Pediatric clinical pharmacology of digoxin

Guidelines on paediatric dosing on the basis of developmental physiology and pharmacokinetic considerations

The approach to paediatric drug dosing needs to be based on the physiological characteristics of the child and the pharmacokinetic parameters of the drug. This review summarises the current knowledge on developmental changes in absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion and combines this knowledge with in vivo and in vitro pharmacokinetic data that are currently available. In addition, dosage adjustments based on practical problems, such as child-friendly formulations and feeding regimens, disease state, genetic make-up and environmental influences are presented. Modification of a dosage based on absorption, depends on the route of absorption, the physico chemical properties of the drug and the age of the child. For oral drug absorption, a distinction should be made between the very young and children over a few weeks old. In the latter case, it is likely that practical considerations, like appropriate formulations, have much greater relevance to oral drug absorption. The volume of distribution (V(d)) may be altered in children. Hydrophilic drugs with a high V(d) in adults should be normalised to bodyweight in young children (age <2 years), whereas hydrophilic drugs with a low V(d) in adults should be normalised to body surface area (BSA) in these children. For drugs that are metabolised by the liver, the effect of the V(d) becomes apparent in children <2 months of age. In general, only the first dose should be based on the V(d); subsequent doses should be determined by the clearance. Pharmacokinetic studies on renal and liver function clarify that a distinction should be made between maturation and growth of the organs. After the maturation process has finished, the main influences on the clearance of drugs are growth and changes in blood flow of the liver and kidney. Drugs that are primarily metabolised by the liver should be administered with extreme care until the age of 2 months. Modification of dosing should be based on response and on therapeutic drug monitoring. At the age of 2-6 months, a general guideline based on bodyweight may be used. After 6 months of age, BSA is a good marker as a basis for drug dosing. However, even at this age, drugs that are primarily metabolised by cytochrome P450 2D6 and uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase should be normalised to bodyweight. In the first 2 years of life, the renal excretion rate should be determined by markers of renal function, such as serum creatinine and p-aminohippuric acid clearance. A dosage guideline for drugs that are significantly excreted by the kidney should be based on the determination of renal function in first 2 years of life. After maturation, the dose should be normalised to BSA. These guidelines are intended to be used in clinical practice and to form a basis for more research. The integration of these guidelines, and combining them with pharmacodynamic effects, should be considered and could form a basis for further study.

The use of digoxin-specific Fab fragments for severe digitalis intoxication in children

BACKGROUND

Because life-threatening digitalis intoxication is unusual in children, treatment with digoxin-specific-antibody Fab fragments (Fab) has rarely been reported. We describe the efficacy of Fab in the treatment of children with severe digitalis intoxication.

METHODS

Twenty-nine children with intoxication due to digoxin (28) or digitoxin (1) received Fab at 21 participating hospitals between 1974 and 1986. Data were gathered about the patients' medical illnesses, doses and serum concentrations of digitalis, responses to Fab therapy, and outcomes.

RESULTS

In the infants and young children with acute digoxin intoxication, the digoxin doses ranged from 0.30 to 0.96 mg per kilogram of body weight; two adolescents had severe intoxication after doses of only 0.20 and 0.26 mg per kilogram. The serum digoxin concentrations ranged from 3.0 to greater than 100 ng per milliliter (mean, 13.8). Atrioventricular block (present in 22 patients [76 percent]) was the most common sign of toxicity. All the patients in this series had severe disturbances of cardiac rhythm, hyperkalemia (mean serum potassium concentration, 5.4 mmol per liter), or both. In 27 patients (93 percent), digitalis toxicity resolved after the administration of Fab. Of the 19 patients for whom data were available on the timing of the response to Fab, 15 responded within 180 minutes. Three patients required retreatment with Fab. Seven died of complications unrelated to the administration of Fab.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend that Fab be used in the treatment of digitalis poisoning in infants and young children who have ingested greater than or equal to 0.3 mg of digoxin per kilogram, who have underlying heart disease, or who have a serum digoxin concentration of greater than or equal to 6.4 nmol per liter (greater than or equal to 5.0 ng per milliliter) in the elimination phase; and who also have a life-threatening arrhythmia, hemodynamic instability, hyperkalemia, or rapidly progressive toxicity. Adolescents, who are more sensitive to the toxic effects of digoxin than younger children, may require treatment with Fab after ingesting lower doses.

Renal clearance of imipenem in children

Imipenem renal clearance was studied in six children (three males, three females; 2.9-11.2 years of age) following a single intravenous dose (21.7 +/- 5.1 mg/kg) of imipenem/cilastatin (1:1). In an approximately six-hour period following drug administration, 65.3 +/- 9.7% of the imipenem dose was excreted in the urine unchanged. The renal clearance (280.03 +/- 24.34 ml/min/1.73 m2) of imipenem was found to account for 69.2% of the corresponding plasma imipenem clearance (404.89 +/- 24.83 ml/min/1.73 m2). Contrary to existing adult data, the imipenem renal clearance in our subjects was 1.95-fold greater than the estimated creatinine clearance, suggesting significant tubular secretion of imipenem in children. Examination of urinary imipenem excretion rate versus plasma concentration relationships in three of the children revealed a potential renal tubular reabsorption component for imipenem in children. Comparison of renal imipenem clearance data in these children to similar data from adults suggests that quantitatively important developmental differences may exist for the renal handling of imipenem.