Short arm dicentric Y chromosome in a sterile man: a case report

Non-chimerism and chimerism pseudo dicentric Y chromosome: two case reports about azoospermia and cytogenetic/molecular genetic analysis in the Chinese population

OBJECTIVE

To report the cytogenetic and molecular genetic analysis of the first two cases of non-chimerism and chimerism karyotype in Chinese male patients who suffer from azoospermia, which may be caused by pseudo dicentric Y chromosomes.

DESIGN

Case study.

SETTING

Academic reproductive medicine center.

PATIENTS

Two male patients with azoospermia, carrying pseudo dicentric Y chromosome.

INTERVENTIONS

Review the records of inquiry, testicular biopsy, pathological examination, semen routine examination, endocrine evaluation, cytogenetic chromosomal analysis, and FISH detection of peripheral blood to evaluate Y chromosome deletion.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

To investigate the possible association among pseudo dicentric Y, chimeric status and azoospermia.

RESULTS

Two patients were both diagnosed with azoospermia by a variety of andrology inspections. Further chromosomal analysis and FISH indicated their pseudo dicentric Y chromosome and different chimerism status. PCR confirmed simultaneous deletions of AZFb and AZFc regions in the Y chromosome of both patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Pseudodicentric Y chromosome affecting the long arm may lead to a male phenotype by duplicating the sex-determining region of Y chromosome (SRY) fragment and chimeric status may further impact patient's hormone levels, which obstruct spermatogenesis. However, the deletion of the azoospermia factor (AZF) is likely the key factor that causes azoospermia.

Testicular biopsy. Contemporary interpretation

Biopsy of the testis is not universally accepted in contrast with biopsies of other organs. The pathologist studies and reports on the pathophysiology of the testicular biopsy specimen. Methodology requires the inclusion of qualitative and quantitative studies, the evaluation of the lesion's evolution (prognosis), and, often, therapeutic advice regarding treatment. Cooperation between pathologists and clinicians optimizes the utility of the biopsy for the patient.

Short-arm dicentric Y chromosome associated with Sertoli-cell-only tubule

We report a case of a short-arm dicentric Y chromosome associated with Sertoli-cell-only tubule. Chromosomal analysis, using G- and C-banding techniques, revealed: 45,X/46,X psu dic(Y) (pter-->q11::q11-->pter)/46,X + mar. Staining by fluorescence in situ hybridization using a Y chromosome centromere-specific DNA probe showed two bright spots in the pseudodicentric Y chromosome and one in the marker chromosome. It is assumed that Sertoli-cell-only tubule is caused by deletion or disruption of the azoospermic factor gene located distal in Yq11.

Isodicentric Y chromosome: cytogenetic, molecular and clinical studies and review of the literature

Dicentrics are among the most common structural abnormalities of the human Y chromosome. Predicting the phenotypic consequences of different duplications and deletions of dicentric Y chromosomes is usually complicated by varying degrees of mosaicism (45,X cell lines), which may, in some cases, remain undetected. Molecular studies in patients with dicentric Y chromosomes have been few, and only two studies have attempted to determine the presence of SRY (the putative testis-determining factor gene). We report an 18-year-old female with short stature, amenorrhea, hirsutism, hypoplastic labia minora, and clitoromegaly who has a 45,X/46,X,idic(Y)(p11.32)/47,X,idic(Y)(p11.32),idic(Y) (p11.32) karyotype. Southern analysis using Y-specific probes (Y97, 2D6, 1F5, pY3.4) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis using primers for ZFY and SRY were positive for all loci tested, indicating that almost all of the Y chromosome was present. Our findings and an extensive review of the literature emphasize the importance of molecular analyses of abnormal Y chromosomes before any general conclusions can be reached concerning the relative effects of the Y-chromosome abnormality and mosaicism on sexual differentiation.

Phenotype/karyotype correlations of Y chromosome aneuploidy with emphasis on structural aberrations in postnatally diagnosed cases

Over 600 cases with a Y aneuploidy (other than non-mosaic 47,XYY) were reviewed for phenotype/karyotype correlations. Except for 93 prenatally diagnosed cases of mosaicism 45,X/46,XY (79 cases), 45,X/47,XYY (8 cases), and 45,X/46,XY/47,XYY (6 cases), all other cases were ascertained postnatally. Special emphasis was placed on structural abnormalities. This review includes 11 cases of 46,XYp-; 90 cases of 46,XYq- (52 cases non-mosaic; 38 cases 45,X mosaic); 34 cases of 46,X,r(Y) (9 cases non-mosaic and 25 cases 45,X mosaic); 8 cases of 46,X,i(Yp) (4 non-mosaic and 4 mosaic with 45,X); 12 cases of 46,X,i(Yq) (7 non-mosaic and 5 mosaic); 44 cases of 46,X,idic(Yq); 80 cases of 46,X, idic(Yp) (74 cases had breakpoints at Yq11 and 6 cases had breakpoints at Yq12); 130 cases of Y/autosome translocations (50 cases with a Y/A reciprocal translocation, 20 cases of Y/A translocation in 45,X males, 60 cases of Y/DP or Y/Gp translocations); 52 cases of Y/X translocations [47 cases with der(X); 4 cases with der(Y), and 1 case with 45,X with a der(X)], 7 cases of Y/Y translocations; 151 postnatally diagnosed cases of 45,X/46,XY; 14 postnatally diagnosed cases of 45,X/47,XYY; 18 cases of 45,X/46,XY/47,XYY; and 93 aforementioned prenatally diagnosed cases with a 45,X cell line. It is clear that in the absence of a 45,X cell line, the presence of an entire Yp or a region of it including SRY would lead to a male phenotype in an individual with a Y aneuploidy, whereas the lack of Yp invariably leads to a female phenotype with typical or atypical Ullrich-Turner syndrome (UTS). Once there is a 45,X cell line, regardless of whether there is Yp, Yq, or both Yp and Yq, or even a free Y chromosome in other cell line, there is an increased chance for that individual to be a phenotypic female with UTS manifestations or to have ambiguous external genitalia. This review once again shows a major difference in reported phenotypes between postnatally and prenatally diagnosed cases of 45,X/46,XY, 45,X/47,XYY, and 45,X/46,XY/47,XYY mosaicism. It appears that ascertainment bias can explain the fact that all known patients with postnatal diagnosis are phenotypically abnormal, while over 90% of prenatally diagnosed cases are reported to have a normal male phenotype. Further elucidation of major Y genes and their clinical significance can be expected in the rapidly expanding gene mapping projects. More, consequently better, phenotype/karyotype correlations can be anticipated at both the cytogenetic and the molecular level.