Urinary diversion: anastomosis of the ureters into a sigmoid pouch and end-to-side sigmoidorectostomy

Neoplasia after ureterosigmoidostomy

PURPOSE

The occurrence of neoplasia after ureterosigmoidostomy is well-documented in the literature. Because of its rarity, few general surgeons will gain significant exposure to this entity, and colorectal surgeons are likely to be involved with the care of these patients. The purpose of this article is to apprise colorectal surgeons about the management of neoplasia after ureterosigmoidostomy and to familiarize them with the unique anatomy of the reconstructed pelvis.

METHODS

We performed a MEDLINE search to identify articles on ureterosigmoid tumors. The theories regarding the cause and pathology of these tumors were critically analyzed. A consensus was developed for screening patients with ureterosigmoidostomy and for treatment of neoplasia.

RESULTS

The incidence of carcinoma after ureterosigmoidostomy ranges from 2 to 15 percent. Polyps are more common, and it seems that these tumors also follow the sequence of adenocarcinoma that is seen in the common variety of colorectal neoplasia. Neoplastic changes begin with the interaction of urine and feces and the healing colonic mucosa. Both production of nitrosamines by the action of bacteria on urine and DNA damage caused by reactive oxygen radicals produced by neutrophils at the healing anastomosis have been implicated in the pathogenesis of neoplasia. The latent period between formation of ureterosigmoidostomy and the appearance of carcinoma is between 20 and 26 years. Obstructive urinary symptoms that develop more than two years after ureterosigmoidostomy should be viewed with suspicion. The patient should be investigated with a CT scan and colonoscopy, and a barium enema may be required to delineate the anatomy further. If a benign tumor is encountered during colonoscopy, it may be removed by snare polypectomy. For a malignant tumor the segment of colon with ureteric implants should be excised, along with its lymphatic drainage. Bowel continuity is restored primarily, and the ureters are implanted in an ileal conduit.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with ureterosigmoidostomy should be followed closely for the rest of their lives. The aim of screening is to identify and treat neoplasia before malignancy develops. Furthermore, early detection of neoplasia by close screening will improve survival. Although urine cytology and occult blood are inexpensive tests, colonoscopy remains the criterion standard for follow-up of these patients. Annual colonoscopic surveillance should be started soon after the ureterosigmoidostomy but not later than five to six years after the procedure. Patients who are noncompliant with the vigorous follow-up schedule should be offered the option of resection of the colonic segment at risk with urinary diversion.

Carcinogenesis. The fate of intestinal segments used in urinary reconstruction

The actual mechanism for risk of developing cancer in intestinal segments used for urinary diversion remains uncertain. The clinical and laboratory experiences are reviewed in this article. The pathogenesis is multifaceted, involving initiators and promoters of carcinogenesis. Molecular genetic technology may provide the key to decoding the mechanisms involved.

Detubularized isolated ureterosigmoidostomy: description of a new technique and preliminary results

PURPOSE

A technique is described to improve the evacuation pattern and, accordingly, the life-style of patients with ureterosigmoidostomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An inverted U-shaped sigmoid colon is detubularized, and the left colon is fixed in continuity to the posterior wall of the rectal ampulla in line with the anorectal canal. The ureters are reimplanted into the sigmoid pouch using the nipple technique.

RESULTS

All 15 patients followed for 3 to 18 months postoperatively passed clear urine and solid feces separately, with good anal control and at convenient periods (urine 3 to 6 times and solid feces once daily). Urographic studies showed stabilization of renal morphology in 26 units, improved function in 3 and deterioration in 1. Dynamic study of the rectum in 3 patients showed a capacious rectosigmoid reservoir with low pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

The technique of detubularized isolated ureterosigmoidostomy has important advantages over conventional ureterosigmoidostomy. Patients pass urine and feces separately and at convenient intervals with good anal control. The upper urinary tract is well preserved, and there is potentially less risk of colonic carcinogenesis.

The Mainz pouch II (sigma rectum pouch)

A low pressure rectosigmoid reservoir for urine is created obviating the need for colostomy, augmentation or extensive bowel surgery. Antimesenteric splitting of the intestine at the rectosigmoid junction and subsequent side-to-side anastomosis are performed. Urodynamic data demonstrate that the detubularization is effective in rendering high pressure bowel contractions ineffective. Without the risk of damaging the mesentery the pouch is fixed at the promontory, which lessens the risk of ureteral kinking and upper urinary tract dilatation. The technique is indicated not only in cases of failed ureterosigmoidostomy but also for primary urinary diversion. All 47 patients who underwent the operation were evaluable with a followup of 1 to 20 months (mean 10 months). All patients are continent during the daytime with a mean emptying frequency of 5 times. All but 1 elderly woman are dry at night with a mean frequency of 1 episode. With the reservoir full the basal pressure was 24 cm. water and the highest peak pressure recorded was 35 cm. water. The low pressure improves continence, protects the upper urinary tract and even allows dilated ureters to be implanted.

Ureterosigmoidostomy

After a brief review of the main ureterosigmoidostomy techniques, the Authors evaluate their own experience based on 116 patients operated between 1969 and 1987. The early and late complications of this procedure have been analyzed, in particular those regarding the state of the upper urinary tracts, hyperchloremic acidosis, colonic neoplasms, renal stones and proctitis. The Authors conclude that ureterosigmoidostomy still seems to have a well-defined role among urinary diversion possibilities that may be offered to patients (in particular women).

Urinary diversion to the augmented and valved rectum: preliminary results with a novel surgical procedure

A new method for urinary diversion to the rectum was elaborated in animal experiments and currently has been used in 19 patients. Reflux of the rectal content to the colon and to the upper urinary tract is prevented by the fashioning of an intussusception valve at the rectosigmoid junction. The rectum is augmented by anastomosing an ileal patch to the anterior rectal wall. A transverse colostomy protects the construction for 6 to 8 weeks. Of the 19 patients 3 had local recurrence or metastasis within 6 months. Thus, 16 patients with a followup of 3 to 14 months are evaluable. All patients are continent during the daytime with an emptying frequency of 3 to 5 times and dry at night with a frequency of 0 to 2. In 3 patients partial sliding of the sigmoid intussusception valve occurred causing reflux of rectal contents to the sigmoid and to the right ureter in 1. Reflux to the upper urinary tract has not been revealed in any of the other patients. With 1 exception excretory urography has demonstrated either improvement or stabilization of the upper urinary tract post-operatively. The rectal capacity increased from 200 to 700 ml. after 6 months. With the reservoir full the mean basal pressure was 17 cm. water and the mean maximum pressure was 24 cm. water.