[Stool antigen test for initial Helicobacter pylori diagnosis and for confirmation of eradication after therapy]

Non-invasive diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) infection has been implicated in a number of malignancies and non-malignant conditions including peptic ulcers, non-ulcer dyspepsia, recurrent peptic ulcer bleeding, unexplained iron deficiency anaemia, idiopathic thrombocytopaenia purpura, and colorectal adenomas. The confirmatory diagnosis of H pylori is by endoscopic biopsy, followed by histopathological examination using haemotoxylin and eosin (H & E) stain or special stains such as Giemsa stain and Warthin-Starry stain. Special stains are more accurate than H & E stain. There is significant uncertainty about the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests for diagnosis of H pylori.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of urea breath test, serology, and stool antigen test, used alone or in combination, for diagnosis of H pylori infection in symptomatic and asymptomatic people, so that eradication therapy for H pylori can be started.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Science Citation Index and the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Database on 4 March 2016. We screened references in the included studies to identify additional studies. We also conducted citation searches of relevant studies, most recently on 4 December 2016. We did not restrict studies by language or publication status, or whether data were collected prospectively or retrospectively.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included diagnostic accuracy studies that evaluated at least one of the index tests (urea breath test using isotopes such as 13C or 14C, serology and stool antigen test) against the reference standard (histopathological examination using H & E stain, special stains or immunohistochemical stain) in people suspected of having H pylori infection.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened the references to identify relevant studies and independently extracted data. We assessed the methodological quality of studies using the QUADAS-2 tool. We performed meta-analysis by using the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) model to estimate and compare SROC curves. Where appropriate, we used bivariate or univariate logistic regression models to estimate summary sensitivities and specificities.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 101 studies involving 11,003 participants, of which 5839 participants (53.1%) had H pylori infection. The prevalence of H pylori infection in the studies ranged from 15.2% to 94.7%, with a median prevalence of 53.7% (interquartile range 42.0% to 66.5%). Most of the studies (57%) included participants with dyspepsia and 53 studies excluded participants who recently had proton pump inhibitors or antibiotics.There was at least an unclear risk of bias or unclear applicability concern for each study.Of the 101 studies, 15 compared the accuracy of two index tests and two studies compared the accuracy of three index tests. Thirty-four studies (4242 participants) evaluated serology; 29 studies (2988 participants) evaluated stool antigen test; 34 studies (3139 participants) evaluated urea breath test-13C; 21 studies (1810 participants) evaluated urea breath test-14C; and two studies (127 participants) evaluated urea breath test but did not report the isotope used. The thresholds used to define test positivity and the staining techniques used for histopathological examination (reference standard) varied between studies. Due to sparse data for each threshold reported, it was not possible to identify the best threshold for each test.Using data from 99 studies in an indirect test comparison, there was statistical evidence of a difference in diagnostic accuracy between urea breath test-13C, urea breath test-14C, serology and stool antigen test (P = 0.024). The diagnostic odds ratios for urea breath test-13C, urea breath test-14C, serology, and stool antigen test were 153 (95% confidence interval (CI) 73.7 to 316), 105 (95% CI 74.0 to 150), 47.4 (95% CI 25.5 to 88.1) and 45.1 (95% CI 24.2 to 84.1). The sensitivity (95% CI) estimated at a fixed specificity of 0.90 (median from studies across the four tests), was 0.94 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.97) for urea breath test-13C, 0.92 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.94) for urea breath test-14C, 0.84 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.91) for serology, and 0.83 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.90) for stool antigen test. This implies that on average, given a specificity of 0.90 and prevalence of 53.7% (median specificity and prevalence in the studies), out of 1000 people tested for H pylori infection, there will be 46 false positives (people without H pylori infection who will be diagnosed as having H pylori infection). In this hypothetical cohort, urea breath test-13C, urea breath test-14C, serology, and stool antigen test will give 30 (95% CI 15 to 58), 42 (95% CI 30 to 58), 86 (95% CI 50 to 140), and 89 (95% CI 52 to 146) false negatives respectively (people with H pylori infection for whom the diagnosis of H pylori will be missed).Direct comparisons were based on few head-to-head studies. The ratios of diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) were 0.68 (95% CI 0.12 to 3.70; P = 0.56) for urea breath test-13C versus serology (seven studies), and 0.88 (95% CI 0.14 to 5.56; P = 0.84) for urea breath test-13C versus stool antigen test (seven studies). The 95% CIs of these estimates overlap with those of the ratios of DORs from the indirect comparison. Data were limited or unavailable for meta-analysis of other direct comparisons.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In people without a history of gastrectomy and those who have not recently had antibiotics or proton ,pump inhibitors, urea breath tests had high diagnostic accuracy while serology and stool antigen tests were less accurate for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection.This is based on an indirect test comparison (with potential for bias due to confounding), as evidence from direct comparisons was limited or unavailable. The thresholds used for these tests were highly variable and we were unable to identify specific thresholds that might be useful in clinical practice.We need further comparative studies of high methodological quality to obtain more reliable evidence of relative accuracy between the tests. Such studies should be conducted prospectively in a representative spectrum of participants and clearly reported to ensure low risk of bias. Most importantly, studies should prespecify and clearly report thresholds used, and should avoid inappropriate exclusions.

Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori: Changes towards the Future

Since the first evidence demonstrating the dramatically high incidence of H. pylori infection and the subsequent medical challenges it incurs, health management of H. pylori infection has been a high priority for health authorities worldwide. Despite a decreasing rate of infection in western countries, prevalence of H. pylori infection in developing and in some industrial countries is still very high. Whereas treatment and vaccination against H. pylori is a contemporary issue in medical communities, selective treatment and prior high-throughput screening of the subject population is a major concern of health organizations. So far, diagnostic tests are either elaborative and require relatively advanced medical care infrastructure or they do not fulfill the criteria recommended by the Maastricht IV/Florence consensus report. In this review, in light of recent scientific studies, we highlight current and possible future approaches for the diagnosis of H. pylori. We point out that novel non-invasive tests may not only cover the requirements of gold standard methods in H. pylori detection but also offer the potential for risk stratification of infection in a high throughput manner.

Evaluation of 3 different tests for the detection of stool antigens to confirm Helicobacter pylori eradication after treatment. A pilot study

INTRODUCTION

Recently, several new diagnostic methods aimed to detect Helicobacter pylori stool antigens have been developed. Our aim was to evaluate the accuracy of 3 different stool tests to confirm H. pylori eradication.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-six patients received H. pylori eradication treatment. Eradication was confirmed with 13C-urea breath test 6-8 weeks later, when stool samples were analyzed by polyclonal (Premier-Platinum-HpSATM), monoclonal (Amplified-IDEIATM-HpStARTM), and rapid test (ImmunoCard-STAT-HpSATM).

RESULTS

H. pylori was eradicated in 85% of the cases. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value with the polyclonal test were: 25%, 91%, 33% and 87%. Corresponding results with the monoclonal test, using the cut-off point recommended by the manufacturer, were 100%, 46%, 25% and 100%. However, the best cut-off point in our study had 100% sensitivity and 91% specificity. The area under ROC curve for the polyclonal and the monoclonal tests was 0.65 and 0.95. Diagnostic accuracy with the rapid test was 75%, 90%, 60% and 95%.

CONCLUSION

Neither the polyclonal stool antigen test nor the rapid stool antigen test can be recommended to confirm H. pylori eradication after treatment. The monoclonal test has better diagnostic accuracy, although more studies are necessary to definitively recommend its use for the confirmation of H. pylori eradication success.

[Helicobacter pylori infection in the child population in Spain: prevalence, related factors and influence on growth]

INTRODUCTION

A causal relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection and the occurrence of digestive diseases in adults and children has been proven. Worldwide, the prevalence of H. pylori varies and it is possibly influenced by differences in the level of development. The goals of this study were a) to ascertain the prevalence of H. pylori infection in the child population in Spain, b) to study several factors related to this infection, and c) to establish its possible influence on growth.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a descriptive, cross-sectional survey of a representative sample of children aged 1 to 14 years old. The sample consisted of 284 children (prevalence 5 15 %; accuracy 5 4 %; CI > 95 %), selected at random and stratified by age and sex. A pre-coded questionnaire was used for data collection. Diagnosis of H. pylori was established by detection of H. pylori antigen in stools with enzyme immunoassay.

RESULTS

The sample consisted of 144 boys and 140 girls, with a mean age of 6.89 6 4.25 years. The prevalence of H. pylori infection was 15.8 % and progressively increased with age: 1- to 3-year-olds (8.4 %), 4- to 9-year-olds (13.9 %), 10- to 14-year-olds (24 %) (p < 0.05). The prevalence was significantly higher in boys (p < 0.01). Analysis of socio-environmental variables showed a higher H. pylori infection rate in children from families with a low socioeconomic level (p < 0.01), a high rate of overcrowding (p < 0.05), and in immigrants (p < 0.001). The H. pylori infection rate was higher in children with recurrent abdominal pain (p < 0.001) and in those whose parents had suffered from gastroduodenal disease (p < 0.001). H. pylori infection was more frequent in children aged 10 to 14 years old with weight and height percentiles below the 25th percentile (p < 0.05). Comparison of means revealed no significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of H. pylori infection found in our study was slightly lower than that found in other studies carried out in Spain; our data were more similar to those of industrialized countries. H. pylori infection was linked to age, sex and deprived socioeconomic environments, and was more frequent in children with recurrent abdominal pain and in those whose parents suffered from gastroduodenal disease. H. pylori infection did not seem to negatively affect growth in our child population.

Stool antigen test for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection: a systematic review

Our aim was to review systematically the diagnostic accuracy of the Helicobacter pylori stool antigen test. Bibliographical searches were performed in several electronic databases and abstracts from congresses up to May 2003. Eighty-nine studies (10,858 patients) evaluated the stool antigen test in untreated patients. Mean sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 91%, 93%, 92% and 87%, respectively. Analysis of the eight studies (1399 patients) in which pretreatment evaluation of the monoclonal stool antigen test was performed showed better (p < .001) results (96%, 97%, 96% and 97%, respectively), with a clearer distinction between positive and negative results. Thirty-nine studies (3147 patients) evaluated the stool antigen test for the confirmation of H. pylori eradication 4-8 weeks after therapy, with accuracies of 86%, 92%, 76% and 93% for mean sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value, respectively. Results were similar when a gold standard based on at least two methods was used. Relatively low accuracy was reported in some posttreatment studies with the polyclonal stool antigen test. However, excellent results (p < .001) were achieved in all the six studies evaluating the monoclonal stool antigen test 4-8 weeks posttreatment. Results evaluating the stool antigen test < 4 weeks posttreatment are contradictory. Proton-pump inhibitors seem to affect the accuracy of the stool antigen test. Sensitivity and/or specificity in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding may be suboptimal. The stool antigen test performs well in children. Finally, the stool antigen test seems to be a cost-effective method.

Evaluation of three different tests for the detection of stool antigens to diagnose Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding

AIM

To evaluate the accuracy of several methods aimed to detect Helicobacter pylori stool antigens in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

METHODS

Thirty-four patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding because of peptic ulcer were included. The first stool sample during hospitalization was collected, and stool antigens were determined with: polyclonal enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Premier-Platinum-HpSA); monoclonal enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Amplified-IDEIA-HpStAR); and rapid monoclonal immunochromatographic test (ImmunoCard-STAT HpSA). A patient was considered infected when H. pylori was diagnosed with invasive tests (rapid urease test or histology) or with (13)C-urea breath test. When all tests were negative, a new breath test was repeated after stopping proton pump inhibitors.

RESULTS

All patients were infected and, therefore, only sensitivity of the tests could be calculated: polyclonal enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (74%), monoclonal enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (94%), and rapid monoclonal immunochromatographic test (60%; concordance between the two observers was high, kappa = 0.9). Neither the presence of maelena nor the delay in obtaining stool samples explained false negatives.

CONCLUSIONS

Neither the polyclonal enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay stool antigen test nor the rapid immunochromatographic stool antigen test can be recommended to diagnose H. pylori infection in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. However, the monoclonal enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay stool antigen test is highly sensitive for detecting the infection in patients with this complication, although more studies are necessary to evaluate the specificity of the method.

Review article: diagnosis and treatment of Helicobacter: a 2002 updated review

The year 2002 saw advances on many fronts in the study of Helicobacter and gastroduodenal disease. Several studies have confirmed endoscopy as a valuable management procedure with confirmation of the diagnostic utility of the rapid urease test and the description of a new formulation of the test, which is more rapid in giving a result. Serology has been re-confirmed as a useful investigation in selected populations. Some commercial kits for near patient testing have also been assessed and although generally regarded as less accurate than laboratory based tests some have shown acceptable accuracy. The recent exciting development in diagnostic serology is the availability of the faecal antigen test; further studies have confirmed its usefulness as recommended screening tests. There have been several studies demonstrating that a test and treat policy has a significant patient benefit, both economic and medical, although there is some doubt if eradication of Helicobacter leads to regression of atrophy and metaplasia. However, in low Helicobacter-prevalence areas the test and treat policy is being challenged as an effective management strategy. Further studies have shown that compliance with treatment regimens is an important determinant of successful eradication. Finally several new eradication regimens have been reported particularly for use in patients who have had previous unsuccessful eradication attempts.

The management of rosacea

Rosacea is a multiphasic disease which is associated with flushing, erythrosis, papulopustular rosacea and phymas; each phase is likely to have its own treatment. Flushing is better prevented rather than treated, and its etiology investigated. Beta-blockers, atenolol in particular, are worthy of prophylactic trials examining their efficacy in treating the flushing associated with rosacea. Currently, clonidine is the only drug available for the treatment of flushing. Treatment for erythrosis includes topical and systemic therapies. Metronidazole 1% cream and azelaic acid 20% cream have been reported to reduce the severity score of erythema. The systemic treatment of erythrosis is based on the association of Helicobacter pylori with rosacea. However, this role is still being debated. Eradication of H. pylori can be achieved using a triple therapy regimen lasting 1 to 2 weeks [omeprazole and a combination of two antibacterials (a choice from clarithromycin, metronidazole or amoxicillin)]. Both the flashlamp-pumped long-pulse dye laser and the potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser may be used in the treatment of facial telangiectases. Both systemic and topical remedies may be used to treat the papulopustules of rosacea. Systemic treatment includes metronidazole, doxycycline, minocycline, clarithromycin and isotretinoin, while topical treatment is based on metronidazole cream and gel. The presence of Demodex folliculorum is important in the inflammatory reaction, whether it is pathogenetic or not. Crotamiton 10% cream or permethrin 5% cream may be useful medications for papulopustular rosacea, although they are rarely successful in eradicating D. folliculorum. Oral or topical ivermectin may also be useful in such cases. Ocular involvement is common in patients with cutaneous rosacea and can be treated with orally administered or topical antibacterials. Once rhinophyma starts to be evident, the only way to correct it is by aggressive dermatosurgical procedures. Decortication and various types of lasers can also be used. Associated conditions, such as seborrheic dermatitis and possible contact sensitizations, deserve attention.