Clinical features and prognostic implications of severe corticosteroid-treated cryptogenic chronic active hepatitis

Autoimmune Hepatitis: Epidemiology, Subtypes, and Presentation

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic immunologic disorder in which the immune system targets the liver. The disease has a genetic basis and this accounts for the epidemiologic variation observed in serologic testing and clinical presentation across different populations. The incidence of AIH increases with age into the 70s and seems to be increasing in prevalence. Most patients test positive for antinuclear antibody, ASMA, or anti-LKM but about 20% of patients do not have these serologic markers. At clinical presentation, patients may be asymptomatic, symptomatic, have acute liver failure, or decompensated cirrhosis.

Seronegative Autoimmune Hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a relatively rare liver disease with varying worldwide incidence of from 0.7 to 2 per 100,000 people. It is characterized by the presence of auto-antibodies. However, an average of 10% of AIH cases have AIH symptoms and pathology but lack autoimmune serology. For such seronegative AIH (snAIH) cases, there is currently no established diagnostic algorithm for diagnosis. and improper or delayed diagnosis of snAIH can lead to no or inappropriate treatment that results in progression to fulminant hepatitis or cirrhosis. This review aims to review the current literature and to present an update of seronegative autoimmune hepatitis, including its pathophysiology, clinical presentation, methods of diagnosis, and treatment in order to increase awareness and emphasize the necessity for timely management.

Flare of Autoimmune Hepatitis Causing Acute on Chronic Liver Failure: Diagnosis and Response to Corticosteroid Therapy

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is considered less common in the Asia Pacific region. Due to this, AIH flare as a cause of acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF) is often overlooked and treatment delayed. We aimed at the defining clinical and histopathological spectrum and role of steroid therapy in AIH-ACLF. Patients with AIH-ACLF, prospectively recruited and followed between 2012 and 2017, were analyzed from the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver ACLF Research Consortium (AARC) data base. Diagnosis of AIH was confirmed using International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group score or simplified AIH score with histopathological evidence. Of 2,825 ACLF patients, 82 (2.9%) fulfilled criteria of AIH (age 42.1 ± 18.1 years, 70% female). At baseline, mean bilirubin was 18.6 ± 8.2 mg/dL, Child-Turcotte-Pugh score was 11.7 ± 1.4, and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was 27.6 ± 6.5. Mean immunoglobulin G was 21.61 ± 7.32 g/dL, and this was elevated ≥1.1 times in 97% of cases; 49% were seronegative. Liver histology was available in 90%, with median histological activity index of 10 (interquartile range, 7-12); 90% with moderate to severe interface activity; 56% showing significant parenchymal necrosis (bridging and confluent necrosis); and cirrhosis in 42%. Twenty-eight (34%) patients received steroid therapy and showed shorter intensive care unit (ICU) stay (median 1.5 versus 4 days, P < 0.001) and improved 90-day survival (75% versus 48.1%, P = 0.02) with comparable incidence of sepsis (P = 0.32) compared to those who did not. Patients of advanced age, more severe liver disease (MELD >27; 83.3% sensitivity, 78.9% specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.86), presence of hepatic encephalopathy, and fibrosis grade ≥F3 had an unfavorable response to corticosteroid therapy. Conclusion: AIH presenting as ACLF is not uncommon in Asian patients; a low threshold for liver biopsy is needed to confirm the diagnosis as nearly half the patients are seronegative; early stratification to steroid therapy or liver transplantation (MELD >27, hepatic encephalopathy in ≥F3) would reduce ICU stay and improve outcomes.

A Case of Acute Autoimmune Hepatitis Superimposed on Chronic Hepatitis B Infection

Autoimmune hepatitis has been associated with chronic HCV infection, but there are only few cases reported of HBV infection as a possible trigger. We present a case of a young male who was diagnosed with acute autoimmune hepatitis superimposed on existent chronic HBV infection. A 30-year-old Hispanic male with no past medical history presented to the hospital with complaints of few days of generalized weakness. Laboratory findings were significant for elevated liver enzymes: AST, 1164 U/L; ALT, 1461 U/L; total bilirubin, 2 MG/DL; and alkaline phosphatase, 75 IU/L. Extensive workup was done to find the etiology for elevated liver enzymes. Only blood work that came back positive was for chronic HBV infection and elevated immunoglobulin G (IgG) level 1937 mg/dL. HBV viral load was 42,900,000 IU/mL. The patient was started on tenofovir 300 mg daily. Liver biopsy was done which was consistent with autoimmune hepatitis. Prednisone 60 mg daily was started. Six months later, blood work showed completely normal liver enzymes and total IgG. Hepatotropic viruses have been proposed as triggering factors for several autoimmune diseases. There are theories suggesting that similarity in viral epitope and self-proteins expression on liver cells' surface causes a cross-reactive immunologic response and possible viral-induced autoimmune hepatitis.

Seronegative Autoimmune Hepatitis A Clinically Challenging Difficult Diagnosis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a complex liver disease of unknown cause which results in immune-mediated liver injury with varied clinical presentations. Seronegative AIH follows a similar course to autoantibody-positive disease and diagnosis may be challenging. There are no single serologic tests of sufficient diagnostic specificity, and delay in appropriate treatment may lead to progression of the liver disease and liver failure. The revised conventional diagnostic criteria (RDC) scoring for AIH is complex and not routinely used in the clinical practice. The more recent simplified diagnostic criteria (SDC) scoring proposed by International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group in 2008 has wider application in routine practice facilitating the diagnosis of AIH with a specificity and sensitivity of ~90%. In this report, we describe a case of seronegative autoimmune hepatitis diagnosed using RDC. SDC score calculated in our case was 4 and was not diagnostic for AIH. We subsequently used the complex revised diagnostic criteria for definitive diagnosis. Some of the patients previously diagnosed as cryptogenic active hepatitis of unknown etiology probably had an unrecognized diagnosis of seronegative autoimmune hepatitis. SDC scoring may not be applicable in patients with seronegative autoimmune hepatitis. These patients should be reassessed by using RDC.

Natural History and Treatment Outcomes of Severe Autoimmune Hepatitis

GOALS

The aim of this study was to analyze the natural history and treatment outcomes of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) variants presenting with severe-AIH.

BACKGROUND

Severe acute presentation is an uncommon manifestation of AIH, and it remains poorly characterized.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included 101 patients with AIH from January 2011 to December 2015. Patients were classified as seropositive-AIH and seronegative-AIH. Patients with acute liver failure, acute-on-chronic liver failure, and severe acute hepatitis were defined as severe-AIH patients. Patient characteristics and treatment outcomes with follow-up until 12 months were analyzed between the different groups.

RESULTS

Out of 101 cases, 24 (23.76%) had severe AIH. Of them 9 (37.5%) had severe acute hepatitis, 3 (12.5%) had acute liver failure, and 12 (50%) had acute-on-chronic liver failure. Seronegative-AIH patients presented with severe-AIH significantly more frequently compared with seropositive-AIH patients (50% vs. 20.27%, P=0.022). Severe-AIH had 50% complete responders, 25% partial responders, and 25% treatment failures. Jaundice (88.88% vs. 68.7%, P=0.048), encephalopathy (55.55% vs. 6.66%, P=0.014), and higher international normalized ratio values (2.17±0.60 vs. 1.82±0.14, P=0.038) were factors associated with nonresponse rather than the presence or absence of autoantibodies in severe-AIH. The hazard ratio for predicting remission in the non-severe AIH group as compared with the severe-AIH group was 1.502, which was statistically not significant (95% CI, 0.799-2.827; P=0.205).

CONCLUSION

Approximately 24% of patients with AIH have severe-AIH. Conventional autoantibodies are often absent in severe-AIH; however, it does not alter the outcome. Immunosuppressants should be given expediently in patients with severe-AIH.

IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis overlapping with autoimmune hepatitis: Report of a case

BACKGROUND

IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis (IgG4-SC) is the biliary manifestation of IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) but the presence of IgG4-SC in the porta hepatis is difficult to differentiate from hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA). IgG4-related autoimmune hepatitis (IgG4-related AIH) is extremely rare and it is not fully clear whether IgG4-related AIH is a hepatic manifestation of IgG4-RD or a subtype of AIH.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present a rare case of a 52-year-old male who was admitted with obstructive jaundice and itchy skin. He primarily presented a severe bile duct stricture in the porta hepatis and an elevated serum level of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) mimicking HCCA. The patient underwent a surgical resection of the left hepatic lobular and cholecyst as well as common bile duct with a right hepatico-jejunostomy. He was finally diagnosed as IgG4-SC accompanied with IgG4-related AIH by immunohistochemistry, but he lacked conventional autoantibodies. The patient responded well to steroid therapy and remains healthy with no signs of recurrence at six-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

This is the first case report that hepatic portal IgG4-SC overlapping with IgG4-related AIH without the presence of conventional autoantibodies. Additionally, we suggest that IgG4-RD should be always considered in case of a bile duct stricture in the porta hepatis to avoid unnecessary surgical operation.

Autoantibody-negative autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis has a variable clinical phenotype, and the absence of conventional autoantibodies does not preclude its diagnosis or need for treatment. The goals of this review are to describe the frequency and nature of autoantibody-negative autoimmune hepatitis, indicate its outcome after corticosteroid treatment, and increase awareness of the diagnosis in patients with unexplained acute and chronic hepatitis. The frequency of presumed autoantibody-negative autoimmune hepatitis in patients with acute and acute severe presentations is ≤7%, and its frequency in patients with chronic presentations is 1-34%. Patients with acute presentations can have normal serum γ-globulin levels, centrilobular zone 3 necrosis, and low pre-treatment international diagnostic scores. Liver tissue examination is essential for the diagnosis, and hepatic steatosis can be a co-morbid feature. The comprehensive international scoring system can support but never override the clinical diagnosis pre-treatment, and non-standard serological markers should be sought if the clinical diagnosis is uncertain or the diagnostic score is low. A 3-month treatment trial with corticosteroids should be considered in all patients, regardless of the serological findings, and improvements have occurred in 67-87% of cases. Autoantibody-negative autoimmune hepatitis may be associated with an autoantibody outside the conventional battery; it may have a signature autoantibody that is still undiscovered, or its characteristic autoantibodies may have been suppressed or have a delayed expression. The pathogenic mechanisms are presumed to be identical to those of classical disease. Autoantibody-negative autoimmune hepatitis is an infrequent but treatable disease that must be considered in unexplained acute and chronic hepatitis.

Cryptogenic chronic hepatitis and its changing guise in adults

Cryptogenic chronic hepatitis is a disease that is unexplained by conventional clinical, laboratory and histological findings, and it can progress to cirrhosis, develop hepatocellular carcinoma, and require liver transplantation. The goals of this review are to describe the changing phenotype of cryptogenic chronic hepatitis in adults, develop a diagnostic algorithm appropriate to current practice, and suggest treatment options. The frequency of cryptogenic hepatitis is estimated at 5.4%. Cryptogenic cirrhosis is diagnosed in 5-30% of patients with cirrhosis, and it is present in 3-14% of adults awaiting liver transplantation. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease has been implicated in 21-63% of patients, and autoimmune hepatitis is a likely diagnosis in 10-54% of individuals. Viral infections, hereditary liver diseases, celiac disease, and unsuspected alcohol or drug-induced liver injury are recognized infrequently in the current cryptogenic population. Manifestations of the metabolic syndrome heighten the suspicion of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, and the absence of hepatic steatosis does not discount this possibility. The diagnostic scoring system of the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group can support the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis in some patients. Certain genetic mutations may have disease-specificity, and they suggest that some patients may have an independent and uncharacterized disease. Corticosteroid therapy is effective in patients with autoimmune features, and life-style changes and specific therapies for manifestations of the metabolic syndrome are appropriate for all obese patients. The 1- and 5-year survivals after liver transplantation have ranged from 72-85% to 58-73%, respectively.

Optimizing management in autoimmune hepatitis with liver failure at initial presentation

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a disease of unknown etiology, its hallmark being ongoing hepatic inflammation. By its very nature, it is a chronic condition, although increasingly, we are becoming aware of patients with acute presentations, some of whom may have liver failure. There are very limited published data on patients with AIH with liver failure at initial diagnosis, which consist mostly of small retrospective studies. As a consequence, the clinical features and optimal management of this cohort remain poorly defined. A subset of patients with AIH who present with liver failure do respond to corticosteroids, but for the vast majority, an urgent liver transplantation may offer the only hope of long-term survival. At present, there is uncertainty on how best to stratify such a cohort into responders and non- responders to corticosteroids as soon as possible after hospitalization, thus optimizing their management. This editorial attempts to answer some of the unresolved issues relating to management of patients with AIH with liver failure at initial presentation. However, it must be emphasized that, at present, this editorial is based mostly on small retrospective studies, and it is an understatement that multicenter prospective studies are urgently needed to address this important clinical issue.

Advances in the diagnosis, pathogenesis, and management of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is characterized by chronic inflammation of the liver, interface hepatitis (based on histologic examination), hypergammaglobulinemia, and production of autoantibodies. Many clinical and basic science studies have provided important insights into the pathogenesis and treatment of AIH. Transgenic mice that express human antigens and develop autoantibodies, liver-infiltrating CD4(+) T cells, liver inflammation, and fibrosis have been developed as models of AIH. AIH has been associated with autoantibodies against members of the cytochrome P450 superfamily of enzymes, transfer RNA selenocysteine synthase, formiminotransferase cyclodeaminase, and the uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferases, whereas alleles such as DRB1*0301 and DRB1*0401 are genetic risk factors in white North American and northern European populations. Deficiencies in the number and function of CD4(+)CD25(+) (regulatory) T cells disrupt immune homeostasis and might be corrected as a therapeutic strategy. Treatment can be improved by continuing corticosteroid therapy until normal liver test results and normal liver tissue are within normal limits, instituting ancillary therapies to prevent drug-related side effects, identifying problematic patients early, and providing long-term maintenance therapy after patients experience a first relapse. Calcineurin inhibitors and mycophenolate mofetil are potential salvage therapies, and reagents such as recombinant interleukin-10, abatacept, and CD3-specific antibodies are feasible as therapeutics. Liver transplantation is an effective salvage therapy, even in the elderly, and AIH must be considered in all patients with graft dysfunction after liver transplantation. Identification of the key defects in immune homeostasis and antigen targets will direct new therapies.

Difficult treatment decisions in autoimmune hepatitis

Treatment decisions in autoimmune hepatitis are complicated by the diversity of its clinical presentations, uncertainties about its natural history, evolving opinions regarding treatment end points, varied nature of refractory disease, and plethora of alternative immunosuppressive agents. The goals of this article are to review the difficult treatment decisions and to provide the bases for making sound therapeutic judgments. The English literature on the treatment problems in autoimmune hepatitis were identified by Medline search up to October 2009 and 32 years of personal experience. Autoimmune hepatitis may have an acute severe presentation, mild inflammatory activity, lack autoantibodies, exhibit atypical histological changes (centrilobular zone 3 necrosis or bile duct injury), or have variant features reminiscent of another disease (overlap syndrome). Corticosteroid therapy must be instituted early, applied despite the absence of symptoms, or modified in an individualized fashion. Pursuit of normal liver tests and tissue is the ideal treatment end point, but this objective must be tempered against the risk of side effects. Relapse after treatment withdrawal requires long-term maintenance therapy, preferably with azathioprine. Treatment failure or an incomplete response warrants salvage therapy that can include conventional medications in modified dose or empirical therapies with calcineurin inhibitors or mycophenolate mofetil. Liver transplantation supersedes empirical drug therapy in decompensated patients. Elderly and pregnant patients warrant treatment modifications. Difficult treatment decisions in autoimmune hepatitis can be simplified by recognizing its diverse manifestations and individualizing treatment, pursuing realistic goals, applying appropriate salvage regimens, and identifying problematic patients early.

Non-classical phenotypes of autoimmune hepatitis and advances in diagnosis and treatment

Non-classical manifestations of autoimmune hepatitis can delay diagnosis and treatment. Our aims were to describe the clinical phenotypes that can confound the diagnosis, detail scoring systems that can ensure their recognition, and outline advances in treatment that can improve their outcome. Prime source and review articles in English were selected through Medline from 1970-2008 and assimilated into personal libraries spanning 32 years. Acute severe or asymptomatic presentations and atypical histological findings, including centrilobular zone 3 necrosis and concurrent bile duct changes, are compatible with the diagnosis. Cholangiographic abnormalities may be present in children and adults with the disease, and autoimmune hepatitis must be considered in patients without autoantibodies or with antimitochondrial antibodies and no other cholestatic features. Asymptomatic patients frequently become symptomatic; mild disease can progress; and there are no confident indices that justify withholding treatment. Two diagnostic scoring systems with complementary virtues have been developed to evaluate patients with confusing features. Normal liver tests and tissue constitute the optimal end point of treatment, and the first relapse is an indication for long-term azathioprine therapy. Cyclosporine, tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil are promising salvage therapies, and budesonide with azathioprine may be a superior frontline treatment. We conclude that the non-classical phenotypes of autoimmune hepatitis can be recognized promptly, diagnosed accurately, and treated effectively.

Serologic markers do not predict histologic severity or response to treatment in patients with autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is characterized by the presence of circulating autoantibodies, hypergammaglobulinemia, necroinflammatory histology, and a response to immunosuppressive drugs. The goal of this retrospective study was to determine whether the presence of antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) or anti-smooth muscle antibodies (ASMAs) in patients with AIH correlated with clinical presentation, histologic findings, or response to immunosuppressive therapy.

METHODS

Fifty-two patients diagnosed with AIH, on the basis of the revised scoring system of International Autoimmune Hepatitis group, were reviewed. Data on age, gender, aminotransferase levels, autoantibody titers, treatment regimens, and response to treatment were recorded. Seropositivity was defined as ANA >1:40 or ASMA >1:40. Percutaneous liver biopsies obtained at the initial presentation were reviewed.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients with AIH (81%) were seropositive, and 10 (19%) were seronegative. Both groups were similar with respect to demographics, treatment regimens, and response to therapy. Histologic parameters were similar among the 2 groups, including portal and lobular inflammation, piecemeal necrosis, and centrilobular necrosis. There were no significant differences in aminotransferase levels at diagnosis or after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of ANAs or ASMAs did not correlate with the clinical or histologic severity of AIH at diagnosis. Furthermore, there was no correlation between antibody status and response to immunosuppressive therapy. Therefore, patients who meet the diagnosis of AIH on the basis of the revised scoring system of International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group should be given immunosuppressive therapy, regardless of antibody status.

Corticosteroid-responsive cryptogenic chronic hepatitis: evidence for seronegative autoimmune hepatitis

Cryptogenic chronic hepatitis (CCH) is diagnosed in patients with persistently elevated aminotransferase levels of unknown etiology. The workup of CCH patients must include a liver biopsy in order to exclude the largely unrecognized diagnosis of seronegative autoimmune hepatitis (SAIH). Patients with SAIH have demographic, biochemical, and histologic features of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and may be treated effectively with corticosteroids. Recognition and treatment of SAIH are necessary to prevent progression to end-stage liver disease. We performed a retrospective review of a database of 3507 patients seen at our institution over a 5-year period. Thirty patients with conventional AIH and an additional six patients with SAIH were identified. The two groups were similar with respect to mean age, gender, and baseline biochemistry. Of the 20 AIH patients who had pretreatment liver biopsies, 85% had moderate to severe interface hepatitis, compared to 83.3% of patients with SAIH. In the SAIH group, 83.3% had advanced fibrosis (stage 3 or 4), versus 40% in the conventional AIH group (P = 0.16). All patients were treated with corticosteroids followed by azathioprine. The mean time to remission (normal ALT) was similar in both groups, 2.6 vs. 2.7 months. Within 3 months, 88.9% of AIH patients and 66.7% of SAIH patients were in remission. We conclude that a trial of corticosteroids is a reasonable therapeutic measure in patients with chronic hepatitis that has features of AIH despite negative autoantibody markers. In most patients, clinical remission will be seen within 3 months, possibly avoiding progression to end-stage liver disease.

Autoantibodies in autoimmune liver disease

Autoantibodies indicate an immune reactive state, but in liver disease they lack pathogenicity and disease specificity. Antinuclear antibodies, smooth muscle antibodies, antibodies to liver/kidney microsome type 1, antimitochondrial antibodies, and perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies constitute the standard serological repertoire that should be assessed in all liver diseases of undetermined cause. Antibodies to soluble liver antigen/liver pancreas, asialoglycoprotein receptor, actin, liver cytosol type 1, nuclear antigens specific to primary biliary cirrhosis, and pore complex antigens constitute an investigational repertoire that promises to have prognostic and diagnostic value. These autoantibodies may emerge as predictors of treatment response and outcome. Antibodies to histones, doubled-stranded DNA, chromatin, and lactoferrin constitute a supplemental repertoire, and they support the immune nature of the liver disease. Final diagnoses and treatment strategies do not depend solely on serological markers. Autoantibodies are floating variables, and their behavior does not correlate closely with disease activity. There are no minimum levels of significant seropositivity, especially in children. Over-interpretation is the major pitfall in the clinical application of the serological results. New autoantibodies will emerge as the search for target antigens and key pathogenic pathways continues.

Autoimmune hepatitis: diagnostic criteria, subclassifications, and clinical features

The diagnosis of AIH depends on the finding of several suggestive features together with careful exclusion of liver diseases of other etiologies. Wherever possible, the diagnosis should be confirmed histologically by an experienced hepatopathologist. Seronegativity for the conventional autoantibodies at presentation does not exclude a diagnosis of AIH. It is important to test for anti-LKM1 antibodies to avoid missing a diagnosis of type 2 AIH, with potentially serious consequences. Although the syndrome is associated with characteristic biochemical abnormalities, and biochemical parameters are commonly used for monitoring response to therapy, it should be borne in mind that neither these nor autoantibody titers are completely reliable indices of disease activity. Although the various systems that have been promulgated for classification of the disease may identify different groups of patients on pathogenetic or clinical criteria and are useful for research purposes, none is yet sufficiently exclusive in terms of defining prognosis or planning treatment strategies to be applicable to the individual patient seen in the clinic. Clinical management should therefore continue to be individually tailored.

The role of histologic evaluation in the diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis and its variants

The diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis requires a constellation of clinical, laboratory, and histologic features that exclude other conditions and support the syndrome. Interface hepatitis is the histologic hallmark of the disease, and it may be associated with panacinar hepatitis with or without bridging necrosis or multiacinar necrosis. The liver tissue examination at accession supports the diagnosis and assesses disease severity. It can also suggest the diagnosis in patients with atypical presentations, including those with an acute onset or cryptogenic disease. The liver tissue examination during therapy defines end points of treatment (remission) and evaluates unexpected outcomes (treatment failure, incomplete response). Manifestations of bile duct injury are incompatible with the classic diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis, and they may be coincidental findings of no or uncertain clinical significance or weak expressions of a variant form. Histologic features of autoimmune hepatitis may intermix with those of PBC, PSC, and chronic hepatitis C infection, or they may occur in autoimmune cholangitis or cryptogenic chronic hepatitis. Conditions in which the histologic findings suggest the overlap of two disorders or are insufficient for designation as classic disease constitute the variant syndromes.

Type 1 autoimmune hepatitis in Turkish patients: absence of association with HLA B8

BACKGROUND

There is very little information about autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) in populations other than of white European or Japanese descent.

GOALS

To investigate the presenting features, immunogenetic background, and response to standard immunosuppressive therapy in native Turkish patients with AIH.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of all patients referred between 1994 and 2000 to our hepatology clinic in Ankara who fulfilled international criteria for definite or probable type 1 or type 2 AIH.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients (15 female; median age, 31 years; range, 13-56 years) were identified. All had type 1 AIH. Clinical and laboratory features were broadly similar to those reported for white or Japanese patients. Five had the HLA DR3 allotype and 10 had DR4; however, in contrast to white and Japanese patients, DR4 was not associated with an older age at onset. Importantly, no patient had the B8 allotype (vs. 10.9% in 110 healthy Turkish subjects). Thus, none had the classic A1-B8-DR3 autoimmune haplotype: a major distinction from white individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

There appears to be genetic differences in type 1 AIH between Turkish and other populations. Genotyping of Turkish patients to identify alleles that may confer susceptibility or resistance to AIH may progress understanding of the genetic basis of the disease.

Autoimmune hepatitis in African Americans: presenting features and response to therapy

OBJECTIVES

African Americans are at an increased risk for certain diseases and more frequently suffer complications of those diseases relative to their white counterparts. Most studies of autoimmune hepatitis consist of entirely white populations. The Emory University system of hospitals serves a large African American population, including a significant number of African Americans with autoimmune hepatitis. The goal of this study was to determine if the presentation and response to therapy in African Americans is, like other diseases, different than in whites.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study from a tertiary referral center that examines the initial presenting features and response to therapy of African Americans (n = 27) and whites (n = 24) with autoimmune hepatitis.

RESULTS

Eighty-five percent of African Americans had cirrhosis on the initial liver biopsy, as compared with 38% of whites. Although not statistically significant, the African Americans presented at an earlier age than white patients. The disease also appeared more advanced in African Americans, as bilibubin levels tended to be higher, but not significantly, and PTs were more prolonged. Both groups responded well to therapy, with significant falls in serum levels of AST, ALT, and bilirubin. Fifty percent of African Americans and 48% of whites entered a biochemical remission. The amount of prednisone required to maintain remission at follow-up was greater in African Americans.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to whites, the majority of African Americans present with cirrhosis. Despite the high prevalence of cirrhosis, the response to therapy is good. However, more immunosuppression is required to control the disease in African Americans.

Pathologic features of chronic hepatitis. A review and update

The general histopathologic changes of chronic hepatitis and those related to the various causes are reviewed. Consideration also is given to underlying or associated diseases and to mixed infections in chronic viral hepatitis. Changes occurring in exacerbations or relapses are described. Selected histopathologic changes are illustrated. The nomenclature is reviewed briefly, with emphasis on separation of activity from stage of disease.

Variant forms of autoimmune hepatitis

Variant forms of autoimmune hepatitis have features that are intermixed with another disorder (overlap syndrome) or findings that are inconsistent with or insufficient for a confident diagnosis of classic disease (outlier syndrome). Diagnostic criteria have not been codified, but application of a modified scoring system provides a template that can be combined with clinical findings to ensure uniform evaluation and classification. Variant forms are frequently assimilated into conventional diagnostic categories. and they may distort analyses of natural history and outcome. Management strategies are empiric, based on an assessment of the predominant characteristics and institution of the most appropriate drug regimen. Patients with variant syndromes who respond to corticosteroids typically have serum alkaline phosphatase levels of less than twofold the upper limit of normal at presentation. By distinguishing between these syndromes, further insights into natural history, genetic predisposition, and immunopathic mechanisms are possible.

Idiopathic adulthood ductopenia: an update

Idiopathic adulthood ductopenia (IAD), named only 10 years ago, is the latest entity to join the group of small-duct biliary diseases. On the basis of published data and my consultation practice, I am aware of 57 cases. Most commonly, IAD affects young or middle-aged adults (overall range of affected patients, 15 to 77 years) and occurs with a distinct male preponderance. The median age of male and female patients among 48 published and unpublished cases was 30 and 36 years, respectively (in 9 cases, the precise age had not been stated). The age range probably encompasses several etiologic groups with different age distributions. Biopsy specimens, by definition, show ductopenia and its complications but no other lesions. Laboratory studies reveal a cholestatic profile, but again, by definition, these cases show no changes that would be diagnostic or suggestive of another biliary disease. In approximately half the published cases in which the outcome was reported, the condition seemed to have a benign course; in contradistinction, the other cases of IAD were fatal or necessitated liver transplantation. Indirect evidence suggests that IAD is a syndrome with several causes, including (1) late-onset nonsyndromic paucity of intrahepatic bile ducts, (2) small-duct primary sclerosing cholangitis ("pericholangitis") without large duct involvement and without evidence of inflammatory bowel disease, (3) nonsuppurative viral cholangitis--for instance, in hepatitis C, and (4) autoimmune cholangitis or cholangitis in autoimmune hepatitis, in the absence of the typical autoantibodies (cryptogenic chronic hepatitis). For progressive cases of IAD, liver transplantation is necessary, whether or not a specific cause is suspected.

Is severe cryptogenic chronic hepatitis similar to autoimmune hepatitis?

BACKGROUND/AIMS

It has been reported that severe cryptogenic chronic hepatitis may be a subgroup of autoimmune hepatitis. The aims of this study were to investigate the clinical features, liver function tests, human leukocyte antigens and response to immunosuppressive therapy in severe cryptogenic chronic hepatitis, and to compare the findings in such patients with those in patients with autoimmune hepatitis.

METHODS

History of alcohol and hepatotoxic drug intake, markers of metabolic liver disease, autoantibodies (antinuclear antibody, smooth muscle antibody, antibody to liver/kidney microsome type 1), and viral markers (HBsAg, HBV DNA, anti-HCV, HCV RNA) were negative in all severe cryptogenic chronic hepatitis patients (histological activity index > 9 and alanine aminotransferase level > 2 x normal). Fifteen cryptogenic patients (13 women; mean age, 33 +/- 16 years) and seven autoimmune patients (seven women; mean age, 28 +/- 3.9 years; five type 1; two type 2a) received prednisolone and azathioprine for at least 2 years.

RESULTS

Cryptogenic chronic hepatitis patients were similar to patients with autoimmune hepatitis with respect to age, sex, clinical presentation, liver function tests and Knodell scores at admission. HLA phenotype frequencies were comparable between cryptogenic and autoimmune groups: BW6 (77% vs. 100%), DR4 (62% vs. 57%), and HLA B8 (15% vs. 43%). The rates of complete and partial remissions achieved during therapy were 87% vs. 57% and 13% vs. 29%, respectively (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical, biochemical and HLA phenotypic features, and the responsiveness to immunosuppressive therapy in severe cryptogenic chronic hepatitis support the idea that it may be an autoimmune liver disease similar to autoimmune hepatitis.

Diagnosis and therapy of autoimmune liver disease

The diagnostic criteria for autoimmune hepatitis have been codified by international consensus. Standardized clinical criteria or a scoring system that grades each relevant feature secure the diagnosis. Three types of autoimmune hepatitis have been proposed based on immunoserologic markers, but various forms exist. Multiple autoantibodies have diagnostic capability, but their clinical relevancy remains uncertain. Prednisone alone or in combination with azathioprine is effective therapy in most patients. Poor outcomes justify alternative strategies and evaluation of promising new drugs.

Validation of scoring system for diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis

To assess the validity of a scoring system developed by the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group for the definite diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis, 119 patients with autoimmune hepatitis by standard clinical criteria and 131 patients with other chronic liver diseases were evaluated. Each patient was graded on 35 items in 13 clinical categories. Ninety-seven patients diagnosed as having autoimmune hepatitis by conventional criteria (82%) had a definite diagnosis by the scoring system and 22 patients (18%) had a probable diagnosis. Of these patients, those with definite diagnoses had significant clinical differences from those with probable diagnoses. Only two patients with other chronic liver disease (2%) had scores sufficient for a definite diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis. Probable diagnoses, however, were common in other conditions (33%). Failure to adequately downgrade for cholestatic features contributed to these uncertain diagnoses. Scoring for treatment response downgraded the diagnosis in 17 of 93 patients with a definite diagnosis before therapy (18%) and upgraded the diagnosis in 6 of 14 others (43%). We conclude that the scoring system is specific for the definite diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis, and it complements standard clinical criteria by establishing the strength of the diagnosis and defining distinctive subgroups within the diagnostic category. Refinements are necessary to reduce the frequency of probable diagnoses. Diagnoses at presentation can be commonly modified by scoring treatment response.

Prognosis and life expectancy in chronic liver disease

The aim of the present was to define prognosis and life expectancy in patients with chronic liver disease of different etiologies and to relate them to an age- and sex-matched normal population. After a follow-up of 15 years, life expectancy of 620 patients with chronic liver disease was retrospectively calculated and compared with an age- and sex-matched normal population. Among patients with cirrhosis, prognosis was dependent upon Child classification (P = 0.001). Patients with alcoholic cirrhosis and fatty liver disease were younger (P = 0.01) and had a lower life expectancy than patients with other causes of chronic liver disease (P = 0.004). Patients with hepatitis B and hepatitis C cirrhosis showed a comparable prognosis and a significantly lower life expectancy than the age- and sex-matched population. Cryptogenic and autoimmune liver diseases showed a comparable life expectancy but a significantly shorter life expectancy than the normal population. In patients with alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency-associated cirrhosis, a high viral coinfection rate was found (P = 0.01). For patients with noncirrhotic hemochromatosis, prognosis was poorer than that for the age- and sex-matched population. In patients with asymptomatic primary biliary cirrhosis, chronic persistent hepatitis B, and alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency without cirrhosis, life expectancy was equal to that of the normal population. Prognosis and life expectancy in chronic liver disease depend on stage, cause, and symptoms of chronic liver disease; age; and possibilities of treatment. In patients with hereditary liver disease, additional viral infection of alcohol abuse lead to a significant deterioration of life expectancy. Patients with alcoholic chronic liver disease have the poorest prognosis.

Latent autoimmune hepatitis triggered during interferon therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Interferon can induce autoantibodies and autoimmune reactions. This study reviewed the clinical, serological, and HLA phenotypical features of patients who developed autoimmune hepatitis during interferon therapy for chronic hepatitis C, analyzing their response to immunosuppressive treatment.

METHODS

The diagnosis of chronic hepatitis C was based on positivity for viral RNA and a liver biopsy specimen obtained before interferon treatment. Sera were tested for autoantibodies by indirect immunofluorescence assay. HLA typing was performed by applying a standard microlymphocytotoxicity method.

RESULTS

Of 144 patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with interferon, 7 women deteriorated during treatment; serum transaminase, gamma-globulin, and immunoglobulin G levels increased; and serum autoantibodies became positive. Interferon was interrupted, a diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis was established, and immunosuppressive therapy was initiated. All patients responded to this treatment. The 7 patients had similar HLA typing to those with autoimmune hepatitis, with DR4 in 2 patients (67%) with type 2 autoimmune hepatitis, and with DR3 and DR52 in 2 (50%) and 4 (100%) patients, respectively, with type 1 autoimmune hepatitis; additionally, 5 patients (71%) had DQ2, and 4 (57%) had both DR52 and DQ2.

CONCLUSIONS

In female patients with chronic hepatitis C, a genetic susceptibility to autoimmune hepatitis may exist, possibly triggered by immunostimulating effects during interferon therapy. Immunosuppressive treatment has been well tolerated and seems to be effective.

Virus-induced autoimmunity in hepatitis C virus infections: a rare event

Serial serum samples from 16 Italian patients presenting with acute hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections (which progressed to chronic hepatitis in six) were screened for the non-organ-specific autoantibodies most frequently associated with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), as well as for antibodies against the hepatic asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGP-R) and against the GOR peptide. One patient had low titres (1:10-1:80) of liver-kidney microsomal (LKM-1) antibodies during the recovery phase and three others had transient low titres of anti-smooth muscle (IgM class, 1:10) or anti-ASGP-R (1:150-1:300). Anti-GOR was detected in 43 (65%) of 66 sera from 13 of these patients. There was no correlation between any of these findings and progression to chronicity. By comparison, 18 patients with AIH studied concurrently before institution of immunosuppressive therapy all had antinuclear and/or smooth muscle antibodies, or LKM-1, at 1:40-1:640 and anti-ASGP-R at 1:300-1:2,100. None of these 18 had evidence of HCV infection and all were seronegative for anti-GOR. The findings indicate that the autoantibodies usually associated with AIH are rare in HCV infections but the virus can very occasionally induce a transient autoimmune response. Anti-GOR appears to be an antibody specifically related to HCV infection and is probably not a marker of induced autoimmunity, and it does not predict progression to chronic hepatitis.

Granulomatous lipophagic panniculitis and temporal arteritis in a patient with cryptogenic chronic active hepatitis

An elderly woman receiving long term treatment with prednisone and azathioprine for cryptogenic chronic active hepatitis developed granulomatous lipophagic panniculitis and temporal arteritis. The lymphoplasmahistiocytic inflammatory reaction pattern is common to this patient's three diseases. It is suggested that an aberration of the defence mechanisms, immunological or otherwise, is responsible for this unusual occurrence. The triple association of chronic active hepatitis, granulomatous panniculitis and temporal arteritis has not been reported previously.

Frequency and significance of antibody to hepatitis C virus in severe corticosteroid-treated autoimmune chronic active hepatitis

To determine the frequency and significance of antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) in severe autoimmune chronic active hepatitis, we tested sera from 85 cortico-steroid-treated patients by an enzyme immunoassay. Seropositive patients were assessed for specific antibodies to hepatitis C virus-encoded antigens by recombinant immunoblot assay. The findings in patients with and without anti-HCV were contrasted, and the frequency of seropositivity was compared with that in patients who had other types of chronic liver disease and in normal adults. Only 5 of the 85 patients with autoimmune hepatitis (6%) were seropositive for anti-HCV, and only 2 of these patients were reactive by recombinant immunoblot assay. The frequency of seropositivity in autoimmune hepatitis was not significantly different from that in hepatitis B surface antigen-positive (9%) and cryptogenic (18%) disease, but it was significantly less than that in posttransfusion chronic active hepatitis (6% versus 75%; P less than 0.001). Two patients became seronegative after corticosteroid therapy; both had been nonreactive by recombinant immunoblot assay. Four of the seropositive patients entered remission during corticosteroid therapy, including three whose sera were nonreactive to virus-encoded antigens. We conclude that anti-HCV occurs infrequently in corticosteroid-treated severe autoimmune hepatitis and that antibodies detected by enzyme immunoassay may be nonreactive to hepatitis C virus-encoded antigens. Seropositive patients who are nonreactive by immunoblot assay may still respond to corticosteroid therapy and become seronegative during treatment.

Frequency and significance of antibody to hepatitis C virus in severe corticosteroid-treated cryptogenic chronic active hepatitis

To determine the frequency and significance of antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) in severe cryptogenic chronic active hepatitis (CAH), we tested sera from 17 corticosteroid-treated patients by an enzyme immunoassay. Specificity of the antibodies to HCV-encoded antigens was assessed by recombinant immunoblot assay. The findings in patients with and without anti-HCV were contrasted, and the frequency of seropositivity was compared with that in patients who had other types of chronic liver disease and in normal adults. Only three patients (18%) with severe cryptogenic CAH had anti-HCV. Sera from two of these patients were reactive by recombinant immunoblot assay; the other sample produced an indeterminate reaction. The frequency of seropositivity in patients with cryptogenic disease was not statistically different from that in patients with autoimmune CAH (6%), hepatitis B surface antigen-positive CAH (9%), or alcoholic liver disease (0%), but it was significantly less than in those with posttransfusion CAH (18% versus 75%; P less than 0.01). Seropositive patients tended to have lower serum aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-globulin, and bilirubin levels than seronegative counterparts, and they did not have histologic features of confluent necrosis at initial assessment. Two of the three seropositive patients, both of whom had been reactive by recombinant immunoblot assay, entered remission during therapy, and one, with an indeterminate reaction, died of liver failure. We conclude that anti-HCV occurs infrequently in severe corticosteroid-treated cryptogenic CAH. Seropositive patients may have less severe inflammatory activity than seronegative counterparts. Cryptogenic disease may improve during corticosteroid treatment, a result suggesting an underlying immunologic disorder in some patients.