Risk factors for male partner antisperm antibodies

Testicular Torsion Appearance and Diagnosis on Computed Tomography of the Abdomen/Pelvis: Case Report

Introduction: Testicular torsion, or the twisting of the spermatic cord compromising blood flow to the testis, is a urologic emergency with the potential to cause infertility in male patients. The diagnosis may be clinical or confirmed using imaging, with ultrasound being the modality of choice. Case Report: We present a case of right lower quadrant pain with radiation to the groin and right scrotum in a young male. A computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis was ordered to assess for appendicitis, which showed a “whirl” sign on the inferior periphery of the images near the scrotum. The finding was not appreciated during the emergency department visit and the patient was discharged home. He returned 48 hours later due to continued pain and was ultimately diagnosed with testicular torsion via ultrasound and surgical pathology. Conclusion: This is the first reported case to our knowledge identifying “whirl” sign for the diagnosis of testicular torsion. This finding was not appreciated by multiple clinicians during the initial patient presentation, highlighting the uncommon nature of the finding.

Varicoceles in the pediatric population: Diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes

Varicocele is commonly encountered in adolescents. There are still many controversies regarding pathophysiology, health effects, clinical significance, and optimum treatment of this condition. This article reviews the current evidence pertaining to children and adolescents with varicocele. This group present a unique and somehow challenging situation, since they are still going through pubertal changes that may confound the effects of the disease and its treatment on the developing testes.

Seminal biomarkers for the evaluation of male infertility

For men struggling to conceive with their partners, diagnostic tools are limited and often consist of only a standard semen analysis. This baseline test serves as a crude estimation of male fertility, leaving patients and clinicians in need of additional diagnostic biomarkers. Seminal fluid contains the highest concentration of molecules from the male reproductive glands, therefore, this review focuses on current and novel seminal biomarkers in certain male infertility scenarios, including natural fertility, differentiating azoospermia etiologies, and predicting assisted reproductive technique success. Currently available tests include antisperm antibody assays, DNA fragmentation index, sperm fluorescence in situ hybridization, and other historical sperm functional tests. The poor diagnostic ability of current assays has led to continued efforts to find more predictive biomarkers. Emerging research in the fields of genomics, epigenetics, proteomics, transcriptomics, and metabolomics holds promise for the development of novel male infertility biomarkers. Seminal protein-based assays of TEX101, ECM1, and ACRV1 are already available or under final development for clinical use. Additional panels of DNA, RNA, proteins, or metabolites are being explored as we attempt to understand the pathophysiologic processes of male infertility. Future ventures will need to continue data integration and validation for the development of clinically useful infertility biomarkers to aid in male infertility diagnosis, treatment, and counseling.

Semen analysis and sperm function tests: How much to test?

Semen analysis as an integral part of infertility investigations is taken as a surrogate measure for male fecundity in clinical andrology, male fertility, and pregnancy risk assessments. Clearly, laboratory seminology is still very much in its infancy. In as much as the creation of a conventional semen profile will always represent the foundations of male fertility evaluation, the 5th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) manual is a definitive statement on how such assessments should be carried out and how the quality should be controlled. A major advance in this new edition of the WHO manual, resolving the most salient critique of previous editions, is the development of the first well-defined reference ranges for semen analysis based on the analysis of over 1900 recent fathers. The methodology used in the assessment of the usual variables in semen analysis is described, as are many of the less common, but very valuable, sperm function tests. Sperm function testing is used to determine if the sperm have the biologic capacity to perform the tasks necessary to reach and fertilize ova and ultimately result in live births. A variety of tests are available to evaluate different aspects of these functions. To accurately use these functional assays, the clinician must understand what the tests measure, what the indications are for the assays, and how to interpret the results to direct further testing or patient management.

Antisperm antibodies in infertile men and their correlation with seminal parameters

Aim:  Antisperm antibodies (ASA) in males cause the autoimmune disease 'immune infertility'. The present study intended to detect the presence of ASA and their incidence in men with unexplained infertility, as well as to evaluate the correlation between the presence of ASA and semen parameter alterations. Methods:  Blood and sperm assessment were collected to carry out a direct and indirect mixed antiglobulin reaction (MAR) test and semen analysis in infertile and fertile men from the University Hospital of the Faculty of Medicine, Sao Paulo State University, Sao Paulo. Results:  In the MAR test, 18.18% of infertile men were positive for ASA. In fertile men, no positivity was found. A significant correlation between the presence of ASA with an increased white blood cell count plus a decreased hypoosmotic swelling test result was observed. Conclusions:  The results indicate that ASA are involved in reduced fertility. It is not ASA detection per se that provides conclusive information about the occurrence of damage to fertility. The correlation between infertility and altered seminal parameters reinforce the ASA participation in this pathology. (Reprod Med Biol 2007; 6: 33-38).

Seminal Factor VIII and von Willebrand Factor: a possible role of the conventional clotting system in human semen?

Factor (F) VIII circulates in blood complexed with von Willebrand Factor (vWF). Deficiency or defect accounts for haemophilia A and vWF disease. In blood, FVIII functions as a co-factor for FIXa in the activation of FX. Human semen coagulates and liquefies in a process that resembles and has some links with the conventional haemostatic process. A study elsewhere has detected traces, but not measurable levels, of FVIII coagulant activity (FVIII:C). In the present study we have assessed FVIII antigen (FVIII:Ag), FVIII:C and vWF antigen (vWF:Ag) levels in 159 semen specimens obtained from sub-fertile (n = 21), normally fertile (n = 38), fertile donors (n = 32), and vasectomized men (n = 57). Seminal FVIII:Ag levels were also measured in a group defined by several parameters derived from the World Health Organization (WHO) fertility criteria, termed "pooled normal semen parameters" (PNSP). Factor VIII:Ag levels were compared with conventional fertility parameters. In addition, both FVIII:C and vWF:Ag were assessed in a separate group of normal individuals (n = 11). Factor VIII:Ag, FVIII:C and vWF were present and quantifiable in human semen. Factor VIII:Ag levels were significantly lower in vasectomy subjects compared with donors (p = 0.01) or PNSP group (p = 0.01). Several trends taken together suggest an associations between FVIII:Ag and semen quality. Parallel investigations demonstrate FV, FVII, FVIIa, FIX, FIXa, FXa, FXI, FXII, tissue factor (TF) and tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) in semen. The present report therefore provides further evidence for the presence of a functioning clotting system in human semen.

Localization of binding sites of naturally occurring antisperm antibodies on human spermatozoa by immunofluorescence

Antisperm antibodies (ASA) may affect sperm motility, acrosome reaction, sperm penetration of cervical mucus, binding to the zona pellucida, and sperm-egg fusion. We investigated the localization of ASA of infertile men or men after vasectomy bound on the sperm surface using an immunofluorescence method. Binding occurred in the acrosomal region, midpiece, and tail. Most of the ASA in both groups of patients bound to the midpiece alone or in combination with other regions of spermatozoa. Only few ASA samples showed binding to all the three sperm regions. A combination of binding to the acrosomal region and to the midpiece was never observed. In infertile patients with ASA, the binding site was compared with sperm parameters. ASA binding to the sperm head influenced the acrosome reaction. Binding of ASA on tail and/or midpiece was not associated with a significant alteration of viability and motility. Immunofluorescence appears to be a valuable tool in the diagnosis of immune infertility, in particular when impairment of the acrosome activity is suggested.

Male factor infertility: evaluation and management

There is a male factor involved in up to half of all infertile couples. Potential etiologies in male factor infertility are many and require thorough evaluation for their accurate identification. A complete medical history in conjunction with a focused examination can allow for an appropriate choice of laboratory and imaging studies. The semen analysis is a crucial first step, but by no means is it sufficient to determine a specific etiology or dictate therapy. A systematic approach is necessary to help guide the work-up and rule out less likely causes. The etiologies discussed within this article are tremendously broad, and the prognosis for any given couple depends, in large part, on the etiology. Without a firm understanding of the genetics, anatomy, physiology, and complex interplay of the male reproductive system, the evaluation becomes an inefficient exercise that often fails to define the precise etiology. Couples with male factor infertility need a systematic approach with the efficiency of ultimate treatment determined largely by the physician's ability to identify the specific cause of the man's reproductive failure.

Semen quality and intrauterine insemination

There is good evidence in literature that intrauterine insemination (IUI) is the best first line treatment and most cost-effective procedure for moderate male factor subfertility. It seems very difficult to identify individual semen parameters predicting the likelihood of pregnancy after IUI. This can be explained by a lack of standardization of semen analysis, but many other methodological variables may also influence IUI success rates such as the patient selection, type of ovarian stimulation and number of inseminations per cycle. A review of the literature confirmed that sperm morphology using strict criteria and the inseminating motile sperm count (IMC) after sperm preparation are the two most important sperm parameters to assess the real impact of semen quality on IUI outcome. A universal threshold level above which IUI can be performed with acceptable pregnancy rates has not been determined yet, although IUI success seems to be impaired with <5% normal spermatozoa and an IMC of <1 x 10(6). Until now, no method of sperm preparation has been shown to be superior with regard to pregnancy rate after IUI. Whether supplementation of culture media with substances such as antioxidants and platelet activating factor may improve the results remains the subject of further research.

Multivariant analysis of men from infertile couples with and without antisperm antibodies

PROBLEM

Research studies in animal and human systems have demonstrated conclusively that antisperm antibodies can interfere with fertilization. In the male, autoantibodies to sperm can be detected both in the sera and seminal plasma.

METHOD OF STUDY

Ninety-seven men who were tested for antisperm antibodies as a part of an infertility evaluation were identified. Complete medical history was obtained, including information related to events suspected of being associated with antisperm antibodies. History of surgery (varicocele repair, hernia repair, and vas reversal) and infection (epididymitis, sexually transmitted disease, and orchitis) were compared with semen parameters (motility less than 60%, concentration less than 20 x 10(6), and volume less than 2 cc). These were compared to antisperm antibody results of mixed agglutination reaction (MAR) and direct immunobead binding test (IBT) for immunoglobulin G (IgG). Statistical analysis was performed using Fishers exact two-tailed test.

RESULTS

As expected, prior vas reversal was significantly associated with the presence of antisperm antibodies (P = 0.0002) by MAR or IBT with a fivefold increased relative risk (95% confidence interval, 1.97-12.38). Other surgeries manipulating the cord structures independent of vas reversal were not associated with antisperm antibodies (P = 0.09). Prior infections, independent of vas reversal, were significantly associated with antisperm antibodies by MAR (P = 0.04) with a 3.8-fold increased relative risk (95% confidence interval, 1.06-13.87) but not by IBT. Sperm concentration less than 20 x 10(6), motility less than 60%, and a volume less than 2 cc were not associated with antisperm antibodies by MAR or IBT.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that manipulation of the cord structures excluding the vas were not associated with antisperm antibodies; however, vas reversal and prior infection are significant risk factors for the development of antisperm antibodies.

Relationship between etiological factors and total motile sperm count in 350 infertile patients

The prevalence of different etiologic factors has been evaluated in 350 male patients consulting the same physician in an urban, ambulatory setting for primary or secondary infertility of more than 1 year. Environmental factors such as alcohol or drugs represented 12% of the etiologies, acquired diseases such as varicocele and prostatitis 40%, congenital diseases and primary testicular failure 16.2%, idiopathic cases 19.4%, and abnormality of sperm transport 7.4%. The severity of sperm alterations in the different etiologic categories was evaluated by the total motile sperm count per ejaculate (TMS) (normal > 16). The TMS was less than 5 in classical causes of male infertility such as testicular failure, endocrinopathy, cancer, or antisperm antibodies. It was more than 10 in controversial causes of infertility such as varicocele, prostatis, chlamydial infections, and professional exposure to heat. After treatment, there was a nonsignificant increase of the TMS in the latter cases. In cases of azoospermia of pituitary origin, the TMS was normalized by a hormonal treatment. In some cases of azoospermia of possible obstructive origin, sperm appeared in the ejaculate after diclofenac treatment. The utility of andrological investigation and treatment is discussed.

Characteristics of men and women with circulating antisperm antibodies in a combined infertility clinic in Kuwait

Antisperm antibodies were determined in the sera of 250 infertile couples and 100 puerperal women as controls using the immunofluorescence technique. Couples with significant circulating antisperm antibodies were placed on low-dose prednisolone 5 mg daily for 3-6 months. Initial routine semen analysis and hypoosmotic swelling test were done and repeated after 3 months of therapy. The incidence of antisperm antibodies (ASA) was 18.8 and 17.6% in the men and women, respectively, compared to 4% in the women controls (p < .02). In the men, the main determinants (with incidence) of ASA included smoking (33.9%), past history of sexually transmitted disease (33.3%), surgery to genital tract (28.6%), trauma (27.3%), and unexplained infertility (18.5%). In women whose husbands had antisperm antibodies the incidence of circulating antisperm antibodies was 38.3%, while endometriosis and thyroid dysfunction had incidence of antisperm antibodies of 21.4 and 16.7%, respectively. In the 27 (10.8%) case of unexplained infertility, the incidence of antisperm antibodies was 22.2%. High follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) in the men and low midluteal-phase progesterone in the women were associated with increased expression of antisperm antibodies. Antisperm antibodies adversely affected quality of sperm. Low-dose prednisolone significantly reduced the titer of antisperm antibodies and improved the sperm parameters and conception rate.

Clinical and biological aspects of male immune infertility: a case-controlled study of 86 cases

A case-control study of clinical, endocrine and seminal characteristics in 86 infertile men and a prospective study of conception rates during 804 follow-up cycles among 75 infertile couples with male immune infertility were performed. Genito-urethral infections or surgery, and palpable epididymal abnormalities were more common among the immunological cases than among the non-immunological infertile controls (n = 180), but sperm concentration, motility and morphology were similar. The spontaneous conception rate in 70 cases was 1.7% per cycle. Treatment by intra-uterine insemination (IUI) resulted in 8.6% pregnancies per cycle, conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) had a 18.4% success rate per attempt, and two out of three couples treated by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) attained pregnancy. Minimal sperm quality required for successful IUI was not lower than that recorded in couples with spontaneous conception. It is concluded that immunological infertility, as diagnosed by a positive mixed antiglobulin reaction (MAR) test, is associated with a low spontaneous conception rate. Techniques of assisted reproduction are useful in the management of couples with infertility resulting from this pathology, but sperm characteristics required for successful IUI are much higher than those needed for successful IVF. A strategy for the logical management of this pathology is proposed.

Infertility due to antisperm antibodies

Immunoinfertility is an important problem, involving a significant number of infertile couples. Although the presence of antibodies on sperm has better prognostic value than those in serum or seminal plasma, it may not be the sole authentic evidence of immunoinfertility. Infertility from antisperm antibodies is likely only when they bind to a relevant sperm antigen involved in a specific fertility function. The variance in functional deficits seen in immunologic infertility is most likely related to antibodies directed at different sperm antigens or different class, subclass, or isotypes. Antibodies to FA-1 seem to be of significant importance in human immunoinfertility. In approaching couples with infertility, a high index of suspicion for antibodies is necessary to avoid misdiagnosis. In the optimal situation, all semen analyses should be screened for sperm-bound antibodies, but if this is impractical, testing should be performed on high-risk individuals (Table I). In couples in which the man has sperm-bound antibodies, and in whom there is no identifiable female factor, treatment should be instituted. Most treatments for immunoinfertility have been disappointing because of poor results, adverse effects, or high cost. Corticosteroid therapy has shown some promise in published reports (mostly poorly designed studies), but increase in pregnancy rate is modest and adverse effects may be significant. In our opinion, informed consent should be documented prior to institution of corticosteroid therapy, and subjects should be closely monitored. Advanced reproductive technologies offer a higher safety profile, and, with increasing technology, higher pregnancy rates. We recommend progressing from "low-tech" procedures, such as IUI and reserving the higher level procedures, such as IVF and ICSI, for those couples in whom pregnancy does not occur. The highest level reproductive technologies give the best current prospects for pregnancy in patients with this difficult problem but also are invasive and costly. It is hoped that further work in the laboratory will give rise to newer, safer, and less expensive effective treatments in the very near future.

Detection of antibodies toward epididymal sperm antigens--an obligatory step in evaluation of human immunologic infertility?

PROBLEM

To test the relative impact of epididymal versus ejaculated sperm in immunologic infertility.

METHOD

Human antibody binding to epididymal and ejaculated spermatozoa was compared by flow cytometry (FCM) since it allows quantitative analysis of viable sperm while ignoring nonsperm cells. To select sera for FCM, GAT, TAT, and ELISA were applied on 145 sera from fertile men, idiopathically infertile and varicocele patients.

RESULTS

All GAT/TAT-positive infertile patients, a representative group of varicocele patients and the fertile control, were assessed by FCM. Higher reactivity toward epididymal sperm revealed 18/22 sera while only four out of them bound to ejaculated sperm stronger than the control. All varicocele sera were positive against epididymal while negative against ejaculated spermatozoa.

CONCLUSIONS

Epididymal sperm antigens may play a predominant role in some cases of immunologic infertility. Such patients might not be adequately diagnosed and respectively treated due to the limitations of diagnostic procedures applying only ejaculated spermatozoa.

Segmental infarction of the testicle: atypical presentation of a testicular mass

Segmental infarction of the testis represents a rare entity. To our knowledge 11 cases have been reported in the literature. We report 4 additional cases of segmental testicular infarction masquerading as testis tumors. Inability to distinguish these benign lesions from malignant testis tumors resulted in orchiectomy in all 4 cases.

Varicocele-related infertility is not associated with increased sperm-bound antibody

Immunological factors have been implicated as a cause of unexplained infertility. Previous studies have demonstrated increased levels of sperm-bound antibody in infertile men with varicoceles and have postulated their role in varicocele-related infertility. However, these studies were performed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. We evaluated retrospectively 111 male patients referred for infertility using a direct immunobead assay. Of the patients 29 had grade II or III varicoceles (that is palpable or easily visualized) and 82 were without varicocele. Four patients who had undergone vasovasostomy were included as controls for the assay. A direct immunobead assay was performed for isotype IgG and IgA sperm-bound antibody using a standard protocol. A computerized semen analysis was also performed. Greater than 20% binding, excluding tail tip activity, was considered significant. Of 29 patients with and 82 without a varicocele significant binding was identified in 5 (17%) and 9 (11%), respectively. Chi-square statistical analysis did not reveal this difference to be significant (p < 0.05). All 4 vasovasostomy patients demonstrated significant binding. We conclude from this study that infertile men with varicoceles do not demonstrate significantly increased levels of sperm-bound antibody compared to infertile controls and, therefore, sperm-bound antibody does not appear to have a significant role in varicocele-related infertility.