Comparison of blood pressure responses to intra-arterial and intra-venous injections of angiotensin I, angiotensin II and bradykinin

Ranakinestatin-PPF from the skin secretion of the Fukien gold-striped pond frog, Pelophylax plancyi fukienensis: a prototype of a novel class of bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist peptide from ranid frogs

The defensive skin secretions of many amphibians are a rich source of bradykinins and bradykinin-related peptides (BRPs). Members of this peptide group are also common components of reptile and arthropod venoms due to their multiple biological functions that include induction of pain, effects on many smooth muscle types, and lowering systemic blood pressure. While most BRPs are bradykinin receptor agonists, some have curiously been found to be exquisite antagonists, such as the maximakinin gene-related peptide, kinestatin—a specific bradykinin B₂-receptor antagonist from the skin of the giant fire-bellied toad, Bombina maxima. Here, we describe the identification, structural and functional characterization of a heptadecapeptide (DYTIRTRLHQGLSRKIV), named ranakinestatin-PPF, from the skin of the Chinese ranid frog, Pelophylax plancyi fukienensis, representing a prototype of a novel class of bradykinin B₂-receptor specific antagonist. Using a preconstricted preparation of rat tail arterial smooth muscle, a single dose of 10⁻⁶ M of the peptide effectively inhibited the dose-dependent relaxation effect of bradykinin between 10⁻¹¹ M and 10⁻⁵ M and subsequently, this effect was pharmacologically-characterized using specific bradykinin B₁- (desArg-HOE140) and B₂-receptor (HOE140) antagonists; the data from which demonstrated that the antagonism of the novel peptide was mediated through B₂-receptors. Ranakinestatin—PPF—thus represents a prototype of an amphibian skin peptide family that functions as a bradykinin B₂-receptor antagonist herein demonstrated using mammalian vascular smooth muscle.

Antidipsogenic effects of eel bradykinins in the eel Anguilla japonica

A peptide with bradykinin (BK)-like immunoreactivity was isolated from an incubate of heat-denatured eel plasma with porcine pancreatic kallikrein. The purified peptide had the following amino acid sequence: Arg-Arg-Pro-Pro-Gly-Ser-Trp-Pro-Leu-Arg. This decapeptide, named eel [Arg(0)]BK, was identical to two previously identified BK homologs from cod and trout. High conservation of the BK sequence among distant teleost species suggests an important function in this vertebrate group. Bolus intra-arterial injections of eel [Arg(0)]BK, BK, and [Arg(0)]-des-Arg(9)-BK (1-10 nmol/kg) caused significant (P < 0.05) inhibition of drinking in seawater-adapted eels. The potency of the inhibition was ranked in the following order: [Arg(0)]BK > [Arg(0)]-des-Arg(9)-BK = BK. The BK peptides also produced an immediate, transient increase followed by a sustained increase in arterial blood pressure and an initial decrease followed by an increase in heart rate. Strong tachyphylaxis occurred for the cardiovascular effect but not for the antidipsogenic effect. The order of the potency of the cardiovascular actions, [Arg(0)]BK > BK > [Arg(0)]-des-Arg(9)-BK, was different from that of the antidipsogenic action. Slow infusions of eel [Arg(0)]BK in the dose range 1-1,000 pmol x kg(-1) x min(-1) produced concentration-dependent inhibition of drinking without changes in arterial pressure, plasma osmolality, and hematocrit. At the infusion rate of >100 pmol x kg(-1) x min(-1), plasma concentrations of angiotensin II, a potent dipsogenic hormone in eels, increased, suggesting an interaction of the kallikrein-kinin and renin-angiotensin systems. In mammals, BK is dipsogenic and vasodepressor, so that our data demonstrate opposite effects on fluid and cardiovascular regulation of BK in the eel and suggest a new physiological role for the kallikrein-kinin system in teleost fish.

Cardiovascular responses to angiotensins I and II in normotensive and hypertensive rats; effects of NO synthase inhibition or ET receptor antagonism

1. We compared the cardiovascular responses to angiotensins (I and II), and any possible modulatory influences thereupon of nitric oxide (NO) or endothelin (ET) in conscious male, normotensive, Hannover Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats, and hypertensive, heterozygous ((mRen-2)27), transgenic (TG) rats. 2. The pressor effects of angiotensin I or of angiotensin II were not consistently different in SD and TG rats. The accompanying absolute reductions in renal and mesenteric vascular conductances were smaller in TG rats, but probably due to the baseline vasoconstriction in those animals. 3. Inhibition of NO synthase with L-NAME had no significant effects on the pressor responses to angiotensin I or angiotensin II in either SD or TG rats. L-NAME reduced the absolute, but not percentage, reductions in renal and mesenteric vascular conductances in response to angiotensin I and angiotensin II. L-NAME abolished the hindquarters vasodilator effects of angiotensin I and angiotensin II in both strains of rat. 4. ET receptor antagonism (with SB209670) had no significant influence on the pressor or renal or mesenteric vasoconstrictor effects of angiotensin II in SD rats. In TG rats, the pressor responses to angiotensin II were unaffected by SB209670; the accompanying falls in renal and mesenteric vascular conductances were enhanced in absolute, but not in percentage terms. 5. These results provide no evidence for a buffering action of NO, or a modulatory influence of ET, on the pressor or vasoconstrictor effects of angiotensin I and/or angiotensin II in SD rats. Furthermore, there is no evidence for an altered sensitivity to angiotensin I or angiotensin II, and no evidence for a differential modulatory influence of either NO or ET in TG, compared to SD, rats.