Cefepime

Acute kidney injury is associated with abnormal cefepime exposure among critically ill children and young adults

BACKGROUND

Elevated cefepime blood concentrations can cause neurotoxicity in adults. The consequences of elevated cefepime concentrations among pediatric patients are unknown. Future exploration of such effects requires first identifying patients at risk for elevated cefepime exposure. We investigated the role of acute kidney injury as a risk factor for increased cefepime concentrations in critically ill children.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis at a single pediatric intensive care unit. Analyzed patients received at least 24 h of cefepime and had at least two opportunistic samples collected for total cefepime concentration measurement. Individual pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles during treatment courses were reconstructed using Bayesian estimation with an established population PK model. Elevated trough concentration (Cmin) was defined as ≥ 30 mg/L based on adult toxicity studies. The effect of kidney dysfunction on cefepime PK profiles was interrogated using a mixed-effect model.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven patients were included, of which 13 (14.9%) had at least one estimated Cmin ≥ 30 mg/L. Patients with elevated Cmin were more likely to have acute kidney injury (AKI) during their critical illness (92% vs. 57%, p = 0.015 for any AKI; 62% vs. 26%, p = 0.019 for severe AKI). Patients who had AKI during critical illness had significantly higher cefepime exposure, as quantified by the area under the concentration-time curve over 24 h (AUC24h) and Cmin.

CONCLUSIONS

Among critically ill children, AKI is associated with elevated cefepime concentrations. Identifying these high-risk patients is the first step toward evaluating the clinical consequences of such exposures.

A review on current advancement in zebrafish models to study chronic inflammatory diseases and their therapeutic targets

Chronic inflammatory diseases are caused due to prolonged inflammation at a specific site of the body. Among other inflammatory diseases, bacterial meningitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), atherosclerosis and inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are primarily focused on because of their adverse effects and fatality rates around the globe in recent times. In order to come up with novel strategies to eradicate these diseases, a clear understanding of the mechanisms of the diseases is needed. Similarly, detailed insight into the mechanisms of commercially available drugs and potent lead compounds from natural sources are also important to establish efficient therapeutic effects. Zebrafish is widely accepted as a model to study drug toxicity and the pharmacokinetic effects of the drug. Moreover, researchers use various inducers to trigger inflammatory cascades and stimulate physiological changes in zebrafish. The effect of these inducers contrasts with the type of zebrafish used in the investigation. Hence, a thorough analysis is required to study the current advancements in the zebrafish model for chronic inflammatory disease suppression. This review presents the most common inflammatory diseases, commercially available drugs, novel therapeutics, and their mechanisms of action for disease suppression. The review also provides a detailed description of various zebrafish models for these diseases. Finally, the future prospects and challenges for the same are described, which can help the researchers understand the potency of the zebrafish model and its further exploration for disease attenuation.

Cefepime Population Pharmacokinetics, Antibacterial Target Attainment, and Estimated Probability of Neurotoxicity in Critically Ill Patients

Cefepime has been reported to cause concentration-related neurotoxicity, especially in critically ill patients with renal failure. This evaluation aimed to identify a dosing regimen providing a sufficient probability of target attainment (PTA) and the lowest justifiable risk of neurotoxicity in critically ill patients. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed based on plasma concentrations over four consecutive days obtained from 14 intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The patients received a median dose of 2,000 mg cefepime by 30-min intravenous infusions with dosing intervals of every 8 h (q8h) to q24h. A time that the free drug concentration exceeds the MIC over the dosing interval (fT>MIC) of 65% and an fT>2×MIC of 100% were defined as treatment targets. Monte Carlo simulations were carried out to identify a dosing regimen for a PTA of 90% and a probability of neurotoxicity not exceeding 20%. A two-compartment model with linear elimination best described the data. Estimated creatinine clearance was significantly related to the clearance of cefepime in nondialysis patients. Interoccasion variability on clearance improved the model, reflecting dynamic clearance changes. The evaluations suggested combining thrice-daily administration as an appropriate choice. In patients with normal renal function (creatinine clearance, 120 mL/min), for the pharmacodynamics target of 100% fT>2×MIC and a PTA of 90%, a dose of 1,333 mg q8h was found to be related to a probability of neurotoxicity of ≤20% and to cover MICs up to 2 mg/L. Continuous infusion appears to be superior to other dosing regimens by providing higher efficacy and a low risk of neurotoxicity. The model makes it possible to improve the predicted balance between cefepime efficacy and neurotoxicity in critically ill patients. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01793012).

Cefepime Dosing Requirements in Elderly Patients Attended in the Emergency Rooms

Objective

This study aimed to assess the probability of reaching an adequate pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (pK/pD) index for different cefepime dosages in frail patients with bacteremia treated in the emergency room.

Methods

Simulation study based on Gram-negative bacterial strains that cause bacteremia. The probability of reaching a time above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) at 50% and 100% dosing intervals (fT > 50 and fT > 80% MIC) was assessed for two different renal clearance intervals.

Results

One hundred twenty nine strains were collected, the predominant species being Escherichia coli (n = 83 [64.3%]). In patients with a ClCr of 30 mL/min, an fT > 50% MIC was reached in more than 90% of the simulations. However, a dose of at least 1 g every 12 h must be administered to reach an fT > 80% MIC. In patients with a ClCr of 30–60 mL/min, the probability of reaching an fT > 50% MIC was higher than 90% with doses of 1 g every 8 h or more, but this value was not reached in > 90% simulations for any of the doses tested in this study.

Conclusions

Standard cefepime dosing can reach an adequate PK/PD index in frail patients. Nevertheless, a high dose or extended infusion is necessary to reach an fT > 80% MIC in patients with a ClCr > 60 mL/min.

An update on cefepime and its future role in combination with novel β-lactamase inhibitors for MDR Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Cefepime, a wide-spectrum β-lactam antibiotic, has been in use for the treatment of serious bacterial infections for almost 25 years. Since its clinical development, there has been a dramatic shift in its dosing, with 2 g every 8 hours being preferred for serious infections to optimize pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic considerations. The advent of ESBLs has become a threat to its ongoing use, although future coadministration with β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) under development is an area of intense study. There are currently four new cefepime/BLI combinations in clinical development. Cefepime/zidebactam is generally active against MBL-producing Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, in vitro and in animal studies, and cefepime/taniborbactam has activity against KPC and OXA-48 producers. Cefepime/enmetazobactam and cefepime/tazobactam are potential carbapenem-sparing agents with activity against ESBLs. Cefepime/enmetazobactam has completed Phase III and cefepime/taniborbactam is in Phase III clinical studies, where they are being tested against carbapenems or piperacillin/tazobactam for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections. While these combinations are promising, their role in the treatment of MDR Gram-negative infections can only be determined with further clinical studies.

Preparation and Characterization of New Liposomes. Bactericidal Activity of Cefepime Encapsulated into Cationic Liposomes

Cefepime is an antibiotic with a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity. However, this antibiotic has several side effects and a high degradation rate. For this reason, the preparation and characterization of new liposomes that are able to encapsulate this antibiotic seem to be an important research line in the pharmaceutical industry. Anionic and cationic liposomes were prepared and characterized. All cationic structures contained the same cationic surfactant, N,N,N-triethyl-N-(12-naphthoxydodecyl)ammonium. Results showed a better encapsulation-efficiency percentage (EE%) of cefepime in liposomes with phosphatidylcholine and cholesterol than with 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (DOPE). The presence of cholesterol and the quantity of egg-yolk phospholipid in the liposome increased the encapsulation percentage. The bactericidal activity against Escherichia coli of cefepime loaded into liposomes with phosphatidylcholine was measured. The inhibitory zone in an agar plate for free cefepime was similar to that obtained for loaded cefepime. The growth-rate constant of E. coli culture was also measured in working conditions. The liposome without any antibiotic exerted no influence in such a rate constant. All obtained results suggest that PC:CH:12NBr liposomes are biocompatible nanocarriers of cefepime that can be used in bacterial infections against Escherichia coli with high inhibitory activity.

A Case of Polymicrobial Bacteremia in a Patient Undergoing Chemotherapy

We report an aggressive case of polymicrobial bacteremia in a patient with renal pelvis carcinoma. A 76-year-old man developed watery diarrhea after undergoing chemotherapy. He became unconscious and went into shock. Laboratory data showed severe neutropenia, renal failure, and lactic acidosis. Chest radiography showed multiple opacities. He died despite aggressive fluid resuscitation, catecholamine administration, antibiotic treatment, and mechanical ventilation. Blood culture isolates included Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Moraxella catarrhalis. The foci of bacteremia were the respiratory tract and the bowel. The two infection foci and polymicrobial bacteremia are thought to be associated with the patient’s poor prognosis. Although polymicrobial bacteremia is rare, awareness of this condition and of the rare causative pathogens, such as A. baumannii and M. catarrhalis, especially in patients with comorbidities and immunosuppression will help treat the patients with bacteremia.

Ceftiofur pharmacokinetics in Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus after intracardiac and intramuscular administrations

Ceftiofur is a broad-spectrum third generation cephalosporin, which acts by inhibiting bacterial cell wall synthesis. It is active against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria such as Aeromonas hydrophila and β-lactamase-producing strains, which are common pathogens in freshwater fish. Ceftiofur pharmacokinetics in Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus were studied following single intracardiac (i.c.) or intramuscular (i.m.) administration of ceftiofur sodium (NAXCEL®) in a dose of 5 mg ceftiofur kg-1 body weight. After i.c. injection, ceftiofur plasma concentrations decreased biexponentially, suggesting a 2-compartmental open model. Distribution and elimination half-lives (t0.5(α) and t0.5(β)) were 0.61 ± 0.22 and 0.14 ± 0.03 h mean ±SD, respectively. Elimination constant (Kel) and total body clearances (Cltot) were 3.22 ± 0.48 h-1 and 1.64 ± 0.47 l h-1 kg-1, respectively. Volume of distribution (Vss) and areas under curves (AUC) were 0.12 ± 0.03 l kg-1 and 24.18 ± 8.81 µg ml-1 h, respectively. Following i.m. injection of ceftiofur, plasma concentrations were best described by a 1-compartment open model with a first order absorption; bioavailability was quite high (96.85 ± 23.74%). Plasma maximum concentration (Cmax) was 12.32 ± 6.53 µg ml-1; achieved at time of maximum concentration (Tmax) of 0.74 ± 0.04 h. Absorption and elimination half-lives (t0.5ab and t0.5β) were 0.49 ± 0.06 and 0.53 ± 0.03 h, respectively. In conclusion, i.m. injection of ceftiofur sodium produced extremely high bioavailability with high plasma concentrations that persisted up to 6 h post injection, which may make ceftiofur a useful alternative antibiotic for treatment of brood stock or important ornamental fishes.

Cefepime, a fourth-generation cephalosporin, in complex with manganese, inhibits proteasome activity and induces the apoptosis of human breast cancer cells

Cefepime (FEP), which is a member of the fourth-generation cephalosporin class, has been extensively studied as a biochemical and antimicrobial reagent in recent years. Manganese (Mn) is important in the biochemical and physiological processes of many living organisms, and it is also high expressed in some tumor tissues. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the proteasome-inhibitory and anti-proliferative properties of 8 metal complexes (FEP‑Cu, FEP-Zn, FEP-Co, FEP-Ni, FEP-Cd, FEP-Cr, FEP-Fe, FEP-Mn) in MDA-MB‑231 human breast cancer cells. The FEP-Mn complex was found to be more potent in its ability to inhibit cell proliferation and proteasome activity than the other compounds tested. Moreover, the FEP-Mn complex inhibited proteasomal chymotrypsin-like (CT-like) activity and induced the apoptosis of breast cancer cells in a dose-and time-dependent manner. Furthermore, the MCF-10A cells were much less sensitive to the FEP complexes compared with the MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. These results demonstrated that the FEP-Mn(II) complex has the potential to act as a proteasome inhibitor and apoptosis inducer and therefore has possible future applications in cancer chemotherapy.

Evaluation of efficacy and tolerability of cefotaxime and sulbactam versus cefepime and tazobactam in patients of urinary tract infection-a prospective comparative study

OBJECTIVE

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is the third most common infection experienced by humans after respiratory and gastro-intestinal infections. Cephalosporins are now widely been used in UTI, but emerging resistance is a problem to that. Our study aims at evaluating efficacy and safety of third generation cephalosporin combined with beta lactamase inhibitors compared with fourth generation cephalosporin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present, open, randomised, parallel group comparative study includes 60 patients of urinary tract infection. Group A patient were put on treatment regimen of cefotaxime and sulbactam (0.5-2 gms IV/IM BD) and Group B patients were prescribed cefepime and tazobactam (0.5-1 gm IV/IM BD) depending upon urine culture and sensitivity pattern of causative agent and condition of the patient. Bacteriological cure rate, clinical cure rate will be assessed for efficacy and adverse drug reaction (ADR) recorded for evaluating safety.

RESULTS

The study showed a male predominance with 37 males (61.6%) and 23 (38.4%) females out of the total 60 patients with a maximum number within the age group of 50-70., and the most common organism isolated was E coli (73.3%), in rest of the patients Klebsiella (13.33%), Proteus (6.66%), and Staphylococcus (6.66%) were isolated. The overall bacteriological cure rate, in the present study, with cefotaxime/sulbactam and cefepime/tazobactam was 86.5%±6.5 and 93.3%±6.7 respectively. The clinical cure rate post five days of therapay, in goup A1 was 79.03%±2.82 and the same in group B1 was 87% ± 2.11. The clinical cure rate post ten days of therapy in group A2 98.57±0.03 and the same in group B2was 100%. Overall success rate as evaluated by our data in the present study in group A i.e those treated with cefotaxime/sulbactam was 89.28±9.1% and in group B i.e. those treated with cefepime/ tazobactam and 94.49±5.06%.

CONCLUSION

From the present study, those drugs in both generations of cephalosporins combined with beta lactamase inhibitors cefotaxime/sulbactam and cefepime/tazobactam were equally effective and well tolerated in the treatment of UTI. However the cost effectiveness and safety parameters are the important deciding factors for prescribing the same.

The safety of cefepime and ceftazidime in pediatric oncology patients

BACKGROUND

Concern has been raised about possible increased mortality associated with the use of cefepime. There are limited data available on the pragmatic use of beta-lactam antibiotics, especially in children.

PROCEDURE

This retrospective study included 532 pediatric oncology patients. The outcomes of patients treated with cefepime for suspected serious bacterial infections were compared to those of patients treated with ceftazidime. Primary outcomes included 30- and 90-day all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

The demographic and clinical characteristics of 337 patients treated with ceftazidime were similar to those of 195 patients receiving cefepime. Thirty-day and 90-day all cause mortality rates were comparable (30-day OR for cefepime: 3.48, 95% CI 0.31-38.84, P = 0.3; 90-day OR: 0.99, 95% CI 0.29-3.42, P = 1.0). There were also no differences in infection-related mortality rates, secondary infections, or adverse drug events. Deaths occurring within 30 days of hospitalization were judged to be attributable to infection, but not the result of treatment failure or adverse drug events. Deaths occurring between 30 and 90 days were associated with progressive or new malignancy. Secondary infection was significantly associated with mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of cefepime in pediatric oncology patients is not associated with increased mortality when compared to ceftazidime, however the small number of deaths in this study limits the strength of this conclusion. Previous associations between antimicrobial therapy and increased all-cause mortality may have been confounded by patients' demographic characteristics and co-morbid conditions. All-cause mortality may be an insensitive outcome for studies examining the efficacy and safety of these agents.

Cefepime

Cefepime (Maxipime), Maxcef, Cepimax, Cepimex, Axepim, a parenteral fourth-generation cephalosporin, is active against many organisms causative in pneumonia. Cefepime has in vitro activity against Gram-positive organisms including Staphylococcus aureus and penicillin-sensitive, -intermediate and -resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae similar to that of cefotaxime and ceftriaxone. Cefepime also has good activity against Gram-negative organisms, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, similar to that of ceftazidime. Importantly, cefepime is stable against many of the common plasmid- and chromosome-mediated beta-lactamases and is a poor inducer of AmpC beta-lactamases. As a result, it retains activity against Enterobacteriaceae that are resistant to third-generation cephalosporins, such as derepressed mutants of Enterobacter spp. Cefepime may be hydrolyzed by the extended-spectrum beta-lactamases produced by some members of the Enterobacteriaceae, but to a lesser extent than the third-generation cephalosporins. Monotherapy with cefepime 1 or 2g, usually administered intravenously twice daily, was as effective for clinical and bacteriological response as ceftazidime, ceftriaxone or cefotaxime monotherapy (1 or 2g two or three times daily) in a number of randomized, clinical trials in hospitalized adult, or less commonly, pediatric, patients with generally moderate to severe community-acquired or nosocomial pneumonia. More limited data indicated that monotherapy with cefepime 2g three times daily was also as effective in treating patients with nosocomial pneumonia as imipenem/cilostatin 0.5g four times daily, and when combined with amikacin, cefepime was as effective as ceftazidime plus amikacin. Patients with pneumonia who failed to respond to previous antibacterial therapy with penicillins or other cephalosporins responded to treatment with cefepime. Cefepime is generally well tolerated, with a tolerability profile similar to those of other parenteral cephalosporins. In clinical trials, the majority of adverse events experienced by cefepime recipients were mild to moderate and reversible. The most common adverse events with a causal relationship to cefepime reported in clinical trials included rash and diarrhea. Other, less common, adverse events included pruritus, urticaria, nausea, vomiting oral candidiasis, colitis, headache, fever, erythema and vaginitis.

CONCLUSION

Cefepime is an established and generally well tolerated parenteral drug with a broad spectrum of antibacterial activity which, when administered twice daily, provides coverage of most of the pathogens that may be causative in pneumonia. In randomized clinical trials in hospitalized patients with generally moderate to severe community-acquired or nosocomial pneumonia, cefepime monotherapy exhibited good clinical and bacteriological efficacy. Cefepime may become a preferred antibacterial agent for infections caused by Enterobacter spp. With prudent use in order to prevent the emergence of resistant organisms, cefepime will continue to be a suitable option for the empiric treatment of pneumonia.

Cefepime: a reappraisal in an era of increasing antimicrobial resistance

Cefepime is a 'fourth-generation' cephalosporin with an in vitro extended-spectrum of activity against Gram-negative and Gram-positive pathogens. Cefepime is approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe infections, such as pneumonia, uncomplicated and complicated urinary tract infections, skin and soft-tissue infections, intra-abdominal infections and febrile neutropenia. In this article, we provide a critical review of pharmacodynamics, clinical management, pharmacokinetics, metabolism, pharmacodynamic target analyses, clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of cefepime after more than a decade of clinical use.

Cefepime versus ceftazidime: considerations for empirical use in critically ill patients

Sepsis and nosocomial infections continue to be a significant problem in intensive care, contributing heavily to mortality and prolonged hospital stay. Early and appropriate antibiotic therapy is critical for optimising outcomes. However, the emergence of highly resistant bacteria, coupled with reduced development of novel antibiotics, means that there is a real threat of development of untreatable nosocomial infections. Cefepime and ceftazidime are broad-spectrum cephalosporins that are widely used to treat Gram-negative nosocomial infections in critically ill patients. Available data suggest that cefepime may have advantages over ceftazidime owing to a broader spectrum of activity and reduced potential for development of bacterial resistance. However, whether either of these agents is superior can only be determined by a head-to-head study evaluating clinical and bacteriological outcomes. Such a study to determine whether apparent differences translate into clinically relevant differences in outcome is indicated.

Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management of Urinary Tract Infection in Horses

Equine urinary tract infection (UTI) most commonly occurs as a sequela to structural or functional inhibition of normal urine flow. Although it is an infrequent diagnosis in equids, the incidence of UTI in human beings is high and has inspired great investigative effort. The resultant findings with potentially broad application as well as current equine studies are reviewed here. Recent developments in the understanding of host-agent interactions and renal defense mechanisms, emerging antimicrobial resistance, and novel therapeutic alternatives to prophylactic antibiotic use are emphasized.

Disposition kinetics, bioavailability and renal clearance of cefepime in calves

The pharmacokinetics of cefepime were studied following intravenous and intramuscular administration of 6.5 mg/kg in four female Friesian calves. Following single intravenous administration, the serum concentration-time curves of cefepime were best fitted using a two-compartment open model. The elimination half-life (t(1/2)beta) was 2.38+/-0.16 h, volume of distribution at steady state (Vdss) was 0.21 +/- 0.01 L/kg, and total body clearance (ClB) was 1.1 +/- 0.08 ml/min per kg. Following intramuscular administration, the drug was rapidly absorbed with an absorption half-life (t(1/2)ab) of 0.29+/-0.02 h; maximum serum concentration (Cmax) of 21.7 +/- 1.1 microg/ml was attained after (Tmax) 1.1 +/- 0.08 h; and the drug was eliminated with an elimination half-life (t(1/2)el) of 3.02 +/- 0.18 h. The systemic bioavailability (F) after intramuscular administration of cefepime in calves was 95.7% +/- 7.44%. The in vitro serum protein-binding tendency was 10.5-16.7%. Following administration by both routes, the drug was excreted in high concentrations in urine for 24 h post administration.

Steady-state plasma and intrapulmonary concentrations of cefepime administered in continuous infusion in critically ill patients with severe nosocomial pneumonia

OBJECTIVE

To determine the steady-state plasma and epithelial lining fluid concentrations of cefepime administered in continuous infusion in critically ill patients with severe bacterial pneumonia.

DESIGN

Prospective, open-label study.

SETTING

An intensive care unit and research ward in a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Twenty adult patients with severe nosocomial bacterial pneumonia on mechanical ventilation were enrolled.

INTERVENTIONS

All subjects received a 30-min intravenous infusion of cefepime 2 g followed by a continuous infusion of 4 g over 24 hrs. The concentrations of cefepime in plasma and epithelial lining fluid were determined at steady state after 48 hrs of therapy with high performance liquid chromatography.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The mean +/- sd steady-state plasma and epithelial lining fluid concentrations of cefepime 4 g in continuous infusion were 13.5 +/- 3.3 microg/mL and 14.1 +/- 2.8 microg/mL, respectively, with a mean percentage penetration of cefepime into epithelial lining fluid of about 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of 4 g of cefepime in continuous infusion in critically ill patients with severe nosocomial pneumonia appears to optimize the pharmacodynamic profile of this beta-lactam by constantly providing concentrations in excess of minimal inhibitory concentration of most of susceptible organisms over the course of therapy in both serum and epithelial lining fluid.

Cefepime use in a pediatric intensive care unit reduces colonization with resistant bacilli

BACKGROUND

Cefepime has activity against many hospital-acquired Gram-negative pathogens resistant to earlier beta-lactam antibiotics. This study was designed to test whether preferential use of cefepime in a pediatric intensive care unit could reduce enteric colonization with antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative rods.

METHODS

After a 6-month period of uncontrolled antibiotic use, cefepime was preferentially used during 2 years as treatment for nosocomial or serious community-acquired infection. Rectal swab specimens were obtained daily on every patient regardless of antibiotic exposure during the 6 months of uncontrolled antibiotic use and during the first and last 6 months of the 2 years of cefepime preference. The study outcome was rectal colonization with a facultative Gram-negative rod resistant to at least one of four antibiotics: cefepime; ceftazidime; gentamicin; or piperacillin-tazobactam.

RESULTS

The incidence of colonization by a resistant organism decreased only slightly during the first 6 months of cefepime use. By contrast, the number of antibiotic-resistant bacilli isolated from rectal swab specimens diminished from 27.6/100 patients during the baseline period to 12.9/100 patients by the last 6 months of the 2 years of cefepime preference (P < 0.01). The proportion of patients harboring at least one resistant organism decreased from 11.6% to 7.4% during the same time period (P < 0.01). A decrease in colonization with resistant organisms occurred for all the tested resistance phenotypes, including cefepime.

CONCLUSION

Cefepime may possess a low potential for promoting bacillary resistance in critically ill patients, suggesting that its preferential use might be a key element in limiting the presence of antibiotic resistance in the intensive care unit.

Pancreatic concentrations of cefepime in experimental necrotizing pancreatitis

To evaluate the penetration of cefepime in the inflamed pancreas, three doses of 50 mg/kg were administered intramuscularly at 8-h intervals after induction of acute necrotizing pancreatitis using intraperitoneal injection of DL-ethionine in 35 rabbits and in 33 controls. Animals were sacrificed and concentrations of cefepime were determined by a microbiological assay. Cefepime reached its peak concentrations 60 min after the last drug dose when mean values of 46.05 microg/ml, 22.34 microg/g and 34.74 microg/ml were found in serum, pancreas and bile, respectively, in rabbits with acute necrotizing pancreatitis and 45.19 microg/ml, 12.68 microg/g and 20.77 microg/ml respectively in controls. Tissue/serum ratios of cefepime were 0.48, 0.23, 0.15 and 0.09 at 60, 90, 120 and 180 min, respectively, after the last dose of cefepime in rabbits with acute necrotizing pancreatitis and 0.28, 0.18, 0.16 and 0.16, respectively at 60, 90, 120 and 180 min in controls. It is concluded that the administration of cefepime in rabbits with acute necrotizing pancreatitis resulted in pancreatic tissue levels well above the MIC90s of the common pathogens involved in pancreatic superinfection, so that its administration might be proposed for the therapy of superinfection following acute necrotizing pancreatitis in humans.

Mutational replacement of Leu-293 in the class C Enterobacter cloacae P99 beta-lactamase confers increased MIC of cefepime

The class C beta-lactamase from Enterobacter cloacae P99 confers resistance to a wide range of broad-spectrum beta-lactams but not to the newer cephalosporin cefepime. Using PCR mutagenesis of the E. cloacae P99 ampC gene, we obtained a Leu-293-Pro mutant of the P99 beta-lactamase conferring a higher MIC of cefepime (MIC, 8 microg/ml, compared with 0.5 microg/ml conferred by the wild-type enzyme). In addition, the mutant enzyme produced higher resistance to ceftazidime but not to the other beta-lactams tested. Mutants with 15 other replacements of Leu-293 were prepared by site-directed random mutagenesis. None of these mutant enzymes conferred MICs of cefepime higher than that conferred by Leu-293-Pro. We determined the kinetic parameters of the purified E. cloacae P99 beta-lactamase and the Leu-293-Pro mutant enzyme. The catalytic efficiencies (k(cat)/K(m)) of the Leu-293-Pro mutant beta-lactamase for cefepime and ceftazidime were increased relative to the respective catalytic efficiencies of the wild-type P99 beta-lactamase. These differences likely contribute to the higher MICs of cefepime and ceftazidime conferred by this mutant beta-lactamase.

Commonly used antibacterial and antifungal agents for hospitalised paediatric patients: implications for therapy with an emphasis on clinical pharmacokinetics

Due to normal growth and development, hospitalised paediatric patients with infection require unique consideration of immune function and drug disposition. Specifically, antibacterial and antifungal pharmacokinetics are influenced by volume of distribution, drug binding and elimination, which are a reflection of changing extracellular fluid volume, quantity and quality of plasma proteins, and renal and hepatic function. However, there is a paucity of data in paediatric patients addressing these issues and many empiric treatment practices are based on adult data. The penicillins and cephalosporins continue to be a mainstay of therapy because of their broad spectrum of activity, clinical efficacy and favourable tolerability profile. These antibacterials rapidly reach peak serum concentrations and readily diffuse into body tissues. Good penetration into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has made the third-generation cephalosporins the agents of choice for the treatment of bacterial meningitis. These drugs are excreted primarily by the kidney. The carbapenems are broad-spectrum beta-lactam antibacterials which can potentially replace combination regimens. Vancomycin is a glycopeptide antibacterial with gram-positive activity useful for the treatment of resistant infections, or for those patients allergic to penicillins and cephalosporins. Volume of distribution is affected by age, gender, and bodyweight. It diffuses well across serous membranes and inflamed meninges. Vancomycin is excreted by the kidneys and is not removed by dialysis. The aminoglycosides continue to serve a useful role in the treatment of gram-negative, enterococcal and mycobacterial infections. Their volume of distribution approximates extracellular space. These drugs are also excreted renally and are removed by haemodialysis. Passage across the blood-brain barrier is poor, even in the face of meningeal inflammation. Low pH found in abscess conditions impairs function. Toxicity needs to be considered. Macrolide antibacterials are frequently used in the treatment of respiratory infections. Parenteral erythromycin can cause phlebitis, which limits its use. Parenteral azithromycin is better tolerated but paediatric pharmacokinetic data are lacking. Clindamycin is frequently used when anaerobic infections are suspected. Good oral absorption makes it a good choice for step-down therapy in intra-abdominal and skeletal infections. The use of quinolones in paediatrics has been restricted and most information available is in cystic fibrosis patients. High oral bioavailability is also important for step-down therapy. Amphotericin B has been the cornerstone of antifungal treatment in hospitalised patients. Its metabolism is poorly understood. The half-life increases with time and can be as long as 15 days after prolonged therapy. Oral absorption is poor. The azole antifungals are being used increasingly. Fluconazole is well tolerated, with high bioavailability and good penetration into the CSF. Itraconazole has greater activity against aspergillus, blastomycosis, histoplasmosis and sporotrichosis, although it's pharmacological and toxicity profiles are not as favourable.

Comparison of cefepime pharmacokinetics in neonatal foals and adult dogs

The pharmacokinetics of cefepime, a new fourth generation cephalosporin with enhanced antibacterial activity, was examined in neonatal foals and adult dogs. Cefepime was administered intravenously (i.v.) at a dose of 14 mg/kg to five neonatal foals and six adult dogs. Blood samples were collected in both groups of animals and plasma cefepime concentrations measured by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Cefepime concentrations in both groups of animals were described by a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model with elimination half-lives of 1.65 and 1.09 h for the foal and dog, respectively. We tested whether or not pharmacokinetic parameters for cefepime could be scaled across species using principles of allometry. The parameters of elimination half-life (t(1/2)beta), apparent volume of distribution (VDarea), and systemic clearance (CL) were scaled linearly to body weight on a double logarithmic plot with allometric exponents for body weight of 0.26, 1.08 and 0.72, respectively. This study further determined doses for cefepime, a potentially useful antibiotic for neonatal foals and dogs, from the pharmacokinetic values. An i.v. dose of cefepime estimated from this study for treating sensitive bacteria was 11 mg/kg every 8 h for neonatal foals and 40 mg/kg every 6 h for dogs.

High-performance liquid chromatographic determination of cefepime in human plasma and in urine and dialysis fluid using a column-switching technique

A high-performance liquid chromatographic method with UV absorbance was developed for the analysis of cefepime in human plasma and urine, and in dialysis fluid. Detection was performed at 280 nm. The assay procedure for cefepime in plasma involves the addition of an internal standard (cefpirome) followed by treatment of the samples with trichloracetic acid, acetonitrile and dichloromethane. To quantify cefepime in diluted urine (1:20) and in the dialysis fluid, samples spiked with the internal standard (cefpirome) were analysed using a column-switching technique. The HPLC column, Nucleosil C18, was equilibrated with an eluent mixture composed of acetonitrile-ammonium acetate (pH 4). Linear detector responses were observed for the calibration curve standards in the range 0.5 to 100 microg/ml, which spans what is currently thought to be the clinically relevant range for cefepime concentrations in body fluids. The limit of quantification was 0.5 microg/ml in the three matrices. Extraction recoveries proved to be more than 84%. Precision, expressed as %RSD, was in the range 1.5 to 9%. Accuracy ranged from 93 to 105%. This method was used to follow the time course of the concentration of cefepime in plasma, urine and dialysate outlet samples after a 10-min infusion period of 2 g of this drug in patients with acute renal failure undergoing hemodiafiltration.

Cefepime microbiologic profile and update

BACKGROUND

The evolution of the cephalosporin class of antibiotics through modifications of the basic cephem structure has resulted in a new generation with improved antibacterial activity. Cefepime is a prototypic agent of this new class of fourth generation cephalosporins.

OBJECTIVE

To review the microbiologic profile of cefepime.

RESULTS

Cefepime, which is a zwitterion, has a net neutral charge that allows it to penetrate the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria faster than third generation cephalosporins. It is more stable against beta-lactamases because of the lower affinity of the enzymes for cefepime when compared with third generation cephalosporins. As a result of these structural attributes, cefepime has in vitro activity against pathogens that are prevalent in pediatric infections. This agent offers the advantage of Gram-positive coverage similar to that of cefotaxime and ceftriaxone, as well as good activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and many enteric bacilli that are resistant to third generation cephalosporins, including clinical isolates of Enterobacter spp. and Citrobacter freundii.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on its spectrum of activity cefepime is an option for the treatment of pediatric infections caused by susceptible pathogens.

Antibiotic side effects

Antibiotic side effects are approached best from an individual agent perspective rather than from a class-related standpoint. As this article indicates, with the exception of drug fevers and drug rashes, most antibiotic side effects are related to individual agents and not class side effects. Clinicians should view antimicrobial side effects as related to each organ system and be aware that more often a nonmicrobial medication is the explanation for the drug side effect rather than the antimicrobial. Nonantimicrobial medications are the most common cause of drug fever; among antimicrobials, beta-lactams and sulfonamides are the most common causes of drug-induced fevers. Antimicrobial side effects have important implications for the patient, legal and economic implications for the hospital, and medicolegal implications for the physician. Antibiotic side effects that prolong hospitalization in today's managed care environment have important economic implications. Clinicians should be familiar with the most common side effects of the most frequently used antimicrobials, to minimize the potential of having adverse reactions occur in patients. Most adverse events related to antimicrobials are reversible rapidly on cessation of the medication. Irreversible toxicities include aminoglycoside-induced ototoxicity, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and toxicity secondary to nitrofurantoin. The most common acute fatal drug reactions include hypersensitivity reactions resulting in anaphylaxis or the Stevens-Johnson syndrome and fatal hepatic necrosis secondary to trovafloxacin. Clinicians should eliminate the use of drugs associated with chronic or fatal toxicities because multiple therapeutic alternatives exist for virtually every potential infection.

Nosocomial pneumonia. Diagnostic and therapeutic considerations

Many patients with presumed nosocomial pneumonia probably have infiltrates on the chest radiograph, fever, and leukocytosis resulting from noninfectious causes. Because of the high mortality and morbidity associated with nosocomial pneumonias, however, most clinicians treat such patients with a 2-week empiric trial of antibiotics. Before therapy is initiated, the clinician should rule out other causes of pulmonary infiltrates, fever, and leukocytosis that mimic a nosocomial pneumonia (e.g., pre-existing interstitial lung disease, primary or metastatic lung carcinomas, pulmonary emboli, pulmonary drug reactions, pulmonary hemorrhage, collagen vascular disease affecting the lungs, or congestive heart failure). If these disorders can be eliminated from diagnostic consideration, a 2-week trial of empiric monotherapy is indicated. The clinician should treat cases of presumed nosocomial pneumonia as if P. aeruginosa were the pathogen. Although P. aeruginosa is not the most common cause of nosocomial pneumonia, it is the most virulent pulmonary pathogen associated with nosocomial pneumonia. Coverage directed against P. aeruginosa is effective against all other aerobic gram-negative bacillary pathogens causing hospital-acquired pneumonia. The clinician should select an antibiotic for empiric monotherapy that is highly effective against P. aeruginosa, has a good side-effect profile, has a low resistance potential, and is relatively inexpensive in terms of its cost to the institution. The preferred agents for empiric monotherapy for nosocomial pneumonia are cefepime, meropenem, and piperacillin. Single organisms are responsible for nosocomial pneumonia, not multiple pathogens. S. aureus rarely, if ever, causes nosocomial pneumonia but is mentioned frequently in studies based on cultures of respiratory tract secretions. S. aureus, unless accompanied by a necrotizing pneumonia with rapid cavitation within 72 hours, in the sputum indicates colonization rather than infection and should not be addressed therapeutically. Antibiotics associated with a high resistance potential should not be used as monotherapy or included in combination therapy regimens (i.e., ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, imipenem, or gentamicin). Combination therapy is more expensive than monotherapy and is indicated only when P. aeruginosa is extremely likely, based on its characteristic clinical presentation, or is proved by tissue biopsy. Therapy should not be based on respiratory secretion cultures regardless of technique. Optimal combination regimens include cefepime or meropenem plus levofloxacin or piperacillin or aztreonam or amikacin. Nosocomial pneumonias usually are treated for 14 days. Lack of radiographic or clinical response to appropriate empiric nosocomial pneumonia monotherapy after 14 days suggests an alternate diagnosis. In these patients, a tissue biopsy specimen should be obtained to determine the cause of the persistence of pulmonary infiltrates unresponsive to appropriate antimicrobial therapy.

Cephalosporins, carbapenems, and monobactams

Nonpenicillin beta-lactams exhibit a variable spectrum of antimicrobial activity, have a wide range of clinical uses and a favorable safety profile. Cefepime's twice-daily dosage and increased activity against Enterobacteriaceae may offer some advantages over older cephalosporins. The carbapenems offer a broad antimicrobial spectrum, and meropenem has an improved safety profile compared with imipenem. Aztreonam is a useful alternative for patients with aerobic gram-negative infections who are allergic to penicillin. The emergence of resistant organisms, however, is an increasing problem with the frequent use of these antibiotics.

The cephalosporins

The cephalosporins are a large group of related beta-lactam antimicrobial agents. Favorable attributes of the cephalosporins include low rates of toxicity, relatively broad spectrum of activity, and ease of administration. Various cephalosporins are effective for treatment of many conditions, including pneumonia, skin and soft tissue infections, bacteremia, and meningitis. Differences among the numerous cephalosporin antimicrobial agents are sometimes subtle; however, an understanding of these differences is essential for optimal use of these agents. As a result of widespread use of cephalosporins, bacterial resistance to these drugs is increasingly common. New, fourth-generation agents (such as cefepime) offer an alternative for the treatment of infections caused by some drug-resistant microorganisms.

Multicenter evaluation of the in vitro activity of six broad-spectrum beta-lactam antimicrobial agents in Puerto Rico. The Puerto Rico Antimicrobial Resistance Study Group

The minimum inhibitory concentrations of 6 broad-spectrum beta-lactam antimicrobial agents were determined by use of the Etest versus a total of 569 bacteria in 7 Puerto Rican hospital laboratories. These included 342 recent clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae, 63 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 54 Acinetobacter species, and 110 oxacillin-susceptible staphylococci. Extended spectrum beta-lactamase production was noted among 11% of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates. Hyperproduction of Amp C cephalosporinase was observed with > 20% of isolates of Enterobacter spp., Serratia spp., and Citrobacter freundii. The overall rank order of activity of the six beta-lactams examined in this study versus all clinical isolates was imipenem (95.8% susceptible) > cefepime (91.1%) > piperacillin/ tazobactam (82.3%) > cefotaxime (77.6%) > piperacillin (72.5%) > ceftazidime (67.0%).

Severe community-acquired pneumonia

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is likely to be severe in the very elderly, and clinically significant in those with hepatic/ renal insufficiency, cardiopulmonary disease, or, impaired host defenses. Pathogens in mild, moderately severe, and severe CAP are the same. These pathogens determine prognosis, complications, and duration of therapy. Empiric antimicrobial therapy should be based on likely pathogens, not severity of illness which affects the potency but not spectrum of antibiotic selected.

Pharmacokinetics of cefepime during continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration

The objective of this study was to analyze the pharmacokinetics of cefepime, in six patients with acute renal failure related to septic shock, during continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHD) (Hemospal AN 69S hemofilter; Hospal, Lyon, France). Six patients, mean age 65 +/- 4 years (range, 61 to 69), were included and each received 2 g of cefepime by intravenous infusion over a 30-min period every 12 h. Prefilter serum, dialysate outlet (DO), and ultrafiltrate samples were collected 0.47, 0.50, 0.57, 1, 3, 5, 7, and 12 h after the beginning of infusion. The time design of samples was optimized in accordance with the theory of D optimality. The cefepime concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. The pharmacokinetics computation was carried out using P-PHARM software. Mean serum concentration peaks were 53 +/- 21.9 mg/liter (range, 13.0 to 68.9) one-half hour after the infusion. The mean elimination half-life was 8.11 +/- 2.22 h (range, 4.76 to 10.84). DO clearance was 66.57 +/- 30.14 ml/min (range, 38.66 to 119.87). The mean volume of distribution was 0.71 +/- 0.37 liters/kg of body weight. CVVHD was effective for cefepime elimination. In these subjects, the elimination half-life and DO clearance were almost constant. The results of this study suggested that a 2-g twice-daily infusion (usual dosage) was required for an effective concentration in this group of patients.

Antimicrobial agents for the dermatologist. I. Beta-lactam antibiotics and related compounds

We review the newer antimicrobial agents that are being employed by dermatologists with increased frequency as well as some of the more commonly used older agents. Particular emphasis is based on selection factors such as causative pathogens and their resistance profiles, routes of administration, toxicity, drug interactions, and dosing requirements. Emphasis in this review is on the newer classes of antimicrobials such as third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins; beta-lactam, beta-lactamase inhibitor combination agents; monobactams; carbapenems; macrolides; and fluoroquinolones. Dermatologic indications and treatment alternatives are highlighted; this will expand the practicing clinician's therapeutic armamentarium and enable him/her to make rational decisions concerning treatment approaches to infectious disease problems encountered in daily practice.

Pharmacokinetics of intravenously and intramuscularly administered cefepime in infants and children

The pharmacokinetic characteristics of cefepime were determined after first dose (n = 35) and again under steady-state conditions (n = 31) with a group of 37 infants and children. In eight subjects, a cefepime dose given by intramuscular injection was substituted for an intravenous dose, and disposition characteristics were studied again. Study subjects ranged in age from 2.1 months to 16.4 years, and all had normal renal function. Each patient received 50 mg of cefepime/kg of body weight intravenously every 8 h, up to a total maximum individual dose of 2 g. With the exception of one study patient who received a single cefepime dose for surgical prophylaxis, the patients received cefepime for 2 to 13 days. Elimination half-life (t1/2), steady-state volume of distribution, total body clearance, and renal clearance after first dose administration averaged 1.7 h, 0.35 liter/kg, and 3.1 and 1.9 ml/min/kg, respectively. Although cefepime t1/2 and mean residence time (MRT) were slightly longer for subjects <6 months of age than for older subjects, no differences in cefepime disposition characteristics between first dose and steady-state evaluations were observed. t1/2 (1.8 versus 1.9 h) and MRT (2.3 versus 3.2 h) were slightly prolonged after intramuscular administration, reflecting the influence of absorption from the intramuscular injection site on cefepime elimination. Bioavailability after intramuscular administration averaged 82% (range, 61 to 124%). Fifty-seven percent of the first dose and 88.9% of the last dose were recovered as unchanged drug in urine over the 8- and 24-h sampling periods, respectively. These pharmacokinetic data support a single cefepime dosing strategy for patients > or =2 months of age. The integration of the cefepime pharmacokinetic data generated in our study with the MICs for important pathogens responsible for infections in infants and children supports the administration of a dose of 50 mg of cefepime/kg every 12 h for patients > or =2 months of age to treat infections caused by pathogens for which cefepime MICs are < or =8 mg/liter.

Treatment of urinary tract infections: selecting an appropriate broad-spectrum antibiotic for nosocomial infections

Clinical and in vitro data indicate that cefepime, a fourth-generation cephalosporin, may be a valuable addition in the treatment of serious infections. In this study, hospitalized patients with complicated and uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI), for which parenteral therapy was appropriate, were enrolled in a 2:1 ratio open, randomized trial comparing the efficacy and safety of cefepime and ceftazidime. A total of 180 patients, including 6 with concurrent bacteremia, were evaluated for their response to cefepime (n = 118) or ceftazidime (n = 62), both of which were administered by intravenous infusion or intramuscular injection in doses of 500 mg every 12 hours. In cases of complicated UTI, cefepime produced a satisfactory clinical response in 83 of 93 (89%) patients and eradicated 83 of 98 (85%) pathogens. A satisfactory clinical response to ceftazidime was experienced by 43 of 50 (86%) patients; and in 39 of 50 (78%) cases pathogens were eradicated. In uncomplicated cases, the clinical response and bacterial eradication rates for cefepime were 23 of 25 (92%) and 22 of 26 (85%), respectively, and for ceftazidime 12 of 12 (100%) and 11 of 12 (92%). Of the 6 patients with concomitant bacteremia, 5 received cefepime and 1, ceftazidime. The infecting organisms, Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis, were eradicated in all cases, although one cefepime-treated patient had an unsatisfactory clinical response. The most common adverse events in both groups were headache, diarrhea, and vomiting; most events were unrelated to therapy. Adverse events forced only a 2% withdrawal of patients in either group. There was local tolerance to both agents, and abnormalities in laboratory values were judged to be clinically insignificant. The results of this study indicate that cefepime can be used safely and successfully to treat both complicated and uncomplicated nosocomial infection of the urinary tract, including cases associated with concurrent bacteremia. Moreover, its safety profile appears comparable to those of other cephalosporins, and local tolerance is similar to that of ceftazidime. No patient in either group required discontinuation of therapy because of local intolerance at the infusion or injection site.

A new therapeutic option for the treatment of pneumonia

Patients with bacterial pneumonia often are treated empirically with parenteral broad-spectrum antimicrobials intended to cover potential gram-negative and gram-positive pathogens. However, beta-lactamase-mediated resistance has developed to many of these antimicrobials, particularly third-generation cephalosporins, and has led to the development of fourth-generation agents that are relatively beta-lactamase stable. The purpose of these studies was to compare the efficacy and safety of the fourth-generation agent, cefepime, with that of the third-generation agent, ceftazidime, in the treatment of hospitalized patients with moderate-to-severe bacterial pneumonia. A total of 336 (97 evaluable) patients were enrolled in an open-label study, and 99 (23 evaluable) patients were enrolled in a blinded study of patients with lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) including pneumonia. Patients were randomized to receive either cefepime 1 g every 12 hours or ceftazidime 1 g every 8 hours given as an intravenous infusion over 30 minutes. Efficacy analysis included the evaluable patients while the safety analysis included all patients. The results in the open-label study were as follows: In patients with pneumonia, clinical response was satisfactory in 58 (85%) of 68 patients in the cefepime group and 21 (72%) of 29 patients in the ceftazidime group. Bacteriologic eradication occurred for 75 (93%) of 81 pathogens and 30 (94%) of 32 pathogens isolated from the 68 cefepime-treated patients and 29 ceftazidime-treated patients, respectively. The results in the blinded study were as follows: In patients with pneumonia, clinical response was satisfactory in 12 (80%) of 15 cefepime patients and in 7 (88%) of 8 ceftazidime patients, and the bacteriologic eradication rates were 85% (17/20 pathogens) and 73% (8/11 pathogens) isolated from the 15 cefepime-treated patients and the eight ceftazidime-treated patients, respectively. Among the most frequent adverse events in both groups were nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. Similar adverse events were noted in the 99 patients in the blinded study. These studies indicate that the efficacy and safety of cefepime administered at 1 g twice daily is comparable to that of ceftazidime administered at 1 g three times daily for treatment of hospitalized patients with pneumonia caused by susceptible pathogens.

Susceptibility of bacterial isolates to beta-lactam antibiotics from U.S. clinical trials over a 5-year period

Results are reported for agar dilution susceptibility testing of 3,075 isolates of aerobic bacteria collected from >200 U.S. institutions, located in 30 different states. These isolates were collected from 1987 through 1991 from patients who participated in cefepime clinical trials. Cefepime susceptibility was compared with ceftazidime, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, cefoperazone, and imipenem. To avoid duplication of strains, only initial isolates were included. Cefepime minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC90) values for Enterobacteriaceae were < or = 0.5 microg/mL, except for two species, Citrobacter freundii and Providencia stuartii, with MIC90 values of 2 and 1, respectively. The MIC90 values of the other cephalosporins were higher, especially for Enterobacter aerogenes and C. freundii. The MIC90 values of cefepime for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (4 microg/mL) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (8 microg/mL) were similar to those of cefotaxime for S. aureus (4 microg/mL), and to ceftazidime for P. aeruginosa (8 microg/mL). Streptococcus pneumoniae was similar in susceptibility to cefotaxime at 0.06 microg/mL. The activity of cefepime against a diverse group of gram-positive and gram-negative (1987-1991) bacteria isolates demonstrates the excellent activity of cefepime compared to third-generation cephalosporins and imipenem, particularly among C. freundii and E. aerogenes isolates, which were often resistant to other cephalosporins.