Randomized phase II evaluation of carboplatin and CHIP in advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

Increasing cure rates of solid tumors by immune checkpoint inhibitors

Immunotherapy has become the central pillar of cancer therapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), a major category of tumor immunotherapy, reactivate preexisting anticancer immunity. Initially, ICIs were approved only for advanced and metastatic cancers in the salvage setting after or concurrent with chemotherapy at a response rate of around 20-30% with a few exceptions. With significant progress over the decade, advances in immunotherapy have led to numerous clinical trials investigating ICIs as neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapies for resectable solid tumors. The promising results of these trials have led to the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of ICIs as neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapies for non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, triple-negative breast cancer, and bladder cancer, and the list continues to grow. This therapy represents a paradigm shift in cancer treatment, as many early-stage cancer patients could be cured with the introduction of immunotherapy in the early stages of cancer. Therefore, this topic became one of the main themes at the 2021 China Cancer Immunotherapy Workshop co-organized by the Chinese American Hematologist and Oncologist Network, the China National Medical Products Administration and the Tsinghua University School of Medicine. This review article summarizes the current landscape of ICI-based immunotherapy, emphasizing the new clinical developments of ICIs as curative neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies for early-stage disease.

Role of immunotherapy in bladder cancer

The role of immunotherapy in bladder urothelial cancers is rapidly expanding. Since the initial second-line therapy approval for patients who fail prior platinum-based chemotherapy, the use of immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors has been rapidly evolving. There are approved indications for first-line metastatic disease in the platinum-ineligible patients or the cisplatin-ineligible PD-L1 positive patients, and there is a label for high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer who are BCG-refractory. In addition, a trial on maintenance immunotherapy with avelumab showed positive findings with improvement in overall survival that has also changed standard of care for these patients. There are ongoing clinical trials evaluating its use in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant perioperative muscle-invasive bladder cancer setting. The pivotal trials that led to these FDA approvals and promising and ongoing trials are discussed herein.

Clinical evidence for the first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma: Current paradigms and emerging treatment options

BACKGROUND

Patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) have poor outcomes, with 5-year survival rates of <5% for those with metastatic, stage IV disease. We have reviewed current treatment paradigms and emerging treatment options for these patients.

METHODS

The websites of seven national or international organizations were searched for metastatic UC treatment guidelines. Systematic literature reviews were conducted to identify evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of chemotherapy for patients with previously untreated, unresectable, stage IV UC. Searches included congress databases and articles published between 1990 and 2018. In order to align with the latest treatment paradigms in first-line advanced UC, a focused literature search was conducted to identify evidence supporting immuno-oncology (IO) agents.

RESULTS

For advanced UC, guidelines universally recommend cisplatin-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment for eligible patients and carboplatin-based regimens for those unfit to receive cisplatin. Despite the evaluation of a number of different cytotoxic regimens over the years, including triplet combinations, survival outcomes have not improved markedly with chemotherapy. Median overall survival with standard of care chemotherapy is ~13 months. Based on the results of single-arm, phase II studies, recent treatment guidelines have included atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) and pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1) as first-line options for cisplatin-ineligible patients whose tumors express high levels of PD-L1. However, emerging evidence from RCTs of IO agents, including both cisplatin-eligible and cisplatin-ineligible patients, suggest that survival times exceeding 20 months are possible.

CONCLUSIONS

After having reached a plateau with chemotherapy, the treatment landscape for advanced UC is evolving. Survival outcomes for patients with advanced UC are improving with treatment modalities involving IO agents.

M-Veca (Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Epidoxorubicin and Carboplatin) in the Treatment of Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma

Aims and Background

Urothelial cancer is a chemosensitive disease. However, cisplatin or anthracycline-containing regimens still provoke severe toxicity mainly due to reduced renal function and poor performance status (PS) of patients. The aim of this study was to verify the possibility of substituting carboplatin for cisplatin and epirublcin for doxorubicin in the M-VAC regimen in order to reduce toxicity and improve patient tolerance.

Methods

Twenty patients with advanced urothelial tract tumors were treated with a chemotherapeutic regimen composed of methotrexate (30 mg/mq iv on days 1, 15, 22), vinblastine (3 mg/m2 iv on days 2, 15, 22), epidoxorubicin (35 mg/m2 iv on day 2) and carboplatin (250 mg/m2 iv on day 2) every four weeks (M-VECA). All patients had bidimensionally measurable disease.

Results

Of the 18 evaluable patients, 3 (17 %) obtained complete response and 7 (33 %) obtained partial response (50 % overall response). The median duration of response was 50 weeks (range, 28-88+). Grade III-IV toxicity (leukothrombocytopenia and mucositis) was observed in 20 % of cases. Nevertheless, recovery was prompt in all but 2 patients with poor PS who died of nadir sepsis.

Conclusions

M-VECA was an effective regimen for the treatment of patients with metastatic urothelial tumors and was safely employed in patients with a good PS. However, the possibility of substituting carboplatin for cisplatin as neoadjuvant therapy for less advanced stages needs further investigation in randomized studies.

Carboplatin, methotrexate, vinblastine, and epirubicin (M-VECa) as salvage treatment in patients with advanced bladder cancer: a phase II study

The primary objective of this study was to determine the activity and safety of carboplatin, methotrexate, vinblastine, and epirubicin (the M-VECa regimen) in patients with advanced bladder cancer after failure of at least one chemotherapy line. Treatment consisted of carboplatin 250 mg/m on day 1, methotrexate 30 mg/m on days 1 and 22, vinblastine 3 mg/m on days 2 and 22, and epirubicin 50 mg/m on day 2 every 28 days until disease progression or death. Response rate was the main end-point. Twenty-five patients were enrolled: the median age was 67 years (range 42-83) and there were 14 patients aged at least 70 years (56%). Fourteen patients had previously received vinflunine as a second-line treatment. Complete remission occurred in one patient (4%), partial remission in five patients (20%), and stable disease in eight patients (32%). The overall response rate was 24% [95% confidence interval (CI), 9.3-45.1%] and the overall disease control rate was 56% (95% CI, 34.9-75.5%). The median progression-free survival was 5.1 months (95% CI, 3.9-6.4) and the median overall survival was 9.5 months (95% CI, 7.1-11.2). Treatment was well tolerated: grade 3 neutropenia was documented in five patients and grade 3 nausea and vomiting in two patients. The M-VECa regimen seems to be feasible as second-line or third-line treatment in patients with advanced bladder cancer who have been pretreated with one or more chemotherapy lines, and may achieve encouraging results in terms of disease control rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival.

Weekly Paclitaxel and Carboplatin against Advanced Transitional Cell Cancer after Failure of a Platinum-Based Regimen

OBJECTIVE

Weekly administration of paclitaxel plus carboplatin is hypothesized to be an effective second-line treatment for advanced transitional cell cancer after failure of platinum-based regimen. In this phase 2 trial, we tested this hypothesis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced transitional cell cancer who showed evidence of progressive or recurrent disease after methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) therapy were eligible for this study. Weekly paclitaxel (80mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (AUC 2) were administered on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36; the cycle was repeated every 7 wk until disease progression or intolerable toxicity (maximum 18 doses).

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients entered this study. Among the 31 patients who were assessable, 10 had an objective response (overall response rate: 32.3%, 95% confidence interval, 15.8-48.7%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and median survival times were 3.7 and 7.9 mo, respectively. Among the 22 patients who received prior MVAC therapy for metastatic disease, 36% had an objective response; their median PFS and median survival times were 4.3 and 7.9 mo, respectively; neither survival time significantly differed from the survival time of those who received prior MVAC as adjuvant setting. Toxicities were mild except one toxic death due to neutropenic sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin was a manageable, active second-line treatment for advanced transitional cell cancer after failure of platinum-based therapy.

Systemic chemotherapy in locally advanced and/or metastatic bladder cancer

Transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder is a common malignancy. Advanced urothelial cancer is a chemosenstive neoplasm. Whereas the MVAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) regimen was long-considered the standard of care for patients with advanced disease, the evaluation of newer agents with retained activity and improved tolerability has been the focus of much investigation over the past decade. Combinations such as cisplatin-gemcitabine (GC) and intensified, G-CSF supported MVAC have shown more favourable toxicity profile and equal or even improved efficacy. Specific groups of patients (elderly, patients with renal dysfunction or poor performance status or co-morbidities) who cannot tolerate cisplatin-based therapy, should receive carboplatin, gemcitabine or taxane-based treatment. Continuing improvements in our understanding of the molecular phenotype of individual patient tumors may lead to the appropriate therapies that target molecular aberrations unique to this malignancy. This review will summarize recent developments in the management of locally advanced (T4b, N 2-3) and/or metastatic (M1) bladder cancer.

Systemic chemotherapy in inoperable or metastatic bladder cancer

Urothelial cancer is a common malignancy. The management of patients with recurrent disease after cystectomy or initially metastatic or unresectable disease represents a therapeutic challenge. Systemic chemotherapy prolongs survival but long-term survival remains infrequent. During recent years there has been improvement due to the use of novel chemotherapeutic agents, mainly gemcitabine and the taxanes. The long-considered-standard MVAC has been challenged by combinations showing more favourable toxicity profiles and equal (gemcitabine-cisplatin) or even improved (dose-dense, G-CSF-supported MVAC) efficacy. Specific interest has also been generated in specific groups of patients (elderly patients, patients with renal function impairment or comorbidities), who are not fit for the standard cisplatin-based chemotherapy but can derive significant benefit from carboplatin- or taxane-based treatment. Retrospective analyses have enabled the identification of groups of patients with different prognoses, who possibly require different therapeutic approaches. Modern chemotherapy offers a chance of long-term survival in patients without visceral metastases, possibly in combination with definitive local treatment. Finally, the progress of targeted therapies in other neoplasms seems to be reflected in advanced bladder cancer by recent studies indicating that biological agents can be combined with modern chemotherapy. The true role of such therapies is currently being evaluated.

Chemotherapy for Metastatic Bladder Cancer

This paper reviews the current status of systemic chemotherapy in the management of advanced and metastatic urothelial cancer. The activity of a number of single agents and combination drug regimens is discussed, and the small number of randomised-controlled studies available is also considered. Prognostic factors for response and survival, particularly long-term survival after systemic chemotherapy, are also reviewed. Special consideration is given to the role of systemic chemotherapy as a precursor to surgery (or radiotherapy) in locally advanced disease that is initially considered incurable. Therapeutic options for patients unable to tolerate cisplatin owing to renal impairment or other comorbidities are explored. Future directions are explored, including the role of molecular phenotyping in providing prognostic information, indicators of the likely success of conventional therapeutic measures and the development of specific targeted therapies.

Systemic chemotherapy for patients with bladder cancer – current controversies and future directions

Many localised, superficial bladder cancers can be effectively controlled. However, disease which has spread to nodes outside the pelvis or to distant organs is generally incurable and systemic therapies, rather than surgery, are appropriate. Combination chemotherapy based around established cytotoxic drugs such as cisplatin has proven benefit in palliating symptoms and prolonging survival in responsive patients with advanced disease. Combination chemotherapies which include newer cytotoxic drugs such as gemcitabine provide the potential for equivalent efficacy with less toxicity than established regimens. Between the extremes of superficial and advanced disease, muscle-invasive bladder cancers have traditionally been treated, with curative intent, by radical surgery or radiotherapy. However, newly published data suggest, for the first time, genuine survival benefits from peri-operative chemotherapy. This article reviews the evidence for cisplatin-based chemotherapy in advanced disease, assesses the potential benefits of newer cytotoxic drugs, discusses the latest evidence pertaining to peri-operative chemotherapy in muscle-invasive disease, and looks forward to potential new biological agents in the systemic therapy of bladder cancer.

Overview of advanced urothelial cancer trials of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

Advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium is an aggressive malignancy characterized by a median survival period of less than 1 year. Although this disease is moderately chemotherapy-sensitive, to the authors' knowledge the impact of therapy reported to date on survival has been minimal. The authors presented an overview of the results from a series of clinical trials conducted over a 25-year period under the auspices of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. They reviewed a series of antineoplastic agents identified by these studies with activity in advanced urothelial cancer and discussed current and future investigational goals and directions.

Overview of bladder cancer trials in the Cancer and Leukemia Group B

The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) Genitourinary Committee has developed a broad range of clinical trials across most stages of bladder cancer. Recurrence rates of superficial bladder cancer after transurethral resection range from 50-70%. Although adjuvant bacillus Calmette-Guerin reduces the risk of disease recurrence or progression, only 30% of patients have long-term disease-free survival. Because the development of novel secondline agents is needed, the CALGB is evaluating the utility of intravesicle gemcitabine as well as an oral proapoptotic agent (CP-461). In patients with locally advanced disease with an increased risk of disease recurrence after cystectomy, a randomized trial of conventional chemotherapy versus sequential dose-dense therapy is under development. The gemcitabine/cisplatin combination has become a commonly used regimen for the treatment of advanced transitional cell carcinoma (TCC). The CALGB is undertaking a Phase II study that incorporates a fixed dose rate gemcitabine infusion in this regimen, together with a selective epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, Iressa (Astra Zeneca, Wilmington, DE). In patients with renal insufficiency, a regimen of carboplatin, gemcitabine, and Iressa is planned. Novel agents, including arsenic trioxide and trastuzumab (Herceptin; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA), are being evaluated as secondline therapy in patients with advanced TCC who have disease progression after frontline therapy.

Progress in the management of metastatic bladder cancer

BACKGROUND

Inadequate survival results from single agents in the management of advanced bladder cancer have prompted several trials involving multidrug combinations to increase response rates and survival.

METHODS

Since the development of the MVAC regimen (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) and the CMV regimen (cisplatin, methotrexate, and vinblastine), other regimens have been tested. We evaluate results from regimens that include cisplatin combined with gemcitabine, paclitaxel, or docetaxel, and paclitaxel combined with gemcitabine or carboplatin.

RESULTS

Objective results observed with various new combinations are promising. Objective response (OR) rates of 41%, 59%, and 71% are reported with a regimen of gemcitabine plus cisplatin. Paclitaxel plus cisplatin produced OR rates of 65% and 72%.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of combination cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens in treating patients with metastatic bladder cancer has nearly doubled median survival to 12 months, with a 3-year survival of approximately 20% to 25%. Caution must be exercised in using some of the newer regimens as survival may be inferior compared with the MVAC regimen.

Comparison between a cisplatin-containing regimen and a carboplatin-containing regimen for recurrent or metastatic bladder cancer patients. A randomized phase II study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this randomized Phase II study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity of a cisplatin-containing regimen with a carboplatin-containing regimen for patients with recurrent or metastatic bladder cancer.

METHODS

Fifty-seven patients with recurrent or metastatic bladder cancer were randomized to receive M-VEC treatment (methotrexate, vinblastine, epirubicin, and cisplatin) (n = 29) or M-VECa treatment (methotrexate, vinblastine, epirubicin, and carboplatin) (n = 28). The chemotherapy was scheduled at 28-day intervals. Recombinant granulocyte-colony stimulating factors were administered daily when the absolute neutrophil count fell below 1000/mm3. The development of ototoxicity was evaluated by measuring auditory brain stem response.

RESULTS

Of the 57 entered patients, 55 were evaluable for response and toxicity. The overall clinical response rate was 71% (with 25% complete responses) in the M-VEC group and 41% (with 11% complete responses) in the M-VECa group (P = 0.04). M-VEC chemotherapy was associated with more pronounced side effects. There was a statistically significant difference between M-VEC and M-VECa in terms of gastrointestinal toxicity (P = 0.04), nephrotoxicity (P = 0.03), and neurotoxicity (P = 0.02) during Cycle 3 of chemotherapy. Leukopenia and neutropenia were worse in the M-VECa arm, but not significantly so (P = 0.4). Ototoxicity was only detected in one of seven examined M-VEC patients after two cycles of chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

M-VECa has a low level of gastrointestinal, renal, neurologic, and otologic toxicity, but is apparently less effective than M-VEC in the treatment of recurrent or metastatic bladder cancer. However, a larger, randomized Phase III trial is needed to confirm these results.

Platinum analogue combination chemotherapy: cisplatin, carboplatin, and methotrexate in patients with metastatic urothelial tract tumors. A phase II trial with evaluation of prognostic factors

BACKGROUND

Cisplatin is one of the single drugs that has shown the best documented effect in treating patients with locally recurrent or metastatic urothelial cancer. To the authors' knowledge, the effect of the combination of different platinum analogues in treating transitional cell carcinoma has not been evaluated previously neither experimentally nor in clinical studies.

METHODS

A Phase II trial of carboplatin (200 mg/m2), cisplatin (100 mg/m2), and methotrexate (250 mg/m2) with folinic acid rescue every 3 weeks was performed on 55 previously untreated patients with metastatic or locally recurrent urothelial cell carcinoma.

RESULTS

A response (complete response and partial response) was achieved in 21 of 51 evaluable patients (41%; 95% confidence limits, 28-56%). Twelve patients had no change, whereas 18 had progressive disease. Eight patients (16%) achieved a complete response, and most of these survived more than 2 years. No patient with poor performance (performance status score > or = 2) or bone metastases achieved a complete response. The median survival for all patients was 8.4 months. Multivariate survival analyses showed that performance status and alkaline phosphatase levels were significant prognostic factors for survival.

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy with cisplatin, carboplatin, and methotrexate is feasible but offers no advantage over other combinations with cisplatin and methotrexate in treating metastatic urothelial cell cancer. It is important to select patients for treatment carefully, and further studies of prognostic factors in these patients are warranted.

An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group phase II trial of trimetrexate in the treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Trimetrexate is an antifol that differs from methotrexate in ways that may be clinically important. Because methotrexate has activity in advanced bladder cancer, this trial was initiated.

METHODS

Ambulatory patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma were treated with the nonclassic antifol trimetrexate at the intravenous dose of 8 mg/m2 daily for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks (4 mg/m2 daily for 5 consecutive days for patients with creatinine levels greater than 1.6 mg/dl).

RESULTS

Of the 48 patients in the study, one had a complete response and seven had partial responses, for an overall response rate of 17% (exact 95% confidence interval, 7-30%). The response rate in patients who had received prior methotrexate was 18%, suggesting lack of complete cross-resistance. Toxicity was manageable and primarily mucosal, gastrointestinal, and myelosuppressive.

CONCLUSIONS

Trimetrexate has as much activity as other single agents in advanced urothelial carcinoma. Combination therapy, possibly with cisplatin, platinum analogs, or other antifols, using trimetrexate should be studied.

Bladder cancer: advances in biology and treatment

Integrating systemic chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with invasive bladder cancer is essential to improve survival because the majority of deaths are from systemic relapse. However, as experience with invasive tumors evolves, it is clear that treatment recommendations need to be tailored to an individual patient based on metastatic risk and, ideally, sensitivity to treatment. For those with tumors that do not extend through the bladder wall, standard therapy remains radical surgery. Nevertheless, encouraging results are being reported with increasing frequency using strategies designed to preserve bladder function through a variety of means. Crucial to the recommendation of a specific approach for an individual is improving our ability to define prognosis prior to initiating treatment. Patients with a high risk of systemic recurrence generally require chemotherapy, although the optimal route of integration, pre vs. post-operatively, remains controversial. In those patients who require it, chemotherapy can be administered more safely with the concomitant administration of hematopoietic growth factors. These factors alone, however, are unlikely to improve overall survival. Crucial to the latter effort will be the identification of more active agents, improving our understanding of intrinsic and acquired resistance to chemotherapy, and better delivery of the chemotherapeutic agents currently available. Of equal importance, is the enrollment of patients in clinical trials. These can include large scale randomized comparisons with using a survival end-point, as well as new therapies in high risk populations. The latter would include patients with advanced T3b, T4 and N+ disease, with a high risk of metastatic failure, and low complete response proportions to presently available regimens.

Carboplatin, methotrexate, vinblastine and epirubicin (Carbo-MVE) for transitional cell bladder carcinoma

BACKGROUND

MVAC is considered the most effective chemotherapy regimen for transitional cell bladder carcinoma. However, due to its significant toxic effects we substituted carboplatin for cisplatin and epirubicin for adriamycin in an attempt to produce the same response with less toxicity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-seven patients with invasive transitional cell bladder carcinoma received Carbo-MVE: carboplatin (300 mgr/m2 d2), methotrexate (30 mgr/m2 d1, 15, 22), vinblastine (3 mgr/m2 d2, 15, 22) and epirubicin (30 mgr/m2 d2) every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

There were 2 complete clinical responses (8.4%), 5 partial clinical responses (20.8%), 8 stabilizations (33.3%) and 9 progressions (37.5%). The overall clinical response rate was 29.2% (11%-47.4%, 95% CI), but 2 partial clinical remissions were not pathologically confirmed; were they to be considered as non-responses the response rate would fall even lower (20.8%). Toxicity was moderately severe, with 77.8% developing WHO grade III-IV granulocytopenia, 22.2% grade III-IV thrombocytopenia and 59.3% grade II-III vomiting. There were no toxic deaths nor any renal toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that Carbo-MVE is less active and at least as hematotoxic as multiagent CDDP-based regimens.

Carboplatin and 5-fluorouracil in poor performance status patients with advanced urothelial cancer

BACKGROUND

In view of the difficulties in administering aggressive treatment to elderly patients, frequently with concomitant medical problems, a treatment program with the combination of carboplatin and 5-FU for advanced urothelial tumors was designed. The aim was to maintain an efficacious therapeutic schedule while minimizing toxicity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-three patients with advanced bidimensionally measurable urothelial carcinoma were given carboplatin 100 mg/m2 and 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2 days 1-3 which was escalated to carboplatin 125 mg/m2 and 5-fluorouracil 625 mg/m2. 5 patients were > 70 years, the ECOG performance status was 2-3 in 10 patients (43%), and the creatinine was > 2.0 mg/dl in 3 patients (13%). Five patients (22%) had pre-existing cardiac disease, and 1 had hepatopathy. Nine patients (39%) had prior cisplatin.

RESULTS

Ten patients remained at level 1, and 12 others had the dosage escalated to level 2. Twenty-one patients are evaluable for response. Response was observed in 5 of 21 (24%) evaluable patients (95% confidence limits 15%-33%), only at dose level 2. There was 1 CR (5%) and 4 PR (19%). There were no responses in patients who had prior DDP versus 5 of 13 (38%) responses in patients who had not had prior DDP. The median time to response was 2 months. The median duration of response was 8 months. At level 2 myelotoxicity was significant, and led to a return to level 1 in 2 patients. Nine of 12 patients (75%) treated at level 2 had grade 3 leukopenia, and 1 patient had nadir sepsis. 4 patients (33%) had grade 4 thrombocytopenia.

CONCLUSIONS

Moderate activity was shown with this regimen in untreated patients at level 2. This regimen presents a feasible outpatient alternative for patients who are unable to undergo more aggressive chemotherapy.