Ureteroscopy: an outpatient procedure?

Ureteroscopy in the day case setting: it’s worth it! Retrospective single surgeon outcomes analysis during service relocation (inpatient to daycase) in a DGH

Objective:

Due to advances in surgical techniques and anaesthesia, day surgery is now becoming the standard care pathway for many complex procedures traditionally treated through inpatient pathways. Our aim was to study outcomes for patients undergoing rigid and flexible ureteroscopy before and after moving this service from a district general hospital to a day surgery unit.

Methods:

This was a retrospective observational study of 136 consecutive patients undergoing elective ureteroscopy for stone treatment. Half of the patients ( n=68, inpatient group) underwent treatment according to the standard inpatient pathway, while the other half underwent treatment following relocation of this service to a day case unit ( n=68, day case group). Outcomes were length of stay, readmission rate and complications.

Results:

In the inpatient group, 12 patients (17.6%) were discharged home the day of surgery (day 0), 42 patients (61.8%) stayed in hospital for one night. In the day case group, 58 patients (85.3%) were discharged on day 0, nine patients (13.2%) stayed for one night. Length of stay in the day case group was significantly shorter ( P<0.001). Rates of postoperative complications and readmissions were not significantly different.

Conclusion:

Day case ureteroscopy for stone treatment is feasible and safe. It is associated with a significantly reduced length of stay without an increase in postoperative complications or readmission.

[Evaluation of spinal anesthesia in urological outpatient surgery, comparison between two local anesthetics (Chloroprocaine/Bupivacaine)]

INTRODUCTION

Spinal anesthesia in outpatient urology is controversial (longer hospital stay, risk of urinary retention). The main goal was to evaluate outpatient spinal anesthesia and to compare 2 local anesthetics secondarily.

MATERIAL

Monocentric retrospective study including all patients undergoing surgery in urological ambulatory surgery under spinal anesthesia between December 2011 and May 2015, split into two groups according to the local anesthetic used: bupivacaine (BP) and chloroprocaine (CP). Quantitative variables were compared by Student's t-test, qualitative variables by χ² test.

RESULTS

Seventy-one (95%) out of the 75 patients included have been discharged the same day. Discharge was impossible in these cases: patient alone at home (1), bladder clot (1), JJ intolerance (1), delayed micturition (1). The mean duration of the procedure was 27±19min, the SSPI's was 55±31min, the stay's was 360±91min. A total of 45 patients (60%) received BP and 30 (40%) received CP. The mean residence time in SSPI was significantly reduced in the CP group (47±24min vs. 61±34min, P=0.04). One patient experienced urination delay in the BP group with no significant difference. No significant difference for the other criteria studied despite the mean age, which is higher in the CP group (P=0.02).

CONCLUSION

Spinal anesthesia is adapted to ambulatory urology, and does not increase the risk of urinary retention, especially with CP that would decrease the length of stay in SSPI compared to BP.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Flexible and rigid ureteroscopy in outpatient surgery

BACKGROUND

Outpatient surgery is critical to improve health care costs. The aim of the study was to prospectively evaluate the results of outpatient treatment of upper tract urinary stones by rigid or flexible ureteroscopy in a routine care setting.

METHODS

A database was created at the creation of the outpatient surgery department. 87 patients underwent 100 ureteroscopic procedures for urinary lithiasis from June 2013 to March 2015.

RESULTS

Most of our patients were male with 53 men (sex ratio M/F 1.13), with a mean age of 52.9 ± 15 years old (23.4-82.4). 44 % of ureteroscopies performed were flexible ureteroscopies, 31 % rigid ureteroscopies and 25 % associated rigid and flexible ureteroscopies. The average stone load was 10.1 ± 5.7 mm (2-30) The mean operating time was 58.3 ± 21.1 min (20-150). 82.9 % of patients had a single urinary stone and 17.1 % (n = 14) had 2 or more. 114 stones were treated, 57,1 % intrarenal. There were 6 (6 %) postoperative complications: three Clavien stage 2 infections; three Clavien stage 3b complications (two renal colics requiring ureteral stenting 48 h after discharge and 1 symptomatic perirenal urinoma 48 h after discharge). There was one intraoperative complication (1 %): a ureteral wound with contrast leakage. The rate of transfer to conventional hospitalization was 2.2 %. Stone size influenced the stone-free status (p < 0.0001) and the need for more than one session. There was a significant correlation between operative time and stone size above 10 mm (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Flexible and rigid ureteroscopy are safe and efficient procedures for upper urinary tract stones and can be carried out in an outpatient department. Stone size had an impact on postoperative stone-free status and operative time.

Unplanned Hospital Return for Infection following Ureteroscopy-Can We Identify Modifiable Risk Factors?

PURPOSE

Genitourinary infection after ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy is a clinically significant event that may lead to expensive and morbid return to the hospital. We evaluate factors associated with infection after ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy leading to unplanned hospital return.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review evaluating all ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy performed at a single academic institution from April 2011 to August 2014. Data were extracted including patient demographics, comorbidities, surgical encounter characteristics, preoperative urine culture status, antibiotic type/duration and compliance with the AUA Best Practice Statement for antibiotic prophylaxis. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine factors associated with unplanned return to the hospital.

RESULTS

Among 550 patients undergoing ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy 45% (248) were female with an average age of 56.8 (± 14.8) years. Overall 3.4% (19 patients) had an unplanned return for genitourinary infection, with most (78.9%, 15 of 19) requiring inpatient readmission. Overall compliance with AUA Best Practice Statement for antibiotic prophylaxis was 48.7% (268 of 550). Rates of infection related returns were higher in patients undergoing preoperative stenting (84.2% vs 58.6%, p=0.025), those with an operative time greater than 120 minutes (89.5% vs 32.6% p <0.001) and those for whom there was AUA Best Practice Statement compliance for antibiotic prophylaxis (78.9% vs 47.6%, p=0.007). These factors remained significant on multivariate analysis (p <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative stenting and longer operative time were associated with a greater likelihood of serious genitourinary infection after ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy. These patients may warrant additional antibiotic prophylaxis but further research is needed to answer this question more definitively. Interestingly the AUA Best Practice Statement compliance for antibiotic prophylaxis was also associated with a higher risk of infection, underscoring the need for locally appropriate prophylaxis strategies and further study of optimal prophylaxis regimens.

Immediate unplanned hospital admission after outpatient ureteroscopy for stone disease

PURPOSE

Medicare recently changed reimbursement for ureteroscopy, encouraging migration to ambulatory surgical centers. To our knowledge the risk of immediate unplanned hospital admission, which may discourage ureteroscopy at ambulatory surgical centers, is unknown. We determined the rate of immediate unplanned hospital admission, identified factors associated with admission and developed a risk stratification tool to assist with location selection for outpatient ureteroscopy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 1,798 consecutive outpatient ureteroscopic procedures for urolithiasis performed from 1998 to 2008 at our institution. Patients requiring immediate hospital admission were matched 1 to 3 by provider, gender and date with controls who did not require admission. Patient demographics, comorbid conditions, stone history and burden, and operative technique were assessed for impact on admission by bivariate and multivariate logistic regression. A scoring system was developed and estimated admission rates were calculated.

RESULTS

There were 70 immediate unplanned admissions (3.9%). Based on multivariate analysis the factors associated with unplanned admission were any previous admission related to stones (p <0.001), history of psychiatric illness (p = 0.016) and bilateral procedure (p = 0.019). Patients with distal ureteral stones were less likely to require admission (p = 0.026). One point was added for each positive factor and 1 was subtracted for a distal ureteral stone. A risk factor score of 2 or greater in 9% of the cohort was associated with an estimated 20.0% admission rate while lower scores in 91% of the cohort were associated with a 2.9% admission rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Readily identifiable factors can stratify the risk of unplanned hospital admission and help guide the selection of the most appropriate facility for outpatient ureteroscopy.

Nonstented versus routine stented ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy: a prospective randomized trial

We conducted a prospective, randomized study to evaluate whether postoperative ureteral stenting is necessary after ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy. A total of 115 consecutive patients with distal or middle ureteral calculi amenable to ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy were prospectively randomized into stented group (n = 58) and nonstented group (n = 57). The stent was routinely placed in the treated ureter for 2 weeks. The outcomes were measured with postoperative patient symptoms, stone-free rates, early and late postoperative complications, and cost-effectiveness. The postoperative symptoms were measured with Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ). All patients completed a 12-week follow-up. There was no significant difference between two groups with respect to the patient age, stone size, stone location and mean operative time. According to the USSQ, the symptoms of the stented group were significantly worse compared to the nonstented group (P = 0.0001). In the stented group, two patients had high fever for 1 week after the operation, stent migration was found in two patients, and the stents had to be removed earlier in five patients because of severe pain or hematuria. The cost of the stented group was significantly higher than the nonstented group. The stone-free rate was 100% in both groups. No hydronephrosis or ureteral stricture was detected by intravenous pyelogram in the 12th week postoperative follow-up. In conclusion, we believe that routine stenting after ureteroscopic intracorporeal lithotripsy with the holmium laser is not necessary as long as the procedure is uncomplicated for distal or middle ureteral calculis less than 2 cm.

Day-case rigid and flexible ureteroscopy

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of rigid and flexible ureteroscopy as a day-surgery procedure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients requiring elective ureteroscopy from March 2004 were considered for a day-surgery procedure. The standard day-surgery exclusions existed but there were no urological criteria for exclusion. A single consultant urologist performed or supervised all procedures.

RESULTS

A total of 64 patients underwent 50 rigid and 14 flexible procedures. Six diagnostic ureteroscopies were performed. There was a 96% stone clearance rate. Five patients required an unplanned admission within the first 2 weeks' postoperatively. Three of these patients were admitted on the day of surgery, two for pain and one for social reasons. Two patients were admitted at 24 h and 48 h, respectively, for urinary retention.

CONCLUSIONS

Ureteroscopy, both rigid and flexible, is a safe procedure for the day-surgery setting. Routine use of prophylactic antibiotics, intravenous non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs resulted in an acceptable re-admission rate.

Patients? experiences at home after day case cystoscopy

AIM

To determine patients' problems with day case cystoscopy and their problem solving ways and patients' self-care at home.

BACKGROUND

Day surgery has become increasingly common in the last 20 years. Cystoscopic procedures are increasingly being carried out as a diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.

DESIGN AND METHOD

This descriptive/prospective study comprised 50 patients undergoing day case cystoscopic procedures in the university hospital of Turkey. The data were collected using telephone interview three days after the procedure. The two questionnaire used were Symptom Measurement Questionnaire and Symptom Management Questionnaire. Discharge information and written instruction was given to all patients.

RESULTS

It was found in the investigation that the most common problems experienced by the patients were tiredness, haematuria, dysuria, pain over bladder and difficulty in voiding after flexible cystoscopy in first day. Generally, urinary elimination problems were experienced by majority of the patients. At second day, these problems were also common. The mean score for all problems decreased after three days. The patients stated that they were able to deal with their symptoms either independently or to a lesser extent with assistance of a carer. But they were unable to deal with problems such as especially haematuria.

CONCLUSION

Problems experiences by the patients at home after cystoscopy influenced some daily living activities. The problems related to voiding are more frequently observed after cystoscopy. Although some these problems are related to the procedures, some were present previously.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

This findings indicate that patient-centred care should be strengthened at home in urological day surgery.

Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for distal ureteric calculi: efficacy and patient satisfaction

OBJECTIVE

We compared the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and ureteroscopy (URS) for the treatment of distal ureteral calculi with respect to patient satisfaction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a prospective study where a total of 212 patients with solitary, radiopaque distal ureteral calculi were treated with ESWL (n = 92) using Dornier lithotriptor S (MedTech Europe GmbH) or URS (n = 120). Patient and stone characteristics, treatment parameters, clinical outcomes, and patient satisfaction were assessed for each group.

RESULTS

The 2 groups were comparable in regard to patient age, sex, stone size, and side of treatment. The stone-free status for ESWL and URS at 3 months was 81.5% and 97.5%, respectively (p < 0.0001). In addition, 88% of patients who underwent ESWL versus 20% who underwent URS were discharged home the day of procedure. Minor complications occurred in 3.3% and 8.3% of the ESWL and URS groups, respectively (p = 0.127). No ureteral perforation or stricture occurred in the URS group. Postoperative flank pain and dysuria were more severe in the URS than ESWL group, although the differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.16). Patient satisfaction was high for both groups, including 94% for URS and 80% for ESWL (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

URS is more effective than ESWL for the treatment of distal ureteral calculi. ESWL was more often performed on an outpatient basis, and showed a trend towards less flank pain and dysuria, fewer complications and quicker convalescence. Patient satisfaction was significantly higher for URS according to the questionnaire used in this study.

Safety and Efficacy of Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy for Ureteral Calculi Under Sedoanalgesia – A Prospective Study

OBJECTIVE

To establish the safety and efficacy of ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) under sedoanalgesia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study was conducted at Department of Urology (Banaras Hindu University, India) among 124 patients with ureteral stones, between July 2000 and August 2003. Majority of the patients (59.68%) presented with lower ureteric calculi, 24.19% presented with upper ureteric calculi and 16.13% had middle ureteric calculi. All patients were given injection diclofenac sodium (75 mg) promethazine hydrochloride (12.5 mg) deep intramuscular 30 minutes the before procedure. Injection midazolam 0.03 mg/kg body weight slowly given intravenously immediately before the procedure for achieving sedation. Injection fentanyl 50 mcg intravenously given slowly just before introducing the ureteroscope into ureter for achieving intravenous analgesia. Patients were observed for few hours after completion of procedure and oral questions were asked as per proforma, which included tolerance, intensity of pain and percentage of pain experienced by the patients. Patients were discharged thereafter.

RESULTS

87.10% of patients opined that the procedure was acceptable. Only 4.84% opined this procedure was painful. According to present pain intensity score (PPI) in this study 79.03 patients experienced only mild pain, 11.29% cases rated procedure as discomforting, 6.45 rated procedure as distressing and only 3.23% rated as horrible procedure. As per visual analogue scale for assessment of pain 80.65 of cases rated only 20% pain score (in a scale of 0-100). 9.68% cases rated 30% and 6.45% rated 50%. Only two patients in middle ureteric group rated 100% pain. Overall success rate in fragmenting stone was 91.94, where as for lower ureteric calculi it was 97.30%; for upper and, middle ureteric calculi it was 86.66% and 80%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Ureteroscopic lithotripsy can be performed on day care basis under sedoanalgesia which is fairly tolerated by the patients with unremarkable complications and difficulty.

Current trends in ureteroscopy

The advances of technology are having substantial ramifications in medicine and in urology, in particular. This article discusses these advances and explores current trends in ureteroscopy.

Ureteroscopy: effect of technology and technique on clinical practice

PURPOSE

Technical advances in ureteroscopy allow for more aggressive management of upper tract pathology. We evaluate to what extent clinical practice and treatment efficacy have been impacted by improvements in technology and technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 1998, 176 consecutive patients underwent 182 ureteroscopic procedures at our institution. Retrospective chart review was performed. Factors such as clinical indication, pathology location, type of ureteroscope, procedure duration, procedure success, complication rate and length of stay were evaluated. Data from the 1998 cohort were compared to those obtained from a cohort of patients from 1992. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square test.

RESULTS

Overall stone extraction rate was 94.4% (1992) vs 88.5% (1998) (p = 0.05). Proximal stones were treated in 13.5% (1998) vs 28.3% (1998) of cases. Distal stone extraction rate was 97.2% (1992) vs 95.1% (1998) (p = 0.43) and proximal stone extraction rate was 76.5% (1992) vs 71.9% (1998) (p = 0.73). Diagnostic inspection success rate was 98.3% (1992) vs 98.3% (1998). Use of flexible ureteroscopy was 11.5% (1992) vs 29.4% (1998). Complication rate was 12% (1992) vs 10.2% (1998) (p = 0.76). Of the cases 76.1% were outpatient in 1998 vs only 50% in 1992.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent advances in ureteroscopic technology permit more aggressive instrumentation of the upper tract as reflected in higher use of flexible ureteroscopy and more frequent attempts to manage proximal ureteral calculi. These advances have not translated into better efficacy of calculus treatment. Furthermore, our data reflect a nationwide trend toward outpatient treatment.

A prospective randomized controlled trial on ureteral stenting after ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy

PURPOSE

A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate whether postoperative ureteral stenting is necessary after ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 58 patients with unilateral ureteral stones were randomized into either stented or unstented groups. Ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy was performed using a semirigid ureteroscope (6.5/7Fr) and holmium laser without ureteral orifice dilation. There were no selection criteria regarding stone size, location, preoperative ureteral obstruction and hydronephrosis. Endoscopic evidence of stone impaction or mucosal edema/damage did not exclude a patient from the study. Ureteral perforation on completion retrograde pyelogram was the only intraoperative criterion for study exclusion. Postoperative pain scores and symptoms were recorded. Excretory urography was performed to document stone-free status and stricture formation. Radionuclide scan was performed selectively to exclude functional obstruction when ureteral narrowing was found on excretory urogram.

RESULTS

Mean stone size +/- SD was 9.7 +/- 4.0 mm. (range 4 to 27). Proximal ureteral stones accounted for 43% of all stones. Stented and unstented groups were comparable with respect to demographic data, stone parameters, preoperative obstruction and hydronephrosis. There was no significant difference in operating time, laser energy used, stone impaction and mucosal edema/damage between the 2 groups. Postoperative pain and symptoms were more severe and frequent (p <0.05) in the stented group. However, there was no difference in the incidence of postoperative sepsis and unplanned medical visits. The stone-free and stricture formation rates showed no statistical difference between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Ureteral stenting is not necessary after uncomplicated ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy for ureteral stones. Ureteral stent increases the incidence of pain and urinary symptoms but does not prevent postoperative urinary sepsis and unplanned medical visits. Severity of preoperative obstruction and intraoperative ureteral trauma were not shown to be determining factors for stenting.

Current management of urolithiasis: progress or regress?

PURPOSE

To assess the impact of the development of less powerful second- and third-generation shockwave lithotripters on surgical stone therapy in light of recent advances in ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy. As such, we sought to identify current trends in the treatment of stone disease, both at our university medical center and nationally, and to contrast them with the corresponding data from 1990.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All urolithiasis procedures (ureteroscopy, SWL, open surgery, and percutaneous stone removal) performed in 1998 were compared with all urolithiasis procedures performed 8 years earlier (1990) at a single institution (Washington University, St. Louis). In addition, Medicare data for each year from 1988 through 2000 were collected from the Health Care Financing Administration to assess the national trends for open stone surgery, ureteroscopic stone removal, SWL, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

RESULTS

At Washington University, the number of percutaneous stone removals remained stable; however, the overall number of ureteroscopies increased by 53%, while the number of SWLs, decreased by 15%. The Medicare data likewise reflect a marked decrease in open stone surgery and a marked increase in ureteroscopic stone surgery with a slight increase in SWL. Utilization of percutaneous nephrolithotomy remained unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe this trend toward ureteroscopy is attributable to several factors: improved, smaller rigid and flexible ureteroscopes; the availability of more effective intracorporeal lithotripters (e.g., pneumatic and holmium laser), and the lack of development of lower cost, more effective SWL. This is an unfortunate trend, as we are moving away from the noninvasive treatment that was the hallmark of urolithiasis therapy at the beginning of the last decade toward more invasive endoscopic therapy. Increased research efforts in SWL technology are sorely needed.

Day-case ureteroscopy: an observational study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcome after day-case ureteroscopy (used in diagnosing and managing ureteric disease, primarily urolithiasis), as awareness of reduced resources has resulted in increasing pressure to undertake procedures in a day-surgery setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients presenting to the unit and requiring ureteroscopy between May 1995 and May 2000 were considered for a day-surgery procedure. The assessment of suitability comprised anaesthetic and social factors; no urological criteria precluded a day-surgery procedure. Outcomes after day-case ureteroscopy, including immediate or delayed admissions and subsequent inpatient management, were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Sixty-three day-case ureteroscopies were performed on 56 patients (mean age 47 years, range 19-78); eight procedures were diagnostic. Therapeutic ureteroscopies included one balloon dilatation of a ureteric stricture and 54 procedures for urolithiasis, with 98% stone clearance. Most patients were discharged with a JJ stent in situ. Of nine patients requiring immediate admission, seven were for pain control; eight were discharged on the following day. Seven patients required delayed admission 1-13 days after the procedure, three for stent-related symptoms and three for infection. No significant predictors of immediate or delayed admission were identified, although antibiotic prophylaxis was associated with a reduced admission rate.

CONCLUSION

Ureteroscopy can be used successfully as a planned day-case procedure in a dedicated day-surgery unit, with few patients requiring hospitalization. Implementation of analgesia protocols and routine antibiotic prophylaxis may reduce admission after day-case ureteroscopy.

Outpatient ureteroscopy: predictive factors for postoperative events

OBJECTIVES

To identify risk factors that can predict the postoperative events of outpatient ureteroscopy.

METHODS

The data of 329 consecutive patients who underwent outpatient ureteroscopy from January 1996 to July 2000 were analyzed. Patient selection for outpatient surgery was based solely on their general medical status and social factors. Eighty-three percent of the procedures were therapeutic ureteroscopy. The reported postoperative events included sleep disturbances, postoperative pain score, emesis, unplanned admission, and other complications. These were compared with the various patient and operative factors. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify the predictive factors for different postoperative events.

RESULTS

The overall success rate of ureteroscopic access to the pathologic site was 99.7%. Most of the therapeutic ureteroscopy performed was ureteroscopic lithotripsy (93%), with a stone-free rate of 91%. Ninety-seven percent of the operations were completed within 90 minutes, and 98% of patients were fit for discharge within 5 hours. Female patients reported more symptoms on the way home (25.8% versus 16%, P = 0.047) and more postoperative emesis (14.4% versus 2.1%, P <0.001). The postoperative pain score on day 1 was higher if the operation had lasted more than 60 minutes (2.4 versus 1.5, P = 0.002). Patients who received postoperative stenting had a higher postoperative pain score on day 3 (1.1 versus 0.4, P <0.001) and a higher complication rate compared with those who required no postoperative stenting (16.8% versus 4%, P <0.001). No predictive factors for unplanned admission were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Ureteroscopy can be successfully performed in an outpatient setting. Although the early postoperative pain was associated with nature of the operation (which could not be changed), the subsequent postoperative pain and complications were associated with ureteral stenting, which could be reduced by selective stenting. Unplanned admissions could not be predicted.

Outpatient ureteroscopic lithotripsy: selective internal stenting and factors enhancing success

PURPOSE

To evaluate a policy of selective, short-duration internal stenting after outpatient ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 1997 to April 1998, 62 patients (34 male, 28 female) with a mean age of 50 (range 21-80) years underwent outpatient ureteroscopic lithotripsy using a holmium laser (365 microm; 0.5-1.4J/5-10 Hz) and 6F/7.5F semirigid ureteroscope. Internal stents were inserted selectively in patients with severe preoperative obstruction (intravenous urogram finding), tight stone impaction (endoscopic finding), or significant residual obstruction (on-table retrograde pyelogram finding) despite stone clearance. Patient demographics, stone measures, stone clearance rates, complications, postoperative pain scores, analgesic requirement, and follow-up imaging were compared for the stented and unstented patients.

RESULTS

With the present criteria of selective internal stenting, stents were inserted in 56% of the patients for a mean duration of 3.6 weeks. Excluding those patients with residual stones requiring further interventions, the stenting rate was 39% with a mean duration of 1.9 weeks. There was no difference in patient characteristics, stone burden, and stone levels between the stented and unstented group. The mean operating time for the unstented group was shorter than for the stented group (45.6 minutes v 56.6 minutes; P = 0.03). The stone clearance rates were similar for the two groups (96% v 97%), but the complication rate of the stented group was higher (8.6% v 3.7%). The mean postoperative pain score and analgesic requirement were similar in the two groups on postoperative day 1 but significantly less in the unstented group on day 3.

CONCLUSIONS

The criteria for selective internal stenting are useful in determining when a stent should be used. By omitting the stent insertion in the absence of these criteria, operating time, postoperative pain, and analgesic requirement were reduced without increasing the complication rate. Ureteral stricturing was absent despite the low stenting rate.

A new generation of semirigid fiberoptic ureteroscopes

BACKGROUND

Further advances in endoscope technology have allowed the development of a new generation of tightly packed fiberoptics encased within a rigid ureteroscope. The tips of these semirigid ureteroscopes measure between 5.0F and 11.9F, and their working channels measure between 1.8F and 5.5F, which allows passage of routine endoscopc instruments. Additionally, several manufacturers have recently produced straight-channel fiberoptic semirigid endoscopes with an offset lens which allow usage of rigid lithotripsy devices. New fiber-packing techniques provide numerous pixels within the image bundle. These ureteroscopes have varied distal lens systems, but all have excellent vision in the field of view.

METHODS

Over the past 28 months, we have performed transurethral ureteroscopy in 187 patients, having utilized semirigid ureteroscopes in 158 patients for diagnostic procedures (8.7 %), stone manipulation (78.7 %), removal of migrated stents (4.4%), and surgery of stricture, tumor, or foreign bodies (8.2%). In more than 50% of our cases, ureteral dilation was not necessary, and the semirigid ureteroscope was passed to the area of interest without difficulty.

RESULTS

We accessed the site of pathology in 96.2% of patients. Overall, complications occurred in 6.9% of patients. However, of these problems, 93.6% were small ureteral perforations (only three of which were caused by the semirigid ureteroscope itself), and all cases but one were managed successfully by a ureteral stent. No postoperative strictures were noted.

CONCLUSION

This new generation of semirigid fiberoptic ureteroscopes represents another significant advance in the endourologic management of ureteral disease.

Two-year experience with ureteral stones: extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy v ureteroscopic manipulation

Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) and ureteroscopic manipulation became the standard treatments for ureteral stones in recent years. There still exists significant debate as to the most appropriate treatment modality for ureteral stones. During a period of 2 years, from January 1994 to December 1995, 651 patients with ureteral stones were treated, and 589 patients were retrospectively reviewed, excluding 62 patients with incomplete follow-up. Four hundred forty-two patients were treated with SWL using the MPL 9000 with ultrasonic guidance and 115 patients with ureteroscopic manipulations using 7.9F to 11.5F rigid and semirigid ureteroscopes. In SWL treatments, the overall stone-free rate was 74.7% with one session. The stone-free rate was significantly affected by the size of stones, being 83.6% when the stone was <1.0 cm and 42.1% when the stone was >1.0 cm. The stone-free rate after a second SWL session was 84.4% and was 90.3% after a third session. The stone-free rates according to the site of the stone were 72.4 (proximal), 70.0 (mid), and 80.2% (distal) after a single session. In ureteroscopic manipulation, an overall stone-free rate of 87.8% was obtained regardless of the size of the stones. The success rates according to the location of stones were 75.0 (proximal), 94.6 (mid), and 86.4% (distal). Open ureterolithotomy was performed in 32 patients, with a 100% success rate. In our study, the size of the stones was the most important factor influencing the success rate of SWL treatment. We consider ureteroscopic manipulation as the first-line treatment modality when the stone is >1.0 cm, especially if it is in the distal ureter. Proper selection of patients for in situ SWL or ureteroscopy would improve the results of initial treatment.

Holmium laser lithotripsy for ureteral calculi: an outpatient procedure

A retrospective review was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of ureteroscopic lithotripsy using the holmium laser with a semirigid endoscope in a newly established day surgery center. In 1996, 69 consecutive patients (40 male and 29 female) with a mean age of 46.7 (range 21-73) years and ASA status I or II underwent ureteroscopic lithotripsy for their ureteral calculi using the holmium laser (365-micron fiber; power setting 0.5-1.4 J/5 Hz) and 8.5F semirigid ureteroscope in a day surgery setting. Stone features, postoperative pain scores, readmissions, and complications were evaluated. Eighteen upper, 17 middle, and 34 lower ureteral stones were treated, with a mean size measuring 12.1 (5-45) mm. The mean operative time was 61 minutes including the anesthetic time (range 15-150 minutes), and the success rate was 91% (63/69). The complication rate was 10% (7/69) including four unscheduled readmissions (6%). Telephone follow-up on postoperative Day 1 and Day 3 revealed mean pain scores of 2 and 1, respectively (on a 0-10 scale) and an analgesic requirement of 1 tablet of Dologesic (containing 32.5 mg of dextropropoxyphene + 320 mg of paracetamol) four times a day on both days. Ureteroscopic lithotripsy using the holmium laser and a semirigid endoscope is highly successful and well tolerated and carries a low complication rate. It is indicated as an ambulatory and minimally invasive treatment modality in low-risk patients with ureteral stones.

Ureteroscopy: current practice and long-term complications

PURPOSE

We compared a current cohort of patients who underwent ureteroscopy to a cohort from the early 1980s to determine changes in success, indications and long-term complications of the procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A chart review was performed of 194 patients who underwent 209 ureteroscopic procedures at our institution during 1992. This group was then statistically compared to 317 patients who underwent 346 ureteroscopies between 1982 and 1985.

RESULTS

The current indications for ureteroscopy were calculus extraction (67% of the cases), diagnosis (28%) and stent manipulation (5%). These indications differed from those of the early series, in which 84% of all ureteroscopies were performed for calculus extraction and 16% for diagnosis. Overall ureteroscopic success rate increased from 86 to 96% (p < 0.001). Success of stone extraction improved from 89 to 95% (p = 0.08, distal success rate 95 to 97% and proximal success rate 72 to 77%). Success of diagnostic inspections increased from 73 to 98% (p < 0.001). In the early series failure was usually due to inability to traverse the ureter (54% of the cases), while currently failure is due almost exclusively to impassable ureteral strictures (63%). The overall complication rate decreased from 20 to 12% (p = 0.01) and the rate of significant complications decreased from 6.6 to 1.5% (p < 0.05). Clinical followup (mean 36 months) for all patients and radiological followup (mean 9.8 months) for 67% of eligible patients detected only 1 ureteral stricture. The remaining patients were asymptomatic after the ureteroscopic procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Improvements in ureteroscope design, accessories and technique have led to a significant increase in the success of diagnostic and therapeutic ureteroscopy while decreasing morbidity. Outpatient ureteroscopic stone extraction, particularly for distal ureteral calculi, is almost uniformly successful with low morbidity. The long-term complication rate of ureteroscopy is 0.5%.

The case for primary endoscopic management of upper urinary tract calculi: II. Cost and outcome assessment of 112 primary ureteral calculi

OBJECTIVES

To compare extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) with endoscopic lithotripsy to establish the more efficacious and cost-effective treatment for ureteral calculi.

METHODS

The records of 112 patients with primary ureteral calculi treated at one center with either ESWL or endoscopic lithotripsy were retrospectively reviewed. Follow-up data at 1 and 3 months were obtained in all patients. Success was defined as complete clearance of a stone burden in the endoscopy group. In the ESWL group patients with a residual, asymptomatic 2-mm fragment were also considered successful treatments. The number of auxiliary procedures, retreatments, postoperative office visits, and imaging studies required before a patient was considered stone free was defined. The impact of these variables on global costs was carefully reviewed.

RESULTS

Patients with ureteral calculi primarily treated with ESWL or ureteroscopic lithotripsy had stone-free rates after a single session of 45% versus 95% at 1-month follow-up, and 62% versus 97% at 3-month follow-up. Retreatment and auxiliary procedure rates were significantly higher in the ESWL group (31% versus 3%). The mean number of postoperative visits and imaging studies until a patient was stone free was also higher in the ESWL group (2.07 versus 1.13). Operative treatment costs were similar for both modalities, but overall costs weighed heavily against ESWL.

CONCLUSIONS

ESWL remains the treatment of choice for moderately sized, uncomplicated renal calculi. In skilled hands, ureteroscopic lithotripsy is by far the most expeditious and cost-effective means of clearing a ureteral stone burden.