Proposal for a collaborative approach to clinical teaching

An introduction to the TPSN model: a comprehensive approach to reducing the theory-practice gap in nursing

Background

There are still concerns about the effectiveness of clinical education models which are done with the aim of reducing the theoretical-practical gap in nursing. In this article, we intend to describe an innovative model to create an integration and structured relationship between educational and healthcare provider institutions. The basis of this work is the full-time presence of nursing teacher in the clinical settings and the development of their role to improve the education of students and nurses and the quality of nursing services.

Methods

This was a participatory action research. This action research was implemented in four steps of problem identification, planning, action and reflection. Interviews, focus groups and observation were used for the qualitative part. Clinical Learning Environment Inventory (CLEI), Job Satisfaction in Nursing Instrument questionnaires and Patient Satisfaction with Nursing Care Quality Questionnaire were completed before and after the study. Qualitative content analysis, paired and independent t test were used for data analysis.

Results

The academic-practice integration Model of TPSN is a dynamic and interactive model for accountability in nursing Discipline. Unlike the medical education model that includes patients, students, and physicians as the three points of a triangle, this model, which is shaped like a large triangle, places the person in need of care and treatment (patient, client, family, or society) in the center of the triangle, aiming to focus on the healthcare receiver. The model consists of three components (Mentoring component, Preceptorship component, and integrated clinical education component). Each of the components of this model alone will not be able to eliminate the ultimate goal of bridging the theory-practice gap.

Conclusions

A new and innovative model was proposed to reduce the theory-practice gap in the present study. This model increases the collaboration between educational institutions and healthcare settings compared with the previous models. The TPSN model helps students, nurses, and nursing instructors integrate theoretical knowledge with clinical practice and act as professional nurses.

Effective Methods of Clinical Education

OBJECTIVE

To provide an overview of key points and helpful tips related to engaging learners in different medical education settings including the virtual education environment.

DATA SOURCES

Searches were conducted in PubMed and Google Scholar for articles and review papers on the topic of Medical Education.

STUDY SELECTIONS

There was a focus on articles which reviewed best practices on a variety of topics related to medical education.

RESULTS

Medical Education is a critical part of any students or trainees' curriculum in their education/training program. There are different settings where medical education is provided, and both general and type specific best practices that can be considered. Those who spend time in medical education are continuously working on innovative ideas to enhance and improve how educators teach in both large and small group settings. More recently the presenter must also consider if the event will occur in a live or virtual setting as e-learning has become more popular, and at times required, which has both benefits and challenges in medical education.

CONCLUSION

It is the responsibility of all of those who work in medical education to provide interactive and engaging education to learners at all levels of training.

Clinical Teaching: An Evidence-based Guide to Best Practices from the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors

Clinical teaching is the primary educational tool use to train learners from day one of medical school all the way to the completion of fellowship. However, concerns over time constraints and patient census have led to a decline in bedside teaching. This paper provides a critical review of the literature on clinical teaching with a focus on instructor teaching strategies, clinical teaching models, and suggestions for incorporating technology. Recommendations for instructor-related teaching factors include adequate preparation, awareness of effective teacher attributes, using evidence-based-knowledge dissemination strategies, ensuring good communication, and consideration of environmental factors. Proposed recommendations for potential teaching strategies include the Socratic method, the One-Minute Preceptor model, SNAPPS, ED STAT, teaching scripts, and bedside presentation rounds. Additionally, this article will suggest approaches to incorporating technology into clinical teaching, including just-in-time training, simulation, and telemedical teaching. This paper provides readers with strategies and techniques for improving clinical teaching effectiveness.

Enhancing Operative Feedback: A Descriptive Trajectory for Surgical Development in Otolaryngology

OBJECTIVE

Developmental frameworks are narrative descriptions of learner performance that may be useful to provide operative feedback tools in surgical education. The authors previously proposed the Technician, Anatomist, Anticipator, Strategist, Executive (TAASE) framework utilizing data collected from general surgeons and conjectured its applicability in other surgical specialties. Here, we construct a developmental framework in otolaryngology using similar techniques, then compare the results to TAASE.

DESIGN

Ten otolaryngology educators participated in semi-structured, audio-recorded interviews, to explore how otolaryngology faculty characterize surgical learning at different levels of training. Researchers analyzed the transcripts using a thematic analysis approach to build a developmental framework. Results were then qualitatively compared to the TAASE trajectory.

SETTING

Single tertiary academic medical center.

PARTICIPANTS

Faculty within the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

RESULTS

Otolaryngology faculty characterized surgical development as an integrated trajectory of technical and cognitive skills progressing from specific operative tasks to a global understanding of patients and procedures largely consistent with stages outlined in the Technician, Anatomist, Anticipator, Strategist, and Executive model. A new theme identified was learner emotions, which may impact learning and hinder or enhance progression along the trajectory.

CONCLUSIONS

Otolaryngology and general surgeons agree upon a common arc to operative maturity reflected by the TAASE trajectory. The TAASE framework may be useful as a tool for intraoperative assessment in otolaryngology to help promote quality feedback. Further research is needed to understand how emotions may influence operative skill development.

A Day in the Life of an Internal Medicine Resident - A Time Study: What Is Changed from First to Third Year?

BACKGROUND

In the past decade, internal medicine residencies have undergone major changes in competency-based assessments, work-hour restrictions and the implementation of the electronic medical record. The aim of this study is to compare a typical day of a first year post-graduate (PGY1) to that of a third year post-graduate (PGY3) internal medicine resident and examine if the differences in their days demonstrate the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM) desired progression towards competency-based milestones and unsupervised practice.

METHODS

We conducted an observational time study documenting 14,103 minutes, 9 major categories, and 17 subcategories while shadowing 10 internal medicine PGY1s and 10 PGY3s during inpatient, non-call days. The following day, house staff completed surveys of their perceived time allocation of the previous 24 hours.

RESULTS

PGY1s spent an average of 12.5 hours managing an average of 6 patients. Thirty-eight percent of their time was spent on the computer, 21% discussing patients and 18% directly with patients. PGY3s, overseeing an average of 12 patients, worked 1.5 hours less per day (p<0.001), had 1.5 hours less computer time (p=0.001), 24 minutes less direct patient contact (p=0.045), and 36 minutes more patient care discussions (p=0.011).

CONCLUSION

The difference between PGY1s' and PGY3s' daily time allocations is minimal. Whereas a PGY3 spends 1.5 hours less than a PGY1 on writing computer notes and discharges, they also work 1.5 hours less per day. The additional 36 minutes of patient care discussions was the only significant time quantity difference that would be considered a higher level of practice for the PGY3 compared to the PGY1. With residents now caring for fewer patients, there has been a marked increase in computer time per patient for both PGY1s and PGY3s.

The challenge of planning learning opportunities for clinical medicine: a triangulation study in Iran

BACKGROUND

An essential characteristics of clinical education is the need to learn a large number of practical and communication skills along with theoretical knowledge. It is challenging to design learning opportunities (LOs) for clinical setting. We aimed to determine optimal learning opportunities from the viewpoint of Medical curriculum planners, to determine the gap between the current condition and the optimal condition in medical schools, and to present feasible tactic for clinical learning opportunities.

METHODS

This study comprised of three sub-studies and was conducted using triangulation. The first sub-study was performed using the Modified Delphi method with a view to identifying optimal learning opportunities. Data was collected by online focus group discussion and a questionnaire. The second sub-study was conducted with the aim of comparing the current condition and the optimal condition. Data was collected from nine medical schools across Iran using a checklist, available documents, observation, and interview. The third sub-study was conducted using an expert panel comprising of seven curriculum planners of the M.D.

PROGRAM

The goal of this phase was to provide feasible tactic to improve clinical education in medical schools.

RESULTS

In the first sub-study, the participants determined all items, including student-centered learning, non-threatening learning environment, and record and management system of clinical learning opportunities as implementable learning opportunities with over 70% consensus. However, in the second sub-study, student-centered teaching methods were practiced in 33% of medical schools and the non-threatening learning environment in 67% of the schools, while the record and management system of learning opportunities was not launched in any of the schools. From the viewpoint of the expert panel members, learning opportunities adapted to clinical contents, specification of content-based learning opportunities, and continuous supervision on learners to achieve the expected learning outcomes were among clinical learning opportunities with over 70% consensus.

CONCLUSIONS

Student-centered clinical learning practices, together with virtual learning methods, can lead to clinical enhancement. Opportunities such as interactive and participatory practices should gain further consideration. Also assigning responsibility to learners and monitoring them are strategies for enhancement.

Deliberate teaching tools for clinical teaching encounters: A critical scoping review and thematic analysis to establish definitional clarity

PURPOSE AND METHOD

We conducted a scoping review of tools designed to add structure to clinical teaching, with a thematic analysis to establish definitional clarity.

RESULTS

Six thousand and forty nine citations were screened, 434 reviewed for eligibility, and 230 identified as meeting study inclusion criteria. Eighty-nine names and 51 definitions were identified. Based on a post facto thematic analysis, we propose that these tools be named "deliberate teaching tools" (DTTs) and defined as "frameworks that enable clinicians to have a purposeful and considered approach to teaching encounters by incorporating elements identified with good teaching practice." We identified 46 DTTs in the literature, with 38 (82.6%) originally described for the medical setting. Forty justification articles consisted of 16 feedback surveys, 13 controlled trials, seven pre-post intervention studies with no control group, and four observation studies. Current evidence of efficacy is not entirely conclusive, and many studies contain methodology flaws. Forty-nine clarification articles comprised 12 systematic reviews and 37 narrative reviews. The most number of DTTs described by any review was four. A common design theme was identified in approximately three-quarters of DTTs.

CONCLUSIONS

Applicability of DTTs to specific alternate settings should be considered in context, and appropriately designed justification studies are warranted to demonstrate efficacy.

Strategic Questioning in Emergency Medicine Training

Strategic questioning is a technique that can enhance the unique learning environment of emergency medicine (EM) training. By incorporating this into the routine expert-learner encounters of daily practice, it can be used to engage learners, explore their knowledge base, probe for gaps, encourage development, and grow critical thinking skills. We propose that this become routinely used in EM training as a tool to strengthen residency education.

Safe and Collaborative Communication Skills: A Step towards Mental Health Nurses Implementing Trauma Informed Care

Trauma Informed Care (TIC) acknowledges the presence and effects of trauma in the lives of many mental health service users and the responsibility of services to provide physical and emotional safety. One challenge of TIC is a lack of clarity about translating the philosophy into practice. This paper describes the delivery and evaluation of a trauma informed communication workshop for mental health nurses that aimed to increase their knowledge of the potential impacts of trauma on consumers, and translate TIC concepts into their communication approaches within the therapeutic relationship.

Associations between teaching effectiveness and participant self-reflection in continuing medical education

Effective medical educators can engage learners through self-reflection. However, little is known about the relationships between teaching effectiveness and self-reflection in continuing medical education (CME). We aimed to determine associations between presenter teaching effectiveness and participant self-reflection in conference-based CME. This cross-sectional study evaluated presenters and participants at a national CME course. Participants provided CME teaching effectiveness (CMETE) ratings and self-reflection scores for each presentation. Overall CMETE and CME self-reflection scores (five-point Likert scale with one as strongly disagree and five as strongly agree) were averaged for each presentation. Correlations were measured among self-reflection, CMETE, and presentation characteristics. In total, 624 participants returned 430 evaluations (response, 68.9%) for the 38 presentations. Correlation between CMETE and self-reflection was medium (Pearson correlation, 0.3-0.5) or large (0.5-1.0) for most presentations (n = 33, 86.9%). Higher mean (SD) CME reflection scores were associated with clinical cases (3.66 [0.12] vs. 3.48 [0.14]; p = 0.003) and audience response (3.66 [0.12] vs. 3.51 [0.14]; p = 0.005). To our knowledge, this is the first study to show a relationship between teaching effectiveness and participant self-reflection in conference-based CME. Presenters should consider using clinical cases and audience response systems to increase teaching effectiveness and promote self-reflection among CME learners.

Twelve tips on writing a discussion case that facilitates teaching and engages learners

The authors share twelve practical tips on writing a case that engages learners in active learning and discussion. They first advise that, during the initial preparation of the case, authors should (1) identify the case goals and objectives, and (2) identify the level of the learners. When writing the case, authors should (3) use active and colorful language; (4) use patients' own descriptions rather than medical language; (5) allow the learners to interpret data themselves; (6) allow for natural discovery rather than presenting information chronologically; and (7) be realistic about interruptions in patient care. In addition, case authors should pay attention to methods that enhance discussion by (8) creating barriers to diagnostic or treatment options; (9) promoting questions and discussion over answers; (10) using cues to assure discussion flow and knowledge exploration; and (11) omitting details or inserting informational distractors. Finally, well-crafted questions are essential during the case presentation to engage learners in higher-order thinking; and to (12) stimulate curiosity and reflection.

Intraoperative questioning to advance higher-order thinking

BACKGROUND

The type of question asked elicits a particular response. The purpose of this study was to determine what types and levels of questions were asked in the operating room. These insights are important for understanding how questions are used to advance learners.

METHODS

12 laparoscopic cholecystectomy operations were observed and recorded at a single institution. Intraoperative questions asked by faculty were transcribed for all cases. Using revised Bloom's taxonomy, questions were classified into one of 5 levels: (1) remembering, (2) understanding, (3) applying, (4) analyzing, (5) evaluating.

RESULTS

141 questions were asked by faculty and ranged from 0 to 34 questions per case. Classification of questions showed there were 43 remembering, 29 understanding, 47 applying, 13 analyzing, and 8 evaluating questions asked.

CONCLUSIONS

Questioning was predominately classified at lower-order and mid-level thinking skills (120/141). Integrating intraoperative questions at higher-order levels has the potential to guide trainees into progressively complex thinking and decision making.

Effective Communication Barriers in Clinical Teaching among Malaysian Medical Students in Zagazig Faculty of Medicine (Egypt)

Introduction

effective communication in a clinical environment plays a vital role in patient assessment and treatment. The aim of this study was to understand the experiences of Malaysian medical students concerning communication barriers during clinical practice. The goal was to provide answers for three important research questions, i.e., 1) Are communication barriers an impediment to Malaysian students during clinical teaching? 2) What is the nature of the language barriers that the students encounter? and 3) What are the best ways of reducing these barriers during clinical teaching?

Methods

The qualitative method was used to conduct the research, and open-ended questionnaires were used to collect the data. The study was conducted on 95 fourth-, fifth-, and sixth-year students, 80% of whom completed the study.

Results

Medical students from Malaysia who have limited knowledge of the Arabic language experience some difficulties in communicating with staff members, patients, and nurses during their clinical practices.

Conclusion

Successful orientation of students to the language used in the clinical environment will help the students overcome the communication barriers they encounter during their clinical practices.

From novice to master surgeon: improving feedback with a descriptive approach to intraoperative assessment

BACKGROUND

A developmental and descriptive approach to assessing trainee intraoperative performance was explored.

METHODS

Semistructured interviews with 20 surgeon educators were recorded, transcribed, deidentified, and analyzed using a grounded theory approach to identify emergent themes. Two researchers independently coded the transcripts. Emergent themes were also compared to existing theories of skill acquisition.

RESULTS

Surgeon educators characterized intraoperative surgical performance as an integrated practice of multiple skill categories and included anticipating, planning for contingencies, monitoring progress, self-efficacy, and "working knowledge." Comments concerning progression through stages, broadly characterized as "technician," "anatomist," "anticipator," "strategist," and "executive," formed a narrative about each stage of development.

CONCLUSIONS

The developmental trajectory with narrative, descriptive profiles of surgeons working toward mastery provide a standardized vocabulary for communicating feedback, while fostering reflection on trainee progress. Viewing surgical performance as integrated practice rather than the conglomerate of isolated skills enhances authentic assessment.

Associations between teaching effectiveness scores and characteristics of presentations in hospital medicine continuing education

BACKGROUND

There is little research regarding characteristics of effective continuing medical education (CME) presentations in hospital medicine (HM). Therefore, we sought to identify associations between validated CME teaching effectiveness scores and characteristics of CME presentations in the field of HM.

DESIGN/SETTING

This was a cross-sectional study of participants and didactic presentations from a national HM CME course in 2014.

MEASUREMENTS

Participants provided CME teaching effectiveness (CMETE) ratings using an instrument with known validity evidence. Overall CMETE scores (5-point scale: 1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree) were averaged for each presentation, and associations between scores and presentation characteristics were determined using the Kruskal-Wallis test. The threshold for statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 277 out of 368 participants (75.3%) completed evaluations for the 32 presentations. CMETE scores (mean [standard deviation]) were significantly associated with the use of audience response (4.64 [0.16]) versus no audience response (4.49 [0.16]; P = 0.01), longer presentations (≥30 minutes: 4.67 [0.13] vs <30 minutes: 4.51 [0.18]; P = 0.02), and larger number of slides (≥50: 4.66 [0.17] vs <50: 4.55 [0.17]; P = 0.04). There were no significant associations between CMETE scores and use of clinical cases, defined goals, or summary slides.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first study regarding associations between validated teaching effectiveness scores and characteristics of effective CME presentations in HM. Our findings, which support previous research in other fields, indicate that CME presentations may be improved by increasing interactivity through the use of audience response systems and allowing longer presentations.

Success of a Faculty Development Program for Teachers at the Mayo Clinic

BACKGROUND

There has been limited research on the improvement of underperforming clinical teachers.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a faculty development program could improve the evaluations of clinical teachers in an internal medicine residency program.

METHODS

A total of 123 teachers completed faculty development at the Mayo Clinic from 2009 to 2012. The faculty enhancement and education development program (FEED) consists of 6 interactive, small group, 2-hour sessions taught by experienced Mayo Clinic faculty over 1 year. These sessions address the following competencies: asking questions, diagnosing learners, giving feedback, using teaching frameworks, recognizing learning styles, and providing clinical supervision. Resident-of-faculty Mayo teaching effectiveness (MTE) scores have previously demonstrated content, internal structure, and criterion validity. Teachers were grouped into the top 80% or the bottom 20%, according to baseline MTE scores. Mixed linear models were used to compare these groups regarding changes in MTE scores after completion of FEED. Results were adjusted for teacher age, sex, medical specialty, academic rank, and teaching awards.

RESULTS

For all participants combined, the adjusted MTE scores (mean; standard error) improved from baseline (3.80; 0.04) to completion of FEED (3.93; 0.04; P < .001). However, the bottom 20% had a significantly greater improvement in scores than the top 80% (score-change difference  =  0.166, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

We describe a low-intensity faculty development intervention that benefited all clinical teachers, but was particularly effective for underperforming teachers in internal medicine. The approach may be suitable for adoption or adaptation in other graduate medical education programs.

Motivational interviewing as a pedagogical approach in behavioral science education: "walking the talk"

Motivational Interviewing (MI) is an evidence-based approach to facilitating behavior change. This approach has been applied in multiple settings (e.g., healthcare, drug and alcohol treatment, psychotherapy, health and wellness coaching, etc.). This article applies MI in a pedagogical context with medical residents as a semi-directive, learner-centered teaching style for eliciting clinical behavior change. Herein we present the foundational theories that inform this approach, describe the process of teaching, address barriers and challenges, and conclude with a review of performance to date including residents' narrative accounts of their experience with the curriculum.

Development and psychometric characteristics of a new domain of the stanford faculty development program instrument

INTRODUCTION

Teacher's attitude domain, a pivotal aspect of clinical teaching, is missing in the Stanford Faculty Development Program Questionnaire (SFDPQ), the most widely used student-based assessment method of clinical teaching skills. This study was conducted to develop and validate the teacher's attitude domain and evaluate the validity and internal consistency reliability of the augmented SFDPQ.

METHODS

Items generated for the new domain included teacher's enthusiasm, sobriety, humility, thoroughness, empathy, and accessibility. The study involved 20 resident doctors assessed once by 64 medical students using the augmented SFDPQ. Construct validity was explored using correlation among the different domains and a global rating scale. Factor analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The response rate was 94%. The new domain had a Cronbach's alpha of 0.89, with 1-factor solution explaining 57.1% of its variance. It showed the strongest correlation to the global rating scale (rho = 0.71). The augmented SFDPQ, which had a Cronbach's alpha of 0.93, correlated better (rho = 0.72, p < 0.00001) to the global rating scale than the original SFDPQ (rho = 0.67, p < 0.00001).

DISCUSSION

The new teacher's attitude domain exhibited good internal consistency and construct and factorial validity. It enhanced the content and construct validity of the SFDPQ. The validated construct of the augmented SFDPQ is recommended for design and evaluation of basic and continuing clinical teaching programs.

Clinical teaching based on principles of cognitive apprenticeship: views of experienced clinical teachers

PURPOSE

To explore (1) whether an instructional model based on principles of cognitive apprenticeship fits with the practice of experienced clinical teachers and (2) which factors influence clinical teaching during clerkships from an environmental, teacher, and student level as perceived by the clinical teachers themselves. The model was designed to apply directly to teaching behaviors of clinical teachers and consists of three phases, advocating teaching behaviors such as modeling, creating a safe learning environment, coaching, knowledge articulation, and exploration.

METHOD

A purposive sample of 17 experienced clinical teachers from five different disciplines and four different teaching hospitals took part in semistructured individual interviews. Two researchers independently performed a thematic analysis of the interview transcripts. Coding was discussed within the research team until consensus was reached.

RESULTS

All participants recognized the theoretical model as a structured picture of the practice of teaching activities during both regular and senior clerkships. According to participants, modeling and creating a safe learning environment were fundamental to the learning process of both regular and senior clerkship students. Division of teaching responsibilities, longer rotations, and proactive behavior of teachers and students ensured that teachers were able to apply all steps in the model.

CONCLUSIONS

The theoretical model can offer valuable guidance in structuring clinical teaching activities and offers suggestions for the design of effective clerkships.

Characteristics of effective clinical teachers identified by dental students: a qualitative study

This qualitative research study identified criteria for clinical teacher quality preferences as perceived by dental students. Third and fourth year dental students at New York University College of Dentistry were given a two question, open-ended survey asking what qualities they liked most and least in a clinical teacher. Responses were collected until data saturation was achieved. A total of 157 respondents provided a total of 995 written comments. Descriptive words within the responses were coded and grouped into key words, according to similar relationships, and further refined into 17 defined categories. Three core themes, Character, Competence and Communication, emerged from these 17 categories, which were validated according to specific references found in the existing educational literature. 'Character' comprised nine of the 17 defined categories: (caring, motivation, empathy, patience, professionalism, available, fairness, happiness, patient-centred) and yielded 59.1% of total student responses; 'Competence' consisted of five categories: knowledgeable, expertise, efficient, skilful, effective (29.2%); and 'Communication' represented the remaining three categories: feedback, approachable and interpersonal communication (11.7%). Positive and negative responses related to the defined category of caring were cited by 59.2% of all students. Motivation was the next highest category, cited by 45.9% of students. Non-cognitive attributes, especially those in the Character theme, comprised the majority of student comments. Because students' perceptions are so critical to understanding clinical teaching effectiveness in dental education, these findings can be used to develop assessments to measure clinical teaching effectiveness, to create criteria for the hiring and promotion of clinical faculty and to plan faculty development programming.

Effects of "Teaching Method Workshop" on general surgery residents' teaching skills

INTRODUCTION

Residents have an important role as teachers and need to know about teaching, teaching methods and skills. In developed countries, "resident-as-teacher" programs have been implemented progressively; but there is little information about this theme in developing countries such as Iran. This study aimed to determine effects of "teaching method" workshop on surgical residents' teaching skills in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this quasi-experimental study, 18 residents in 1(st), 2(nd), and 3(rd) years of surgical residency in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences have attended in a 10-hour workshop. Two questionnaires (validity and reliability) was verified: Clinical teaching self-assessment and clinical teaching evaluation was completed before and after the intervention ("teaching method" workshop) by attending residents and rater interns, respectively. Paired-samples T-test was used to analyze collecting data.

RESULTS

After intervention, Self-assessment mean scores were increased in two categories: feedback from 3.34 to 3.94 (P = 0.011) and promoting self- directed learning from 3.53 to 4.02 (P = 0.009); whereas, there was no significant differences in evaluation mean scores.

CONCLUSION

Statistical results from self-assessment and evaluation scores show little improvement in residents' teaching skills after the intervention, but residents assessed the workshop as useful. Lack of motivation in interns and little reward for residents who attend in educational activities could be responsible for these results. So, to promote role of residents' as teachers, we offer revision in residency curriculum and residents' formal duties as well as designing educational programs in teaching theme based on our needs and resources.

Effect of a video on developing skills in undergraduate nursing students for the management of totally implantable central venous access ports

BACKGROUND

Handling Totally Implantable Access Ports (TIAP) is a nursing procedure that requires skill and knowledge to avoid adverse events. No studies addressing this procedure with undergraduate students were identified prior to this study. Communication technologies, such as videos, have been increasingly adopted in the teaching of nursing and have contributed to the acquisition of competencies for clinical performance.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of a video on the puncture and heparinization of TIAP in the development of cognitive and technical competencies of undergraduate nursing students.

METHOD

Quasi-experimental study with a pretest-posttest design.

RESULTS

24 individuals participated in the study. Anxiety scores were kept at levels 1 and 2 in the pretest and posttest. In relation to cognitive knowledge concerning the procedure, the proportion of correct answers in the pretest was 0.14 (SD=0.12) and 0.90 in the posttest (SD=0.05). After watching the video, the average score obtained by the participants in the mock session was 27.20.

CONCLUSION

The use of an educational video with a simulation of puncture and heparinization of TIAP proved to be a strategy that increased both cognitive and technical knowledge. This strategy is viable in the teaching-learning process and is useful as a support tool for professors and for the development of undergraduate nursing students.

Perspective: a practical approach to defining professional practice gaps for continuing medical education

The Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education mandates that continuing medical education (CME) be developed around professional practice gaps. Accordingly, CME course directors must identify the intended learners, assess learners' needs, identify gaps in knowledge, and evaluate their CME activities. Writing gap statements is challenging for CME course directors because there is not a universally accepted format for writing these statements. The authors describe a practical approach to defining gaps for CME accreditation, which involves four steps indicated by the mnemonic LASO (learner, assessment, standard, outcomes): (1) define the learner population's characteristics, (2) create a learning needs assessment, (3) determine if the standard is met, and (4) state educational outcome for the CME activity. Based on this model, the difference between the practice standard and the current practice represents the gap in practice. The LASO approach has assisted in making CME content learner centered, relevant, and measurable at the authors' institution. The authors anticipate that LASO will be able to provide all CME course directors with a practical approach to defining educational gaps for CME accreditation.

Improving participant feedback to continuing medical education presenters in internal medicine: a mixed-methods study

BACKGROUND

Feedback is essential for improving the skills of continuing medical education (CME) presenters. However, there has been little research on improving the quality of feedback to CME presenters.

OBJECTIVES

To validate an instrument for generating balanced and behavior-specific feedback from a national cross-section of participants to presenters at a large internal medicine CME course.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A prospective, randomized validation study with qualitative data analysis that included all 317 participants at a Mayo Clinic internal medicine CME course in 2009.

MEASUREMENTS

An 8-item (5-point Likert scales) CME faculty assessment enhanced study form (ESF) was designed based on literature and expert review. Course participants were randomized to a standard form, a generic study form (GSF), or the ESF. The dimensionality of instrument scores was determined using factor analysis to account for clustered data. Internal consistency and interrater reliabilities were calculated. Associations between overall feedback scores and presenter and presentation variables were identified using generalized estimating equations to account for multiple observations within talk and speaker combinations. Two raters reached consensus on qualitative themes and independently analyzed narrative entries for evidence of balanced and behavior-specific comments.

RESULTS

Factor analysis of 5,241 evaluations revealed a uni-dimensional model for measuring CME presenter feedback. Overall internal consistency (Cronbach alpha = 0.94) and internal consistency reliability (ICC range 0.88-0.95) were excellent. Feedback scores were associated with presenters' academic ranks (mean score): Instructor (4.12), Assistant Professor (4.38), Associate Professor (4.56), Professor (4.70) (p = 0.046). Qualitative analysis revealed that the ESF generated the highest numbers of balanced comments (GSF = 11, ESF = 26; p = 0.01) and behavior-specific comments (GSF = 64, ESF = 104; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We describe a practical and validated method for generating balanced and behavior-specific feedback for CME presenters in internal medicine. Our simple method for prompting course participants to give balanced and behavior-specific comments may ultimately provide CME presenters with feedback for improving their presentations.

Resident physician well-being and assessments of their knowledge and clinical performance

BACKGROUND

Medical knowledge and clinical performance ratings are major criteria for assessing the competence of resident physicians. However, these assessments may be influenced by residents' mental health. The relationship between residents' well-being and empathy and assessments of their global performance remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether resident well-being and empathy are associated with assessments of their medical knowledge and clinical performance.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

We studied 730 clinical performance assessments completed by peers, supervising residents, and allied health professionals; 193 mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX) evaluations; and 260 in-training examinations (ITE) of Mayo Clinic internal medicine residents between January 2009 and August 2010. Multivariate generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate associations between residents' well-being and empathy and assessments of their knowledge and clinical performance.

MEASUREMENTS

Independent variables were empathy using the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI), burnout using the Maslach Burnout Inventory, depression using a standardized two-question screening instrument, and quality of life using a Linear Analog Self-Assessment item and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-8). Dependent variables were mini-CEX, ITE, and the validated six-item Mayo clinical performance assessment.

RESULTS

202 residents (64.7%) provided both well-being and at least one category of assessment data. In multivariate models, residents' scores on the IRI empathy measure of "the tendency to adopt the psychological view of others" were associated with higher peer ratings on "desirability as a physician for a family member" (beta = 0.023, 95% CI = 0.007-0.039, p = 0.004). Additionally, burnout was associated with higher supervisor ratings of communication (beta = 0.309, 95% CI = 0.100-0.517, p = 0.004). There were no observed associations between ITE or mini-CEX scores and resident quality of life, burnout, fatigue, depression, or empathy.

CONCLUSIONS

Most dimensions of resident well-being were not associated with residents' knowledge scores and assessments of their clinical performance by other members of the health care team, which supports the trustworthiness of these measures. Nonetheless, correlations of resident empathy and burnout with assessments completed by peers and supervising residents suggest that some ratings of residents may be influenced by interpersonal factors.

Simulação como estratégia de ensino em enfermagem: revisão de literatura

O objetivo desta revisão sistemática é apresentar a simulação como estratégia de ensino para estudantes de graduação em enfermagem, conforme estudos brasileiros. A busca foi realizada nas bases de dados BDENF, Lilacs e Medline, utilizando-se as palavras-chave: ensino, educação, laboratório, simulação e enfermagem. Foram incluídos os artigos científicos sobre simulação como estratégia de ensino para estudantes de enfermagem publicados em português, de janeiro de 1999 a setembro de 2010. Para análise dos dados, os autores aplicaram a técnica de análise temática de conteúdo, descrita por Bardin. Nove artigos foram selecionados, sendo classificados em duas categorias: sete em "Simulação por Computador" e dois em "Laboratório de Enfermagem". Os resultados indicam que a simulação contribui para a aquisição de habilidades psicomotoras e autoconfiança. Não foram encontrados ensaios clínicos sobre a eficácia da simulação na prática dos estudantes de enfermagem. Há necessidade de mais pesquisas sobre o tema.

A survey of resident opinions on peer evaluation in a large internal medicine residency program

BACKGROUND

Starting in the 1960s, studies have suggested that peer evaluation could provide unique insights into the performance of residents in training. However, reports of resident resistance to peer evaluation because of confidentiality issues and the possible impact on their working relationships raised concerns about the acceptability and utility of peer evaluation in graduate medical education. The literature suggests that peers are able to reliably assess communication, interpersonal skills, and professionalism and provide input that may differ from faculty evaluations. This study assessed the attitudes of internal medicine residents 1 year after the implementation of a peer-evaluation system.

METHODS

During the 2005-2006 academic year, we conducted an anonymous survey of the 168 residents in the Internal Medicine Residency Program at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Contingency table analysis was used to compare the response patterns of the groups.

RESULTS

The response rate was 61% (103/168 residents) and it did not differ by year of training. Most residents (74/103; 72%) felt that peers could provide valuable feedback. Eighty percent of residents (82/103) felt the feedback was important for their professional development and 84% (86/102) agreed that peers observe behaviors not seen by attending faculty.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that internal medicine residents provide unique assessment of their peers and provide feedback they consider important for their professional development. More importantly, the results support the role of peer evaluation in the assessment of the competencies of professionalism and interpersonal and communication skills.

Perspective: Transformative learning: a framework using critical reflection to link the improvement competencies in graduate medical education

Quality improvement (QI) in health care involves activities ranging from enhancing personal practice to reforming the larger health care system. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education recognizes this broad definition of QI in its requirement that physicians-in-training demonstrate competence in practice-based learning and improvement (PBLI) and systems-based practice (SBP). Creative metaphors have been used to teach the PBLI and SBP competencies, but conceptual frameworks describing the relationship between these competencies are needed. Transformative learning is an adult education theory that states individuals must critically reflect on life events in order to change their beliefs or behaviors. The authors propose that critical reflection during transformative learning can conceptually link PBLI and SBP. Reflection on personal experience with suboptimal patient care leads to recognizing personal or system limitations. Addressing personal limitations improves individual practice (PBLI), whereas applying QI methodologies leads to large-scale improvements (SBP). Educators who adopt the transformative learning framework should be able to design meaningful QI curricula that encourage residents to be reflective and empower them with QI skills.

The Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire (MCTQ) as a valid and reliable instrument for the evaluation of clinical teachers

PURPOSE

Clinical teaching's importance in the medical curriculum has led to increased interest in its evaluation. Instruments for evaluating clinical teaching must be theory based, reliable, and valid. The Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire (MCTQ), based on the theoretical constructs of cognitive apprenticeship, elicits evaluations of individual clinical teachers' performance at the workplace. The authors investigated its construct validity and reliability, and they used the underlying factors to test a causal model representing effective clinical teaching.

METHOD

Between March 2007 and December 2008, the authors asked students who had completed clerkship rotations in different departments of two teaching hospitals to use the MCTQ to evaluate their clinical teachers. To establish construct validity, the authors performed a confirmatory factor analysis of the evaluation data, and they estimated reliability by calculating the generalizability coefficient and standard error measurement. Finally, to test a model of the factors, they fitted a structural linear model to the data.

RESULTS

Confirmatory factor analysis yielded a five-factor model which fit the data well. Generalizability studies indicated that 7 to 10 student ratings can produce reliable ratings of individual teachers. The hypothesized structural linear model underlined the central roles played by modeling and coaching (mediated by articulation).

CONCLUSIONS

The MCTQ is a valid and reliable evaluation instrument, thereby demonstrating the usefulness of the cognitive apprenticeship concept for clinical teaching during clerkships. Furthermore, a valuable model of clinical teaching emerged, highlighting modeling, coaching, and stimulating students' articulation and exploration as crucial to effective teaching at the clinical workplace.

Resident physicians' perspectives on effective outpatient teaching: a qualitative study

Learning theories, which suggest that experienced faculty use collaborative teaching styles, are reflected in qualitative studies of learners in hospital settings. However, little research has used resident focus groups to explore characteristics of successful teachers in outpatient clinics. Therefore, focus group discussions with first through third-year internal medicine residents at a large academic medical center were conducted to better understand residents' perspectives on effective outpatient teaching. A group facilitator solicited residents' reflections, based on their lived experiences, on teaching domains from previous factor analytic studies: interpersonal, clinical-teaching, and efficiency. Researchers coded focus group transcripts and identified themes within the domains. Final themes were determined by consensus. Leading themes were "kindness" and "teacher-learner relationships." Junior residents were sensitive to faculty who were brusque, harsh, and degrading. Senior residents respected faculty who were humble, collaborative, and allowed residents to co-manage teaching encounters. Seniors emphasized the importance of faculty role-modelling and preferentially staffed with experts to "gain wisdom from experience." Overall, residents expressed that effective learning requires grounded teacher-learner relationships. These findings support learning theories and previous factor analytic studies. However, this qualitative study provided insights that could not be gleaned from assessment scores alone.

A multi-institutional survey of internal medicine residents' learning habits

BACKGROUND

Resident physicians are expected to demonstrate medical knowledge. However, little is known about the residents' reading habits and learning preferences.

AIM

To assess residents' reading habits and preferred educational resources.

METHODS

Residents at five internal medicine training programs were surveyed regarding their reading and learning habits and preferences.

RESULTS

The majority (77.7%) of residents reported reading less than 7 h a week. Most residents (81.4%) read in response to patient care encounters. The preferred educational format was electronic; 94.6% of residents cited UpToDate as the most effective resource for knowledge acquisition, and 88.9% of residents reported that UpToDate was their first choice for answering clinical questions.

CONCLUSIONS

Residents spent little time reading and sought knowledge primarily from electronic resources. Most residents read in the context of patient care. Future research should focus on strategies for helping resident physicians learn in the electronic age.

Impact of resident well-being and empathy on assessments of faculty physicians

BACKGROUND

Teaching effectiveness is an important criterion for promoting clinician-educators. However, the relationship between residents' psychological characteristics and their assessments of faculty physicians is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether residents' well-being and empathy influenced their assessments of faculty physicians.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

We studied 1,191 assessments of 356 faculty physicians by 209 internal medicine residents at a large academic medical center from 2007 to 2008. A repeated measures design with multivariate generalized estimating equations was used to evaluate associations between resident well-being and empathy, and residents' assessments of faculty.

MEASUREMENTS

Resident surveys included standardized measures of quality of life, burnout, depression, and empathy. Residents assessed faculty members' teaching performance with a validated 16-item instrument.

RESULTS

149 residents (71%) provided well-being, empathy, and assessment data. In multivariate models, faculty assessments from the previous year were the strongest predictor of current resident-of-faculty assessment scores. Residents' Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy (JSPE) scores were also associated with faculty assessments (beta = 0.0063, 95% CI = 0.0018-0.0108; p = .0061). On this 140-point, 20-item scale, a 10-point increase in empathy correlated with a 0.063-point increase in residents' assessments of faculty on a 5-point scale. There were no significant associations between residents' assessments of faculty and quality of life, burnout, or depression.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that residents' well-being does not influence their assessments of faculty physicians, thus supporting the trustworthiness of these assessments as a criterion for promoting clinician-educators. However, the association between residents' empathy and resident-of-faculty assessments suggests that faculty assessments may be modestly influenced by residents' intrinsic characteristics.