[Blood pressure differences between consecutive days of ambulatory monitoring in hypertensive patients: the ABPM effect]

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: is the daytime period enough for making clinical decisions?

AIM

To assess the agreement between the clinical information provided by the ambulatory daytime average and 24 h average blood pressure value for diagnosing hypertension and assessing the effects of antihypertensive treatment.

METHODS

We analysed 261 24 h ambulatory monitoring records (SpaceLabs 90207, SpaceLabs, Redmond, Washington, USA) obtained from hypertensives over 18 years of age (mean age 55.8 years) in order to make a diagnosis of hypertension or assess its control in response to treatment. Recording was programmed to occur every 20 min during waking periods and every 30 min during sleep, daily activity also being registered. The criteria compared in the diagnosis of hypertension were: (1) the evaluation criterion: an average blood pressure for the activity period of less than 135/85 mmHg (Joint National Committee VI); (2) the gold standard: an average blood pressure over 24 h of less than 125/80 mmHg (World Health Organization-International Society of Hypertension, 1999).

RESULTS

In 90% of the records, there was agreement between both criteria. In 7.2%, the awake blood pressure average was normal and the 24 h average high. Values obtained were: sensitivity, 89% (95% confidence interval 84-89%); specificity, 92% (95% CI 88-95%); positive predictive value, 95.6% (95% CI 93-98%); negative predictive value, 81% (95% CI 75-85%); pretest probability, 66% (95% CI 60-72%); positive likelihood ratio, 11; and negative likelihood ratio, 0.3. There were no significant differences in age, gender or percentage of treated subjects between the groups with and without agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

Daytime and 24 h average blood pressure may indeed carry similar information for diagnosing hypertension and assessing the effects of antihypertensive treatment in clinical practice. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring used only during the daytime period could be better tolerated and agreed to by patients than 24 h monitoring.

Influence of two doses of irbesartan on non-dipper circadian blood pressure rhythm in salt-sensitive black hypertensives under high salt diet

The authors examined whether the blockage of angiotensin II receptors by irbesartan (IRB) can reverse the "non-dipper" circadian rhythm of blood pressure (BP) to a "dipper" pattern in black salt-sensitive hypertensive patients submitted to a high-sodium loading. Twelve black salt-sensitive hypertensive patients (seven men; age, 35-58 years) on a high-sodium diet (300 mmol Na+ per day) were followed for 8 weeks. A placebo was given during the first 2 weeks, followed by 2 weeks on IRB 150 mg/d, 2 weeks on placebo, and 2 weeks on IRB 300 mg/d. On the last day of placebo, IRB 150 mg/d, and IRB 300 mg/d treatments, 24-hour BP and urinary 24-hour excretion of Na+ and potassium were measured. On placebo, ambulatory mean arterial pressure (MAP) was 112 mm Hg+/-2 (24 h), 112 mm Hg+/-2 (daytime), and 111 mm Hg+/-2 (nighttime), showing a clear circadian non-dipper profile. Versus placebo, IRB 150 mg/d reduced MAP by 4.2 mm Hg+/-1.1 (24 h), 2.6 mm Hg+/-0.8 (daytime) and 6.0 mm Hg+/-1.3 (nighttime; P<0.05 vs. placebo) and IRB 300 mg/d reduced MAP by 7.8 mm Hg+/-1.4 (24 h), 3.9 mm Hg+/-1.1 (daytime), and 11.8 mm Hg+/-2.1 mm Hg (all P<0.02 vs. placebo); nighttime/daytime MAP decrease was 0.7+/-0.8% on placebo, 3.5+/-2.1% on IRB 150 mg/d, and 7.0+/-1.2% on IRB 300 mg/d (P<0.02 for trend). Compared with placebo, IRB significantly increased serum potassium and plasma renin activity and reduced fractional excretion of potassium and plasma aldosterone levels in a dose-dependent manner. Body weight and urinary sodium excretion did not change throughout the study. It was concluded that the angiotensin receptor blocker IRB can reverse the BP non-dipper profile in salt-sensitive hypertensive patients on a high-salt diet, restoring nocturnal BP decline by a predominantly dose-dependent reduction of nighttime BP. Although the increment of potassium balance and reduction of aldosterone may account for this effect, it occurs independently of increased natriuresis. It is speculated that blunting of nighttime BP decrease in black salt-sensitive hypertensive patients may be related to a deficient suppression of the renin-angiotensin system during the night.

[Seasonal variation in plasma fibrinogen in dipper and non-dipper patients with mild-moderate essential hypertension]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Increased plasma fibrinogen is recognized as a significant parameter for assessing the potential risk of myocardial infarction and stroke. A seasonal variation has been reported for plasma fibrinogen, with highest values occurring in the coldest months of the year. On the other hand, the lack of nocturnal decline in blood pressure has been associated with an increase in cardiovascular events. Accordingly, we have quantified the yearly variation in plasma fibrinogen in hypertensive patients classified according to their nocturnal decline in blood pressure.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

We studied 577 mild-to-moderate hypertensive patients (254 men), 53.8 13.8 years of age. Blood pressure was measured every 20 min during the day and every 30 min at night for 48 consecutive hours. Physical activity was simultaneously evaluated at 1-min intervals with a wrist actigraph. A complete blood test was performed on the same day before starting blood pressure monitoring. The circannual variation of plasma fibrinogen was established for all patients as well as for subgroups of dippers (n = 287) and non-dippers (n = 290; patients with a nocturnal blood pressure decline < 10% of the diurnal mean) by multiple-component analysis.

RESULTS

For the whole group of hypertensive patients, plasma fibrinogen was characterized by a highly significant seasonal variation (p < 0.001), with a mean value of 324 mg/dl, double circannual amplitude (i.e, extent of predictable change along the year) of 75 mg/dl, and time of peak value on the first week of March. This circannual variation can be best represented by a model that includes components with periods of 12 and 6 months. The same model also characterized dippers as well as non-dippers, analyzed separately. Non-dippers showed higher plasma fibrinogen throughout the whole year as compared to dippers (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The elevation of plasma fibrinogen in non-dipper patients as compared to dippers could support the association between the lack of nocturnal decline in blood pressure with an increase in cardiovascular events, since the circannual variation in fibrinogen is timely correlated with the reported yearly variation in coronary events.

Administration time-dependent effects of aspirin on blood pressure in untreated hypertensive patients

Previous studies on the potential influence of aspirin on blood pressure have not taken into consideration the chronopharmacological effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. This pilot study investigates the effects of aspirin on blood pressure in untreated hypertensive patients who received aspirin at different times of the day according to their rest-activity cycle. We studied 100 untreated patients with mild hypertension (34 men and 66 women), 42.5+/-11.6 (mean+/-SD) years of age, randomly divided into 3 groups: nonpharmacological hygienic-dietary recommendations; the same recommendations and aspirin (100 mg/d) on awakening; or the same recommendations and aspirin before bedtime. Blood pressure was measured every 20 minutes during the day and every 30 minutes at night for 48 consecutive hours before and after 3 months of intervention. The circadian pattern of blood pressure in each group was established by population multiple-component analysis. After 3 months of nonpharmacological intervention, there was a small, nonsignificant reduction of blood pressure (<1.1 mm Hg; P>0.341). There was no change in blood pressure when aspirin was given on awakening (P=0.229). A highly significant blood pressure reduction was, however, observed in the patients who received aspirin before bedtime (decrease of 6 and 4 mm Hg in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively; P<0.001). Results indicate a statistically significant administration time-dependent effect of low-dose aspirin on blood pressure in untreated patients with mild hypertension. The influence of aspirin on blood pressure demonstrated in this study indicates the need to quantify and control for aspirin effects in patients using this drug in combination with antihypertensive medication.

[Circadian blood pressure variation in normal pregnancy, gestational hypertension, and preeclampsia]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Changes in circadian variation of blood pressure could be used either to predict preeclampsia or to assess its severity. With the objective of identifying potential differences in blood pressure at the early stages of pregnancy, we examined and compared the characteristics of circadian variability in blood pressure in healthy and complicated pregnant women who were systematically monitored throughout gestation.

SUBJECTS AND METHOD

We analyzed 2,014 blood pressure series sampled through ambulatory monitoring for 48 hours once every 4 weeks from the first obstetric visit until delivery. The study included 205 women with uncomplicated pregnancy, 92 with gestational hypertension and 31 with preeclampsia. The circadian pattern of blood pressure variation for each group and trimester of gestation was established by means of a population multiple-components analysis.

RESULTS

Differences in the 24-hour mean between healthy and complicated pregnancies were highly significant in all trimesters (p < 0.001), with values of 15.1 and 9.1 mmHg for systolic and diastolic blood presure, respectively, in the third trimester of pregnancy. The 24-hour mean of systolic/diastolic blood pressure for complicated pregnancies was always below 120/72 mmHg. Results further indicated similar circadian characteristics between gestational hypertension and preeclampsia in the first trimester of pregnancy. The difference between these two groups in the 24-hour mean was significant in the second trimester for systolic (3 mmHg; p = 0.002) but not diastolic blood pressure (0.9 mmHg; p = 0.230). In the third trimester, the difference between gestational hypertension and preeclampsia was significant for both variables (5.4 and 3.7 mmHg for systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The differences in blood pressure between healthy and complicated pregnancies, which are observed as early as the first trimester of pregnancy, are detected when both systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements in women with a late diagnosis of gestational hypertension or preeclampsia fall within accepted ranges of normotension. These differences offer new end points that may lead to an early identification of hypertensive complications in pregnancy as well as to the establishment of prophylactic interventions.

The tolerance-hyperbaric test: a chronobiologic approach for improved diagnosis of hypertension

Blood pressure (BP) displays predictable large-amplitude circadian variability. Thus, the identification and the proper definition of hypertension are highly ambiguous when based on single time-unspecified measurements. One way to deal with such variability in the diagnosis of hypertension is to replace the commonly used constant limits of BP by a time-specified reference interval based on the normal circadian BP rhythm assessed by ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). A proper reference limit can be constructed, for instance, as a tolerance interval computed for every specific time interval throughout the 24 h. Once such a threshold (given by the upper limit of the tolerance interval) is constructed, a hyperbaric index (HBI) can be computed by numerical integration of the total area of any given patient's BP profile above threshold. The HBI plus the duration of excess within the 24h day serves as nonparametric endpoints for assessing hypertension. Both retrospective and prospective evaluation of this tolerance-hyperbaric test validate its high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of hypertension. We describe the theory of the HBI as well as a newly created dedicated software program that automatically derives the tolerance intervals from a reference database of normotensive subjects and calculates the HBI and other potentially valuable parameters based on data obtained by ABPM. The establishment of time-qualified tolerance limits and the assessment of the extent and timing of BP elevation represents a valuable tool for the more accurate diagnosis of hypertension as well as means of gauging response to treatment.