Anévrismes intracrâniens non rompus : que proposer ?

Risk factors for angiographic recurrence after treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: Outcomes from a series of 178 unruptured aneurysms treated by regular coiling or surgery

BACKGROUND

Long-term stability after intracranial aneurysm exclusion by coiling is still a matter of debate; after surgical clipping little is known.

OBJECTIVE

To study outcome after endovascular and surgical treatments for unruptured intracranial aneurysms in terms of short- and long-term angiographic exclusion and risk factors for recanalization.

METHODS

From 2004 and 2009, patients treated for unruptured berry intracranial aneurysms by coiling or clipping were reviewed. Aneurysmal exclusion was evaluated using the Roy-Raymond grading scale; immediate clinical outcome was also assessed. Clinical outcome, recanalization, risk factors for recurrence and bleeding during the follow-up period were analyzed by groups; "surgery" and "embolization".

RESULTS

From 2004 to 2009, 178 consecutive unruptured aneurysms were treated. The post-procedure angiographic results for "surgery" were: total exclusion 75.6%; residual neck 13.5%; residual aneurysm 10.8%. For "embolization", the results were, respectively: 72%; 20.7%; and 7.2%. Morbidity was 3% for "surgery" and 1.6% for "embolization" (P=0.74); mortality was nil. Mean clinical and angiographic follow-up was 5years. Recurrence rate was of 11.5% for "surgery" vs. 44% for "embolization" with a mean follow-up of 4 and 5.75years, respectively (P=1.10-5). The retreatment rate was 8.4%. Two significant risk factors for recanalization were identified: maximum diameter of the aneurysm sac (P=0.0038) and pericallosal location (P=0.0388). No bleeding event occurred.

CONCLUSION

Both techniques are safe. The rate of aneurismal recurrence was significantly higher for embolization, especially for large diameter aneurysms and pericallosal locations. No bleeding event occurred after recanalization.

[Treatment of grade 0 intracranial aneurysms: Retrospective study of 79 cases]

AIM

Without precise international recommendations, despite the advances of the ISUAA study, the superiority of microsurgery or endovascular treatment for unruptured intracranial aneurysm (UIA) over the natural history of this disease has not been proved. In this context, the authors evaluate their experience with the aim of assessing the results and risks of the different therapeutics and comparing them with the natural risk of this disease.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

From January 1993 to July 2000, 79 patients harboring 110 UIAs were treated. These patients were divided retrospectively into two groups. Group A included 45 operated patients. Group B included 37 patients treated with endovascular coiling. The therapeutic choice was not randomized and was approved by a multidisciplinary neurovascular staff.

RESULTS

The two populations were homogeneous in terms of age and sex. In group A, 12 patients presented early complications (26.6 %), with one death. In group B, 15.6 % of the patients presented an ischemic complication. After 1 year of follow-up, morbidity was 11.4 % in group A and 4.8 % for group B. Angiography found a partial recanalization in 12.5 % of the operated patients and in 33 % of the patients treated with endovascular coiling.

DISCUSSION

Many factors are involved in the therapeutic decision: UIA location and size and individual risks. Progress in both surgery and interventional neuroradiology has led to good results conforming with the data reported in the literature but does not demonstrate the superiority of one technique over another.

Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms. A Critical Review of the International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms (ISUIA) and of Appropriate Methods to Address the Clinical Problem

SUMMARY

The preventive treatment of unruptured aneurysms has been performed for decades despite the lack of evidence of a clinical benefit. Reports of observational studies such as the International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms (ISUIA) suggest that preventive treatments are rarely justified. Are these reports compelling enough to guide clinical practice? The ISUIA methods and data are reviewed and analysed in a more conventional manner. The design of the appropriate clinical research program is approached by steps, reviewing potential problems, from the formulation of the precise research question to the interpretation of subgroup analyses, including sample size, representativity, duration of observation period, blinding, definition of outcome events, analysis of cross-overs, losses to follow-up, and data reporting. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms observed in ISUIA ruptured at a minimal annual rate of 0.8% (0.5-1%), despite multiple methodological difficulties biased in favour of a benign natural history. Available registries do not have the power or the design capable of providing normative guidelines for clinical decisions. The appropriate method to solve the clinical dilemma is a multicentric trial comparing the incidence of a hard clinical outcome events in approximately 2000 patients randomly allocated to a treatment group and a deferred treatment group, all followed for ten years or more. Observational studies have failed to provide reliable evidence in favour or against the preventive treatment of unruptured aneurysms. A randomized trial is in order to clarify what is the role of prevention in this common clinical problem.

Feasibility, procedural morbidity and mortality, and long-term follow-up of endovascular treatment of 321 unruptured aneurysms

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the technical feasibility, morbidity and mortality, and durability of occlusion of unruptured aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils (GDCs) with a long-term follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 1998 and January 2005, we treated 321 unruptured aneurysms with GDCs in 5 neuroradiologic institutions. During this period, 63% of unruptured aneurysms were treated by endovascular technique. Procedural feasibility, technical complications, morbidity and mortality, and acute and long-term angiographic occlusion were assessed.

RESULTS

Overall technical feasibility of coiling treatment was 94%; 302 aneurysms were treated by endovascular technique. At the end of the initial procedure, acute occlusion was classified as complete in 207 cases (70%), subtotal in 84 cases (26.1%), and incomplete in 11 cases (3.9%). Ischemic complications were observed in 28 patients (9%); 8 patients (2.6%) had perforation of their aneurysms. Treatment-related morbidity was 14.4%, and morbidity with clinical complications was evaluated at 7.7% (n = 23 patients). Five patients (1.7%) died as a result of aneurysm perforation. Final follow-up angiograms, after 9 secondary treatments, demonstrated complete occlusion in 193 patients (69.5%), subtotal in 80 aneurysms (28.5%), and incomplete occlusion in 5 (1.8%). Nineteen patients were lost to follow-up (6.3%).

CONCLUSION

Endovascular coiling with detachable coils is an attractive option for treatment of unruptured aneurysms. This method of treatment is safe with a low rate of complications. Prospective studies with longer follow-up periods are needed to assess the long-term durability of occlusion in unruptured aneurysms.

Traitement de l'hémorragie méningée anévrismale

The incidence of subarachnoid hemorrhages is about 10.5/100,000 persons/year. Early obliteration of the aneurysmal sac is necessary to avoid rebleeding. The neurovascular staff meeting must decide the appropriate obliteration procedure for each patient. Intraoperative morbidity is 8% after endovascular coiling and 10% after microsurgical clipping. Endovascular coiling leads to complete obliteration of the aneurysm in 60% of patients and microsurgical clipping in 95%. Delayed ischemic deficits may be prevented by volemic expansion and calcium channel blockers. Hospitalization and general prophylaxis against deep venous thrombosis, pain and seizures are essential. Curative treatment is required against common complications such as intraparenchymatous hematoma, hydrocephalus, and delayed ischemic deficit.