Anterior lumbar interbody fusion for the management of chronic lower back pain: current strategies and concepts

Interbody options in lumbar fusion

Interbody devices have revolutionized lumbar fusion surgery by enhancing mechanical stability, optimizing sagittal parameters, and maximizing fusion potential. There are several lumbar interbody fusion approaches available for varying pathologic etiologies, surgical index levels, or due to surgeon preference. With the advancement of spinal instrumentation and interbody devices, a variety of cage materials and dimensions have been engineered to accommodate various lumbar fusion approaches. The efficacy of a fusion is dependent on the shape, size, and material makeup of that interbody device. Since there are numerous cages available in today's market, it is important to find the optimal cage to best accommodate specific lumbar fusion cases. This review will explain the properties and future advancements of various interbody devices available for lumbar fusions.

Safety of a novel modular cage for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion - clinical cohort study in 20 patients with degenerative disc disease

Introduction: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is used to reconstruct disc height and reduce degenerative deformity in spinal fusion. Patients with osteoporosis are at high risk of TLIF cage subsidence; possibly due to the relatively small footprint compared to anterior interbody devices. Recently, modular TLIF cage with an integral rail and slot system was developed to reduce cage subsidence and allow early rehabilitation.

Objective: To study the safety of a modular TLIF device in patients with degenerative disc disorders (DDD) with regard to surgical complications, non-union, and subsidence.

Methods: Patients with DDD treated with a modular TLIF cage (Polyetheretherketone (PEEK), VTI interfuse S) were analysed retrospectively with one-year follow-up. Lumbar sagittal parameters were collected preoperatively, postoperatively and at one year follow-up. Cage subsidence, fusion rate, screw loosening and proportion of endplate coverage were assessed in computed tomography scan.

Results: 20 patients (age 66 ± 10 years, 65% female, BMI 28 ± 5 kg/m²) with a total of 37 fusion levels were included. 15 patients had degenerative spondylosis and 5 patients had degenerative scoliosis. The cages covered >60% of the vertebral body diameters. Lumbar lordosis angle and segmental disc angle increased from 45.2 ± 14.5 and 7.3 ± 3.6 to 52.7 ± 9.1 and 10.5 ± 3.5 (p =  0.029 and 0.0002) postoperatively for each parameter respectively without loss of correction at one year follow up. One case of deep postoperative infection occurred (5%). No cage subsidence occurred. No non-union or screw loosening occurred.

Conclusions: The modular TLIF cage was safe with regard to subsidence and union-rate. It restored and maintained lumbar lordosis angle, segmental disc angle and disc height, which can be attributed to the large footprint of this modular cage.

Comparing the early efficacies of autologous bone grafting and interbody fusion cages for treating degenerative lumbar instability in patients of different ages

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the early efficacies of interbody fusion using autologous bone graft or an interbody fusion cage in a modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in patients of different ages with degenerative lumbar instability.

METHODS

Data from 33 patients with double-segment degenerative lumbar instability treated with a modified TLIF combined with a posterior fixation system from December 2008 to June 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. The two segments separately received an interbody bone graft fusion and an interbody fusion cage. Patients were divided by age into group A (middle-aged and elderly group, age ≥ 55 years, n = 13) and group B (young adult group, age < 55 years, n = 20). The clinical efficacy of the modified TLIF combined with a posterior fixation system was assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores obtained before and after surgery, and at final follow-up. We measured the mean intervertebral space height, intervertebral foramen height, lumbar lordosis angle, and inter-technique differences in the mean intervertebral space height and intervertebral foramen height. Interbody fusion was evaluated using the Suk standard.

RESULTS

Patients in group A followed-up for 19.15 ± 8.01 months. Patients in group B followed-up for 14.80 ± 5.47 months. The post-operative JOA, ODI, VAS, and lumbar lordosis angle were improved significantly. Moreover, the early clinical follow-up effect was good. In group A, significant differences in the intervertebral foramen height post-surgery and at final follow-up, and the mean intervertebral space height at final follow-up were noted. The intervertebral foramen and space heights were increased in the interbody cage group. In group B, a significant difference in the intervertebral foramen height at final follow-up was noted. The mean intervertebral space height post-surgery and at final follow-up was significantly increased between the two fusion methods. Bony fusion was achieved in all cases. The fusion time of autologous bone graft and interbody fusion cage was 5.46 ± 1.20 months and 6.77 ± 1.01 months respectively in group A, and 5.50 ± 1.28 months and 6.35 ± 1.76 months respectively in group B, the difference in fusion time between techniques was significant.

CONCLUSION

At different ages, the interbody fusion cages can better preserve the intervertebral space and the intervertebral foramen height. However, autologous bone graft can rapidly achieve a bony fusion. Interbody fusion cages are therefore ideal for young adults, while autologous bone grafting is ideal for middle-aged and elderly patients who receive a modified TLIF.

Outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery based on indication: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

There is limited information on clinical outcomes after anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) based on the indications for surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of ALIF for each surgical indication.

METHODS

This prospective clinical study included 125 patients who underwent ALIF over a 2-year period. The patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively. Outcome measures included the Short Form-12, Oswestry Disability Index, Visual Analog Scale, and Patient Satisfaction Index.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up of 20 months, the clinical condition of the patients was significantly better than their preoperative status across all indications. A total of 108 patients had a Patient Satisfaction Index score of 1 or 2, indicating a successful clinical outcome in 86%. Patients with degenerative disk disease (with and without radiculopathy), spondylolisthesis, and scoliosis had the best clinical response to ALIF, with statistically significant improvement in the Short Form-12, Oswestry Disability Index, and Visual Analog Scale. Failed posterior fusion and adjacent segment disease showed statistically significant improvement in all of these clinical outcome scores, although the mean changes in the Short Form-12 Mental Component Summary, Oswestry Disability Index, and Visual Analog Scale (back pain) were lower. The overall radiological fusion rate was 94.4%. Superior radiological outcomes (fusion >90%) were observed in patients with degenerative disk disease (with and without radiculopathy), spondylolisthesis, and failed posterior fusion, whereas in adjacent segment disease, it was 80%.

CONCLUSION

ALIF is an effective treatment for degenerative disk disease (with and without radiculopathy) and spondylolisthesis. Although results were promising for scoliosis, failed posterior fusion, and adjacent segment disease, further studies are necessary to establish the effectiveness of ALIF in these conditions.

Primary stiffness of a modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage with integrated screw fixation: cadaveric biomechanical study

STUDY DESIGN

In vitro biomechanical study using human fresh-frozen vertebrae.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the influence of the additional screw fixation on the stability of a noncommercially available prototype transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) cage, when used as a stand-alone fusion device and in combination with pedicle screws (PSs).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Generally interbody fusion cages are supplemented by additional fixation devices such as PS. However, such posterior instrumented techniques are associated with additional soft-tissue trauma and potentially increased complication rate. To limit such drawbacks, a conventional posterior TLIF cage was modified to allow supplemental screw fixation to the adjacent vertebral bodies, to increase initial stiffness and possibly allow as a stand-alone posterior interbody cage.

METHODS

Six monosegmental lumbar spine segments were loaded in a spine simulator with pure bending moments of 7.5 Nm in lateral bending, flexion/extension, and axial rotation. The following paradigms were tested: intact spines; a destabilized spine (i.e., after discectomy and unilateral facetectomy); and the modified TLIF cage with (i.e., fixed TLIF cage) and without (i.e., TLIF cage) integrated screw fixation as a stand-alone model and with and without additional posterior fixation with bilateral PS. The range of motion (RoM) was recorded by a 3-dimensional motion analysis system.

RESULTS

The TLIF cage with integrated screw fixation had minimal additional stabilizing effect in all motion planes with or without supplemental PS fixation. Moreover, compared with the intact spines, the stand-alone TLIF cage with and without integrated screw fixation did not reduce the RoM in any of the 3 motion planes. Comparison of the TLIF cage with integrated screw fixation to the TLIF cage supplemented with PS showed a significantly greater RoM in all testing conditions (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In several testing paradigms, the prototype TLIF cage with the integrated screw fixation had limited effect in reducing RoM and providing stability. The PS was the main contributor in reducing RoM in the destabilized spine and remains the current "gold standard" in posterolateral spinal fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A.

Outcomes and complications of the midline anterior approach 3 years after lumbar spine surgery

Objective. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a new questionnaire to assess outcomes related to the midline anterior lumbar approach and to identify risk factors for negative patient responses. Methods. A retrospective review of 58 patients who underwent anterior lumbar surgery at a single institution for either degenerative disc disease or spondylolisthesis in 2009 was performed. The outcome measures included our newly developed Anterior Lumbar Surgery Questionnaire (ALSQ), ODI, and EQ-5D. Results. There were 58 patients available for followup, 27 women and 31 men. The average age at surgery was 50.8 years, with an average followup of 2.92 years. The average change in ODI was 34.94 (22.7) and EQ-5D was 0.28 (0.29). The rate of complications with the anterior approach was 10.3% and there was one male patient (3.2%) with retrograde ejaculation. Determination of the effectiveness of the new ALSQ revealed that it significantly correlated to the EQ-5D and ODI (P < 0.05). Smoking was associated with a negative response on thirteen questions. BMP use was not associated with a negative response on any sexual function questions. Conclusions. Our new Anterior Lumbar Surgery Questionnaire determines patient perceived complications related to the midline anterior lumbar surgical approach.

Indications for anterior lumbar interbody fusion

Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) has become a widely recognized surgical technique for degenerative pathology of the lumbar spine. Spinal fusion has evolved dramatically ever since the first successful internal fixation by Hadra in 1891 who used a posterior approach to wire adjacent cervical vertebrae in the treatment of fracture-dislocation. Advancements were made to reduce morbidity including bone grafting substitutes, metallic hardware instrumentation and improved surgical technique. The controversy regarding which surgical approach is best for treating various pathologies of the lumbar spine still exists. Despite being an established treatment modality, current indications of ALIF are yet to be clearly defined in the literature. This article discusses the current literature on indications on ALIF surgery.

A systematic review of comparative studies on bone graft alternatives for common spine fusion procedures

BACKGROUND

The increased prevalence of spinal fusion surgery has created an industry focus on bone graft alternatives. While autologous bone graft remains the gold standard, the complications and morbidity from harvesting autologous bone drives the search for reliable and safe bone graft substitutes. With the recent information about the adverse events related to bone morhogenetic protein use, it is appropriate to review the literature about the numerous products that are not solely bone morphogenetic protein.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this literature review is to determine the recommendations for use of non-bone morphogenetic protein bone graft alternatives in the most common spine procedures based on a quantifiable grading system.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic literature review.

METHODS

A literature search of MEDLINE (1946-2012), CINAHL (1937-2012), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (1940-April 2012) was performed, and this was supplemented by a hand search. The studies were then evaluated based on the Guyatt criteria for quality of the research to determine the strength of the recommendation.

RESULTS

In this review, more than one hundred various studies on the ability of bone graft substitutes to create solid fusions and good patient outcomes are detailed.

CONCLUSION

The recommendations for use of bone graft substitutes and bone graft extenders are based on the strength of the studies and given a grade.

Two-year follow-up results after treatment of lumbar instability with titanium-coated fusion system

OBJECTIVE

  The purpose of this prospective clinical trial, with a minimum two-year follow-up, was to evaluate the clinical effects of a titanium-coated lumbar interbody fusion system in the treatment of lumbar instability.

METHODS

  The study cohort consisted of 94 patients with lumbar instability who accepted posterior lumbar interbody fusion with a titanium-coated fusion system. The patients were examined at the sixth, 12th and 24th month postoperatively. The clinical outcomes of all patients were evaluated according to the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and Oswestry disability index (ODI). Radiological studies, which included assessment of loss of disc space height, intervertebral angle and isodense bone bridging, were used to evaluate the fusion.

RESULTS

  The overall fusion rate was 95.75% at the 24th month after surgery. Ninety-two (97.87%) patients were able to work while 53 patients (56.38%) were capable of performing heavy manual labor. Neurological assessment showed 77 patients (81.92%) had no sensory or motor deficit. The mean JOA score had increased from 15.34 to 28.92 and ODI had decreased from 45 to 15 at the 24th month after surgery. No implant fracture or displacement was found.

CONCLUSION

  The titanium-coated intervertebral fusion cage is effective and safe for treatment of lumbar instability.

Lumbar lordosis restoration following single-level instrumented fusion comparing 4 commonly used techniques

A major sequelae of lumbar fusion is acceleration of adjacent-level degeneration due to decreased lumbar lordosis. We evaluated the effectiveness of 4 common fusion techniques in restoring lordosis: instrumented posterolateral fusion, translumbar interbody fusion, anteroposterior fusion with posterior instrumentation, and anterior interbody fusion with lordotic threaded (LT) cages (Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Memphis, Tennessee). Radiographs were measured preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and a minimum of 6 months postoperatively. Parameters measured included anterior and posterior disk space height, lumbar lordosis from L3 to S1, and surgical level lordosis.No significant difference in demographics existed among the 4 groups. All preoperative parameters were similar among the 4 groups. Lumbar lordosis at final follow-up showed no difference between the anteroposterior fusion with posterior instrumentation, translumbar interbody fusion, and LT cage groups, although the posterolateral fusion group showed a significant loss of lordosis (-10°) (P<.001). Immediately postoperatively and at follow-up, the LT cage group had a significantly greater amount of lordosis and showed maintenance of anterior and posterior disk space height postoperatively compared with the other groups. Instrumented posterolateral fusion produces a greater loss of lordosis compared with anteroposterior fusion with posterior instrumentation, translumbar interbody fusion, and LT cages. Maintenance of lordosis and anterior and posterior disk space height is significantly better with anterior interbody fusion with LT cages.

Acceleration of spinal fusion using COMP-angiopoietin 1 with allografting in a rat model

INTRODUCTION

Allografting has become widely available for the elimination of morbidity due to autogenous bone grafting procedures for spinal fusion. Enhancement of stable bone formation could facilitate this procedure. COMP-Ang1 is a recombinant chimeric protein of angiopoietin-1 that induces angiogenesis and vascular enlargement. We investigated the osteogenic potential of COMP-Ang1 for spinal fusion with allograft based on the enhancement of angiogenesis.

METHODS

Sixty Sprague-Dawley rats underwent bilateral posterior and posterolateral arthrodesis with allograft at L3-4 and L4-5. The animals were divided into three groups (n=20 each): (1) no treatment (sham group); (2) the bovine serum albumin-impregnated collagen sponge group (BSA group); 3) the COMP-Ang1-impregnated collagen sponge group (COMP-Ang1 group). Animals were sacrificed at six weeks for evaluation of spinal fusion using manual palpation, radiographs, and biomechanical and histomorphometric assessments. Total RNA was prepared from the fusion site and analyzed for osteogenic marker protein expression using RT-PCR analysis.

RESULTS

The fusion rates determined by manual palpation were 38.9% in the sham group, 42.1% in the BSA group, and 89.5% in the COMP-Ang1 group. Optical density of fusion masses in the COMP-Ang1 group was significantly higher than those in the sham and BSA groups (p<0.001). Total bone volume was significantly higher in the COMP-Ang1 group than in the sham and BSA groups (p<0.001). The mechanical strength was significantly greater in the COMP-Ang1 group than in the sham and BSA groups (p<0.01). Histologically, the fusion site of the COMP-Ang1 group showed a larger number of reactive bones compared with those in the BSA and sham groups. Immunostaining of endothelial cells for factor VIII revealed that COMP-Ang1 group showed higher levels of vascularity in the fusion site. Runt-related transcription factor 2 and its target genes were significantly up-regulated in the COMP-Ang1 group.

CONCLUSIONS

COMP-Ang1 induced radiologically and histologically demonstrable active osteogenesis by promoting angiogenesis in spinal fusions. It was concluded that COMP-Ang1 enhances spinal fusion and hence the strength of the fusion.

Fusion after minimally disruptive anterior lumbar interbody fusion: Analysis of extreme lateral interbody fusion by computed tomography

BACKGROUND

Less invasive fusion approaches, such as extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF), have proliferated, but few reports have critically assessed fusion rates. To date, no studies have reported computed tomography (CT) documented fusion rates following XLIF.

METHODS

An institutional review board-approved prospective radiographic and CT assessment of minimally disruptive anterior lumbar interbody fusion (mini-ALIF) fusions performed through the XLIF approach. Sixty-six patients (88 operative levels) were examined 12 months after XLIF to determine the rate and quality of anterior lumbar fusion.

RESULTS

Eighty five of the 88 levels (96.6%) were judged fused by CT. Sixty-four of the 66 patients (97.0%) were judged fused by CT. Patient satisfaction at 12 months after surgery was high, with 89.4% reportedly "satisfied or very satisfied" with their results. No revisions were necessary for pseudarthrosis.

CONCLUSION

Mini-ALIF using an XLIF approach reliably results in anterior lumbar fusion.

Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments

Object

Both posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) have been frequently undertaken for lumbar arthrodesis. These procedures use different approaches and cage designs, each of which could affect spine stability, even after the addition of posterior pedicle screw fixation. The objectives of this biomechanical study were to compare PLIF and TLIF, each accompanied by bilateral pedicle screw fixation, with regard to the stability of the fused and adjacent segments.

Methods

Fourteen human L2–S2 cadaveric spine specimens were tested for 6 different modes of motion: flexion, extension, right and left lateral bending, and right and left axial rotation using a load control protocol (LCP). The LCP for each mode of motion utilized moments up to 8.0 Nm at a rate of 0.5 Nm/second with the application of a constant compression follower preload of 400 N. All 14 specimens were tested in the intact state. The specimens were then divided equally into PLIF and TLIF conditions. In the PLIF Group, a bilateral L4–5 partial facetectomy was followed by discectomy and a single-level fusion procedure. In the TLIF Group, a unilateral L4–5 complete facetectomy was performed (and followed by the discectomy and single-level fusion procedure). In the TLIF Group, the implants were initially positioned inside the disc space posteriorly (TLIF-P) and the specimens were tested; the implants were then positioned anteriorly (TLIF-A) and the specimens were retested. All specimens were evaluated at the reconstructed and adjacent segments for range of motion (ROM) and at the adjacent segments for intradiscal pressure (IDP), and laminar strain.

Results

At the reconstructed segment, both the PLIF and the TLIF specimens had significantly lower ROMs compared with those for the intact state (p < 0.05). For lateral bending, the PLIF resulted in a marked decrease in ROM that was statistically significantly greater than that found after TLIF (p < 0.05). In flexion-extension and rotation, the PLIF Group also had less ROM, however, unlike the difference in lateral bending ROM, these differences in ROM values were not statistically significant. Variations in the position of the implants within the disc space were not associated with any significant differences in ROM values (p = 0.43). Analyses of ROM at the adjacent levels L2–3, L3–4, and L5–S1 showed that ROM was increased to some degree in all directions. When compared with that of intact specimens, the ROMs were increased to a statistically significant degree at all adjacent segments in flexion-extension loads (p < 0.05); however, the differences in values among the various operative procedures were not statistically significant. The IDP and facet contact force for the adjacent L3–4 and L5–S1 levels were also increased, but these values were not statistically significantly increased from those for the intact spine (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Regarding stability, PLIF provides a higher immediate stability compared with that of TLIF, especially in lateral bending. Based on our findings, however, PLIF and TLIF, each with posterolateral fusions, have similar biomechanical properties regarding ROM, IDP, and laminar strain at the adjacent segments.

Interbody device endplate engagement effects on motion segment biomechanics

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Stand-alone nonbiologic interbody fusion devices for the lumbar spine have been used for interbody fusion since the early 1990s. However, most devices lack the stability found in clinically successful circumferential fusion constructs. Stability results from cage geometry and device/vertebral endplate interface integrity. To date, there has not been a published comparative biomechanical study specifically evaluating the effects of endplate engagement of interbody devices.

PURPOSE

Lumbar motion segments implanted with three different interbody devices were tested biomechanically to compare the effects of endplate engagement on motion segment rigidity. The degree of additional effect of supplemental posterior and anterior fixation was also investigated.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

A cadaveric study of interbody fusion devices with varying degrees of endplate interdigitation.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Implanted motion segment range of motion (ROM), neutral zone (NZ), stiffness, and disc height.

METHODS

Eighteen human L23 and L45 motion segments were distributed into three interbody groups (n=6 each) receiving a polymeric (polyetheretherketone) interbody spacer with small ridges; a modular interbody device with endplate spikes (InFix, Abbott Spine, Austin, TX, USA); or dual tapered threaded interbody cages (LT [Lordotic tapered] cage; Medtronic, Memphis, TN, USA). Specimens were tested intact using a 7.5-Nm flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial torsion flexibility protocol. Testing was repeated after implantation of the interbody device, anterior plate fixation, and posterior interpedicular fixation. Radiographic measurements determined changes in disc height and intervertebral lordosis. ROM and NZ were calculated and compared using analysis of variance.

RESULTS

The interbody cages with endplate spikes or threads provided a statistically greater increase in disc height versus the polymer spacer (p=.01). Relative to intact, all stand-alone devices significantly reduced ROM in lateral bending by a mean 37% to 61% (p< or =.001). The cages with endplate spikes or threads reduced ROM by approximately 50% and NZ by approximately 60% in flexion-extension (p< or =.02). Only the cage with endplate spikes provided a statistically significant reduction in axial torsion ROM compared with the intact state (50% decrease, p<.001). Posterior fixation provided a significant reduction in ROM in all directions versus the interbody device alone (p<.001). Anterior plating decreased ROM over interbody device alone in flexion-extension and torsion but did not have additional effect on lateral bending ROM.

CONCLUSION

The cages with endplate spikes or threads provide substantial motion segment rigidity compared with intact in bending modes. Only the cages with endplate spikes were more rigid than intact in torsion. All devices experienced increased rigidity with anterior plating and even greater rigidity with posterior fixation. It appears that the endplate engagement with spikes may be beneficial in limiting torsion, which is generally difficult with other "stand-alone" devices tested in the current and prior reports.

Acceleration of spinal fusion using syngeneic and allogeneic adult adipose derived stem cells in a rat model

Posterolateral spinal fusion is the standard treatment for lumbar compression fractures. Adult adipose tissue-derived stem cells (ASCs) promote osteogenesis in vivo and in vitro. The hypothesis tested in this study was that syngeneic and allogeneic ASCs on a biomaterial scaffold composed of tricalcium phosphate and collagen I will accelerate spinal fusion in a rat model. ASCs from male Fischer or ACI rats were loaded onto scaffolds (53,571 cells/mm(3)) and cultured in stromal media for 48 h. Male Fisher rats were assigned to 4 cohorts (n = 14/cohort) after bilateral decortication of the L4 and L5 transverse processes: (1) No treatment; (2) scaffold only; (3) scaffold + syngeneic ASCs; or (4) scaffold + allogeneic ASCs. Half of each cohort was harvested 4 or 8 weeks after surgery. Spinal fusion was evaluated with radiographs, microcomputed tomography, and light microscopy. Callus did not form in spines without scaffolds. There were no significant differences in callus formation among scaffold cohorts 4 weeks after surgery. Callus formation was more mature in both ASC cohorts versus scaffold alone 8 weeks after surgery based on microstructure as well as radiographic and microcomputed tomographic evidence of active bone formation. Inflammatory cell infiltrate was significantly lower in both ASC cohorts (syngeneic = 18.3 +/- 0.85%; allogeneic = 23.5 +/- 2.33%) versus scaffold alone (46.8 +/- 11.8%) 4 weeks after surgery. Results of this study support syngeneic and allogeneic ASC acceleration of posterior lumbar spinal fusion in a rat model.

Screening for nuclear replacement candidates in patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease

BACKGROUND

Nuclear replacement is an emerging surgical treatment for degenerative disc disease (DDD) and low back pain (LBP). While clinical experience is most extensive with the prosthetic disc nucleus PDN (Raymedica, Minneapolis, Minnesota), strict indications apply for the implantation of this device. The purpose of this study was to ascertain what percentage of patients treated surgically for degenerative disc disease with other surgical procedures would have been candidates for nuclear replacement implantation.

METHODS

The charts and films of 85 consecutive patients with failed conservative management for LBP treated surgically with fusion, disc replacement, or annuloplasty were retrospectively reviewed. There were 53 patients with 1-level disease and 32 with 2-level disease, accounting for 117 treated levels. Patients with the following radiographic contraindications to nuclear replacement were serially eliminated: (1) Schmorl's nodes and > 50% collapse of the disc space, (2) irregular/convex endplates on the MRI, (3) complete tears and large annular defects (ie, both incomplete tears and complete tears were eliminated, but patients with local annular deficiency were deemed eligible for nuclear replacement), and (4) a BMI > 30.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine levels (50.4%) had no radiographic contraindications to treatment with a nuclear replacement device. Twelve levels in 10 patients with a BMI > 30 were excluded. Overall, 47 out of 117 levels (40.2%) had no contraindications to a prosthetic nucleus device. The L5-S1 level was the most commonly treated level (55 out of 117, 47%), but only 25.5% had no radiographic contraindications, and overall only 21.8% of the levels were suitable for a nuclear replacement device. Upper lumbar levels (L3-4 and L4-5) had no radiographic contraindications in a higher percentage of cases (68.8% and 72.7%, respectively). The inclusion of the BMI criteria reduced these percentages to 50% and 59.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The surgeon has to assess endplate integrity, disc height, endplate shape, annular integrity, and BMI when offering nuclear replacement as treatment for patients with DDD.

Anterior lumbar interbody fusion in comparison with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: implications for the restoration of foraminal height, local disc angle, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal balance

OBJECT

A primary consideration of all spinal fusion procedures is restoration of normal anatomy, including disc height, lumbar lordosis, foraminal decompression, and sagittal balance. To the authors' knowledge, there has been no direct comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) concerning their capacity to alter those parameters. The authors conducted a retrospective radiographic analysis directly comparing ALIF with TLIF in their capacity to alter foraminal height, local disc angle, and lumbar lordosis.

METHODS

The medical records and radiographs of 32 patients undergoing ALIF and 25 patients undergoing TLIF from between 2000 and 2004 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical data and radiographic measurements, including preoperative and postoperative foraminal height, local disc angle, and lumbar lordosis, were obtained. Statistical analyses included mean values, 95% confidence intervals, and intraobserver/interobserver reliability for the measurements that were performed.

RESULTS

Our results indicate that ALIF is superior to TLIF in its capacity to restore foraminal height, local disc angle, and lumbar lordosis. The ALIF procedure increased foraminal height by 18.5%, whereas TLIF decreased it by 0.4%. In addition, ALIF increased the local disc angle by 8.3 degrees and lumbar lordosis by 6.2 degrees, whereas TLIF decreased the local disc angle by 0.1 degree and lumbar lordosis by 2.1 degrees.

CONCLUSIONS

The ALIF procedure is superior to TLIF in its capacity to restore foraminal height, local disc angle, and lumbar lordosis. The improved radiographic outcomes may be an indication of improved sagittal balance correction, which may lead to better long-term outcomes as shown by other studies. Our data, however, demonstrated no difference in clinical outcome between the two groups at the 2-year follow-up.

Tissue-engineering approach to regenerating the intervertebral disc

In today's world there is an ever increasing incidence of low back pain, which is generally attributed to degeneration of the intervertebral disc (IVD) in those in their second or third decade of life. The most prevalent treatment modalities involve conservative methods (physical therapy and medications) or surgical fusion of the upper and lower vertebral bodies. In the last 10 years, there has been a surge of interest in applying tissue-engineering principles to treat spinal problems associated with the IVD. Tissue engineering provides many promising advantages to treating disc degeneration; it adopts a more biological and reparative approach, whereby the main goal is to restore the properties of the disc to its pre-degenerative state. This review outlines the physiology of the IVD and the etiology of disc degeneration. Much of the research carried out in the field of tissue engineering is based on three predominant constituents: cells, scaffolds, and signals. Thus, specific attention is given to these constituents and their potential use in repairing the IVD. Some of the significant challenges involved in IVD tissue engineering are also identified, and a brief discussion regarding possible future areas of research follows.

Changes in the lumbar foramen following anterior interbody fusion with tapered or cylindrical cages

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) using both cylindrical and tapered threaded interbody cages has been shown to restore disc height, reduce segmental motion, and relieve low back pain. The effectiveness of these stand-alone cage designs in restoration and maintenance of intervertebral foraminal dimensions has received little attention.

PURPOSE

To investigate the effects of anterior implantation of cylindrical and tapered interbody cages on morphologic changes of the lumbar neuroforamen and maintenance of foraminal dimensions under dynamic loading.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

A biomechanical study using bovine calf spine model to compare the deformation of foraminal space after ALIF with either tapered cages or cylindrical cages.

METHODS

Sixteen fresh calf spines were randomly assigned to undergo ALIF at the L3-L4 level using either two threaded cylindrical or two tapered cages. Lumbar spines were subjected to unconstrained loading in flexion, extension, and lateral bending. Rotation of the L3-L4 segment and dynamic deformation in foraminal height were obtained through a motion analysis system, and compared between the two cage groups. Foraminal dimensions were assessed before and after tapered or cylindrical cage implantation with digitized measurement of bilateral foraminal molds.

RESULTS

Regardless of cage design, anterior implantation of cages increased neuroforaminal area by 17% (p=.0005) and increased the foraminal height by 9% (p=.0004) in the neutral unloaded position. In dynamic loading conditions, foraminal height was significantly stabilized in all loading directions by the cylindrical cages (p=.01) and on both sides during lateral bending by the tapered cages (p<.03). Foraminal stabilization provided by either cage was most prominent in the direction of lateral bending (26-37% of the intact values), while cylindrical cages also provided substantial stabilization in flexion (26% of the intact value). Significant linear relationships were found between foraminal height and residual fusion segment motion under dynamic loading conditions.

CONCLUSION

Results from this bovine model biomechanical study indicate that stand-alone anterior interbody fusion cages with either tapered or cylindrical design are effective in restoring neuroforaminal height and stabilize the spine to withstand foraminal deformation during daily loading. The degree of stabilization was influenced substantially by the loading direction, to a lesser degree by the cage type, and was strongly dependent on the segment mobility. Although bovine lumbar spine is widely accepted for comparative studies, direct clinical interpretation should be made with caution owing to the anatomical differences from human.

Tapered cages in anterior lumbar interbody fusion: biomechanics of segmental reactions

Object

The aim of this study was to determine the in vitro biomechanical responses of lumbar spinal segments after implantation of tapered cages.

Methods

Range of motion (ROM)– and stiffness-related data were determined in 10 human cadaveric T12–S1 columns subjected to flexion, extension, and lateral bending modes before and after anterior lumbar interbody fusion in which stand-alone LT-CAGE devices were used. The overall column showed no significant changes in ROM or stiffness. At the instrumented level, stiffness increased significantly (p < 0.05) in flexion and lateral bending modes. Indications of instability in extension were present, but these values were not statistically significant. There was no evidence of adjacent-level instability at any level in any mode, except for the segment superior to the fixation level in flexion; here there was a significant increase in ROM (p < 0.05) and a decrease in stiffness.

Conclusions

The anatomical conformity and bilateral placement of cages provide ample stability and rigidity at the treated level, comparable to that of other cage systems. Because hypermobility is traditionally related to early degenerative changes, the present results appear to suggest that cages do not significantly contribute to such alterations.

The Correlation Between Preoperative Disc Space Height and Clinical Outcomes After Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether preoperative disc space height (DSH) influences the clinical outcomes of patients diagnosed with single-level symptomatic discogenic disease and treated with a stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion with two tapered threaded fusion cages, we performed a retrospective analysis of 392 patients.

METHODS

Preoperative radiographs were used to establish four study groups based on the patients' DSH: the tall disc group: DSH >15 mm; the intermediate tall group: DSH ranging from 10 to 15 mm; the intermediate collapsed group: DSH ranging from 5 to 10 mm; and the collapsed disc group: DSH <5 mm.

RESULTS

All of the patient groups exhibited improvement in their clinical outcomes. However, patients in the collapsed disc group (DSH of <5 mm) tended to have earlier and greater improvement in Oswestry Disability Index scores, Physical Component Summary scores of the Short Form-36, and Visual Analog Scale scores for low back pain.

CONCLUSION

Symptomatic disc degeneration can be readily identified with plain radiographic findings, and patients' symptoms can often be relieved predictably with a stand-alone interbody fusion procedure.

Biomechanical comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion performed at 1 and 2 levels

STUDY DESIGN

Biomechanical laboratory study of human cadaveric spines.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the difference in acute stability between posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) performed at 1 and 2 levels with and without posterior fixation.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Circumferential spinal fusion with both an interbody graft and posterior pedicle screw-rod construct has been advocated to decrease pseudarthrosis rates. Both PLIF and TLIF theoretically allow for 3-column fixation and fusion.

METHODS

Specimens underwent either PLIF or TLIF at L2-L3 (single-level) and L3-L4 (2-level), both with and without pedicle screw instrumentation. During TLIF, an interbody allograft was placed in the anterior or middle column. Nondestructive, nonconstraining pure moment loading was applied to each specimen.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the range of motion after either PLIF or TLIF at 1 level. The addition of pedicle screws tended more strongly to increase rigidity after 1-level PLIF compared to TLIF. Position of the TLIF graft did not affect stability. The addition of pedicle screws to a 2-level construct significantly reduced all motions tested.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our findings, posterior fixation with a pedicle screw-rod construct is suggested for 1-level PLIF and TLIF, and is necessary to achieve stability after interbody fusion across 2 levels using either technique.

Indications for surgical fusion of the cervical and lumbar motion segment

STUDY DESIGN

A literature review and the authors' clinical experience for the indication of fusion in the degenerative lumbar and cervical spine is provided.

OBJECTIVE

To establish absolute and relative criteria for the indication for fusion in the degenerative cervical and lumbar spine.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Fusion in the cervical and lumbar degenerative spine is indicated under certain strict criteria. However, fusion in circumstances not meeting these criteria is controversial.

METHOD

A review of the literature and the authors' experience concerning indication and criteria of fusion in degenerative, lumbar, and cervical spine is provided.

RESULTS

Fusion for the unstable spine related to trauma, infection, and tumors is relatively accepted. However, indications for fusion for degenerative, cervical, and lumbar spine are more controversial.

CONCLUSION

Lumbar and cervical fusion in the degenerative spine is frequently performed. Certain criteria have been established when a fusion should be considered. However, even these are not universally accepted. Strict prospective studies are needed to determine when a fusion of the degenerative, cervical, and lumbar spine is indicated. Patients with severe radicular pain may be considered for surgery after a comprehensive trial of conservative management. Fusion is usually necessary after a cervical discectomy, especially when spondylosis or osteophytic compression is present. Lumbar fusion is rarely indicated for routine discectomy. In patients with mechanical back or neck pain, surgery should only be considered after conservative measures have been exhausted and a radiographic abnormality is present at the symptomatic level, perhaps with pain concordant with discographic findings. Careful patient selection is the key to obtaining favorable surgical outcomes. In many cases, the goal may be a return to functionality rather than achieving a completely asymptomatic state.

Bone morphogenetic proteins in anterior lumbar interbody fusion: old techniques and new technologies

Object. The author reports the clinical and radiographic outcomes obtained in three prospective multicenter clinical trials in which recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein—2 (rhBMP-2) was used in anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF).

Methods. Stand-alone interbody fusion cages were used, and supplemental fixation was not performed as part of the study protocol. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two ALIF groups: one in which autologous iliac crest bone graft was used (control) and one in which an rhBMP-2—coated absorbable collagen sponge was placed (investigational group). In all patients who underwent rhBMP-2—augmented fusion, imaging demonstrated evidence of bone induction and early incorporation of the cortical allografts. Overall, more expedient clinical improvements and higher success rates were observed in the rhBMP-2 group.

Conclusions. In these studies it was shown that rhBMP-2 is a safe and effective material for facilitating ALIF and for decreasing pain and improving clinical outcomes.