Controlled-release Sinemet (CR-4): a double-blind crossover study in patients with fluctuating Parkinson's disease

Model-based optimization of controlled release formulation of levodopa for Parkinson's disease

Levodopa is currently the standard of care treatment for Parkinson's disease, but chronic therapy has been linked to motor complications. Designing a controlled release formulation (CRF) that maintains sustained and constant blood concentrations may reduce these complications. Still, it is challenging due to levodopa's pharmacokinetic properties and the notion that it is absorbed only in the upper small intestine (i.e., exhibits an "absorption window"). We created and validated a physiologically based mathematical model to aid the development of such a formulation. Analysis of experimental results using the model revealed that levodopa is well absorbed throughout the entire small intestine (i.e., no "absorption window") and that levodopa in the stomach causes fluctuations during the first 3 h after administration. Based on these insights, we developed guidelines for an improved CRF for various stages of Parkinson's disease. Such a formulation is expected to produce steady concentrations and prolong therapeutic duration compared to a common CRF with a smaller dose per day and a lower overall dose of levodopa, thereby improving patient compliance with the dosage regime.

Emerging Pharmacotherapies for Motor Symptoms in Parkinson's Disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second commonest neurodegenerative disorder in the older adult and is characterized by progressive disabling motor symptoms of bradykinesia, tremor, rigidity, postural instability and also non motor symptoms that affect quality of life. The pharmacotherapy of PD consists of oral, transdermal, and subcutaneous medications, as well as invasive advanced therapies at later stages of the disease. PD medications are often started as monotherapy but with the progression of the illness often there is a need to add more medications and frequently comprises of a challenging polypharmacotherapy. Adverse effects of pharmacotherapy often add to the problems of adequate treatment. Patients and physicians have to prioritize treatment goals on the most disabling symptoms and the safest and most effective treatments. Almost every year newer medications and modes of delivery continue to be researched and added to the therapeutic armamentarium. This review article outlines existing and emerging pharmacotherapies for motor symptoms in PD.

Common Myths and Misconceptions That Sidetrack Parkinson Disease Treatment, to the Detriment of Patients

Parkinson disease symptoms become apparent when there has been substantial loss of brain dopamine. That is the consequence of the slow progression of the Lewy body neurodegenerative process. Replenishment of brain dopamine with levodopa therapy dates back approximately a half century and continues to be the most efficacious symptomatic treatment. Understanding the fundamentals of levodopa treatment is crucial to therapeutic success. Various myths over the years have sabotaged treatment outcomes and have discouraged primary care physicians from managing patients with Parkinson disease. That is unfortunate because in some regions, neurologists, and in particular movement specialists, are in short supply. The long history of these persistent levodopa myths and the counterarguments are the focus of this article.

Medical Management and Prevention of Motor Complications in Parkinson's Disease

Levodopa is the most effective medication for the treatment of the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease. However, over time, the clinical response to levodopa becomes complicated by a reduction in the duration and reliability of motor improvement (motor fluctuations) and the emergence of involuntary movements (levodopa-induced dyskinesia). Strategies that have been attempted in an effort to delay the development of these motor complications include levodopa sparing and continuous dopaminergic therapy. Once motor complications occur, a wide array of medical treatments is available to maximize motor function through the day while limiting dyskinesia. Here, we review the clinical features, epidemiology, and risk factors for the development of motor complications, as well as strategies for their prevention and medical management.

Hospital Management of Parkinson Disease Patients

Management of patients with Parkinson disease (PD) during inpatient hospital stays is complex and poses unique challenges for physicians and ancillary staff. Patients with PD have a high risk of complications, encephalopathy, and prolonged hospital stay. Early recognition of complications and implementation of rehabilitation strategies along with appropriate management of medications are critical to improve outcomes. Patients with PD can exhibit worsening mobility and balance, insomnia, orthostatic hypotension, multiple neuropsychiatric symptoms, and gastrointestinal dysfunction while hospitalized. This review summarizes the specific in-hospital concerns observed in patients with PD and discusses potential treatment approaches.

Pharmacokinetics of Rytary®, An Extended-Release Capsule Formulation of Carbidopa-Levodopa

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a chronic progressive neurological disorder characterized by resting tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia, gait disturbance, and postural instability. Levodopa, the precursor to dopamine, coadministered with carbidopa or benserazide, aromatic amino acid decarboxylase inhibitors, is the most effective and widely used therapeutic agent in the treatment of PD. With continued levodopa treatment, a majority of patients develop motor complications such as dyskinesia and motor 'on-off' fluctuations, which are, in part, related to the fluctuations in plasma concentrations of levodopa. A new extended-release (ER) carbidopa-levodopa capsule product (also referred to as IPX066) was developed and approved in the US as Rytary^® and in the EU as Numient^®. The capsule formulation is designed to provide an initial rapid absorption of levodopa comparable to immediate-release (IR) carbidopa-levodopa, and to subsequently provide stable levodopa concentrations with reduced peak-to-trough excursions in plasma concentrations in order to reduce motor fluctuations associated with pulsatile stimulation of dopamine receptors and to minimize dyskinesia. Phase III studies of this ER carbidopa-levodopa capsule formulation in patients with PD have shown a significant reduction in 'off' time compared with IR carbidopa-levodopa and carbidopa-levodopa-entacapone. We present a review of the clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of this ER product of carbidopa-levodopa in healthy subjects and in patients with PD.

Levodopa in Parkinson's Disease: Current Status and Future Developments

BACKGROUND

Ever since the pioneering reports in the 60s, L-3,4-Dioxyphenylalanine (levodopa) has represented the gold standard for the treatment of Parkinson's Disease (PD). However, long-term levodopa (LD) treatment is frequently associated with fluctuations in motor response with serious impact on patient quality of life. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of LD are pivotal to such motor fluctuations: discontinuous drug delivery, short half-life, poor bioavailability, and narrow therapeutic window are all crucial for such fluctuations. During the last 60 years, several attempts have been made to improve LD treatment and avoid long-term complications.

METHODS

Research and trials to improve the LD pharmacokinetic since 1960s are reviewed, summarizing the progressive improvements of LD treatment.

RESULTS

Inhibitors of peripheral amino acid decarboxylase (AADC) have been introduced to achieve proper LD concentration in the central nervous system reducing systemic adverse events. Inhibitors of catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) increased LD half-life and bioavailability. Efforts are still being made to achieve a continuous dopaminergic stimulation, with the combination of oral LD with an AADC inhibitor and a COMT inhibitor, or the intra-duodenal water-based LD/ carbidopa gel. Further approaches to enhance LD efficacy are focused on new non-oral administration routes, including nasal, intra-duodenal, intrapulmonary (CVT-301) and subcutaneous (ND0612), as well as on novel ER formulations, including IPX066, which recently concluded phase III trial.

CONCLUSION

New LD formulations, oral compounds as well as routes have been tested in the last years, with two main targets: achieve continuous dopaminergic stimulation and find an instant deliver route for LD.

Optimizing extended-release carbidopa/levodopa in Parkinson disease: Consensus on conversion from standard therapy

Purpose of review:

To help clinicians optimize the conversion of a patient's Parkinson disease pharmacotherapy from immediate-release carbidopa/levodopa (IR CD/LD) to an extended-release formulation (ER CD/LD).

Recent findings:

Eleven movement disorders specialists achieved consensus positions on the modification of trial-based conversion guidelines to suit individual patients in clinical practice.

Summary:

Because the pharmacokinetics of ER CD/LD differ from those of IR CD/LD, modification of dosage and dosing frequency are to be expected. Initial regimens may be based on doubling the patient's preconversion levodopa daily dosage and choosing a division of doses to address the patient's motor complications, e.g., wearing-off (warranting a relatively high ER CD/LD dose, possibly at a lower frequency than for IR CD/LD) or dyskinesia (warranting a relatively low dose, perhaps at an unchanged frequency). Patients should know that the main goal of conversion is a steadier levodopa clinical response, even if dosing frequency is unchanged.

Conversion to IPX066 from Standard Levodopa Formulations in Advanced Parkinson's Disease: Experience in Clinical Trials

Background:

Due to the short half-life of levodopa, immediate-release carbidopa-levodopa (IR CD-LD) produces fluctuating LD concentrations, contributing to a risk of eventual motor complications. IPX066 was designed to rapidly attain therapeutic LD concentrations and maintain them to allow a dosing interval of ∼6 hours.

Objective:

To extensively analyze the dosing data collected in IPX066 studies during open-label conversions from IR CD-LD alone or with entacapone (CLE) and identify patterns relevant for managing conversion in the clinical setting.

Methods:

Patients had ≥2.5 hours/day of “off” time despite a stable IR or CLE regimen. Suggested initial dosing conversion tables based on prior LD daily dosage were provided.

Results:

Of 450 patients previously treated with IR CD-LD and 110 with CLE, 87.3% and 82.7% completed conversion to IPX066, respectively. At the end of conversion, average IPX066 LD daily dosages were higher than pre-conversion dosages, with a mean conversion ratio of 2.1±0.6 for IR CD-LD and 2.8±0.8 for CLE; >90% of patients took IPX066 3 or 4 times/day, compared with a median of 5 times/day at baseline in both studies. After conversion, daily “off” time significantly decreased, with no significant increase in troublesome dyskinesia. The most common adverse event reported during conversion was nausea, with an incidence of 5.3% for conversion from IR and 7.3% from CLE.

Conclusions:

Among PD patients with substantial “off” time, a majority were safely converted to IPX066. The sustained LD profile from the IPX066 formulation allowed an increase in LD dose accompanied by improved motor functions, without increased troublesome dyskinesia.

Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of an oral extended-release capsule formulation of carbidopa-levodopa (IPX066) with immediate-release carbidopa-levodopa (Sinemet(®)), sustained-release carbidopa-levodopa (Sinemet(®) CR), and carbidopa-levodopa-entacapone (Stalevo(®))

IPX066 (extended‐release carbidopa‐levodopa [ER CD‐LD]) is an oral extended‐release capsule formulation of carbidopa and levodopa. The single‐dose pharmacokinetics of ER CD‐LD (as 2 capsules; total dose, 97.5 mg‐390 mg CD‐LD) versus immediate‐release (IR) CD‐LD (25 mg‐100 mg), sustained‐release (CR) CD‐LD (25 mg‐100 mg), and CD‐LD‐entacapone (25 mg‐100 mg‐200 mg) was evaluated in healthy subjects. Following IR dosing, LD reached peak concentrations (C_max) at 1 hour; LD concentrations then decreased rapidly and were less than 10% of peak by 5 hours. With CR CD‐LD and CD‐LD‐entacapone, LD C_max occurred at 1.5 hours, and concentrations were less than 10% of peak by 6.3 and 7.5 hours, respectively. The initial increase in LD concentration was similar between ER CD‐LD and IR CD‐LD and faster than for CR CD‐LD and CD‐LD‐entacapone. LD concentrations from ER CD­­‐LD were sustained for approximately 5 hours and did not decrease to 10% of peak until 10.1 hours. Dose‐normalized LD C_max values for ER CD‐LD were significantly lower (P< .05) than for the other CD‐LD products. Bioavailability of LD from ER CD‐LD was 83.5%, 78.3%, and 58.8% relative to IR CD‐LD, CR CD‐LD, and CD‐LD‐entacapone, respectively.

Long-Term Treatment with Extended-Release Carbidopa-Levodopa (IPX066) in Early and Advanced Parkinson's Disease: A 9-Month Open-Label Extension Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

IPX066 is a multiparticulate extended-release formulation of carbidopa-levodopa, designed to produce prolonged therapeutic levodopa plasma concentrations. This 9-month open-label extension study assessed its long-term safety and clinical utility in early and advanced Parkinson's disease (PD).

METHODS

Participants were enrolled from two phase III IPX066 studies and one open-label phase II study. Early PD patients were titrated to an appropriate dosing regimen while advanced patients started with regimens established in the antecedent studies. Adjustment was allowed throughout the extension. Clinical utility measures included the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and Patient Global Impression (PGI) ratings.

RESULTS

Among 268 early PD patients, 53.4 % reported adverse events (AEs) and 1.1 % (three patients) discontinued due to AEs; the most frequent AEs were nausea (5.6 %) and insomnia (5.6 %). Among 349 advanced patients, 60.2 % reported AEs and 3.7 % (13 patients) discontinued due to AEs; the most frequent AEs were dyskinesia (6.9 %) and fall (6.6 %). At month 9 (or early termination), 78.3 % of early patients were taking IPX066 three times daily (median: 720 mg/day) and 87.7 % of advanced patients were taking IPX066 three or four times daily (median: 1450 mg/day). Adjusting for 70 % bioavailability relative to immediate-release (IR) carbidopa-levodopa, the median dosages correspond to ~500 and ~1015 mg/day of IR levodopa in early and advanced PD, respectively. Based on the plasma profiles previously observed in PD patients, the IPX066 regimens in the extension can be estimated to provide a levodopa Cmax (maximum plasma drug concentration) similar to or lower than that provided by IR regimens during the antecedent trials. UPDRS and PGI findings showed sustained treatment effects throughout the extension.

CONCLUSION

During 9 months of extended use, IPX066 exhibited a safety/tolerability profile consistent with dopaminergic PD therapy.

Pharmacological strategies for the management of levodopa-induced dyskinesia in patients with Parkinson's disease

L-Dopa-induced dyskinesias (LID) are the most common adverse effects of long-term dopaminergic therapy in Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the exact mechanisms underlying dyskinesia are still unclear. For a long time, nigrostriatal degeneration and pulsatile stimulation of striatal postsynaptic receptors have been highlighted as the key factors for the development of LID. In recent years, PD models have revealed a wide range of non-dopaminergic neurotransmitter systems involved in pre- and postsynaptic changes and thereby contributing to the pathophysiology of LID. In the current review, we focus on therapeutic LID targets, mainly based on agents acting on dopaminergic, glutamatergic, serotoninergic, adrenergic, and cholinergic systems. Despite a large number of clinical trials, currently only amantadine and, to a lesser extent, clozapine are being used as effective strategies in the treatment of LID in clinical settings. Thus, in the second part of the article, we review the placebo-controlled trials on LID treatment in order to disentangle the changing scenario of drug development. Promising results include the extension of L-dopa action without inducing LID of the novel monoamine oxidase B- and glutamate-release inhibitor safinamide; however, this had no obvious effect on existing LID. Others, like the metabotropic glutamate-receptor antagonist AFQ056, showed promising results in some of the studies; however, confirmation is still lacking. Thus, to date, strategies of continuous dopaminergic stimulation seem the most promising to prevent or ameliorate LID. The success of future therapeutic strategies once moderate to severe LID occur will depend on the translation from preclinical experimental models into clinical practice in a bidirectional process.

Parkinson disease treatment in hospitals and nursing facilities: avoiding pitfalls

The unique needs of patients with Parkinson disease challenge staff when such patients are admitted to hospitals or nursing facilities. Prolongation of the hospital stay, falls with injuries, fainting, or declining motor function may result from therapeutic misadventures or failure to anticipate common problems. Staff familiarity with Parkinson disease, and especially carbidopa-levodopa dosing and dynamics, may prevent such problems and streamline hospital and nursing home care.

Summary of the recommendations of the EFNS/MDS-ES review on therapeutic management of Parkinson's disease

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the 2010 EFNS/MDS-ES evidence-based treatment recommendations for the management of Parkinson's disease (PD). This summary includes the treatment recommendations for early and late PD.

METHODS

For the 2010 publication, a literature search was undertaken for articles published up to September 2009. For this summary, an additional literature search was undertaken up to December 2010. Classification of scientific evidence and the rating of recommendations were made according to the EFNS guidance. In cases where there was insufficient scientific evidence, a consensus statement ('good practice point') is made.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

For each clinical indication, a list of therapeutic interventions is provided, including classification of evidence.

Management of motor and non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder that affects approximately 1 % of people over the age of 60 years. Accurate diagnosis and individualized assessment of the risks and benefits of available antiparkinsonian medications as well as specific clinical features and the phase of disease should guide treatment for patients with PD. Levodopa still remains the gold standard for the treatment of motor symptoms of PD but dopamine agonists (DAs), catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitors and monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) inhibitors have also been developed to provide more continuous oral delivery of dopaminergic stimulation in order to improve motor outcomes and decrease the risk of levodopa-induced motor complications. Deep-brain stimulation as well as other invasive therapies can be used for the treatment of drug-refractory levodopa-induced motor complications. Despite all of the therapeutic advances achieved within the last 20 years, PD continues to be a progressive disorder leading to severe disability caused by motor and non-motor symptoms. To date, neuroprotective interventions able to modify PD progression are not available. This review focuses on medical and invasive treatment strategies for early and advanced stages of PD as well as on the treatment of PD non-motor symptoms such as mood and behavioural disorders, cognitive and autonomic dysfunction, and sleep disorders, which can antedate PD motor symptoms for years.

Cheaper, simpler, and better: tips for treating seniors with Parkinson disease

Treatment of seniors with Parkinson disease is within the domain of primary care physicians and internists. A good working knowledge of carbidopa/levodopa principles should allow excellent care of most patients, at least during the early years of the disease. Even later, when levodopa responses become more complicated (eg, dyskinesias, motor fluctuations, insomnia, anxiety), levodopa adjustments may be all that is necessary. A dozen tips for optimizing treatment of Parkinson disease are discussed herein.

Seniors with Parkinson's disease: initial medical treatment

Parkinson's disease most often presents after age 60, and patients in this age group are best managed with levodopa therapy as the primary treatment modality. Unlike young-onset parkinsonism (onset <age 40), this older age group is much less prone to subsequent development of levodopa responsive instability (dyskinesias, fluctuations). When these problems do occur in seniors, they usually can be managed by medication adjustments. The treatment goal is to keep patients active and engaged; levodopa dosage should be guided by the patients' responses and not arbitrarily limited to low doses, which may compromise patients' lives.

Medical management of motor fluctuations

Given the magnitude of the problem of motor fluctuations in patients who have Parkinson's disease treated with levodopa, a significant effort has been expended by physicians, researchers, and pharmaceutical manufacturers over the years to find effective treatments. This article briefly reviews the medical options for managing motor fluctuations that are in common use in the United States or that are expected to be available soon.

Motor complications in Parkinson disease: Clinical manifestations and management

Long-term dopaminomimetic therapy, not limited to levodopa, is complicated by the emergence of variations of motor response in a majority of Parkinson disease (PD) patients. These variations can occur in different forms, as early wearing off during the initial stage of motor complications, dyskinesias in the intermediate stage, and complex fluctuations in the advanced stage. Considered to be a major source of disability in advanced PD patients, recognition of these complications is critical in order to develop different strategies designed not only to treat these problems when they develop, but also to prevent troublesome complications associated with potential risk factors. In this article, authors classify a wide clinical spectrum of motor complications into different stages as the disease progresses through the treatment. A number of strategies are proposed in order to manage these complications as well as to avoid them. Better understanding of these potential complications will result in better management of these problems and lessen the disability associated with advanced PD.

Review of the therapeutic management of Parkinson's disease. Report of a joint task force of the European Federation of Neurological Societies (EFNS) and the Movement Disorder Society-European Section (MDS-ES). Part II: late (complicated) Parkinson's disease

To provide evidence-based recommendations for the management of late (complicated) Parkinson's disease (PD), based on a review of the literature. Complicated PD refers to patients suffering from the classical motor syndrome of PD along with other motor or non-motor complications, either disease-related (e.g. freezing) or treatment-related (e.g. dyskinesias or hallucinations). MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and INAHTA database literature searches were conducted. National guidelines were requested from all EFNS societies. Non-European guidelines were searched for using MEDLINE. Part II of the guidelines deals with treatment of motor and neuropsychiatric complications and autonomic disturbances. For each topic, a list of therapeutic interventions is provided, including classification of evidence. Following this, recommendations for management are given, alongside ratings of efficacy. Classifications of evidence and ratings of efficacy are made according to EFNS guidance. In cases where there is insufficient scientific evidence, a consensus statement ('good practice point') is made.

Medical management of advanced Parkinson's disease

The management of advancing Parkinson's disease (PD) is a daunting task, complicated by dynamic medication responses, side effects, and treatment-refractory symptoms in an aging patient population. The motor and nonmotor complications of advancing PD are reviewed, and practical treatment strategies are provided. Careful assessment in the context of the known natural history of advancing PD and rational treatment choices can create significant improvement in the lives of patients who have advancing PD.

Treatment of Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that demands a holistic approach to treatment. Both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions play an important role in the comprehensive management of this disorder. While levodopa remains the single most effective medication for symptomatic treatment, dopamine agonists are playing an increasingly important role. Motor complications of dopaminergic therapy are a significant issue, particularly in patients with more advanced disease who have been on levodopa for several years. All therapeutic interventions must be tailored to the individual and modified as the disease progresses, with the goal of minimizing significant functional disability as much as possible.

Medical treatment of later-stage motor problems of Parkinson disease

Parkinson disease progression is associated with the development of levodopa short-duration responses and dyskinesias, as well as gait freezing. Levodopa dose adjustment and adjunctive treatment with dopamine agonists form the major therapeutic strategies. Catechol O-methyltransferase inhibitors are also appropriate considerations, whereas other drugs, including selegiline, amantadine, anticholinergic agents, and propranolol, have a more minor role.

Parkinson's Disease: Motor Fluctuations

Motor fluctuations represent important late complications of Parkinson's disease treated with levodopa. Although treatment of these problems has improved with the emergence of numerous pharmacologic and surgical therapies, the various options can make it confusing. Pharmacologic treatment is the first step. Polytherapy is often the rule in this case with a variety of agents available as adjunctive therapy with levodopa. These adjuncts include dopamine agonists (bromocriptine, pergolide, pramipexole, ropinirole), catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitors (tolcapone), controlled-release formulations of levodopa, monoamine oxidase (MAO) B inhibitors (selegiline), and amantadine. The treatment can consist of any of a number of combinations of these agents. No single algorithm can be used in all patients; therapy should be individualized. Physicians treating these patients need to be well versed in late complication patterns as well as the medications chosen. In addition, optimal doses vary, and often patients are considered treatment failures and taken off medications before reaching that level. In the more complicated cases, patients should be evaluated by specialists in movement disorders. With this in mind, some guidelines are offered for the pharmacologic approach to patients with fluctuating responses to medications. For simple wearing off, controlled-release levodopa (Sinemet CR, Dupont Pharmaceuticals, Wilmington, DE), COMT inhibitors, MAO inhibitors, and dopamine agonists are reasonable options. For more complicated fluctuations, dopamine agonists with limits on levodopa are the first choice, especially when dyskinesia is present; when dyskinesia is not a factor, COMT inhibitors may be used. For dyskinesia specifically, dopamine agonists or addition of amantadine can be helpful. Surgery should be a treatment of last resort for patients in whom medical therapy fails. Patients who are candidates for medial pallidotomy should be fluctuators with severe dyskinesia and "off" periods that have not improved with pharmacologic therapy. Thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) should be used only in patients with tremor-predominant disease and severe intractable tremor that is unresponsive to medication and occurs not only at rest but with posture and action as well. Surgical therapy should be performed only in centers with surgeons experienced in stereotactic techniques and movement disorder specialists to ensure that the appropriate patients come to surgery and that complications are kept to a minimum. Dietary adjustment has a limited role in treating advanced Parkinson's disease.

Entacapone improves motor fluctuations in levodopa-treated Parkinson's disease patients. Parkinson Study Group

Motor fluctuations associated with levodopa therapy are common problems encountered in the long-term treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). Entacapone, a peripherally acting, reversible inhibitor of catechol-O-methyltransferase, slows the elimination of levodopa in humans by reducing the formation of 3-O-methyldopa. We conducted a placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter trial of entacapone in PD patients with motor fluctuations. Two hundred five patients were randomized to receive either entacapone 200 mg or matching placebo with each dose of levodopa and were followed for 24 weeks. The primary measure of efficacy was the change in percentage of "on" time (relief of parkinsonism) while awake, as recorded by subjects at home in diaries completed at 30-minute intervals. At baseline, patients averaged approximately 10 hours of "on" time per day while awake (60.5% "on" time), and entacapone treatment increased the percent "on" time by 5.0 percentage points. The effect of entacapone was more prominent in patients with a smaller percent "on" time (<55%) at baseline, and increased as the day wore on. Entacapone is effective at increasing the duration of response to levodopa and at relieving parkinsonism in patients experiencing motor fluctuations and was well tolerated during the 24 weeks of treatment.

Treatment of early Parkinson's disease: are complicated strategies justified?

A variety of medical treatment strategies have been proposed as a means of slowing the progression of Parkinson's disease. This includes administration of selegiline (deprenyl) therapy, early use of bromocriptine or pergolide, and delay of levodopa therapy or restriction of the dose. There is no compelling evidence supporting the use of any of these treatment strategies for this purpose. Carbidopa-levodopa remains the most potent medication for symptomatic treatment of Parkinson's disease. Although starting levodopa therapy with the controlled-release formulation is advocated, this does not appear to have any major advantages over standard carbidopa-levodopa. Further studies are needed to identify other means of halting the progression of Parkinson's disease.

Long-term evaluation of Sinemet CR in parkinsonian patients with motor fluctuations

The safety and efficacy of Sinemet CR, a controlled-release formulation of carbidopa/levodopa, were investigated in a three year, open-label trial involving 18 parkinsonian patients with fluctuating motor response. The average daily levodopa dosing frequency did not change significantly during long-term treatment. Efficacy measures generally revealed a gradual progression of parkinsonian disability. Patient diaries of motor fluctuations revealed relative stability of time "on" but with a tendency toward increased time "on with dyskinesias" over the 36 month follow-up period. There were no adverse laboratory results deemed to be related to Sinemet CR and no unexpected side effects were observed.

Sinemet (CR4): an open-label study in moderately severe Parkinson's disease

Almost all patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease respond to levodopa and progress steadily, requiring an increased overall dosage with time. Sinemet CR4 offers a theoretically attractive method of achieving gradual sustained release of levodopa over time which may be more physiological to striatal dopamine receptors in the early stages of the disease. This study evaluated 20 patients with moderate to severe Parkinson's disease who were treated with Sinemet CR4 over a 1-year period. Eleven patients completed the full year on therapy, and nine subjects withdrew. Of the withdrawals, two subjects died from non-Parkinson's disease-related illness, three showed no therapeutic benefit, and four responded well for a minimal 6-month period, but then lost therapeutic benefit and developed more severe dystonias. A higher overall levodopa dosage was required by all patients, and side-effects of levodopa were still present in most patients. However, the nocturnal benefit of this long-acting preparation was observed by all the patients in the study. Slow onset of action of Sinemet CR4 resulted in early-morning immobility. Sinemet CR4 cannot replace standard Sinemet, but appears to be a useful form of adjunct therapy in selected patients.

Controlled release levodopa/carbidopa (Sinemet CR4) in Parkinson's disease--an open evaluation of efficacy and safety

Twenty patients with moderately severe Parkinson's disease entered an open study of the efficacy and safety of a slow release preparation containing levodopa 200 mg and carbidopa 50 mg per tablet ('Sinemet CR4'). Following an initial four week baseline stabilisation period on conventional 'Sinemet' tablets, the patients were transferred to 'Sinemet CR4' and observed at intervals over the next 12 months. Fifteen patients completed the full year observation period. When compared with the baseline period, treatment with 'Sinemet CR4' was associated with longer periods of functional improvement and less fluctuation of response following each dose. The median (range) dose frequency was reduced from three (three-12) to two (two-seven) times daily (p less than 0.001) on 'Sinemet CR4' although median (range) total daily dose of levodopa was increased from 700 (375-2525) to 800 (400-2800) mg without any increase in adverse effects. Three patients developed peripheral neuropathy while receiving Sinemet CR4, but the association with this therapy is unclear. Overall 'Sinemet CR4' allowed a longer dosage interval and provided more stable control of disease manifestations than conventional 'Sinemet'.

Results of long-term treatment with controlled-release levodopa/carbidopa (Sinemet CR)

35 Parkinson's disease patients with motor response fluctuations (RF) participated in controlled clinical trials comparing Sinemet CR to Standard Sinemet (STD) at our institutions. 13 of 25 eligible patients continued to two years (the longest possible follow-up from the second study), and 5 of 11 have continued taking CR up to 4 years. At the end of both two and four years, patients were taking significantly fewer medication doses, with a significantly longer interdose interval, and up to two years, experienced fewer "off" periods than when on Standard Sinemet (STD) alone. Most patients required STD at at least one dose each day to hasten to onset of antiparkinson effect. Sinemet CR is a useful adjunct in the long-term management of motor response fluctuations in Parkinson's disease.