Valores séricos de factor de crecimiento del endotelio vascular en pacientes con cáncer colorrectal y su significación pronóstica

Circulating vascular endothelial growth factor and cancer risk: A bidirectional mendelian randomization

In observational studies, circulating vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has been reported to be associated with certain types of cancer. The purpose of this study was to verify whether there is a causal relationship between circulating VEGF and different types of cancer and the direction of the causal relationship. Summary statistical data were obtained from the corresponding genome-wide association studies (GWASs) to investigate the causal relationship between circulating VEGF and the risk of several cancers, including breast cancer, ovarian cancer, lung cancer, colorectal cancer, anus and anal canal cancer, prostate cancer, esophageal cancer, kidney cancer, bladder cancer, thyroid cancer, malignant neoplasm of the brain and malignant neoplasm of the liver and intrahepatic bile ducts. A two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis and sensitivity tests were used to evaluate the validity of causality. A causal relationship was detected between circulating VEGF and colorectal cancer (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.11–1.32, p < 0.000) and colon adenocarcinoma (OR 1.245, 95% CI 1.10–1.412, p < 0.000). Suggestive evidence of association was detected in VEGF on malignant neoplasms of the rectum (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.00–1.34, p = 0.049). No causal relationship was found between circulating VEGF and other types of cancer, nor was there a reverse causal relationship from tumors to VEGF (p > 0.05). Circulating VEGF has a causal relationship with specific types of cancer. Our findings highlight and confirm the importance of circulating VEGF in the prevention and treatment of colorectal cancer.

Comparison of angiogenic factor levels in tumor drainage and peripheral venous blood from colorectal cancer patients

BACKGROUND

The main objective of this study was to determine whether there was a correlation in the levels of various angiogenesis-related factors between the tumor drainage and peripheral venous blood and whether appraisal of angiogenic factor levels in the tumor drainage venous blood could provide better prognostic information for patients with colorectal cancer than assessment of the peripheral venous blood.

METHODS

Plasma levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic fibroblast growth factor, and endostatin were measured and compared in both tumor drainage and peripheral venous blood from 52 patients with colorectal cancer. Plasma levels of angiogenesis-related factors were also correlated with tumor stage and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

The plasma endostatin level was significantly higher in peripheral blood than in tumor drainage venous blood (P < .001). The plasma VEGF level was significantly correlated with plasma endostatin levels (P = .028 in tumor drainage venous blood and P = .002 in peripheral venous blood). In both tumor drainage and peripheral venous blood, the VEGF level (but not the basic fibroblast growth factor or endostatin level) was significantly correlated with tumor stage and disease recurrence. However, in multivariate analysis, only plasma VEGF level in tumor drainage venous blood remained an independent predictor of disease recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

The plasma VEGF level in tumor drainage venous blood provided better prognostic information than that in peripheral venous blood. The plasma endostatin level was paradoxically significantly higher in peripheral than in tumor drainage blood, and this strongly suggests additional sources of endostatin in peripheral blood.