The organization of a pediatric critical care transport program

Simulation in neonatal transport medicine

The safe transport of infants in critical condition requires highly reliable inter-professional transport teams that are equipped with the expertise to provide neonatal care in unfamiliar and resource-limited environments. Increasingly, transport teams are comprised of health professionals from various disciplines. Providing didactic and experiential learning alone is insufficient to fully prepare teams that have limited exposure to rare events. Simulation-based training supplements and reinforces knowledge, skills, and the experiences of team members. This article presents the current use of simulation in the training of neonatal transport teams and critically reviews how simulation methodologies may be further incorporated into curricula and quality improvement to achieve high-reliability teams.

The impact of transfer on pediatric trauma outcomes

BACKGROUND

Recently, concerns have been raised over delays that result from transferring patients to designated trauma centers. This study aimed to assess whether transfer status had an impact on pediatric trauma outcomes.

METHODS

Using a local 1996-2014 pediatric trauma database containing 1541 patients, the following outcomes were tested: death, major complication, time to definitive treatment (TDT), hospital length of stay (LOS), and ICU length of stay (ICU LOS). Logistic, generalized linear, and Poisson regression models were used.

RESULTS

Mortality and complication rates did not differ significantly between direct (mortality=52/1000, complications=54/1000) and transferred (mortality=59/1000; complications=67/1000) patients (mortality aRR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.76-1.80, p=0.48; complication aRR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.75-1.70, p=0.57). Transfer status was not a significant predictor of ICU LOS (p=0.72). Transfer status was a significant predictor of time to definitive treatment (transfer x-=17.4h vs. direct x-=2.6h, p=0.0035) and of LOS for severely injured patients (p=0.005). The significant predictors of pediatric trauma mortality were: ISS, transport mode, age, and TDT, and of major complication were ISS and TDT.

CONCLUSIONS

Although transferred patients had longer time to specialized care, there were no significant differences in the mortality or complication rates between transferred and direct patients after adjusting for injury severity.

Effect of transport team interventions on stabilization time in neonatal and pediatric interfacility transports

INTRODUCTION

During interfacility transport, the length of time taken by the transport team to prepare the patient for transport is often perceived as a problem by referring hospital staff. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects on time at the referring hospital of the number and complexity of interventions performed by the transport team to stabilize the patient prior to transfer.

SETTING

Interfacility transfers by the provincial infant transport team (ITT) to British Columbia's Children's Hospital.

METHODS

This was a prospective study of emergency neonatal and pediatric interfacility transfers. After each transport, the team completed a questionnaire about interventions performed and stabilization time. Transports were classified by the complexity of interventions performed: none, low (intravenous line, blood gas, nasogastric tube, Foley catheter, oxygen administration), or high (intubation, central venous access, arterial lines, chest tube insertion).

RESULTS

Thirty of 55 transports required no intervention (mean stabilization time=52+/-25 min). Sixteen transports required low level intervention (mean=60+/-22 min). Nine transports required high level intervention (mean=140+/-52 min). The stabilization times for "no" and "low" levels of intervention were not significantly different (P=.3), but the time for "high" level intervention was significantly higher (P<.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The need for the transport team paramedics to perform high level interventions significantly increased the time at the referring hospital. In contrast, the time taken for them to perform or reperform low level interventions, whether one procedure or two, was not a significant source of delay.

Cost-effectiveness and choice of infant transport systems

OBJECTIVE

To compare cost-effectiveness of three types of infant transport models (Emergency Medical Technicians [EMT], Registered Nurses [RN], or Combined Teams [CT] of RNs and Respiratory Therapists) and to derive a decision model to guide choice of a transport system.

RESEARCH DESIGN

A prospective, multicenter, observational study was conducted to compare infant physiologic status before and after transport. Cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of the third-party payer, sensitivity analysis and threshold analysis were performed.

SUBJECTS

All (n = 1931) out born infants with complete transport data admitted to 11 regional tertiary-level Canadian NICUs from January 1996 to October 1997.

MEASURES

Change in Transport Risk Index of Physiologic Stability (TRIPS) Score before and after transport, transport costs.

RESULTS

Change in TRIPS was predicted by gestational age at transport, transport duration, and pretransport TRIPS score, but not the type (EMT, RN, CT) of transport team, mode (air/ground) or direction (forward/retrograde) of transport, presence of a physician, and other baseline population risks (sex, small for gestational age, antenatal corticosteroid treatment, Apgar score). The RN model is least costly under most assumptions. At high transport volumes (>2760 transports per year) and long average transport times (>6.8 h per transport), the EMT model was less costly. Cost drivers of transport were volume of transport, relative wages of transport personnel, and percent of waiting time dedicated to infant transport.

CONCLUSIONS

A deterministic decision-analytic model can be used to model transport cost-effectiveness and derive a threshold analytic chart for identifying the least costly transport model.

Transferring patients to a pediatric trauma center: the transferring hospital's perspective

The rationale behind a regionalized trauma system is that patient outcomes are improved when trauma patients are rapidly transported to facilities with the level of expertise need to treat their injury. Functioning as an adult Level II trauma center, we wanted to know how the transfer process worked for pediatric patients whom we transfer to a Level I pediatric trauma center, which is part of the same multihospital system. Complete information on time of arrival, the time the transfer was accepted, and patient departure time were available for 116 patients (72% of pediatric patients transferred) for the period of January 1, 1997 through June 30, 1998. Patients were retrospectively stratified into two priority groups representing differing transport priority, based on use of a nasogastric tube, endotracheal tube or Foley catheter. Means for decision time and total time in transferring hospital were inspected. Decision time was 44 minutes (standard error 4.5 minutes) for priority patients and 92 minutes (11.5) for non-priority patients (t = 2.94, df = 114, P = 0.004). Total time for priority patients was 129 minutes (7.6) and 197 minutes (14.0) for non-priority patients (t = 3.37, df = 114, P = 0.001). Decision time was not influenced by extensive injury assessment or secondary studies. On average, pediatric patients spent nearly three hours in our facility. Our data indicate that a shorter decision time did not necessarily result in a reduction in wait time. Improving pediatric transfer times requires attention not only to injury assessment processes at the transferring facility and interhospital communications but also mobilization, hand-over, and any space or personnel constraints at the receiving pediatric facility.

Resident training in pediatric critical care transport medicine: a survey of pediatric residency programs

OBJECTIVE

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Program Requirement for Pediatrics includes specific objectives that pediatric residents participate in both the pre-hospital care of acutely ill or injured patients and the stabilization and transport of patients to critical care areas. Previously, residents were often included as the physician component for many pediatric critical care transport teams. Subsequent regionalization of transport services and development of nurse-only transport teams prompted us to determine the current level of resident participation in pediatric critical care transport as well as how individual residency programs were meeting the educational objectives.

METHODS

A questionnaire was mailed to each pediatric residency program listed in the 1996-1997 GME Directory. Information was obtained regarding the size of the hospital and the residency program, the presence of a pediatric critical care transport team, the number of annual transports, and transport team leader. In addition, the use of pediatric residents for transports was ascertained, as well as their specific role, training requirements, and method of evaluation.

RESULTS

Data were received from 138 programs for a return rate of 65%. Eighty percent of programs offered a pediatric critical care transport service. Nurse-led teams were used for 51% of NICU and 44% of PICU transports. Of the 82 NICU and 84 PICU teams that used residents, the majority used them as team leaders (60% and 70%; respectively) with only the minority requiring that they be at the PL-3 year or greater. The training and/or certification required for resident participation in transports varied among programs, with 85% requiring completion of a NICU or PICU rotation, and 94% requiring NRP or PALS certification. Programs that did not allow resident participation provided exposure to Transport Medicine by various mechanisms, including lectures and emergency department (ED) rotations.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric resident participation in critical care transport varies widely among pediatric critical care transport teams. The degree to which residents participate in the transport team would appear to have diminished in comparison to previous studies. Transport teams often use other resources, such as nurses, fellows, or attendings, to lead their transport teams. Pediatric resident exposure to and participation in Transport Medicine varies among programs, as do the methods used to prepare residents for their experience.

Emergency medical services for children: a general pediatrician's perspective

The EMSC movement is still in its infancy, and there is much that remains to be done. The primary care pediatrician plays a major role in the EMSC system and should continue to advocate for efficient, high-quality pediatric emergency care. In summary, there are several ways that the office-based pediatrician can and should become involved with EMSC: 1. Pediatricians should emphasize safe and injury prevention at each health maintenance visit throughout a child's life. 2. Pediatricians should encourage all parents to become certified in BLS/CPR. Ideally, training in CPR should be provided during prenatal and childbirth classes. 3. Pediatricians should advocate for injury prevention and safety campaigns in their communities. They can also become involved with efforts to develop legislation dealing with issues in injury prevention and safety. 4. Pediatricians should ensure that all children receive the appropriate immunizations. 5. Pediatricians need to maintain office emergency preparedness. All office personnel should maintain certification in BLS as a minimum and ideally, PALS. Equipment used for pediatric resuscitation should be available and functional. Monthly mock codes should be scheduled to ensure that all personnel clearly know their roles and responsibilities in the event of an emergency. 6. Pediatricians should maintain their skills in emergency pediatrics. In addition, they should maintain certification in PALS. Continuing medical education (CME) workshops and conferences in emergency pediatrics are available throughout the year. Also, pediatricians can maintain their airway management skills by practicing endotracheal intubation in the operating room setting. 7. Pediatricians must become familiar with the prehospital care providers, EDs, and transport services in their communities. Association with a pediatric intensive care unit at a tertiary care center would also be beneficial. 8. Pediatricians must be available for consultation to local EDs. They must realize that, in many instances, they may represent the physician who is most experienced with caring for the critically ill or injured child. 9. Pediatricians can serve as medical advisors to the EMS systems in their communities. 10. Pediatricians should stay well informed on issues pertaining to EMSC.

The epidemiology of pediatric air medical transports in Utah

OBJECTIVE

To describe the air-transported patients treated at Primary Children's Medical Center (PCMC), the sole pediatric tertiary care center in Utah and a referral center in the intermountain region. This study describes the patients who utilized the air medical transport system, the medical services provided in the prehospital setting, and the corresponding charges for transport and treatment.

METHODS

Participants were air-transported patients aged 17 years and less who were treated at PCMC during the calendar years 1991-1992. The study population excluded patients who were transported to other medical facilities, and newborns. Data were abstracted retrospectively from the patients' medical and transport records. Data collected included demographic information, patient diagnoses, and treatments performed during transport. Financial data were supplied by the hospital.

RESULTS

During the study period, 874 pediatric patients met the participant criteria. Helicopter and fixed-wing transports comprised 561 and 313, respectively, from nine states in the mountain and western regions. The majority (313, 56%) of the patients transported by helicopter were trauma patients, while the majority (195, 62%) of fixed-wing transports were for illness-related conditions. Scene transports accounted for 120 (21%) of helicopter transports. Children with special health care needs accounted for 171 (20%) of all transports.

CONCLUSIONS

Injury severity scores indicate that, overall, air-transported patients were more severely injured than comparable ground-transported patients. However, it is apparent that some patients who were air-transported could have been transported by ground ambulance without detriment. medical services.

The pediatric sedation unit: a mechanism for pediatric sedation

OBJECTIVES

We have created a pediatric sedation unit (PSU) in response to the need for uniform, safe, and appropriately monitored sedation and/or analgesia for children undergoing invasive and noninvasive studies or procedures in a large tertiary care medical center. The operational characteristics of the PSU are described in this report, as is our clinical experience in the first 8 months of operation.

METHODS

A retrospective review of quality assurance data was performed. These data included patient demographics and chronic medical diagnoses, procedure, or study performed; sedative or analgesic medication given; complications (defined prospectively); and sedation and monitoring time. Patient-specific medical records related to the procedure and sedation were reviewed if a complication was noted in the quality assurance data.

RESULTS

Briefly, the PSU was staffed with an intensivist and pediatric intensive care unit nurses. Patients were admitted to the PSU and assessed medically for risk factors during sedation. Continuous heart rate, respiratory rate, and pulse oximetry monitoring were used, and blood pressure was determined every 5 minutes. After sedation and stabilization, with monitoring continued, the patient was transported to the site to undergo the procedure or study. The pediatric intensive care unit nurse remained with the patient at all times. All necessary emergency equipment was transported with the patient. After the procedure or study was completed, the patient was returned to the PSU for recovery to predetermined parameters. We were able to analyze 458 episodes of sedation for this review. Procedures and studies included radiologic examinations, cardiac catheterization, orthopedic manipulations, solid organ and bone marrow biopsy, gastrointestinal endoscopy, bronchoscopy, evoked potential measurements, and others. Patients were 2 weeks to 32 years of age. The average time from initiation of sedation to last dose of medication administered was 84 minutes. The average time from initiation of sedation to full recovery was 120 minutes. Sedative and analgesia medications use was not standardized; however, the majority of children needing sedation received propofol or midazolam. For patients requiring analgesia, ketamine or fentanyl was added. In 79 of 458 (12%) sedation episodes, complications were documented. Mild hypotension (4.4%), pulse oximetry <93% (2.6%), apnea (1.5%), and transient airway obstruction (1.3%) were the most common complications noted. Cancellation of 11 (2.4%) procedures was attributable to complications. No long-term morbidity or mortality was seen.

CONCLUSIONS

Many children require sedation or analgesia during procedures or studies. Safe sedation is best ensured by appropriate presedation risk assessment and with monitoring by a care provider trained in resuscitative measures who is not involved in performing the procedure itself. Uniformity of care in a large institution is a standard met by the creation of a centralized service, with active input from the department of anesthesiology. We present the PSU as a model for achieving these goals.

Setting up a paediatric retrieval team

In this article some aspects to be considered when setting up a paediatric retrieval service are examined. These include equipment problems to be overcome, selection and training of staff, and communication issues. For the purposes of the article the words 'retrieval', 'transfer', and 'transport' teams, are used interchangeably for the same meaning.

Transport of the critically ill child

During the past several decades, the transport of critically ill patients to and between hospitals has gradually improved. The major indications that necessitate emergency transport for adult patients are trauma and acute cardiac disease, and the establishment of transport teams trained in the care of these conditions has improved the outcome of adult patients. In critically ill children, the indications for emergency transport differ from those in adults; pediatric patients are most likely to be transported for respiratory and neurologic emergencies. The outcome for critically ill children is optimal when a dedicated pediatric transport team functions in the setting of a regional critical-care outreach program. Such a program emphasizes stabilization of the child's condition at the local hospital, followed by transport to a pediatric intensive-care facility by a specially trained pediatric transport team. In this review, we present an overview of the principles and operating procedures of such pediatric transport teams.