Depression following hysterectomy

Depression Following Hysterectomy and the Influencing Factors

BACKGROUND

Hysterectomy is one of the most common gynecological surgeries performed worldwide. However, women undergoing this surgery often experience negative emotional reactions.

OBJECTIVES

This study was done with the aim of investigating the relationship between hysterectomy and postoperative depression, three months after the procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This longitudinal study was conducted in the province of Khorasan-Razavi in Iran, using multistage sampling. At first, three cities were selected from the province by cluster sampling; then, five hospitals were randomly selected from these cities. The participants included 53 women who were hysterectomy candidates in one of the five selected hospitals. The participants' demographics and hysterectomy procedure information were entered into two separate questionnaires, and the Beck depression inventory (BDI) was employed to measure their severity of depression before and three months after the surgery. The statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) version 16 was used for the statistical analysis, and a P value of < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

The means and standard deviations of the participants' depression scores before and three months after their hysterectomies were 13.01 ± 10.1 and 11.02 ± 10.3, respectively. Although the mean score of depression decreased three months after the hysterectomy, the difference was not statistically significant. However, a significant relationship was found between the satisfaction with the outcome of the hysterectomy and the postoperative depression score (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, undergoing a hysterectomy did not show a relationship with postoperative depression three months after the surgery. Moreover, the only factor related to depression following a hysterectomy was satisfaction with the surgery.

Psychological outcomes after hysterectomy for benign conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Hysterectomy is one of the commonest operative procedures in the developed world, mostly occurring among premenopausal women, with contradictory results regarding post-operative psychological wellbeing. This review aims to inform practice by examining whether hysterectomy predicts depression or anxiety outcomes. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO electronic databases for articles published before November 2012. Reference lists of relevant articles were hand searched, and expert opinions were sought. Refereed studies investigating an association between hysterectomy for benign (non-cancerous) conditions and post-operative symptoms of depression or anxiety were chosen for this review. Two authors independently abstracted data from original articles. Authors of relevant studies were contacted for data that could not be extracted from the published articles. Review Manager 5.1 was used throughout the meta-analysis to calculate the summary relative risks (RRs), and the weighted standardized mean difference (WstdMD), and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). A random effects model was used in data analysis and verified using a fixed effect model. Overall, hysterectomy was associated with a decreased risk of clinically relevant depression (RR=1.69, 95% CI 1.19-2.38). Additionally, hysterectomy was associated with a decrease in standardized depression outcomes (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.38 (95% CI 0.27-0.49)). Conversely, there was no significant association between hysterectomy and risk of clinically relevant anxiety (RR=1.41, 95% CI 0.72-2.75). In conclusion, data from before and after studies suggest that hysterectomy for benign gynecological conditions is not adversely associated with anxiety and may be positively rather than adversely associated with depression.

Understanding pre- and post-hysterectomy levels of negative affect: a stress moderation model approach

Before and after hysterectomy, 60 women completed self-report questionnaires. Measures of personality (NEO-Five Factor Inventory, NEO-FFI), coping (Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations, CISS), and procedure appraisal were completed pre-operatively. Measures of depression and anxiety were completed pre- and post-operatively. Pre-op, 34% of women reported depression at clinical levels, and 29% reported clinical anxiety. The prevalence of depression fell to 8% 3-months post-op although clinical levels of anxiety persisted post-op in 22% of women. Regression analyses revealed that the principal risk factors for post-op negative affect were pre-op levels of depression and concerns about hysterectomy outcome. In assessing proposed models of post-hysterectomy outcome, structural equational modelling revealed the key position of neuroticism and extraversion, which were both directly and indirectly related to pre- and post-operative depression and anxiety. The mediating variables in this model included coping dispositions and procedure appraisal. It is concluded that the variables contained within stress moderation models provide a useful framework for understanding the processes that may lead to elevated levels of negative affect both before and after hysterectomy. Such an approach may prove beneficial for other surgical-outcome studies.

Psychological distress of conservative and nonconservative uterine surgery: a prospective study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study is to evaluate the psychological reaction to conization before and after the operation compared to hysterectomy. To study the incidence of psychological stress related to conization, 60 women undergoing conization were compared to 40 women who had undergone hysterectomy.

METHOD

Psychological disease was rated in the pre- and postoperative periods using the Symptom Questionnaire (SQ). Each patient was evaluated 2 weeks before the operation, and 3, 6 and 12 months after it.

RESULTS

Both the conization and hysterectomy groups showed a significant reduction in anxiety and depression at the 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-ups compared to the preoperative period. Two weeks before surgery, 8 conization patients (19.5%) showed an anxious status, while 10 (24.3%) presented high levels of anxiety and depression. Within hysterectomy patients, the occurrence was respectively of 4 (12.9%) and 10 women (32.2%). Twelve months after surgery, of the women with preoperative depression, only four (9.7%) conization and four (12.9%) hysterectomy patients presented a negative mood status. A similar trend was present for somatic symptoms but only in the conization group, because the hysterectomy patients did not show a reduction in these symptoms from the preoperative to the postoperative period. This result could be related to the surgical menopause due to the bilateral oophoriectomy executed in more than half of the hysterectomy group.

CONCLUSION

In general, the results of the present study show that the conservative and nonconservative uterine surgery determines a good psychological prognosis in the short- and long-term postoperative periods.

A prospective study of the short-term outcomes of hysterectomy with and without oophorectomy

OBJECTIVE

To determine the symptom profile and satisfaction rate for women undergoing hysterectomy with and without oophorectomy

STUDY DESIGN

Women under 46 years of age who underwent hysterectomy with (n = 266) and without oophorectomy (n = 57) were followed for six months.

RESULTS

Satisfaction was high at six months. In-hospital complication rates were 28% in Group 1 and 39% in Group 2 (p = 0.11). Pelvic pain was reported in more than half the women at six weeks. A reduction in constipation, diarrhoea, abdominal and pelvic pain, and depression was reported at six months. Quality of sexual function in women did not improve. New symptoms of pelvic pain or depression were present at six months in more than 16% to 37% of the women. Regrets about loss of fertility were increased at six months.

CONCLUSIONS

Although levels of satisfaction with the procedure of hysterectomy were high, new symptoms and regrets about the loss of fertility were commonly reported.

Symptom experience in women after hysterectomy

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature addressing the symptom experience of women after hysterectomy.

DATA SOURCES

Computerized searches in MEDLINE and CINAHL, as well as texts and references cited in articles. Key concepts in the searches included hysterectomy, sleep disturbance and pain, hysterectomy and fatigue, hysterectomy, depression, and depressed mood.

STUDY SELECTION

Articles and comprehensive works relevant to key concepts and published after 1970, with an emphasis on new findings from 1990 to 2000. Sixty-four citations were identified as useful to this review.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were organized under the following headings: women and hysterectomy, biopsychosocial perspectives, common symptoms after hysterectomy (pain, disturbed sleep, fatigue, depressed mood, anxiety), and significance of review (implications).

DATA SYNTHESIS

Literature suggests that after a hysterectomy, women experience complications during the postoperative recovery period that may vary with the type of surgical procedure. During this period, the quantity and quality of sleep as well as other symptoms (pain, fatigue, anxiety, and depression) are influenced by various physiologic, psychologic, and social factors. Despite limited evidence that sleep problems may occur frequently during the recovery period, only a few researchers have systematically examined sleep patterns in women after hysterectomy. None of these studies, however, used objective sleep measures or examined multiple dimensions of these women's lives.

CONCLUSIONS

This review conceptualized the women's symptom experience as the experience of specific symptoms (pain, sleep disturbance, fatigue, depressed mood, and anxiety) that were influenced by biopsychosocial factors.

The psychological outcome of hysterectomy

The objective of this study is to review the published literature on psychological outcome of hysterectomy and oophorectomy for non-malignant indications. The relevant publications over the past 30 years until the end of 1997 were identified by a MEDLINE computer search. This was followed by hand searches of the relevant references in the literature identified by the electronic search. The published studies on the psychological outcome of hysterectomy have been selected to identify the incidence, possible causes and risk factors of psychological morbidity, and the measures that can be adopted to improve the outcome. The study showed that the majority of retrospective studies reported an adverse psychological outcome after hysterectomy. However, all prospective studies showed that the incidence of depressed mood is higher even before hysterectomy, owing to pre-existing psychiatric illness and personality and psychosocial problems, as a result of the emotional response to gynecological symptoms or as a manifestation of associated ovarian failure. Hence, the therapeutic effects of hysterectomy include improvement of mood in some but not all patients, unless proper case selection, psychiatric evaluation and preoperative counselling are arranged. An early detection of ovarian failure after hysterectomy, the initiation of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) immediately after surgery in perimenopausal women and in those undergoing oophorectomy, as well as regular follow-ups to ensure long-term compliance with HRT, would also improve the psychological outcome. In conclusion hysterectomy itself is not the cause of any adverse psychological outcome. Psychological symptoms actually improve in the majority of women, with the relief of distressing gynecological symptoms and the correction of ovarian hormone deficiency, but hysterectomy may not be of any benefit in women with prior psychiatric illness and those with personality and psychosocial problems.

Hysterectomy: what do women need and want to know?

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to describe women's experiences of hysterectomy and to identify their fears, concerns, and met as well as unmet health care needs.

DESIGN

Narrative data of women's hysterectomy experiences were collected via a written survey.

SETTING

Data were collected from women living in southeastern Wisconsin.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants were 102 women who had undergone hysterectomy within the previous 2 years. The mean age of the women was 43 and mean time since hysterectomy was 13 months. Eighty percent of the women had undergone both hysterectomy and oophorectomy, and 78% were taking hormone replacement therapy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

A questionnaire of women's hysterectomy needs and a demographic questionnaire were used to collect data via mail. The data from three open-ended questions were content analyzed.

RESULTS

Seven themes about women's experiences of hysterectomy were identified: (a) positive aspects, (b) hormone replacement therapy, (c) insufficient information, (d) changes in sexual feelings and functioning, (e) emotional support, (f) psychologic sequelae, and (g) feelings of loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Women wanted treatment choices, a part in decision-making, accurate and useful information at an appropriate time, provider support, and access to professional and lay support systems. The essentials for hysterectomy care are outlined and include the characteristics of care that women desire, the informational content that women want, health care systems that support patient satisfaction, and the outcomes women want.

Body image and sexuality in oophorectomized women

Five groups of women ages 35 to 55 years were studied, including a nonsurgical control group (CTL), a hysterectomy-only (HYS), and three oophorectomy groups: an untreated group (UNT), women on estrogen replacement therapy (EST), and women on androgen-estrogen replacement therapy (COM). The interview/questionnaire session assessed mood, body image, and sexual functioning. In a second session completed by 58 of 129 subjects (45%), a photoplethysmograph measured vaginal blood flow in response to an erotic stimulus while subjects concurrently monitored subjective arousal. Overall, the UNT and EST groups had significantly lower self-reported desire and arousal than the remaining three groups. Body image was significantly poorer in the UNT group. All surgical groups reported more sexual problems than the control group. Furthermore, about a third of the CTL group reported positive changes in body image and sexuality in the previous 5 years. This effect was attenuated in the HYS, COM, and EST groups and almost absent in the UNT group. No significant group differences were obtained, however, on mood or vaginal blood flow and subjective arousal to an erotic stimulus. The role of differential levels of testosterone on sexuality is discussed as well as its clinical implications.

Cultural factors and reaction to hysterectomy

The role of cultural background in the etiology of depressive symptoms associated with hysterectomy has been rarely explored. However, the increasing interest in the transcultural aspects of psychiatry in the last decade gives a particular relevance to this subject. In the current study, 152 women underwent hysterectomy in a downtown hospital of a large city. The population under study consisted of women of various ethnic backgrounds, French Canadian (35%), English Canadian (29%), European (22%) and other (14%). The women completed the Zung self-rating depression scale (SDS) before the operation and six times after during a one year period. They also answered two questionnaires, the first before the operation and the last one a year after. These questionnaires explored the presence of fears, misconceptions, the attitudes toward the operation, the satisfaction regarding medical care and the general pre- and post-operative adjustment. English Canadian women reported the lowest scores on the SDS; they had few misconceptions and fears. They had the best post-operative adjustment of the three groups. French Canadian women showed intermediate scores on the SDS and expressed more misconceptions and feelings of mutilations pre-operatively. Women of European origin showed the highest scores on the SDS at all observations, expressed more regrets about the operation and had a more difficult post-operative adjustment than the other two groups. This study suggests that cultural factors may contribute to the reaction to hysterectomy in women of different ethnic backgrounds. Education, the type of society: patriarchal versus matriarchal, the emphasis on the women's reproductive ability in a particular culture, are among other factors that seem to play an important role.

Anxiety, fears and depression related to hysterectomy

One-hundred and two women undergoing a hysterectomy for reasons other than cancer were interviewed pre-operatively. Fifty-three of them filled out the Spielberger State and Trait Anxiety Scale (STAI). Women who had high anxiety scores were more likely to be depressed, both before and after the operation. Depression occurred also more often in women who had emergency hysterectomies and in women who had expressed, pre-operatively, some fears of possible change in their sexual life after the operation.

Post-hysterectomy adaptation: a review and report of two follow-up studies

Hysterectomy, its indications and its consequences for later health, have been prominent topics in recent psychiatric, gynaecological and lay literature. This study describes the results of two recent surveys, one of 216 women less than 45 years old who had a hysterectomy for non-malignant conditions at a major Sydney hospital. These women were interviewed on the seventh to tenth postoperative day. One hundred and ninety-four were then followed up by questionnaire 13 months later. In a later study carried out at a hospital on the outskirts of Sydney, 100 out of 146 women responded to a follow-up questionnaire approximately one year after their operations. These studies and their relevance to recent similar studies are discussed in terms of post-hysterectomy adaptation and prognostic factors associated with poor psychiatric outcome.

The link between hysterectomy and depression

This paper reviews the current literature on the possible link between hysterectomy and depression. Psychological hypotheses for such a link are discussed. The literature is divided fairly evenly into those papers which support a definite association between hysterectomy and post-operative depression and those which refute any such link. A summary of these papers is given with a critical discussion of the various methodologies and operational definitions used.

No clear-cut association can be found on review of these studies, but in those papers which do suggest an association, the risk factors of a history of pre-operative depression, no organic uterine pathology and hysterectomy in young women of child bearing age are common to most. The point is made that depression occurring after hysterectomy is more likely to be associated with the social and psychological consequences of organ removal than with the operative procedure itself, and therefore, one may not expect the condition to become clinically obvious for anywhere from six months to two years post-operatively.

The authors conclude that care should be taken in performing hysterectomy where the indications are equivocal, especially if the above alleged risk factors are present. A plea is made for more research in this area to determine whether hysterectomy is a factor in the etiology of depression in some women, and if so, which women are at risk.