[Clinical intervention in smoking. Are specific primary health-care centers needed?]

Características biopsicosociales relacionadas con el consumo de cigarrillo y la intención de cesación en fumadores en un entorno universitario

Introducción. El tratamiento de la dependencia tabáquica requiere la comprensión de múltiples factores que determinan los patrones de consumo y la posibilidad de lograr un cambio conductual. Objetivo. Establecer las características biopsicosociales asociadas con el consumo de cigarrillo y la intención de cesación de los usuarios de un programa interdisciplinario para dejar de fumar en un entorno universitario.Materiales y métodos. Estudio descriptivo transversal. Se revisaron las historias clínicas de 134 usuarios del programa que completaron la fase de evaluación.Resultados. 56.7% de los participantes presentó un grado leve de tabaquismo; además, 67.2% tuvo una baja dependencia a la nicotina. Se encontró una tamización positiva para ansiedad y depresión en el 62.7% y 34.3% de la muestra, respectivamente. La mayoría de sujetos tenía por lo menos un amigo fumador (91%) (n=122) y había realizado al menos un intento previo de cesación (85.1%) (n=114); los individuos con riesgo de desarrollar ansiedad presentaron un mayor consumo diario de cigarrillos (Kruskal-Wallis p=0.041) que aquellos que no estaban en riesgo.Conclusiones. Diferentes aspectos personales, familiares y contextuales determinan la posibilidad de iniciar, continuar y/o recaer en el consumo de cigarrillos, por lo que la implementación de intervenciones efectivas exige la comprensión integral de los factores implicados en su consumo y en la intención de cesación.

[Effectiveness of a programme of intensive tobacco counselling by nursing professionals]

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of a systematic intensive tobacco counselling programme conducted by nursing professionals.

DESIGN

Randomised clinical trial with control.

SETTING

Primary care nursing and medical consultations.

PARTICIPANTS

Smokers requesting help in our centre's medical clinics during the recruitment period, up to the sample size required (125). Inclusion criteria were: aged between 18 and 70, people who smoked during the preceding month any number of cigarettes a day, and a score over 7 on the Richmond test.

INTERVENTIONS

The patients recruited were randomised, according to the clinic from which they came, to the group that received brief counselling from the doctor (control group) or to the group that received brief counselling plus nursing follow-up (intervention group). Follow-up visits were programmed in this latter group for up to 3 months after giving up smoking.

MAIN MEASUREMENTS

Abstinence at 12 and 24 months.

RESULTS

The effectiveness of the intervention considered as the rate of abstinence at 12 months was 13.8% (95% CI, 6.5-24.7) in the control group and 6.7% (95% CI, 1.8-16.2) in the intervention group, with no significant differences between the two.

CONCLUSIONS

In smokers seen in primary care, the effectiveness of a programme of intensive tobacco counselling by nursing staff is no more effective than the doctor's brief, one-off counselling. Brief counselling has a better cost-effectiveness relationship than intensive counselling.

Manejo de las recaídas en la deshabituación tabáquica

Due to the recurrent chronic nature of tobacco dependence, health care professionals should know the most common reasons for relapses and offer smokers who have stopped smoking a preventive treatment. In our setting, some authors state that the main causes for which smokers relapse are the negative emotional states and social pressures. Among the prevention strategies of relapse are providing the patient information, reinforcing his/her decision to stop smoking and helping the patient identify and face the danger situations for the maintenance of abstinence.

[Effectiveness of advanced group and individual interventions in tackling tobacco dependency in primary care]

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness of group advanced intervention and individual advanced intervention for smoking management in primary health care; b) to know if in group intervention exists an added positive effect due of the group and, if this is true, to characterize it; and c) to know the advantages and inconvenients that the participants attribute to each intervention.

DESIGN

Control clinic trial randomized in individual scale.

SETTING

Mallorca primary health centers, Spain.

PARTICIPANTS

Smokers >5 packet-year or monoxid carbon levels >15 ppm prepared for give up smoking. People younger than 18 years, people with terminal illness, and mental problems will be excluded.

INTERVENTIONS

Candidates will be assigned to: a) group intervention; b) individual intervention; or c) short intervention or control group. Interventions will be done by a nurse and a general practitioner. Depth interview will be done for qualitative study. PRINCIPAL MEASUREMENT: Maintained cessation during 12 months confirmed by expired-air carbon monoxide measurement. SECONDARY MEASUREMENTS: Self-declared cessation and confirmed by expired-air carbon monoxide measurement months 1, 2, 3, 6, and 9, and tobacco reduction if there isn't abandonment.

ANALYSIS

Intention treatment. Multilevel analysis will be done to determinate the positive effect added of the group if it's proved that exists. Content analysis for qualitative study.

DISCUSSION

Randomization will prevent participants will be treated by their general practitioner o their nurse, this can mean worse results than results obtained in practice.