17 families; in 7 of these 17 families both affected first-degree family members were part of the study population of 693 patients. Consequently, the 693 studied patients belonged to a total of 686 families. Thus, the actual proportion of familial testicular cancer was 2.5% (17 of 686 families). The familial cases consisted of 11 brother pairs, including 2 pairs of identical twins and 1 pair which also had two affected cousins, and 6 father-son pairs (in total 36 cases, 12 treated elsewhere). Estimates of the RR to first-degree relatives showed a 9- to 13-fold increased RR to brothers (P < 0.001) and a 2-fold increased RR to fathers (P = non-significant (n.s)) of testicular cancer patients. Among the 36 patients with familial testicular cancer, 2 (5.6%) had bilateral testicular cancer, 4 (11.1%) had undescended testis, 3 (8.3%) had inguinal hernia, and 1 (2.8%) showed renal hypoplasia. The present data on familial occurrence of testicular cancer may lend support to a role of genetic factors in the aetiology of testicular cancer.

Testis risk and prognostic factors. The pathologist's perspective

Pathologic analysis is invaluable in defining the levels of risk for the development of a testicular tumor or for metastasis in a patient with an established testicular cancer. The identification of IGCNU in testicular biopsies defines a group of patients at high risk for subsequent invasive germ cell tumor unless they are treated by orchiectomy or radiotherapy. This method for defining the risk for the development of a testicular tumor is not effective in prepubertal patients, except for those with intersex syndromes. Pathologic analysis of testicular germ cell tumors in patients with clinical stage I disease may allow their stratification into high- and low-risk groups for occult metastases. This would provide a rational basis for recommending intervention or surveillance, respectively. The precise classification of postchemotherapy lesions permits an assessment of the patient's risk for subsequent recurrence and progressive tumor.

Current concepts about testicular cancer

In the past 20 years, testicular cancer, which occurs in the young, has become a curable malignancy; 90% of the patients treated will achieve long-term survival. However, there is a significant morbidity associated with the management of the disease process. The literature was reviewed concerning the current treatment strategies and prognosis, as well as the long-term sequelae of the various diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Surveillance has become a key element in the management of patients with a primary (stage I) testicular non-seminoma. Although approximately 25% of these patients will relapse, 100% survival can be achieved with cisplatin in combination with etoposide and bleomycin (BEP). Patients with a disseminated non-seminoma are usually treated with 4 courses of BEP; an 80% survival rate can be achieved. The long-term effects of chemotherapy include Raynaud's phenomenon, acral paraesthesia, hyperlipidaemia, nephrotoxicity, infertility and hormonal disturbances. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection or resection of residual disease following chemotherapy are associated with a low mortality and morbidity rate, ejaculatory dysfunction excepted. However, with specific modifications in technique (e.g. nerve-sparing) antegrade ejaculation can be preserved in the majority of patients. Radiotherapy is used in stage I and II seminoma. With the conventional dose of 25-30 Gy to the retroperitoneal and ipsilateral iliac lymph nodes, temporary dysfunction of the germ and Leydig cells of the remaining testis may occur by scatter radiation. Patients with advanced seminoma are treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. To date, testicular cancer patients can receive appropriate curative treatment with acceptable acute toxicity, depending on the therapy given. The detrimental effects of late toxicities require careful study and follow-up. However, little attention is paid currently to quality of life aspects, in particular the impact of the disease and its treatment on general well-being, including sexual function.