Predictive value of contralateral biopsies in unilaterally palpable prostate cancer

Contemporary radical prostatectomy

Purpose. Patients diagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer have more surgical treatment options than in the past. This paper focuses on the procedures' oncological or functional outcomes and perioperative morbidities of radical retropubic prostatectomy, radical perineal prostatectomy, and robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Materials and Methods. A MEDLINE/PubMed search of the literature on radical prostatectomy and other new management options was performed. Results. Compared to the open procedures, robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy has no confirmed significant difference in most literatures besides less blood loss and blood transfusion. Nerve sparing is a safe means of preserving potency on well-selected patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Positive surgical margin rates of radical prostatectomy affect the recurrence and survival of prostate cancer. The urinary and sexual function outcomes have been vastly improved. Neoadjuvant treatment only affects the rate of positive surgical margin. Adjuvant therapy can delay and reduce the risk of recurrence and improve the survival of the high risk prostate cancer. Conclusions. For the majority of patients with organ-confined prostate cancer, radical prostatectomy remains a most effective approach. Radical perineal prostatectomy remains a viable approach for patients with morbid obesity, prior pelvic surgery, or prior pelvic radiation. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) has become popular among surgeons but has not yet become the firmly established standard of care. Long-term data have confirmed the efficacy of radical retropubic prostatectomy with disease control rates and cancer-specific survival rates.

Tumor focality in prostate cancer: implications for focal therapy

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in focal treatment for prostate cancer. Although widely used for the treatment of tumors of the breast and kidney, focal treatment for prostate cancer remains a controversial area. Criticism of focal prostate therapy has been based on the fact that prostate cancer is a multifocal disease. Until now, little attention has been paid to distinguishing between men with unifocal and those with multifocal disease because such information has little clinical relevance when treatment is aimed at the whole gland irrespective of the volume or number of cancers in the prostate. In this Review, we summarize existing knowledge and examine the issue of prostate cancer focality in the context of focal treatment.

Can prostate biopsies predict suitability for nerve‐sparing radical prostatectomy?

OBJECTIVE

The process for selecting patients suitable for nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (NSRP) has been the source of much debate. In this study we analysed the use of prostate biopsies as the principal selection tool.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy (n = 133) were retrospectively categorized as having "unilateral" (biopsy demonstrated malignancy confined to one side of the gland) or "bilateral" carcinoma. The accuracy and reliability of this categorization were determined by correlation with the final histopathology of the resected radical prostatectomy specimen.

RESULTS

Prostate biopsy suggested "unilateral" carcinoma in 30/58 (52%) and 45/75 (60%) patients diagnosed using transrectal ultrasound-guided (TRUS) and transperineal digital-guided (TP) routes, respectively. Subsequent analysis of the resected specimen, however, revealed "bilateral" malignancy in 50 patients (86%) in the TRUS group and in 63 (84%) in the TP group. Furthermore, positive surgical margins were identified on the "benign" side (by preoperative biopsy) in 6 (20%) patients in the TRUS subgroup whose biopsy had suggested "unilateral" carcinoma, and in 12 (27%) of the comparative TP subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

Biopsy-suggested "unilateral" carcinoma was associated with both a high incidence of "bilateral" disease on final histology following radical prostatectomy and an alarming incidence (24%) of positive surgical margins on the "benign" side where NSRP might be advocated.

Does laterality of positive needle biopsy in clinical T2a patients with prostate cancer affect biochemical recurrence-free survival?

OBJECTIVES

To test whether patients with clinical Stage T2a prostate cancer with biopsy-proven disease only contralateral to the palpable abnormality experience outcomes similar to those of patients with clinical Stage T1c.

METHODS

We identified 1567 patients who had undergone radical prostatectomy at our institution from 1995 to 2007 with a prostate-specific antigen level of less than 10 ng/mL and complete information regarding the laterality of positive biopsy cores. Of these patients, 1157 had clinical Stage T1c and 410 Stage cT2a. The patients with clinical Stage T2a were divided into two groups according to the laterality of the positive biopsy cores: ipsilateral only (n = 241) and contralateral only (n = 53). Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to compare the biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) probabilities.

RESULTS

The patients with clinical Stage T2a had significantly poorer 5-year BRFS than did the patients with clinical Stage T1c (83.5% versus 94.4%, P <0.001). The difference in BRFS between the contralateral and ipsilateral clinical Stage T2a groups was statistically insignificant. A significant difference was found in BRFS between patients with cT1c and cT2a ipsilateral disease. A statistically insignificant difference in BRFS was found between patients with cT1c and cT2a contralateral disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The laterality of the needle biopsy in relation to the palpable abnormality in patients with clinical Stage T2a could affect BRFS. Our data have demonstrate an insignificant difference between patients with cT2a contralateral disease and those with contralateral cT1c disease.

Evaluation of a Contralateral Biopsy Specimen in Prostate Cancer Patients with Unilateral Suspicious Lesions

INTRODUCTION

In patients with a clinically unilateral palpable and/or visible lesion confined to the prostate on digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography, the findings of biopsy specimens of a clinically unsuspicious lobe do not reflect TNM staging results (2002 classification). In patients with such a unilateral lesion, we compared the biopsy results of a clinically unsuspicious lobe with the pathological assessment of the radical prostatectomy specimen and evaluated the importance of the results of biopsy specimens in an unsuspicious lobe.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between April 2000 and August 2004, 97 prostatic cancer patients without neoadjuvant therapy underwent a radical retropubic prostatectomy. In the patients with a unilateral lesion on digital rectal examination and/or transrectal ultrasound, the preoperative prostate-specific antigen levels, the results of contralateral biopsy specimens, and contralateral cancer foci in radical prostatectomy specimens were examined.

RESULTS

Of 39 patients with a unilateral palpable and/or visible lesion, 15 had contralateral positive biopsy findings, while 24 had contralateral negative biopsy findings. In a pathological analysis of prostatectomy specimens, a significantly higher rate of clinically significant cancer foci and a larger cancer volume in a clinically unsuspicious lobe have been observed in patients with contralateral positive biopsy findings than in patients with contralateral negative biopsy findings (p < 0.001). Moreover, contralateral cancer foci in patients with a contralateral positive biopsy specimen exhibited a more ominous state, such as seminal vesicle invasion, extraprostatic extension, and a positive surgical margin, than those in patients with a contralateral negative biopsy specimen (40.0 vs. 8.3%, p = 0.017). However, in a pathological analysis of both ipsilateral and contralateral cancer foci, the proportion of ominous pathological findings did not differ between the patients with a contralateral positive biopsy and those with a contralateral negative biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with clinically unilateral palpable and/or visible tumors confined to the prostate, the results of a bilateral biopsy need not be used to determine the clinical stage. However, in patients with positive biopsy results for an unsuspicious lobe, urologists should perform an extended surgical resection.

Intra-operative prostate examination: predictive value and effect on margin status

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the ability of intra-operative prostate examination (IOPE) to predict extraprostatic extension (EPE) and its effect on margin status in the region of the neurovascular bundle (NVB) when combined with wide excision.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 403 patients with clinical stage T1c prostate adenocarcinoma undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). All patients had IOPE during RRP, and those with palpable abnormalities in the region of the NVB underwent wide excision. Pathological outcomes were analysed.

RESULTS

Of 403 patients, 49 (12%) had a palpable abnormality in the region of the NVB. After wide excision, 18 (37%) of these 49 patients were found to have EPE at the site of the palpable abnormality; with wide excision of the NVB, only one of these 18 patients (6%) had a corresponding positive surgical margin (PSM). In 354 patients with a normal IOPE and who underwent bilateral NVB preservation, 30 were found to have EPE in the region of the NVB. The PSM rate in this subset was 23% (seven of 30). The positive predictive value of IOPE for detecting EPE was 37%.

CONCLUSION

IOPE detects abnormalities in 12% of patients with preoperative stage T1c prostate cancer. Although the predictive value of this test is limited, IOPE may decrease PSMs in a subset of patients with EPE in the region of the NVB. The present study reaffirms the value of IOPE for assessing the risk of extraprostatic disease, and for guiding surgical management.

Nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy: techniques and clinical considerations

There are essentially two ways to accomplish nerve preservation during radical retropubic prostatectomy: the 'apical approach' described by Walsh and the so-called 'lateral approach', a simplified method where the dissection is initially conducted on the portion of the bundles that courses posterolateral to the prostate. Do the different techniques differ in the ability to preserve potency and in the positive surgical margins rate? No previous study has addressed this question. Above all, the preoperative and intraoperative indications to spare or not the nerves remain a matter of debate. The present review is an attempt to elucidate these questions in light of the current literature.

Improved clinical staging system combining biopsy laterality and TNM stage for men with T1c and T2 prostate cancer: results from the SEARCH database

PURPOSE

A number of studies have failed to show significant differences in outcome following radical prostatectomy between men with palpable, clinically localized prostate cancer (cT2) and those whose tumors are not palpable (cT1c). We determined whether we could improve the prognostic value of the TNM staging system in men with cT1c and cT2 cancers by including information on whether prostate needle biopsy was unilaterally or bilaterally positive.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective survey of 992 patients from the SEARCH (Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital) Database treated with radical prostatectomy at 4 equal access medical centers between 1988 and 2002 was done. TNM 1992 clinical stage was T1c in 421 patients, T2a in 287, T2b in 202 and T2c in 82. Multivariate analysis was used to examine whether biopsy laterality and clinical stage were significant predictors of surgical margin status, nonorgan confined disease, seminal vesicle invasion, and time to prostate specific antigen (PSA) recurrence following radical prostatectomy.

RESULTS

Patients with clinical stages T2b and T2c cancers had similar rates of PSA recurrence, which were significantly higher than in patients with T1c and T2a disease, who also had similar rates of PSA recurrence. Bilateral positive biopsy further stratified patients with T1c and T2a disease (p = 0.01) but not those with T2b and T2c cancers (p = 0.207). Grouping these 1992 clinical stages with biopsy laterality resulted in a new clinical staging system, which was a significant predictor of PSA recurrence following radical prostatectomy (p <0.001). On multivariate analysis whether TNM clinical stage was evaluated as a categorical or continuous variable only PSA, biopsy Gleason score and the new clinical staging system (1992 TNM stage groupings combined with biopsy laterality) were significant independent predictors of time to biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining low (T1c and T2a) and high (T2b and T2c) risk 1992 clinical stages with biopsy laterality (unilateral versus bilateral positive) resulted in a new clinical staging system that was a stronger predictor of PSA recurrence following radical prostatectomy than the 1992 or 1997 TNM clinical staging system. If confirmed at other centers and in men who undergo with other treatment modalities, consideration should be given to revising the current TNM staging system to reflect these findings.

Avoidance and management of positive surgical margins before, during and after radical prostatectomy

Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy lead to an increased risk of progression and reduced disease free survival. Earlier detection of prostate cancer, appropriate patient selection and improved operative techniques can reduce the incidence of positive margins, though the risk can not be eliminated as pre-operative staging techniques are not sufficiently sensitive. Nerve sparing and bladder neck sparing do not adversely affect margin status in appropriately selected men. Once positive margins have been diagnosed the optimal management and the timing of treatment remains controversial. Adjuvant radiotherapy or salvage radiotherapy in men with a low PSA may improve local control and PSA free survival in some individuals, a survival benefit has not yet been established.

Site-specific positive margins at radical prostatectomy: assessing cancer-control benefits of wide excision of the neurovascular bundle on a side with cancer on biopsy

OBJECTIVE

To determine the potential risk of biopsy-selected nerve-sparing surgery based on the findings of site-specific extracapsular extension (ECE) and positive surgical margins (PSMs) in the area of the neurovascular bundle in radical prostatectomy specimens.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Controlling for surgical technique and pathological interpretation, 221 consecutive patients had their neurovascular bundles removed on the side with a positive biopsy. The surgical specimens were reviewed for ECE and PSM status, specifically in the area of the neurovascular bundle, from apex to base.

RESULTS

Of the 221 patients, 38% had ECE and 43 (20%) had a PSM in the area of the neurovascular bundle. This equates to a ratio of 51% for PSM/ECE. An additional 42 men (18%) had ECE with negative margins, but would have been at potential risk for PSMs if the neurovascular bundle had been preserved.

CONCLUSION

Preserving the neurovascular bundle on the side with a positive biopsy could result in a significantly greater incidence of PSM than with wide excision. Optimizing cancer control may require excision of the neurovascular bundle on a side known to have cancer on biopsy. In future site-specific analyses, the PSM/ECE ratio could be used as a marker comparing cancer-control outcomes from studies with differing technical approaches and indications for nerve-sparing surgery.

Risk of positive margins and biochemical recurrence in relation to nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of nerve-sparing (NS) radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) on surgical margins and biochemical recurrence.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Location and incidence of positive surgical margins, recurrence, and time to recurrence were assessed in a consecutive series of 734 men who underwent RRP for localized prostate cancer from 1992 through February 2000. NS procedures were used in 33% (n = 240) of 734 patients studied.

RESULTS

Surgical margins were positive for 24% (n = 58) and 31% (n = 152) of NS and non-NS patients, respectively (P =.06). No significant difference between the groups was found in location of positive margins (P =.92). Prostate-specific antigen level greater than 10 ng/mL, extraprostatic extension, tumor volume more than 20%, capsular penetration, Gleason score > or = 7, positive margins, and seminal vesicle invasion were associated with significantly increased risk of recurrence. However, NS patients were not at increased risk of recurrence compared with non-NS patients (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.53 to 1.72). The cumulative risk of recurrence within 3 and 5 years of surgery in NS patients was 9.7% and 14.4%, respectively, as compared with 17.1% and 21.1% for non-NS patients.

CONCLUSION

In patients with localized prostate cancer, neither margin status nor biochemical-free survival within 5 years of surgery were altered by the nerve preservation technique. Given our experience, we recommend preservation of neurovascular bundles in these patients whenever the procedure is technically feasible.

Ultrasound for prostate imaging and biopsy

Transrectal ultrasound guided systemic sextant needle biopsy of the prostate has been the procedure of choice for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Several shortcomings of this procedure have been recognized and there is concern that it may represent an inadequate sampling of the prostate. Refinements include modifications of biopsy location and an increase in the number of cores obtained. Enhanced ultrasound techniques may improve the accuracy of prostate biopsy. In addition, research continues to develop prognostic factors derived from the core biopsy that may enhance the prediction of tumor biology. This paper provides a basic review of transrectal ultrasound diagnosis of prostate cancer with emphasis on advances in this area.

Indicators of pathologic stage of prostate cancer and their use in clinical practice

Pathologic stage is the most reliable means of predicting the likelihood of curable prostate cancer at the time of definitive treatment. Its prediction is of the greatest importance to individuals with clinically localized disease, principally because of the therapeutic and prognostic implications. Multivariate models integrating variables that can be derived from clinical and pathologic assessment have been shown to be reliable and useful in urologic practice. Among these variables, the combination of clinical stage, serum PSA, and biopsy Gleason score provides reliable assessment of the risk for extraprostatic disease that can be used readily for counseling individual patients. Other biopsy-derived parameters may contribute additional information, but their value in multivariate analysis has not been validated in a multi-institutional setting. The development of new prognostic markers is a priority objective in current research to distinguish patients in whom cancer cannot be controlled by surgical treatment. For patients undergoing radical prostatectomy, definitive pathologic stage certainly will remain an important prognostic factor; therefore, clinical practice will continue to be determined by its accurate prediction.

Clinical staging of prostate cancer: reproducibility and clarification of issues

The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for prostate cancer adopted in 1992 is based on tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) designations. It has been widely accepted for use in local and advanced disease. The purpose of this study was to assess reproducibility of staging among observers and to help clarify staging issues. Twelve prostate cancer cases were sent to 20 physicians with special expertise in prostate cancer including eight urologists, eight radiation oncologists, and four medical oncologists. Physicians were asked to assign a stage based on the 1992 AJCC clinical staging. The most frequently reported stage assigned to each case was taken to be the consensus. Agreement was the percentage of physicians who reported that particular stage. Seventy-five percent of the physicians responded. The overall agreement for assignment of T stage was 63.9%. Differences were found by specialty for inclusion of available information in designating a T stage. The overall agreement for N stage was 73.8%. The most common designation was Nx regardless of availability of a computed tomography scan. The overall agreement for M stage was 76.6%. Without a bone scan the most common designation was Mx regardless of Gleason grade or prostate-specific antigen (PSA). A frequent comment was that PSA was more indicative of disease extent than current clinical staging. The reproducibility of the 1992 clinical AJCC staging is poor even among experts in the field. This problem arises primarily from disagreement regarding which studies are included in assigning a stage. Some of these difficulties are addressed in the 1997 revision. However, the clinical staging does not address the true biological significance of disease in many instances.

American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) recommendations for transperineal permanent brachytherapy of prostate cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE

To develop and disseminate the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) recommendations for the clinical quality assurance and guidelines of permanent transperineal prostate brachytherapy with 125I or 103Pd.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The ABS formed a committee of experts in prostate brachytherapy to develop consensus guidelines through a critical analysis of published data supplemented by their clinical experience. The recommendations of the panels were reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors of the ABS.

RESULTS

Patients with high probability of organ-confined disease are appropriately treated with brachytherapy alone. Brachytherapy candidates with a significant risk of extraprostatic extension should be treated with supplemental external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Patient selection guidelines were developed. Dosimetric planning of the implant should be carried out for all patients before seed insertion. A modified peripheral loading is preferred. The AAPM TG-43 recommendations requiring a change in prescription dose for 125I sources should be universally implemented. The recommended prescription doses for monotherapy are 145 Gy for 125I and 115-120 Gy for 103Pd. The corresponding boost doses (after 40-50 Gy EBRT) are 100-110 Gy and 80-90 Gy, respectively. Clinical evidence to guide selection of radionuclide (103Pd or 125I) is lacking. Post implant dosimetry and evaluation must be performed on all patients. It is suggested that the dose that covers 90% (D90) and 100% (D100) of the prostate volume and the percentage of the prostate volume receiving the prescribed dose (V100) be obtained from a dose-volume histogram (DVH) and reported.

CONCLUSION

Guidelines for appropriate patient selection, dose reporting, and improved quality of permanent prostate brachytherapy are presented. These broad recommendations are intended to be technical and advisory in nature, but the ultimate responsibility for the medical decisions rests with the treating physician. This is a constantly evolving field, and the recommendations are subject to modifications as new data becomes available.

Relationship of ultrasound staging and bilateral biopsy positivity to outcome in stage T1c prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy

OBJECTIVES

The strict definition of Stage T1c prostate cancer is that the tumor is not palpable on digital rectal examination (DRE) or seen on imaging studies such as ultrasound. The inclusion of ultrasound imaging was brought about without an understanding of the relationship between ultrasound upstaging and prognosis. We have also noticed that in clinical practice, treatment decisions are made on the basis of the finding of bilateral versus unilateral biopsy positivity. The objectives in this study were to determine the prognostic significance of upstaging by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) to uT2 or uT3, and unilateral versus bilateral biopsy positivity in patients with Stage T1c cancer as determined by DRE (DRE-Stage T1c patients).

METHODS

Between 1987 and 1995 there were 643 patients with DRE-Stage T1-T2 prostate cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy; 24 had T1a, 76 had T1b, 183 had T1c, 133 had T2a, 168 had T2b, and 59 had T2c. Of these, 135 DRE-Stage T1c patients underwent ultrasound staging and 122 underwent bilateral prostate biopsies. All had pretreatment prostate-specific antigen values (PSAs) available and no patient received adjuvant androgen ablation. The median pretreatment PSA was 9.1 ng/mL, median radiotherapy dose was 66.0 Gy, and median follow-up was 41 months. Post-treatment failure was defined as disease recurrence and/or two elevations in PSA on consecutive follow-up visits.

RESULTS

The 5-year freedom from failure rate for DRE-Stage T1c patients (71%) was not significantly different from that of DRE-Stage T1b (65%) or DRE-Stage T2a (71%) patients. There was a trend (P = 0.1) toward a worse outcome for DRE-Stage T2b/T2c patients compared with DRE-Stage T1b/T1c/T2a patients. The distribution of DRE-Stage T1c patients by ultrasound staging was 29 with uT1c, 88 with uT2, and 18 with uT3 findings. Twenty percent of patients had bilateral positive biopsy specimens. In univariate and multivariate analyses, the only correlates of patient outcome were pretreatment PSA (P < or = 0.002) and isocenter dose (P = 0.03). TRUS upstaging had no effect on freedom from failure; uT1c patients had about the same risk of relapse or a rising PSA as uT2 or uT3 patients. Patients with bilateral positive prostate biopsy specimens had about the same prognosis as those with unilateral positive biopsy specimens.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with DRE-Stage T1c prostate cancer, the data indicate that ultrasound staging and bilateral biopsy positivity are not predictive of outcome for patients treated with external beam radiotherapy and treatment decisions should not be based on these parameters.

Incidence of positive surgical margins after biopsy-selected nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVES

The selection criteria for a nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (NSRP) are not thoroughly investigated and are based mainly on preoperative digital rectal examinations and intraoperative findings. At our institution NSRP is performed only on patients whose preoperative systematic sextant biopsy of the prostate showed only unilateral cancer. To prove the safety of these criteria, we analyzed the incidence of positive surgical margins and tumor progression rate in patients who were selected for an NSRP only by the result of the biopsy.

METHODS

Preoperative systematic sextant biopsies revealed unilateral cancer in 69 preoperatively potent men of 289 consecutive prostatic cancer patients (23.9%); contralateral NSRP was performed on these 69 patients. The prostate specimens were investigated by using a 3-mm step-section technique to identify positive surgical margins. Tumor progression was defined as a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level greater than 0.4 ng/mL in the native and greater than 0.025 ng/mL in the suprasensitive postoperative blood test. Mean follow-up was 15 months (range 6 to 24).

RESULTS

In 69 patients who underwent NSRP, 11 positive margins (15.9%) were found. Only 3 patients (4.3%) had a positive margin on the nerve-sparing side. In 220 patients who underwent non-NSRP 59 positive margins (26.8%) were detected. PSA recurrence rate after 12 months was similar in patients with NSRP and non-NSRP. Analysis of systematic sextant biopsies gives safe selection criteria because in approximately 95% the surgical margin on the nerve-sparing side will be negative.

CONCLUSIONS

Basing the indication for an NSRP on the results of preoperative systematic biopsies was safe according to margin status and postoperative PSA, when all patients with tumor in one of the three biopsy cores of each side of the prostate were excluded from an NS technique on that side. Such a strict approach will exclude approximately 30% of patients from NSRP unnecessarily because of tumor findings on a prostate side where the cancer is still organ-confined. Less strict criteria, including patients with only well-differentiated cancer and a maximum of one positive biopsy on the evaluated side, seem to be as safe as the described selection. However, data on these patients need further evaluation.

Stage T1c prostate cancer: defining the appropriate staging evaluation and the role for pelvic lymphadenectomy

A good staging system should be able to accurately reflect the natural history of a malignant disease, to express the extent of the disease at the time of diagnosis, and stratify patients in prognostically distinctive groups. The staging system for prostate cancer, as it is today, fails to fulfill these requirements. Approximately one third of the patients who undergo surgery for complete excision of prostate cancer in fact do not have a localize disease. The incidence of tumor at the inked margin may reach 30% for T1 stage and up to 60% for clinical T2b prostate cancer according to comparison with pathologic examination of resected specimen. Several concepts have been recently proposed as a means of improving the accuracy of the available staging system. In this paper, we review current aspects of clinical and pathological staging of prostate cancer, and the importance of these new concepts on the early stages of prostate cancer.

Clinicopathological features of prostate cancer detected by transrectal ultrasonography-guided systematic six-sextant biopsy

BACKGROUND

The objectives of this study were to compare the efficacy of 3 modalities (prostate-specific antigen (PSA) assay, digital rectal examination (DRE), and transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)) in detecting prostate cancer which was pathologically confirmed by TRUS-guided systematic six-sextant biopsy, and to investigate the relationship between the number of positive cores and several clinicopathological parameters.

METHODS

Between 1992 and 1994, 297 males (155 from a mass screening program and 142 identified as outpatients) with a mean age of 71 years, underwent examinations including PSA determination, DRE, TRUS and systematic six-sextant biopsy, and/or additional directed biopsy.

RESULTS

Prostate cancer was detected in 93 men. The sensitivity level of the PSA assay was significantly higher (85%) than that of either DRE or TRUS. Patients with an abnormal DRE or TRUS, elevated PSA levels, and those in the T3-T4 category or with moderate to poorly-differentiated adenocarcinomas had more positive biopsy cores (P < 0.05). Also, the relationships of both the number of positive biopsy cores and tumor grade to bone metastasis were significant (P < 0.01). Of 209 hypoechoic areas identified by transrectal ultrasonography, 42% were cancerous, and of 427 isoechoic areas, 12% were cancerous. The percentage of positive biopsy cores with hypoechoic areas was 86% in the subjects with a PSA > 10 ng/mL, but low (9%) in subjects with a PSA < or = 4 ng/mL, and the percentage of negative biopsy cores with a normal TRUS was high (98%) in subjects with a PSA of < or = 4 ng/mL, but lower (67%) in subjects with a PSA > 10 ng/mL.

CONCLUSION

The serum PSA assay was more useful than either DRE or TRUS in detecting prostate cancer. The percentage of bone metastasis increased concomitant with the number of positive biopsy cores, and the positive biopsy rate of hypoechoic areas positively correlated with the PSA level.

Update on the appropriate staging evaluation for newly diagnosed prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Prostate cancer clinical staging methods and decision support tools were reviewed to assess their accuracy to predict pathological staging results and determine what comprises an appropriate clinical staging evaluation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The MEDLINE data base was searched and 238 abstracts were obtained. Data were extracted from 142 articles that evaluated the preoperative accuracy of digital rectal examination, prostate specific antigen, prostatic acid phosphatase, systematic biopsy parameters (including Gleason scoring), seminal vesicle biopsy, various imaging studies and pelvic lymphadenectomy versus pathological staging results. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy rates were calculated and tabulated from the reported data on each method or decision support tools for organ confined, nonorgan confined and lymph node metastatic tumor.

RESULTS

Decision support tools based on logistic regression analysis, which combine several statistically independent staging parameters, had greater accuracy than any single clinical staging method alone. The most accurate decision support tools for clinical staging combined digital rectal examination (T stage), systematic biopsy parameters (including Gleason scoring) and prostate specific antigen.

CONCLUSIONS

The components that comprise the most accurate decision support tools for clinical staging represent an appropriate staging evaluation for the newly diagnosed prostate cancer patient in 1997. Limited use of radiographic imaging and seminal vesicle biopsy may be indicated in select patients to detect bone metastases, and plan pelvic lymphadenectomy and surgical therapy.

The role of transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy-based staging, preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen, and biopsy Gleason score in prediction of final pathologic diagnosis in prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the role of ultra sound-guided systematic and lesion-directed biopsies, biopsy gleason score, preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as three objective and reproducible variables to provide a reliable combination in preoperative identification of risk of extraprostatic extension in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

The case records of 813 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer were analyzed. All had multiple systematic biopsies, two to three from each lobe, in addition to lesion-directed biopsies. Additionally, biopsies were done on seminal vesicles (SVs), if abnormal. Based on biopsy results, patients were classified as having stage B1 (T2a-T2b) or B2 (T2c) disease, depending on whether biopsies from one or both lobes were positive and stage C (T3) if there was evidence of SV involvement by biopsy of biopsies from areas of extracapsular extension as seen on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) were positive. Logistic regression analyses with log likelihood chi-square test was used to define the correlation between individual as well as combination of preoperative variables and pathologic stage.

RESULTS

On final pathologic examination, 473 (58%) patients had organ-confined disease, 188 (23%) had extracapsular extension (ECE), with or without positive surgical margins, and 72 (9%) had SV involvement. Eighty (10%) patients had pelvic lymph node metastases. Biopsy-based staging was superior to clinical staging in predicting final pathologic diagnosis. Logistic regression analyses revealed that the combination of biopsy-based stage, preoperative serum PSA, and biopsy Gleason score provided the best prediction of final pathologic stage. Probability plots constructed with these data can provide significant information on risk of extraprostatic extension in individual patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that TRUS-guided systematic biopsy in combination with preoperative serum PSA and biopsy Gleason score may provide a cost-effective approach for management decisions and prognostication in patients with prostate cancer.

Sextant prostate biopsies. A histopathologic correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens

BACKGROUND

Among patients with clinically localized prostate cancer, preoperative prediction of tumor volume and pathologic stage has been unreliable. This study examines the application of transrectal ultrasound-guided sextant biopsies to predict the extent of disease.

METHODS

One hundred and two patients with clinically resectable prostate cancer were evaluated by systematic sextant biopsies. Radical prostatectomy specimens were embedded totally as whole mounts, tumor areas were outlined, and volume was measured using a digital scanner. The number of positive sextant biopsies was compared with age, race, preoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA), PSA density, DNA ploidy, pathologic stage, capsular and seminal vesicle involvement, prostate and tumor volume, and Gleason score. Stepwise logistic regression was used to determine if pathologic stage or tumor size could be predicted by these parameters.

RESULTS

The number of positive sextant biopsies correlated with traditional prognostic indicators. When patients with three or fewer positive biopsies were compared with those with four or more positive sextant biopsies, significant differences were identified relative to preoperative PSA (P < 0.001), tumor volume (P < 0.001), pathologic stage (P < 0.001), Gleason score (P < 0.001), seminal vesicle involvement (P < 0.001), and capsular penetration (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences based on age, race, DNA ploidy, and overall prostate volume. Logistic regression showed that patients with four or more positive sextant biopsies and high Gleason score had a greater likelihood of pT3 classification. Likewise, the probabilities of a tumor volume less than 0.5 ml could be predicted by the number of positive sextant biopsies and PSA alone. The number of positive sextant biopsies was the only factor that could predict a tumor volume greater than 4.0 ml.

CONCLUSION

The number of positive sextant biopsies appears to be an important prognostic indicator of pathologic (pT) classification and tumor volume. This information is valuable in selecting the treatment strategy for patients with prostate cancer.

Usefulness of aspiration cytology in prostate cancer detection

Aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy were performed in 79 patients who were suspected of having prostate cancer. Aspiration cytology and TURP were done in 77 cases not suspected of the disease. In the former group, they were both positive in 13 cases, aspiration cytology was negative and core needle biopsy positive in 4, and the reverse in 3 cases in whom cancer was confirmed by repeat core biopsy. All of the latter group were judged by aspiration cytology as being benign. Three cancers were detected by TURP. Aspiration cytology is a recommendable method in subjects with suspected prostate cancer.

Ultrasound-guided four quadrant biopsy of the prostate: efficacy in the diagnosis of isoechoic cancer

Five hundred and eighty men underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate using the four quadrant biopsy (4QB) technique. Four hundred and three men had focal hypoechoic lesions of the peripheral gland but the other 177 men referred because of concern for the presence of cancer had no discrete sonographic lesion. Cancer was found from 4QB in only 32 of these 177 men (18.1%) compared to 158 of the 403 men (39.2%) with focal hypoechoic lesions (P < 0.001). Additional biopsy evidence of cancer was found in contralateral isoechoic (sonographically normal) quadrants in 41 men with focal hypoechoic cancerous lesions. In 17 men with hypoechoic lesions that were biopsy-benign, cancer was found in other isoechoic quadrants. There was no difference between the average Gleason scores of hypoechoic cancers and isoechoic cancers, other than when cancers were incidentally found in men with benign focal hypoechoic lesions. These had significantly lower scores (P = 0.02). Cancer yield in the 177 men without hypoechoic lesions increased as a function of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level; 11% if PSA < 10ng/ml, 32% if > 20ng/ml. Prostatitis was the most common abnormal biopsy finding in these men. 4QB increases the yield of prostate cancer compared to simple biopsy of hypoechoic lesions and improves knowledge of local disease extent. 4QB is recommended for men with elevated PSA levels but no peripheral gland sonographic abnormality.

Systematic biopsies accurately predict extracapsular extension of prostate cancer and persistent/recurrent detectable PSA after radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVES

To determine if methodic analysis of systematic echo-guided biopsies associated with prostatic-specific antigen (PSA) and PSA density can accurately predict the actual pathologic stage of prostate cancer (Ca P).

METHODS

One hundred patients with clinically localized (T1, T2) Ca P who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) were preoperatively staged by digital rectal examination (DRE), measurement of serum PSA (Yang Pros-check) and PSA density (PSAD), and transrectal echo-guided systematic biopsies (three in each lobe aiming to sample prostatic capsule) to evaluate T stage, Gleason grade, number of positive biopsies, and presence of cancer in the periprostatic tissues. Radical prostatectomy specimens were processed following the McNeal method. The PSA levels were measured every month for 2 years.

RESULTS

Extracapsular disease was detected on the specimen in 45% of the patients, persistent/recurrent detectable PSA in 47% (mean follow-up 18 months). Clinical stage T2 B, presence of Gleason grade 4, PSA > 25 ng/mL, PSAD > 0.6, number of positive biopsies > 66% of the total number of cores taken had a positive predictive value (PPV), respectively, of 72%, 66%, 80%, and 87%. Periprostatic tissue was evaluable on the core biopsies in 77% of the cases. Presence of cancer in the periprostatic fat on the core biopsies had a PPV of 94% for extracapsular disease/biological recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of extracapsular cancerous tissue on prostatic core biopsies accurately predicts extracapsular extension of Ca P. Therefore, care should be taken when performing prostate biopsies to sample the prostate capsule and surrounding tissues to obtain a more accurate staging of the disease. The second best predictor of extracapsular disease is the percentage of positive biopsies.

Systematic biopsies and digital rectal examination to identify the nerve-sparing side for radical prostatectomy without risk of positive margin in patients with clinical stage T2, N0 prostatic carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Systematic biopsies and digital rectal examination were used to identify the nerve-sparing side for radical prostatectomy without risk of positive margin in patients with clinical Stage T2, N0 prostatic carcinoma.

METHODS

We studied specimens from 73 consecutive radical prostatectomies by the 3 mm step-section technique for clinical Stage T2a, T2b (n = 57), and T2c (n = 16) tumors to see whether digital rectal examination or the use of 6 systematic biopsies could identify the side where nerve-sparing could be used without risk of positive margin.

RESULTS

In 39 of the 57 (68%) patients with clinical Stage T2a, T2b 3 contralateral biopsies were negative. Only in these 39 patients was unilateral nerve-sparing done on the biopsy-negative side. None of these 39 specimens had a positive margin at this nerve-sparing side. The other 18 (32%) of the 57 patients with clinical T2a, T2b tumors had positive biopsies on the contralateral side of the palpable tumor; no nerve-sparing was done in this group. Of the 18 specimens, only 5 (28%) had full capsular penetration on the contralateral side in the area of the nerve bundle and thus the potential risk of positive margins if contralateral nerve-sparing would have been done. That could mean that 13 patients of these 18 (23% of the whole group of the 57 patients with T2a, T2b lesions) were unnecessarily excluded from the unilateral contralateral nerve-sparing.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that unilateral contralateral nerve-sparing can be done safely in patients with T2a, T2b lesions without risk of positive margins when three biopsies on the contralateral side are negative. We calculate that by such strict selection criteria for unilateral contralateral nerve-sparing technique only one of five patients with clinical unilateral tumors will be excluded unnecessarily from the nerve-sparing technique.

Valore Predittivo del Mapping Prostatico Nella Valutazione Preoperatoria Del Volume Della Neoplasia Prostatica: Studio Ecografico ed Anatomopatologico su 25 Pazienti Sottoposti a Prostatectomia Radicale Retropubica

Quantitative tumour volume is reported to be the single most important morphologic predictor for lymph node metastases and distant spread in the individual patient with prostatic cancer. 25 patients with histologically proved prostatic cancer underwent Prostatic Mapping before Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy. Surgical specimens were processed and prostatic cancer volume was calculated according to abbreviated standard procedure that avoids the serial blocking of prostatectomy specimens required by standard techniques. Our study demonstrated a strong correlation between Prostatic Mapping categories and prostatic cancer volumes. This ability of Prostatic Mapping to estimate preoperatively the tumour volume may be a useful clinical tool to help guide surgical therapy and assess prognosis.

Prostate specific antigen levels in men older than 50 years without clinical evidence of prostatic carcinoma

In their derivation of normal prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels (0 to 4.0 ng./ml.) Hybritech used almost exclusively men less than 60 years old. The purpose of this study was to define PSA levels by age decade in men older than 50 years without clinical evidence of prostatic carcinoma or so-called cancer-free. We define the cancer-free population as men with a PSA less than or equal to 4.0 ng./ml. and nonsuspicious digital rectal examination, and those with an abnormality in either parameter with a nonmalignant prostate biopsy. A total of 755 men was recruited for a prostate cancer detection study using serum PSA and digital rectal examination, of whom 728 fulfilled our criteria of cancer-free. Newly derived mean and standard deviation were 1.32 +/- 1.10 ng./ml. in the 50 to 59-year group, 1.91 +/- 1.72 ng./ml. in the 60 to 69-year group and 2.36 +/- 1.98 ng./ml. in the 70 to 79-year group. The upper limits for PSA (mean+2 standard deviations) by age were 3.5 ng./ml. in the 50 to 59-year group, 5.4 ng./ml. in the 60 to 69-year group and 6.3 ng./ml. in the 70 to 79-year group. The apparent accuracy of these new limits is strong in the 60 to 69-year group but it declines in the next decade. The data support further attempts at using PSA, age and digital rectal examination to establish selection criteria for prostate biopsy with adequate sensitivity and specificity.

Localized prostate carcinoma. Surgical management

Total prostatectomy in the properly selected patient will provide disease-free survival rates comparable to the expected survival in similarly aged men for up to 30 years of observation (Figure 4). Patients who undergo total prostatectomy accept a very small risk of long-term permanent complications or mortality, and effective treatment is available for most complications. The morbidity and costs associated with hormone refractory metastatic prostate cancer are significant, with bone pain and anemia from bone marrow invasion, bladder dysfunction (retention, incontinence, and hematuria), urinary tract infection, anorexia, and uremia from obstructed ureters being common sequelae in the months before death. In the properly selected patient, minimal risk is incurred from total prostatectomy, the potential complications are well defined and manageable, and long-term disease-free survival is seen in most patients.