Advances in interventional cardiology

Myocardial Protection during Coronary Angioplasty with Autoperfusion and Forced Perfusion: An in vitro comparison

During coronary angioplasty, perfusion distal to the inflated angioplasty balloon can be maintained with autoperfusion balloon catheters and coronary perfusion pumps. The blood flow rates through the autoperfusion balloon catheters and the flow rates achieved with a perfusion pump were compared in vitro with fresh human blood at 37° C. In a specially designed system, blood flow rates through Stack™ autoperfusion balloon catheters were measured at 40, 60 and 80 mmHg continuous pressure. In another system, driving pressures were measured during perfusion with the pump, through a specially designed forced perfusion catheter at 20, 40 and 60 ml/min flow. The pressure applied in the autoperfusion experiments was converted into atmospheres (atm) to facilitate comparison with the driving pressures measured during pumping (1 mmHg = 1.316 × 10−3 atm). Mean flow rates through the autoperfusion balloon catheters were: 46 ml/min at 0.05 atm, 66 ml/min at 0.09 atm and 75 ml/min at 0.1 atm. Mean pressures during pumping were: 1.8 atm at 20 ml/min, 3.5 atm at 40 ml/min, 5 atm at 60 ml/min. Due to the phasic nature of coronary blood flow, the flow through autoperfusion balloons is generally lower than the minimum required for adequate myocardial protection (= 60 ml/min). Thus, autoperfusion balloon catheters are simpler and cheaper devices than perfusion pumps, but generally they are not able to provide adequate myocardial protection.

Outcomes of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Predictors of Survival in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography Including Percutaneous Coronary Interventions

We studied the outcome of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in patients undergoing coronary angiography (CA) and/or percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Of 51,985 CA and PCI patients treated between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 2000, 114 required CPR. Records were reviewed for relationships between patient characteristics and various procedures and short-term survival. Long-term survival was compared with that of a matched cohort of patients who did not have an arrest during catheterization and a matched cohort from the general Minnesota population. Over the 11-year period, the overall incidence of CPR was 21.9 per 10,000 procedures. This rate decreased from 33.9 per 10,000 before 1995 to 13.1 per 10,000 after 1995. Overall survival to hospital discharge after CPR was 56.1%. Survival to discharge was less frequent with a history of congestive heart failure, previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery, hemodynamic instability during the procedure, and with prolonged or emergent catheterizations. Pulseless electrical activity (versus asystole or ventricular fibrillation) indicated very poor short-term survival. Interestingly, short-term survival was not related to the extent of coronary artery disease. Long-term survival of patients who survived cardiac arrest was comparable to that of those who did not have arrest during catheterization. In conclusion, the incidence of periprocedural CPR during diagnostic or interventional coronary procedures decreased after 1995. Patients who received CPR in the cardiac catheterization lab have a remarkably frequent survival to hospital discharge rate. Long-term survival of these patients is only minimally reduced.

The Bard Rotary Atherectomy System (BRAS): initial experience in patients with peripheral vascular disease

Sixteen patients with a mean age of 65.4 +/- 9.8 years and suffering from peripheral vascular disease underwent peripheral atherectomy using a new mechanical device--the BARD Rotary Atherectomy System (BRAS). The BRAS is an "over the wire" system that consists of a spiral guidewire and a handheld motor drive unit, which rotates at 1,500 rpm. Prior to the procedure angiography demonstrated the presence of 18 obstructions (1 tibial, 2 popliteal, 15 superficial femoral arteries) with a mean stenosis of 95.7 +/- 8%. Successful atherectomy was achieved in 16 of 18 lesions and resulted in an 89% immediate success rate and a significant (P less than 0.01) reduction of stenosis to 37.8 +/- 12.5%. There were no significant complications. The excised and removed material embedded over the spiral guidewire demonstrated the presence of fibrotic tissue, fatty lesions, and calcium deposits. Medial or adventitial layers were not present in the removed atherosclerotic material. Mean ABI was significantly (P less than 0.01) increased from 0.38 +/- 0.17 to 0.55 +/- 0.21 following atherectomy. Angiographic follow-up obtained in ten patients 8.8 +/- 5.2 months following the procedure demonstrated restenosis in six of those ten patients. The ABI at this time remained unchanged. These results demonstrated that the new BRAS mechanical atherectomy system is feasible and safe for recanalization of severely stenosed arteries in patients with peripheral vascular disease.

Success rate and incidence of restenosis following coronary excimer laser angioplasty: results of a single center experience

The initial single center experience of percutaneous coronary excimer laser angioplasty is described for the first three series of 147 patients. Sixty patients were treated with a prototype 1.4-mm laser catheter, 40 patients with improved transmission devices, and the third series of 47 patients with an increased pulse width of the laser system allowing improved energy transmission. In 17 patients (12%) laser angioplasty could not be initiated due to inability to cross the lesion with the guidewire or to place the catheter coaxially within the vessel. In 32 patients (58%) of series 1, 11 patients (31%) of series 2, and 17 patients (43%) of series 3, additional balloon dilatation following laser treatment was necessary due to vessel closure (24%) or due to an insufficient angiographic result (35%). There was one death in series 1 (2%) and 2 (3%) each, one perforation in series 2 (3%), two transmural myocardial infarctions in series 1 (4%), and one myocardial infarction in series 2 (3%). During the 6-month follow-up period one patient in series 2 (2%), and one patient in series 3 (3%) died. Angiographic restenosis was found in 22, 12, and 11 patients of series 1 (40%), 2 (34%), and 3 (27%), respectively. No patient developed a transmural myocardial infarction. Thus, percutaneous coronary excimer laser angioplasty can be performed as a safe and feasible procedure in patients with coronary artery disease.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Interventional cardiology techniques for coronary artery disease

This review updates and extends observations made in this journal in March 1988. The focus then was on percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and the clinical results of its practical application. A concern was expressed that science lagged in solving the major problems of rethrombosis and restenosis. The NHLBI Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) study was still in the planning phase. In 1991, the scene has changed. Interventional cardiology now embraces a multitude of different catheter devices--angioplasty, atherectomy, laser, stents. Basic scientists are increasingly involved in addressing the restenosis issue. Our national heart meetings are increasingly oriented towards molecular biology approaches to solving the remaining problems. The BARI trial has nearly completed patient entry, and we eagerly await its results. The cardiologist and surgeon are faced with increasingly complex decisions with respect to interventional technologies, involving not only whether to use them, but which ones.