Pilot study to evaluate impact of a policy of adjuvant chemotherapy for high risk stage 1 malignant teratoma on overall relapse rate of stage 1 cancer patients

Single-course bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (1xBEP) as adjuvant treatment in testicular nonseminoma clinical stage 1: outcome, safety, and risk factors for relapse in a population-based study

Introduction:

Clinical stage 1 (CS1) nonseminomatous (NS) germ cell tumors involve a 30% probability of relapse upon surveillance. Adjuvant chemotherapy with one course of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (1xBEP) can reduce this risk to <5%. However, 1xBEP results are based solely on five controlled trials from high-volume centers. We analyzed the outcome in a real-life population.

Patients and Methods:

In a multicentric international study, 423 NS CS1 patients receiving 1xBEP were retrospectively evaluated. Median follow-up was 37 (range, 6–89) months. Primary end points were relapse-free and overall survival evaluated after 5 years. We also looked at associations of relapse with clinico-pathological factors using stratified Kaplan–Meier methods and Cox regression models. Treatment modality and outcome of recurrences were analyzed descriptively.

Results:

The 5-year relapse-free survival rate was 96.2%. Thirteen patients (3.1%; 95% confidence interval, 1.65–5.04%) relapsed after a median time of 13 months, of which 10 were salvaged (77%). Relapses were mostly confined to retroperitoneal nodes. Three patients succumbed, two to disease progression and one to toxicity of chemotherapy. Pathological stage >pT2 was significantly associated with relapse rate.

Conclusion:

The relapse rate of 3.1% found in this population of NS CS1 patients treated with 1xBEP at the routine care level was not inferior to the median rate of 2.3% reported from a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Also, the cure rate of relapses of 77% is consistent with the previously reported rate of 80%. This study clearly shows that the 1xBEP regimen represents a safe treatment for NS CS1 patients.

Current Concepts in Management of Stage I NSGCT

While about 50% of non- seminomatous germ cell tumors of the testes present as clinical stage I (CSI), further management of these patients continues to be mired in controversy. Active surveillance is a frontline option for low- risk CS I patients and according to some, even the high- risk ones with high embryonal carcinoma (ECA) component and vascular invasion (VI). However, it carries the disadvantage of long- term surveillance, the need for prolonged chemotherapy in case of recurrence and the possibility of secondary malignancies due to radiation exposure from frequent CT scans. One or two cycles of BEP chemotherapy is a popular alternative to active surveillance which carries a very low relapse rate, but valid concerns about overtreatment of a majority of patients, with the attendant chemotherapy- related toxicity exist. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection has been used as a means of avoiding chemotherapy, especially in high- risk patients, but carries the disadvantage of a high surgical morbidity and complications. As with any major surgical procedure, the best results are dependent on the experience and skill of the individual surgeon.

Management of clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors

Therapeutic options for clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumor include active surveillance, adjuvant chemotherapy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND). Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) determines risk of recurrence, as those without LVI have 15% risk of relapse on surveillance while those with LVI have a 50% risk. This stratifies patients into high risk(LVI+) and low risk(LVI-) groups which direct treatment recommendations. Surveillance is preferred for those with low risk disease, and is an option for those with high risk disease, as at least half are over-treated with other options. Adjuvant chemotherapy is an option for all patients as it can eradicate micrometastatic disease and reduce recurrence by at least 90%. RPLND benefits patients with low volume retroperitoneal disease with a cure rate of RPLND alone at approximately 70%. All three treatment modalities have similar survival rates approaching 100% but differing potential morbidities, which, along with patient preferences and compliance, should guide treatment decisions.

[Chemotherapy in male external genital organs (testicular and penile cancer)]

AIM

To describe drugs used in the chemotherapy of testis and penis neoplasms.

MATERIAL

Bibliographical search was performed from the database Medline (National Library of Medicine, PubMed) and websites of the HAS and the ANSM. The search was focused on the characteristics, the mode of action, the efficiency and the side effects of the various drugs concerned.

RESULTS

Nowadays, the chemotherapy is perfectly codified in adjuvant treatment or in first-line treatment of metastatic testis cancer. A single dose of carboplatin for seminoma testicular (stage I) in adjuvant treatment situation is one of the latest advances. Concerning penis cancer, the optimal protocols validated by a high level of evidence are missing.

CONCLUSION

The chemotherapy in testis and penis neoplasms knew few advances in recent years. So, it is necessary to include patients in clinical research protocols.

[Results of the randomised phase III study of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group. Retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy versus one cycle BEP as adjuvant therapy for non-seminomatous testicular tumours in clinical stage I]

OBJECTIVE

As 30% of non-seminomas in clinical stage I will progress during active surveillance, alternative adjuvant strategies of 2 cycles of bleomycin, etoposid, cisplatin (BEP) or nerve sparing retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (RPLND) can be offered. The risk of relapse is reduced to 2% and 10%, respectively. Without prognostic markers and with lowered toxicity it is postulated that only one cycle of BEP could significantly reduce the recurrence rate in comparison to RPLND.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1996 and 2005, 382 patients were randomly assigned to receive either RPLND (n=191) or 1 cycle of BEP (n=191). In accordance with the protocol, 174 patients were treated with 1 cycle of BEP and 173 underwent RPLND. The primary study end-point was a reduction of recurrence from 10% after RPLND to a maximum of 3% after 1 cycle of BEP.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up of 4.7 years, there were 2 and 13 recurrences in the according-to-protocol population with chemotherapy and surgery, respectively. The difference between chemotherapy (1.15%) and surgery (7.5%) was statistically significant (p=0.0033). The tumor-specific survival was 100%.

CONCLUSION

This largest randomized trial investigating treatment strategies in clinical stage I non-seminomas (AUO AH 01/94) showed the superiority of one cycle BEP over RPLND. The data obtained represent the basis for a reduced chemotherapy.

Risk-adapted management for patients with clinical stage I non-seminomatous germ cell tumour of the testis

Testis cancer is the most common cancer in young men and its incidence continues to rise. Even if prognosis is considered as good, a group with bad prognosis still remains. We aimed to evaluate whether two courses of chemotherapy after orchiectomy in patients with clinical stage I, non-seminomatous germ cell testicular tumour at high risk of relapse, will spare patients additional chemotherapy or surgery. High-risk patients had one or more of the following: preorchiectomy alpha-fetoprotein level of 80 ng/dl, 80% embryonal cell carcinoma or greater, vessel invasion in the primary tumour and tumour stage pT2 or greater. Low-risk patients had none of these factors or had 50% teratoma or more without vessel invasion. High-risk patients were offered two 21-day courses of outpatient chemotherapy consisting cisplatin, etoposide and bleomycin (BEP). Low-risk patients were observed. Of the 108 patients, we classified 71 as high risk and 37 as low risk of relapse. All of the high-risk patients received two courses of BEP chemotherapy. Low-risk patients were kept on close-up. The median follow-up was 26 months (range 10-60). Of the 71 patients in high-risk group, 3 relapsed with viable cancer and required additional chemotherapy and 1 patient with normal biomarkers and a late-appearing mass underwent retroperitoneal lympadenectomy for mature teratoma. All 4 relapsed patients were in high-risk group and presently they are free of disease. None of the 37 patients at low risk of recurrences developed relapse. We recommend two courses of adjuvant chemotherapy after postorchiectomy for high-risk patients with stage I non-seminomatous germ cell tumour of the testis. Adjuvant chemotherapy for these patients results in a low relapse and morbidity, wich compares favourably with the results of surveillance or RPLND. This well-tolerated approach may spare patients additional surgery or protracted chemotherapy, reduce the cost and eliminate the compliance problems associated with intensive follow up of high-risk patients.

Current management of stage I testicular non-seminomatous germ cell tumours

Testicular germ cell tumors represent the most common malignancies in young males between the ages of 15 and 35; 50% of those with non-seminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT) have clinical stage I at diagnosis. Predictors for relapse include lymphovascular invasion, percentage of embryonal-cell carcinoma component, absence of yolk-sack histology and MIB1 proliferation rate. Therapeutic options following orchidectomy in stage I NSGCT comprise nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND), surveillance or adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Using a risk adapted approach, in about 50% of patients with clinical stage I NSGCT surveillance is favored in patients with good compliance. Adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended for patients at high risk for developing metastatic disease. Non-seminomatous germ cell testicular cancer is a curable neoplasia. All available treatment modalities produce excellent results, with a long-term survival of almost 100%. Consequently, therapy-induced toxicity is an important concern in the management of these patients. An individually tailored approach that takes into account the prognostic factor profile, as well as the patients' preferences and their ability to comply with treatment, is the key for the successful management of stage I testicular cancer.

Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: does it still have a role in the management of clinical stage I nonseminomatous testis cancer? A European perspective

CONTEXT

Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (L-RPLND) is not recommended as standard tool in European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines.

OBJECTIVE

To update the role of L-RPLND in patients with clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumour (NSGCT) compared to open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (O-RPLND).

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic literature search from 1992 to 2008 was performed in Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane. The largest series from each group was considered. Comparative analysis was based on raw data of series published in 2000 and later.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Results of >800 patients treated by L-RPLND reported in 34 articles were analyzed. Lymph node dissection (LND) was based on modified templates, removing an average of 16 (5-36) lymph nodes. At experienced centres, complication rates were 15.6% (9.4-25.7), including 2% (0-5) retrograde ejaculation and 1.7% (0-6) reintervention. Operating room times are longer compared to O-RPLND (204 vs 186min). Five publications with a follow-up of 63 (36-89) mo include 557 patients. One hundred twenty-six of 140 (90%) patients with positive nodes (25%, range: 17-38) received adjuvant chemotherapy, resulting in a local relapse rate of 1.4% (0.7-2.3) with no in-field recurrence; rate of distant relapses was 3.3% (1.8-4.6), including one port-site metastasis; and rate of biochemical failure was 0.9% (0.7-2.3). Two of 14 patients with positive nodes (pN1) who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy relapsed, both 8 mo after surgery, and were salvaged by chemotherapy. Compared with O-RPLND, there was no difference in relapse rates, percentage of patients receiving chemotherapy (29% vs 31%), chemotherapy (CTx) cycles per cohort (0.6), rate of salvage surgery (1.2% vs 1.5%), and patients with no evidence of disease (NED; 100% vs 99.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

L-RPLND offers similar staging accuracy and long-term outcome to O-RPLND. In a late series of experienced L-RPLND centres, there was a trend towards fewer complications. L-RPLND represents a valuable tool for experienced laparoscopic surgeons. Further studies must focus on the curative potential of the procedure in pathologic stage IIA.

Randomized phase III trial comparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection with one course of bleomycin and etoposide plus cisplatin chemotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of clinical stage I Nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumors: AUO trial AH 01/94 by the German Testicular Cancer Study Group

PURPOSE

Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) and adjuvant chemotherapy are two adjuvant treatment options for patients with clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors of the testis (NSGCT). Aim of this trial was to prove the advantage of one cycle of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) chemotherapy compared with RPLND in terms of recurrence.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1996 and 2005, 382 patients were randomly assigned to receive either RPLND (n = 191) or one course of BEP (n = 191) after orchidectomy. The primary study end point was the rate of recurrence. The trial was powered to detect a 7% reduction (from 10% to 3%) of recurrence with chemotherapy compared with surgery.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 4.7 years, two and 15 recurrences were observed in the intention-to-treat population with chemotherapy and surgery, respectively (P = .0011). The difference in the 2-year recurrence-free survival rate between chemotherapy (99.46%; 95% CI, 96.20% to 99.92%) and surgery (91.87%; 95% CI, 86.87% to 95.02%) was 7.59% (95% CI, 3.13% to 12.05%). The hazard ratio to experience a tumor recurrence with surgery as opposed to chemotherapy was 7.937 (95% CI, 1.808 to 34.48).

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the largest randomized trial investigating adjuvant treatment strategies in clinical stage I NSGCT, which showed the superiority of one course BEP over RPLND performed according to community standards to prevent recurrence. Although not standard treatment, one course of BEP is active in an unselected group of patients with clinical stage I disease and merits further investigation.

[Testicular cancer--is there an indication for adjuvant or neoadjuvant systemic therapy?]

Testicular cancer represents between 1 and 1.5% of male neoplasms and 5% of all urological tumours. There are indications for adjuvant or neoadjuvant systemic therapy in all stages of seminomatous and non-seminomatous testicular cancer. The treatment decision is strongly stage dependent. The primary treatment of choice for advanced disease is chemotherapy. In earlier stages a risk-adapted treatment should be used and besides chemotherapy, surveillance, radiotherapy and sometimes retroperitoneal lymph node dissection can be considered. In early stages it is important to reduce immediate adjuvant treatment in as many patients as possible to avoid acute and late toxicities. In advanced stages randomized trials have to clarify if there could be a better outcome with adding new agents or with high-dose chemotherapy for patients with "poor prognosis" and adverse features or patients with a chemoresistant relapse.

The management of stage I nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumors

Testicular germ cell tumors represent the most common malignancies in young males; 70% of patients with seminomas and 50% of those with nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT) have clinical stage I at diagnosis. Lymphovascular invasion, embryonal-cell carcinoma component, absence of yolk sac histology and MIB1 proliferation rate represent predictors of micrometastatic diseasein stage I NSGCT. Therapeutic options following orchiectomy in patients with stage I NSGCT comprise nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, surveillance or adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy. All available treatment modalities produce excellent results, with a long-term survival of almost 100%. Consequently, therapy-induced toxicity is an important concern in the management of these patients. An individually tailored approach that takes into account the prognostic factor profile as well as the patient's preferences and their ability to comply with each one of the modalities is the key to the management of stage I testicular cancer.

Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in testicular cancer

With long-term survival in excess of 90% across all stages, testicular cancer has come to represent the model for successful multidisciplinary cancer care. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) remains an integral component of testis cancer management strategies for both early- and advanced-stage disease. Commensurate with improvements made in clinical staging and in our understanding of the natural history of testis cancer, lymphatic spread, and neuroanatomy, considerable modifications in the technique and template of RPLND have taken place. The morbidity of primary RPLND and postchemotherapy RPLND is low when performed by experienced surgeons. This article reviews the evolution, role, and technique of RPLND in contemporary practice.

Management of Stage I Testis Cancer

OBJECTIVE

Over the last 5 years the management of stage I testis cancer has changed tremendously. This review focuses on the latest changes in diagnostics and treatment of clinical stage I non-seminomatous and seminomatous germ cell tumors.

METHODS

A non-structured literature search (MEDLINE) was performed, including recently published papers (up to March 2006) on the subject.

RESULTS

Organ-sparing surgery has become an accepted approach to treat malignant and nonmalignant tumours in a solitary testis. With certain precautions and adjuvant radiotherapy, this approach has proven to be as effective as orchidectomy. Prognostic factors strongly influence the decision for or against adjuvant treatment in seminoma and non-seminoma. With the help of a risk-adapted approach, about 50% of patients with clinical stage I testis cancer will favour close surveillance instead of immediate adjuvant treatment. Several well-conducted trials have helped to substantiate the management. Surgical staging by retroperitoneal lymph node dissection became an exception. Patients with non-seminoma with high risk for occult metastatic disease will favour adjuvant chemotherapy and in patients with seminoma radiotherapy with reduced dosage will be challenged by carboplatin monotherapy.

CONCLUSION

With adequate diagnostics and treatment, 100% of patients with stage I testis cancer will survive. Future research will focus on quality control, adherence to guideline recommendations, and further reduction of treatment to diminish the risk of late sequalae for patients with adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy.

Germ cell tumors of the testis

Testicular cancer is the most common malignancy in men aged 20 to 35 years and accounts for approximately 1% of all male malignancies. Through the appropriate utilization of clinical trials, effective treatment paradigms have been developed for the management of all stages of testicular cancer. The multidisciplinary approach to the management of germ cell tumors of the testis has resulted in survival rates of > 90% overall. This review summarizes the principal management of germ cell tumors of the testis, highlighting the indications for surgery, controversies surrounding the integration of surgery, and alternative management strategies.

Modeling the Cost of Management Options for Stage I Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumors: A Decision Tree Analysis

Purpose

Patients with clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCTs) have been managed with surveillance, chemotherapy, or retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (RPLND) with similar survival outcomes. Cost factors influencing the choice of therapy were evaluated using computer-based decision analysis.

Methods

A detailed model was developed that integrates projected costs for more than 60 possible treatment outcomes. It incorporates primary, adjuvant, and salvage chemotherapy, primary and postchemotherapy RPLND, and both laparoscopic and open surgical approaches. Starting values and probabilities were derived from a comprehensive meta-analysis of the last 25 years of testes cancer literature. Hypothesis testing was performed using sensitivity analysis.

Results

The model predicts a cost premium for both primary chemotherapy (18.7%) and RPLND (51.7%) compared with surveillance. If laparoscopic RPLND was practiced, the cost premium for primary surgery (29.1%) approached that of chemotherapy (26.4%). Open RPLND was 1.25× as costly as laparoscopic RPLND, primarily because of longer hospitalization. The choice of open RPLND yielded a 6.9% cost premium for a surveillance program in this model. For such a program, primary chemotherapy became cost advantageous when the probability of recurrence during surveillance was more than 46%.

Conclusion

This model allows a variety of treatment cost hypotheses to be tested. Primary RPLND is never cost advantageous over surveillance or primary chemotherapy. Surgical costs can significantly increase the overall cost of a surveillance program. In stage I patients with high-risk tumor characteristics, primary chemotherapy may have a cost advantage over surveillance.

Long-term follow-up of Anglian Germ Cell Cancer Group surveillance versus patients with Stage 1 nonseminoma treated with adjuvant chemotherapy

OBJECTIVES

To study survival and late events after adjuvant chemotherapy in Stage 1 nonseminoma.

METHODS

From 1978 to 1986, all patients had surveillance. From 1986, adjuvant chemotherapy (initially a 3-day regimen of etoposide, bleomycin, and cisplatin, but, more recently, bleomycin, Oncovin, and cisplatin) was offered to patients at a high risk of relapse (greater than 30%).

RESULTS

A total of 382 patients with Stage 1 nonseminoma treated between 1978 and 2000 were reviewed. Of the 234 patients treated by surveillance, 71 (30%) had relapses (5 after 2 years), 6 died (2.6%) of germ cell cancer, and 3 developed second primary testicular cancer. Of the 148 men treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, 6 (4%) had relapses and 2 (1.4%) died of chemoresistant cancer. After one course of etoposide, bleomycin, and cisplatin, 3 (6.5%) of 46 developed a relapse; after two courses, 1 (3.6%) of 28 did so; and after bleomycin, Oncovin, and cisplatin every 10 days x2, 2 (2.7%) of 74 patients did so. Of the high-risk patients who were offered adjuvant treatment, 24% declined. As a consequence, the relapse rate of the surveillance patients only fell from 36% to 27% after the introduction of adjuvant therapy, although for the total cohort treated in the adjuvant era, the relapse rate was 16%.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant chemotherapy is more effective than retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for reducing the relapse risk in high-risk Stage 1 nonseminoma. However, given the uncertainty about the incidence of postchemotherapy late events, surveillance and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection remain justified alternatives. With positron emission tomography and laparoscopy showing increasing promise in these cases, quality-of-life studies and greater patient involvement in treatment selection are needed.

Risk-adapted treatment for patients with clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumor of the testis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether two courses of chemotherapy after orchiectomy in patients with clinical Stage I nonseminomatous germ cell testicular tumor at high risk of relapse will spare patients additional chemotherapy or surgery.

METHODS

High-risk patients had one or more of the following: preorchiectomy alpha-fetoprotein level of 80 ng/dL or greater, 80% embryonal cell carcinoma or greater, or vessel invasion in the primary tumor. Low-risk patients had none of these factors or had 50% teratoma or more without vessel invasion. High-risk patients were offered two 21-day courses of outpatient chemotherapy consisting of carboplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin. Low-risk patients and high-risk patients not receiving chemotherapy were observed.

RESULTS

Of 99 patients, we classified 76 as high risk and 23 as low risk of relapse. All but eight of the high-risk patients received chemotherapy. No patient who underwent chemotherapy developed relapse, although 1 patient with normal biomarkers and a late-appearing mass underwent retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for mature teratoma. Two of the 23 low-risk patients had disease relapse; both successfully underwent chemotherapy. The nonhematologic toxicity was mild in patients receiving chemotherapy, and no patient required hospitalization. The median follow-up was 38 months (range 9 to 69).

CONCLUSIONS

Two courses of postorchiectomy adjuvant chemotherapy were safe and well tolerated and markedly decreased the relapse rate in high-risk patients with clinical Stage I nonseminomatous germ cell testicular tumor without additional surgery or more protracted chemotherapy. This approach may avoid potential problems with compliance and diminish the cost of scrupulous follow-up. Our results support that surveillance for carefully selected patients at a low risk of relapse is appropriate.

The role of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in the management of testicular cancer

Despite continued refinement in terms of technique and the integration of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) in the management of patients with testicular cancer, RPLND remains an essential component in the ultimate cure of these patients. The failure to eradicate all disease in the retroperitoneum exposes patients to the risk of late relapse events with potentially lethal consequences. For patients with low-stage nonseminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT), primary RPLND is an important staging tool to define subsequent treatment requirements, simplify the follow-up of patients by obviating the need for routine abdominal imaging, and limit the exposure of patients to the long-term toxicity of chemotherapy. RPLND alone is curative in up to 90% of patients with low-volume retroperitoneal disease. In the post-chemotherapy setting, the inability to reliably exclude the presence of teratoma or viable germ cell cancer in the retroperitoneum mandates that post-chemotherapy RPLND be performed for all NSGCT patients with residual masses. With improvements in surgical technique and perioperative care, RPLND is associated with minimal short- and long-term morbidity in the hands of experienced surgeons at dedicated centers. This article reviews the role of RPLND in the management of patients with NSGCT at all stages and its role in advanced seminoma.

Part I: testicular cancer--management of early disease

For patients diagnosed with early-stage testicular cancer radical orchidectomy is the primary therapeutic intervention. The major pathological types of testicular cancer are seminoma and non-seminomatous germ-cell cancer. After orchidectomy, most patients with seminoma receive adjuvant radiotherapy as standard of care, although surveillance and adjuvant chemotherapy protocols are being developed. For patients with non-seminomatous tumours there are three therapeutic options; surveillance, adjuvant chemotherapy, or retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection. These patients are classified into groups with high-risk or low-risk of recurrence by presence of vascular invasion in the surgical specimen. After orchidectomy, about 50% of patients with high-risk disease will relapse but this risk is reduced to less than 5% with adjuvant therapy. Surveillance of patients with low-risk disease is acceptable because testicular cancer is still curable if metastatic recurrence occurs. There is no consensus about the management of early non-seminomatous testicular cancer because survival is almost 100% irrespective of the initial treatment decision.

Predictors of Occult Metastasis in Clinical Stage I Nonseminoma: A Systematic Review

Purpose: Patients with clinical stage I nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumor should ideally receive adjuvant therapy only when they are at high risk for occult metastasis. We aimed to quantify the importance of predictors for occult metastasis by performing a systematic review of the relevant literature. In addition, we reviewed published multivariable models and risk-adapted treatment policies.

Patients and Methods: We identified 23 publications between 1979 and 2001, reporting a total of 2,587 patients. Twenty-nine percent of the patients (759 of 2,587 patients) had occult metastases, which was diagnosed either at retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (n = 193) or during follow-up (n = 566). Odds ratios (OR) were pooled using meta-analysis techniques.

Results: The presence of vascular invasion of the primary tumor cells had the strongest effect (OR, 5.2; 95% CI, 4.0 to 6.8). Immunohistochemical staining of the primary tumor cells with the MIB-1 monoclonal antibody showing proliferative activity was a promising predictor (OR, 4.7; 95% CI, 2.0 to 11). Intermediate effects were found for embryonal carcinoma in the primary tumor (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 2.0 to 4.4) and a high pathologic stage of the tumor (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.8 to 3.8). Size of the primary tumor and age of the patient had weaker though also statistically significant associations with occult metastasis. Until now, multivariable models often included vascular invasion and embryonal carcinoma with one or two weaker predictors. None of the published risk-adapted treatment policies included MIB-1 staining.

Conclusion: Several strong predictors for occult metastasis were identified. A risk-adapted treatment policy should be developed that incorporates all relevant predictors so that adjuvant therapy is targeted better to those with occult metastases.

Management of recurrence and follow-up strategies for patients with nonseminoma testis cancer

This review serves as an outline of the clinical features and management options for the majority of recurrence situations in NSGCTs. The combination of reliable serum tumor markers, improved imaging techniques, effective cisplatin chemotherapy regimens, and application of meticulous surgical techniques has resulted in dramatic improvements in cure rates in NSGCT. These factors have caused the incidence of recurrent NSGCT to decline substantially in the past 20 years. This rarity of recurrence in combination with the low incidence of NSGCT prevents the practicing clinician from accumulating experience in this challenging patient population. Therefore, to ensure improvement in salvage rates, patients are best managed in centers with extensive experience in NSGCT.

Management of clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ-cell testis tumors

Nonseminomatous germ-cell tumors of the testis, the most common cancer in young adult males, are highly curable. Clinical Stage I disease represents almost a third of the patients. Three treatment strategies are currently available: surveillance, postorchiectomy chemotherapy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Factors predictive of extratesticular involvement have been described, thus making it possible to tailor treatment to risk. New imaging procedures also permit staging and prediction of outcome. Decision-making is shared between the patient and his oncologist. Economic issues are better understood but should be further studied.

Testis conserving chemotherapy in germ cell cancer: its potential to increase understanding of the biology and treatment of carcinoma-in-situ

Prompted by recognition of the potential of chemotherapy to increase the success of testis conserving surgery in patients with germ cell cancer, background and outcome data are reviewed and their contribution to the ongoing debate about how germ cell cancer develops discussed. The review is based on three previous studies of: a) time trends in tumour size in 578 personal series of all stages of testis cancer treated since 1978; b) impact of chemotherapy on actuarial risk of tumours in contralateral testis examined on 1221 patients treated in trials through the Anglian Germ Cell Cancer Consortium; and c) testes conservation attempted using chemotherapy in 78 patients. Since 1978 tumour size has decreased from 4.8 to 3.0 cms while cure has gone from 77 to 97%. There was no overall long term reduction in second cancers beyond 10 years in stage 1 patients after orchidectomy alone compared to stage 1 or metastatic disease patients receiving chemotherapy though the incidence was non significantly lower up to 10 years particularly in those patients receiving etoposide based combination. Testis conservation was initially successful in 28 of 78 (36%). An additional 25 (32%) had no viable cancer in orchidectomy specimen. In the 28 primary tumours cured by chemotherapy there was a 26% late relapse rate between 5 and 10 years (all cured by orchidectomy) compared to less than 5% in those cured with established metastases. In conclusion, testis conservation with chemotherapy is safe and feasible, though relapse is too frequent for routine service use. Confirmation of the high frequency of late relapse by others has raised the question whether these recurrences are due to post pubertal events reinducing CIS in intrauterine oestrogen primed germ cells and highlights the potential of testes conservation studies to better understand germ cell cancer development.

The role of retroperitoneal surgery in testis cancer

Testis cancer is today a curable malignancy. But controversy remains about the appropriate management of patients presenting different stages. There is an increasing interest in surveillance rather than in primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) for stage I non-seminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT). Adjuvant chemotherapy has become an efficient treatment option for high risk non-seminomatous germ cell testis cancer, however, biological and histologic risk factors of the primary tumor are not yet precisely defined. To determine the appropriate management of patients with testicular cancer, postoperative morbidity after RPLND and risk of chemotherapy-induced morbidity must be balanced. Whoever reviews the literature must take into consideration that the excellent postoperative results after RPLND depend on high volume and large experience with testis cancer. As treatment morbidity and its intensity have a major impact on testis cancer patient quality of life, the choice of management must be based on the patient's social situation, his personal needs, and the doctor's experience and resources.

Fertility and sexual function following orchiectomy and 2 cycles of chemotherapy for stage I high risk nonseminomatous germ cell cancer

PURPOSE

We investigate fertility and sexual function in patients following orchiectomy and adjuvant cisplatin based chemotherapy for high risk, stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumor of the testis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1985 and 1994, 59 patients with stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumor and poor prognostic factors were treated with 2 cycles of cisplatin, vinblastine and bleomycin, or bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin after orchiectomy. At least 32 months following treatment all patients were contacted and asked to complete a questionnaire regarding fertility and sexual activity, and to volunteer for a semen and hormonal analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 59 patients 49 (83%) completed the questionnaire. Before chemotherapy 18 (37%) patients had fathered children, 6 (12%) were involuntarily childless and none had a major sexual dysfunction. After treatment 11 (22%) patients fathered children, and 5 (10%) were involuntarily childless, with 4 involuntarily childless before chemotherapy. There were no significant alterations in sexual function. Semen analysis in 27 patients was normal in 23, and revealed mild oligospermia in 2 and azoospermia in 2. In 18 patients with hormone analysis median values for luteinizing hormone and free testosterone were normal but median value for follicle-stimulating hormone was slightly increased.

CONCLUSIONS

Two cycles of cisplatin based adjuvant chemotherapy do not seem to affect adversely fertility or sexual activity.

Surveillance for stage I testicular germ cell tumours: results and cost benefit analysis of management options

Between 1979 and 1996 303 men with stage I testicular germ cell tumours (120 seminoma and 183 non-seminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCT)) were enrolled onto a programme of surveillance. In our institutions the frequency of computed tomography (CT) scans is reduced compared with other centres. For all 303 men, the median follow-up is 5.1 years (range: 0.1-21.7 years) and there have only been 3 deaths (1 from disease, 1 from neutropenic sepsis and 1 from secondary leukaemia). 52/183 (28%) patients with NSGCT and 18/120 (15%) patients with seminoma have relapsed. The relapse-free survival at 5 years is 82% for seminoma and 69% for NSGCT (Logrank P=0.004). All men who relapsed, except 1 man with NSGCT, were in the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group good or intermediate prognosis group at relapse. Half of the seminoma relapses presented with symptoms and 31% of the NSGCT relapses. The remaining relapses were detected serologically or radiologically by the surveillance programme. 5 men (2%) on surveillance, 3 with initial diagnosis of seminoma and 2 with NSGCT, have developed second contralateral testis tumours (all stage I seminomas). In a well motivated centre a policy of surveillance for stage I testicular germ cell tumours (both NSGCT and seminoma) is associated with a low mortality rate (3/303, 1%) and may have the advantage of sparing overtreatment with potentially toxic therapies in this group of young men.

Surgery versus surveillance in stage I non-seminoma testicular cancer

Today, the standard treatment for patients with clinical Stage I non-seminomatous testicular germ cell tumors (NSTGCT) following orchidectomy is either primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) or close surveillance with cisplatin-based polychemotherapy in case of a relapse. Both treatment modalities provide excellent overall survival rates up to 100%. Consequently, selection of the most appropriate management option is not primarily guided by survival considerations. The choice between the available options, each having its merits and its drawbacks, should be made based on a number of factors including treatment-related morbidity, views and expertise of the physician, patient preferences, the expected degree of patient compliance, and prognostic factor analysis. To date, the role of adjuvant chemotherapy as an alternative management option for patients with clinical Stage I NSTGCT at high risk of occult metastases is limited. This systemic treatment modality would be a realistic alternative if the reliability of prognostic factors to identify high-risk Stage I patients could be improved. This review addresses relevant issues in the management of patients with clinical Stage I NSTGCT to provide information that will allow a rational selection of the most appropriate management option.

Primary cervical malignant teratoma with a rib metastasis in an adult: five-year survival after surgery and chemotherapy. A case report with a review of the literature

We report a case of a man presenting with a cervical malignant teratoma and a chondrosarcomatous rib metastasis. He was alive and free of recurrence five years and 10 months (= 70 months) after resection of the primary mass, followed by chemotherapy and subsequent resection of the rib tumor. This is the 35th patient reported in the literature and the first description in which an 'adjuvant' or primary chemotherapy was used. Previous patients with a cervical malignant teratoma, reported after lethal outcome, had survivals of one to 22 months (median nine months). In all patients with a preoperative clinical impression of an aggressive, differentiated or undifferentiated malignancy, the definite diagnosis of teratoma could only be made histologically. By analogy to germ cell tumors, the prognosis of malignant teratoma might be improved if complete excision is combined with new, adjuvant chemotherapy protocols for germ cell tumors. Lessons learned from this case are placed in the context of germ cell tumors in general and of non-gonadal malignant teratomas in particular.

The management of stage I testis cancer

For clinical stage I seminoma, conventional management consists of adjuvant RT after orchiectomy. Only 5% of patients relapse. The majority can be salvaged by chemotherapy. The overall survival of 98% is excellent. Seminoma is radiosensitive. A lower dose of RT is required than for NSGCT. Standard therapy presently is 30 Gy in 3 weeks, as suggested by the MRC study. RT is generally well tolerated. There have been recent concerns about second malignancies after 10 to 15 years. Surveillance studies have shown that 18% of patients relapse, the majority in para-aortic lymph nodes. About 15% require salvage RT and 5% salvage chemotherapy. Second relapses are seen in patients treated with RT at first relapse, and occur outside of the radiation field. The main advantage of surveillance is that 80% of patients can be spared slightly toxic overtreatment. The main disadvantage is the need for long-term follow-up, which is expensive and stressful to the patient. Good patient compliance, mandatory to an observation policy, is often difficult on a long-term basis. Seminoma is clearly responsive to chemotherapy. Adjuvant carboplatin in clinical stage I has only been evaluated in two studies. Because reliable prognostic factors have not been established, a high-risk group cannot be identified, and chemotherapy must be given to all patients. Whether or not one cycle of chemotherapy is sufficient requires further confirmation, particularly in view of the results with carboplatin as compared with cisplatin in patients with advanced NSGCT. Results of the randomized MRC trial comparing RT with carboplatin are of interest.

Stage II nonseminomatous testis cancer: the roles of primary and adjuvant chemotherapy

Historically, a retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) has been the primary treatment of stage II nonseminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT) patients, whereas chemotherapy has been used in the adjuvant setting. Increasing evidence of the efficacy of chemotherapy has led to additional treatment possibilities for stage II patients. Both chemotherapy and RPLND have a role in the primary therapy of stage II NSGCT, and both modalities can be used as secondary adjunctive therapy. Management of these patients now requires a renewed emphasis on risk stratification and on the integration of patient preferences into the management algorithm.

Testicular cancer

The following article provides a comprehensive review of male germ cell tumors; the pathology and the clinical manifestations of the tumors are discussed, as are the modern concepts of clinical staging. Patients with bulky stage II and stage III non-seminomatous germ cell tumors are treated with chemotherapy. The new international classification system has provided a very useful way to categorize these patients by prognosis. Patients with good- or intermediate-risk tumors may be treated with 3 courses of cisplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin (BEP) or 4 courses of etoposide and cisplatin (EP), and more than 90% of these patients will survive. Randomized trials have shown that, if only 3 courses of chemotherapy are to be given, the substitution of carboplatin for cisplatin and the omission of bleomycin are deleterious to outcome. Patients who still have a significant residual mass and normal markers after treatment should undergo a surgical resection of the residual tumor. Patients who are classified by the international classification system as having poor-risk tumors have about a 50% likelihood of survival, and many of these patients will require surgical resection of a residual tumor after chemotherapy. No randomized trial has proved a regimen to be superior to that of 4 courses of BEP. Currently, an ongoing trial is evaluating the effect of the early use of high-dose therapy in combination with hematopoietic rescue in patients with these types of tumors. Patients with small-volume stage II tumors are generally treated with retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND). About 25% of the patients selected for this procedure will actually have pathologically negative nodes. Those with positive nodes may elect to receive adjuvant chemotherapy (2 courses of BEP), which will almost always prevent relapse. An alternate approach for patients willing to comply with monthly follow-up is surveillance, with chemotherapy deferred until relapse is noted. About 50% of these patients will be cured with surgery (as many as 75% have microscopic disease only). With careful follow-up, those destined to relapse can be treated promptly and at a time when they have small-volume tumors and an excellent prognosis if they go on to receive chemotherapy. Patients with clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors may also undergo RPLND, although an acceptable alternative for these patients is surveillance. The advantages and the disadvantages of each approach are discussed. The overall risk of recurrence is about 30%, but there have been patient groups defined that may vary in risk from 10% to 15% up to 50% or more. Patients with advanced seminoma are treated with chemotherapy. When this procedure is used, outcomes are favorable and all patients are either in good- or intermediate-risk groups, according to the international classification system. Patients with small-volume stage II tumors are treated with radiotherapy. Radiation is also generally used for the treatment of clinical stage I patients, although surveillance is growing in prominence as a means to treat these patients. Late effects of treatment are also discussed in this article. Ejaculatory function can be preserved in most patients who have early stage tumors and who undergo RPLND and in some patients who undergo surgery after chemotherapy. The most troubling effect of chemotherapy is the development of etoposide-induced leukemia, a unique--and fortunately rare--clinical entity.

Treatment of clinical stage I testicular cancer and a possible role for new biological prognostic parameters

Three different treatment strategies for patients with stage I non-seminomatous testicular cancer are available that will all result in long-term survival in more than 98% of the patients: a "wait and see" strategy with follow-up and chemotherapy in cases of tumour progression, retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy, with or without application of systemic chemotherapy, in cases of retroperitoneal metastases (pathological stage II disease) or primary adjuvant chemotherapy following inguinal orchiectomy. Each treatment strategy is associated with specific side-effects. In several studies histological characteristics of the primary tumour, particularly the presence of vascular invasion and of embryonal carcinoma cells, have been demonstrated to be significant prognostic factors for the risk of occult retroperitoneal metastases in patients with stage I disease. In addition, new biological prognostic factors determined by flow cytometry, cytogenetic analysis or molecular-biological DNA or RNA analysis have been investigated, among which alterations of the p53 tumour-suppressor gene may represent a promising new prognostic factor. Although alterations of p53 gene expression seem to be associated with advanced tumour stage and may predict retroperitoneal metastatic disease, the independent role of these molecular genetic alterations needs to be prospectively studied. Currently a risk-adapted treatment strategy based on the histological criteria of vascular invasion and the presence of embryonal carcinoma can be used to stratify patients into a "high-" and "low-risk" group with respect to tumour progression. While primary-nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy or adjuvant chemotherapy with two cycles of platinum, etoposide and bleomycin may be appropriate for patients with a high risk (above 40%) for tumour progression, a "wait-and-see" strategy can be used for "low-risk" (less than 15% risk of progression) patients. Molecular investigations of prognostic factors may be able to improve further the stratification of patients into these different risk categories.

Results of treatment in testicular nonseminoma

Seventy-one testicular nonseminomatous germ cell tumours were treated in the Helsinki University Central Hospital between 1980 and 1990. Thirty-five (49%) were stage I, 16 (23%) stage II and 20 (28%) stage III tumours. The 5-year survival rates were 91%, 94% and 70%, respectively. Five of the eight patients relapsing in stage I had adverse histopathological risk factors in their tumours. In the retrospective evaluation two stage I patients had actually a higher stage. The good results in stage II were achieved with a routine combination of chemotherapy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. All five patients lost for stage III nonseminoma had risk factors for unfavourable prognosis: liver metastases or very high serum markers at diagnosis. The results presented here are considerably better than in the 1970s in this country and well comparable to results from countries where this malignancy is more common. Still some patients were lost. Co-operation in different fields of medicine is essential to find and treat optimally those with more aggressive disease and those who are cured with less strenuous treatment modalities.